Next Article in Journal
Stomatal Ratio Showing No Response to Light Intensity in Oryza
Next Article in Special Issue
Antioxidant, Whitening, Antiwrinkle, and Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Ajuga spectabilis Nakai Extract
Previous Article in Journal
Can Peat Amendment of Mars Regolith Simulant Allow Soybean Cultivation in Mars Bioregenerative Life Support Systems?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. Extract Induces Apoptosis-like Programmed Cell Death in Acanthamoeba castellanii Trophozoites
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/plants12010065
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antioxidant and Anti-Skin Aging Potential of Selected Thai Plants: In Vitro Evaluation and In Silico Target Prediction

by
Kamonwan Chaikhong
1,†,
Sawarin Chumpolphant
1,†,
Panthakarn Rangsinth
2,
Chanin Sillapachaiyaporn
1,
Siriporn Chuchawankul
2,
Tewin Tencomnao
3,4,* and
Anchalee Prasansuklab
4,5,*
1
Graduate Program in Clinical Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
2
Department of Transfusion Medicine and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
3
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
4
Natural Products for Neuroprotection and Anti-Ageing Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
5
College of Public Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2023, 12(1), 65; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010065
Submission received: 31 October 2022 / Revised: 17 December 2022 / Accepted: 19 December 2022 / Published: 22 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biological Activities of Plant Extracts II)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The skin is the largest organ that performs a variety of the body’s essential functions. Impairment of skin structure and functions during the aging process might severely impact our health and well-being. Extensive evidence suggests that reactive oxygen species play a fundamental role in skin aging through the activation of the related degradative enzymes. Here, the 16 Thai medicinal plant species were screened for their potential anti-skin aging properties. All extracts were investigated for total phenolic and flavonoid contents, antioxidant, anti-elastase, and anti-tyrosinase activities, as well as the binding ability of compounds with target enzymes by molecular docking. Among all the plants screened, the leaves of A. occidentale and G. zeylanicum exhibited strong antioxidants and inhibition against elastase and tyrosinase. Other potential plants include S. alata leaf and A. catechu fruit, with relatively high anti-elastase and anti-tyrosinase activities, respectively. These results are also consistent with docking studies of compounds derived from these plants. The inhibitory actions were found to be more highly positively correlated with phenolics than flavonoids. Taken together, our findings reveal some Thai plants, along with candidate compounds as natural sources of antioxidants and potent inhibitors of elastase and tyrosinase, could be developed as promising and effective agents for skin aging therapy.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Skin is the largest and most complex organ in the human body. The skin serves as a barrier between the body and the outside environment, and it serves a variety of functions [1]. It has a significant cosmetic role in addition to protecting the body from water loss and microbial infection [2]. In addition, it works to support other body parts, such as the immune, nervous and endocrine systems [1]. The look of youth and beauty may have a positive impact on people’s social behavior and human life [1,2]. Hence, the impairment of skin structure and functions that occur as we age might have a severe impact on our health and well-being [2,3]. Thinness, dryness, lack of elasticity, rough texture, wrinkles, and dark pigments are all common characteristics of older skin [4]. Many researchers are currently working on generating potential anti-aging drugs or chemicals, particularly those derived from natural sources for skin aging treatment.
In general, human skin ages in two ways: internally (as a result of chronological aging) and extrinsically (as a result of environmental variables influenced by environmental factors) [5]. Extensive evidence suggests that oxidative stress, through the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), plays a fundamental role in both intrinsic and extrinsic skin aging [6]. ROS causes oxidative damage to skin cells by damaging essential macromolecules such as nucleic acids, enzymatic proteins, and membrane lipids, resulting in cellular malfunction and cell death [7]. Oxidative stress also contributes to the degradation of the extracellular matrix (ECM) by suppressing ECM component synthesis (e.g., elastin) and activating ECM degrading enzymes (e.g., elastase), which results in loss of skin elasticity [2,8,9]. Moreover, ROS can cause irregular or dark colors in the skin by inducing the production of an α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) in keratinocytes, thereby triggering the activation of the tyrosinase enzyme and promoting melanin synthesis in melanocytes [10,11]. Therefore, scavenging ROS and inhibiting elastase and tyrosinase activities could be useful in the treatment or even prevention of skin aging.
Natural products are currently receiving much interest as potential alternative medicines for treating a number of diseases as well as aging and age-associated declines [8,12,13]. Tropical plants could be of interest to explore their potential in skin aging treatments. As reported previously, several Andean and Himalayan plants have been regarded as sources of compounds with potential use as anti-aging ingredients [14,15]. Thailand is a known place for cultivating a wide variety of tropical plants, many of which have not been studied extensively. The goal of this research was to find potential natural sources for developing novel treatments against skin aging. The extracts of 16 Thai medicinal plant species were studied in vitro for their properties related to anti-skin aging, including total phenolic and flavonoid contents, free radical scavenging, anti-elastase, and anti-tyrosinase activities. We also further performed correlation analysis and an in silico molecular docking approach to reveal the promising phytochemical compounds in the three most effective plants with strong inhibition against elastase or tyrosinase enzyme.

2. Results

2.1. Extraction Yields

Table 1 shows the scientific name, parts used, source, extraction method/solvent, and percent yield of Thai plants used in this study. The percent yields of the extracts ranged from 2.0% to 36.3% (Table 1). C. carandas had the highest extraction yield (36.3%), followed by M. caloneura (18.2%) and A. occidentale (16.0%), whereas H. undatus had the lowest yield (2.0%).

2.2. Total Phenolic Content of Thai Plants

The plant extracts showed a variety of total phenolic content ranging from 14.06 ± 1.55 to 320.14 ± 7.95 mg of gallic acid equivalent (GAE) per g dry weight extract (Table 2). G. zeylanicum (320.14 ± 7.95 mg GAE per g dry weight extract) had the highest phenolic content in all extracts, followed by A. catechu (295.79 ± 11.97 mg GAE per g dry weight extract) and M. caloneura (210.99 ± 10.40 mg of GAE per g dry weight extract), respectively. The lowest level was found in C. carandas at 14.06 ± 1.55 mg GAE per g dry weight extract.

2.3. Total Flavonoid Content of Thai Plants

The total flavonoid content of plant extracts varied among the plant species, ranging from 2.61 ± 0.42 to 84.48 ± 18.32 mg of quercetin equivalent (QE) per g dry weight extract (Table 2). Of all extracts, the highest flavonoid content was found in M. caloneura (84.48 ± 18.32 mg of QE per g dry weight extract), followed by G. zeylanicum (52.54 ± 7.25 mg of QE per g dry weight extract) and P. dulce (28.01 ± 4.39 mg of QE per g dry weight extract), respectively. On the other hand, the lowest level was found in E. americana at 2.61 ± 0.42 mg of QE per g dry weight extract.

2.4. DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity of Thai Plants

The DPPH assay is based on the hydrogen-donating capacity of the compound to scavenge the stable DPPH radicals [16]. The antioxidant capacities of plant extracts were expressed as the percent DPPH radical scavenging activity, the mg of vitamin C equivalent antioxidant capacity (VCEAC) per g dry weight extract, and the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) (Table 3). At 0.1 mg/mL of extracts, the percentages of DPPH scavenging activity ranged from 6.40 to 93.18%. Four plant extracts: G. zeylanicum (93.18%), M. caloneura (90.61%), A. occidentale (89.01%), and A. catechu (88.12%), exhibited DPPH scavenging activity greater than 80%. In contrast, C. ternatea showed the lowest scavenging activity at 6.40%. This rank order was the same when compared based on the relative VCEAC values. However, according to the IC50 values, the antioxidant capacity of the top four plant extracts was changed in the following order: G. zeylanicum > A. catechu > A. occidentale > M. caloneura. The obtained results of the DPPH assay show that G. zeylanicum exhibited the strongest antioxidant potential with the highest percentage of scavenging activity and the lowest IC50 value.

2.5. ABTS Radical Scavenging Activity of Thai Plants

The ABTS assay is based on the compound’s ability to transfer hydrogen atoms for neutralizing a stable ABTS radical cation. The antioxidant capacities of plant extracts were expressed as the percent ABTS radical scavenging activity, the mg of VCEAC per g dry weight extract, and the IC50 (Table 4). At 0.1 mg/mL of extracts, the percentages of ABTS scavenging activity ranged from 13.93% to 99.37%. Eight plant extracts: G. zeylanicum (99.37%), A. catechu (99.31%), A. occidentale (99.23%), M. caloneura (98.88%), E. americana (95.62%), Z. officinale (94.07%), P. dulce (83.99%), and H. undatus (82.16%) exhibited the ABTS scavenging activity greater than 80%. In contrast, C. carandas showed the lowest scavenging activity at 13.93%. The antioxidant capacity of the top four plant extracts, according to the VCEAC, and IC50 values were found in a similar rank order as follows: G. zeylanicum > A. catechu > A. occidentale > M. caloneura. Remarkably, the results of the ABTS assay also showed that the extract with the strongest antioxidant activity was G. zeylanicum leaf, as represented by the highest percentage of scavenging activity and the lowest IC50 value.

2.6. Anti-Elastase Activity of Thai Plants

The elastase inhibitory activity of plant extracts was evaluated using the elastase inhibition assay with N-succinyl-trialanyl-paranitroanilide (SANA) as the substrate. Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) (0.1 mg/mL), which was used as a positive control, showed an inhibition level of 45.27%. The elastase inhibitory activities of the extracts are presented in Table 5 (see also Table S1). At 0.5 mg/mL of extracts, the percentages of elastase inhibition ranged from 1.33% to 88.31%. A. catechu had the highest elastase inhibitory effect at 88.31%, followed by G. zeylanicum (87.43%), A. occidentale (84.78%), and S. alata (73.95%), while S. asper bark had the lowest elastase inhibitory effect at 1.33%. Due to high background absorbance, some plant extracts with no detectable activity were reassayed at 0.1 mg/mL. It was found that M. caloneura, P. nigrum, Z. cassumunar, and S. asper leaf, except Z. officinale, showed low to moderate inhibitory activities ranging from 3.46% to 35.74%. Nevertheless, the effects of C. carandas, C. asiatica, C. ternatea, E. americana, and H. undatus were not observed even at higher concentrations.

2.7. Anti-Tyrosinase Activity of Thai Plants

Tyrosinase inhibitory activity of plant extracts was evaluated using the dopachrome method with 3,4-dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine (L-DOPA) as the substrate. Kojic acid (KA) (0.02 mg/mL), a positive control, showed an inhibition level of 68.35%. The tyrosinase inhibitory activity of the extracts is presented in Table 6 (see also Table S2). At 1 mg/mL of extracts, the percentages of tyrosinase inhibition ranged from 4.80% to 91.51%. G. zeylanicum had the highest tyrosinase inhibitory effect at 91.51%, followed by A. occidentale (81.01%), M. caloneura (76.12%), and A. catechu (75.38%), whereas P. nigrum had the lowest tyrosinase inhibitory effect at 4.80%. Two plant extracts with no detectable activity due to high background absorbance were reassayed at 0.1 mg/mL, and the activities were found at 3.98% (Z. cassumunar) and 21.28% (Z. officinale). However, P. dulce did not exhibit any effect, even at increased concentration.

2.8. Correlation Analysis

Considering several previous reports of potential elastase and tyrosinase inhibitory action of plant extracts [8,16,17], it was likely that the extracts possess a high antioxidant potential and tend to have strong elastase and tyrosinase inhibitory action. Thus to verify those relationships in this study, we further performed Pearson’s correlation analysis to investigate the relationship between the inhibitory activities of both enzymes and the level of antioxidant contents as well as antioxidant capacities among the extracts used. The strength of the correlation is distributed by correlation coefficient (r-value) as follows: r = 0.910 to 1.000 indicate a very strong correlation, r = 0.710 to 0.900 indicate a high correlation, r = 0.410 to 0.700 indicate a moderate correlation, r = 0.210 to 0.400 indicate a small correlation, and r = 0.000 to 0.200 indicate a slight correlation [18]. The elastase inhibition had a high positive correlation to total phenolic content, DPPH, and ABTS radical scavenging activities, as shown in Figure 1a,c,d, respectively. Similarly, the tyrosinase inhibition showed a very strong positive correlation to total phenolic content and ABTS radical scavenging activity (Figure 2a,d), while it showed a high positive correlation to DPPH radical scavenging activity (Figure 2c). However, the total flavonoid content was moderately positively correlated to both elastase and tyrosinase inhibition (Figure 1b and Figure 2b). These results demonstrated that phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity might have a significant contribution to the inhibition of elastase and tyrosinase enzymes.

2.9. Molecular Docking

We next evaluated the abilities of phytochemical compounds in the three most effective plants with strong inhibition against elastase or tyrosinase enzymes. Molecular docking is generally used to predict the binding affinity of compounds to protein receptors or enzymes compared to known inhibitors. According to our results of in vitro screening assays, we found that A. occidentale was the most potent elastase inhibitor, followed by G. zeylanicum and S. alata, in rank order of IC50 values. Thus, we selected phytochemical compounds derived from these three plants to evaluate their ability to inhibit elastase. The results of interactions between elastase (3HGP) and compounds are presented in Table S4 as binding energy, inhibition constant, the number of hydrogen bonds, amino acid interaction, and bond length. The binding energy between 3HGP and compounds shows scores ranging from −2.26 to −11.95 kcal/mol (Table S4). EGCG, a positive control, showed the binding energy at −9.69 kcal/mol. According to the docking results, five compounds showed lower binding energy than the positive control. Tetramer of proanthocyanidin exhibited the lowest binding energy (−11.95 kcal/mol), which indicated that it has the best affinity compared to other compounds in elastase inhibition, followed by amentoflavone, rutin, agathisflavone, and kaempferol 3-O-gentiobioside, with the binding energies at −11.81, −10.12, −9.92, and −9.73, respectively.
In addition, the rank order of IC50 values for plant extracts with tyrosinase inhibition was closely similar to elastase inhibition. We found that G. zeylanicum possessed the highest inhibitory effect, followed by A. catechu, and A. occidentale. Hence, the compounds derived from these three plants were selected to investigate their ability to inhibit tyrosinase. The results of interactions between tyrosinase (2Y9X) and compounds are presented in Table S5 as binding energy, inhibition constant, the number of hydrogen bonds, amino acid interaction, and bond length. The binding energy between 2Y9X and compounds showed scores ranging from −4.56 to −10.42 kcal/mol (Table S5). KA, a well-known inhibitor of tyrosinase, showed the binding energy at −4.59 kcal/mol. Based on the docking results, o-coumaric acid (−10.42 kcal/mol) and tetramer of proanthocyanidin (−10.42 kcal/mol) exhibited the lowest binding energy against elastase when compared to other compounds, followed by caffeic acid, ferulic acid, and arecatannin A1 with the binding energies at −10.10, −10.00, and −9.94, respectively. Figure 3 and Figure 4 represent the 2D diagrams of ligand–protein interactions for elastase and tyrosinase, for the positive control, and for five compounds with the lowest binding energy.

3. Discussion

Skin aging is a naturally occurring process in all human beings. However, many lifestyles and environmental factors can also accelerate this process leading to prematurely aged skin [19]. ROS is well known as an important pathogenic factor in the aging process of the skin. The accumulation of ROS can upregulate the expression of both elastase and tyrosinase enzymes, which subsequently leads to wrinkle formation, lack of elasticity, and hyperpigmentation [20,21,22]. All of these are common characteristics of skin aging [4]. Here, our study investigated the antioxidant, anti-elastase, and anti-tyrosinase properties of plant extracts from 16 Thai plant species and revealed promising natural compounds for the potential development of novel treatments against skin aging.
Elastase is a protease enzyme that is primarily responsible for the degradation of elastin, an important protein found in the ECM. Elastin is vital for giving elasticity to the skin due to its elastic recoil properties [13]. Therefore, the inhibition of elastase activity can be helpful in preventing skin loss of elasticity and wrinkles [23]. Our result found that A. occidentale was the most potent elastase inhibitor, followed by G. zeylanicum and S. alata, in rank order of IC50 values. Furthermore, the docking results revealed that five compounds derived from these three plants have lower binding energies than EGCG (positive control) and FRW (original inhibitor), wherein the compounds displaying the lower binding energy were considered to have better inhibition (Table S4) [24]. Those compounds are flavonoids, which include a tetramer of proanthocyanidin [25], amentoflavone [25], rutin [26,27], agathisflavone [26] from A. occidentale, and kaempferol 3-O-gentiobioside from S. alata [28] (Table S3). The results suggested all five compounds to be responsible for anti-elastase activity as well as can be regarded as promising candidates for the development of anti-skin aging. However, we found that none of the compounds from G. zeylanicum showed strong binding affinity as compared to the control ligands, although its extract showed the second most activity by in vitro assay. This may be due to the synergistic effect of compounds in the mixture rather than the individual effect of each phytochemical component.
In addition to elastase, melanin is considered another important target for skin-aging treatment. Melanin is a major component of the skin, hair, and eye color synthesized by melanogenesis within the melanocyte. However, overproduction of melanin may cause skin disorders, including freckles, melasma, age spots, and hyperpigmentation, leading to a premature aging appearance [12]. In melanogenesis, tyrosinase is the critical enzyme in the rate-limiting step. Therefore, the downregulation of tyrosinase activity can lead to reduced melanin production [29]. Our results showed that G. zeylanicum was the most potent tyrosinase inhibitor, followed by A. catechu and A. occidentale, according to IC50 values. Surprisingly, most of the compounds (47 of 48 compounds) in these three plants showed lower binding energy against tyrosinase than KA (positive control) and tropolone (original inhibitor) (Table S5). Among the 47 compounds, 16 were derived from G. zeylanicum, 12 were derived from A. catechu, and 29 were derived from A. occidentale, of which 10 of them can be found in more than one plant (Table S3). However, in contrast to the binding of the compound with elastase, the identified potential compounds against tyrosinase are from a variety of phytochemical classes. Regarding the rank of binding energies towards tyrosinase, the compounds that are considered the best five inhibitors are o-Coumaric acid [30] (phenolic), tetramer of proanthocyanidin [25] (flavonoid), caffeic acid [30] (phenolic), ferulic acid [30] (phenolic), and arecatannin A1 [31] (tannin), in the increasing order of scores (Table S5). The results obtained from in vitro screening and docking analysis in this study have confirmed the anti-skin-aging properties of four Thai medicinal plants and suggested their potential derived compounds that could be responsible for the observed activities. Further studies on fractionation, as well as the identification and isolation of bioactive compounds in these promising plant extracts, are critically required to prove the presence of our proposed molecules that could subsequently be developed for the treatment of aging skin [14].
A. catechu, A. occidentale, G. zeylanicum, and S. alata are plants used in traditional medicine and found in the tropical zone of Southeast Asia, including Thailand [32,33,34,35,36]. Notably, these plants were demonstrated for several antioxidant-related activities. A. catechu fruit is a popular chewable item with betel leaves, which is intoxicating and slightly addictive [36]. It is used for the treatment of burn wounds and skin ulcers and acts as an astringent [35,37]. It has been reported for potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects against oxidative stress-induced liver injury in rats [38]. A. occidentale and G. zeylanicum, belonging to Southern Thailand, are used as food and local medicinal plant [32,33]. A. occidentale leaves are used to treat skin rashes, itching, ulcers, and fever, whereas G. zeylanicum leaves are used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, influenza, dysentery, and dyspepsia [32,33,39]. The leaf extracts of A. occidentale and G. zeylanicum exhibited neuroprotective effects against glutamate and H2O2-induced oxidative damage [32,40]. Moreover, crude extract from the leaves of both plants exerted antioxidative stress and anti-aging properties in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans [33,41,42]. Leaves of S. alata are used for the treatment of skin rashes, mycosis, and dermatitis [34]. Leaf extract of this plant was able to increase both enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidant systems and prevent the liver and renal tissues from damage caused by oxidative stress during diabetes in a rat model [43].
In agreement with previous reports, our findings reveal that A. catechu, A. occidentale, G. zeylanicum, and S. alata exhibit antioxidant potential, apart from the activities toward skin aging-related enzymes. We found that these plants are rich in total phenolics and flavonoids with high antioxidant capacities towards DPPH and ABTS radicals, except for S. alata, which showed only a moderate level in both amounts and activities. Phenolics and flavonoids are two well-known classes of plant secondary metabolites that are majorly responsible for antioxidant activity [44,45]. This was consistent with our results that total phenolic and flavonoid contents demonstrated a significant positive correlation with free radical scavenging activities (Figure S1). Interestingly, the correlation analysis also revealed that the contents of total phenolic and flavonoid compounds in this studied plant extracts were positively correlated with both elastase and tyrosinase inhibition. However, the correlation strength was found to be higher with phenolics than with flavonoids. Free radical scavenging activities were shown to have a high correlation to the enzyme-inhibitory activities of the extracts. These results suggested that high phenolic content and antioxidant activity may lead to strong inhibition of elastase and tyrosinase enzymes. However, the possibility of protein-polyphenol interactions should also be a concern. Some polyphenols could directly cause enzyme precipitation via their ability to bind with proline-rich proteins, resulting in hydrogen-bond formation with the enzyme and thereby leading to non-selective inhibition [46].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Folin–Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent, aluminum chloride (AlCl3), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), sodium acetate (NaOAc), quercetin, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS), L-ascorbic acid, potassium persulfate (K2S2O8), elastase from porcine pancreas, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), N-succinyl-Ala-Ala-Ala-p-nitroanilide (SANA), tyrosinase from mushroom, kojic acid (KA), and 3,4-dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine (L-DOPA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Gallic acid was purchased from TCI America (Portland, OR, USA). Dipotassium phosphate (K2HPO4) and monobasic potassium phosphate (KH2PO4) were purchased from HiMedia (Mumbai, India). Tris base was purchased from Vivantis Technologies (Shah Alam, Malaysia). Ethanol and methanol were purchased from RCI Labscan (Bangkok, Thailand). All chemicals and reagents were analytical grades.

4.2. Plant Materials and Extraction

The plants in this study were collected locally from gardens or purchased from local markets as appropriate. Table 1 provides the scientific name, part used, and source of each plant. These plants were botanically authenticated, and their voucher specimens were deposited in the herbarium of Kasin Suvatabhandhu, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, or identified by a botanist. The plant materials were washed, dried at 65 °C, and ground finely in a mechanical grinder. The extraction of the dried plant (40 g) was carried out by Soxhlet extraction or maceration method using 400 mL of ethanol or methanol. The extracts were filtered and evaporated to dryness under a vacuum. Then, the dried residues were dissolved in DMSO as a 100 mg/mL stock solution and stored at −20 °C for further study.

4.3. Determination of Total Phenolic Content

The total phenolic content was performed using the Folin–Ciocalteu method [47]. Briefly, 50 µL of extracts at 1 mg/mL in deionized water was mixed with 50 µL of 10% (w/v) Folin–Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent in a 96-well plate and incubated in the dark at room temperature (RT) for 20 min. After the incubation, 50 µL of 7.5% (w/v) Na2CO3 was added to the mixture and incubated for a further 20 min. The absorbance was measured with a microplate reader at 760 nm. The total phenolic content was calculated from a standard calibration curve using gallic acid from 1.56 to 100 µg/mL, and the results are shown as mg of gallic acid equivalent (GAE) per g dry weight extract.

4.4. Determination of Total Flavonoid Content

The total flavonoid content was performed using aluminum chloride (AlCl3) [47]. Briefly, 50 µL of extracts at 1 mg/mL in deionized water was made up to 200 µL with 95% ethanol, and then 10 µL of 10% AlCl3 and 10 µL of 1 M NaOAc were added to a 96-well plate. The plate was incubated in the dark at RT for 40 min, and absorbance was measured with a microplate reader at 415 nm. The total flavonoid content was calculated from a standard calibration curve using quercetin from 1.56 to 100 µg/mL, and the results showed as mg of quercetin equivalent (QE) per g dry weight extract.

4.5. Determination of DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity

DPPH radical scavenging activity assay was performed as described previously [47]. The DPPH• working reagent was prepared by DPPH dissolved in absolute ethanol. Briefly, 180 µL of DPPH• working solution was mixed with 20 µL of extracts in a 96-well plate and was incubated in the dark at RT for 15 min, and absorbance was measured with a microplate reader at 517 nm. Ascorbic acid from 1.56 to 100 μg/mL served as a standard. The radical scavenging activity was calculated as the percent inhibition of free radicals using the following equation:
%   I n h i b i t i o n = ( A b s   o f   c o n t r o l − A b s   o f   s a m p l e ) A b s   o f   c o n t r o l × 100
Percentages of DPPH scavenging activity of each plant extract were compared with those of ascorbic acid. The results were expressed as mg of vitamin C equivalent antioxidant capacity (VCEAC) per g dry weight extract. The IC50 (half-maximal inhibitory concentration) was determined from the graph of percent inhibition against the concentration of each extract.

4.6. Determination of ABTS Radical Scavenging Activity

ABTS radical scavenging activity assay was performed as described previously [47]. The ABTS•+ working reagent was prepared by mixing 7 mM ABTS• and 2.45 mM K2S2O8 at a ratio of 1:1, and the mixture had to remain for 16–18 h in the dark at RT. The ABTS•+ working solution was diluted with absolute ethanol for the absorbance to reach between 0.7 and 0.8 at 734 nm. Briefly, 180 µL of ABTS•+ working solution was mixed with 20 µL of extracts in a 96-well plate and was incubated in the dark at RT for 30 min, and absorbance was measured with a microplate reader at 734 nm. Ascorbic acid from 1.56 to 100 μg/mL served as a standard. The radical scavenging activity was calculated as the percent inhibition of free radicals using the Equation (1).
Percentages of ABTS scavenging activity of each plant extract were compared with those of ascorbic acid. The results expressed as mg of vitamin C equivalent antioxidant capacity (VCEAC) per g dry weight extract. The IC50 was determined from the graph of percent inhibition against the concentration of each extract.

4.7. Determination of Anti-Elastase Activity

The anti-elastase activity was evaluated by the elastase inhibition assay using the modified protocol [13,48,49]. Briefly, 20 µL of extracts, 10 µL of 0.4 U/mL pancreatic porcine elastase (PPE), and 140 µL of 0.1 M Tris-HCL buffer at pH 8.0 were added in 96-well plate and pre-incubated at RT for 20 min. After incubation, 30 µL of 2 mM SANA was added to the reaction mixture and further incubated for 30 min at RT. The absorbance was measured with a microplate reader at 734 nm. EGCG was used to serve as a positive control for inhibition. The negative control contained 100% DMSO instead of the extracts. The percent inhibition of elastase activity was calculated using the equation (1). The IC50 was determined from the graph of percent elastase inhibition against a concentration of each extract.

4.8. Determination of Anti-Tyrosinase Activity

The anti-tyrosinase activity was performed using the dopachrome method with some modifications [8]. Briefly, 20 µL of extracts, 20 µL of 200 U/mL mushroom tyrosinase, and 140 µL of 0.1 M phosphate buffer at pH 6.8 were added in 96-well plates and pre-incubated in RT for 20 min. After incubation, 40 µL of 2.5 mM L-DOPA was added to the reaction mixture and further incubated for 20 min at RT. The absorbance was read with a microplate reader at 492 nm. KA was used to serve as a positive control for inhibition. The negative control contained 100% DMSO instead of the extracts. The percent inhibition of tyrosinase activity was calculated using the equation (1). The IC50 was determined from the graph of percent tyrosinase inhibition against a concentration of each extract.

4.9. Molecular Docking

4.9.1. Ligand Preparation

A list of phytochemical compounds from the three most effective plants with strong inhibition against elastase or tyrosinase was selected from the published literature [25,26,27,28,30,31,32,42,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61] (Table S3). All chemical structures of the compounds were generated from the IUPAC name using BIOVIA Draw 2019 (BIOVIA, San Diego, CA, USA). Then, the compounds were cleaned geometry and saved the file to format pdb using Discovery Studio Visualizer (BIOVIA, San Diego, CA, USA). These files were converted to format pdbqt using AutoDockTools-1.5.6 software (The Scripps Research Institute, San Diego, CA, USA).

4.9.2. Protein Preparation

The X-ray crystallographic structures of elastase (PDB ID: 3HGP) [62] and tyrosinase (PDB ID: 2Y9X) [63] were obtained from RCSB Protein Data Bank. Before the docking study, using Discovery Studio Visualizer, water molecules and the original inhibitor were removed from the protein structure, excluding Cu2+ in structures of tyrosinase. These protein structures were prepared using the prepared protein setup in AutoDockTools-1.5.6 software. All missing hydrogens and Kollman charges were added to the protein structure and saved in the file to format pdbqt for docking study.

4.9.3. Molecular Docking

Molecular docking studies were performed using the default protocol in AutoDockTools-1.5.6 software. Grid sites were set with a spacing of 0.375 Å. The x–y–z dimensions were set to 40 × 40 × 40 points for elastase and 60 × 60 × 60 points for tyrosinase. Grid box of the x, y, and z centers were 12.58, 9.36, and 2.251 for elastase and −10.044, −28.706, and −43.443 for tyrosinase. The docking study was performed using the Lamarckian Genetic Algorithm (GA) with default parameters, and docking results were analyzed using AutoDockTools-1.5.6 software and Discovery Studio Visualizer.

4.10. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed in at least triplicate, and the results were represented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). The IC50 values were analyzed using SigmaPlot version 12.0 software. Correlation between different variables was expressed as Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r). The correlation was determined by using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), and the results were considered statistically significant when p was less than 0.05 (p < 0.05).

5. Conclusions

In summary, our findings revealed four Thai medicinal plants that contain promising candidate compounds for development as anti-skin aging agents. The leaf extracts of A. occidentale and G. zeylanicum demonstrated strong inhibitory action against both elastase and tyrosinase enzymes, whereas the extracts of S. alata leaf and A. catechu fruit exhibited their activity more strongly only towards elastase or tyrosinase, respectively. Several compounds derived from these plants were also confirmed for their abilities to bind to both enzymes through molecular docking study. Moreover, G. zeylanicum leaf, A. occidentale leaf, and A. catechu fruit possess significant antioxidant potential towards free radicals with high amounts of phenolics and flavonoids. Taken together, A. catechu fruit, A. occidentale leaf, G. zeylanicum leaf, and S. alata leaf are identified as natural sources of antioxidants, anti-elastase, and anti-tyrosinase, which are considered potentially useful for the treatment against aging of the skin.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants12010065/s1, Figure S1: correlation analysis between phytochemical contents and antioxidant capacities among the studied plants; Table S1: the percent inhibition of elastase activity by Thai plants at various concentrations; Table S2: the percent inhibition of tyrosinase activity by Thai plants at various concentrations; Table S3: list of compounds derived from three most effective plants on inhibition against elastase and/or tyrosinase; Table S4: molecular docking results between phytochemical compounds and the binding site of elastase (3HGP); Table S5: molecular docking results between phytochemical compounds and the binding site of tyrosinase (2Y9X). References [25,26,27,28,30,31,32,42,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.P.; Investigation and Formal analysis, K.C., S.C. (Sawarin Chumpolphant), P.R., and C.S.; Validation, P.R. and A.P.; Visualization, K.C. and S.C. (Sawarin Chumpolphant); Writing—Original Draft Preparation, K.C., S.C. (Sawarin Chumpolphant), P.R., C.S., and A.P.; Writing—Review and Editing, K.C., S.C. (Sawarin Chumpolphant), P.R., C.S., S.C. (Siriporn Chuchawankul), T.T., and A.P.; Supervision, T.T. and A.P.; Software, S.C. (Siriporn Chuchawankul) and T.T.; Resources, T.T. and A.P.; Funding acquisition, A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the Thailand Science Research and Innovation Fund Chulalongkorn University (CU_FRB65_hea (91)_198_53_01), and the Office of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation (Grant No. RGNS 63-003). K.C. would also like to thank the 90th Anniversary of the Chulalongkorn University Fund (Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Maneewan Suwatronnakorn, Somchai Issaravanich, and Chatrawee Duangjan for their kind help in plant extract preparation. We are also grateful to Nijsiri Ruangrungsi and Chanida Palanuvej for their assistance with plant identification and Dicson Sheeja Malar for their help with the English editing of the manuscript. A.P. is thankful to the Grants for Development of New Faculty Staff, Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund, Chulalongkorn University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kligman, A.M. What is the ‘true’ function of skin? Exp. Dermatol. 2002, 11, 159. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhang, S.; Duan, E. Fighting against skin aging: The way from bench to bedside. Cell Transplant. 2018, 27, 729–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Farage, M.A.; Miller, K.W.; Elsner, P.; Maibach, H.I. Characteristics of the Aging Skin. Adv. Wound Care 2013, 2, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Farage, M.A.; Miller, K.W.; Maibach, H.I. (Eds.) Degenerative Changes in Aging Skin. In Textbook of Aging Skin; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 15–30. [Google Scholar]
  5. Vierkötter, A.; Krutmann, J. Environmental influences on skin aging and ethnic-specific manifestations. Dermatoendocrinology 2012, 4, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Shin, J.-W.; Kwon, S.-H.; Choi, J.-Y.; Na, J.-I.; Huh, C.-H.; Choi, H.-R.; Park, K.-C. Molecular mechanisms of dermal aging and antiaging approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Rinnerhaler, M.; Bischof, J.; Streubel, M.; Trost, A.; Richter, K. Oxidative Stress in Aging Human Skin. Biomolecules 2015, 5, 545–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Chatatikun, M.; Chiabchalard, A. Thai plants with high antioxidant levels, free radical scavenging activity, anti-tyrosinase and anti-collagenase activity. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 17, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Lephart, E.D. Skin aging and oxidative stress: Equol’s anti-aging effects via biochemical and molecular mechanisms. Ageing Res. Rev. 2016, 31, 36–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Peng, H.-Y.; Lin, C.-C.; Wang, H.-Y.; Shih, Y.; Chou, S.-T. The melanogenesis alteration effects of Achillea millefolium L. essential oil and linalyl acetate: Involvement of oxidative stress and the JNK and ERK signaling pathways in melanoma cells. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e95186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Park, J.H.; Ku, H.J.; Lee, J.H.; Park, J.-W. IDH2 deficiency accelerates skin pigmentation in mice via enhancing melanogenesis. Redox Biol. 2018, 17, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jiratchayamaethasakul, C.; Ding, Y.; Hwang, O.; Im, S.-T.; Jang, Y.; Myung, S.-W.; Lee, J.M.; Kim, H.-S.; Ko, S.-C.; Lee, S.-H. In vitro screening of elastase, collagenase, hyaluronidase, and tyrosinase inhibitory and antioxidant activities of 22 halophyte plant extracts for novel cosmeceuticals. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2020, 23, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Thring, T.S.; Hili, P.; Naughton, D.P. Anti-collagenase, anti-elastase and anti-oxidant activities of extracts from 21 plants. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2009, 9, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Bravo, K.; Alzate, F.; Osorio, E. Fruits of selected wild and cultivated Andean plants as sources of potential compounds with antioxidant and anti-aging activity. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 85, 341–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kunwar, R.M.; Shrestha, K.P.; Bussmann, R.W. Traditional herbal medicine in Far-west Nepal: A pharmacological appraisal. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomedicine 2010, 6, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Singh, G.; Passsari, A.K.; Leo, V.V.; Mishra, V.K.; Subbarayan, S.; Singh, B.P.; Kumar, B.; Kumar, S.; Gupta, V.K.; Lalhlenmawia, H. Evaluation of phenolic content variability along with antioxidant, antimicrobial, and cytotoxic potential of selected traditional medicinal plants from India. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Byun, N.-y.; Heo, M.-R.; Yim, S.-H. Correlation of anti-wrinkling and free radical antioxidant activities of Areca nut with phenolic and flavonoid contents. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 41, 1041–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sellar, T.; Arulrajah, A.A.; Lanka, V. The Role of Social Support on Job Burnout in the Apparel Firm. Int. Bus. Res. 2019, 12, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vierkötter, A.; Schikowski, T.; Ranft, U.; Sugiri, D.; Matsui, M.; Krämer, U.; Krutmann, J. Airborne particle exposure and extrinsic skin aging. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2010, 130, 2719–2726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lee, A.-Y. Skin Pigmentation Abnormalities and Their Possible Relationship with Skin Aging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Popoola, O.K.; Marnewick, J.L.; Rautenbach, F.; Ameer, F.; Iwuoha, E.I.; Hussein, A.A. Inhibition of oxidative stress and skin aging-related enzymes by prenylated chalcones and other flavonoids from Helichrysum teretifolium. Molecules 2015, 20, 7143–7155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tu, Y.; Quan, T. Oxidative stress and human skin connective tissue aging. Cosmetics 2016, 3, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Azmi, N.; Hashim, P.; Hashim, D.M.; Halimoon, N.; Majid, N.M.N. Anti–elastase, anti–tyrosinase and matrix metalloproteinase–1 inhibitory activity of earthworm extracts as potential new anti–aging agent. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2014, 4, S348–S352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Rangsinth, P.; Sillapachaiyaporn, C.; Nilkhet, S.; Tencomnao, T.; Ung, A.T.; Chuchawankul, S. Mushroom-derived bioactive compounds potentially serve as the inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 main protease: An in silico approach. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2021, 11, 158–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Konan, N.A.; Bacchi, E.M. Antiulcerogenic effect and acute toxicity of a hydroethanolic extract from the cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) leaves. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 112, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ajileye, O.; Obuotor, E.; Akinkunmi, E.; Aderogba, M. Isolation and characterization of antioxidant and antimicrobial compounds from Anacardium occidentale L.(Anacardiaceae) leaf extract. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2015, 27, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Chotphruethipong, L.; Benjakul, S.; Kijroongrojana, K. Optimization of extraction of antioxidative phenolic compounds from cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) leaves using response surface methodology. J. Food Biochem. 2017, 41, e12379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Moriyama, H.; Iizuka, T.; Nagai, M.; Miyataka, H.; Satoh, T. Antiinflammatory activity of heat-treated Cassia alata leaf extract and its flavonoid glycoside. Yakugaku Zasshi 2003, 123, 607–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Chatatikun, M.; Yamauchi, T.; Yamasaki, K.; Aiba, S.; Chiabchalard, A. Anti melanogenic effect of Croton roxburghii and Croton sublyratus leaves in α-MSH stimulated B16F10 cells. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2019, 9, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, R.; Pan, F.; He, R.; Kuang, F.; Wang, L.; Lin, X. Arecanut (Areca catechu L.) seed extracts extracted by conventional and eco-friendly solvents: Relation between phytochemical compositions and biological activities by multivariate analysis. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2021, 25, 100336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nonaka, G.-i.; Hsu, F.-L.; Nishioka, I. Structures of dimeric, trimeric, and tetrameric procyanidins from Areca catechu L. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1981, 15, 781–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Duangjan, C.; Rangsinth, P.; Zhang, S.; Wink, M.; Tencomnao, T. Anacardium Occidentale, L. Leaf Extracts Protect Against Glutamate/H2O2-Induced Oxidative Toxicity and Induce Neurite Outgrowth: The Involvement of SIRT1/Nrf2 Signaling Pathway and Teneurin 4 Transmembrane Protein. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 627738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Duangjan, C.; Rangsinth, P.; Gu, X.; Zhang, S.; Wink, M.; Tencomnao, T. Glochidion zeylanicum leaf extracts exhibit lifespan extending and oxidative stress resistance properties in Caenorhabditis elegans via DAF-16/FoxO and SKN-1/Nrf-2 signaling pathways. Phytomedicine 2019, 64, 153061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Oladeji, O.S.; Adelowo, F.E.; Oluyori, A.P.; Bankole, D.T. Ethnobotanical description and biological activities of Senna alata. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2020, 2020, 2580259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Peng, W.; Liu, Y.-J.; Wu, N.; Sun, T.; He, X.-Y.; Gao, Y.-X.; Wu, C.-J. Areca catechu L.(Arecaceae): A review of its traditional uses, botany, phytochemistry, pharmacology and toxicology. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 164, 340–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Salehi, B.; Konovalov, D.A.; Fru, P.; Kapewangolo, P.; Peron, G.; Ksenija, M.S.; Cardoso, S.M.; Pereira, O.R.; Nigam, M.; Nicola, S. Areca catechu—From farm to food and biomedical applications. Phytother. Res. 2020, 34, 2140–2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Verma, D.K.; Bharat, M.; Nayak, D.; Shanbhag, T.; Shanbhag, V.; Rajput, R.S. Areca catechu: Effect of topical ethanolic extract on burn wound healing in albino rats. Int. J. Pharmacol. Clin. Sci. 2012, 1, 74–78. [Google Scholar]
  38. Pithayanukul, P.; Nithitanakool, S.; Bavovada, R. Hepatoprotective potential of extracts from seeds of Areca catechu and nutgalls of Quercus infectoria. Molecules 2009, 14, 4987–5000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Salehi, B.; Gültekin-Özgüven, M.; Kirkin, C.; Özçelik, B.; Morais-Braga, M.F.B.; Carneiro, J.N.P.; Bezerra, C.F.; Silva, T.G.d.; Coutinho, H.D.M.; Amina, B. Antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anticancer effects of anacardium plants: An ethnopharmacological perspective. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Duangjan, C.; Rangsinth, P.; Zhang, S.; Gu, X.; Wink, M.; Tencomnao, T. Neuroprotective Effects of Glochidion zeylanicum Leaf Extract against H2O2/Glutamate-Induced Toxicity in Cultured Neuronal Cells and Aβ-Induced Toxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Biology 2021, 10, 800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Duangjan, C.; Rangsinth, P.; Gu, X.; Wink, M.; Tencomnao, T. Lifespan extending and oxidative stress resistance properties of a leaf extracts from Anacardium occidentale L. in Caenorhabditis elegans. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 9012396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Duangjan, C.; Rangsinth, P.; Gu, X.; Zhang, S.; Wink, M.; Tencomnao, T. Data on the effects of Glochidion zeylanicum leaf extracts in Caenorhabditis elegans. Data Brief 2019, 26, 104461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sugumar, M.; Doss, D.V.A.; Maddisetty, P.P. Hepato-renal protective effects of hydroethanolic extract of Senna alata on enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidant systems in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. Integr. Med. Res. 2016, 5, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Aryal, S.; Baniya, M.K.; Danekhu, K.; Kunwar, P.; Gurung, R.; Koirala, N. Total phenolic content, flavonoid content and antioxidant potential of wild vegetables from Western Nepal. Plants 2019, 8, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Panche, A.; Diwan, A.; Chandra, S. Flavonoids: An overview. J. Nutr. Sci. 2016, 5, e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Tazeddinova, D.; Rahman, M.; Hamdan, S.B.; Matin, M.M.; Bin Bakri, M.K.; Rahman, M.M. Plant Based Polyphenol Associations with Protein: A Prospective Review. BioResources 2022, 17, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Prasansuklab, A.; Tencomnao, T. Acanthus ebracteatus leaf extract provides neuronal cell protection against oxidative stress injury induced by glutamate. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 18, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Abhijit, S.; Manjushree, D. Anti-hyaluronidase, anti-elastase activity of Garcinia indica. Int. J. Bot. 2010, 6, 299–303. [Google Scholar]
  49. Widowati, W.; Rani, A.P.; Hamzah, R.A.; Arumwardana, S.; Afifah, E.; Kusuma, H.S.W.; Rihibiha, D.D.; Nufus, H.; Amalia, A. Antioxidant and antiaging assays of Hibiscus sabdariffa extract and its compounds. Nat. Prod. Sci. 2017, 23, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Fernand, V.E.; Dinh, D.T.; Washington, S.J.; Fakayode, S.O.; Losso, J.N.; van Ravenswaay, R.O.; Warner, I.M. Determination of pharmacologically active compounds in root extracts of Cassia alata L. by use of high performance liquid chromatography. Talanta 2008, 74, 896–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Jain, V.; Garg, A.; Parascandola, M.; Chaturvedi, P.; Khariwala, S.S.; Stepanov, I. Analysis of alkaloids in areca nut-containing products by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 1977–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Liu, A.; Xu, L.; Zou, Z.; Yang, S. Studies on chemical constituents from leaves of Cassia alata. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi 2009, 34, 861–863. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. Ming-Yue, W.; Jin-Hui, L.; Jian-Guo, L. Determination of Polyphenols in Areca catechu by HPLC. Nat. Prod. Res. Dev. 2011, 23, 101. [Google Scholar]
  54. Mohammed, A.R.; Ali, A.; Aboul-Enein, S.; Mohamed, F.; Abou, E.; Magdy, M.; Mohammed, A. Phytochemical, cytotoxicity and antioxidant investigation of Cassia alata leaves growing in Egypt. J. Innov. Pharm. Biol. Sci 2017, 4, 97–105. [Google Scholar]
  55. Okpuzor, J.; Ogbunugafor, H.; Kareem, G.; Igwo-Ezikpe, M. In vitro investigation of antioxidant phenolic compounds in extracts of Senna alata. Res. J. Phytochem. 2009, 3, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Pongnimitprasert, N.; Wadkhien, K.; Chinpaisal, C.; Satiraphan, M.; Wetwitayaklung, P. Anti-inflammatory effects of rhein and crude extracts from Cassia alata L. in HaCaT cells. Sci. Eng. Health Stud. 2018, 12, 19–32. [Google Scholar]
  57. Promgool, T.; Pancharoen, O.; Deachathai, S. Antibacterial and antioxidative compounds from Cassia alata Linn. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 2014, 36, 459–463. [Google Scholar]
  58. Singh, B.; Nadkarni, J.R.; Vishwakarma, R.A.; Bharate, S.B.; Nivsarkar, M.; Anandjiwala, S. The hydroalcoholic extract of Cassia alata (Linn.) leaves and its major compound rhein exhibits antiallergic activity via mast cell stabilization and lipoxygenase inhibition. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 141, 469–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wu, Q.; Yang, Y.; Simon, J.E. Qualitative and quantitative HPLC/MS determination of proanthocyanidins in areca nut (Areca catechu). Chem. Biodivers. 2007, 4, 2817–2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, W.-M.; Huang, W.-Y.; Chen, W.-X.; Han, L.; Zhang, H.-D. Optimization of extraction conditions of areca seed polyphenols and evaluation of their antioxidant activities. Molecules 2014, 19, 16416–16427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, X.; Mei, W.; Zeng, Y.; Liu, J. Phenolic constituents from the fruits of Areca catechu and their anti-bacterial activities. J. Trop. Subtrop. Bot. 2009, 17, 74–76. [Google Scholar]
  62. Tamada, T.; Kinoshita, T.; Kurihara, K.; Adachi, M.; Ohhara, T.; Imai, K.; Kuroki, R.; Tada, T. Combined high-resolution neutron and X-ray analysis of inhibited elastase confirms the active-site oxyanion hole but rules against a low-barrier hydrogen bond. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 11033–11040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ismaya, W.T.; Rozeboom, H.J.; Weijn, A.; Mes, J.J.; Fusetti, F.; Wichers, H.J.; Dijkstra, B.W. Crystal structure of Agaricus bisporus mushroom tyrosinase: Identity of the tetramer subunits and interaction with tropolone. Biochemistry 2011, 50, 5477–5486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Plants 12 00065 g001a 550Plants 12 00065 g001b 550
Figure 1. Correlation analysis between elastase inhibition and values in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 were expressed as Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r): (a) elastase inhibition versus total phenolic content; (b) elastase inhibition versus total flavonoid content; (c) elastase inhibition versus DPPH free radical scavenging activity; (d) elastase inhibition versus ABTS free radical scavenging activity.
Figure 1. Correlation analysis between elastase inhibition and values in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 were expressed as Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r): (a) elastase inhibition versus total phenolic content; (b) elastase inhibition versus total flavonoid content; (c) elastase inhibition versus DPPH free radical scavenging activity; (d) elastase inhibition versus ABTS free radical scavenging activity.
Plants 12 00065 g001aPlants 12 00065 g001b
Plants 12 00065 g002 550
Figure 2. Correlation analysis between tyrosinase inhibition and values in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 were expressed as Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r): (a) tyrosinase inhibition versus total phenolic content; (b) tyrosinase inhibition versus total flavonoid content; (c) tyrosinase inhibition versus DPPH free radical scavenging activity; (d) tyrosinase inhibition versus ABTS free radical scavenging activity.
Figure 2. Correlation analysis between tyrosinase inhibition and values in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 were expressed as Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r): (a) tyrosinase inhibition versus total phenolic content; (b) tyrosinase inhibition versus total flavonoid content; (c) tyrosinase inhibition versus DPPH free radical scavenging activity; (d) tyrosinase inhibition versus ABTS free radical scavenging activity.
Plants 12 00065 g002
Plants 12 00065 g003 550
Figure 3. Molecular docking analysis of elastase (3HGP) is represented by the 2D diagrams of interaction between 3HGP and positive control and compounds with the lowest binding energy: (a) epigallocatechin gallate (positive control); (b) agathisflavone; (c) amentoflavone; (d) kaempferol 3-O-gentiobioside; (e) rutin; (f) tetramer of proanthocyanidin.
Figure 3. Molecular docking analysis of elastase (3HGP) is represented by the 2D diagrams of interaction between 3HGP and positive control and compounds with the lowest binding energy: (a) epigallocatechin gallate (positive control); (b) agathisflavone; (c) amentoflavone; (d) kaempferol 3-O-gentiobioside; (e) rutin; (f) tetramer of proanthocyanidin.
Plants 12 00065 g003
Plants 12 00065 g004 550
Figure 4. Molecular docking analysis of tyrosinase (2Y9X) is represented by the 2D diagrams of interaction between 2Y9X and positive control and compounds with the lowest binding energy: (a) KA (positive control); (b) anacardic acid triene; (c) caffeic acid; (d) ferulic acid; (e) o-coumaric acid; (f) tetramer of proanthocyanidin.
Figure 4. Molecular docking analysis of tyrosinase (2Y9X) is represented by the 2D diagrams of interaction between 2Y9X and positive control and compounds with the lowest binding energy: (a) KA (positive control); (b) anacardic acid triene; (c) caffeic acid; (d) ferulic acid; (e) o-coumaric acid; (f) tetramer of proanthocyanidin.
Plants 12 00065 g004
Table
Table 1. Scientific name, parts used, source, and percent yield of Thai plants.
Table 1. Scientific name, parts used, source, and percent yield of Thai plants.
Scientific NamePart UsedSourceVoucher NumberExtraction Method/Solvent%Yield (w/w)
Anacardium occidentale L.LeafSongkhla, Thailand015863 (BCU)Soxhlet/Methanol16.0
Areca catechu L.FruitSurat Thani, Thailand016434 (BCU)Soxhlet/Ethanol10.5
Carissa carandas L.FruitChachoengsao, Thailand016531 (BCU)Soxhlet/Ethanol36.3
Centella asiatica (L.) Urb.LeafBangkok, Thailand016426 (BCU)Maceration/Ethanol4.1
Clitoria macrophylla Wall.FlowerBangkok, Thailand- aSoxhlet/Ethanol11.9
Clitoria ternatea L.FlowerChonburi, Thailand- aSoxhlet/Methanol12.8
Eleutherine americana (Aubl.) Merr.RhizomeUbon Ratchathani, Thailand016530 (BCU)Maceration/Ethanol3.3
Glochidion zeylanicum (Gaertn.) A. Juss.LeafSongkhla, Thailand016061 (BCU)Soxhlet/Methanol11.8
Hylocereus undatus (Haw.) Britt. Rose.PeelNonthaburi, Thailand016446 (BCU)Soxhlet/Ethanol2.0
Mangifera caloneura Kurz.LeafSongkhla, Thailand016445 (BCU)Soxhlet/Ethanol18.2
Piper nigrum L.SeedBangkok, Thailand016428 (BCU)Maceration/Ethanol5.0
Pithecellobium dulce (Roxb.) Benth.PeelChachoengsao, Thailand017139 (BCU)Soxhlet/Ethanol6.4
Senna alata (L.) Roxb.LeafUbon Ratchathani, Thailand016298 (BCU)Maceration/Ethanol10.5
Streblus asper Lour.BarkRayong, Thailand013419(BCU)Maceration/Ethanol2.5
Streblus asper Lour.LeafRayong, Thailand013419(BCU)Maceration/Ethanol4.0
Zingiber cassumunar Roxb.RhizomeRayong, Thailand013701 (BCU)Maceration/Ethanol6.4
Zingiber officinale Roscoe.RhizomeBangkok, Thailand016425 (BCU)Maceration/Ethanol5.2
a = identified by the botanists.
Table
Table 2. Total phenolic and flavonoid contents of Thai plants.
Table 2. Total phenolic and flavonoid contents of Thai plants.
Scientific NamePart UsedTotal Phenolic Content (mg GAE/g Dry Weight Extract)Total Flavonoid Content (mg QE/g Dry Weight Extract)
Anacardium occidentale L. Leaf173.86 ± 4.7525.34 ± 2.88
Areca catechu L. Fruit295.79 ± 11.972.62 ± 0.36
Carissa carandas L. Fruit14.06 ± 1.552.83 ± 0.78
Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. Leaf15.26 ± 0.7611.25 ± 2.87
Clitoria macrophylla Wall. Flower64.85 ± 2.8114.74 ± 2.71
Clitoria ternatea L. Flower25.60 ± 2.1910.33 ± 2.31
Eleutherine americana (Aubl.) Merr. Rhizome73.73 ± 1.872.61 ± 0.42
Glochidion zeylanicum (Gaertn.) A. Juss.Leaf320.14 ± 7.9552.54 ± 7.25
Hylocereus undatus (Haw.) Britt. Rose. Peel70.39 ± 4.5722.20 ± 3.20
Mangifera caloneura Kurz. Leaf210.99 ± 10.4084.48 ± 18.32
Piper nigrum L. Seed47.86 ± 2.273.46 ± 0.70
Pithecellobium dulce (Roxb.) Benth. Peel61.82 ± 0.6128.01 ± 4.39
Senna alata (L.) Roxb. Leaf45.36 ± 1.1510.24 ± 2.52
Streblus asper Lour. Bark18.02 ± 0.302.72 ± 0.89
Streblus asper Lour.Leaf43.58 ± 2.403.30 ± 1.50
Zingiber cassumunar Roxb. Rhizome44.63 ± 0.614.85 ± 0.98
Zingiber officinale Roscoe. Rhizome139.94 ± 2.272.86 ± 0.74
Values show mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent experiments; GAE = gallic acid equivalent; QE = quercetin equivalent.
Table
Table 3. DPPH radical scavenging activity of Thai plants.
Table 3. DPPH radical scavenging activity of Thai plants.
Scientific NamePart UsedDPPH Radical Scavenging
Scavenging Activity (%)mg VCEAC/g Dry Weight ExtractIC50 (µg/mL)
Anacardium occidentale L. Leaf89.01 ± 1.51387.43 ± 13.9718.68 ± 0.59
Areca catechu L. Fruit88.12 ± 5.04627.64 ± 8.949.85 ± 0.91
Carissa carandas L. Fruit12.76 ± 1.1316.63 ± 2.32>100
Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. Leaf15.38 ± 0.9319.52 ± 1.48>100
Clitoria macrophylla Wall. Flower9.01 ± 1.4310.03 ± 1.50>100
Clitoria ternatea L. Flower6.40 ± 0.457.49 ± 0.29>100
Eleutherine americana (Aubl.) Merr. Rhizome45.58 ± 7.1453.49 ± 6.97188.05 ± 43.01
Glochidion zeylanicum (Gaertn.) A. Juss.Leaf93.18 ± 0.641154.54 ± 36.196.56 ± 0.46
Hylocereus undatus (Haw.) Britt. Rose. Peel26.57 ± 2.0333.91 ± 2.07>100
Mangifera caloneura Kurz. Leaf90.61 ± 3.27289.44 ± 10.6820.89 ± 2.27
Piper nigrum L. Seed14.71 ± 1.7218.74 ± 2.78>100
Pithecellobium dulce (Roxb.) Benth. Peel46.84 ± 3.6855.09 ± 2.72120.84 ± 25.33
Senna alata (L.) Roxb. Leaf27.16 ± 4.5633.12 ± 4.28>100
Streblus asper Lour. Bark11.93 ± 2.2613.14 ± 1.76>100
Streblus asper Lour.Leaf28.53 ± 2.6330.94 ± 2.05>100
Zingiber cassumunar Roxb. Rhizome33.37 ± 4.7040.61 ± 4.99253.63 ± 24.05
Zingiber officinale Roscoe. Rhizome71.73 ± 5.2982.22 ± 6.6867.21 ± 13.31
Values show mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent experiments; IC50 is the concentration at which the 50% scavenging activity is observed; VCEAC = Vitamin C equivalent antioxidant capacity.
Table
Table 4. ABTS radical scavenging activity of Thai plants.
Table 4. ABTS radical scavenging activity of Thai plants.
Scientific NamePart UsedABTS Radical Scavenging
Scavenging Activity (%)mg VCEAC/g Dry Weight ExtractIC50 (µg/mL)
Anacardium occidentale L. Leaf99.23 ± 0.29675.44 ± 65.668.64 ± 0.66
Areca catechu L. Fruit99.31 ± 0.32837.47 ± 44.165.14 ± 1.42
Carissa carandas L. Fruit13.93 ± 1.0312.41 ± 1.97>100
Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. Leaf18.86 ± 4.8116.98 ± 4.73324.22 ± 46.00
Clitoria macrophylla Wall. Flower38.27 ± 7.2434.78 ± 5.01>100
Clitoria ternatea L. Flower26.48 ± 2.2426.35 ± 3.28>100
Eleutherine americana (Aubl.) Merr. Rhizome95.62 ± 6.13213.63 ± 9.1220.23 ± 4.72
Glochidion zeylanicum (Gaertn.) A. Juss.Leaf99.37 ± 0.211184.59 ± 51.413.76 ± 0.79
Hylocereus undatus (Haw.) Britt. Rose. Peel82.16 ± 2.1781.73 ± 4.7844.23 ± 5.13
Mangifera caloneura Kurz. Leaf98.88 ± 1.55531.29 ± 26.119.31 ± 0.85
Piper nigrum L. Seed33.28 ± 4.7230.93 ± 4.13150.35 ± 34.82
Pithecellobium dulce (Roxb.) Benth. Peel83.99 ± 6.0179.65 ± 4.3649.52 ± 7.01
Senna alata (L.) Roxb. Leaf64.95 ± 7.3261.92 ± 5.3852.20 ± 2.94
Streblus asper Lour. Bark23.55 ± 2.9223.29 ± 1.33>100
Streblus asper Lour.Leaf65.60 ± 6.4759.33 ± 6.6766.36 ± 7.89
Zingiber cassumunar Roxb. Rhizome73.36 ± 5.8969.88 ± 5.8843.60 ± 5.49
Zingiber officinale Roscoe. Rhizome94.07 ± 3.44175.47 ± 16.2822.76 ± 9.79
Values show mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent experiments; IC50 is the concentration at which the 50% scavenging activity is observed; VCEAC = Vitamin C equivalent antioxidant capacity.
Table
Table 5. Elastase inhibitory activity of Thai plants.
Table 5. Elastase inhibitory activity of Thai plants.
Scientific NamePart UsedElastase Inhibition (%)
0.5 mg/mL0.1 mg/mLIC50 (µg/mL)
Anacardium occidentale L. Leaf84.78 ± 2.16-18.21 ± 4.91
Areca catechu L. Fruit88.31 ± 0.41-117.07 ± 21.71
Carissa carandas L. Fruitnd--
Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. Leafnd--
Clitoria macrophylla Wall. Flower9.85 ± 2.26->500
Clitoria ternatea L. Flowernd--
Eleutherine americana (Aubl.) Merr. Rhizomend--
Glochidion zeylanicum (Gaertn.) A. Juss.Leaf87.43 ± 3.80-47.94 ± 24.75
Hylocereus undatus (Haw.) Britt. Rose. Peelnd--
Mangifera caloneura Kurz. Leafna13.75 ± 1.61>100
Piper nigrum L. Seedna9.05 ± 0.09>100
Pithecellobium dulce (Roxb.) Benth. Peel22.87 ± 2.92->500
Senna alata (L.) Roxb. Leaf73.95 ± 1.46-82.25 ± 19.99
Streblus asper Lour. Bark1.33 ± 0.89-> 500
Streblus asper Lour.Leafna35.74 ± 0.94153.28 ± 2.39
Zingiber cassumunar Roxb. Rhizomena3.46 ± 1.29>100
Zingiber officinale Roscoe. Rhizomenand-
EGCG (0.1 mg/mL) -45.27 ± 3.36-
Values show mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent experiments; IC50 is the concentration at which the 50% inhibition level is observed; EGCG = epigallocatechin gallate; nd = not detectable; na = not applicable (high background); - = not tested.
Table
Table 6. Tyrosinase inhibitory activity of Thai plants.
Table 6. Tyrosinase inhibitory activity of Thai plants.
Scientific NamePart UsedTyrosinase Inhibition (%)
1 mg/mL0.1 mg/mLIC50 (µg/mL)
Anacardium occidentale L. Leaf81.01 ± 2.96-307.66 ± 65.12
Areca catechu L. Fruit75.38 ± 1.57-85.73 ± 8.26
Carissa carandas L. Fruit15.00 ± 1.21->1000
Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. Leaf13.57 ± 1.23->1000
Clitoria macrophylla Wall. Flower27.36 ± 7.95->1000
Clitoria ternatea L. Flower10.02 ± 1.61->1000
Eleutherine americana (Aubl.) Merr. Rhizome45.10 ± 1.59->1000
Glochidion zeylanicum (Gaertn.) A. Juss.Leaf91.51 ± 5.39-76.00 ± 4.31
Hylocereus undatus (Haw.) Britt. Rose. Peel15.79 ± 0.84->1000
Mangifera caloneura Kurz. Leaf76.12 ± 3.98-457.63 ± 71.73
Piper nigrum L. Seed4.80 ± 1.31->1000
Pithecellobium dulce (Roxb.) Benth. Peelnd--
Senna alata (L.) Roxb. Leaf12.94 ± 2.73->1000
Streblus asper Lour. Bark9.85 ± 1.14->1000
Streblus asper Lour.Leaf5.11 ± 3.88->1000
Zingiber cassumunar Roxb. Rhizomena3.98 ± 0.54>100
Zingiber officinale Roscoe. Rhizomena21.28 ± 2.53>100
KA (0.02 mg/mL) -68.35 ± 1.22-
Values show mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent experiments; IC50 is the concentration at which the 50% inhibition level is observed; KA = kojic acid; nd = not detectable; na = not applicable (high background); - = not tested.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chaikhong, K.; Chumpolphant, S.; Rangsinth, P.; Sillapachaiyaporn, C.; Chuchawankul, S.; Tencomnao, T.; Prasansuklab, A. Antioxidant and Anti-Skin Aging Potential of Selected Thai Plants: In Vitro Evaluation and In Silico Target Prediction. Plants 2023, 12, 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010065

AMA Style

Chaikhong K, Chumpolphant S, Rangsinth P, Sillapachaiyaporn C, Chuchawankul S, Tencomnao T, Prasansuklab A. Antioxidant and Anti-Skin Aging Potential of Selected Thai Plants: In Vitro Evaluation and In Silico Target Prediction. Plants. 2023; 12(1):65. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010065

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chaikhong, Kamonwan, Sawarin Chumpolphant, Panthakarn Rangsinth, Chanin Sillapachaiyaporn, Siriporn Chuchawankul, Tewin Tencomnao, and Anchalee Prasansuklab. 2023. "Antioxidant and Anti-Skin Aging Potential of Selected Thai Plants: In Vitro Evaluation and In Silico Target Prediction" Plants 12, no. 1: 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010065

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop