Abstract
The role of perceptual organization in the precision of attentional control was assessed in three experiments. Observers viewed circular arrays of disks that varied in density. One disk was cued, directing attention to that disk. A series of tones then indicated shifts of attention to the next disk that was of the same color (Experiments 1 and 2) or on the same depth plane (Experiment 3). In the homogeneous condition, all of the disks were the same color (Experiments 1 and 2) or on the same depth plane (Experiment 3). In the heterogeneous condition, the disks alternated in color (Experiments 1 and 2) or stereoscopically defined depth (Experiment 3). If the observers were able to limit attention to disks within a group, the effective density of the displays in the heterogeneous conditions should have been one half that in the homogeneous conditions. There was little evidence that the observers could do this, indicating a limited role of perceptual organization in the precision of attentional control.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bahcall, D. O., & Kowler, E. (1999). Attentional interference at small spatial separations. Vision Research, 39, 71–86.
Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 145–162.
Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 451–470.
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
Cave, K. R., & Bichot, N. P. (1999). Visuospatial attention: Beyond a spotlight model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 204–223.
Chen, Z. (1998). Switching attention within and between objects: The role of subjective organization. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 7–17.
Cutzu, F., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2003). The selective tuning model of attention: Psychophysical evidence for a suppressive annulus around an attended item. Vision Research, 43, 205–219.
Downing, C. J., & Pinker, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 171–187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Driver, J., & Baylis, G. C. (1989). Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 448–456.
Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A., & Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively-defined targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 32–39.
Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161–177.
Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1972). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 201–204.
Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225–240.
Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y. Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 583–597.
Fernandez-Duque, D., & Johnson, M. L. (1999). Attention metaphors: How metaphors guide the cognitive psychology of attention. Cognitive Science, 23, 83–116.
He, S., Cavanagh, P., & Intriligator, J. (1996). Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature, 383, 334–337.
He, S., Cavanagh, P., & Intriligator, J. (1997). Attentional resolution. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 115–121.
He, Z. J., & Nakayama, K. (1992). Surfaces versus features in visual search. Nature, 359, 231–233.
He, Z. J., & Nakayama, K. (1995). Visual attention to surfaces in three dimensional space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92, 11155–11159.
Hecht, L. N., & Vecera, S. P. (2007). Attentional selection of complex objects: Joint effects of surface uniformity and part structure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1205–1211.
Henderson, J. M., & Macquistan, A. D. (1993). The spatial distribution of attention following an exogenous cue. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 221–230.
Huang, L., & Pashler, H. (2007). A Boolean map theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 114, 599–631.
Intriligator, J., & Cavanagh, P. (2001). The spatial resolution of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 171–216.
Jiang, Y., Chun, M. M., & Marks, L. E. (2002). Visual marking: Selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 717–730.
Joyce, C. A., Gorodnitsky, I. F., King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (2002). Tracking eye fixations with electroocular and electroencephalographic recordings. Psychophysiology, 39, 607–618.
Juola, J. F., Bouwhuis, E. E., Cooper, C., & Warner, B. (1991). Control of attention around the fovea. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 125–141.
Kaptein, N. A., Theeuwes, J., & Van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1995). Search for a conjunctively defined target can be selectively limited to a color-defined subset of elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1053–1069.
Kramer, A. F., & Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 267–284.
LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1986). Variations in size of the visual field in which targets are presented: An attentional range effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 188–200.
LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96, 101–124.
Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476–490.
Marrara, M. T., & Moore, C. M. (2000). Role of perceptual organization while attending in depth. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 786–799.
Matsukura, M., & Vecera, S. P. (2006). The return of object-based attention: Selection of multiple-region objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 1163–1175.
McLeod, P., Driver, J., & Crisp, J. (1988). Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel. Nature, 332, 154–155.
Moore, C. M., & Egeth, H. (1998). How does feature-based attention affect visual processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1296–1310.
Moore, C. M., Elsinger, C. L., & Lleras, A. (2001). Visual attention and the apprehension of spatial relations: The case of depth. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 595–606.
Moore, C. M., & Fulton, C. (2005). The spread of attention to hidden portions of occluded surfaces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 301–306.
Moore, C. M., Lanagan-Leitzel, L. K., Chen, P., Halterman, R., & Fine, E. M. (2007). Nonspatial attributes of stimuli can influence spatial limitations of attentional control. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 363–371.
Moore, C. M., Lanagan-Leitzel, L. K., & Fine, E. M. (2008). Distinguishing between the precision of attentional localization and attentional resolution. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 573–582.
Moore, C. M., Yantis, S., & Vaughan, B. (1998). Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion. Psychological Science, 9, 104–110.
Mounts, J. R. W. (2000a). Attentional capture by abrupt onsets and feature singletons produces inhibitory surrounds. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1485–1493.
Mounts, J. R. W. (2000b). Evidence for suppressive mechanisms in attentional selection: Feature singletons produce inhibitory surrounds. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 969–983.
Nakayama, K., & He, Z. J. (1996). Attention to surfaces: Beyond a Cartesian understanding of focal attention. In T. V. Papathomas, C. Chubb, A. Gorea, & E. Kowler (Eds.), Early vision and beyond (pp. 181–188). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nakayama, K., He, Z. J., & Shimojo, S. (1995). Visual surface representation: A critical link between lower-level and higher-level vision. In S. M. Kosslyn & D. N. Osherson (Eds.), Visual cognition: An invitation to cognitive science (Vol. 2, pp. 1–70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Palmer, J., & Moore, C. M. (in press). Using a filtering task to measure the spatial extent of attention. Vision Research.
Palmer, S., & Rock, I. (1994). Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 29–55.
Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160–174.
Sagi, D., & Julesz, B. (1986). Enhanced detection in the aperture of focal attention during simple discrimination tasks. Nature, 321, 693–695.
Steinman, B. A., Steinman, S. B., & Lehmkuhle, S. (1995). Visual attention mechanisms show a center-surround organization. Vision Research, 35, 1859–1869.
Tipper, S. P., Lortie, C., & Baylis, G. C. (1992). Selective reaching: Evidence for action-centered attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 891–905.
Tsotsos, J. K., Culhane, S. M., Wai, W. Y. K., Lai, Y. H., Davis, N., & Nuflo, F. (1995). Modeling visual-attention via selective tuning. Artificial Intelligence, 78, 507–545.
Vecera, S. P., & Farah, M. (1994). Does visual attention select objects or locations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 146–160.
Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90–122.
Watson, S. E., & Kramer, A. F. (1999). Object-based visual selective attention and perceptual organization. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 31–49.
Young, L. R., & Sheena, D. (1975). Eye movement measurement techniques. American Psychologist, 30, 315–330.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The work reported here was supported in part by NIH Grant MH067793.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moore, C.M., Hein, E., Grosjean, M. et al. Limited influence of perceptual organization on the precision of attentional control. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71, 971–983 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.4.971
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.4.971