Abstract
Three experiments were conducted to examine whether spatial iconicity affects semantic-relatedness judgments. Subjects made speeded decisions with regard to whether members of a simultaneously presented word pair were semantically related. In Experiment 1, the words were presented one above the other. In the experimental pair, the words denoted parts of larger objects (e.g., ATTIC-BASEMENT). The words were either in an iconic relation with their referents (e.g., ATTIC presented above BASEMENT) or in a reverse-iconic relation (BASEMENT above ATTIC). The reverse-iconic condition yielded significantly slower semantic-relatedness judgments than did the iconic condition. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that this effect did not occur when the words were presented horizontally, thus ruling out that the iconicity effect is due to the order in which the words are read. Two alternative explanations for this finding are discussed.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barsalou, L.W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,22, 577–660.
Cohen, J. [D.], MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., &Provost.J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
Jakobson, R. (1971).Selected writings: Vol. 2. Word and language. The Hague: Mouton.
Kellenbach, M. L.,Wijers, A. A., &Mulder, G. (2000). Visual semantic features are activated during the processing of concrete words: Event-related potential evidence for perceptual semantic priming.Cognitive Brain Research,10, 67–75.
Landauer, T. K., &Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge.Psychological Review,104, 211–240.
Langacker, R. W. (1999). On subjectification and grammaticization. In J.-P. Koenig (Ed.),Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 71–89). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Lu, C.-H., &Proctor, R.W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 174–207.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.Psychological Bulletin,109, 163–203.
Mandler, J. M. (1986). On the comprehension of temporal order.Language & Cognitive Processes,1, 309–320.
Mÿnte, T. F., Schiltz, K., &Kutas, M. (1998). When temporal terms belie conceptual order.Nature,395, 71–73.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998).The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Available at http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.
Paivio, A. (1986).Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1992).The essential Peirce: Vol. 1 (1867-1893) (N. Hauser & C. Kloesel, Eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Pulvermÿller, F. (1999). Words in the brain’s language.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,22, 253–336.
Rinck, M., &Bower, G. H. (2000). Temporal and spatial distance in situation models.Memory & Cognition,28, 1310–1320.
Sadoski, M., &Paivio, A. (2001).Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stanfield, R. A., &Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition.Psychological Science,12, 153–156.
Tranel, D., Damasio, H., &Damasio, A. R. (1997). A neural basis for the retrieval of conceptual knowledge.Neuropsychologia,35, 1319–1327.
White, B.W. (1969). Interference in identifying attributes and attribute names.Perception & Psychophysics,6, 166–168.
Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Processing narrative time shifts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1196–1207.
Zwaan, R. A., &Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory.Psychological Bulletin,123, 162–185.
Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., &Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Do language comprehenders routinely represent the shapes of objects?Psychological Science,13, 168–171.
Zwaan, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2003).Hemispheric differences in semantic-relatedness judgments. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant MH-63972 to R.A.Z.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zwaan, R.A., Yaxley, R.H. Spatial iconicity affects semantic relatedness judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10, 954–958 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196557
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196557