Next Article in Journal
Effect of Organic Fertilizers on Avocado Trees (Cvs. Fuerte, Hass, Lamb Hass) in Western Crete, a Cool Subtropical Region
Next Article in Special Issue
The Net Influence of Drought on Grassland Productivity over the Past 50 Years
Previous Article in Journal
Human Circular Tourism as the Tourism of Tomorrow: The Role of Travellers in Achieving a More Sustainable and Circular Tourism
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Future Maize Yield Changes and Adaptation Strategies in China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Changes in Vegetation Period Length in Slovakia under the Conditions of Climate Change for 1931–2110

1
Research Centre Agrobiotech, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia
2
Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Engineeering, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(19), 12220; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912220
Submission received: 10 August 2022 / Revised: 20 September 2022 / Accepted: 23 September 2022 / Published: 26 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate Change Research toward Sustainable Agriculture)

Abstract

:
The global mean near-surface temperature between 2012 and 2021 was 1.11 to 1.14 °C warmer than the pre-industrial level. This makes it the warmest period on record. The aim of this article was to investigate vegetation period changes (onset and termination of the temperature T ≥ 5 °C, T ≥ 10 °C, and T ≥ 15 °C) due to climate change from the average air temperature for the periods 1931–1961, 1961–1991, and 1991–2020 for 24 stations in Slovakia and forecast the length of vegetation periods for the periods 2021–2050, 2051–2080, and 2081–2110. The number of days with these characteristic temperatures was used as an input dataset, from which map outputs were generated in ArcGIS software. Spatial analysis of the vegetation periods in the past, present, and future showed an earlier start of the vegetation period in spring and a later ending in autumn during the last 30 years. The maximum duration of the vegetation period will expand from the south to the north of Slovakia. Future scenarios showed an extension of the vegetation period duration. On the other hand, this potential advantage for crop cultivation is limited by a lack of arable land in the north of Slovakia and by a lack of precipitation in the south of Slovakia.

1. Introduction

Worldwide climate changes will have major impacts on the ecological, social, economic, and political aspects of human society in the next few decades [1]. Extreme temperature events have significantly increased and affected various areas of the globe [2,3,4]. The latest findings about the changing climate, soil degradation, water scarcity, and greenhouse gas emissions have brought major challenges to sustainable agriculture [5]. Earth has warmed by 1.2 °C ± 0.1 °C since the pre-industrial period [6]. Temperatures have increased by an average of 1.2 °C during the last century in the European continent. This is an increase in temperature of about 0.45 °C over the last three decades. This trend showed that the increase in the average temperature was 0.1 °C every 10 years over the last century all over the Europe. The temperature increase has doubled in the last 30 years [7].
According to global climate forecasts published by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) on 9 July 2020, the average annual global temperature was expected to be at least 1 °C higher each year in the next years (2020–2024) than in the pre-industrial period (average global temperature in the period 1850–1900) and it is very likely to be in the range of 0.91–1.59 °C. The scenarios of the 12 global climate models also indicated that there is approximately a 20% chance that the global temperature anomaly will exceed 1.5 °C in at least 1 year in the period 2020–2024 [8]. The Met Office’s latest climate projections showed that the increase in the global temperature will continue in the coming years, with a 48% probability that at least one of the years between 2022 and 2026 will reach a temperature anomaly of 1.5 °C or more compared to the pre-industrial average [9]. Some aspects of climate change could bring benefits for agriculture, for example, longer vegetation periods and warmer temperatures. However, climate change has negative impacts on food production due to increased water deficits [10].
Global warming in Slovakia has resulted in an increased average annual air temperature of 1.1 °C over the last 100 years (1901–2000). This fact is based on observations from the observatory in Hurbanovo, which were started in 1871. The warmest 12 years have been recorded since the early 1990s. Concurrently, atmospheric precipitation has decreased by an average of 5.6 % (1901–2000) [11]. In Slovakia, there will be a faster onset of warm and dry weather in the spring. Another expected demonstration of climate change in Slovakia is the increase in the daily maximum and minimum air temperature [12]. By 2050, a significant increase in the number of summer and tropical days is expected, in addition to a decrease in the number of frost and ice days [13]. Due to the higher air temperature, the rate of evaporation from the Earth’s surface will also increase, which will create conditions for a longer droughts throughout Slovakia, especially in the southern part [12].
The aim of this article was to determine this change by calculating the vegetation period from the average temperature for the years 1931–1961, 1961–1991, and 1991–2020 at 24 stations in Slovakia and forecast the length of the vegetation period for the periods 2021–2050, 2051–2080, and 2081–2110. The average rainfall was also evaluated for these periods (1931–2020) at the same stations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The field of interest of this study is the Slovak Republic (Figure 1). This country is located in central Europe within the northern latitudes from 47°44′21″ up to 49°36′48″ and eastern longitudes from 16°50′56″ up to 22°33′53″ [7,13]. The area of Slovakia is 49,035 km2 and the surface is characterized by significant diversity and represents several geographical types. From the lowlands in the south, the country passes through a range of hills and highlands to the mountains, represented in the north. About two-thirds of the territory is the Carpathian Mountains. One-third of the country’s territory belongs to the Pannonian Basin, within which there are 3 areas in Slovakia: Záhorská Lowland in the west, Danube Lowland in the southwest, and Východoslovenská Lowland in the southeast [14].
The country is located in a temperate climate zone with a regular seasonal cycle. Slovakia has various climates relative to its area because of the variations in altitude, significant terrain segmentation, the variety of natural conditions in its territory, and different conditions for air circulation in the individual regions [15]. The shape of the territory in the west-east direction determines the differences in the temperature and precipitation conditions of western and eastern Slovakia. Based on long-term air temperature measurements, the warmest area is the Danube Lowland. The average air temperature is −1 to −2 °C in January, and 18 to 21 °C in July. The annual average is 9 to 11 °C. In the area of Východoslovenská Lowland, the air temperature is, on average, slightly lower. In the basins and valleys of rivers, the average annual air temperature reaches values in the range of 6 to 8 °C while in the highest basins, it is less than 6 °C. In Slovakia, the average annual rainfall varies from less than 500 mm (lowlands) to approximately 2000 mm in the High Tatras mountains [16].
Figure 1. Locality of the Slovak Republic (red) in Europe. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [17] 2011, Tubs.
Figure 1. Locality of the Slovak Republic (red) in Europe. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [17] 2011, Tubs.
Sustainability 14 12220 g001

2.2. Data Analysis

For this study, monthly air temperatures in the periods 1931–1960, 1961–1990, and 1991–2020 at 24 meteorological stations in Slovakia were analyzed (Figure 2). Datasets for the period 1931–1960 were obtained from Agroclimatic conditions of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic [18]; for the period 1961–1990, from Practical Biometeorology [19]; and for the current period 1991–2020, from Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHMI). Precipitation was compared according to the seasons for individual periods. The reference value was the period 1931–1960 and the periods 1961–1990 and 1991–2020 were compared with the reference period.

2.2.1. Length of the Vegetation Period—Calculation

Determination of the onset and termination of temperatures ≥5 °C, ≥10 °C, and ≥15 °C is closely related to many physiological and biological processes in nature [14,19]. The onset and termination of temperatures ≥5 °C determines a significant vegetation period because this temperature activates physiological processes in plants. At this temperature, the growth and development of vegetation begins in spring and ends at this temperature in autumn. The onset and termination of temperatures ≥10 °C determines the main vegetation period, and the onset and termination of temperatures ≥15 °C determines the vegetation in summer [19].
The vegetation periods were calculated for each meteorological station according to the following formulas [14]:
onset   of   temperatures :   r v = R T n   T 2 T 1 T 2   ( days )
termination   of   temperatures :   r p = R T 1   T u T 1 T 2   ( days )
where:
  • Tn—onset temperature (°C);
  • Tu—termination temperature (°C);
  • T1—the nearest average monthly temperature above the onset or termination of temperature (°C);
  • T2—the nearest average monthly temperature below the onset or termination of temperature (°C);
  • R—the difference in days between the middle of the months with the average temperature T2 and the average temperature T1, which is expressed as an average number R = 30;
  • rv—difference in days between the middle of the month with temperature T2 and the date of onset of temperature Tn;
  • rp—difference in days between the middle of the month with temperature T2 and the date of termination of temperature Tu.
An example of the calculation is shown in Figure S1.

2.2.2. Length of the Vegetation Period—Prediction

The future scenarios of the vegetation periods were based on the assumption of the development of climate change and a linear trend of temperature increase according to the Paris Agreement in 2015 [9,20]. For each meteorological station, the maximum duration of the vegetation period was calculated by the mathematical function linear trendline. The linear trendline equation uses the least squares methods to seek the slope and intercept coefficients such that [21]:
y = bx + a
where:
  • b—slope of the trendline;
  • a—y-intercept, which is the expected mean value of y when all x variables are equal to 0.
According to this equation, probable trends were estimated individually for the time horizons of 2021–2050, 2051–2080, and 2081–2110. These data were used as an input dataset for the creation of the map outputs.

2.3. Map Processing in ArcGIS

In ArcGIS Desktop v.10.2.2. (ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA), data (point data, i.e., location of meteorological stations and separate number of days for temperatures ≥5 °C, ≥10 °C, and ≥15 °C) from the meteorological stations (Figure 2) were loaded and transformed to a point vector model (*.shp) in the S-JTSK coordinate system [7,22]. To obtain data between stations, the interpolation methods provided in ArcGIS software Topo to Raster were used. This tool is an interpolation method that was created especially for the design of hydrologically correct digital elevation models (DEMs). The basis of the ANUDEM (Australian National University, Canberra, Australia) program was created by Michael Hutchinson [23,24]. The interpolation procedure was designed to take advantage of the types of input data commonly available and the known characteristics of elevation surfaces. This method uses an iterative finite difference interpolation technique. It is optimized to have the computational efficiency of local interpolation methods, such as inverse distance weighted (IDW) interpolation, without losing the surface continuity of global interpolation methods, such as Kriging and Spline. It is essentially a discretized thin plate spline technique [23,25,26,27,28,29]. The raster output cell size (resolution) was set to 100 m.
For the creation of the map outputs, it was necessary to separate the land on which the vegetation periods were determined from the forest area. To separate “Forests and seminatural areas” from the rest of the area, CORINE Land Cover (CLC) was used (Table 1). CLC is the oldest dataset of the Copernicus Land Monitoring Service (CLMS). CLC was specified to standardize data collection related to land in Europe to support environmental policy development. The nomenclature includes 44 classes in 5 main land cover/use groups: artificial surfaces, agriculture, forests and seminatural areas, wetlands, and water. The results of the CLC inventories can be downloaded from the CLMS site free of charge for all users for any use [30].

3. Results

3.1. Great Vegetation Period

The great vegetation period during 1931–1960 (Figure 3a) in the north of Slovakia (station Oravská Lesná) lasted for 179 days from 21 April until 16 October. In the south of Slovakia (station Hurbanovo), the period with temperatures T ≥ 5 °C lasted 244 days from 17 March until 15 November. The great vegetation period also lasted a comparatively long time in the years 1961–1990 (Figure 3b), from 183 days in the north to 244 days in the south. Change is visible in the last 30 years (Figure 3c). The onset of the great vegetation period has shifted in the north to 192 days from 14 April until 22 October and to 257 days from 10 March until 21 November in the south, which is an extension of 13 days in the period 1991–2020.
With the current trend of temperature development, this extension of the vegetation period is expected, especially in the northern regions of Slovakia. We assume that in the period 2021–2050 (Figure 3d), the vegetation period will be extended to 198 days in the north and 261 days in the south. In the period 2051–2080 (Figure 3e), the vegetation period will be 203 days in the north and 269 days in the south. For the last period 2081–2110 (Figure 3f), we assume an increase in the vegetation period to 208 days in the north and 276 days in the south. Compared to the period 1931–1960, this is an increase of approximately 30 days.

3.2. Main Vegetation Period

The main vegetation period in 1931–1960 (Figure 4a) at the Oravská Lesná station lasted 120 days (from 20 May until 16 September). In the south, in Hurbanovo, this period (temperatures T ≥ 10 °C) was 187 days (12 April until 15 October). During the period 1961–1990 (Figure 4b), the number of days of the vegetation period almost did not change. Compared to the years 1931–1960, there were differences of ±3 days at the individual stations, except for the Prievidza and Nitra stations, where this increase was by 6 days. A significant increase occurred in the period 1991–2020 (Figure 4c). In the north, the vegetation period was extended to 129 days (12 May–17 September) and to 200 days in the south (4 April–20 October), which is an increase from 9 to 13 days.
The predicted development of the main vegetation period for the years 2021–2050 (Figure 4d) showed an increase from 12 to 18 days: 132 days in the north to 205 days in the south. For the years 2051–2080 (Figure 4e), the assumption of the vegetation period is from 136 to 212 days, and from 141 to 218 days for the years 2081–2110 (Figure 4f). This represents an increase compared to the years 1931–1960 of 12 days in the north and 31 days in the south of Slovakia.

3.3. Vegetation Summer

The vegetation summer lasted 55 days in the years 1931–1960 (Figure 5a) at the Poprad station from 25 June until 18 August. In the south of Slovakia, it was 133 days from 13 May until 22 September at Bratislava Airport station. In the years 1961–1990 (Figure 5b), the vegetation summer was the shortest at the northern stations Liesek (25 days), Poprad (33 days), and Červený Kláštor (51 days). The longest vegetation period was recorded for the southern stations Hurbanovo (130 days), Nitra (128 days), and Bratislava Airport (126 days). The lower number of days of the vegetation summer in the period 1961–1990 was influenced by the colder decade of 1971–1980. During the periods of 1931–1960 and 1961–1990, the vegetation summer did not occur at the Telgárt and Oravská Lesná stations. At these stations, an increase from 0 to almost 57 days (Figure 5c) was recorded over the last 30 years (1991–2020).
The prediction for the period 2021–2050 (Figure 5d) indicates an extension of the vegetation period from 55 days in the north to 140 days in the south. In the years 2051–2080 (Figure 5e), the vegetation summer will extend from 58 to 148 days. The assumption for the years 2081–2110 (Figure 5f) is that the length of the vegetation summer will be 61 days in the north (Liesek station) and 153 days in the south (Hurbanovo station). Compared to the years 1931–1960, there is an increase of 20 days in the south and up to 61 days in the north. In the north, this increase is so extreme because there was no vegetation summer here in 1931–1960. If we compare the period 2080–2110 with the years 1991–2020, when the vegetation summer appeared in the north, this increase is about 10 days.
As vegetation periods are becoming longer, the temporal distribution of precipitation is also changing, with more frequent dry periods. In the period 1931–2020, there were several dry periods in Slovakia in most locations in Slovakia. These periods occurred for varying lengths of time during the 1930s and 1940s. Dry periods also occurred in the years 1964, 1973, 1974, 1992, 2000, 2003, 2006, 2007, 2011, 2012, 2016, and 2020.
The analyzed results of the precipitation in the years 1931–1960, 1961–1990, and 1991–2020 clearly show that the distribution of precipitation is changing (Table 2). Summers are becoming drier and summer rainfall is shifting to the autumn months. The results indicate that the southern regions are suffering from a greater lack of precipitation in the summer while the northern part of Slovakia appears to have greater precipitation, especially in the last period.

4. Discussion

4.1. Changes in Vegetation Period Duration

Increases in air temperature are shown by long-term measurement step by step. It is expected that the anomaly of the global annual temperature will be 1.1 to 1.7 °C higher than the pre-industrial average compared to the period 2022–2026 [9]. The development of the vegetation period length is one of the significant consequences of climate change. An extension of the vegetation period duration was proven not only by our research but also by others research in the regions of Slovakia and the central European region. According to Burić et al. [31], the number of days with a daily maximum temperature above 25 °C in Montenegro has increased since the 1980s. Unkašević et al. [32] reported the temperature indices in Serbia and the climate has tended to become warmer over the last 61 years. Popov et al.’s [33] analyses showed a decreasing trend in the number of frost days in Bosnia and Herzegovina since the 1990s and particularly since the beginning of the 21st century. According to Sar et al.’s [34] research on the representative concentration pathway scenarios RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5, the vegetation period in the Inner West Anatolia subregion could extend by 20 to 40 days. Olszewski and Żmudzka [35] analyzed data in Poland and reported an increase in the length of the vegetation period from 1 to 3 days per decade.
Several published studies [13,36,37] that focused on Slovakia showed similar conclusions to our study. Valšíková-Frey et al. [36] analyzed predictions for a sooner potential beginning of seeding (25–30 days earlier) and later possible harvest (10 to 15 days) in the year 2075 in Hurbanovo (Slovakia). Changes in the length of the vegetation period for fruit and root vegetables in field conditions were analyzed by Špánik et al. [37]. They forecasted a prolongation of the vegetation period length by about 21–26% for several species of vegetables in Hurbanovo and Liptovský Hrádok in 2075. Changes in temperature development in Slovakia and future predictions were described by Čimo et al. [13]. This author also dealt with changes in the length of the vegetation period of Capsicum annuum, Brassica oleracea var. capitata, Beta vulgaris subsp. Vulgaris, Daucus carota L., and Solanum lycopersicum L. [7,38].

4.2. Consequences of Changing Air Temperature

Climate change leads to growth in the global temperature. This fact have a positive consequence for crop production. On the other hand, taking advantage of this climate change outcome is questionable due to the predicted higher evapotranspiration and water shortages. Climate change also results in more frequent weather extremes such as heat waves. Higher temperatures cause increased mortality, lower productivity, and can damage infrastructure. A shift in the geographical distribution of climate zones is expected [39]. Individual plant species react differently to temperature during their life cycle with phenological reactions, i.e., stages of development. Each species has a specified maximum and minimum range of growing temperatures [40]. As a result of the increased temperatures, plants ripen faster, which changes their developmental stages. This can affect crop rotation and the ability to efficiently and profitably manage fields for farmers. This could lead to double cropping and the use of cover crops. Earlier growth can also affect the habitus of the plant, which does not reach the required one. Accelerated plant growth places pressure on processes in the soil. Water and nutrients stored in the soil do not have enough time to reach the plant at the required cultivation stage. This reduces the production of grains, forages, and fruits and vegetables [41].
Due to the changing climate, European countries are already facing more frequent, severe, and longer-lasting droughts. This is the main barrier to using increasing vegetation period lengths as an advantage. With a global average temperature growth of 3 °C, it is projected that droughts will double [40]. Crop production is highly sensitive to the climate. Correct plant selection is linked to long-term trends in average rainfall and temperature [42]. Agricultural crops have different water needs. A long-lasting drought can reduce crop yields because water and soil moisture decrease and are unavailable for crop growth [43].
As the climate heats up, precipitation patterns change, evaporation increases, glaciers melt, and sea levels rise [39]. Changes in the intensity and amount of rain/snow mix for a location are expected to increase the management of water delivery to plants at the right time through irrigation systems. Extreme rainfall can be as damaging as the occurrence of too little rainfall due to the increase in flooding events, greater erosion, and decreased soil quality [41]. Extreme precipitation (from a short-term to multi-day duration) has shown an increasing trend in recent decades. It is assumed that it will intensify in the future due to global warming. Short-term precipitation extremes are also more sensitive to warming than long-term precipitation extremes [44]. Rain-induced flooding and waterlogging, occurring in many regions of the world, are disasters for farmers, often causing significant damage to crop production [45].
Future scenarios for Slovakia shown an extension of the vegetation period duration. On the other hand, this potential is limited by the lack of arable land in the mountainous areas [7]. These areas have only very-low- or medium-productivity agricultural soils [46].
There will always be some uncertainty in the correlation between climate scenarios and agricultural yields [42]; however, with climate change, it is necessary to change crop production strategies.

5. Conclusions

The aim of this work was to determine the changes in the temperature trends from 1931 to 2020. Maps of the vegetation period duration development were created based on the analysis of the air temperature changes for 2021–2050, 2051–2080, and 2081–2110. Spatial analysis of the vegetation periods in the past, present, and future pointed to:
  • A potential earlier start of the vegetation periods in spring and a later ending in autumn in the future;
  • The length of the vegetation periods will extend more in the south than in the north of the Slovak Republic;
  • A general trend of extension in the regions with the longest maximum vegetation period after the decade 1991–2020; and
  • Changes in the distribution of precipitation.
Although the future scenarios showed a possible extension of the length of the vegetation period, in the northern part of Slovakia, this potential is limited by the availability of arable land and is limited by rainfall shortages in the south, which causes a decrease in the soil water content. These results can be used by scientists and, especially, farmers to propose adaptation strategies. However, further research and development of different forecasting models is needed.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su141912220/s1, Figure S1: Example of calculation the onset and termination of temperature ≥ 5.0 °C for year 2019 at meteorological station Nitra.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Č. and V.K.; methodology, J.Č.; software, J.P.; validation, V.K., J.Č. and A.T.; formal analysis, V.K.; investigation, V.K.; resources, J.Č. and V.K.; data curation, J.P.; writing—original draft preparation, V.K. and A.T.; writing—review and editing, V.K. and A.T.; visualization, J.P.; supervision, J.Č.; project administration, J.Č.; funding acquisition, A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This publication was supported by the Operational Program Integrated Infrastructure within the project: Demand-driven research for the sustainable and inovative food, Drive4SIFood 313011V336, cofinanced by the European Regional Development Fund; by the Cultural and Educational Grant Agency no. KEGA 031SPU-4/2021 and by the Grant Agency of SUA in Nitra no. 19-GASPU-2021.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This publication was created in cooperation with the Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHMI).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dale, V.H. The Relationship Between Land-Use Change and Climate Change. Ecol. Appl. 1997, 7, 753–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Qi, X.; Gao, M.; Zhu, T.; Li, S.; He, S.; Yang, J. Mapping Temperature Changes. In Atlas of Global Change Risk of Population and Economic Systems; IHDP/Future Earth-Integrated Risk Governance Project Series; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 15–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Baettig, M.B.; Wild, M.; Imboden, D.M. A climate change index: Where climate change may be most prominent in the 21st century. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2007, 34, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yetemen, O.; Saco, P.M.; Istanbulluoglu, E. Ecohydrology controls the geomorphic response to climate change. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2019, 46, 8852–8861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Horák, J.; Kotuš, T.; Toková, L.; Aydın, E.; Igaz, D.; Šimanský, V. A Sustainable Approach for Improving Soil Properties and Reducing N2O Emissions Is Possible through Initialand Repeated Biochar Application. Agronomy 2021, 11, 582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Song, F.; Zhang, G.J.; Ramanathan, V.; Leung, L.R. Trends in surface equivalent potential temperature: A more comprehensive metric for global warming and weather extremes. PNAS 2022, 119, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Čimo, J.; Aydın, E.; Šinka, K.; Tárník, A.; Kišš, V.; Halaj, P.; Toková, L.; Kotuš, T. Change in the Length of the Vegetation Period of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), White Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata) and Carrot (Daucus carota L.) Due to Climate Change in Slovakia. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Markovič, L.; Pecho, J. Globálna Teplota Môže Už do Roku 2024 Prekročiť Hodnotu Oteplenia +1.5 °C [By 2024, the Global Temperature may Exceed the Warming Value of +1.5 °C]. Available online: https://www.shmu.sk/sk/?page=2049&id=1070 (accessed on 19 July 2022). (In Slovak).
  9. Pecho, J.; Markovič, L. Pravdepodobnosť, Že Globálna Teplota do Roku 2026 Prekročí Oteplenie +1.5 °C sa Zvýšila na Takmer 50% [The Probability that the Global Temperature will Exceed +1.5 °C by 2026 has Increased to almost 50 %]. Available online: https://www.shmu.sk/sk/?page=2049&id=1219 (accessed on 19 July 2022). (In Slovak).
  10. Zhang, X.; Cai, X. Climate change impacts on global agricultural water deficit. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2013, 40, 1111–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Prejavy Klimatickej Zmeny na Globálnej Úrovni [Manifestations of Climate Change at the Global Level]. Available online: https://www.shmu.sk/sk/?page=1379 (accessed on 19 July 2022). (In Slovak).
  12. Peterová, E.; Garčár, I. Klimatická Zmena a Jej Vplyv na Zdravie a Majetok na Slovensku [Climate Change and Its Impact on Health and Property in Slovakia]. Available online: https://www.shmu.sk/sk/?page=2049&id=927 (accessed on 19 July 2022). (In Slovak).
  13. Čimo, J.; Šinka, K.; Novotná, B.; Tárník, A.; Aydin, E.; Toková, L.; Kišš, V.; Kotuš, T. Change in Temperature Conditions of Slovakia to the Reference Period 1961-2010 and their Expected Changes to Time Horizons Years 2035, 2050, 2075 and 2100 under the Conditions of Changing Climate. J. Ecol. Eng. 2020, 21, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Čimo, J.; Špánik, F.; Šiška, B.; Tomlain, J.; Horák, J. Praktická Biometeorológia [Practical Biometeorology]; SPU: Nitra, Slovakia, 2012; p. 201. ISBN 978-80-552-0771-1. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
  15. Melo, M.; Lapin, M.; Pecho, J. Climate in the Past and Present in the Slovak Landscapes—The Central European Context. In Landscapes and Landforms of Slovakia; Lehotský, M., Boltižiar, M., Eds.; World Geomorphological Landscapes; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Klimatické Pomery Slovenskej Republiky [Climatic Conditions of the Slovak Republic]. Available online: https://www.shmu.sk/sk/?page=1064 (accessed on 19 July 2022). (In Slovak).
  17. Slovakia in Europe. Available online: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Slovakia_in_Europe.svg (accessed on 19 July 2022).
  18. Kurpelová, M.; Coufal, L.; Čulík, J. Agroklimatické podmienky ČSSR [Agroclimatic conditions of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic]; Bratislava: Príroda, Slovakia, 1975; p. 270. [Google Scholar]
  19. Šiška, B.; Špánik, F.; Repa, Š.; Gálik, M. Praktická biometeorológia [Practical Biometeorology]; SPU: Nitra, Slovakia, 2005; p. 144. ISBN 80-8069-486-9. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
  20. Global and European Temperatures. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/ims/global-and-european-temperatures (accessed on 19 July 2022).
  21. Satyamurty, P.; de Castro, A.A.; Tota, J.; da Silva Gularte, L.E.; Ocimar Manzi, A. Rainfall trends in the Brazilian Amazon Basin in the past eight decades. Appl Clim. 2010, 99, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pagáč, J.; Pokrývková, J. Climate Change Impact in Agricultural Lands. In Veda mladých 2022-Science of Youth 2022; Kišš, V., Tárník, A., Eds.; Slovak University of Agriculture: Nitra, Slovakia, 2022; pp. 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. How Topo to Raster Works. Available online: https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/3d-analyst/how-topo-to-raster-works.htm (accessed on 27 July 2022).
  24. Hutchinson, M.F. A new procedure for gridding elevation and stream line data with automatic removal of spurious pits. J. Hydrol. 1989, 106, 211–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, Y.; Drake, W. Geographic Information Systems (GIS). In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research; Michalos, A.C., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Maguire, D. ArcGIS: General Purpose GIS Software System. In Encyclopedia of GIS; Shekhar, S., Xiong, H., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wahba, G. Spline Models for Observational Data; CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics; Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1990; p. 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pagáč Mokrá, A.; Pagáč, J.; Muchová, Z.; Petrovič, F. Analysis of Ownership Data from Consolidated Land Threatened by Water Erosion in the Vlára Basin, Slovakia. Sustainability 2021, 13, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pagáč Mokrá, A.; Muchová, Z.; Pagáč, J. Owner’s Opinion on Finished Land Consolidation Projects in Slovakia: Selected Cases. Geod. List. 2020, 3, 297–314. [Google Scholar]
  30. Büttner, G.; Kosztra, B.; Maucha, G.; Pataki, R.; Kleeschulte, S.; Hazeu, G.; Vittek, M.; Schröder, C.; Littkopf, A. CORINE Land Cover Product User Manual (Version 1.0); European Union; European Environment Agency (EEA): Copenhagen, Denmark, 2021; p. 128. [Google Scholar]
  31. Burić, D.; Lukovic, J.; Ducic, V.; Dragojlovic, J.; Doderovic, M. Recent trends in daily temperature extremes over southern Montenegro (1951-2010). Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2014, 14, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Unkašević, M.; Tošić, I. Trends in temperature indices over Serbia: Relationships to large-scale circulation patterns. Int. J. Climatol. 2013, 33, 3152–3161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Popov, T.; Gnjato, S.; Trbić, G. Trends in frost days in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Glas. Srp. Geogr. Drus. 2017, 97, 35–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sar, T.; Avci, S.; Avci, M. Evaluation of the vegetation period according to climate change scenarios: A case study in the inner west Anatolia subregion of Turkey. J. Geogr. 2019, 39, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Olszewski, K.; Żmudzka, E. Variability of the vegetative period in Poland. Misc. Geogr. 2000, 9, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Valšíková-Frey, M.; Čimo, J.; Špánik, F. Zeleninártvo v podmienkach zmeny klímy [Horticulture in the Conditions of Climate Change]. Meteorol. J. 2011, 14, 69–72. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
  37. Špánik, F.; Valšíková-Frey, M.; Čimo, J. Zmena teplotnej zabezpečenosti základných druhov zelenín v podmienkach klimatickej zmeny (Changes of the Temperature Security of Basic Species of Vegetables under Climate Change Conditions). Acta Hortic. Et. Regiotect. 2007, 10, 42–45. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
  38. Čimo, J.; Šinka, K.; Tárník, A.; Aydin, E.; Kišš, V.; Toková, L. Impact of climate change on vegetation period of basic species of vegetables in Slovakia. J. Water Land Dev. 2020, 47, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Consequences of Climate Change. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/climate-change/consequences-climate-change_en (accessed on 9 August 2022).
  40. Hatfield, J.L.; Prueger, J.H. Temperature extremes: Effect on plant growth and development. Weather. Clim. Extrem. 2015, 10, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. USDA. Climate Change and Agriculture in the United States: Effects and Adaptation; USDA Technical Bulletin 1935; USDA: Washington, DC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  42. Climate Smart Agriculture Sourcebook. Available online: https://www.fao.org/climate-smart-agriculture-sourcebook/production-resources/module-b1-crops/chapter-b1-1/en/ (accessed on 9 August 2022).
  43. Ray, R.L.; Fares, A.; Risch, E. Effects of Drought on Crop Production and Cropping Areas in Texas. Agric. Environ. Lett. 2018, 3, 170037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fowler, H.; Ali, H. Chapter 11-Analysis of extreme rainfall events under the climatic change. In Rainfall; Morbidelli, R., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 307–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, X.; Liu, Z.; Chen, H. Investigating Flood Impact on Crop Production under a Comprehensive and Spatially Explicit Risk Evaluation Framework. Agriculture 2022, 12, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Vilček, J.; Koco, Š. Integrated index of agricultural soil quality in Slovakia. J. Maps 2018, 14, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 2. Locality of the meteorological stations.
Figure 2. Locality of the meteorological stations.
Sustainability 14 12220 g002
Figure 3. Number of days in the great vegetation period for the years: (a) 1931–1960; (b) 1961–1990; (c) 1991–2020; (d) 2021–2050—prediction; (e) 2051–2080—prediction; (f) 2081–2110—prediction.
Figure 3. Number of days in the great vegetation period for the years: (a) 1931–1960; (b) 1961–1990; (c) 1991–2020; (d) 2021–2050—prediction; (e) 2051–2080—prediction; (f) 2081–2110—prediction.
Sustainability 14 12220 g003
Figure 4. Number of days in the main vegetation period for the years: (a) 1931–1960; (b) 1961–1990; (c) 1991–2020; (d) 2021–2050—prediction; (e) 2051–2080—prediction; (f) 2081–2110—prediction.
Figure 4. Number of days in the main vegetation period for the years: (a) 1931–1960; (b) 1961–1990; (c) 1991–2020; (d) 2021–2050—prediction; (e) 2051–2080—prediction; (f) 2081–2110—prediction.
Sustainability 14 12220 g004
Figure 5. Number of days in the vegetation summer for years: (a) 1931–1960; (b) 1961–1990; (c) 1991–2020; (d) 2021–2050—prediction; (e) 2051–2080—prediction; (f) 2081–2110—prediction.
Figure 5. Number of days in the vegetation summer for years: (a) 1931–1960; (b) 1961–1990; (c) 1991–2020; (d) 2021–2050—prediction; (e) 2051–2080—prediction; (f) 2081–2110—prediction.
Sustainability 14 12220 g005
Table 1. CORINE Land Cover CLC 2018 parameters [30].
Table 1. CORINE Land Cover CLC 2018 parameters [30].
Satellite DataSentinel-2 and Landsat-8 for gap filling
Time consistency2017–2018
Geometric accuracy, satellite data≤10 m (Sentinel-2)
Min. mapping unit/width25 ha/100 m
Geometric accuracy, CLCbetter than 100 m
Thematic accuracy, CLC≥85%
Change mapping (CHA)boundary displacement min.100 m;
all changes ≥ 5 ha are to be mapped
Thematic accuracy, CHA≥85%
Production time1.5 years
Documentationstandard metadata
Access to the data (CLC, CHA) *free access for all users
Number of countries involved39
Table 2. Average amount of precipitation in spring, summer, autumn, and winter in the periods 1931–1960, 1961–1990, and 1991–2020.
Table 2. Average amount of precipitation in spring, summer, autumn, and winter in the periods 1931–1960, 1961–1990, and 1991–2020.
LocalityPeriodSpring
(III.–V.)
[mm]
Summer
(VI.–VIII.) [mm]
Autumn
(XI.–XI.)
[mm]
Winter
(XII.–II.)
[mm]
Bardejov1931–1960170304183142
1961–1990171282162128
1991–2020151269148107
Bratislava Airport1931–1960144184149138
1961–1990128181131136
1991–2020131182148113
Čadca1931–1960191327192154
1961–1990205338197176
1991–2020214299212170
Hurbanovo1931–1960136177136120
1961–1990122170125108
1991–2020130185151105
Košice Airport1931–196013924615095
1961–199014624214490
1991–202013524814189
Nitra1931–1960134184140113
1961–1990127179131103
1991–2020129178149103
Oravská Lesná1931–1960242395244217
1961–1990242366247240
1991–2020268365278272
Piešťany1931–1960128223144116
1961–1990134196136111
1991–2020129199149100
Poprad1931–196013525713485
1961–199014422613277
1991–202014926514479
Prievidza1931–1960152248156128
1961–1990145223148126
1991–2020147231167133
Rimavská Sobota1931–1960142232153111
1961–1990154202139101
1991–2020156215155111
Myjava1931–1960152238164124
1961–1990151209159152
1991–2020157207169153
Vígľaš-Pstruša1931–1960143212150115
1961–1990145207149105
1991–2020148235157107
Liptovský Hrádok1931–1960154268158100
1961–1990153242158115
1991–2020163266178118
Červený Kláštor1931–1960166331171107
1961–1990171311152114
1991–2020203365183114
Rožňava1931–1960155270160114
1961–1990176242147103
1991–2020161276160105
Moldava and Bodvou1931–1960142243146104
1961–1990158241143101
1991–202014324914694
Trenčín1931–1960143234159134
1961–1990135205144131
1991–2020151215162133
Sliač1931–1960158235169143
1961–1990155226175146
1991–2020161237178139
Liesek1931–1960185323176125
1961–1990180322187162
1991–2020194337197102
Telgárt1931–1960193328206149
1961–1990220301192147
1991–2020221337214126
Plaveč and Popradom1931–196011825512681
1961–199015627612992
1991–2020183326160100
Kamenica and Cirochou1931–1960133253161120
1961–1990168275164117
1991–2020165272182116
Somotor1931–1960125215134103
1961–199013520412397
1991–2020133190148106
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kišš, V.; Pagáč, J.; Tárník, A.; Čimo, J. Changes in Vegetation Period Length in Slovakia under the Conditions of Climate Change for 1931–2110. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12220. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912220

AMA Style

Kišš V, Pagáč J, Tárník A, Čimo J. Changes in Vegetation Period Length in Slovakia under the Conditions of Climate Change for 1931–2110. Sustainability. 2022; 14(19):12220. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912220

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kišš, Vladimír, Jakub Pagáč, Andrej Tárník, and Ján Čimo. 2022. "Changes in Vegetation Period Length in Slovakia under the Conditions of Climate Change for 1931–2110" Sustainability 14, no. 19: 12220. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912220

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop