Abstract
Under many conditions, humans display a robust tendency to rely more on visual information than on other forms of sensory information. Colavita (1974) illustrated this visual dominance effect by showing that naive observers typically fail to respond to clearly suprathreshold tones if these are presented simultaneously with a visual target flash. In the present study, we demonstrate that visual dominance influences performance under more complex stimulation conditions and address the role played by attention in mediating this effect. In Experiment 1, we show the Colavita effect in the simple speeded detection of line drawings and naturalistic sounds, whereas in Experiment 2 we demonstrate visual dominance when the task targets (auditory, visual, or bimodal combinations) are embedded among continuous streams of irrelevant distractors. In Experiments 3–5, we address the consequences of varying the probability of occurrence of targets in each sensory modality. In Experiment 6, we further investigate the role played by attention on visual dominance by manipulating perceptual load in either the visual or the auditory modality. Our results demonstrate that selective attention to a particular sensory modality can modulate—although not completely reverse—visual dominance as illustrated by the Colavita effect.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bald, L., Berrien, F. K., Price, J. B., &Sprague, R. O. (1942). Errors in perceiving the temporal order of auditory and visual stimuli.Journal of Applied Psychology,26, 382–388.
Basil, M. D. (1994). Multiple resource theory: I. Application to television viewing.Communication Research,21, 177–207.
Battaglia, P. W., Jacobs, R. A., &Aslin, R. N. (2003). Bayesian integration of visual and auditory signals for spatial localization.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,20, 1391–1397.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958).Perception and communication. Elmsford, NJ: Pergamon.
Colavita, F. B. (1974). Human sensory dominance.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 409–412.
Colavita, F. B., Tomko, R., &Weisberg, D. (1976). Visual prepotency and eye orientation.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,8, 25–26.
Colavita, F. B., &Weisberg, D. (1979). A further investigation of visual dominance.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 345–347.
Cooper, R. (1998). Visual dominance and the control of action. In M. A. Gernsbacher & S. J. Derry (Eds.),Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 250–255). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Desimone, R., &Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.Annual Review of Neuroscience,18, 193–222.
Driver, J., &Frackowiak, R. S. J. (2001). Neurobiological measures of human selective attention.Neuropsychologia,39, 1257–1262.
Egeth, H. E., &Sager, L. C. (1977). On the locus of visual dominance.Perception & Psychophysics,22, 77–86.
Eimer, M. (2000). The time course of spatial orienting elicited by central and peripheral cues: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.Biological Psychology,53, 253–258.
Ernst, M. O., &Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion.Nature,415, 429–433.
Ernst, M. O., Banks, M. S., &Bülthoff, H. H. (2000). Touch can change visual slant perception.Nature Neuroscience,3, 69–73.
Ernst, M. O., &Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,8, 162–169.
Foree, D. D., &LoLordo, V. M. (1973). Attention in the pigeon: Differential effects of food-getting versus shock-avoidance procedures.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,85, 551–558.
Frassinetti, F., Bolognini, N., &Làdavas, E. (2002). Enhancement of visual perception by crossmodal visuo-auditory interaction.Experimental Brain Research,147, 332–343.
Giard, M. H., &Peronnet, F. (1999). Auditory-visual integration during multimodal object recognition in humans: A behavioral and electrophysiological study.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,11, 473–490.
Gilbert, R. M. (1969). Discrimination learning? In R. M. Gilbert & N. S. Sutherland (Eds.),Animal discrimination learning (pp. 455–489). New York: Academic Press.
Hohnsbein, J., Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., &Blanke, L. (1991). Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components: I. Simple and choice reaction tasks.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,78, 438–446.
Intons-Peterson, M. J. (1983). Imagery paradigms: How vulnerable are they to experimenters’ expectations?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 394–412.
Kanwisher, N. (2001). Faces and places: Of central (and peripheral) interest.Nature Neuroscience,4, 455–456.
Klein, R. M. (1977). Attention and visual dominance: A chronometric analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 365–378.
Kraemer, P. J., &Roberts, W. A. (1985). Short-term memory for simultaneously presented visual and auditory signals in the pigeon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,11, 137–151.
Kristofferson, A. B. (1967). Attention and psychophysical time.Acta Psychologíca,27, 93–100.
Lachter, J., Forster, K. I., &Ruthruff, E. (2004). Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): Still no identification without attention.Psychological Review,111, 880–913.
Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,9, 75–82.
Lederman, S. J., &Abbott, S. G. (1981). Texture perception: Studies of intersensory organization using a discrepancy paradigm, and visual versus tactual psychophysics.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 902–915.
Macaluso, E., &Driver, J. (2001). Spatial attention and crossmodal interactions between vision and touch.Neuropsychologia,39, 1304–1316.
McDonald, J. J., Teder-Sälejärvi, W. A., &Hillyard, S. A. (2000). Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception.Nature, 407, 906–908.
Meltzer, D., &Masaki, M. A. (1973). Measures of stimulus control and stimulus dominance.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,1, 28–30.
Morein-Zamir, S., Soto-Faraco, S., &Kingstone, A. (2003). Auditory capture of vision: Examining temporal ventriloquism.Cognitive Brain Research,17, 154–163.
Orne, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications.American Psychologist,17, 776–783.
Pallier, C., Dupoux, E., &Jeannin, X. (1997). EXPE: An expandable programming language for on-line psychological experiments.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,29, 322–327.
Partan, S., &Marler, P. (1999). Communication goes multimodal.Science,283, 1272–1273.
Pierce, A. H. (1908). The subconscious again.Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, & Scientific Methodology,5, 264–271.
Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., &Klein, R. M. (1976). Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance.Psychological Review,83, 157–171.
Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., &Ogden, W. C. (1978). Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In H. L. Pick, Jr. & E. Saltzman (Eds.),Modes of perceiving and processing information (pp. 137–157). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
Quinlan, P. [T.] (2000). The “late” locus of visual dominance.Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society,5, 64.
Quinlan, P. T., &Bailey, P. J. (1995). An examination of attentional control in the auditory modality: Further evidence for auditory orienting.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 614–628.
Randich, A., Klein, R. M., &LoLordo, V. M. (1978). Visual dominance in the pigeon.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 30, 129–137.
Rees, G., Frith, C. D., &Lavie, N. (2001). Processing of irrelevant visual motion during performance of an auditory task.Neuropsychologia, 39, 937–949.
Rees, G., Russell, C., Frith, C. D., &Driver, J. (1999). Inattentional blindness versus inattentional amnesia for fixated but ignored words.Science,286, 2504–2507.
Rock, I., &Harris, C. S. (1967, May 17). Vision and touch.Scientific American,216, 96–104.
Rock, I., &Victor, J. (1964). Vision and touch: An experimentally created conflict between the two senses.Science,143, 594–596.
Rodway, P. (2005). The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.Acta Psychologica,120, 199–226.
Sekuler, R., Sekuler, A. B., &Lau, R. (1997). Sound alters visual motion perception.Nature,385, 308.
Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., &Shimojo, S. (2000). Illusions: What you see is what you hear.Nature,408, 788.
Shapiro, K. L., Egerman, B., &Klein, R. M. (1984). Effects of arousal on human visual dominance.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 547–552.
Shapiro, K. L., Jacobs, W. J., &LoLordo, V. M. (1980). Stimulus-reinforcer interactions in Pavlovian conditioning of pigeons: Implications for selective associations.Animal Learning & Behavior,8, 586–594.
Shapiro, K. L., &Johnson, T. L. (1987). Effects of arousal on attention to central and peripheral visual stimuli.Acta Psychologica,66, 157–172.
Sinnett, S., Costa, A., &Soto-Faraco, S. (2006). Manipulating inattentional blindness within and across sensory modalities.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,59, 1425–1442.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 174–215.
Spence, C., Nicholls, M. E. R., &Driver, J. (2001). The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 330–336.
Spence, C., Shore, D. I., &Klein, R. M. (2001). Multisensory prior entry.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 799–832.
Spence, C., &Squire, S. (2003). Multisensory integration: Maintaining the perception of synchrony.Current Biology,13, R519-R521.
Titchener, E. B. (1908).Lectures on the elementary psychology of feeling and attention. New York: Macmillan.
Turatto, M., Benso, F., Galfano, G., &Umiltà, C. (2002). Nonspatial attentional shifts between audition and vision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 628–639.
Uetake, K., &Kudo, Y. (1994). Visual dominance over hearing in feed acquisition procedure of cattle.Applied Animal Behavior Science,42, 1–9.
Welch, R. B., &Warren, D. H. (1980). Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy.Psychological Bulletin,88, 638–667.
Welch, R. B., &Warren, D. H. (1986). Intersensory interactions. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. 1. Sensory processes and perception (chap. 25, pp. 1–36). New York: Wiley.
Whipple, G. M., Sanford, E. C., &Colegrove, F. W. (1899). On nearly simultaneous clicks and flashes: The time required for recognition: Notes on mental standards of length.American Journal of Psychology,10, 280–295.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by grants from the Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (TIN2004-04363-C03-02) to S.S.-F. and the Oxford McDonnell Pew Center for Cognitive Neuroscience to S.S.-F. and C.S.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sinnett, S., Spence, C. & Soto-Faraco, S. Visual dominance and attention: The Colavita effect revisited. Perception & Psychophysics 69, 673–686 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193770
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193770