Abstract
The explanation of the tilt illusion that attributes the effect to lateral inhibitory interactions between cortical orientation-selective neurons suggests that illusion magnitude is dependent in part upon the lengths of the inducing (I) and test (T) arms of an angle. The model predicts (1) larger illusions for I length > T than for T > I; (2) that when I=T, peak illusion magnitude will occur for smaller angles between I and T when these lines are long than when they are short; and (3) that when I=T, smaller peak illusions for long lines than for short lines. Two experiments were conducted to test these predictions, and the results were consistent with all but the last of them. It is suggested that the aspect of the model that attributes perceived line orientation to the most active neurons stimulated by a line (the mode of the response function) requires reexamination.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carpenter, R. H. S., &Blakemore, C. (1973). Interactions between orientations in human vision.Experimental Brain Research,18, 287–303.
Henry, G. H., Bishop, P. O., &Dreher, B. (1974). Orientation, axis and direction as stimulus parameters for striate cells.Vision Research,14, 767–777.
Henry, G. H., Dreher, B., &Bishop, P. O. (1974). Orientation specificity of cells in cat striate cortex.Journal of Neurophysiology,37, 1394–1409.
O’Toole, B. I. (1979). The tilt illusion: Length and luminance changes of induction line and third (disinhibiting) line.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 487–496.
O’Toole, B. I., &Wenderoth, P. (1977). The tilt illusion: Repulsion and attraction effects in the oblique meridian.Vision Research,17, 367–374.
Parker, D. M. (1974). Evidence for the inhibition hypothesis in expanded angle illusion.Nature,250, 265–266.
Robinson, J. O. (1972).The psychology of visual illusion. London: Hutchinson.
Rose, D. (1977). Responses of single units in cat visual cortex to moving bars of light as a function of bar length.Journal of Physiology,271, 1–23.
Sclar, G., &Freeman, R. D. (1982). Orientation selectivity in the cat’s striate cortex is invariant with stimulus contrast.Experimental Brain Research,46, 457–461.
Virsu, V., &Taskinen, H. (1975). Central inhibitory interactions in human vision.Experimental Brain Research,23, 65–74.
Wallace, G. K. (1975). The effect of contrast on the Zöllner illusion.Vision Research,15, 963–966.
Wenderoth, P., &Johnson, M. (1984). The effects of angle-arm length on judgments of angle magnitude and orientation contrast.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 538–544.
Wenderoth, P., &Johnson, M. (1985). What is the appropriate control for the tilt illusion?Perception,14, 275–283.
Wenderoth, P., O’Toole, B., &Curthoys, I. (1975). The effect of inducing line length on the magnitude of the tilt illusion and aftereffect.Australian Journal of Psychology,26, 1–7.
Winer, B. J. (1962).Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by the Austrahan Research Grants Scheme, Grant A28515620 I to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wenderoth, P., O’Connor, T. & Johnson, M. The tilt illusion as a function of the relative and absolute lengths of test and inducing lines. Perception & Psychophysics 39, 339–345 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203001
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203001