Abstract
It has been claimed that a genuinely abstract numerical representation would be capable of representing the numerosity of any set of discrete elements independently of the attributes of the individual elements. In practice, however, perceptual variables, such as element size, density, and others, affect numerosity judgment. In this study, we examined how perceptual variables affect the performance of numerosity judgments under the control of factors such as amount of practice and set size. In Experiment 1, we introduced the numerosity comparison task to less experienced observers in order to examine the effect of element size and array area. In Experiment 2, we examined whether and how practice would influence precision and accuracy in numerosity comparison and demonstrated that the effects of perceptual variables mostly disappeared. In Experiment 3, we examined whether the effect of practice could transfer to the performance in different stimulus conditions. Taking the results together, we demonstrate that differences in practice might be the source of inconsistent results for perceptual variables.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allik, J., & Tuulmets, T. (1991). Occupancy model of perceived numerosity. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 303–314.
Allik, J., Tuulmets, T., & Vos, P. G. (1991). Size invariance in visual number discrimination. Psychological Research, 53, 290–295.
Barth, H. C. (2008). Judgments of discrete and continuous quantity: An illusory Stroop effect. Cognition, 109, 251–266. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.002
Brannon, E. M. (2006). The representation of numerical magnitude. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16, 222–229.
Burgess, A., & Barlow, B. H. (1983). The precision of numerosity discrimination in arrays of random dots. Vision Research, 23, 811–820.
Cantlon, J. F., Brannon, E. M., Carter, E. J., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2006). Functional imaging of numerical processing in adults and 4-yold children. PLoS Biology, 4, e125.
Cantlon, J. F., Platt, M. L., & Brannon, E. M. (2009). Beyond the number domain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 83–91. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.007
Cappelletti, M., Barth, H., Fregni, F., Spelke, E. S., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2007). rTMS over the intraparietal sulcus disrupts numerosity processing. Experimental Brain Research, 179, 631–642.
Clearfield, M. W., & Mix, K. S. (1999). Number versus contour length in infants’ discrimination of small visual sets. Psychological Science, 10, 408–411.
Cordes, S., & Brannon, E. M. (2008). The difficulties of representing continuous extent in infancy: Using number is just easier. Child Development, 79, 476–489.
Cordes, S., & Brannon, E. M. (2009). The relative salience of discrete and continuous quantity in young infants. Developmental Science, 12, 453–463. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00781.x
Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dehaene, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Cohen, L. (1998). Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 355–361. doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01263-6
Durgin, F. H. (1995). Texture density adaptation and the perceived numerosity and distribution of texture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 149–169. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.1.149
Eger, E., Sterzer, P., Russ, M. O., Giraud, A. L., & Kleinschmidt, A. (2003). Supramodal number representation in human intraparietal cortex. Neuron, 37, 719–725.
Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 307–314. doi:10.1016/ j.tics.2004.05.002
Ginsburg, N. (1991). Numerosity estimation as a function of stimulus organization. Perception, 20, 681–686.
Ginsburg, N., & Nicholls, A. (1988). Perceived numerosity as a function of item size. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 67, 656–658.
Hollingsworth, W. H., Simmons, J. P., Coates, T. R., & Cross, H.A. (1991). Perceived numerosity as a function of array number, speed of array development, and density of array items. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 448–450.
Hurewitz, F., Gelman, R., & Schnitzer, B. (2006). Sometimes area counts more than number. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 19599–19604.
Krueger, L. E. (1972). Perceived numerosity. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 5–9.
Krueger, L. E. (1984). Perceived numerosity: A comparison of magnitude production, magnitude estimation, and discrimination judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 536–542.
Mix, K. S., Huttenlocher, J., & Levine, S. C. (2002). Multiple cues for quantification in infancy: Is number one of them? Psychological Bulletin, 128, 278–294.
Nieder, A., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Representation of number in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 32, 185–208.
Nieder, A., Freedman, D. J., & Miller, E. K. (2002). Representation of the quantity of visual items in the primate prefrontal cortex. Science, 297, 1708–1711.
Nieder, A., & Merten, K. (2007). A labeled-line code for small and large numerosities in the monkey prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 5986–5993.
Nieder, A., & Miller, E. K. (2003). Coding of cognitive magnitude: Compressed scaling of numerical information in the primate prefrontal cortex. Neuron, 37, 149–157. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01144-3
Peterson, S. A., & Simon, T. J. (2000). Computational evidence for the subitizing phenomenon as an emergent property of the human cognitive architecture. Cognitive Science, 24, 93–122. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(99)00022-1
Piazza, M., Izard, V., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Turning curves for approximate numerosity in the human intraparietal sulcus. Neuron, 44, 547–555.
Ross, J. (2003). Visual discrimination of number without counting. Perception, 32, 867–870.
Rousselle, L., Palmers, E., & Noel, M. P. (2004). Magnitude comparison in preschoolers: What counts? Influence of perceptual variables. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 57–84.
Shepard, R. N. (1981). Psychological relations and psychophysical scales: On the status of “direct” psychophysical measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 24, 21–57.
Shuman, M., & Spelke, E. (2006). Area and element size bias numerosity perception. Journal of Vision, 6(6), 777a.
Sophian, C., & Chu, Y. (2008). How do people apprehend large numerosities? Cognition, 107, 460–478. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.10.009
Tomonaga, M. (2008). Relative numerosity discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Evidence for approximate numerical representations. Animal Cognition, 11, 43–57.
Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101, 80–102.
van Oeffelen, M. P., & Vos, P. G. (1982). A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 163–170.
Vos, V. G., van Oeffelen, M. P., Tibosch, H. J., & Allik, J. (1988). Interactions between area and numerosity. Psychological Research, 50, 148–154. doi:10.1007/BF00310175
Whalen, J., Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (1999). Non-verbal counting in humans: The psychophysics of number representation. Psychological Science, 10, 130–137.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (20530660) provided by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science to the second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tokita, M., Ishiguchi, A. How might the discrepancy in the effects of perceptual variables on numerosity judgment be reconciled?. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72, 1839–1853 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.7.1839
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.7.1839