Abstract
The role of perceptual interference in letter identification was investigated in three experiments designed to test the feature-specific inhibition model proposed by Bjork and Murray (1977). According to their extension of Estes’ (1972, 1974) interactive channels model, input channels leading to the same feature detector inhibit one another more than do channels leading to different detectors. The model therefore predicts perceptual interference between two letters to be a function of the degree of their feature overlap. Experiment 1 confirmed the feature-specific inhibition model and Bjork and Murray’s finding that the accuracy of report is lower when a briefly presented target letter is flanked by an identical letter than when flanked by another target letter or by a nontarget letter. Results from Experiment 2 indicated that single-target performance is a function of the degree of feature similarity between the target letter and background characters in a stimulus display. Experiment 3 ruled out a spatial-uncertainty explanation of feature-specific inhibition in a new paradigm that does not require subjects to process a poststimulus cue. The results of these experiments are discussed in relation to recent studies exhibiting strong effects of noise letters at the response stage of processing. It is suggested that discrepancies between feature-specific interference and response-interference studies may be a function of the particular mode of stimulus presentation and of the dependent measures that are used.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bamber, D. Reaction times and error rates for “same”- “different” judgments of multidimensional stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics, 1969,6, 169–174.
Bertelson, P. Sequential redundancy and speed in a serial two-choice responding task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961,13, 90–102.
Bjork, E. L., &Murray, J. T. On the nature of input channels in visual processing.Psychological Review, 1977,84, 472–484.
Egeth, H. E., &Blecker, D. Differential effects of familiarity on judgments of sameness and difference.Perception & Psychophysics, 1971,9, 321–326.
Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,16, 143–149.
Eriksen, C. W. Independence of successive inputs and uncorrelated error in visual form perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966,72, 26–35.
Eriksen, C. W., &Eriksen, B. A. Target redundancy in visual search: Do repetitions of the target within the display impair processing?Perception & Psychophysics, 1979,26, 195–205.
Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,12, 201–204.
Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays.Perception& Psychophysics, 1973,14, 155–160.
Eriksen, C. W., &Lappin, J. S. Internal perceptual system noise and redundancy in simultaneous inputs in form identification.Psychonomic Science, 1965,2, 351–352.
Eriksen, C. W., &Schultz, D. W. Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results.Perception & Psychophysics, 1979,25, 249–263.
Estes, W. K. Interactions of signal and background variables in visual processing.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,12, 278–286.
Estes, W. K. Redundancy of noise elements and signals in visual detection of letter.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,16, 53–60.
Estes, W. K., Allmyer, D. H., &Reder, S. M. Serial position functions for letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,19, 1–15.
Felfoldy, G. L. Repetition effects in choice reaction time to multidimensional stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,15, 453–459.
Gardner, G. T. Evidence for independent parallel channels in tachistoscopic perception.Cognitive Psychology, 1973,4, 130–155.
Hubel, D. H., &Wiesel, T. N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex.Journal of Physiology, 1962,160, 106–154.
Hubel, D. H., &Wiesel, T. N. Receptive fields and functional architecture in two nonstriate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1965,28, 229–289.
Humphreys, L. G. Acquisition and extinction of verbal expectations in a situation analogous to conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1939,25, 294–301.
Kinchla, R. A. Detecting target elements in multielement arrays.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,15, 149–158.
Krueger, L. E. A theory of perceptual matching.Psychological Review, 1978,85, 278–304.
McIntyre, C., Fox, R., &Neale, J. Effects of noise similarity and redundancy on the information processed from brief visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics, 1970,7, 328–332.
Norman, D. A., &Borrow, D. G. On data-limited and resource-limited processes.Cognitive Psychology, 1975,7, 44–64.
Pomerantz, J. R., Sager, L. C., &Stoever, R. J. Perception of wholes and of their component parts: Some configural superiority effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977,3, 422–435.
Rumelhart, D. E. A multicomponent theory of the perception of briefly exposed visual displays.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1970,7, 191–218.
Schvaneveldt, R., &Meyer, D. E. Retrieval and comparison processes in semantic memory. In S. Kornblum (Ed.),Attention and performance IV. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Geisler, W. S. Visual recognition in a theory of information processing. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Contemporary issues in cognigive psychology: The Loyola Symposium. Washington, D.C: Winston, 1973.
Stanovich K. E. Studies of letter identification using qualitative error analysis: Effects of speed stress, tachistoscopic presentation, and word context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1979,5, 713–733.
Taylor, D. A. Time course of context effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1977,106, 404–426.
Townsend, J. T. Theoretical analysis of an alphabetic confusion matrix.Perception & Psychophysics, 1971,9, 40–50.
Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology, 1980,12, 97–136.
Woleord, G. Perturbation model for letter identification.Psychological Review, 1975,82, 184–199.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by a grant from the National Science Foundation (BNS-76-01227) to Howard Egeth and James Pomerantz.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Santee, J.L., Egeth, H.E. Interference in letter identification: A test of feature-specific inhibition. Perception & Psychophysics 27, 321–330 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206121
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206121