Abstract
Explanations of context effects in the Reicher-Wheeler task and the letter-identification task appeal to word-based processing, yet these tasks provide no explicit measure of word processing. An experiment is reported which was designed to investigate the use of transfer in the word-identification task as a measure of word-based processing in letter-identification tasks. It was found that encoding manipulations that determined whether a word-superiority effect was or was not found in a letter-identification task (e.g., Thompson & Massaro, 1973) also determined whether transfer was or was not found in a subsequent word-identification task. The results of the experiment are discussed in terms of the utility of using transfer experiments as converging evidence about the presence and/or absence of processes that cannot be directly measured in other experimental paradigms.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, M. J. (1979). Models of word recognition.Cognitive Psychology,11, 133–176.
Carr,T. H., Davidson, B. J., &Hawkins, H. L. (1978). Perceptual flexibility III word recognition: Strategies affect orthographic computation but not lexical access.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,4, 674–690.
Dobbs, A. R., Friedman, A., &Lloyd, J. (1985). Frequency effects in lexical decisions: A test of the venfication model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 81–92.
Estes, W. K. (1975). The locus of inferential and perceptual processes in letter identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,104, 122–145.
Jacoby, L. L. (1983a). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 21–38.
Jacoby, L. L. (1983b). Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 485–508.
Jacoby, L. L., &Brooks, L. R. (1984). Nonanalytic cognition: Memory, perception, and concept formation. In G H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology oflearning and motivation (Vol. 18, pp. 1–47). New York: Academic Press.
Jacoby, L. L., &Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual leaming.Journal of experimental Psychology: General,110, 306–340.
Jacoby, L. L., &Hayman, C. A. G. (1987). Specific visual transfer in word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 456–463.
Johnston, J. C., &McClelland, J. L. (1974). Perception of letters in words: Seek not and ye shall find.Science,184, 1192–1194.
Kahneman, D., &Treisman, A. (1986). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman, R. Davies, & J. Beaty (Eds.),Varieties of attention (pp. 29–62). New York: Academic Press.
Kolers, P. A. (1979). A pattern-analyzing basis of recognition. InL S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing m human memory (pp. 363–384). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kolers, P. A., &Roediger, H. L. m. (1984). Procedures of mind.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 425–449.
Massaro, D. W., Venezky, R. L., &Taylor, G. A. (1979). Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processmg of letter strings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,168, 107–124.
McClelland, J. L. (1976). Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 80–91.
McClelland, J L., &Rumelhart, J. L. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407.
Morton, J. (1979). Facilitation in word recognition: Experiments causing change in the logogen models. In P. A. Kolers, M. E. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.),Processing of visible longuage (Vol. 1, pp. 259–268). New York: Plenum.
Murrell, G. A., &Morton, J. (1974). Word recognition and morphemic structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 963–968.
Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word-superiority effect.Psychological Review,89, 573–594.
Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55–86). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of the meaningfulness of stimulus material.Jour1UJ1 of Experimental Psychology,81, 275–280.
Rumelhart, D. E., &McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects rn letter perception. Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model.Psychological Review,89, 60–94.
Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., &Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,3, 1–17.
Smith, M. C (1979). Contextual facilitation In a letter search task depends on how the pnme is processed.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,5, 239–251.
Thompson, M. C., &Massaro, D. W. (1973). Visual Information and redundancy in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology,98, 49–54.
Thorndike, E. L., &Lorge, I. (1944).The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Columbia University Press.
Tulving, E., ScHacter, D L., &Stark, H A. (1982). Priming effects in word-fragment completion are Independent of recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 336–342.
Tweedy, J. R, Lapinski, R. H., &Schvaneveldt, R. W (1977) Semantic-context effects on word recognition. Influences of varying the proportion of items presented In an appropriate context.Memory & Cognuion,8, 84–89.
Wheeler, D D. (1970). Processes In word recognition,Cognitive Psychology,1, 59–85.
Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1987). Preservation of specific experiences in the representation of general knowledge.Journal of Expenmental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 3–17.
Whittlesea, B. W. A, &Cantwell, A. L. (1987) Enduring Influence of the purpose of experiences: Encoding-retrieval interactions in word and pseudoword perception.Memory & Cognition,15, 465–472
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Preparation of this article was supported by an NSERC grant to the second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hayman, C.A.G., Jacoby, L.L. Specific word transfer as a measure of processing in the word-superiority paradigm. Memory & Cognition 17, 125–133 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197062
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197062