Abstract
The present research examined the role of phonological and orthographic properties of cues in mediating the retrieval of words from the mental lexicon. The task required subjects to resolve fragmented words when provided with semantically related cues (e.g., spiteful:—DIC—). Phonological properties of the letter cues were manipulated such that the letters either corresponded to the syllables (e.g., DIC invindictive) or nonsyllables (NDI) in the word Orthographic properties of the letter cues were manipulated by selecting letter groups that either co-occurred frequently in the language or did not. In two experiments, results revealed little or no effect of the phonological variable (syllables) but a reliable effect of the orthographic variable (letter-cue frequency). Letter cues with a low frequency of co-occurrence in the language led to better completion of the fragmented words. We interpret these findings as support for models of lexical representation that are based on orthographic properties (e.g., Seidenberg & McClelland, 1989) rather than those based on phonological constraints.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, M. (1981). What good is orthographic redundancy? in H. Singer & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.),Perception of prim (pp. 197–221), Hiltsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Balota, D. A. A., Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production frequency?Journal of Memory & Language,24, 89–106.
Dolinsky, R. (1973). Word fragments as recall cues: Role of syllables.Journal of Experimental Psychology,97, 272–274.
Forster, K. I., &Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12,627–635.
Frederiksen, J. R., &Kroll, J. F. (1976). Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 361–379.
Goudblum, N., &Frost, R. (1988). The crossword puzzle paradigm: The effectiveness of different word fragments as cues for the retrieval of words.Memory & Cognition,16, 158–166.
Graf, P., &Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 553–568.
Graf, P., &Schacter, D. L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 501–518.
Hansen, D., &Rodgers, T. S. (1968). An exploration of psycholinguistic units in initial reading. In K. S. Goodman (Ed.),The psycholinguistic nature of the reading process (pp. 59–102). Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Henderson, L. (1985). Issues in the modelling of pronunciation assembly in normal reading. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.),Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 459–508). London: Erlbaum.
Hoard, J. (1971). Aspiration, tenseness and syllabification in English.Language,47, 133–140.
Horowitz, L. M., Chilian, P. C, &Dunnigan, K. P. (1969). Word fragments and their redintegrative powers.Journal of Experimental Psychology,80, 392–394.
Horowitz, L. M., White, M. A., &Atwood, D. W. (1968). Word fragments as an aid to recall: The organization of a word.Journal of Experimental Psychology,76, 219–226.
Hunt, R. R., &Toth, J. P. (1990). Perceptual identification, fragment completion, and free recall: Concepts and data.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 282–290.
Kahn, D. (1976).Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Klapp, S. T. (1971). Implicit speech inferred from response latencies in same-different decisions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,91, 262–267.
Klapp, S. T., Anderson, W. G., &Herman, R. W. (1973). Implicit speech in reading reconsidered.Journal of Experimental Psychology,100, 368–374.
Kučra, H., A Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Lima, S. D., &Pollatsek, A. (1983). The Basic Orthographic Syllable Structure (BOSS) reconsidered: Lexical access via an orthographic code? Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 310–332.
Mewhort, D. J. K., &Beal, A. L. (1977). Mechanisms of word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 629–640.
Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Neely, I. H., Crawley, E.J., & Vellutino, F. R. (1990, November).Do words that are first syllables of other words access their semantic codes? Paper presented at the 31st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
Nelson, D. L., Canas, J. J., Bajo, M. T., &Keelan, P. D. (1987). Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.Joumal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 542–552.
Oxford American Dictionary (1980). New York: Oxford University Press. Pratt, F. (1939). Secret and urgent. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Prinzmetal, W., &Milus-Wright, M. (1984). Cognitive and linguistic factors affect visual feature integration.Cognitive Psychology,16, 305–340.
Prinzmetal, W., Treiman, R., &.Rho, S. H. (1986). How to see a reading unit.Journal of Memory & Language,25, 461–475.
Richardson, J. T. E. (1976). The effects of stimulus attributes upon latency of word recognition.British Journal of Psychology,67, 315–325.
Roediger, H. L. (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering.American Psychologist,45, 1043–1056.
Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 501–518.
Seidenberg, M. S. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention ami performance: Vol. 12. Reading (pp. 245–263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Seidenberg, M. S. (1989). Reading complex words. In G. N. Carlson & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.),Linguistic structure in language processing (pp. 53–107). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Seidenberg, M. S., &McClelland, J. L (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review,96, 523–568.
Shulman, H. G., Hornak, R., &Sanders, E. (1978). The effects of graphemic, phonetic, and semantic relationships on access to lexical structures.Memory & Cognition,6, 115–123.
Spoehr, K., &Smith, E. (1973). The role of syllables in perceptual processing.Cognitive Psychology,5, 71–89.
Spoehr, K., &Smith, E. (1975). The role of orthographic and phonotactic rules in perceiving letter patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,1, 21–34.
Taylor, G. A., Miller, T. J., &Juola, J. F. (1977). Isolating visual units in the perception of words and nonwords.Perception & Psychophysics,21, 377–386.
Treisman, A., &Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects.Cognitive Psychology,14, 107–141.
Underwood, B. J., &Schulz, R. W. (1960).Meaningfidness and verbal learning. Chicago: Lippincott.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Srinivas, K., Roedtger, H.L. & Rajaram, S. The role of syllabic and orthographic properties of letter cues in solving word fragments. Memory & Cognition 20, 219–230 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199659
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199659