Abstract
Using a light or backshock as the reinforced CS (A) and a tone or backshock as the conditioned inhibitor (X), rabbits experienced conditioned inhibition training in an A+/AX− paradigm. Following training, the amplitude of the unconditioned nictitating membrane response elicited by a mild (.5-mA) paraorbital shock was measured in the presence of X and AX and expressed as a percentage of the amplitude of the UR to the shock presented alone. In Experiment 1, the effect of X and AX on UR amplitude for conditioned inhibition animals was compared with that of control animals treated to a variety of pretest procedures. In general, UR amplitude in the presence of X exceeded that observed to the US presented alone. There was no consistent difference between the experimental and control groups. In Experiments 2–5, A test trials were added as an alternative reference point. Again, UR amplitude increased rather than decreased UR amplitude. In addition, X as a conditioned inhibitor enhanced the facilitating effect of A on UR amplitude in four out of five experiments. These findings have implications for theories of the “locus of action” of conditioned inhibitors.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference Note
Moore, J. W. Contextual constraints on Pavlovian inhibitory control. InConditioning context and stimulus control. Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, September 1974.
References
Gormezano, I., &Moore, J. W. Classical conditioning. In M. H. Marx (Ed.),Learning: Processes. Toronto: Collier-Macmillan, 1969.
Ison, J. R., &Leonard, D. W. Effect of auditory stimuli on the amplitude of the nictitating membrane reflex of the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus).Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1971,75, 157–164.
Konorski, J. Conditioned reflexes and neuron organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1948.
Marchant, H. G., III,Mis, F. W., &Moore, J. W. Conditioned inhibition of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,95, 408–411.
Marchant, H. G., III, &Moore, J. W. Below-zero conditioned inhibition of the rabbit’s nictating membrane response.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,102, 350–352.
Reiss, S., &Wagner, A. R. CS habituation produces a “latent inhibition effect” but no active “conditioned inhibition.”Learning and Motivation, 1972,3, 237–245.
Rescorla, R. A. A model of Pavlovian conditioning. In V. S. Rusinov (Ed.),Mechanisms of formation and inhibition of conditional reflex. Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R., 1974.
Rescorla, R. A. Conditioned inhibition and extinction. In A. Dickinson & R. A. Boakes (Eds.),Mechanisms of learning and memory: A memorial volume to Jerzy Konorski. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.
Rescorla, R. A., &Holland, P. C. Associations in Pavlovian conditioned inhibition.Learning and Motivation, 1977,8, 429–447.
Thomas, E., &Basbaum, C. Excitatory and inhibitory processes in hypothalamic conditioning in cats: Role of the history of the negative stimulus.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1972,79, 419–424.
Wagner, A. R., &Rescorla, R. A. Inhibition in Pavlovian conditioning: Application of a theory. In R. A. Boakes & M. S. Halliday (Eds.),Inhibition and learning. London: Academic Press, 1972.
Wagner, A. R., Thomas, E., &Norton, T. Conditioning with electrical stimulation of the motor cortex: Evidence of a possible source of motivation.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1967,64, 191–199.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NSF Grant BNS 77-14871 to the third author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Desmond, J.E., Romano, A.G. & Moore, J.W. Amplitude of the rabbit’s unconditioned nictitating membrane response in the presence of a conditioned inhibitor. Animal Learning & Behavior 8, 225–230 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199599
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199599