Abstract
Dynamic patterns of activity from multiple receptor systems, as well as efferent signals associated with voluntary movements, influence perceived body motion. The experiment to be described explored how these factors interrelate in influencing apparent body motion. It involved exposing stationary, reclining subjects to a patterned surface which rotated around a vertical or an off-vertical axis. We were able to create situations in which the combined patterns of visual, otolithic, somatosensory, and semicircular canal stimulation actually present were not consistent with body motion in a terrestrial environment. Nevertheless, all of our subjects experienced self-rotation and displacement around a vertical axis. A variety of changes in apparent body orientation, body configuration, and slant of the visual surface occurred concurrently with the elicitation of apparent body rotation. These perceptual remappings were such as to be consistent both with the rotary visual stimulation present and with the absence of changes in otolithic and somatosensory inputs. They were achieved through a reinterpretation of the static otolithic, somatosensory, and proprioceptive signals present. Our findings demonstrate that perceived body motion also depends on representations of what combinations of sensory input are possible in a terrestrial environment.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allum, J. H. J., Graf, W., Dichgans, J., &Schmidt, C. L. (1976). Visual-vestibular interactions in the vestibular nuclei of the goldfishExperimental Brain Research,26, 463–485.
Azzena, G. B., Azzena, M. T. &Marini, R. (1974) Optokinetic nystagmus and the vestibular nuclei.Experimental Neurology,42, 158–168
Bles, W. (1981) Circular vection arid Coriolis effects In J. Long & A Baddeley (Eds),Attention and performance IX (pp 47–61) Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum.
Bles, W., &Kapteyn, T. S. (1977) Circular vection and human posture. I. Does the proprioceptive system play a role?Agressologie,18, 325–328.
Brandt, Th., Buchele, W., &Arnold, F. (1977). Arthrokinetic nystagmus and egomotion sensation.Experimental Brain Research,21, 331–338
Daunton, N., &Thomsen, D. (1979) Visual modulation of otolithdependent units in cat vestibular nuclei.Experimental Brain Research,37, 173–176.
Dichgans, J., &Brandt, Th. (1972). Visual-vestibular interaction and motion perception. In J. Dichgans & E. Bizzi (Eds.),Cerebral control of eye movements and motion perception (pp. 327–338). Basel and New York: Karger.
Dichgans, J., &Brandt, Th. (1978). Visual-vestibular interaction: Effects on self-motion perception and postural control. In R. Held, H. Leibowitz, & H.-L. Teuber (Eds.),Handbook of sensory physiology: Vol. 8. Perception (pp. 755–803). Berlin and New York: Springer-Verlag.
Dodge, R. (1923). Thresholds of rotationJournal of Experimental Psychology,6, 107–137.
Duensing, F., &Schaefer, K.-P. (1958). Die Aktivitat einzelner Neurone im Bereich der Vestibulariskerne bei Horizontalbeschleunigung under besonderer Berucksichtigung des vestibularen Nystagmus.Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten,198, 225–252.
Graybiel, A., &Patterson, J. L. (1954).Thresholds of stimulation of the otolith organs as indicated by the oculogravic illusion (Research Report No. NM 001 059.01.38). Pensacola, FL: U.S. Naval School of Aviation Medicine.
Grusser, O.-J., &Grusser-Cornehls, V. (1973). Neuronal mechanisms of visual movement perception and some psychophysical and behavioral correlations. In R. Jung (Ed),Handbook of sensory physiology. Vol. 7, Part 3. Central processing of visual information (pp. 333–429). Berlin and New York: Springer-Verlag.
Held, R, Dichgans, J, &Bauer, J. (1975). Characteristics of moving visual scenes influencing spatial orientation.Vision Research,15, 357–365.
Henn, V., Cohen, B, &Young, L. (1980) Visual-vestibular interaction in motion perception and the generation of nystagmusNeurosciences Research Program Bulletin,18, 459–651.
Hill, V., Young, L. R., Finlpy, C. (1974) Vestibular nucleus units in alert monkeys are also influenced by, moving visual fieldBrain Research,71, 144–149
Huang, J K. &Young L R. (1981) Sensation of rotation about a vertical axis with a fixed visual field in different illuminations and in the darkExperimental Brain Research,41, 172–183
Lackner, J. R. (1977) Induction of nystagmus in stationary subjects with a rotating sound fieldAviation, Space & Environmental Medicine,48, 501–502.
Lackner, J. R., &Dizio, P. A. (1984). Some efferent and somatosensory influences on body orientation and oculomotor control. In R Wooten & L Spillmann (Eds.),Sensory experience, adaptation, and perception (pp 281–301) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Lackner, J. R., &Levine, M. L. (1979) Changes in apparent body orientation and sensory localization induced by vibration of postural muscles. Vibratory myesthetic illusionsAviation, Space & Environmental Medicine,50, 346–354
Lackner, J R, &Texiera, R. (1977) Visual-vestibular interaction: Vestibular stimulation suppresses the visual induction of illusory self-rotationAviation, Space & Environmental Medicine,48, 248–253
Mach, E. (1959)The analysis of sensations (S Waterlow, Trans). New York Dover. (5th German ed originally published 1906).
Mauritz, K.H., Dichgans, J., &Hufschmidt, A. (1977). The angle of visual roll motion determines displacement of subjective visual verticalPerception & Psychophysics,22, 557–562
Mergner, T., Nardi, G. L., Becker, W. &Deecke, L. (1983). The role of canal-neck interaction for the perception of horizontal trunk and head rotation.Experimental Brain Research,49, 198–208
Rubin, A. M., Liedgren, S. R., Miine, A. L., Young, J. A., &Fredrickson, J. M. (1977) Vestibular and somatosensory interaction on the cat vestibular nucleiPflugers Archiv,371, 155–160
Texiera, R. A Lackner, J. R. (1979) Optokinetic motion sickness Attenuation of visually induced apparent self-rotation& by passive head movementsAviation, Space & Environmental Medicine,50, 264–266.
Thoden V., Golsong, R., &Wirbitzky, J. (1975). Cervical influence on single units of vestibular and reticular nuclei in cats.Pflugers Archiv,355, R101.
Waespe W., &Henn, V. (1977) Neuronal activity in the vestibular nuclei of the alert monkey during vestibular and optokinetic stimulation.Experimental Brain Research,27, 523–538
Waespe W., Waespe, B. A Henn, V. (1980). Subjective velocity estimation during visual-vestibular conflictArchives of Psychiatry,228, 109–116.
Wilson, V. J., Kato, M, Thomas, R. C., &Peterson, B. W. (1966) Excitation of lateral vestibular neurons by peripheral afferent fibers.Journal of Neurophystology,29, 508–529.
Young L. R., Dichgans, J., Murphy, R., &Brandt, Th. (1973) Interaction of optokinetic and vestibular stimulum motor perceptionActa Oto-Laryngologica,76, 24–31.
Young L. R., Oman, C. M., &Dichgans, J. M. (1975). Influence of head orientation on visually induced pitch and roll sensation Aviation,Space & Environmental Medicine,45, 264–268
Zacharias, G. L., &Young, L. R. (1981) Influence of combined visual and vestibular cues on human perception and control of horizontal rotationExperimental Brain Research,41. 159–171
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Support was provided by National Aeronautics and Space Administration contract NAS 9-15147.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dizio, P.A., Lackner, J.R. Perceived orientation, motion, and configuration of the body during viewing of an off-vertical, rotating surface. Perception & Psychophysics 39, 39–46 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207582
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207582