Abstract
When two targets (T1 and T2) are inserted into a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream of nontargets, observers are impaired at identifying T2 when it is presented within half a second after T1. This transient drop in performance, or attentional blink (AB), has been attributed to a temporary unavailability of task-critical processing resources. In the present study, we investigated how object-based attention modulates the AB, by presenting four synchronized RSVP streams in the corners of two rectangular bars (e.g., one above and one below fixation). The results from four experiments revealed that the AB increased within short temporal lags (of up to ∼400 msec) when T2 was presented on the same, rather than a different, bar as T1 (with T1–T2 spatial distance controlled for). Thus, the AB is seen to spread across entire object groupings, suggesting that the spatiotemporal resolution of attention is modulated by global-object information.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 109–127.
Conci, M., Müller, H. J., & Elliott, M. A. (2007). Closure of salient regions determines search for a collinear target configuration. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 32–47.
Drew, T., & Shapiro, K. L. (2006). Representational masking and the attentional blink. Visual Cognition, 13, 513–528.
Driver, J., & Baylis, C. G. (1989). Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 448–456.
Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501–517.
Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161–177.
Haimson, C., & Behrmann, M. (2001). Cued visual attention does not distinguish between occluded and occluding objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 496–503.
Hommel, B., Kessler, K., Schmitz, F., Gross, J., Akyürek, E., Shapiro, K., & Schnitzler, A. (2006). How the brain blinks: Towards a neurocognitive model of the attentional blink. Psychological Research, 70, 425–435.
Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. E. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms of selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53–113). San Diego: Academic Press.
Jefferies, L. N., Ghorashi, S., Kawahara, J.-I., & Di Lollo, V. (2007). Ignorance is bliss: The role of observer expectation in dynamic spatial tuning of the attentional focus. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 1162–1174.
Jiang, Y., & Chun, M. M. (2001). The influence of temporal selection on spatial selection and distractor interference: An attentional blink study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 664–679.
Jordan, H., & Tipper, S. P. (1999). Spread of inhibition across an objects’surface. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 495–507.
Juola, J. F., Botella, J., & Palacios, A. (2004). Task- and location-switching effects on visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1303–1317.
Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. A. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29–61). New York: Academic Press.
Kawahara, J.-I., & Yamada, Y. (2006). Two noncontiguous locations can be attended concurrently: Evidence from the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 594–599.
Kellie, F. J., & Shapiro, K. L. (2004). Object file continuity predicts attentional blink magnitude. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 692–712.
Kim, C.-Y., & Blake, R. (2005). Psychophysical magic: Rendering the visible “invisible.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 381–388.
Klein, R. M., & Dick, B. (2002). Temporal dynamics of reflexive attention shifts: A dual-stream rapid serial visual presentation exploration. Psychological Science, 13, 176–179.
Kristjánsson, A., & Nakayama, K. (2002). The attentional blink in space and time. Vision Research, 42, 2039–2050.
Lamy, D., & Egeth, H. (2002). Object-based selection: The role of attentional shifts. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 52–66.
List, A., & Robertson, L. C. (2007). Inhibition of return and object-based attentional selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 1322–1334.
Moore, C. M., & Fulton, C. (2005). The spread of attention to hidden portions of occluded surfaces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 301–306.
Moore, C. M., Yantis, S., & Vaughan, B. (1998). Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion. Psychological Science, 9, 104–110.
O’Grady, R. B., & Müller, H. J. (2000). Object-based selection operates on a grouped array of locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1655–1667.
Olivers, C. N. L., & Meeter, M. (2008). A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention. Psychological Review, 115, 836–863.
Palmer, S. E. (1992). Common region: A new principle of perceptual grouping. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 436–447.
Palmer, S. [E.], & Rock, I. (1994). Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 29–55.
Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.
Potter, M. C., Staub, A., & O’Connor, D. H. (2002). The time course of competition for attention: Attention is initially labile. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1149–1162.
Raymond, J. E. (2003). New objects, not new features, trigger the attentional blink. Psychological Science, 14, 54–59.
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 849–860.
Shapiro, K. L., Raymond, J. E., & Arnell, K. M. (1997). The attentional blink. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 291–296.
Shih, S.-I. (2000). Recall of two visual targets embedded in RSVP streams of distractors depends on their temporal and spatial relationship. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1348–1355.
Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., & Weaver, B. (1991). Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289–298.
Vecera, S. P., & Farah, M. J. (1994). Does visual attention select objects or locations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 146–160.
Visser, T. A. W., Bischof, W. F., & Di Lollo, V. (1999). Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains: Evidence from the attentional blink. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 458–469.
Visser, T. A. W., Zuvic, S. M., Bischof, W. F., & Di Lollo, V. (1999). The attentional blink with targets in different spatial locations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 432–436.
Ward, R., Duncan, J., & Shapiro, K. (1997). Effects of similarity, difficulty, and nontarget presentation on the time course of visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 593–600.
Watson, S. E., & Kramer, A. F. (1999). Object-based visual selective attention and perceptual organization. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 31–49.
Yamada, Y., & Kawahara, J.-I. (2007). Dividing attention between two different categories and locations in rapid serial visual presentations. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 1218–1229.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Research Group (FOR 480) and CoTeSys Excellence Cluster (142) grants.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Conci, M., Müller, H.J. The “beam of darkness”: Spreading of the attentional blink within and between objects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71, 1725–1738 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.8.1725
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.8.1725