Abstract
In both vision and hearing, a masking or inhibiting stimulus increases the slope (exponent) of the power function that relates sensation to stimulus. The power transformation applies only to the inhibited part of the function where the signal is fainter than the masking noise. Where the signal equals the noise, the function shows a discontinuous knee. Experiments were undertaken to see whether the loudness of a tone of 1000 Hz in a white noise would follow a model based on a constant signal-to-noise ratio at two locations, at the effective threshold and at the knee where the inhibited function meets the uninhibited function. The data accord with the slopes (exponents) generated by the model. The same model gives a fairly good account of the recruitment functions for ears suffering from cochlear involvement (e.g., Méniere’s disease). Regardless of degree of hearing loss, loudness recruitment reaches normal when the tone (1000 Hz) is about 30 dB above the affected threshold.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hallpike, C. S., &Hood, J. D. Observations upon the neurological mechanism of the loudness recruitment phenomenon.Acta otolaryngol., 1959, 50, 472–486.
Hawkins, J. E., Jr., &Stevens, S. S. The masking of pure tones and of speech by white noise.J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 1950, 22, 6–13.
Horeman, H. W. Relation between brightness and luminance under induction.Vision Res., 1965, 5, 331–340.
Jerger, J. A., &Harford, E. R. Alternate and simultaneous binaural balancing of pure tones.J. speech hear. Res., 1960, 3, 15–30.
Miskolczy-Fodor, F. Relation between loudness and duration of tonal pulses. III. Response in cases of abnormal loudness function.J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 1960, 32, 486–492.
Stevens, J. C. Brightness inhibition re size of surround.Percept. & Psychophys., 1967, 2, 189–192.
Stevens, S. S. Earphone socket. U. S. Patent 2,408,490. October 1, 1946.
Stevens, S. S. The measurement of loudness.J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 1955, 27, 815–820.
Stevens, S. S. Measurement, psychophysics and utility. In C. W. Churchman and P. Ratoosh (Eds.),Measurement: Definitions and theories. New York: Wiley, 1959. Pp. 18–63.
Stevens, S. S. To honor Fechner and repeal his law.Science, 1961a, 133, 80–86.
Stevens, S. S. Procedure for calculating loudness; Mark VI.J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 1961b, 33, 1577–1585.
Stevens, S. S. Power-group transformations under glare, masking, and recruitment.J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 1966, 39, 725–735.
Stevens, S. S., &Greenbaum, Hilda B. Regression effect in psychophysical judgment.Percept. & Psychophys., 1966, 1, 439–446.
Zwicker, E. Über psychologische und methodische Grundlagen der Lauthett,Acustica 8,Akust. Beih., 1, 1958, 237–258.
Zwicker, E., Flottorp, G., &Stevens, S. S. Critical bandwidth in loudness summation.J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 1957, 29, 548–557.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Research supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant GB-3211 and in part by National Institutes of Health Grant NB-02974 (Laboratory of Psychophysics Report PPR-332-117).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stevens, S.S., Guirao, M. Loudness functions under inhibition. Perception & Psychophysics 2, 459–465 (1967). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208795
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208795