Next Article in Journal
Reliability Analysis of Survivable Networks under the Hostile Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Ostrowski Type Inequalities via Some Exponentially s-Preinvex Functions on Time Scales with Applications
Previous Article in Journal
A Stochastic Mathematical Model for Understanding the COVID-19 Infection Using Real Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
On the Dragomir Extension of Furuta’s Inequality and Numerical Radius Inequalities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Refined Hermite–Hadamard Inequalities and Some Norm Inequalities

Department of Mathematics, Josai University, 1-1, Keyakidai, Sakado 350-0295, Japan
Symmetry 2022, 14(12), 2522; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14122522
Submission received: 15 October 2022 / Revised: 28 October 2022 / Accepted: 21 November 2022 / Published: 29 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inequality and Symmetry in Mathematical Analysis)

Abstract

:
It is well known that the Hermite–Hadamard inequality (called the HH inequality) refines the definition of convexity of function f ( x ) defined on [ a , b ] by using the integral of f ( x ) from a to b. There are many generalizations or refinements of HH inequality. Furthermore HH inequality has many applications to several fields of mathematics, including numerical analysis, functional analysis, and operator inequality. Recently, we gave several types of refined HH inequalities and obtained inequalities which were satisfied by weighted logarithmic means. In this article, we give an N-variable Hermite–Hadamard inequality and apply to some norm inequalities under certain conditions. As applications, we obtain several inequalities which are satisfied by means defined by symmetry. Finally, we obtain detailed integral values.
MSC:
Primary 26D15; secondary 26B25

1. Introduction

A function, f : [ a , b ] R R , is said to be convex on [ a , b ] if the inequality
f ( x + y 2 ) f ( x ) + f ( y ) 2
holds for all x , y [ a , b ] . If the inequality (1) reverses, then f is said to be concave on [ a , b ] . Let f : [ a , b ] R R be a convex function on an interval [ a . b ] . Then,
f ( a + b 2 ) 1 b a a b f ( t ) d t f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 .
This double inequality is known in the literature as the Hermite–Hadamard integral inequality for convex functions. It has many applications in different areas of pure and applied mathematics. For some references about this latter point, we can consult [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Recently, we obtained the following two refined Hermite–Hadamard inequalities in order to obtain inequalities stronger than (2).
Theorem 1
([11]). Let f ( x ) be a convex function on [ a , b ] . Then, for any m , n N { 0 }
f ( a + b 2 ) L f , n ( 1 ) ( a , b ) 1 b a a b f ( t ) d t = 0 1 f ( ( 1 t ) a + t b ) d t L f , m ( 2 ) ( a , b ) f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 ,
where
L f , n ( 1 ) ( a , b ) = 1 2 n k = 1 2 n f ( ( 1 2 k 1 2 n + 1 ) a + 2 k 1 2 n + 1 b )
and
L f , m ( 2 ) ( a , b ) = 1 2 m + 1 { f ( a ) + f ( b ) + 2 k = 1 2 m 1 f ( ( 1 k 2 m ) a + k 2 m b ) } .
Theorem 2
([11]). Let f ( x ) be a convex function on [ a , b ] . Then, for any v [ 0 , 1 ] and m , n N { 0 } ,
f ( a + b 2 ) r f , v , n ( 1 ) ( a , b ) 1 b a a b f ( t ) d t = 0 1 f ( ( 1 t ) a + t b ) d t r f , v , m ( 2 ) ( a , b ) f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 ,
where
r f , v , n ( 1 ) ( a , b ) = 1 2 n k = 1 2 n { v f ( ( 1 ( 2 k 1 ) v 2 n + 1 ) a + ( 2 k 1 ) v 2 n + 1 b ) } + 1 2 n k = 1 2 n { ( 1 v ) f ( ( 1 v ( 2 k 1 ) ( 1 v ) 2 n + 1 ) a + ( v + ( 2 k 1 ) ( 1 v ) 2 n + 1 b ) }
and
r f , v , m ( 2 ) ( a , b ) = 1 2 m + 1 v f ( a ) + ( 1 v ) f ( b ) + f ( ( 1 v ) a + v b ) + 1 2 m k = 1 2 m 1 { v f ( ( 1 k v 2 m ) a + k v 2 m b ) + ( 1 v ) f ( ( 1 v k ( 1 v ) 2 m ) a + ( v + k ( 1 v ) 2 m ) b ) } .
In Section 2, we try to obtain an N-variable Hermite–Hadamard inequality. As applications we obtain several inequalities satisfied by arithmetic mean, geometric mean, logarithmic mean, harmonic mean, and so on. These means have the properties of symmetry. In Section 3, we obtain some norm inequalities. In Section 4, we obtain integral values of the Hermite–Hadamard inequality under some norm conditions.

2. N -Variable Hermite–Hadamard Inequality

We need the following result.
Lemma 1.
Let x 1 , x 2 , , x N R or x 1 , x 2 , , x N X , where X is a linear space. Then,
i = 1 N x i = 1 N 1 i < j ( x i + x j ) .
Proof. 
i = 1 N x i = 1 2 i = 1 N x i + j = 1 N x j = 1 2 N i = 1 N j = 1 N ( x i + x j ) = 1 2 N 2 i = 1 N x i + i j ( x i + x j ) = 1 N i = 1 N x i + 1 2 N i < j ( x i + x j ) + i > j ( x i + x j ) = 1 N i = 1 N x i + 1 N i < j ( x i + x j ) .
Then,
( 1 1 N ) i = 1 N x i = 1 N i < j ( x i + x j ) .
That is
i = 1 N x i = 1 N 1 i < j ( x i + x j ) .
We have the following N-variable Hermite–Hadamard inequality.
Theorem 3.
Let f ( x ) be a convex function on R and let x 1 , x 2 , , x N R . Then, for any m , n R { 0 } ,
f ( 1 N i = 1 N x i ) 2 N ( N 1 ) i < j L f , n ( 1 ) ( x i , x j ) 2 N ( N 1 ) i < j 0 1 f ( ( 1 t ) x i + t x j ) d t 2 N ( N 1 ) i < j L f , m ( 2 ) ( x i , x j ) 1 N i = 1 N f ( x i ) .
Proof. 
By Lemma 1 and the convexity of f ( x ) ,
f ( 1 N i = 1 N x i ) = f ( 1 N ( N 1 ) i < j ( x i + x j ) ) = f ( 2 N ( N 1 ) i < j x i + x j 2 ) 2 N ( N 1 ) i < j f ( x i + x j 2 ) .
By (3),
2 N ( N 1 ) i < j f ( x i + x j 2 ) 2 N ( N 1 ) i < j L f , n ( 1 ) ( x i , x j ) 2 N ( N 1 ) i < j 0 1 f ( ( 1 t ) x i + t x j ) d t 2 N ( N 1 ) i < j L f , m ( 2 ) ( x i , x j ) 2 N ( N 1 ) i < j f ( x i ) + f ( x j ) 2
By using Lemma 1 again, we have the last inequality. □
When f ( x ) = log x , we have the following corollary.
Corollary 1.
Let f ( x ) = log x and let x i > 0 ( 1 i N ) . We suppose that x i x j for i j . Then,
log 1 N i = 1 N x i 2 N ( N 1 ) i < j x i log x i x j x i x j log x j x j x i + 1 1 N i = 1 N log x i .
That is
1 N i = 1 N x i exp 2 N ( N 1 ) i < j { x i log x i x i x j + x j log x j x j x i 1 } i = 1 N x i 1 / N .
When f ( x ) = e x , we have the following corollary.
Corollary 2.
Let f ( x ) = e x . We suppose that x i x j for i j . Then,
e x p { 1 N i = 1 N x i } 2 N ( N 1 ) i < j e x j e x i x j x i 1 N i = 1 N e x i .
When f ( x ) = x 1 , we have the following corollary.
Corollary 3.
Let f ( x ) = x 1 and let x i > 0 ( 1 i N ) . We suppose that x i x j for i j . Then,
1 N i = 1 N x i 1 2 N ( N 1 ) i < j log x j log x i x j x i 1 N i = 1 N x i 1 .
That is
1 N i = 1 N x i 2 N ( N 1 ) i < j x j x i log x j log x i 1 1 1 N i = 1 N x i 1 1 .
When f ( x ) = x 2 , we have the following corollary.
Corollary 4.
Let f ( x ) = x 2 . Then,
1 N i = 1 N x i 2 2 3 N ( N 1 ) i < j ( x j 2 + x j x i + x i 2 ) 1 N i = 1 N x i 2 .

3. Some Norm Inequalities

We put a = 0 and b = 1 in (2). Then, we have
f ( 1 2 ) 0 1 f ( t ) d t f ( 0 ) + f ( 1 ) 2 .
Furthermore by (3), we have
f ( 1 2 ) 1 2 n k = 1 2 n f ( 2 k 1 2 n + 1 ) 0 1 f ( t ) d t 1 2 m + 1 { f ( 0 ) + f ( 1 ) + 2 k = 1 2 m 1 f ( k 2 m ) } f ( 0 ) + f ( 1 ) 2 .
Now, we suppose that F ( x ) is a convex and monotone increasing function on [ 0 , ) . We put f ( t ) = F ( ( 1 t ) x + t y ) , where x , y X and X is a Banach space with norm · . Then, f ( t ) is convex on [ 0 , 1 ] . Because for any t , s [ 0 , 1 ] and for any α , β 0 satisfying α + β = 1 ,
f ( α t + β s ) = F ( x + ( α t + β s ) ( y x ) ) = F ( α ( x + t ( y x ) ) + β ( x + s ( y x ) ) ) F ( α x + t ( y x ) + b x + s ( y x ) ) α F ( x + t ( y x ) ) + β F ( x + s ( y x ) ) = α f ( t ) + β f ( s ) .
Then, we have
Theorem 4.
Let F ( x ) is a convex and monotone increasing function on [ 0 , ) . Let X be a Banach space. We put f ( t ) = F ( ( 1 t ) x + t y ) , where x , y X . Then, for any x 1 , x 2 , , x N X and for any m , n N { 0 } , we have
F ( 1 N i = 1 N x i ) 2 N ( N 1 ) i < j 1 2 n k = 1 2 n F ( ( 1 2 k 1 2 n + 1 ) x i + 2 k 1 2 n + 1 x j ) 2 N ( N 1 ) i < j 0 1 F ( ( 1 t ) x i + t x j ) d t 2 N ( N 1 ) i < j 1 2 m + 1 { F ( x i ) + F ( x j ) + 2 k = 1 2 m 1 F ( ( 1 k 2 m ) x i + k 2 m x j ) } 1 N i = 1 N F ( x i ) .
Proof. 
By Lemma 1 and the convexity and monotonicity of F ( x ) ,
F ( 1 N i = 1 N x i ) = F ( 1 N ( N 1 ) i < j ( x i + x j ) ) = F ( 2 N ( N 1 ) i < j x i + x j 2 ) F ( 2 N ( N 1 ) i < j x i + x j 2 ) 2 N ( N 1 ) i < j F ( x i + x j 2 ) .
The inequalities, from the first to the third, are given by (3). Furthermore, the last inequality is given by Lemma 1. □
We take examples of F ( x ) .
Example 1.
(1) F ( x ) = x p , where p 1 .
(2) F ( x ) = e x .
(3) F ( x ) = cosh ( x ) = e x + e x 2 .
(4) F ( x ) = ( x + 1 ) log ( x + 1 ) .

4. Calculations of the Detailed Integral Values

We need the following two lemmas in order to prove some theorems.
Lemma 2.
Let · be the Hilbert norm on a Hilbert space H. Then, for any x , y H we have
0 1 ( 1 t ) x + t y 2 d t = 1 6 { x 2 + y 2 + x + y 2 }
Proof. 
0 1 ( 1 t ) x + t y 2 d t = 0 1 x + t ( y x ) 2 d t = x 2 + 1 2 x , y x + 1 2 y x , x + 1 3 y x 2 = x 2 + 1 2 x , y 1 2 x 2 + 1 2 y , x 1 2 x 2 + 1 3 y x 2 = 1 2 x , y + 1 2 y , x + 1 3 y x , y x = 1 2 x , y + 1 2 y , x + 1 3 ( y 2 y , x x , y + x 2 ) = 1 3 x 2 + 1 3 y 2 + 1 6 x , y + 1 6 y , x = 1 6 x 2 + 1 6 y 2 + 1 6 x + y 2 .
Lemma 3.
Let · be the Hilbert norm on a Hilbert space H. Then, for any x , y H we have
0 1 ( 1 t ) x + t y d t = 0 1 x + t ( y x ) 2 d t = 0 1 δ y x 2 t 2 + 2 ν y x t + x 2 d t = 1 2 ν y x ( y x ) + δ y x 2 y δ y x 2 + 1 2 x 2 δ y x ν y x 2 δ y x 3 log ν y x + δ y x 2 + y δ y x ν y x + x δ y x = 1 2 ( Re x , y x 2 ) ( y x ) + δ y x 2 y δ y x 2 + 1 2 x 2 δ y x ( Re x , y x 2 ) 2 δ y x 3 log y 2 R x , y + y δ y x Re x , y x 2 + x δ y x ,
where δ y x = y x and ν y x = Re x , y x .
Proof. 
Since
0 1 y x 2 t 2 + 2 Re x , y x t + x 2 d t = y x 0 1 t 2 + 2 Re x , y x y x 2 t + x 2 y x 2 d t = y x 0 1 ( t + Re x , y x y x 2 ) 2 ( Re x , y x ) 2 y x 4 + x 2 y x 2 d t ,
we may obtain the integral value of 0 1 ( t + a ) 2 + b 2 d t , where
a = Re x , y x y x 2
and
b 2 = ( Re x , y x ) 2 y x 4 + x 2 y x 2 .
Then,
0 1 ( t + a ) 2 + b 2 d t = a a + 1 s 2 + b 2 d s = 1 2 ( s s 2 + b 2 + b 2 log | s + s 2 + b 2 | ) a a + 1 = 1 2 ( a + 1 ) ( a + 1 ) 2 + b 2 + b 2 log | a + 1 + ( a + 1 ) 2 + b 2 | 1 2 a a 2 + b 2 + b 2 log | a + a 2 + b 2 | .
Since
( a + 1 ) 2 + b 2 = y y x , a 2 + b 2 = x y x ,
we obtain the result. □
Corollary 5.
Let · be the Hilbert norm on a Hilbert space H and let F ( x ) = x 2 . Then, for any x 1 , x 2 , , x N H we have
1 N i = 1 N x i 2 1 3 N i = 1 N x i 2 + 1 N 1 i < j x i + x j 2 1 N i = 1 N x i 2 .
Proof. 
It is clear from Lemma 2. □
Corollary 6.
Let · be the Hilbert norm on a Hilbert space H and let F ( x ) = x . Then, for any x 1 , x 2 , , x N H we have
i = 1 N x i 1 N 1 i < j ( μ i j x i 2 ) ( x j x i ) + δ j i 2 x j δ j i 2 + 1 N 1 i < j x i 2 δ j i ( μ i j x i 2 ) 2 δ j i 3 log x j 2 μ i j + x j δ j i μ i j x i 2 + x i δ j i i = 1 N x i ,
where δ j i = x j x i and μ i j = Re x i , x j .
Proof. 
It is clear from Lemma 3. □
Corollary 7.
Let · be the Hilbert–Schmidt norm on all of the Hilbert–Schmidt class operators and let F ( x ) = x 2 . Then for any positive Hilbert–Schmidt operators A 1 , A 2 , , A N we have
1 N i = 1 N A i 2 1 3 N i = 1 N A i 2 + 1 N 1 i < j A i A j 2 1 N i = 1 N A i 2 .
Proof. 
It is clear from Lemma 2. □
Corollary 8.
Let · be the Hilbert–Schmidt norm on all of the Hilbert–Schmidt class operators and let F ( x ) = x . Then for any positive Hilbert–Schmidt operators A 1 , A 2 , , A N we have
i = 1 N A i 1 N 1 i < j ( t i j A i 2 ) ( A j A i ) + δ j i 2 A j δ j i 2 + 1 N 1 i < j A i 2 δ j i ( t i j A i 2 ) 2 δ j i 3 log A j 2 t i j + A j δ j i t i j A i 2 + A i δ j i i = 1 N A i ,
where δ j i = A j A i and t i j = Tr [ A i A j ] .
Proof. 
It is clear from Lemma 3. □

5. Conclusions

Though the Hermite–Hadamard inequality had been given in 2-variable inequality for convex function, we obtained N-variable Hermite–Hadamard inequality in Theorem 3. Furthermore, we obtained one of norm inequalities as applications of Theorem 4 represented by an N-variable Hermite–Hadamard inequality. Lastly, we calculated several detailed integral values of norm inequalities.

Funding

The author is partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI 19K03525.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the reviewers for their important suggestions and careful reading of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cerone, P.; Dragomir, S.S. Ostrowski type inequalities for functions whose derivatives satisfying certain convexity assumptions. Demonstr. Math. 2004, 37, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Dragomir, S.S.; Agarwal, R.P. Two inequalities for differentiable mappings and applications to special means of real numbers and to trapezoidal formula. Appl. Math. Lett. 1998, 11, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Dragomir, S.S.; Cerone, P.; Sofo, A. Some remarks on the midpoint rule in numerical integration. Studia Univ. Babes-Bolyai Math. 2000, 45, 63–74. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dragomir, S.S.; Cerone, P.; Sofo, A. Some remarks on the trapezid rule in numerical integration. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 2000, 31, 475–494. [Google Scholar]
  5. Furuichi, S.; Moradi, H.R. Advances in Mathematical Inequalities; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mitroi-Symeonidis, F.C. About the precision in Jensen-Steffensen inequality. An. Univ. Craiova Ser. Mat. Inform. 2010, 37, 73–84. [Google Scholar]
  7. Moslehian, M.S. Matrix Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities. Houston J. Math. 2013, 39, 177–189. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pal, R.; Singh, M.; Moslehian, M.S.; Aujla, J.S. A new class of operator monotone functions via operator means. Linear Multilinear Algebra 2016, 64, 2463–2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Simic, S.; Bin-Mohsin, B. Some generalizations of the Hermite-Hadamard integral inequality. J. Inequal. Appl. 2021, 72, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  10. Yanagi, K. Refined Hermite-Hadamard inequality and its application. Linear Nonlinear Anal. 2021, 7, 173–184. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yanagi, K. Refined Hermite-Hadamard inequality and weighted logarithmic mean. Linear Nonlinear Anal. 2020, 6, 167–177. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yanagi, K. Refined Hermite–Hadamard Inequalities and Some Norm Inequalities. Symmetry 2022, 14, 2522. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14122522

AMA Style

Yanagi K. Refined Hermite–Hadamard Inequalities and Some Norm Inequalities. Symmetry. 2022; 14(12):2522. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14122522

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yanagi, Kenjiro. 2022. "Refined Hermite–Hadamard Inequalities and Some Norm Inequalities" Symmetry 14, no. 12: 2522. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14122522

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop