Abstract
Immediately after a stimulus appears in the visual field, there is often a short period of facilitated processing of stimuli at or near this location. This period is followed by one in which processing is impaired, rather than facilitated. This impairment has been termed inhibition of return (IOR). In the present study, the time course of this phenomenon was examined in two ways. (1) A graphical metaanalysis plotted the size of the effect as a function of the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) of the two stimuli. This analysis showed that IOR is impressively stable for SOAs of 300-1,600 msec. It also showed that the literature does not provide any clear sense of the duration of IOR. (2) An empirical approach was, therefore, taken to fill this gap in our knowledge of IOR. In three experiments, IOR was tested using SOAs between 600 and 4,200 msec. IOR was robust for approximately 3 sec and appeared to taper off after this point; the observed duration varied somewhat as a function of the testing conditions. In addition, for the first second, the degree of inhibition was inversely related to distance of the target from the original stimulus, but for the next 2 sec this spatial distribution was not observed. Theories of the mechanisms and function of IOR must conform to these spatial and temporal properties.
Article PDF
References
Abrams, R. A., Christ, S. E., & Smith, C. (1999, November).Objectand location-based inhibition of return in static and dynamic scenes. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.
Abrams, R. A., &Dobkin, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 467–477.
Bennett, P. J., &Pratt, J. (2001). The spatial distribution of inhibition of return.Psychological Science,12, 76–80.
Briand, K. A., Larrison, A. L., &Sereno, A. B. (2000). Inhibition of return in manual and saccadic response systems.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 1512–1524.
Cheal, M., Chastain, G., &Lyon, D. R. (1998). Inhibition of return in vision identification tasks.Visual Cognition,5, 365–388.
Collie, A., Maruff, P., Yucel, M., Danckert, J., &Currie, J. (2000). Spatiotemporal distribution of facilitation and inhibition of return arising from the reflexive orienting of covert attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1733–1745.
Danziger, S., &Kingstone, A. (1999). Unmasking the inhibition of return phenomenon.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1024–1037.
Danziger, S., Kingstone, A., &Snyder, J. J. (1998). Inhibition of return to successively stimulated locations in a sequential visual search paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1467–1475.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R.W., &Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1030–1044.
Gibson, B. S., &Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition and disinhibition of return: Evidence from temporal order judgments.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 669–680.
Jordan, H., &Tipper, S. P. (1998). Object-based inhibition of return in static displays.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 504–509.
Kingstone, A., &Pratt, J. (1999). Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1046–1054.
Klein, R.M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search.Nature, 334, 430–431.
Klein, R.M. (2000). Inhibition of return.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 138–147.
Klein, R. M., &MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search.Psychological Science,10, 346–352.
Lupiáñez, J., Milan, E. G., Tornay, F. J., Madrid, E., &Tudela, P. (1997). Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 1241–1254.
Lupiáñez, J., &Weaver, B. (1998). On the time course of exogenous cuing effects: A commentary on Tassinari et al. (1994).Vision Research,38, 1621–1623.
Maruff, P., Yucel, M., Danckert, J., Stuart, G., &Currie, J. (1999). Facilitation and inhibition arising from the exogenous orienting of covert attention depends on the temporal properties of spatial cues and targets.Neuropsychologia,37, 731–744.
Maylor, E. A., &Hockey, R. (1985). Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 777–787.
McDonald, J. J., Ward, L. M., &Kiehl, K. A. (1999). An eventrelated brain potential study of inhibition of return.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1411–1423.
Oonk, H. M., &Abrams, R. A. (1998). New perceptual objects that capture attention produce inhibition of return.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 510–515.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., &Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function.Cognitive Neuropsychology,2, 211–228.
Pratt, J. (1995). Inhibition of return in a discrimination task.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 117–120.
Pratt, J., &Abrams, R. A. (1999). Inhibition of return in discrimination tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 229–242.
Pratt, J., Adams, J. J., &McAuliffe, J. (1998). The spatial relationship between cues and targets mediates inhibition of return.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,52, 213–216.
Pratt, J., Hillis, J., &Gold, J. M. (2001). The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 489–495.
Pratt, J., Kingstone, A., &Khoe, W. (1997). Inhibition of return in location- and identity-based choice decision tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 964–971.
Pratt, J., Spalek, T. M., &Bradshaw, F. (1999). The time to detect targets at inhibited and noninhibited locations: Preliminary evidence for attentional momentum.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 730–746.
Rafal, R. D., Calabresi, P. A., Brennan, C. W., &Sciolto, T. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 673–685.
Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Jha, A. P., &Rosenquist, J. N. (1996). What is inhibited in inhibition of return?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 367–378.
Riggio, L., Bello, A., &Umiltà, C. (1998). Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of cue onset and offset.Psychological Research,61, 107–118.
Samuel, A. G. (1991). Perceptual degradation due to signal alternation: Implications for auditory pattern processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 392–403.
Samuel, A. G., & Kat, D. (2003).The spatial and temporal distribution of facilitation and inhibition following a salient visual event. Manuscript in preparation.
Samuel, A. G., &Weiner, S. K. (2001). Attentional consequences of object appearance and disappearance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 1433–1451.
Snyder, J. J., Schmidt, W. C., &Kingstone, A. (2001). Attentional momentum does not underlie the inhibition of return effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 1420–1432.
Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Peru, A., &Berlucchi, G. (1998). On the time course of exogenous cuing effects: A response to Lupiáñez and Weaver.Vision Research,38, 1625–1628.
Tassinari, G., &Berlucchi, G. (1993). Sensory and attentional components of slowing of manual reaction time to non-fixated visual targets by ipsilateral primes.Vision Research,33, 1525–1534.
Taylor, T. L., &Klein, R. M. (2000). Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1639–1656.
Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., &Weaver, B. (1991). Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,43A, 289–298.
Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Jerreat, L. M., &Burak, A. L. (1994). Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 478–499.
Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., &Watson F. L. (1995). Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial location: Commentary on Pratt and Abrams.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1289–1293.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Samuel, A.G., Kat, D. Inhibition of return: A graphical meta-analysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10, 897–906 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196550
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196550