Abstract
Three experiments were carried out to investigate peoples memory for British coins. Two principal issues were studied. First, it has previously been shown that memory for U.S. pennies and other coins is surprisingly imperfect. How do other countries compare? It turned out that recall of the design of British pennies was, if anything, worse even than that of U.S. pennies. The situation was no better for a larger coin with an unusual shape. It is suggested that individual features are poorly remembered if they have low levels of meaningfulness, redundancy, identifiability, and discriminativeness. Second, in addition to this generally weak level of remembering, an instance of systematic misremembering was consistently observed. The Queens portrait always faces to the right on British coins. Yet in all three experiments, the proportion of participants who recalled that the portrait faces to the right was so low (overall, 19%) that it was significantly less than even the 50% baseline to be expected from people in a state of complete ignorance. It follows that the participants were not in a state of complete ignorance. Rather, they relied-upon extraneous knowledge of either a general or a specific nature (bias and schemahypotheses, respectively), whose importation into this domain was in fact invalid. The resulting belief that coin portraits face left was not right.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1978). The trouble with levels: A reexamination of Craik and Lockharts framework for memory research.Psychological Review,85, 139–152.
Baddeley, A. D. (1982).Your memory:A user’s guide. London: Sidgwick & Jackson.
Bourne, L. E., Dominowski, R. L., Lofrus, E. F., &Healy, A. F. (1986),Cognitive processes (2nd ed). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Cohen, G. (1989).Memory in the real world. London: Erlbaum.
Coon, D. (1986).Introduction to psychology: Exploration and application. St. Paul, MN: West.
Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 671–684.
Dworetzky, J. P. (1988).Psychology (3rd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West.
Gordon, I. E. (1974). Left and right in Goya’s portraits.Nature,249, 197–198.
Grunebero, M. M., Morlus, P. E., & Sykes, R. N. (Eds.). (1978).Practical aspects of memory. London: Academic Press.
Gruneberg, M. M., Morris, P. E., & Sykes, R. N. (Eds.). (1988).Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vols. 1 & 2). New York: Wiley.
Humphrey, N. K., &McManus, I. C. (1973). Status and the left cheek,New Scientist,59, 437–439.
Jones, G. V. (1978). Recognition failure and dual mechanisms in recall.Psychological Review,85, 464–469.
Jones, G. V. (1979). Analyzing memory by cuing: Intrinsic and extrinsic knowledge. In N. S. Sutherland (Ed.),Tutorial essays in psychology: Aguide to recent advances (Vol. 2, pp. 119–147). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jones, G. V. (1983a). Identifying basiccategories.Psychological Bulletin,94, 423–428.
Jones, G. V. (1983b). Structure of the recall process.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society,302B, 373–385. Reprinted in D. E. Broadbent (Ed.),Functional aspects of human memory (pp. 135–147). London: Royal Society.
Jones, G. V. (1984). Fragment and schema models for recall.Memory & Cognition,12, 250–263.
Jones, G. V. (1985). Deep dyslexia, imageability, and ease of predication.Brain & Language,24, 1–19.
Jones, G. V. (1988). Images, predicates, and retrieval cues. In M. Denis, J. Engelkamp, & J. T. E. Richardson (Eds.),Cognitive and neuropsychological approaches to mental imagery (pp. 89–98). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
McManus, I. C., &Humphrey, N. K. (1973). Turning the left cheek.Nature,243, 271–272.
Morris, P. E. (1988). Expertise and everyday memory. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1, pp. 459–465). New York: Wiley.
Neisser, U. (1982).Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Nickerson, R. S., &Adams, M. J. (1979). Long-term memory for a common object.Cognitive Psychology,11, 287–307.
Norman, D. A. (1988).The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
Reed, S. K. (1988).Cognition: Theory and applications (2nd ed). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., &Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories.Cognitive Psychology,8, 382–439.
Rubin, D. C., &Kontis, T. C. (1983). A schema for common cents.Memory & Cognition,11, 335–341.
Smyth, M. M., Morris, P. E., Levy, P., &Ellis, A. W. (1987).Cognition in action. London: Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, G.V. Misremembering a common object: When left is not right. Memory & Cognition 18, 174–182 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197093
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197093