Abstract
The concurrent maintenance of two visual working memory (VWM) arrays can lead to profound interference. It is unclear, however, whether these costs arise from limitations in VWM storage capacity (Fougnie & Maro is, 2006) or from interference between the storage of one visual array and encoding or retrieval of another visual array (Cowan & Morey, 2007). Here, we show that encoding a VWM array does not interfere with maintenance of another VWM array unless the two displays exceed maintenance capacity (Experiments 1 and 2). Moreover, manipulating the extent to which encoding and maintenance can interfere with one another had no discernable effect on dual-task performance (Experiment 2). Finally, maintenance of a VWM array was not affected by retrieval of information from another VWM array (Experiment 3). Taken together, these findings demonstrate that dual-task interference between two concurrent VWM tasks is due to a capacity-limited store that is independent from encoding and retrieval processes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvarez, G. A., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). The capacity of visual shortterm memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychological Science, 15, 106–111.
Alvarez, G. A., & Franconeri, S. L. (2007). How many objects can you attentively track? Evidence for a resource-limited tracking mechanism. Journal of Vision, 7(13, Art. 14), 1–10.
Awh, E., Barton, B., & Vogel, E. K. (2007). Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity. Psychological Science, 18, 622–628.
Awh, E., & Jonides, J. (2001). Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 119–126.
Awh, E., Jonides, J., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (1998). Rehearsal in spatial working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 780–790.
Awh, E., Vogel, E. K., & Oh, S. H. (2006). Interactions between attention and working memory. Neuroscience, 139, 201–208.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, D. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon.
Cantor, J., & Engle, R. W. (1993). Working-memory capacity as longterm memory activation: An individual-differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 1101–1114.
Cocchini, G., Logie, R. H., Della Sala, S., MacPherson, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (2002). Concurrent performance of two memory tasks: Evidence for domain-specific working memory systems. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1086–1095.
Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 87–114.
Cowan, N. (2006). Working memory capacity. New York: Psychology Press.
Cowan, N., & Morey, C. C. (2007). How can dual-task working memory retention limits be investigated? Psychological Science, 18, 686–688.
Craik, F. I., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 159–180.
Dell’Acqua, R., & Jolicoeur, P. (2000). Visual encoding of patterns is subject to dual-task interference. Memory & Cognition, 28, 184–191.
Dutta, A., Schweickert, R., Choi, S., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). Cross-task cross talk in memory and perception. Acta Psychologica, 90, 49–62.
Fougnie, D., & Marois, R. (2006). Distinct capacity limits for attention and working memory: Evidence from attentive tracking and visual working memory paradigms. Psychological Science, 17, 526–534.
Fougnie, D., & Marois, R. (2009). Attentive tracking disrupts feature binding in visual working memory. Visual Cognition, 17, 48–66.
Garavan, H. (1998). Serial attention within working memory. Memory & Cognition, 26, 263–276.
Han, S. H., & Kim, M. S. (2004). Visual search does not remain efficient when executive working memory is working. Psychological Science, 15, 623–628.
Irwin, D. E. (1992). Memory for position and identity across eye move ments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 307–317.
Irwin, D. E., & Gordon, R. D. (1998). Eye movements, attention and trans-saccadic memory. Visual Cognition, 5, 127–155.
Jolicoeur, P. (1999). Dual-task interference and visual encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 596–616.
Jolicoeur, P., & Dell’Acqua, R. (1998). The demonstration of shortterm consolidation. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 138–202.
Jolicoeur, P., & Dell’Acqua, R. (1999). Attentional and structural constraints on visual encoding. Psychological Research, 62, 154–164.
Kellogg, R. T., Cocklin, T., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (1982). Conscious attentional demands of encoding and retrieval from long-term memory. American Journal of Psychology, 95, 183–198.
Logie, R. H. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Luck, S. J., & Vecera, S. P. (2002). Attention: From tasks to mechanisms. In S. Yantis (Ed.), Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 235–286). New York: Wiley.
Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281.
Morey, C. C., & Cowan, N. (2005). When do visual and verbal memories conflict? The importance of working-memory load and retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 703–713.
Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I. M., Guez, J., & Dori, H. (1998). Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory: Further support for an asymmetry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1091–1104.
Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I. M., Perretta, J. G., & Tonev, S. T. (2000). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: The resiliency of retrieval processes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 609–625.
Naveh-Benjamin, M., Kilb, A., & Fisher, T. (2006). Concurrent task effects on memory encoding and retrieval: Further support for an asymmetry. Memory & Cognition, 34, 90–101.
Navon, D. (1984). Resources—A theoretical soup stone? Psychological Review, 91, 216–234.
Navon, D., & Miller, J. (1987). Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 435–448.
Oberauer, K. (2002). Access to information in working memory: Exploring the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 411–421.
Oberauer, K. (2003). Selective attention to elements in working memory. Experimental Psychology, 50, 257–269.
Oh, S.-H., & Kim, M.-S. (2004). The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 275–281.
Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 369–378.
Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220–244.
Postle, B. R., Awh, E., Jonides, J., Smith, E. E., & D’Esposito, M. (2004). The where and how of attention-based rehearsal in spatial working memory. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 194–205.
Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Storm, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3, 179–197.
Rensink, R. A. (2000). The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 17–42.
Rensink, R. A. (2002). Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 245–277.
Saults, J. S., & Cowan, N. (2007). A central capacity limit to the simultaneous storage of visual and auditory arrays in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 663–684.
Schmidt, B. K., Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2002). Voluntary and automatic attentional control of visual working memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 754–763.
Schneider, W. X. (1999). Visual-spatial working memory, attention, and scene representation: A neuro-cognitive theory. Psychological Research, 62, 220–236.
Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J. (1998). Neuroimaging analyses of human working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 12061–12068.
Smyth, M. M., & Scholey, K. A. (1994). Interference in immediate spatial memory. Memory & Cognition, 22, 1–13.
Todd, J. J., & Marois, R. (2004). Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature, 428, 751–754.
Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 92–114.
Wheeler, M. E., & Treisman, A. M. (2002). Binding in short-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 48–64.
Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2004). Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 269–274.
Woodman, G. F., & Vogel, E. K. (2005). Fractionating working memory: Consolidation and maintenance are independent processes. Psychological Science, 16, 106–113.
Woodman, G. F., Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full. Psychological Science, 12, 219–224.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by NIMH Grant R01-MH70776 to R.M.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fougnie, D., Marois, R. Dual-task interference in visual working memory: A limitation in storage capacity but not in encoding or retrieval. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71, 1831–1841 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.8.1831
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.8.1831