遗传 ›› 2009, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (9): 896-902.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1005.2009.00896

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

DNA水平上检测正选择方法的研究进展

林栲;李海鹏   

  1. 中国科学院-德国马普学会计算生物学伙伴研究所, 上海 200031

  • 收稿日期:2009-01-15 修回日期:2009-04-19 出版日期:2009-09-10 发布日期:2009-09-10
  • 通讯作者: 李海鹏

Advances in detecting positive selection on genome

LIN Kao, LI Hai-Peng   

  1. CAS-MPG Partner Institute for Computational Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China

  • Received:2009-01-15 Revised:2009-04-19 Online:2009-09-10 Published:2009-09-10
  • Contact: Haipeng Li

摘要:

达尔文的自然选择学说指出, 自然选择作用是物种进化的主要因素。而1968年Kimura提出的中性进化学说认为中性突变和随机漂变才是进化的主要动力。在接下来的30多年时间中, 人们尝试从各种角度来检测自然选择是否存在。随着DNA测序技术的发展, 大量的DNA序列信息为检验自然选择提供了丰富的数据。因为自然选择会影响DNA变异模式, 所以可以通过分析现有的DNA样本来推断过去是否发生了自然选择。另一方面, 种群历史等因素也会影响到DNA变异模式, 因此会对自然选择的检测产生干扰。文章主要介绍了中性检验基本的概念, 全面回顾了一些经典的检验方法, 并着重介绍了近几年新发展出的研究方向。

关键词: 中性检验, 自然选择, DNA水平

Abstract:

After Darwin’s natural selection theory emerged, Kimura proposed the theory of neutral evolution in 1968, which considered neutral mutations and random genetic drift as the major evolutionary forces. In the following years, various kinds of methods were developed to test whether natural selection has ever happened. With the improvement of DNA sequencing technologies, large amount of DNA sequence polymorphism data is available, providing a mass of materials for testing the natural selection theory. Since natural selection would leave its footprint on the genome, we are able to refer the adaptive evolutionary history of a population. On the other hand, population demographic history and other evolutionary forces may affect DNA polymorphic pattern in similar way, which may interfere with tests. In this paper, we summarized some basic concepts of neutral test, and briefly introduced some classical methods. Focus was given to several recently developed methods.