Abstract
Picture#x2014;word interference studies typically show that semantically related distractor words embedded within a picture slow picture-naming responses, relative to unrelated ones. This semantic interference effect is commonly interpreted as arising from the competition of lexical#x2014;semantic (e.g., Schriefers, Meyer, & Levelt, 1990) or lexical#x2014;phonological (e.g., Starreveld & La Heij, 1996) codes. The experiment reported here tests a crucial assumption shared by these accounts#x2014;namely, that the effect reflects a lexical, rather than a nonverbal, conceptual conflict. Pictures were named while participants attempted to ignore embedded distractors that were in either verbal or pictorial format. The presence of both words and pictures substantially interfered with naming responses, but only words, not pictures, were found to induce semantic interference. These findings support the claim that for semantic interference to arise, both target picture and distractor have to be lexicalized. Consequently, a general conceptual locus of the effect can be excluded, and the claim that semantic interference is based on a lexical conflict is confirmed.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bloem, I., & La Heij, W. (2000, November).Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access. Paper presented at the 41st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
Bowers, J. S., Vigliocco, G., Stadthagen-Gonzales, H., &Vinson,D. (1999). Distinguishing language from thought: Experimental evidence that syntax is lexically rather than conceptually represented.Psychological Science,10, 310–315.
Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access?Cognitive Neuropsychology,14, 177–208.
Damian, M., &Martin, R. C. (1999). Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 345–361.
Dean, M. P., Bub, D. N., &Masson, M. E. J. (2001). Interference from related items in object identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 733–743.
Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.Psychological Review,93, 283–321.
Glaser, M. O., &Glaser, W. R. (1982). Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 875–894.
Glaser, W. R., &Düngelhoff, F.-J. (1984). The time course of picture#x2014; word interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 640–654.
Glaser, W. R., & Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 13–42.
Hagenaar, R., &van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1986). Target#x2014;noise separation in visual selective attention.Acta Psychologica,62, 161–176.
Humphreys, G. W., Lloyd-Jones, T. J., &Fias, W. (1995). Semantic interference effects on naming using a postcue procedure: Tapping the links between semantics and phonology with pictures and words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 961–980.
Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., &Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Cascade processes in picture identification.Cognitive Neuropsychology,5, 67–103.
La Heij, W. (1988). Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming.Memory & Cognition,16, 400–410.
La Heij, W., Helaha, D., &van den Hof, E. (1993). Why does blue hamper the naming of red? Color#x2014;color interference and the role of locational (un)certainty.Acta Psychologica,83, 159–177.
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., &Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,22, 1–75.
Logan, G. D., Zbrodoff, N. J., &Williamson, J. (1984). Strategies in the color#x2014;word Stroop task.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,22, 135–138.
Lupker, S. J., &Katz, A. N. (1981). Input, decision, and response factors in picture#x2014;word interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,7, 269–282.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.Psychological Bulletin,109, 163–203.
Masson, M. E. J., Bub, D. N., & Bukach, C. M. (2001, April).Differential contributions of functional and associative knowledge to object and word identification. Paper presented at the Annual Australian Experimental Psychology Conference, Melbourne.
McClain, L. (1983). Effects of response type and set size on Stroop color#x2014;word performance.Perceptual & Motor Skills,56, 735–743.
Posnansky, C. J., &Rayner, K. (1977). Visual-feature and response components in a picture#x2014;word interference task with beginning and skilled readers.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,24, 440–449.
Potter, M. C., &Faulconer, B. A. (1975). Time to understand pictures and words.Nature,253, 437–438.
Rayner, K., &Springer, C. J. (1986). Graphemic and semantic similarity effects in the picture#x2014;word interference task.British Journal of Psychology,77, 207–222.
Redding, G. M., &Gerjets, D. A. (1977). Stroop effect: Interference and facilitation with verbal and manual responses.Perceptual & Motor Skills,45, 11–17.
Roe, W. T., Wilsoncroft, W. E., &Griffiths, R. S. (1980). Effects of motor and verbal practice in the Stroop task.Perceptual & Motor Skills,50, 647–650.
Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking.Cognition,42, 107–142.
Roelofs, A. (1997). A case for nondecomposition in conceptually driven word retrieval.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,26, 33–67.
Roelofs, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal actions: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task.Psychological Review,110, 88–125.
Rosinski, R. R., Golinkoff, R. M., &Kukish, K. S. (1975). Automatic semantic processing in a picture#x2014;word interference task.Child Development,46, 247–253.
Schmit, V., &Davis, R. (1974). The role of hemispheric specialization in the analysis of Stroop stimuli.Acta Psychologica,38, 149–158.
Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., &Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture#x2014; word interference studies.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 86–102.
Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,6, 156–163.
Snodgrass, J. G., &McCullough, B. (1986). The role of visual similarity in picture categorization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 147–154.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 174–215.
Standing, L. (1973). Learning 10,000 pictures.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,25, 207–222.
Starreveld, P. A., &La Heij, W. (1996). Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 869–918.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 643–662.
van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1981).Short-term visual information forgetting. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Virzi, R. A., &Egeth, H. E. (1984). Is meaning implicated in illusory conjunctions?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 573–580.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Damian, M.F., Bowers, J.S. Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10, 111–117 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196474
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196474