Abstract
It has been claimed both that (1) imagery selectivelyinterferes with perception (because images can be confused with similar stimuli) and that (2) imagery selectivelyfacilitates perception (because images recruit attention for similar stimuli). However, the evidence for these claims can be accounted for without postulating either image-caused confusions or attentional set. Interference could be caused by general and modality-specific capacity demands of imaging, and facilitation, by image-caused eye fixations. The experiment reported here simultaneously tested these two apparently conflicting claims about the effect of imagery on perception in a way that rules out these alternative explanations. Subjects participated in a two-alternative forced-choice auditory signal detection task in which the target signal was either the same frequency as an auditory image or a different frequency. The possible effects of confusion and attention were separated by varying the temporal relationship between the image and the observation intervals, since an image can only be confused with a simultaneous signal. We found selective facilitation (lower thresholds) for signals of the same frequency as the image relative to signals of a different frequency, implying attention recruitment; we found no selective interference, implying the absence of confusion. These results also imply that frequency information is represented in images in a form that can interact with perceptual representations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Intons-Peterson, M. J. The role of loudness in auditory imagery.Memory & Cognition, 1980,8, 385–393.
Neisser, U.Cognition and reality. San Francisco: Freeman, 1976.
Peterson, M. J., &Graham, S. E. Visual detection and visual imagery.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,103, 509–514.
Reeves, A. Visual imagery lowers sensitivity to hue-varying, but not luminance-varying, visual stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics, 1981,29, 247–250.
Segal, S. J. Processing of the stimulus in imagery and perception. In S. J. Segal (Ed.),Imagery: Current cognitive approaches. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
Segal, S. J., &Fusella, V. Influence of imaged pictures and sounds on the detection of visual and auditory signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,83, 458–464.
Segal, S. J., &Gordon, P. The Perkey effect revisited: Paradoxical threshold or signal detection error.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1969,28, 791–797.
Shwartz, S. P. Capacity limitations in human information processing.Memory & Cognition, 1976,4, 763–768.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by NSF Grant BNS 79-12418 awarded to Stephen M. Kosslyn.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Farah, M.J., Smith, A.F. Perceptual interference and facilitation with auditory imagery. Perception & Psychophysics 33, 475–478 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202899
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202899