Abstract
Wang (2004) showed that people do not always simultaneously update their relationships to real and imagined environments in a dual-environment situation. Employing the same paradigm, we examined whether spatial updating operates on virtual reality as it does on a real or fictitious environment. Participants learned target locations in a real room and a virtual kitchen. Then they turned to face targets either in the room or in the kitchen, while blindfolded, and pointed to the targets before and after turning. Participants kept track of their orientation in both environments equally efficiently, regardless of explicit instructions. In contrast, when the real environment was described verbally but not directly perceived, participants automatically updated the virtual kitchen but not the room. These results suggest that people automatically update a virtual environment as they do a real one when the two environments are superimposed. The automaticity of spatial updating is discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amorim, M.-A., Glasauer, S., Corpinot, K., & Berthoz, A. (1997). Updating an object's orientation and location during nonvisual navigation: A comparison between two processing modes. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 404–418.
Avraamides, M. N. (2003). Spatial updating of environments described in texts. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 402–431.
Bakker, N. H., Werkhoven, P. J., & Passenier, P. O. (1999). The effects of proprioceptive and visual feedback on geographical orientation in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 8, 36–53.
Chance, S. S., Gaunet, F., Beall, A. C., & Loomis, J. M. (1998). Locomotion mode affects the updating of objects encountered during travel: The contribution of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs to path integration. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 7, 168–178.
de Vega, M., & Rodrigo, M. J. (2001). Updating spatial layouts mediated by pointing and labeling under physical and imaginary rotation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 369–393.
Easton, R. D., & Sholl, M. J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 483–500.
Etienne, A. S., Maurer, R., & Seguinot, V. (1996). Path integration in mammals and its interaction with visual landmarks. Journal of Experimental Biology, 199, 201–209.
Farrell, M. J., Arnold, P., Pettifer, S., Adams, J., Graham, T., & MacManamon, M. (2003). Transfer of route learning from virtual to real environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 219–227.
Farrell, M. J., & Robertson, I. H. (1998). Mental rotation and automatic updating of body-centered spatial relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 227–233.
Farrell, M. J., & Thomson, J. A. (1998). Automatic spatial updating during locomotion without vision. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 637–654.
Grant, S. C., & Magee, L. E. (1998). Contributions of proprioception to navigation in virtual environments. Human Factors, 40, 489–497.
Heeter, C. (1992). Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 1, 262–271.
Held, R. M., & Durlach, N. I. (1992). Telepresence. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 1, 109–112.
Hirtle, S. C., & Jonides, J. (1985). Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps. Memory & Cognition, 13, 208–217.
Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., Beall, A. C., Chance, S. S., & Golledge, R. G. (1998). Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychological Science, 9, 293–298.
Lathrop, W. B., & Kaiser, M. K. (2002). Perceiving orientation in physical and virtual environments: Changes in perceived orientation as a function of idiothetic information available. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 11, 19–32.
Loomis, J. M. (1992). Distal attribution and presence. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 1, 113–119.
Loomis, J. M., Blascovich, J. J., & Beall, A. C. (1999). Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 557–564.
May, M., & Klatzky, R. L. (2000). Path integration while ignoring irrelevant movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 169–186.
McNamara, T. P. (1986). Mental representations of spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 87–121.
Mittelstaedt, M.-L., & Mittelstaedt, H. (1980). Homing by path integration in a mammal. Naturwissenschaften, 67, 566–567.
Müller, M., & Wehner, R. (1988). Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 85, 5287–5290.
Müller, M., & Wehner, R. (1994). The hidden spiral: Systematic search and path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 175, 525–530.
Pausch, R., Proffitt, D., & Williams, G. (1997). Quantifying immersion in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (pp. 13–18). New York: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley.
Presson, C. C., & Montello, D. R. (1994). Updating after rotation and translational body movements: Coordinate structure of perspective space. Perception, 23, 1447–1455.
Regolin, L., Vallortigara, G., & Zanforlin, M. (1995). Detour behaviour in the domestic chick: Searching for a disappearing prey or a disappearing social partner. Animal Behaviour, 50, 203–211.
Riecke, B. E., Cunningham, D. W., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2007). Spatial updating in virtual reality: The sufficiency of visual information. Psychological Research, 71, 298–313.
Riecke, B. E., von der Heyde, M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Spatial updating in real and virtual environments: Contribution and interaction of visual and vestibular cues. In Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (pp. 9–17). New York: ACM Press.
Riecke, B. E., von der Heyde, M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2005). Visual cues can be sufficient for triggering automatic, reflex-like spatial updating. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 2, 183–215.
Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 1157–1165.
Ruddle, R. A., Payne, S. J., & Jones, D. M. (1999). Navigating large-scale virtual environments: What differences occur between helmet-mounted and desk-top displays? Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 8, 157–168.
Schmidt, I., Collett, T. S., Dillier, F.-X., & Wehner, R. (1992). How desert ants cope with enforced detours on their way home. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 171, 285–288.
Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 1, 120–126.
Simons, D. J., & Wang, R. F. (1998). Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychological Science, 9, 315–320.
Stevens, A., & Coupe, P. (1978). Distortions in judged spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 422–437.
von Saint Paul, U. (1982). Do geese use path integration for walking home? In F. Papi & H. G. Wallraff (Eds.), Avian navigation (pp. 298–307). New York: Springer.
Waller, D., Montello, D. R., Richardson, A. E., & Hegarty, M. (2002). Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 1051–1063.
Wang, R. F. (2004). Between reality and imagination: When is spatial updating automatic? Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 68–76.
Wang, R. F., & Brockmole, J. R. (2003a). Human navigation in nested environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 398–404.
Wang, R. F., & Brockmole, J. R. (2003b). Simultaneous spatial updating in nested environments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 981–986.
Wang, R. F., Crowell, J. A., Simons, D. J., Irwin, D. E., Kramer, A. F., Ambinder, M. S., et al. (2006). Spatial updating relies on an egocentric representation of space: Effects of the number of objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 281–286.
Wang, R. F., & Simons, D. J. (1999). Active and passive scene recognition across views. Cognition, 70, 191–210.
Wehner, R., & Srinivasan, M. V. (1981). Searching behavior of desert ants, genus Cataglyphis (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). Journal of Comparative Physiology, 142, 315–338.
Williams, B., Narasimham, G., Westerman, C., Rieser, J., & Bodenheimer, B. (2007). Functional similarities in spatial representations between real and virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 4, 1–22.
Wraga, M., Creem-Regehr, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2004). Spatial updating of virtual displays during self- and display rotation. Memory & Cognition, 32, 399–415.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NSF Grant BCS 03-17681 to R.F.W. Some of the data were presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Toronto, 2005.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wan, X.I., Wang, R.F. & Crowell, J.A. Spatial updating in superimposed real and virtual environments. Perception, & Psychophysics 71, 42–51 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.1.42
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.1.42