Abstract
Five studies employed a Stroop paradigm to examine the activation of instruments in sentence comprehension. Two types of instruments were studied, tools (e.g., spoon, hammer) and body parts (e.g., hand, wing). For example, is the concept “broom” activated by the sentence “The man swept the floor,” or is the concept “wing” activated by the sentence “The duck flew over the pond”? Earlier studies have suggested that implicit instruments are not encoded in the underlying representation of a sentence during comprehension. The first four studies in the present paper reveal no evidence that abstract knowledge of the instruments is even activated. In the fifth study, the Stroop task reveals an effect if subjects are instructed to generate implicit instruments, although a facilitatory (rather than an inhibitory) effect is obtained.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference Note
Corbett, A. T., & Dosher, B. A.Instument completion norms of 67 sentences. Manuscript available from A. T. Corbett, Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, and B. A. Dosher, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027.
References
Anderson, R. C., &Prchert, J. W. Recall of previously unrecall-able information following a shift in perspective.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1978,17, 1–12.
Bartlett, F. C.Remembering: A study in experimental and social Psychology. New York: Macmillan, 1932.
Bobrow, D. G., &Norman, D. A. Some principles of memory schemata. In D. G. Bobrow & A. M. Collins (Eds.),Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., &Turner, T. J. Scripts in memory for text.Cognitive Psychology, 1979,11, 177–220.
Bransford, J. D., &McCarrell, N. A. A sketch of a cognitive approach to comprehension. In W. Weimer & D. Palermo (Eds.),Cognition and the symbolic processes. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1974.
Collins, A. M., &Loftus, E. F. A spreading activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review, 1975,82, 407–428.
Conrad, C. Context effects in sentence comprehension: A study of the subjective lexicon.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 130–138.
Corbett, A. T., &Dosher, B. A. Instrument inferences in sentence encoding.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1978,17, 479–491.
Dyer, F. N. The duration of word meaning responses: Stroop interference for different preexposures of the word.Psychonomic Science, 1971,25, 229–231.
Fischler, I. Associative facilitation without expectancy in a lexical decision task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977,3, 18–26. (a)
Fischler, I. Semantic facilitation without association in a lexical decision task.Memory & Cognition, 1977,5, 335–339. (b)
Graesser, A. C., Gordon, S. E., &Sawyer, J. D. Recognition memory for typical and atypical actions in scripted activities: Tests of a script pointer plus tag hypothesis.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1979,18, 319–332.
Hasher, L., &Griffin, M. Reconstructive and reproductive processes in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1978,4, 318–330.
Hintzman, D. L., Carre, F. A., Eskridge, V. L., Owens, A. M., Sparks, M. E., &Shaff, S. S. Stroop effect: Input or output phenomenon?Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,95, 458–459.
Johnson, M. K., Bransford, J. D., &Solomon, S. K. Memory for tacit implications of sentences.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,98, 203–205.
Keele, S. W. Attention demands of memory retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,93, 245–248.
Klein, G. S. Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color naming.American Journal of Psychology, 1964,72, 576–588.
Loftus, E. F. Activation of semantic memory.American Journal of Psychology, 1973,86, 331–337.
McKoon, G., &Ratcliff, R. Priming in episodic and semantic memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1979,18, 463–480.
McKoon, G., &Ratcliff, R. The comprehension processes and memory structures involved in anaphoric reference.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1980,19, 668–682. (a)
McKoon, G., &Ratcliff, R. Priming in item recognition: The organization of propositions in memory for text.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1980,19, 369–386. (b)
McKoon, G., &Ratcliff, R. The comprehension processes and memory structures involved in instrumental reference.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1981,20, 671–682.
Meyer, D. E., &Schvanefeldt, R. W. Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,90, 227–243.
Neely, J. H. Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1977,106, 226–254.
Neill, W. T. Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1977,3, 444–450.
Neill, W. T. Decision processes in selective attention: Response priming in the Stroop color-word task.Perception & Psychophysics, 1978,23, 80–84.
Norman, D. A., &Bobrow, D. G. Descriptions: An immediate stage in memory retrieval.Cognitive Psychology, 1979,11, 107–123.
Paris, S. C., &Lindauer, B. K. The role of inference in children’s comprehension and memory for sentences.Cognitive Psychology, 1976,8, 217–227.
Ratcliff, R., &McKoon, G. Priming in item recognition: Evidence for the propositional structure of sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1978,17, 403–417.
Ratcliff, R., &McKoon, G. Automatic and strategic priming in recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1981,20, 204–215.
Reder, L. M., &Anderson, J. R. A partial resolution of the paradox of interference: The role of integrating knowledge.Cognitive Psychology, 1980,12, 447–472.
Rumelhart, D. E. Notes on a schema for stories. In D. G. Bobrow & A. M. Collins (Eds.),Representation and understanding. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
Schank, R. C. The structure of episodes in memory. In D. G. Bobrow & A. M. Collins (Eds.),Representation and understanding. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
Schank, R. C., &Abelson, R. P.Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.
Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Meyer, D. E. Retrieval and comparison processes in semantic memory. In S. Kornblum (Ed.),Attention and performance IV. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Singer, M. Context inferences in the comprehension of sentences.Canadian Journal of Psychology/Review of Canadian Psychology, 1976,30, 39–46.
Singer, M. Processes of inference during sentence encoding.Memory & Cognition, 1979,7, 192–200.
Singer, M. The role of case-filling inferences in the coherence of brief passages.Discourse Processes, 1980,3, 185–201.
Smith, E. E., Adams, N., &Schorr, D. Fact retrieval and the paradox of interference.Cognitive Psychology, 1978,10, 438–464.
Stroop, J. R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1935,18, 643–662.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Flanigan, H. P., &Seidenberg, M. S. Orthographic and phonological activation in auditory and visual word recognition.Memory & Cognition, 1980,8, 513–520.
Warren, R. E. Stimulus encoding and memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,94, 90–100.
Winer, B. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Education (NIE-G-77-0008 NIE-G-80-0175), the Spencer Foundation, and the Columbia University Council for the Social Sciences.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dosher, B.A., Corbett, A.T. Instrument inferences and verb schemata. Mem Cogn 10, 531–539 (1982). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202435
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202435