Abstract
Observers with good stereoacuity judged which eye received sine-wave grating patterns in a two-category forced-choice procedure. Large individual differences were found, but for most observers reliable discrimination was achieved at low spatial frequencies. No observer could perform the task above chance levels at high spatial frequencies. Discrimination was unaffected by retinal location, grating orientation, grating contrast, stimulus duration, or practice with feedback. Among observers who could perform the task, the following results were obtained: (1) Introduction of high spatial frequency components did not interfere with performance so long as a low spatial frequency component was present. (2) When gratings of low equal spatial frequency were presented to both eyes simultaneously at different contrast levels, observers could identify which eye received the higher contrast. (3) At low spatial frequencies, observers could distinguish monocular from binocular presentation. (4) Temporal frequency variations (counterphase flicker) influenced performance for some observers. Binocular summation and interocular transfer were unaffected by the spatial frequency variations which modulate utrocular discrimination. A new procedure for measuring stereopsis was developed which made possible comparison of utrocular discrimination with stereopsis at specific spatial frequencies. Stereopsis appeared mildly affected by spatial frequency.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barlow, H. B., Blakemore, C, &Pettigrew, J. D. The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination.Journal of Physiology, 1967,193, 327–342.
Barrett, G. V., &Williamson, T. R. Judging with which eye one is viewing a three dimensional scene.Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1965,21, 455–458.
Berkley, M. A., Kitterle, F., &Watkins, D. W. Grating visibility as a function of orientation and retinal eccentricity.Vision Research, 1975,15, 239–244.
Biake, R., &Cormack, R. Psychophysical evidence for a monocular visual cortex in stereoblind humans.Science, 1979,203, 274–275.
Blake, R., &Fox, R. The psychophysical inquiry into binocular summation.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,14, 161–185.
Blake, R., &Hirsch, H. V. B. Binocular depth discrimination in normal and specially-reared cats.Science, 1975,190, 1114–1116.
Blake, R., &Levinson, E. Spatial properties of binocular neurones in the human visual system.Experimental Brain Research, 1977,27, 221–232.
Blakemore, C. A new kind of stereoscopic vision.Vision Research, 1970,10, 1181–1199.
Brindley, G. S.Physiology of the retina and visual pathway (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1970.
Campbell, F. W., &Green, D. G. Monocular versus binocular visual acuity.Nature, 1965,208, 191–192.
Campbell, F. W., Howell, E. R. &Robson, J. G. The appearance of gratings with and without the fundamental Fourier component.Journal of Physiology (London), 1971,217, 17–18P.
Enoch, J., Goldmann, H., &Sunga, R. The ability to distinguish which eye was stimulated by light.Investigative Ophthalmology, 1969,8, 317–331.
Fiorentini, A., &Maffei, L. Binocular depth perception with-out geometrical cues.Vision Research, 1971,11, 1299–1305.
GREGORY, R. L.Eye and brain, the psychology of seeing (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
Harmon, L. D., &Julesz, B. Masking in visual recognition: Effects of two-dimensional filtered noise.Science, 1973,180, 1194–1197.
Hess, R. Interocular transfer in individuals with strabismic amblyopia; a cautionary note.Perception, 1978,7, 201–205.
Ikeda, H., &Wright, M. J. Processing of spatial and temporal information in the visual system. In F. O. Schmitt & F. G. Worden (Eds.),The neurosciences, third study program. Cambridge, Mass; MIT Press, 1974.
Kelly, D. H. Effects of sharp edges on the visibility of sinusoidal gratings.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1970,60, 98–103.
Kulikowski, J. J., &Tolhurst, D. J. Psychophysical evidence for sustained and transient detectors in human vision.Journal of Physiology, 1973,232, 149–162.
Legge, G. E. Sustained and transient mechanisms in human vision: Temporal and spatial properties.Vision Research, 1978,18, 69–81.
Lema, S. A., &Blake, R. Binocular summation in normal and stereoblind humans.Vision Research, 1977,17, 691–695.
Mitchell, D. E., &Ware, C. Interocular transfer of a visual aftereffect in normal and stereoblind humans.Journal of Physiology, 1974,236, 707–721.
Movshon, J. A., Chambers, B. E. I., &Blakemore, C. Interocular transfer in normal humans and those who lack stereopsis.Perception, 1972,1, 483–490.
Nikara, T., Bishop, P. O., &Pettigrew, J. D. Analysis of retinal units in cat striate cortex.Experimental Brain Research, 1968,6, 353–372.
Ogle, K. N.Researches in binocular vision. New York: Hafner, 1950.
Packwood, J., &Gordon, B. Stereopsis in normal domestic cat, Siamese cat, and cat raised with alternate monocular occlusion.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1975,38, 1485–1499.
Pickersgill, M. J. On knowing with which eye one is seeing.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961,13, 168–172.
Rose, D. Monocular versus binocular contrast thresholds for movement and pattern.Perception, 1978,7, 195–200.
Schade, O. H. Optical and photoelectric analog of the eye.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1956,46, 721–739.
Sherman, S. M., Hoffman, K. P., &Stone, J. Loss of a specific cell type from dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in visually deprived cats.Journal of Physiology, 1972,35, 532–541.
Smith, S. Utrocular or ‘which eye’ discrimination.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1945,35, 1–14.
Stromeyer, C. F., &Julesz, B. Spatial-frequency masking in vision: Critical bands and spread of masking.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1972,62, 1221 -1232.
Templeton, W. B., &Green, F. A. Chance results in utrocular discrimination.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968,20, 200–203.
Thelin, E., &Altman, E. R. Identification of monocular functions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1929,1, 79–87.
Wade, N. J. On interocular transfer of the movement after-effect in individuals with and without normal binocular vision.Perception, 1976,4, 85–95.
Ware, C. &Mitchell, D. E. On interocular transfer of various visual aftereffects in normal and stereoblind observers.Vision Research, 1974,14, 731–734.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by grants from NSF (BNS 75-17073) and NIH (EY01596).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blake, R., Cormack, R.H. On utrocular discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics 26, 53–68 (1979). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199861
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199861