Next Article in Journal
Duncan–Chang E-υ Model Considering the Thixotropy of Clay in the Zhanjiang Formation
Previous Article in Journal
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Sustainable Agriculture
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 14
Issue 19
10.3390/su141912247
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Sustainable Logistics for E-Commerce: A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis

by
Jose Alejandro Cano
*,
Abraham Londoño-Pineda
and
Carolina Rodas
Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Universidad de Medellin, Medellin 050026, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(19), 12247; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912247
Submission received: 24 August 2022 / Revised: 14 September 2022 / Accepted: 15 September 2022 / Published: 27 September 2022
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study aims to present a bibliometric analysis and literature review and to identify publications, main topics, and trends in recent years about the sustainability of logistics operations in e-commerce environments. For this, we considered 99 documents from Scopus published in 2021 and 2022 that address logistics, e-commerce, and sustainability. The bibliometric analysis shows that authors from Italy and India stand out for generating the largest number of publications, and correspondingly, institutional affiliations from these countries present the largest scientific production. It is established that journals such as Sustainability, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, and Sustainable Cities and Society lead both in the number of published articles and the number of articles with the highest citations. Within the main topics are the sustainability of e-commerce logistics, last-mile logistics and delivery logistics, urban and city logistics, environmental impact, urban transport, packing and packaging, traffic and congestion, supply chains, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, China and cross-border e-commerce, vehicle routing, optimization methods, and decision-making techniques in operations for cost and energy efficiency. Similarly, this study identifies the main research trends related to multiple dimensions of sustainability; technological developments including electric vehicles and specialized software; crowdshipping; operation modes such as collection and delivery points, parcel lockers, and micro-depots; and policymaking.

1. Introduction

Before the COVID-19 pandemic, the world had shown an increase in the transport of goods in urban areas. During the social issolation and lockdown measures, urban mobility transport and the distribution of products presented a substantial change representing an unsustainable development of the urban environment [1,2]. Consequently, some market development dynamics have changed permanently over recent years, with online shopping becoming more popular among city dwellers [3], including the purchase of fresh food and other perishable products through e-commerce platforms [4,5,6]. It has been promoted, in part, by the increase in urbanization and the need for supplies and provisions in cities, the increase in e-commerce, and the appearance of new forms of purchase and consumption habits that increase the purchases of products online, making goods travel and be delivered in cities around the world [7,8]. E-commerce can be understood as the online purchase and sale of goods or services through the Internet [9], either business to business (B2B), consumer to consumer (C2C), or business to consumer (B2C) [10]. Compared to purchases in physical stores, e-commerce and home deliveries tend to generate positive consumer perceptions regarding environmental impact by reducing consumer transportation and reducing flows of non-sold items between warehouses and physical stores [11].
However, the constant growth of e-commerce transactions and the parcel distribution in cities increases the entry of trucks and cargo vehicles in cities, generating negative externalities related to the increase in congestion, emissions, and pollution [12,13]. One of the most representative areas of urban merchandise transport is last-mile deliveries, which consist of the activities and processes necessary for the delivery of the merchandise to consumers, taking goods from a collection point (generally a store or warehouse) to the final delivery point of the delivery chain [14,15]. Last-mile logistics significantly affect customer satisfaction and consumers’ impulse buying behavior [16,17], and have a positive impact on loyalty in e-commerce business [18], generating critical financial and environmental impacts [19] since e-commerce orders tend to be small in size, making last-mile delivery the most expensive part of the delivery process [20].
E-commerce activities can lead to environmental impacts from packaging, labels, transportation, energy consumption, and information flow that generate carbon emissions and costs [21]. Likewise, last-mile logistics in e-commerce is related to travel time and distance savings to reduce fuel consumption, waiting time, energy consumption, the use of vehicles, alternative energy sources, and CO2 emissions [21,22]. In addition to the environmental impact, e-commerce last-mile logistics impacts the economic and social dimensions of sustainability [14], which implies natural resources, the economy, and life quality improvement and preservation [23]. Therefore, e-commerce can improve the efficiency of commerce and reduce information collection costs and purchase prices for consumers [24] and offer cost savings and discounts compared to traditional channels, positively affecting sustainable consumption during pandemic periods [25].
From the social dimension, logistics in e-commerce allows the delivery of locally produced products, improving living conditions, reducing poverty levels, and offering livelihoods in different countries [23]. Likewise, e-commerce logistics directly influences congestion costs, which increase travel times, produce loss of time suffered by individuals in a society [7], generate noise, and promote accidents that affect society’s wellbeing [26]. Consequently, e-commerce requires sustainable urban logistics to provide value for multiple urban stakeholders (residents, governments, carriers, consumers, and logistics operators, among others) while being profitable for companies [15,27,28]. It requires optimizing operating costs, increasing customer satisfaction, improving service performance, and having processes that meet ecological requirements and sustainable development such as recycling and CO2 emission reduction [29,30].
Therefore, the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic has established new challenges and conditions for sustainable logistics in e-commerce, and along with this has increased the number of articles in the literature dedicated to solving logistics problems facing e-commerce retailers [31], for which it is necessary to explore trends and research opportunities emerging in the literature around this topic. Unlike previous studies focusing on innovations in freight transport and COVID-19 implications [32], the adoption of green vehicles in last-mile logistics [33], main logistics research areas related to e-commerce implementation [34], e-commerce logistics data [35], sustainability in e-commerce packaging [36], the impact of digital transformation on supply chains through e-commerce [37], and current issues and future opportunities for the last-mile logistics service industry [38], this study presents a literature review and bibliometric analysis to identify the behavior of the publications and the main themes and trends of recent years regarding the sustainability of logistics operations in e-commerce environments. Section 2 introduces the methodology used to perform the bibliometric analysis. Section 3 presents the results, and Section 4 discusses the main approaches to sustainable logistics in e-commerce. Section 5 addresses the main conclusions and future research regarding sustainable logistics in e-commerce.

2. Materials and Methods

This study is based on bibliometric analysis and a review of the literature to identify and synthesize all of the relevant studies of the existing literature related to sustainable logistics in e-commerce published in the year 2021 and 2022 (the search was performed at the beginning of June 2022). In a systematic literature review, the eligibility criteria of the documents must be specified, which must be consistent with the purpose of the research, so the document search methods must be made explicit in order to present transparent and reliable results to draw conclusions and support decision making [39]. For this reason, an international group that included experienced authors and methodologists developed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews) guideline, which consists of four phases: identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion [40]. Since the PRISMA statement recommends that authors report their search strategies for all databases, registries, or websites [41], this systematic literature review embraces such criteria, which are described below.
The identification phase sets the number of records identified through database searching and other sources. Documents were searched in the Scopus and Web of Science databases that included the concept of logistics, e-commerce, and sustainability (or similar terms) in their title, abstract, or keywords. The objective was to identify the existing literature on this topic published in the last two years, including all types of documents such as articles, reviews, conference papers, and book chapters, among others, in any language and from any country of origin. For this, a document search was performed in the Scopus database using the following search equation: TITLE-ABS-KEY (logistics AND e-commerce AND sustainab*), obtaining 253 documents from the year 2000. Then, the search equation was limited to the years 2021 and 2022, adding the following restriction to the search equation AND (LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2022) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2021)) to present a literature analysis on the sustainability of logistics operations in e-commerce environments in recent years, evidencing the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 99 documents were obtained, representing 40.7% of the initial search, as shown in Figure 1, demonstrating that the documents obtained represent a relevant contribution to the scientific output around the research topic and reflect the main research in sustainable e-commerce logistics under the COVID-19 pandemic.
Likewise, the search equation (logistics AND e-commerce AND sustainable* (Topic), Timespan: 1 January 2000 to 1 June 2022 (Publication Date)) was used in the Web of Science (WOS) database, finding 182 papers available as of 2013 from the Web of Science Core Collection. New parameters were applied to the search equation to delimit the documents published in 2021 and 2022 (Timespan: 1 January 2021 to 31 June 2022 (Publication Date)), obtaining 94 records. Figure 2 shows that of the documents published since 2013 (182 documents), 51.6% correspond to 2021 and 2022, representing more than half of the documents published in WOS in the last ten years around the research topic.
The screening phase sets the number of records after duplicates are removed, of which, when comparing the 99 Scopus documents with the 94 WOS documents, we found 85 replicated documents; WOS contributed nine documents to those found in Scopus, obtaining a base of 108 documents. The eligibility phase sets the number of full-text articles assessed for eligibility and the number of full-text articles excluded, with reasons. Consequently, the 108 documents from Scopus and WOS were applied as eligibility criteria to address issues related to logistics, urban delivery, supply chain-related topics, urban distribution, last-mile delivery, transportation, packaging, or vehicle routing. After applying these criteria, three articles that dealt with users’ sentiment toward text review, omnichannel approaches, and tourism were eliminated and moved away from the scope of this study. The inclusion phase of the PRISMA method sets the number of studies included in qualitative and quantitative synthesis, which in this case was 105 documents. Then, these documents received an analysis based on leading authors, institutional affiliation, documents by country/territory, subject areas, leading journals, most-cited documents, main research topics addressed, and the co-occurrence of concepts.
The analysis of authors, institutional affiliation, and countries/territories indicates the geographic location and institutions concentrating on the scientific production of the research topic. The subject areas establish the approach received by the publications on sustainable e-commerce logistics and clarify how this topic is addressed in the literature. The journals and authors with the greatest number of published documents make it possible to point out the recommended sources for the publication of works and the documents with the most impact. The main topics and research concepts are identified through the keywords of the collected documents, and the co-occurrence of these concepts is established through clusters generated with the VOSviewer software, identifying research nodes in each cluster through the size of its corresponding spheres.

3. Results

The results of the bibliometric analysis indicate that the authors with the greatest contributions to the sustainability of logistics operations in e-commerce are Buldeo Rai (France/Belgium), Prajapati (Jabalpur, India), Pratap (Varanasi, India), Chelladurai (Jabalpur, India), Mangiaracina (Milan, Italy), Seghezzi (Milan, Italy), Tumino (Milan, Italy), and Macharis (Brussels, Belgium), each providing three or more documents in the last two years, as shown in Table A1.
Of the authors involved in this field, it is identified that Buldeo Rai, Verlinde, and Macharis are co-authors, reflecting cooperation between European institutions such as Université Gustave Eiffel and Vrije University Brussel [19,35,42,43]. Prajapati and Pratap are co-authors with Chan and Chelladurai [44,45,46,47], demonstrating collaborative work among Asian institutions such as IIITDM Jabalpur, the Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), and Macau University of Science and Technology. Mangiaracina works in co-authorship with Seghezzi [20,48,49], Tumino [20,49], and Siragusa [49], and in turn, Siragusa and Tumino are co-authors [50], thus demonstrating research dynamics within the Politecnico di Milano. Collaborative work is also identified between Gatta and Marcucci [33,51], affiliated to the Università degli Studi Roma Tre. In Austria, Brandtner, Herman, Pfoser, and Schauer are co-authors at the University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria [52,53]. Settey and Gnap, from the University of Žilina in Slovakia, co-author two studies [1,54], and Villa and Monzón are co-authors in Spain affiliated with the Polytechnic University of Madrid and the Camilo José Cela University [7,55]. In Asia, Dang, Nguyen, and Wang work together [56,57], generating relationships between VNUHCM and the National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology.
Table 1 corroborates this information and shows the main institutional affiliations and the institutions producing the most scientific output on the research topic. In this sense, Politecnico di Milano (Milan, Italy) heads the list, participating in 5.7% of the publications [20,48,49,50,58,59], in which the majority of leading authors such as Mangiaracina, Seghezzi, Tumino, and Siragusa participate. In second place is the IIITDM Jabalpur (Jabalpur, India) and the Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), contributing four documents [44,45,46,47], where leading authors such as Prajapati, Chan, Chelladurai, and Pratap participate. Likewise, among the institutions that provide three documents are the Università degli Studi di Padova (Padua, Italy) [34,60,61], and Vrije Universiteit Brussel (Belgium) [19,42,43]. In this way, the significant contribution by universities in Italy and India in the field of research is remarkable.
Likewise, Table 2 corroborates this information, showing that Italy ranks second, participating in 12.4% of documents, while China leads with institutions from that country in 31.4% of published documents. Therefore, China presents the largest number of document production; however, said production is not concentrated in a few institutions or authors because the institutions of that country that contribute the most documents are Shanxi University and Tongji University, each with two documents, respectively. Likewise, China leads the scientific output due to the rapid expansion of the express delivery industry in that country and the environmental pollution problem triggered by the express packaging wastes that severely impact human health and sustainable social development [62].
Moreover, Table 3 shows that the dominant subject area of sustainable e-commerce logistics is social sciences due to the sustainability approach and its social dimension. Environmental sciences and energy are related to the environmental dimension of sustainability, while the business, administration, and accounting area oversees the economic dimension and e-commerce business models. Areas such as engineering support the technical, operational, and logistical components of e-commerce. Areas such as computer science, decision making, and mathematics address optimization models to improve the three sustainability dimensions.
Regarding publication sources, the leading journal in the number of published documents is Sustainability (MDPI), contributing 24.8% of the published articles on the research topic, followed by the International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, which contributes 4.8% of the articles. It is noteworthy that of the nine leading journals that have contributed two or more documents in the last two years, three correspond to conferences and proceedings containing documents related to preliminary findings and the rapid dissemination of research results. This research can probably be published in a complete and refined version in journals that also make up the ranking in Table 4. In fact, of the 105 documents obtained in this analysis, 72.4% of the documents correspond to articles, 20.0% to conference papers, 5.7% to literature reviews, and 1.9% to book chapters.
It should be noted from Table A2 that four of the most-cited articles belong to the journal Sustainability (MDPI), while three of these articles belong to the journal Sustainable Cities and Society (Elsevier). Similarly, the International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications (Taylor and Francis) provides two of the most-cited articles on the research topic. Likewise, these journals stand out for the impact of the articles published by obtaining significant citations. Table A2 also shows that nine articles belong to journals of the publisher MDPI, while nine articles belong to journals published by Elsevier. On the other hand, it is identified that authors such as Mangiaracina and Seghezzi are co-authors of two of the most-cited articles in the last two years [20,48]. Likewise, Villa and Monzón [7,55], Wang, Dang, and Nguyen [56,57], and Buldeo Rai and Macharis [19,43] are co-authors of two of the most-cited articles. Most of the articles in Table A2 are open access, except for [8,15,19,63,64]; thus, it is relevant to consider open access journals and publication sources that increase the visibility and impact of publications on the research topic. It is also highlighted that three of the most-cited documents are literature reviews [15,33,36], which usually receive a high number of citations by becoming seminal articles that compile the main contributions of publications around a research topic.
From the main topics addressed in the articles considered in the literature review, e-commerce, sustainability, sustainable development, and logistics stand out as they represent the central topic and the concepts used in the search equation. Figure 3 shows that the topics of last-mile logistics and delivery logistics stand out, being addressed in 26 documents (24.8%), as well as urban and city logistics that are addressed in 21 documents (20.0%). In this sense, much of the discussion on sustainable e-commerce logistics focuses on urban contexts and addresses the challenges related to environmental impact (pollution control, recycling, circular economy, green logistics, reverse logistics), urban transport, packaging, traffic, and congestion.
Other relevant issues are related to supply chains and supply chain management, and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic that increased the use of e-commerce and generated significant changes in consumer behavior. Likewise, topics such as China and cross-border e-commerce are booming, as China represents the country with the largest participation in e-commerce worldwide and plays a significant role in the world economy regarding the manufacture of products and movement of goods [65,66,67,68]. Cross-border e-commerce also highlights the need to move products abroad using international logistics [69,70,71,72], and it requires traceability systems to help overcome information uncertainty and asymmetry among supply chain stakeholders from the supply side to end-customers to prevent counterfeit goods [73]. From a technical point of view, vehicle routing issues stand out, supported by multi-objective optimization [74,75], and planning and decision-making techniques to increase cost and energy efficiency [76,77,78], and minimize the total time associated with order processing [47] (economic dimension). Likewise, additional concepts related to freight transport solutions, such as electronic vehicles and drones and distribution solutions such as crowdsourcing and parcel lockers, are relevant in the literature. For the social dimension, topics related to accident prevention, reduction of traffic congestion, circular economy, and improvement of the delivery service are identified in the documents analyzed.
The association of these concepts is illustrated in Figure 4, which details the co-occurrence analysis of concepts and keywords through four clusters focused on e-commerce, sustainability, sustainable development, and supply chain. The findings of co-occurrence analysis enabled the identification of the core concepts focusing on sustainable e-commerce logistics between 2021 and 2022. For this, the input database was previously prepared by gathering the keywords from the Scopus and WOS documents and unifying similar concepts such as “last-mile delivery” and “last mile delivery” (last-mile delivery); “electronic commerce”, “e-commerce”, “and e-commerces” (e-commerce); and “supply chain” and “supply chains” (supply chain). Then, keywords such as “literature review”, “survey”, and “China” were excluded, which are recurrent in the analyzed documents, but do not represent structural concepts of e-commerce, sustainability, and logistics. Consequently, the VOSviewer software was configured with the following parameters: type of analysis—co-occurrence; counting method—full counting; unit of analysis—all keywords. Of the 105 documents analyzed, 818 keywords were obtained, of which 21 met the established threshold (minimum number of occurrences of a keyword: 5). Thus, using the data on the total link strength and occurrence between keywords (Table 5), four clusters of scientific areas and themes were identified. The clusters were named considering the core keyword with the highest total link strength and occurrence.
The first biggest cluster (red) was called e-commerce and involved the keywords with the highest level of links. The links characterize the numbers of keywords used with the analyzed words. Thus, Figure 5a shows that the keyword “e-commerce” is associated in the analyzed documents with concepts such as logistics, COVID-19, supply chain management, consumption behavior, innovation, and reverse logistics, highlighting the context in which logistics develops, directly affected by the post-pandemic effects on supply chain management, innovation challenges, reverse logistics efforts to reduce externalities, and the change in preferences of consumer purchasing modes.
The second cluster (green) shown in Figure 5b focuses on the sustainability concept, associating with concepts such as city logistics, last-mile delivery, traffic congestion, and urban logistics, which are directly associated with economic, social, and environmental dimensions of sustainability. The third cluster (blue) presented in Figure 5c has the sustainable development concept as its central node and is directly related to environmental impact, urban transportation, packaging, and planning, which are related to the impacts of logistics planning and operations. The fourth cluster (yellow) shown in Figure 5d corresponds to the concept of supply chain, meeting the concept of last mile, vehicle routing, and sales, which represent the main supply chain processes addressed in e-commerce.
Sustainability 14 12247 g004 550
Figure 4. Co-occurrence analysis of concepts and keywords.
Figure 4. Co-occurrence analysis of concepts and keywords.
Sustainability 14 12247 g004
Sustainability 14 12247 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Cluster 1—red; (b) cluster 2—green; (c) cluster 3—blue; (d) cluster 4—yellow.
Figure 5. (a) Cluster 1—red; (b) cluster 2—green; (c) cluster 3—blue; (d) cluster 4—yellow.
Sustainability 14 12247 g005
Table
Table 5. Findings of the co-occurrence analysis.
Table 5. Findings of the co-occurrence analysis.
Items of keywords—21Total links strength—774
Number of clusters—7
ClusterKeywords of the ClustersTotal Links StrengthOccurrences
Cluster 1E-commerce16170
Logistics7727
COVID-193010
Supply chain management236
Consumption behavior175
Innovation135
Reverse logistics105
Cluster 2Sustainability9730
City logistics4714
Last-mile delivery4212
Traffic congestion185
Urban logistics126
Cluster 3Sustainable development8027
Environmental impact155
Urban transportation145
Packaging135
Planning116
Cluster 4Supply chain3112
Last mile337
Vehicle routing176
Sales135

4. Main Approaches to Sustainable Logistics in E-Commerce

The analysis of the documents obtained in the literature review established several approaches in which the discussion around the sustainability of e-commerce logistics is focused, highlighting the dimensions of sustainability, technological developments, crowdshipping, operation modes, and government policymaking.

4.1. Dimensions of Sustainability

It is increasingly necessary to address e-commerce logistics from the environmental, economic, and social dimensions of sustainability to guarantee the sustainability of a logistics network in the long term [79], and balancing economic, social, and environmental benefits related to resources, energy, and the environment [80]. It can even consider a technological dimension related to innovative products, services, and processes such as automatic parcel lockers, drones, and autonomous vehicles [22], and collaborative innovation in delivery platforms to contribute to the enhancement of consumers’ wellbeing and boost economic growth [81]. In this sense, the methodologies to prioritize dimensions of sustainability are valuable to establish their importance according to a given context, considering the trade-offs for sustainability dimensions [82]. In some circumstances, the environmental dimension is the most important, followed by the social and economic dimension [22], while in other cases, the economic dimension is the best ranked [57]. Moreover, in the literature, few studies have simultaneously addressed the dimensions of sustainability.
The criteria addressed in the economic dimension are mainly related to financial stability and growth, financial benefits, and commercial opportunities for electronic businesses. The social dimension is usually evaluated through customer satisfaction [74], the improvement of the community environment, value generation to stakeholders [65], the constant growth of the territories, and dynamic areas in cities supported by smart loading zones [83,84]. Likewise, the environmental dimension corresponds to the preservation of natural resources, the improvement of the CO2 footprint in urban areas [85], the reduction of the pollution footprint through efficient last-mile delivery routes [63,86], and the strategies to encourage consumers to buy online by bundling products into orders for fewer deliveries and selecting less packaging waste options [87,88].

4.2. Technological Developments

Technologies represent one of the principal means to reduce the negative externalities on the environment and guarantee sustainable urban transport. These technologies include communication platforms, vehicle tracking systems, and route-planning support tools [30], and new developments should lead to achieving the maximum end-to-end integration of digital platforms [65]. Since a shift towards more eco-sustainable alternative fuels and the optimization of the distances traveled by light goods vehicles appears necessary, electric vehicles represent another type of technology for the substitution of traditional diesel- and petrol-driven vehicles [59,89], producing zero tailpipe emissions [90], and compared to diesel vehicles can provide emissions savings of up to 30%, a significant reduction in noise, and future improvements in these technologies are expected to contribute even more to its sustainability [8]. Other challenges of electric vehicles are related to the fleet sizes, schedule, and the required structural and infrastructural changes to support the efficient running of their operations [90].
Likewise, this requires the promotion systems to collect and disseminate information on urban freight transport and electric mobility so that logistics operators and government authorities understand the implications of technological developments in sustainable logistics [8]. As logistics service providers have had a positive effect on satisfaction in e-commerce logistics [56,57,91], they now need to accelerate the decarbonization of last-mile delivery, while e-commerce retailers need to further develop the relationship with logistics service providers, and suppliers of hardware such as cargo bikes, stationary and mobile parcel lockers, and drones need to improve the convenience for logistics service providers with their products [92].
Moreover, the inclusion of crowdshipping logistics models and technologies such as autonomous vehicles (AGV) and drones, among others, improve the last-mile operation and accelerate the benefits of sustainable urban freight transport [93]. However, it requires the development of technological platforms to control the urban freight and passenger transport system effectively and globally [33]. In this sense, there are research opportunities in vehicle routing, vehicle routing problems with drones [94], scheduling, telematics systems to reduce CO2 emissions and fuel consumption [95], data collection standardization, and data collection methodologies and sources to promote mobility in cities [35].

4.3. Crowdshipping

Crowdshipping or crowdsourcing logistics represents a social collaboration strategy that delegates delivery to third parties who act as last-mile couriers, thus reducing the number of delivery trucks in urban/suburban areas, lowering delivery costs, and maintaining the service level [9]. In crowdshipping, deliveries are assigned to a network of ordinary people through an open call [20], where the capacity available in various modes of transport is expected to be used to make deliveries [96]. Although it encourages using cleaner transport modes such as walking, cycling, or public transport, the mode most used by couriers remains passenger vehicles and trucks. Crowdshipping platforms offer a variety of trading systems, including exclusive/private platforms, on-demand delivery platforms, community-based platforms, ship and shopping platforms, and first/last-mile delivery to/from local carriers [9].
Crowdshipping business models for last-mile deliveries in the e-commerce market represent a relevant trend in scientific research [15], facing challenges related to minimizing total transportation costs, enhancing the formality of work for independent contractors or platform employees, guaranteeing the service level, and reducing the negative externalities of emissions and traffic congestion. Likewise, other research opportunities include the analysis of parking availability, optimization of existing trips, efficient schedule of deliveries, analysis of infrastructure and information systems, and pricing and payment strategies [9,97]. Therefore, crowdshipping could reduce fixed costs and empty vehicle space, generating a more sustainable, environmentally friendly, and economically efficient community [9,15].

4.4. Operation Modes

Collection and delivery centers represent one of the operation modes that improve the sustainability of e-commerce logistics and emerge as a solution to failed home deliveries, facilitating the consolidation of merchandise in optimized trips. This operation mode reduces the number of trips and vehicles to be used by logistics operators (economic dimension), reducing logistics flows to citizens (social and environmental dimension) [22]. These centers are conceived as a network of facilities located in accessible places, close enough to avoid using motorized transport for the customer collection trip, where carriers deliver orders and e-consumers pick up online purchases as an alternative to home delivery [98,99]. However, important factors for the success of this operation mode include horizontal collaboration, building strong network partnerships with customers, and distribution channel actors [100]. Therefore, the viability of these operation modes depends on local parameters such as regulations, droplet densities, and collection point networks, for which the results of previous studies cannot be generalized or transferred to other contexts [43].
Similarly, other operation modes such as micro-depots and parcel lockers represent logistics facilities located within or near an urban area, where a logistics operator can load or unload, sort, store, and deliver parcels from it to the final recipient. Its purpose is to facilitate the consolidation of deliveries and reduce the environmental impact by using last-mile vehicles such as cargo bikes, electric vehicles, drones, and autonomous vehicles, highlighting that, in some cases, citizens prefer the use of drone or bike distribution in city centers to reduce social and environmental issues [101]. However, the choice of consumers to collect packages from lockers depends on the available infrastructure and the time needed to reach the collection point and requires ensuring accessibility on foot and by bicycle [102].
The most common micro depots usually belong to a single company, but they can operate in a shared mode, where they are used by multiple logistics operators, guaranteeing their financial viability [79]. These operation modes will be accepted by companies as they do not represent additional costs and demonstrate better results when comparing door-to-door deliveries [13,103], and as they promote quick commerce (Q-commerce) to accelerate logistics and provide customers with small quantities of products almost instantly, both for B2C deliveries and B2B order fulfillment [104,105,106]. Likewise, business models based on dark stores allow the gross price to be lower than the physical store due to low operating costs and market entry costs [51]. Therefore, the establishment of urban logistics centers, from their design, must conceive the reduction of kilometers traveled to make deliveries [1] and consider in future research opportunities the inclusion of variables such as the size of the order, the transportation mode, the duration and frequency of trips, the mapping of consumer preferences, the dynamics of pricing policies, and the integration of urban express delivery service models [14,107,108].

4.5. Government Policymaking

The change in the planning and operation of e-commerce logistics in a sustainable way must be supported by government policies, regulations, restrictions, regional and national integrations, investments in infrastructure, and the application of strategies that satisfy the stakeholders and allow them to grow in the long term while maintaining harmony between the economic, social, and environmental aspects [15,30]. Local governments and companies operating in cities must focus last-mile solutions on easily accessible collection points, discouraging home deliveries, while in non-urban zones, it is preferable to encourage home delivery through well-established logistics operators. Likewise, it seeks to support more sustainable last-mile initiatives that reduce operating costs through sustainable transportation modes, such as electric vehicles or cargo bicycles [43]. Likewise, the reduction of environmental impacts can be achieved by encouraging the use of innovative technologies and initiatives such as the IoT (Internet of Things), big data, route optimization algorithms, parcel lockers, the collaboration between couriers and logistics providers [109], blockchain technology to create efficient and transparent intelligent logistics [110], algorithms and mathematical models for the location of city hubs [111], location of urban logistics facilities [1,112], location of parcel lockers [113], and relocation of retail stores for changing the spatial structure to promote the conceptualization of a smart city [64]. Other initiatives to encourage are related to the use of consolidation centers and urban distribution in flexible hours, regulations for loading and unloading parking zones [89], promoting territorial plans for the development of underground logistics systems [55,86], limits to the access of cargo vehicles to urban areas, the definition of specific hours for logistics operations, and economic incentives for individuals as a way to promote modernization of urban vehicle fleets, among others [7,22,106].
When the benefits of cooperation are greater, cooperation will occur, promoting win–win cooperation [114,115], so it is important to promote the coordination between the government, local authorities, logistics operators, transportation business, educational institutions, and private actors because conflicts with local authorities are a determining factor in the failure of projects, especially when logistics operators are the ones directly affected by them [22,106,116]. For example, between the government, local authorities, and logistics operators, a system of rewards could be adopted for companies that share information on the environmental and social sustainability of their deliveries, thus encouraging more companies to be transparent with customers so that they make informed decisions [117].
Consequently, the design of government policies around e-commerce logistics can encompass the dimensions of sustainability by raising consumers’ awareness of ecofriendly delivery [115], promoting working conditions that guarantee fair wages and job stability and protect the physical and mental health of the actors (social dimension). Likewise, these policies should encourage environmentally friendly vehicles such as bicycles, electric vehicles, drones, and public transport to mobilize packages, as well as laws and regulations related to the e-commerce logistics packaging (paper and plastic products), the reuse and recycling of waste delivered to the consumer, and reverse logistics providers [57,62,118,119,120,121] (environmental dimension). Finally, policies and public projects should guarantee the required infrastructure to offer efficient logistics systems [92], allow the operation of package collection points in strategic and safe places, and promote economic benefits via subsidies and tax deductions (economic dimension).

5. Conclusions

E-commerce logistics has become a significant element for the sustainability of business models based on online sales due to the economic, environmental, and social impact related to the mobilization of merchandise and parcels in urban areas. This study identified the growth of publications on sustainable e-commerce logistics in recent years, highlighting the importance of this topic in the scientific and business community. The bibliometric analysis established that the authors with the highest number of publications, and correspondingly, the institutional affiliations with the most scientific output, belong to Italy and India. The results of this study suggest considering the submission of future documents on the research topic to the journals Sustainability, the International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, and Sustainable Cities and Society, since they lead both in the number of articles published and in the number of articles with the highest citations.
Likewise, this study identifies the main management topics around sustainable e-commerce logistics, highlighting last-mile logistics and delivery logistics, urban and city logistics, environmental impact, urban transport, packaging, traffic and congestion, supply chains, China and cross-border e-commerce, and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. From a technical point of view, the main topics are related to vehicle routing supported by multi-objective optimization, optimization methods, and planning and decision-making techniques to increase cost and energy efficiency. Similarly, the literature review showed research trends around freight transport solutions related to electronic vehicles and drones and delivery solutions such as crowdshipping and collection and delivery centers.
From the literature review, it is established that sustainable e-commerce logistics is approached from the economic (stability, growth and financial benefit, commercial opportunities), social (environment improvements of the community, growth of territories), and environmental dimension (conservation of natural resources and improvement of the CO2 footprint in urban areas). Likewise, the analyzed documents indicate research trends around considering multiple dimensions of sustainability and their prioritization, technological developments for transportation modes and electronic platforms, the delegation of deliveries to third parties (crowdshipping), operation modes through collection and delivery centers, parcel lockers, and micro-depots as a solution to cargo consolidation, fast home deliveries, reduction of polluting gases, and cost reduction. Likewise, government policy requirements must encourage the use of bicycles, electric vehicles, drones, and public transport and boost the creation of collection and delivery points. Moreover, policymakers should guarantee the good condition of the roads, adjust logistics operation schedules, and promote economic benefits through subsidies and tax deductions.
Unlike previous research, this study presents a literature review and bibliometric analysis on the sustainability of logistics operations in e-commerce environments analyzing the approaches to address the economic, social, and environmental dimensions through technological developments, social collaboration strategies, modes of operation, and government policies. Thus, this study does not focus solely on freight transport, green vehicles, logistics data, sustainable packaging, green deliveries on e-commerce, and environmental sustainability for the last-mile logistics services industry, as recent last-mile logistics and e-commerce literature reviews have done.
There are some limitations that should be considered for future research. Future studies can employ other relational methods such as co-citation analysis and co-authorship analysis and employ other common software programs for relational methods such as Gephi, CiteSpace, Tree of Science, and HistCite™. Although our dataset from Scopus and Web of Science is comprehensive, it is not exhaustive, since our analysis did not include all journals and conference proceedings available worldwide that can be found in other databases and sources such as ScienceDirect, Scielo, Proquest, Jstor, Ebsco, and Google Scholar. In addition, future research can focus on other publications different from peer-reviewed articles, such as research notes, gray literature, blueprints, and technical reports to present a clearer overview of the main trends, directions, and performance of sustainable e-commerce logistics. Likewise, future work may focus on studying the perceptions and requirements of logistics operators and other stakeholders to identify the main difficulties and barriers to contributing to sustainable e-commerce logistics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.A.C. and C.R.; methodology, J.A.C. and A.L.-P.; software, J.A.C.; validation, J.A.C., A.L.-P. and C.R.; formal analysis, J.A.C.; investigation, J.A.C., A.L.-P. and C.R.; resources, J.A.C. and A.L.-P.; data curation, J.A.C.; writing—original draft preparation, J.A.C. and C.R.; writing—review and editing, J.A.C. and A.L.-P.; visualization, J.A.C.; supervision, A.L.-P.; project administration, J.A.C. and A.L.-P.; funding acquisition, J.A.C. and A.L.-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table
Table A1. Leading authors.
Table A1. Leading authors.
AuthorDocsSubject Area *AffiliationCountry/Territory
Buldeo Rai, H.[19,35,42,43]Consumer behavior; delivery; e-commerce; experiment; sustainability; consumer preferences; crowdsourcing; last-mile delivery; omnichannel retail; sharing economy; e-commerce data; urban logistics; urban freight transport; city logistics; collecting points; urban-rural differentiationUniversité Gustave Eiffel
Vrije Universiteit Brussel		Marne-la-Vallee, France
Brussels, Belgium
Prajapati, D.[44,45,46,47]Carbon emission; cost analysis; e-commerce; supply chain management; sustainability; agro foods and food supply; vehicle routing; metaheuristics; public policy; sustainable development; logistic services; supplier selection; transportation problem; B2B e-commerce; optimizationIndian Institute of Information Technology, Design & Manufacturing Jabalpur—IIITDM JabalpurJabalpur, India
Pratap, S.[44,45,46,47]Carbon emission; cost analysis; e-commerce; supply chain management; sustainability; agro foods and food supply; vehicle routing; metaheuristics; public policy; sustainable development; logistic services; supplier selection; transportation problem; B2B e-commerce; optimizationIndian Institute of Technology Banaras Hindu University—Indian Institute of Technology (BHU)Varanasi, India
Chelladurai, H.[44,46,47]Carbon emission; cost analysis; e-commerce; supply chain management; sustainability; logistic services; supplier selection; transportation problem; B2B e-commerce; optimization; metaheuristics; vehicle routingIndian Institute of Information Technology, Design and Manufacturing Jabalpur—IIITDM JabalpurJabalpur, India
Mangiaracina, R.[20,48,49]B2C e-commerce; crowdsourcing logistics; last-mile delivery; pony express; urban logistics; on-demand food delivery; labor demandPolitecnico di MilanoMilan, Italy
Seghezzi, A.[20,48,49]B2C e-commerce; crowdsourcing logistics; last-mile delivery; pony express; urban logistics; on-demand food delivery; labor demandPolitecnico di MilanoMilan, Italy
Tumino, A.[20,49,50]B2C e-commerce; crowdsourcing logistics; last-mile delivery; pony express; urban logistics; e-grocery; environmental impact; sustainability; e-grocery; environmental impact; labor demandPolitecnico di MilanoMilan, Italy
Macharis, C.[19,42,43]Consumer behavior; delivery; e-commerce; experiment; sustainability; consumer preferences; crowdsourcing; last-mile delivery; omnichannel retail; sharing economy; collecting points; urban-rural differentiationVrije Universiteit BrusselBrussels, Belgium
Brandtner, P.[52,53]Circular economy; e-commerce; fashion industry;
PESTEL analysis; packaging; logistics; sustainability; transport		University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, School of ManagementSteyr, Austria
Chan, F.T.S.[44,45]Carbon emission; cost analysis; e-commerce; supply chain management; sustainability; agro foods and food supply; vehicle routing; metaheuristic; public policy; sustainable developmentMacau University of Science and TechnologyTaipa, Macau
Dang, T.T.[56,57]Decision making; e-commerce; FAHP; FTOPSIS; recycling; reverse logistics; sustainability; 3PL; FVIKOR; logistics outsourcingInternational University, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City—VNUHCMHo Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
Gatta, V.[33,51]Autonomous vehicles; drones; e-commerce; green logistics; green vehicles; last-mile logistics; urban freight; city logistics; consumer behavior; discrete choice modeling; e-grocery; urban freight transportUniversità degli Studi Roma TreRome, Italy
Gnap, J.[1,54]Distribution; electric vehicle; logistics centre; sustainable city logistics; urban driving cycleUniversity of ŽilinaZilina, Slovakia
Herman, K.[52,53]Circular economy; e-commerce; fashion industry;
PESTEL analysis; packaging; logistics; sustainability; transport		University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, School of ManagementSteyr, Austria
Marcucci, E.[33,51]Autonomous vehicles; drones; e-commerce; green logistics; green vehicles; last-mile logistics; urban freight; city logistics; consumer behavior; discrete choice modeling; e-grocery; urban freight transportUniversità degli Studi Roma TreRome, Italy
Monzón, A.[7,55]City logistics; e-commerce; last-mile innovation; sustainable development; urban rail freight; environmental economics; sustainable transportUniversidad Politécnica de MadridMadrid, Spain
Nguyen, N.A.T.[56,57]Decision making; e-commerce; FAHP; FTOPSIS; recycling; reverse logistics; sustainability; 3PL; FVIKOR; logistics outsourcingNational Kaohsiung University of Science and TechnologyKaohsiung, Taiwan
Pfoser, S.[52,53]Circular economy; e-commerce; fashion industry;
PESTEL analysis; packaging; logistics; sustainability; transport		University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, School of EngineeringWels, Austria
Schauer, O.[52,53]Circular economy; e-commerce; fashion industry;
PESTEL analysis; packaging; logistics; sustainability; transport		University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, School of ManagementSteyr, Austria
Settey, T.[1,54]Distribution; electric vehicle; logistics centre; sustainable city logistics; urban driving cycleUniversity of ŽilinaZilina, Slovakia
Siragusa, C.[49,50]E-grocery; environmental impact; sustainability; last- mile delivery; e-commerce; logistics; labor demandPolitecnico di MilanoMilan, Italy
Verlinde, S.[19,42]Consumer behavior; delivery; e-commerce; experiment; sustainability; consumer preferences; crowdsourcing; last-mile delivery; omnichannel retail; sharing economyVrije Universiteit BrusselBrussels, Belgium
Villa, R.[7,55]City logistics; e-commerce; last-mile innovation; sustainable development; urban rail freight; environmental economics; sustainable transportUniversidad Camilo José CelaMadrid, Spain
Wang, C.N.[56,57]Decision making; e-commerce; FAHP; FTOPSIS; recycling; reverse logistics; sustainability; 3PL; FVIKOR; logistics outsourcingNational Kaohsiung University of Science and TechnologyKaohsiung, Taiwan
* Based on article keywords.
Table
Table A2. Most cited documents in sustainable e-commerce logistics.
Table A2. Most cited documents in sustainable e-commerce logistics.
DocumentCitesOA *SourceTopic
Sustainability in e-commerce packaging: A review [36]39YesJournal of Cleaner Production (Elsevier)The authors review the evolution of packaging in the last century through a literature review on packaging in e-commerce, emphasizing the environmental aspect. The results show that since the 1990s, it has become difficult to reduce the costs and environmental impacts of packaging because some packaging products are made from non-renewable materials. Among the recommendations, the need to investigate new packaging derived from renewable sources, such as carton board, is highlighted. Another alternative may be the improvement of distribution processes to take better advantage of available packaging, as well as the use of additive manufacturing to optimize packaging volumes and shapes.
A compromised decision-making approach to third-party logistics selection in sustainable supply chain using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy VIKOR methods [56]29YesMathematics (MDPI)The authors propose a model to support decision making in the evaluation and selection of logistics operators (3PL) based on a multicriteria method such as the fuzzy AHP to weigh criteria and the fuzzy VIKOR method to prioritize alternatives. The model includes criteria such as reliability and delivery time, logistics cost, network management, service quality, and customer’s voice. The use of linguistic variables makes it possible to mitigate the uncertainty in the weighting of criteria, and the model determines the logistics operator that best meets the criteria of sustainable development.
Outsourcing reverse logistics for e-commerce retailers: A two-stage fuzzy optimization approach [57]22YesAxioms (MDPI)This study develops a method for the selection and evaluation of reverse logistics operators. The authors use the fuzzy AHP method to establish the importance weight of the criteria and use the fuzzy TOPSIS method to prioritize the alternatives. The proposed method is applied in a case in Vietnam, highlighting that the most important criteria for selecting reverse logistics operators are response time, customer’s voice, cost, quality of service, and delivery.
The adoption of green vehicles in last mile logistics: A systematic review [33]22YesSustainability (MDPI)The authors present a literature review on the adoption of green vehicles for urban freight transport, with special emphasis on e-commerce. The study analyzes 159 documents that revolve around optimization and scheduling, policies, sustainability, and e-commerce. The findings indicate that green vehicles are competitive for urban deliveries characterized by frequent stop-and-go movements and low consolidation levels. The need for incentives to motivate the adoption of green vehicles is highlighted, and the use of autonomous vehicles is viewed as a promising and challenging issue.
‘Pony express’ crowdsourcing logistics for last-mile delivery in B2C e-commerce: an economic analysis [20]20YesInternational Journal of Logistics Research and Applications (Taylor and Francis)The authors investigate the economic profitability of an express courier crowdsourcing logistics initiative in an urban area. The study presents a model to estimate delivery costs using crowdsourced services and compares them to the cost of traditional express courier services.
Mobility restrictions and e-commerce: Holistic balance in Madrid centre during COVID-19 lockdown [7] 18YesEconomies (MDPI)The authors intend to measure and compare the traffic of Madrid Central in the periods before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, to quantify the e-commerce orders generated by residents and the light cargo vehicles required to deliver the packages of said orders, measuring their environmental impact. The results show that after the pandemic, the number of packages delivered doubled, increasing the number of light cargo vehicles and contamination. The challenge of combining new forms of mobility in large cities to meet the large volumes of e-commerce deliveries demanded by residents is highlighted.
Who is interested in a crowdsourced last mile? A segmentation of attitudinal profiles [19]16NoTravel Behaviour and Society (Elsevier)The authors identify the type of consumers interested in a collaborative last-mile process and the collaborative logistics services that they consider interesting. The study conducts a survey with a thousand consumers representing the population of Belgium. The results recommend that retailers should focus on a crowdsourcing solution that combines the collection and delivery of products between the local network of their employees, to target consumers and accentuate the quality of collaborative logistics to improve information transparency.
Sustainable last mile delivery on e-commerce market in cities from the perspective of various stakeholders. Literature review [15]13NoSustainable Cities and Society (Elsevier)This study focuses on identifying, through a literature review, trends in sustainable last-mile delivery in e-commerce, from the point of view of various stakeholders. It is highlighted that recent articles address new technological and organizational solutions such as IoT, autonomous vehicles, crowdshipping, parcel lockers, and e-commerce customer behavior analysis.
On-demand food delivery: Investigating the economic performances [48]10YesInternational Journal of Retail and Distribution Management (Emerald)The authors address economic performance about fresh food deliveries at home supported by online platforms, where multiple actors such as customers, riders, and platforms influence. They develop a cost model, apply it to a case in Milan, Italy, and apply a sensitivity analysis. They identify details about prices, demand levels, and types of wages that affect the system.
Challenges and perspectives for the use of electric vehicles for last mile logistics of grocery e-commerce—Findings from case studies in Germany [8]9NoResearch in Transportation Economics (Elsevier)The authors address potential changes in shopping habits in online convenience stores in Germany, mapping prospects, prerequisites, and challenges for implementing electric vehicles by logistics operators for product distribution and generating related industry and policy recommendations.
New paradigm of logistics space reorganization: E-commerce, land use, and supply chain management [122]9YesTransportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives (Elsevier)The authors analyze the use of land to meet the demand for retail e-commerce (e-tailing) in China, establishing that e-tailing has determined the way in which logistics facilities are designed, improved, relocated, and used to adjust to the requirements of the supply chain. The renovation of obsolete facilities, the reorganization of existing facilities, and the development of new multi-story facilities are highlighted as the main types of land use to reduce the gap between demand and supply of logistics space.
Last-mile delivering: Analysis of environment-friendly transport [63]6NoSustainable Cities and Society (Elsevier)The authors present a methodology that conceives internal and external costs to select the most sustainable mode of delivery in urban areas, focusing on package delivery that can also be delivered on foot or by bicycle.
The growth of e-commerce due to COVID-19 and the need for urban logistics centers using electric vehicles: Bratislava case study [1]6YesSustainability (MDPI)The authors present a methodology for the location of urban logistics centers that considers the approved territorial plan and uses mathematical programming methods to decide the appropriate location of logistics centers, optimizes the problem of vehicle routing and length of routes to consider the possibility of fast charging of electric and hybrid vehicles.
A metro-based system as sustainable alternative for urban logistics in the era of e-commerce [55]6YesSustainability (MDPI)The authors study the potential of a metro system in Madrid to offer delivery services taking advantage of the existing load capacity and using the metro stations to collect packages at ticket offices. The cost and impacts of the two scenarios (shared trains and dedicated trains) are evaluated, and the costs are compared with those of the current e-commerce delivery scenario, which is package delivery by road. The results show that underground parcel transport could significantly reduce the costs of congestion, accidents, noise, emissions, and air pollution.
E-groceries: A channel choice analysis in Shanghai [51] 5YesSustainability (MDPI)This article presents the results of a survey in Shanghai (China) of consumer channel choice preferences for the grocery store market. Different purchasing attributes are analyzed, such as the price of the product and the delivery service, the range of products, the delivery time, the time window, and the travel time.
Sharing is caring: How non-financial incentives drive sustainable e-commerce delivery [42]5YesTransportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment (Elsevier)This study investigates how to encourage sustainable consumer decision making at the web store checkout page using only non-financial incentives such as information, ordering options, social media engagement, and social norm. It is shown that providing information on the ecological footprint of delivery options is the most decisive incentive and that the impact of sharing on social networks and social norms are positive.
Urban transformation toward a smart city: An e-commerce-induced path-dependent analysis [64]5NoAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)This article explores the changing dynamics of a city’s spatial structure with a specific focus on e-commerce induced changes in the retail landscape and analyzes division and fragmentation, reconceptualization, and relocation of retail stores. Based on the requirement for a path-dependent analysis, this paper calls for an ideological shift in the conceptualization of a smart city definition from a concept to a process.
Efficiency of light electric vehicles in last mile deliveries—Szczecin case study [123]4YesSustainable Cities and Society (Elsevier)The authors study the energy efficiency of electric vehicles under real conditions of package delivery operation. The results of the research showed a high potential of electric vehicles and the usefulness of electromobility in last-mile deliveries, in such a way that it allowed the implementation of electric charging vehicles in vehicle fleets in a real company.
E-grocery: Comparing the environmental impacts of the online and offline purchasing processes [50] 4YesInternational Journal of Logistics Research and Applications (Taylor and Francis)The authors apply an activity-based approach to assess the environmental impacts (in terms of kgCO2e) of online and offline purchasing processes in the Italian grocery industry, covering all purchasing phases: replenishment, pre-sale and sale, collection and assembly, delivery, and after-sales. The results indicate that electronic shopping is potentially more sustainable than physical shopping, with emissions ranging from 10% to 30% less.
Delivery to homes or collection points? A sustainability analysis for urban, urbanised and rural areas in Belgium [43]4YesTransport Reviews (Elsevier)The authors compare deliveries to stores serving as collection points and homes for online-ordered non-food products in Belgium. The results are evaluated based on their generated external costs and differentiated according to three area types: urban, urbanized, and rural areas. Considering the case-specific density of the collection points, the results indicate that home deliveries are preferred in rural and urbanized areas when solely considering the sustainability impact.
* OA: open access.

References

  1. Settey, T.; Gnap, J.; Beňová, D.; Pavličko, M.; Blažeková, O. The growth of e-commerce due to COVID-19 and the need for urban logistics centers using electric vehicles: Bratislava case study. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, Y.; Yang, K.; Hou, S.; Zhong, T.; Crush, J. Factors determining household-level food insecurity during covid-19 epidemic: A case of Wuhan, China. Food Nutr. Res. 2021, 65, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cheba, K.; Kiba-Janiak, M.; Baraniecka, A.; Kołakowski, T. Impact of external factors on e-commerce market in cities and its implications on environment. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 72, 103032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, C. Research on the Development Strategy of Fresh Food E-commerce Enterprises under COVID-19-Taking Ding Dong as an Example. In E3S Web of Conferences; Wen, F., Ziaei, S.M., Eds.; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2021; Volume 275. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, S.; Wang, Y.; Han, S.; Lim, M.K. Evaluation of fresh food logistics service quality using online customer reviews. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pu, M.; Chen, X.; Zhong, Y. Overstocked agricultural produce and emergency supply system in the COVID-19 pandemic: Responses from china. Foods 2021, 10, 3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Villa, R.; Monzón, A. Mobility restrictions and e-commerce: Holistic balance in madrid centre during COVID-19 lockdown. Economies 2021, 9, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ehrler, V.C.; Schöder, D.; Seidel, S. Challenges and perspectives for the use of electric vehicles for last mile logistics of grocery e-commerce—Findings from case studies in Germany. Res. Transp. Econ. 2021, 87, 100757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pourrahmani, E.; Jaller, M. Crowdshipping in last mile deliveries: Operational challenges and research opportunities. Socioecon. Plann. Sci. 2021, 78, 101063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cano, J.A.; Londoño-Pineda, A.; Castro, M.F.; Paz, H.B.; Rodas, C.; Arias, T. A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review on E-Marketplaces, Open Innovation, and Sustainability. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mangiaracina, R.; Perego, A.; Perotti, S.; Tumino, A. Assessing the environmental impact of logistics in online and offline B2C purchasing processes in the apparel industry. Int. J. Logist. Syst. Manag. 2016, 23, 98–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jaller, M.; Pahwa, A. Evaluating the environmental impacts of online shopping: A behavioral and transportation approach. Transp. Res. Part D 2020, 80, 102223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Arnold, F.; Cardenas, I.; Sörensen, K.; Dewulf, W. Simulation of B2C e-commerce distribution in Antwerp using cargo bikes and delivery points. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2018, 10, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mangiaracina, R.; Perego, A.; Seghezzi, A.; Tumino, A. Innovative solutions to increase last-mile delivery efficiency in B2C e-commerce: A literature review. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2019, 49, 901–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kiba-Janiak, M.; Marcinkowski, J.; Jagoda, A.; Skowrońska, A. Sustainable last mile delivery on e-commerce market in cities from the perspective of various stakeholders. Literature review. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 71, 102984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kawa, A.; Światowiec-Szczepańska, J. Logistics as a value in e-commerce and its influence on satisfaction in industries: A multilevel analysis. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2021, 36, 220–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, X.; Yuen, K.F.; Wong, Y.D.; Teo, C.C. E-consumer adoption of innovative last-mile logistics services: A comparison of behavioural models. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 2020, 31, 1381–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhu, Q.; Yu, L.; Luo, J.; Cao, S. AMOS-based analysis of factors influencing customer loyalty. In E3S Web of Conferences; Mansur, K.H.M., Fu, Y., Eds.; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2021; Volume 251. [Google Scholar]
  19. Rai, H.B.; Verlinde, S.; Macharis, C. Who is interested in a crowdsourced last mile? A segmentation of attitudinal profiles. Travel Behav. Soc. 2021, 22, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Seghezzi, A.; Mangiaracina, R.; Tumino, A.; Perego, A. ‘Pony express’ crowdsourcing logistics for last-mile delivery in B2C e-commerce: An economic analysis. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2021, 24, 456–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Prasertwit, T.; Kanchanasuntorn, K. Preliminary Study of Environmental Impact Related to E-commerce Activities in Thailand. In E3S Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2021; Volume 259, p. 03004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Viu-Roig, M.; Alvarez-Palau, E.J. The Impact of E-Commerce-Related Last-Mile Logistics on Cities: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Akıl, S.; Ungan, M.C. E-Commerce Logistics Service Quality: Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty. J. Electron. Commer. Organ. 2022, 20, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tzong-Ru, L.; Jan-Mou, L. Key factors in forming an e-marketplace: An empirical analysis. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2006, 5, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tran, L.T.T. Managing the effectiveness of e-commerce platforms in a pandemic. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 58, 102287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Manerba, D.; Mansini, R.; Zanotti, R. Attended Home Delivery: Reducing last-mile environmental impact by changing customer habits. IFAC PapersOnLine 2018, 51, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lagorio, A.; Pinto, R.; Golini, R. Research in urban logistics: A systematic literature review. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2016, 46, 908–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sivarajah, U.; Irani, Z.; Gupta, S.; Mahroof, K.; Lane, E.; Bd, B.; Kingdom, U. Role of big data and social media analytics for business to business sustainability: A participatory web context. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020, 86, 163–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dutta, P.; Mishra, A.; Khandelwal, S.; Katthawala, I. A multiobjective optimization model for sustainable reverse logistics in Indian E-commerce market. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 249, 119348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nürnberg, M. Analysis of using cargo bikes in urban logistics on the example of Stargard. Transp. Res. Procedia 2019, 39, 360–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wong, C.Y. Celebrating IJPDLM’s 50th anniversary: A reflection on its contributions and future directions. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2021, 51, 1049–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kiani Mavi, R.; Kiani Mavi, N.; Olaru, D.; Biermann, S.; Chi, S. Innovations in freight transport: A systematic literature evaluation and COVID implications. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2022. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Patella, S.M.; Grazieschi, G.; Gatta, V.; Marcucci, E. The Adoption of Green Vehicles in Last Mile Logistics: A Systematic Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zennaro, I.; Finco, S.; Calzavara, M.; Persona, A. Implementing E-Commerce from Logistic Perspective: Literature Review and Methodological Framework. Sustainability 2022, 14, 911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rai, H.B.; Dablanc, L. Hunting for treasure: A systematic literature review on urban logistics and e-commerce data. Transp. Rev. 2022, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Escursell, S.; Llorach-massana, P.; Roncero, M.B. Sustainability in e-commerce packaging: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 280, 124314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Al Mashalah, H.; Hassini, E.; Gunasekaran, A.; Bhatt (Mishra), D. The impact of digital transformation on supply chains through e-commerce: Literature review and a conceptual framework. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2022, 165, 102837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Na, H.S.; Kweon, S.J.; Park, K. Characterization and Design for Last Mile Logistics: A Review of the State of the Art and Future Directions. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009, 339, 332–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liberati, A.; Altman, D.G.; Tetzlaff, J.; Mulrow, C.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Ioannidis, J.P.A.; Clarke, M.; Devereaux, P.J.; Kleijnen, J.; Moher, D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009, 339, b2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sarkis-Onofre, R.; Catalá-López, F.; Aromataris, E.; Lockwood, C. How to properly use the PRISMA Statement. Syst. Rev. 2021, 10, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Buldeo Rai, H.; Broekaert, C.; Verlinde, S.; Macharis, C. Sharing is caring: How non-financial incentives drive sustainable e-commerce delivery. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2021, 93, 102794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mommens, K.; Buldeo Rai, H.; van Lier, T.; Macharis, C. Delivery to homes or collection points? A sustainability analysis for urban, urbanised and rural areas in Belgium. J. Transp. Geogr. 2021, 94, 103095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Prajapati, D.; Chan, F.T.S.; Chelladurai, H.; Lakshay, L.; Pratap, S. An Internet of Things Embedded Sustainable Supply Chain Management of B2B E-Commerce. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Prajapati, D.; Chan, F.T.S.; Daultani, Y.; Pratap, S. Sustainable vehicle routing of agro-food grains in the e-commerce industry. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2022, 1–26, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Prajapati, D.; Zhou, F.; Zhang, M.; Chelladurai, H.; Pratap, S. Sustainable logistics network design for multi-products delivery operations in B2B e-commerce platform. Sadhana Acad. Proc. Eng. Sci. 2021, 46, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Prajapati, D.; Kumar, M.M.; Pratap, S.; Chelladurai, H.; Zuhair, M. Sustainable Logistics Network Design for Delivery Operations with Time Horizons in B2B E-Commerce Platform. Logistics 2021, 5, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Seghezzi, A.; Mangiaracina, R. On-demand food delivery: Investigating the economic performances. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 2021, 49, 531–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Siragusa, C.; Seghezzi, A.; Tumino, A.; Mangiaracina, R. Assessing the impact of B2C e-commerce in the apparel industry: A logistics perspective. In Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics; Jahn, C., Kersten, W., Ringle, C.M., Eds.; Institute of Business Logistics and General Management, Hamburg University of Technology: Hamburg, Germany, 2021; Volume 32, pp. 571–597. [Google Scholar]
  50. Siragusa, C.; Tumino, A. E-grocery: Comparing the environmental impacts of the online and offline purchasing processes. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2021, 25, 1164–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gatta, V.; Marcucci, E.; Maltese, I.; Iannaccone, G. E-Groceries: A Channel Choice Analysis in Shanghai. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pfoser, S.; Herman, K.; Massimiani, A.; Brandtner, P.; Schauer, O. From Linear to Circular Packaging: Enablers and Challenges in the Fashion Industry. In Lecture Notes in Logistics; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 435–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pfoser, S.; Brandner, M.; Herman, K.; Steinbach, E.; Brandtner, P.; Schauer, O. Sustainable Transport Packaging: Evaluation and Feasibility for Different Use Cases. LOGI Sci. J. Transp. Logist. 2021, 12, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Settey, T.; Gnap, J.; Synák, F.; Skrúcaný, T.; Dočkalik, M. Research into the impacts of driving cycles and load weight on the operation of a light commercial electric vehicle. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Villa, R.; Monzón, A. A metro-based system as sustainable alternative for urban logistics in the era of e-commerce. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, C.-N.; Nguyen, N.-A.-T.; Dang, T.-T.; Lu, C.-M. A compromised decision-making approach to third-party logistics selection in sustainable supply chain using fuzzy ahp and fuzzy vikor methods. Mathematics 2021, 9, 886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, C.-N.; Dang, T.-T.; Nguyen, N.-A.-T. Outsourcing Reverse Logistics for E-Commerce Retailers: A Two-Stage Fuzzy Optimization Approach. Axioms 2021, 10, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Borghetti, F.; Caballini, C.; Carboni, A.; Grossato, G.; Maja, R.; Barabino, B. The Use of Drones for Last-Mile Delivery: A Numerical Case Study in Milan, Italy. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Silvestri, F.; Coppola, P. Assessing the impacts of e-commerce on future urban logistics scenarios: Case study of the city of Rome. Int. J. Transp. Econ. 2021, 48, 339–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Carotenuto, P.; Ceccato, R.; Gastaldi, M.; Giordani, S.; Rossi, R.; Salvatore, A. Comparing home and parcel lockers’ delivery systems: A math-heuristic approach. Transp. Res. Procedia 2022, 62, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Xie, G.; Huang, L.; Apostolidis, C.; Huang, Z.; Cai, W.; Li, G. Assessing consumer preference for overpackaging solutions in e-commerce. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 7951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hao, Z. Analysis on pollution hazards and recycling strategies of logistics packaging wastes of e-commerce enterprises. Nat. Environ. Pollut. Technol. 2021, 20, 1209–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Comi, A.; Savchenko, L. Last-mile delivering: Analysis of environment-friendly transport. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 74, 103213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Nahiduzzaman, K.; Ph, D.; Holland, M.; Sikder, S.K.; Ph, D.; Shaw, P.; Ph, D.; Hewage, K.; Ph, D.; Sadiq, R.; et al. Urban Transformation Toward a Smart City: An E-Commerce–Induced Path-Dependent Analysis. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 2021, 147, 04020060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Farooq, Q.; Fu, P.; Hao, Y.; Jonathan, T.; Zhang, Y. A Review of Management and Importance of E-Commerce Implementation in Service Delivery of Private Express Enterprises of China. SAGE Open 2019, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Deng, X.; Ouyang, Y. Cross-Border Supply Chain System Constructed by Complex Computer Blockchain for International Cooperation. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2022, 2022, 6221211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Guan, S. Smart E-commerce logistics construction model based on big data analytics. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2021, 40, 3015–3023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, H.-D.; Zheng, C.-F.; Xiao, X. An AMOS Model for Examining the Factors Influencing the Development of China Cross-Border E-Commerce Comprehensive Pilot Areas. Discret. Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2022, 2022, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zeng, Y.; Yang, X. Cross-border E-commerce Logistics Information Analysis Based on Cloud Clustering Mining. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Logistics and Systems Engineering; Zhang, H., Zhang, H., Eds.; Aussino Academic Publishing House: Wuhan, China, 2022; pp. 234–239. [Google Scholar]
  70. Giuffrida, M.; Jiang, H.; Mangiaracina, R. Investigating the relationships between uncertainty types and risk management strategies in cross-border e-commerce logistics. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2021, 32, 1406–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hehua, M. Application of Passive Wireless RFID Asset Management in Warehousing of Cross-Border E-Commerce Enterprises. J. Sens. 2021, 2021, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hong, L.H. Construction and Development Strategy of Cross-border E-commerce Ecosystem in Era of Digital Economy. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 60–65. [Google Scholar]
  73. Liu, Z.; Li, Z. A blockchain-based framework of cross-border e-commerce supply chain. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 52, 102059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Issaoui, Y.; Khiat, A.; Haricha, K.; Bahnasse, A.; Ouajji, H. An Advanced System to Enhance and Optimize Delivery Operations in a Smart Logistics Environment. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 6175–6193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Jharni, K.; Hlyal, M.; El Alami, J. Physical Internet: A Review of Mathematical Programming Models. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 2022, 100, 1071–1089. [Google Scholar]
  76. Yang, J.; Lau, H.C. A Learning and Optimization Framework for Collaborative Urban Delivery Problems with Alliances. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), 13004 LNCS; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 316–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Priyan, S.; Udayakumar, R.; Mala, P.; Prabha, M.; Ghosh, A. A sustainable dual-channel inventory model with trapezoidal fuzzy demand and energy consumption. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2022, 6, 100400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Stinson, M.; Mohammadian, A.K. Introducing CRISTAL: A model of collaborative, informed, strategic trade agents with logistics. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 2022, 13, 100539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hagen, T.; Scheel-Kopeinig, S. Would customers be willing to use an alternative (chargeable) delivery concept for the last mile? Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2021, 39, 100626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Xue, J.; Li, G.; Li, N. Does green and sustainable engagement benefit online platforms in supply chains? The role of green and public concern. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2022, 25, 678–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Xie, J.; Wang, L. Collaborative innovation of E-Commerce enterprises based on FPGA and convolutional neural network. Microprocess. Microsyst. 2021, 80, 103595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Haryanti, T.; Subriadi, A.P. E-commerce acceptance in the dimension of sustainability. J. Model. Manag. 2022, 17, 715–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ludowieg, A.R.; Sanchez-Diaz, I.; Kalahasthi, L.K. Using Machine Learning to Predict Freight Vehicles’ Demand for Loading Zones in Urban Environments. In Transportation Research Record; Sage Publications, Incorporated: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2022; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Castrellon, J.P.; Sanchez-Diaz, I. Using Data Analytics for Enhanced Smart Loading Zones Design. 2022; in revisión. [Google Scholar]
  85. Janowski, M. CSR and Postal Service Sustainable Development and Its Impact on Urban Environment at the Example of Courier Service Operator Solutions in Europe. In Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Lu, B.; Zhang, M.X.; Fan, Y.Q. A Feasibility Study of Urban Underground Logistics System—A Case Study of Shanghai. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; Vahaaho, I., Johansson, E., Eds.; IOP Publishing Ltd.: Bristol, UK, 2021; Volume 703. [Google Scholar]
  87. Wang, Y.; Wang, Y. Research on the Application of Environmentally Friendly Packaging Materials in the Sustainable Development of Logistics. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing Ltd.: Bristol, UK, 2021; Volume 781. [Google Scholar]
  88. Grant, D.B.; Banomyong, R.; Gibson, B.J. A brave new world for retail logistics and SCM in the 2020s and beyond. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2021, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Calvet, L.; Alvarez-Palau, E.J.; Viu, M.; Castillo, C.; Copado, P.; Juan, A.A. Promoting Sustainable and Intelligent Freight Transportation Systems in the Barcelona Metropolitan Area. Transp. Res. Procedia 2021, 58, 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Anosike, A.; Loomes, H.; Udokporo, C.K.; Garza-Reyes, J.A. Exploring the challenges of electric vehicle adoption in final mile parcel delivery. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2021, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Asian, S.; Pool, J.K.; Nazarpour, A.; Tabaeeian, R.A. On the importance of service performance and customer satisfaction in third-party logistics selection: An application of Kano model. Benchmarking 2019, 26, 1550–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Peppel, M.; Ringbeck, J.; Spinler, S. How will last-mile delivery be shaped in 2040? A Delphi-based scenario study. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2022, 177, 121493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kelly, J.; Marinov, M. Innovative Interior Designs for Urban Freight Distribution Using Light Rail Systems. Urban Rail Transit 2017, 3, 238–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ahmadi, E.; Wicaksono, H.; Valilai, O.F. Extending the Last Mile Delivery Routing Problem for Enhancing Sustainability by Drones Using a Sentiment Analysis Approach. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, IEEM 2021, Singapore, 13–16 December 2021; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 207–212. [Google Scholar]
  95. Huertas, J.I.; Serrano-Guevara, O.; Díaz-Ramírez, J.; Prato, D.; Tabares, L. Real vehicle fuel consumption in logistic corridors. Appl. Energy 2022, 314, 118921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Gatta, V.; Marcucci, E.; Nigro, M.; Serafini, S. Sustainable urban freight transport adopting public transport-based crowdshipping for B2C deliveries. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2019, 11, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Simoni, M.D.; Marcucci, E.; Gatta, V.; Claudel, C.G. Potential last-mile impacts of crowdshipping services: A simulation-based evaluation. Transportation 2020, 47, 1933–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. De Oliveira, L.K.; De Oliveira, R.L.M.; De Sousa, L.T.M.; De Paula Caliari, I.; De Oliveira Leite Nascimento, C. Analysis of accessibility from collection and delivery points: Towards the sustainability of the e-commerce delivery. Urbe 2019, 11, e20190048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Beckers, J.; Verhetsel, A. The sustainability of the urban layer of e-commerce deliveries: The Belgian collection and delivery point networks. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2021, 29, 2300–2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Altuntaş Vural, C.; Aktepe, Ç. Why do some sustainable urban logistics innovations fail? The case of collection and delivery points. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Serrano-Hernandez, A.; Ballano, A.; Faulin, J. Selecting freight transportation modes in last-mile urban distribution in pamplona (Spain): An option for drone delivery in smart cities. Energies 2021, 14, 4748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Mehmood, M.S.; Jin, A.; Rehman, A.; Ahamad, M.I.; Li, G. Spatial variability and accessibility of collection and delivery points in Nanjing, China. Comput. Urban Sci. 2022, 2, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Calabrò, G.; Pira, M.L.; Giuffrida, N.; Fazio, M.; Inturri, G.; Ignaccolo, M. Modelling the dynamics of fragmented vs. consolidated last-mile e-commerce deliveries via an agent-based model. Transp. Res. Procedia 2022, 62, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Luo, N. Innovation of E-Commerce Development Model under the Background of Artificial Intelligence and Wireless Communication. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2022, 2022, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Stojanov, M. Q-commerce—The next generation e-commerce. Bus. Manag. 2022, 2022, 17–34. [Google Scholar]
  106. Giampoldaki, E.; Madas, M.; Zeimpekis, V. A state-of-practice review of urban consolidation centres: Practical insights and future challenges. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2021, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Shengjin, W.; Ying, C. Classification and ways of China urban express terminal distribution service modes. In E3S Web of Conferences; Anpo, M., Song, F., Eds.; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2021; Volume 236. [Google Scholar]
  108. Van Loon, P.; Deketele, L.; Dewaele, J.; McKinnon, A.; Rutherford, C. A comparative analysis of carbon emissions from online retailing of fast moving consumer goods. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 106, 478–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Bae, K.-H.; Mustafee, N.; Lazarova-Molnar, S.; Zheng, L. Hybrid modeling of collaborative freight transportation planning using agent-based simulation, auction-based mechanisms, and optimization. Simulation 2022, 98, 753–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zhuansun, F.; Chen, J.; Chen, W.; Sun, Y. The Mechanism of Evolution and Balance for e-Commerce Ecosystem under Blockchain. Sci. Program. 2021, 2021, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Shang, X.; Yang, K.; Jia, B.; Gao, Z.; Ji, H. Heuristic algorithms for the bi-objective hierarchical multimodal hub location problem in cargo delivery systems. Appl. Math. Model. 2021, 91, 412–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Yang, Z.; Chen, X.; Pan, R.; Yuan, Q. Exploring location factors of logistics facilities from a spatiotemporal perspective: A case study from Shanghai. J. Transp. Geogr. 2022, 100, 103318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Wang, M.; Miao, L.; Zhang, C. Green Location-Routing Problem with Delivery Options. In Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics; Yang, H., Qiu, R., Chen, W., Eds.; Springer Science and Business Media B.V.: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 215–228. [Google Scholar]
  114. Bai, X. Research on Benefit Distribution of E-commerce Rice Sales Supply Chain Based on Cooperative Game. In Proceedings of the 33rd Chinese Control and Decision Conference, CCDC 2021, Kunming, China, 22–24 May 2021; pp. 4190–4195. [Google Scholar]
  115. Gruchmann, T.; Schmidt, I.; Lubjuhn, S.; Seuring, S.; Bouman, M. Informing logistics social responsibility from a consumer-choice-centered perspective. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2019, 30, 96–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Perkumiene, D.; Osamede, A.; Andriukaitiene, R.; Beriozovas, O. The impact of COVID-19 on the transportation and logistics industry. Probl. Perspect. Manag. 2021, 19, 458–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Ignat, B.; Chankov, S. Do e-commerce customers change their preferred last-mile delivery based on its sustainability impact? Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2020, 31, 521–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Lai, N.Y.G.; Kuah, A.T.H.; Kim, C.H.; Wong, K.H. Toward sustainable express deliveries for online shopping: Reusing packaging materials through reverse logistics. Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev. 2022, 64, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Vieira, M.; Malaquias, T.; Ketsmur, V.; Ketsmur, V.; Au-Yong-Oliveira, M. Towards a More Sustainable E-commerce in the Post-COVID-19 Recovery of Portuguese Companies. In Communications in Computer and Information Science; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; Volume 1485, pp. 600–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Ju, C. Research on the Challenges and Strategies of Enterprises in Reverse Logistics Cost Control Under B2C Mode. Smart Innov. Syst. Technol. 2022, 250, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Davidavičienė, V.; Majzoub, M.A. Performance of reverse logistics in electronic commerce: A case study from Lebanon and Syria. Transport 2021, 36, 260–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Xiao, Z.; Yuan, Q.; Sun, Y.; Sun, X. New paradigm of logistics space reorganization: E-commerce, land use, and supply chain management. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 2021, 9, 100300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Iwan, S.; Nürnberg, M.; Jedliński, M.; Kijewska, K. Efficiency of light electric vehicles in last mile deliveries—Szczecin case study. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 74, 103167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sustainability 14 12247 g001 550
Figure 1. Documents published in Scopus on sustainable e-commerce logistics.
Figure 1. Documents published in Scopus on sustainable e-commerce logistics.
Sustainability 14 12247 g001
Sustainability 14 12247 g002 550
Figure 2. Documents published in Web of Science on sustainable e-commerce logistics.
Figure 2. Documents published in Web of Science on sustainable e-commerce logistics.
Sustainability 14 12247 g002
Sustainability 14 12247 g003 550
Figure 3. Main topics addressed in the literature.
Figure 3. Main topics addressed in the literature.
Sustainability 14 12247 g003
Table
Table 1. Leading affiliations.
Table 1. Leading affiliations.
AffiliationDocs% Docs *
Politecnico di Milano (Italy)65.7%
Indian Institute of Information Technology, Design and Manufacturing Jabalpur (India)43.8%
Indian Institute of Technology Banaras Hindu University (India)43.8%
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (Belgium)32.9%
Università degli Studi di Padova (Italy)21.9%
Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata (Italy)21.9%
Shanxi University (China)21.9%
University of Žilina (Slovakia)21.9%
CNRS Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (France)21.9%
Università degli Studi Roma Tre (Italy)21.9%
Høgskolen i Molde (Norway)21.9%
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (Spain)21.9%
Wroclaw University of Economics and Business (Poland)21.9%
Macau University of Science and Technology (Macau)21.9%
Tongji University (China)21.9%
Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (Viet Nam)21.9%
Universidad Camilo José Cela (Spain)21.9%
National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology (Taiwan)21.9%
Univ Gustave Eiffel (France)21.7%
* Documents in which one or several authors with corresponding institutional affiliation participate.
Table
Table 2. Scientific output per country.
Table 2. Scientific output per country.
CountryDocs% Docs
China3331.4%
Italy1312.4%
Spain87.6%
India87.6%
Poland76.7%
United Kingdom65.7%
United States65.7%
South Korea65.7%
France54.8%
Germany43.8%
Belgium43.8%
Taiwan43.8%
Austria32.9%
Singapore32.9%
Table
Table 3. Most recurrent subject areas in the research topic.
Table 3. Most recurrent subject areas in the research topic.
Subject AreaDocs% Docs% Acum.
Social Sciences4718.8%18.8%
Environmental Science3915.6%34.4%
Energy3614.4%48.8%
Engineering2610.4%59.2%
Computer Science239.2%68.4%
Business, Management, and Accounting228.8%77.2%
Decision Sciences187.2%84.4%
Mathematics135.2%89.6%
Others2610.4%100.0%
Table
Table 4. Publication sources with the greatest number of published documents.
Table 4. Publication sources with the greatest number of published documents.
SourceDocs% DocsType of SourceH-Index *Quartile *
Sustainability (MDPI)2624.8%Journals109Q1
International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications (Taylor and Francis)54.8%Journals38Q1
E3s Web of Conferences (EDP Sciences)32.9%Conferences and Proceedings28N/A
IOPConference Series Earth and Environmental Science (IOP Publishing)32.9%Conferences and Proceedings34N/A
Sustainable Cities and Society (Elsevier)32.9%Journals82Q1
Transportation Research Procedia (Elsevier)32.9%Conferences and Proceedings51N/A
Journal of Transport Geography (Elsevier)21.9%Journals118Q1
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research (MDPI)21.9%Journals33Q2
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives (Elsevier)21.9%Journals25Q1
* Based on the results of the SCImago ranking in 2021.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cano, J.A.; Londoño-Pineda, A.; Rodas, C. Sustainable Logistics for E-Commerce: A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12247. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912247

AMA Style

Cano JA, Londoño-Pineda A, Rodas C. Sustainable Logistics for E-Commerce: A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability. 2022; 14(19):12247. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912247

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cano, Jose Alejandro, Abraham Londoño-Pineda, and Carolina Rodas. 2022. "Sustainable Logistics for E-Commerce: A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis" Sustainability 14, no. 19: 12247. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912247

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop