Abstract
Thresholds for auditory motion detectability were measured in a darkened anechoic chamber while subjects were adapted to horizontally moving sound saurces of various-velocities. All stimuli were 500-Hz lowpass noises presented at a level of 55 dBA. The threshold measure employed was the minimum audible movement angle(MAMA)—that is, the minimum angle a horizontally moving sound must traverse to be just discriminable from a stationary sound. In an adaptive, two-interval forced-choice procedure, trials occurred every 2-5 sec (Experiment 1) or every 10–12 sec (Experiment 2). Intertrial time was “filled” with exposure to the adaptor—a stimulus that repeatedly traversed the subject’s front hemifield at ear level (distance: 1.7 m) at a constant velocity (−150°/secto + 150°/sec)during a run. Average MAMAs in the control condition, in which the adaptor was stationary (0°/sec), were 2.4° (Experiment 1) and 3.0° (Experiment 2). Three out of 4 subjects in each experiment showed significantly elevated MAMAs (by up to 60%), with some adaptors relative to the control condition. However, there were large intersubject differences in the shape of the MAMA versus adaptor velocity functions. This loss of sensitivity to motion that most subjects show after exposure to moving signals is probably one component underlying the auditory motion aftereffect (Grantham, 1989), in which judgmentsof the direction-afmoving sounds are biased in the direction opposite to that of a previously presented adaptor.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bauer, B. B. (1961). Phasor analysis of some stereophonic phenomena.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,33, 1536–1539.
Chandler, D. W., &Grantham, D. W. (1992). Minimum audible movement angle in the horizontal plane as a function of stimulus frequency and bandwidth, source azimuth, and velocity.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,91, 1624–1636.
Grantham, D. W. (1986). Detection and discrimination of simulated motion of auditory targets in the horizontal plane.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,79, 1939–1949.
Grantham, D. W. (1989). Motion aftereffects with horizontally moving sound sources in the free field.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 129–136.
Harris, J. D., &Sergeant, R. L. (1971). Monaural/binaural minimum audible angles for a moving sound source.Journal of Speech & Hearing Research,14, 618–629.
Johannson, G. (1956). The velocity of the motion after-effect.Acta Psychologica,12, 19–24.
Levitt, H. (1971). Transformed up-down methods inpsychoacoustics.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,49, 467–477.
McFadden, D., Jeffress, L. A., &Russell, W. E. (1973). Individual differences in sensitivity to interaural differences in time and level.Perceptual & Motor Skills,37, 755–761.
Perrott, D. R., &Marlborough, K. (1989). Minimum audible movement angle: Marking the end points of the path traveled by a moving sound source.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,85, 1773–1775.
Sekuler, R., &Pantle, A. (1967). A model for after-effects of seen movement.Vision Research,7, 427–439.
Winer, B. J. (1971).Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NIH Grant DCOO185.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grantham, D.W. Adaptation to auditory motion in the horizontal plane: Effect of prior exposure to motion on motion detectability. Perception & Psychophysics 52, 144–150 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206767
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206767