Abstract
We hypothesize that typical example problems used in quantitative domains such as algebra and probability can be represented in terms of subgoals and methods that these problems teach learners. The “quality” of these subgoals and methods can vary, depending on the features of the examples. In addition, the likelihood of these subgoals’ being recognized in novel problems and the likelihood of learners’ being able to modify an old method for a new problem may be functions of the training examples learners study. In Experiment 1, subjects who studied examples predicted to teach certain subgoals were often able to recognize those subgoals in nonisomorphic transfer problems. Subjects who studied examples demonstrating two methods rather than one exhibited no advantages in transfer. Experiment 2 demonstrated that if the conditions for applying a method are highlighted in examples, learners are more likely to appropriately adapt that method in a novel problem, perhaps because they recognize that the conditions do not fully match those required for any of the old methods. Overall, the results indicate that the subgoal/method representational scheme may be useful in predicting transfer performance.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R. (1983).The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anderson, J. R., Farrell, R., &Savers, R. (1984). Learning to program in LISP.Cognitive Science,8, 87–129.
Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., &Holland, P. W. (1975).Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bovair, S., Kieras, D. E., &Polson, P. (1990). The acquisition and performance of text editing skills: A production system analysis.Human-Computer Interaction,5, 1–48.
Brown, A. L., Kane, M. J., &Echols, C. H. (1986). Young children’s mental models determine analogical transfer across problems with a common goal structure.Cognitive Development,1, 103–121.
Catrambone, R. (1990). Specific versus general procedures in instructions.Human-Computer Interaction,5, 49–93.
Catrambone, R., &Holyoak, K. J. (1987). Transfer in problem solving as a function of the procedural variety of training problems. InProceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 36–49). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, R., Reimann, P., &Glaser, R. (1989). Self explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems.Cognitive Science,13, 145–182.
Foltz, P. W., Davies, S. E., Polson, P. G., &Kieras, D. E. (1988). Transfer between menu systems. InProceedings CHI ’88 Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 107–122). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Gick, M. L., &Holyoak, K. J. (1980).Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology,12, 306–355.
Gick, M. L., &Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer.Cognitive Psychology,15, 1–38.
Glee, M. L., &Holyoak, K. J. (1987). The cognitive basis of knowledge transfer. In S. M. Cormier & J. D. Hagman (Eds.),Transfer of learning: Contemporary research and applications (pp. 9–46). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Greeno, J. G., Riley, M. S., &Gelman, R. (1984). Conceptual competence and children’s counting.Cognitive Psychology,16, 94–143.
Hayes, J. R., Waterman, D. A., &Robinson, C. S. (1977). Identifying the relevant aspects of a problem text.Cognitive Science,1, 297–313.
Kieras, D. E., &Bovair, S. (1984). The role of a mental model in learning to operate a device.Cognitive Science,8, 255–273.
Lancaster, I. S., &Kolodner, J. L. (1988).Problem solving and learning in a natural task domain (Tech. Rep. No. GIT-ICS-89/02). Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.
Larkin, J. (1983). The role of problem representation in physics. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.),Mental models (pp. 75–98). Hilisdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lefevre, J., &Dixon, P. (1986). Do written instructions need examples?Cognition & Instruction,3, 1–30.
Lewis, M. W., &Anderson, J. R. (1985). Discrimination of operator schemata in problem solving: Learning from examples.Cognitive Psychology,17, 26–65.
Mayer, R. E., &Greeno, J. G. (1972). Structural differences between learning outcomes produced by different instructional methods.Journal of Educational Psychology,63, 165–173.
Mckendree, J. (1986).Impact of feedback content during complex skill acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh.
Morsis, N. M., &Rouse, W. B. (1985). The effects of type of knowledge upon human problem solving in a process control task.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, & Cybernetics,15, 689–707.
Pirolli, P. L., &Anderson, J. R. (1985). The role of learning from examples in the acquisition of recursive programming skill.Canadian Journal of Psychology,39, 240–272.
Reder, L. M., Charney, D. H., &Morgan, K. I. (1986). The role of elaborations in learning a skill from an instructional text.Memory & Cognition,14, 64–78.
Reed, S. K., & Actor, C. (1989).The use of examples and procedures in problem solving. Unpublished manuscript.
Reed, S. K., Dempster, A., &Ettinger, M. (1985). Usefulness of analogous solutions for solving algebra word problems.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 106–125.
Ross, B. (1984). Remindings and their effects in learning a cognitive skill.Cognitive Psychology,16, 371–416.
Ross, B. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 629–639.
Ross, B. (l989a). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 456.468.
Ross, B. (1989b). Remindings in learning and instruction. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.),Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 438–469). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1979). Explicit heuristic training as a variable in problem-solving performance.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,10, 173–187.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985).Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H., &Herrmann, D. J. (1982). Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 484–494.
Singley, M. K., &Anderson, J. R. (1988). A keystroke analysis of learning and transfer in text editing.Human-Computer Interaction,3, 223–274.
Singley, M. K., &Anderson, J. R. (1989).The transfer of cognitive skill. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Spencer, R. M., &Weisberg, R. W. (1986). Context-dependent effects on analogical transfer.Memory & Cognition,14, 442–449.
Stein, B. S., Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., Owings, R. A., Vye, N. J., &McGraw, W. (1982). Differences in the precision of self-generated elaborations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,111, 399–405.
Sweller, J., Mawer, R. F., &Ward, M. R. (1983). Development of expertise in mathematical problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 639–661.
VanLehn, K. (1982). Bugs are not enough: Empirical studies of bugs, impasses and repairs in procedural skills.Journal of Mathematical Behavior,3, 3–71.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NSF Grant BNS 86-153 16. Experiment I was reported at the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Seattle, July 1987.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Catrambone, R., Holyoak, K.J. Learning subgoals and methods for solving probability problems. Memory & Cognition 18, 593–603 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197102
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197102