Methods Inf Med 2017; 56(04): 308-318
DOI: 10.3414/ME16-01-0084
Paper
Schattauer GmbH

Can Statistical Machine Learning Algorithms Help for Classification of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Severity to Optimal Utilization of Polysomno graphy Resources?[*]

Selen Bozkurt
1   Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Akdeniz Universitesi, Antalya, Turkey
,
Asli Bostanci
2   Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Akdeniz Universitesi, Antalya, Turkey
,
Murat Turhan
2   Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Akdeniz Universitesi, Antalya, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Funding This project was supported by the Akdeniz University Research Foundation Antalya, Turkey (Project Number: TSA-2016-1575).
Further Information

Publication History

received: 21 July 2016

accepted in revised form: 03 March 2017

Publication Date:
24 January 2018 (online)

Summary

Objectives: The goal of this study is to evaluate the results of machine learning methods for the classification of OSA severity of patients with suspected sleep disorder breathing as normal, mild, moderate and severe based on non-polysomnographic variables: 1) clinical data, 2) symptoms and 3) physical examination.

Methods: In order to produce classification models for OSA severity, five different machine learning methods (Bayesian network, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Neural Networks and Logistic Regression) were trained while relevant variables and their relationships were derived empirically from observed data. Each model was trained and evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation and to evaluate classification performances of all methods, true positive rate (TPR), false positive rate (FPR), Positive Predictive Value (PPV), F measure and Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristics curve (ROC-AUC) were used.

Results: Results of 10-fold cross validated tests with different variable settings promisingly indicated that the OSA severity of suspected OSA patients can be classified, using non-polysomnographic features, with 0.71 true positive rate as the highest and, 0.15 false positive rate as the lowest, respectively. Moreover, the test results of different variables settings revealed that the accuracy of the classification models was significantly improved when physical examination variables were added to the model.

Conclusions: Study results showed that machine learning methods can be used to estimate the probabilities of no, mild, moderate, and severe obstructive sleep apnea and such approaches may improve accurate initial OSA screening and help referring only the suspected moderate or severe OSA patients to sleep laboratories for the expensive tests.

* Supplementary material published on our website https://doi.org/10.3414/ME16-01-0084


 
  • References

  • 1 Punjabi NM. The epidemiology of adult obstructive sleep apnea. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society 2008; 5: 136-143.
  • 2 Young T, Peppard PE, Gottlieb DJ. Epidemiology of obstructive sleep apnea: a population health perspective. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 165: 1217-1239.
  • 3 Berry RB, Budhiraja R, Gottlieb DJ. et al. Rules for scoring respiratory events in sleep: update of the 2007 AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events. Deliberations of the Sleep Apnea Definitions Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. J Clin Sleep Med 2012; 8: 597-619.
  • 4 Tang B, Yan W. A Novel Model Using Generalized Regression Neural Network (Grnn) For Estimating Sleep Apnea Index in The Elderly Suffering from Sleep Disturbance. Int J Med Biol Front 2011; 17: 313.
  • 5 Ustun B, Westover M, Rudin C, Bianchi M. Clinical Prediction Models for Sleep Apnea: The Importance of Medical History over Symptoms. J Clin Sleep Med: JCSM 2016; 12 (02) 161-168.
  • 6 Bouloukaki I, Kapsimalis F, Mermigkis C. et al. Prediction of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in a large Greek population. Sleep Breath 2011; 15: 657-664.
  • 7 Eiseman NA, Westover MB, Mietus JE, Thomas RJ, Bianchi MT. Classification algorithms for predicting sleepiness and sleep apnea severity. J Sleep Res 2012; 21: 101-112.
  • 8 Ghandeharioun H, Rezaeitalab F, Lotfi R. Accurate Estimation of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Severity Using Non-Polysomnographic Features for Home- Based Screening. Iran J Public Health 2015; 44: 1433-1435.
  • 9 Kirby SD, Eng P, Danter W. et al. Neural network prediction of obstructive sleep apnea from clinical criteria. Chest 1999; 116: 409-415.
  • 10 Musman S, Passos VM DA, Silva IB R, Barreto SM. Evaluation of a prediction model for sleep apnea in patients submitted to polysomnography. J Bras Pneumol 2011; 37: 75-84.
  • 11 Karamanli H, Yalcinoz T, Yalcinoz MA, Yalcinoz T. A prediction model based on artificial neural networks for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath. 2015: 1-6.
  • 12 Pang Z, Liu D, Lloyd SR. Classification of Obstructive Sleep Apnea by Neural Networks. 4th International Symposium on Neural Networks. 2007: 1299-1308.
  • 13 Sun LM, Chiu HW, Chuang CY, Liu L. A prediction model based on an artificial intelligence system for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath 2011; 15: 317-323.
  • 14 Teferra RA, Grant BJ, Mindel JW. et al. Cost minimization using an artificial neural network sleep apnea prediction tool for sleep studies. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2014; 11: 1064-1074.
  • 15 Farney RJ, Walker BS, Farney RM, Snow GL, Walker JM. The STOP-Bang equivalent model and prediction of severity of obstructive sleep apnea: relation to polysomnographic measurements of the apnea/hypopnea index. J Clin Sleep Med 2011; 7: 459-465B.
  • 16 Ting H, Mai YT, Hsu HC, Wu HC, Tseng MH. Decision tree based diagnostic system for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea. J Med Syst 2014; 38: 94.
  • 17 Flemons WW, Mcnicholas WT. Clinical prediction of the sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep medicine reviews 1997; 1: 19-32.
  • 18 Tsai WH, Remmers JE, Brant R, Flemons WW, Davies J, Macarthur C. A decision rule for diagnostic testing in obstructive sleep apnea. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med 2003; 167: 1427-1432.
  • 19 Zonato AI, Bittencourt LR, Martinho FL, Junior JF, Gregorio LC, Tufik S. Association of systematic head and neck physical examination with severity of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome. Laryngoscope 2003; 113: 973-980.
  • 20 Nuckton TJ, Glidden DV, Browner WS, Claman DM. Physical examination: Mallampati score as an independent predictor of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 2006; 29: 903-908.
  • 21 Sahin M, Bilgen C, Tasbakan MS, Midilli R, Basoglu OK. A clinical prediction formula for apnea-hypopnea index. Int J Otolaryngol. 2014: 438376.
  • 22 Pereira Rodrigues P, Ferreira Santos D, Leite L. Obstructive Sleep Apnea Diagnosis: The Bayesian Network Model Revisited. Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), 2015 IEEE 28th International Symposium on.. IEEE; 2015: 115-120.
  • 23 World Health Organization. BMI classification. Global database on body mass index. 2006 Available from: http://apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp?in-troPage=intro_3.html.
  • 24 Petry NM. A comparison of young, middle-aged, and older adult treatment-seeking pathological gamblers. The Gerontologist 2002; 42: 92-99.
  • 25 Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep 1991; 14: 540-545.
  • 26 Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten IH. The WEKA data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD explorations newsletter 2009; 11: 10-18.
  • 27 Friedman N, Geiger D, Goldszmidt M. Bayesian network classifiers. Machine Learning 1997; 29: 131.
  • 28 Kohonen T. Learning vector quantization. The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks.. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1995: 537-540.
  • 29 Norsys Software Corp. 1992-2016, Netica version 5.04 [cited 2016 March]. Available from: www.norsys.com.
  • 30 Huang J, Ling CZ. Using AUC and accuracy in evaluating learning algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 2005; 17: 299-310.
  • 31 Delong ER, Delong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44: 837-845.
  • 32 Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. New York: Springer; 2009
  • 33 Ferri C, Hernández-Orallo J, Modroiu R. An experimental comparison of performance measures for classification. Pattern Recognition Letters 2009; 30 (01) 27-38.
  • 34 Montoya FS, Bedialauneta JRI, Larracoechea UA, Ibargüen AM, Del Rey AS, Fernandez JMS. The predictive value of clinical and epidemiological parameters in the identification of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA): a clinical prediction algorithm in the evaluation of OSA. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 264: 637-643.
  • 35 Alan J, Brkic K, Bogunovic N. A review of feature selection methods with applications. Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), 2015 38th International Convention on.. IEEE; 2015
  • 36 Guyon I, André E. An introduction to variable and feature selection. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2003: 1157-1182.
  • 37 Wang D, Liangxiao J. An improved attribute selection measure for decision tree induction. Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, 2007. FSKD 2007. Fourth International Conference on.. 4 IEEE 2007
  • 38 Bianchi MT. Screening for obstructive sleep apnea: Bayes weighs in. Open Sleep J. 2009: 56-59.
  • 39 Mirrakhimov AE, Sooronbaev T, Mirrakhimov EM. Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in Asian adults: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Pulm Med 2013; 13: 10.