Abstract
Continuous changes in spatially separated figures can evoke perception of subjective contours and figures in physically homogeneous space between them. This occurs when all of the interruptions in the objectively present patterns (inducing elements) can be seen as caused by a unitary figure partly occluding them. Two experiments demonstrated and explored this phenomenon. In both, displays were presented to subjects under three conditions. In one condition, stationary inducing elements were shown as they would be interrupted by a figure rotating in front of them. In another condition, the background and inducing elements rotated, with interruptions occurring as if a stationary figure were in front. In a third condition, observers were shown 10 static views taken from the figure-rotation sequence for each display. Subjects consistently perceived unitary central figures with well-defined forms and clear edges from pattern changes given by figure movement and background movement. As with static subjective figures, kinetic subjective figures appear in front of, partly occluding, the inducing elements. These percepts form rapidly, and they depend upon temporal relations rather than upon information present in momentary views. Subjects occasionally reported subjective edges or a central figure in the stationary displays in Experiment 1, but not at all in Experiment 2, in which guessing tendencies were reduced by more specific instructions. The existence of kinetic subjective contours suggests that the visual system readily utilizes relationships among occlusion events separated in space and time. The minimum conditions for contour perception require neither information all along an edge nor simultaneous specification of the edge at two or more places.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brigner, W. L., &Gallagher, M. B. (1974). Subjective contour: Apparent depth or simultaneous brightness contrast?Perceptual& Motor Skills,38, 1047–1053.
Coren, S. (1972). Subjective contours and apparent depth.Psychological Review,79, 359–367.
Dumais, S. T., &Bradley, D. R. (1976). The effects of illumination level and retinal size on the apparent strength of subjective contours.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 339–345.
Frisby, J. P., &Clatworthy, J. L. (1975). Illusory contours: Curious cases of simultaneous brightness contrast?Perception,4, 349–357.
Gibson, J. J. (1979).The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gibson, J. J., Kaplan, G. A., Reynolds, H. N., &Wheeler, K. (1969). The change from visible to invisible: A study of optical transitions.Perception & Psychophysics,5, 113–116.
Hochberg, J. (1968). In the mind’s eye. In R. N. Haber (Ed.),Contemporary theory and research in visual perception. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Hochberg, J. (1982). How big is a stimulus? In J. Beck (Ed.),Organization and representation in perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Johansson, G. (1975). Visual motion perception.Scientific American,231(6), 76–88.
Johanssun, G., Von Hofsten, C., &Jansson, G. (1980). Event perception.Annual Review of Psychology,31, 27–63.
Kanizsa, G. (1955). Margini quasi-percettivi in campi con stimolazione omogenea.Rivista di Psicologia,49, 3–19.
Kanizsa, G. (1979).Organization in vision: Essays on Gestalt perception. New York: Praeger.
Kaplan, G. A. (1969). Kinetic disruption of optical texture: The perception of depth at an edge.Perception & Psychophysics,6, 193–198.
Kellman, P. J., & Cohen, M. H. (1983).Subjective contours in physically and perceptually homogeneous space. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Michotte, A., Thinés, G., &Crabbé, G. (1964).Les complements amodaux dex structures perceptives (Studia psychologica). Louvain: Publications Universitaires de Louvain.
Parks, T. (1965). Post-retinal visual storage.American Journal of Psychology,78,145–147.
Rock, I., &Anson, R. (1979). Illusory contours as the solution to a problem.Perception,8, 665–681.
Schumann, F. (1904). Beitrage zur Analyse der Gesichtswahrneh-mungen: 1. Einige Beobachtungen über die Zusammenfassung von Gesichtseindrucken zu Einheiten.Zeitschrift für Psychologie,13,1–32.
Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tynan, P., &Sekuler, R. (1975). Moving visual phantoms: A new contour completion effect.Science,188, 951–952.
Ullman, S. (1979).The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kellman, P.J., Cohen, M.H. Kinetic subjective contours. Perception & Psychophysics 35, 237–244 (1984). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205937
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205937