Note—Accepted by David A. Balota’s editorial team.
Abstract
An a priori test of the difference engine model (Myerson, Hale, Zheng, Jenkins, & Widaman, 2003) was conducted using a large, diverse sample of individuals who performed three speeded verbal tasks and three speeded visuospatial tasks. Results demonstrated that, as predicted by the model, the group standard deviation (SD) on any task was proportional to the amount of processing required by that task. Both individual performances as well as those of fast and slow subgroups could be accurately predicted by the model using no free parameters, just an individual or subgroup’s mean z-score and the values of theoretical constructs estimated from fits to the group SDs. Taken together, these results are consistent with post hoc analyses reported by Myerson et al. and provide even stronger supporting evidence. In particular, the ability to make quantitative predictions without using any free parameters provides the clearest demonstration to date of the power of an analytic approach on the basis of the difference engine.
Article PDF
References
Battig, W. F., &Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms.Journal of Experimental Psychology,80, 1–46.
Carroll, J. B. (1993).Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factoranalytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., &Ferraro, F. R. (1999). Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: Implications for group differences in response latency.Psychological Bulletin,125, 777–799.
Hale, S., &Jansen, J. (1994). Global processing-time coefficients characterize individual and group differences in cognitive speed.Psychological Science,5, 384–389.
Jenkins, L., Myerson, J., Hale, S., &Fry, A. F. (1999). Individual and developmental differences in working memory across the life span.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 28–40.
Myerson, J., Hale, S., Zheng, Y., Jenkins, L., &Widaman, K. F. (2003). The difference engine: A model of diversity in speeded cognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 262–288.
Posner, M. I. (1978).Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ratcliff, R., &Smith, P. L. (2004). A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.Psychological Review,111, 333–367.
Ratcliff, R., Spieler, D., &McKoon, G. (2000). Explicitly modeling the effects of aging on response time.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 1–25.
Ratcliff, R., Spieler, D., &McKoon, G. (2004). Analysis of group differences in processing speed: Where are the models of processing?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 755–769.
Sternberg, R. J. (1977).Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Teichner, W. H., &Krebs, M. J. (1974). Laws of visual choice reaction time.Psychological Review,81, 75–98.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
A preliminary report of these findings was presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, J., Hale, S. & Myerson, J. Predicting the size of individual and. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 534–541 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194103
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194103