Next Article in Journal
Calligonum polygonoides L. as Novel Source of Bioactive Compounds in Hot Arid Regions: Evaluation of Phytochemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity
Next Article in Special Issue
Understanding Wheat Starch Metabolism in Properties, Environmental Stress Condition, and Molecular Approaches for Value-Added Utilization
Previous Article in Journal
Protocols for Adventitious Regeneration of Amelanchier alnifolia var. cusickii and Lonicera kamtschatica ‘Jugana’
Previous Article in Special Issue
Breeding of High Cooking and Eating Quality in Rice by Marker-Assisted Backcrossing (MABc) Using KASP Markers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/plants10061154
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Identification and Genetic Variations of the Starch Synthase Gene Family in Rice

by
Hongjia Zhang
1,†,
Seong-Gyu Jang
1,†,
San Mar Lar
1,
Ah-Rim Lee
1,
Fang-Yuan Cao
1,
Jeonghwan Seo
1,2 and
Soon-Wook Kwon
1,2,*
1
Department of Plant Bioscience, College of Natural Resources and Life Science, Pusan National University, Miryang 50463, Korea
2
Life and Industry Convergence Research Institute, Pusan National University, Miryang 50463, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to the work.
Plants 2021, 10(6), 1154; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061154
Submission received: 17 May 2021 / Revised: 4 June 2021 / Accepted: 4 June 2021 / Published: 6 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Analysis of Starch Metabolism in Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Starch is a major ingredient in rice, and the amylose content of starch significantly impacts rice quality. OsSS (starch synthase) is a gene family related to the synthesis of amylose and amylopectin, and 10 members have been reported. In the present study, a synteny analysis of a novel family member belonging to the OsSSIV subfamily that contained a starch synthase catalytic domain showed that three segmental duplications and multiple duplications were identified in rice and other species. Expression data showed that the OsSS gene family is involved in diverse expression patterns. The prediction of miRNA targets suggested that OsSS are possibly widely regulated by miRNA functions, with miR156s targeted to OsSSII-3, especially. Haplotype analysis exhibited the relationship between amylose content and diverse genotypes. These results give new insight and a theoretical basis for the improved amylose content and eating quality of rice.

1. Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a staple crop and provides energy for half of the global population [1]. With the economic development and improvement in living standards of the last few decades, consumers have become more concerned about the quality of their food. Important traits associated with quality in rice are nutritional quality, grain appearance, and amylose content [2,3].
Starch is the major carbohydrate in rice grains, of which approximately 18% is amylose and 82% is amylopectin [4]. The ratio of amylose to amylopectin plays an important role in the rice grain structure, appearance, and eating quality. The normal percentage of amylose content in the endosperm of rice is classified as waxy (0–2%), very low (2–10%), low (10–20%), intermediate (20–25%), or high (25–33%) [5,6,7]. Amylose and amylopectin have different branched glucose polymers, each of them connected by α-1-4 glycoside and α-1-6 glycoside [8]. Amylose has a lower molecular weight than amylopectin and a small number of long-chain branches, whereas amylopectin has a large number of short-chain branches [9]. Recent research has reported on the genetics and biochemistry of starch biosynthesis. Starch biosynthesis is controlled by adenosine 5’ diphosphate glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase), which is a key enzyme governing quality in rice [10]. In addition, seed weight and starch content are increased by overexpression of AGPase genes [11].
The synthases for starch biosynthesis have been reported in a previous study [12], including two members of granule bound starch synthase (GBSSI and GBSSII) and four subfamilies of starch synthase (SSI, SSII, SSIII, and SSIV). Each function of GBSSs and SSs in the rice contributes to elongated amylose and amylopectin synthesis [13,14]. Among these, GBSSI, encoded by the waxy gene that regulates the developing seed, is responsible for the biosynthesis and amount of amylose in the rice endosperm [15], whereas GBSSII regulates the biosynthesis of amylose in leaves [16]. The isoforms of SS were also reported to be responsible for the production of amylopectin in the rice endosperm, and relative isoforms were found on the plant tissues. SSI plays the largest role in the total SS activity, accounting for over 60% of this activity in the developing rice endosperm. Furthermore, this gene is expressed anywhere as endosperm and several other cereal tissues [17,18]. SSII-1 and SSIII-2 (SSIIIa) are preferentially expressed in the endosperm, whereas SSII-2, SSII-3, and SSIII-1 (SSIIIb) are mainly expressed in the leaves [19,20].
In the present study, new OsSS members are identified, and the phylogenetic relationships, related expression, miRNA targets, and haplotypes are analyzed, aiming to support the improvement in eating quality in future rice breeding.

2. Results

2.1. Identification of SS Genes in Rice Genome

In order to identify members of SS gene family, the Glyco_transf_5, SS catalytic domain (PFAM accession no. PF08323) was used as the trigger and searched for in the Pfam database, with a filtered E-value set to less than 1E-10. In total, 11 SS genes were identified in the rice genome by HMM software (Table S1); of these, 10 corresponded with the previous study [12]. The gene LOC_Os02g56320, which encodes glycogen synthase 1, was a novel gene showing a significant E-value (3.1E × 10−34) in the present study, which suggests that this gene has functions related to starch development in rice. Additionally, a conserved motifs analysis was performed, and four conserved motifs were identified for all SS genes (Figure 1A–D). Through a comparison by position, motifs 1–3 were identified as components of the starch synthase catalytic domain.
In addition, the physical and chemical characteristics of SS genes were analyzed. The genome length of genes ranged from 4981 bp to 11,263 bp, with an average of 7790 bp; the corresponding length of CDS regions ranged from 1827 bp to 5586 bp, with an average of 2675 bp. The computed isoelectric points of these proteins ranged from 4.96 to 6.26, with an average of 5.75; the molecular mass varied from 58 kDa to 205 kDa and averaged 96 kDa (Table 1). For subcellular localization, each protein was predicted by multiple components and positions (Table 2); among these, six proteins were predicted to be located at the chloroplast, and five proteins were predicted to be located in the cytoplasm.
These results suggested that the starch synthase catalytic domain is a highly conserved domain distributed in SS genes; these acidic nature proteins possible through chloroplast, cytoplasmic, or transferred positions to performed function by protein level.

2.2. Analysis of Phylogenetic Relationship and Gene Structure

The phylogenetic relationship is crucial to understand the structure of the gene family and the evolutionary history of multiple plant species. In this study, we constructed a phylogenetic tree for SS genes by comparing multiple species, including rice, Arabidopsis, barley, and wheat. Six, nine, and twenty-seven SS genes were identified in three species by the HMM model (the same as described above). The results shown in Figure 2 are based on the phylogenetic relationships. Ten SS genes of rice were consistent with the previous study, so their names were kept the same as previously, divided into five subfamilies according to the grouping results. Additionally, novel family member LOC_Os02g56320 was shown to be closest to SSIV-1 and SSIV-2 and, thus, was designated as SSIV-3, belonging to subfamily 4. In other species, at least one family member existed in each subfamily; only one gene family member existed in subfamilies 1, 2, 3, and 5 of Arabidopsis; and the family member number was the same between rice and barley, while wheat showed more family members in each subfamily.
Based on the phylogenetic tree, the domain identification and gene structure of OsSS genes were analyzed (Figure 3A). A total of three domains were identified in 11 members (Figure 3B); among these, all members contained the starch synthase catalytic domain, most contained the glycosyltransferases group 1 domain, and only SSIII-1 and SSIII-2 contained a starch/carbohydrate-binding module. This had a significantly different protein length compared with the others, and only the starch synthase catalytic domain existed in protein SSIV-3. In terms of the gene structure, all of the UTR and CDS structures are as shown in Figure 3C, and each family member contained multiple exons in the genomic DNA region.
These results show that SS genes exist in multiple plant species, and the structure of rice shows a closer relationship with barley, which implies that a similar biofunction exists. All of the family members may be involved in starch development, although there is also contained conservative evolution within each subfamily.

2.3. Synteny Analysis of SS Genes between Rice and Other Species

Synteny analysis, such as tandem duplications and segmental duplications, plays an important role in the evolutionary process of a gene family, which could explain the gene variation among diverse species’ genomes. Only the results of genes with pair ≥ 70% sequence identity were considered tandem or segmental duplications. First, we performed a synteny analysis within the rice genome (Figure 4), and the results showed three pairs of segmental duplications. As expected, all segmental duplications corresponded with the subfamily grouping: subfamily 2, SSII-2 and SSII-3; subfamily 3, SSIII-1 and SSIII-2; subfamily 4, SSIV-1 and SSIV-2; and subfamily 5 did not have a duplication event. In order to describe the type and extent of selective pressure during the process of genome duplication, we analyzed the Ka/Ks ratios of all segmental duplication pairs in OsSS genes. Table 3 shows three gene pairs with Ka/Ks ratios ranging from 0.248 to 0.333, with an average of 0.285, which suggests that these gene pairs are involved in the strong purifying/negative selection pressure during evolution in rice.
Moreover, we analyzed duplication events of SS genes between rice and six prevalent plant species, including Arabidopsis, barley, maize, sorghum, soybeans, and wheat (Tables S2–S6), using the same criteria as above. There was no duplication event between rice and Arabidopsis for SS genes (Figure S1A), while two duplication gene pairs were identified with soybeans (Figure S1E and Table S5), and a total of 9, 14, and 14 duplication gene pairs were identified with barley, maize, and sorghum, respectively (Figure S1B–D and Tables S2–S4). Furthermore, a total of 28 duplication gene pairs was detected between rice and wheat (Figure S1F and Table S6). The Ka/Ks ratios between rice and other species were also calculated, showing ranges of 0.12 to 0.42, 0.12 to 0.34, 0.14 to 0.36, 0.08 to 0.18, and 0.1 to 0.38 for the barley, maize, sorghum, soybean, and wheat genomes, respectively. All of the average Ka/Ks ratios for the six species were less than 0.26, suggesting that all of these homologous gene pairs, consistent with the results of segmental duplications in rice, participated in purifying/negative selection pressure in the evolutionary process.

2.4. Comprehensive Analysis of the Expression Profiles of SS Genes

RNA-seq data from different tissues and growth stages were analyzed for relative expression to understand the expression pattern of OsSS genes. The results are shown in Figure 5. The expression of family members varied between tissues and growth stages, but some genes generated a similar grouping phenomenon or similar expression in one or a few tissues simultaneously. Among these, SSI, SSII-1, SSII-3, SSIII-2, and GBSSI showed the highest expression in the endosperm development stage (EN1–EN3). The expressions of SSIV-2 and SSIV-3 were the highest in EN1 but decreased in EN2–EN3, while SSIII-1, SSIV-1, GBSSI, and GBSSII showed higher or the highest expression in the panicle development stage. Interestingly, SSII-3 and SSIII-2 showed inactive expression in most tissues except in the endosperm development stage. These results suggested that few genes possible are involved in the grouping expression pattern, and they performed distinctive functions in different tissues and growth stages.
Generally, the tandem and segmental duplications showed similar expression patterns that covered the whole growth stage in plants [21]. Due to three pairs of segmental duplications being found in this family (Figure 4), the expression pattern following the growth stage of three gene pairs was compared (Figure S2). The results showed that the expression variation in three gene pairs did not have a similar pattern, but combined with previous results (Figure 5), SSIII-2 and SSII-3 showed similar variation, with increased expression in the flowering stage (Figure S2A,B). This implies that, although SSIII-1 and SSIII-2, SSII-2, and SSII-3 involved segmental duplications, these possibly had different functions in plants, whereas SSII-3 and SSIII-2 possibly had similar functions for starch development.
Moreover, we analyzed other RNA-seq data for a further functional understanding of OsSS genes. The endosperm-specific results in Figure S3A show two subgroups divided due to expression variation in different tissues. SSIV-1, GSBBII, SSII-2, and SSIII-1 had higher expression in the ovaries and embryo (Figure S3A), while other genes showed higher expression in the endosperm during the endosperm development stage. Additionally, the RNA-seq results of starch-related genes mutant were analyzed in the OsbZip58-1 mutant line, and only the expression of GBSSI and SSII-1 showed repressed expression (Figure S3B). In the gif1 mutant line, GBSSII and SSIII-1 were activated by mutation of gif1, while SSII-1 and SSIV-3 showed decreased expression (Figure S3C). These results implied that some SS genes are possibly involved in signaling pathways through interaction with other starch-related proteins, thus performing the function of regulating starch development in rice.

2.5. Prediction of Regulation Network by miRNA-Targeted SS Genes

miRNA has crucial functions in the processes of plant growth, metabolism, signal transduction, etc. We analyzed the potential miRNA targets of 11 SS genes. The results showed 80 unique putative target pairs identified with mature miRNAs of 19–24 nucleotides long by the rice database (Table S7), and all SS family members were identified as containing putative target miRNAs. There were two major regulation networks found (Figure S4), and at least one family member was identified in each subfamily. All members of subfamily 4 contained major miRNA targets. Interestingly, the miRNAs involved in targeting SSII-3 showed 16 target pairs, most (11 of 16) of which belonged to the miRNA156 class, only 5 of 16 pairs belonged to other miRNAs. Additionally, of the 80 target pairs, 68 were shown to regulate cleavage, while only 12 regulated translation. These results implied that the miRNA156-performed starch synthesis-related function might be regulated by SSII-3 and that cleavage function as the major type for miRNA performed this regulation with target genes in the starch-related process.

2.6. Haplotype Analysis for OsSS Genes

In rice, some of the SS genes’ functions have been reported [13,22,23], and diverse haplotypes or alleles that impacted the starch-related index were identified in multiple varieties [24]. In the present study, we also identified novel haplotypes for amylose content using a core collection set. After we removed the heterozygotes and missing data, the SNPs located in the promoter, UTR, exon, and intron region were used for the haplotype and haplotype variation analysis. For analysis of SSI, 12 SNPs were identified in the promoter, intron, and exon regions (Figure 6A), and five Haps were generated by those SNPs (Figure 6B). A boxplot showed an association of five Haps and AC phenotypes (Figure 6C), with different significance levels decided by ANOVA (Duncan test). Among these, Hap 2 contained the lowest AC compared with other Haps, with an average of 20.1%. Hap 1 and Hap 4 contained a moderate level of AC, with averages of 24.5% and 25.2%, respectively. Hap 3 and Hap 5 showed the highest AC in this population, with averages of 26.9% and 27.6%, respectively. Moreover, we analyzed the haplotype variation network between each Hap, which showed that the five Haps were separated roughly into two subgroups (Figure 6D). Hap 2 and Hap 4 possessed mostly Tej and Trj and showed a close relationship; there was only an alteration of one SNP. Hap1, Hap3, and Hap5 possessed mostly Ind and Adm varieties, forming a subgroup with distant genetic relationships with Japonica, though there were alterations of multiple SNPs between each pair of Haps. For analysis of SSIV-2, GBSSI, and GBSSII, there were six Haps generated by 5, 9, and 17 SNPs of diverse regions (Figure S5A,B, Figure S6A,B, Figure S7A,B). Similar to SSI, there were two major groups (Jap and Ind) in GBSSI and GBSSII (Figure S6D and 7C), but in SSIV-2, Hap 4 and Hap 5 were mixed in different varieties (Figure S5C). In terms of associations with phenotype, the lowest and highest Haps were identified, including Hap 2 and Hap 6 of SSIV-2 (Figure S5D), Hap 3 and Hap 6 of GBSSI (Figure S6C), and Hap 6 and Hap 2 of GBSSII (Figure S7D). Interestingly, there was an SNP (–1596 bp) in the promoter region of SSIV-2, which produced a nucleotide mutation from C to T. By comparison, it is possible that a key mutation made a major contribution to AC, as there was a significant difference in two genotypes that possessed AC averages of 20.7 and 26 (Figure S5E). Similarly, a key SNP was found in GBSSII, showing a nucleotide change from T to G at the –800 bp position, which produced phenotype variations from 26.4 to 20.8, a highly significant difference (Figure S7E). Taken together, these haplotypes of SSI, SSIV-2, GBSSI, and GBSSII showed that the functions involved AC in rice and thus impacted starch-related development; these results support the theoretical basis for the preferable selection of rice eating quality.

3. Discussion

In plants, starch-related traits are regulated by multiple gene family members, including ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylases (AGPs), starch branching enzymes (SBEs), starch degradation enzymes (DBEs), and starch synthases (SSs) [24]. A series of starch and metabolic processes are generated by the interactions of these biosynthetic enzymes [25]. Among these, the SS family is involved in the regulation of the structure of amylose and amylopectin [26], the content of each [27], the physical and chemical properties of starch [28], the gelatinization temperature [29], etc., and was critical to starch synthesis and eating quality in rice [30]. A previous study identified 10 SS genes belonging to rice by a BLAST database, divided into five subfamilies according to the phylogenetic relationship [12]. In the present study, we used the PFAM database and HMM model (PF08323), searched the rice genome, and identified 11 genes by their significantly low E-values. The novel family member LOC_Os02g56320, a biosynthetic enzyme as glycogen synthase 1, had an E-value of 3.10 × 10−34 (Table S1), suggesting that its functions might be starch-related. Through a phylogenetic study, we found that this novel member was most closely related to SSIV-1 and SSIV-2 and clustered with subfamily 4 in other species; thus, we named it SSIV-3, a novel member of subfamily 4 in the OsSS gene family (Figure 2). Interestingly, we searched the SS gene family in the Arabidopsis TAIR database and found gene AT4G18240 (named AtSS4 (AtSSIV)) and gene AT5G65685 (named AtSS5), which belong to the SS gene family of Arabidopsis. In our results, SSIV-3 was most closely related to AtSS5, while SSIV-1 and SSIV-2 are closer to AtSS4; thus, SSIV-3 was the novel family member verified by a phylogenetic study between rice and Arabidopsis. Furthermore, we analyzed the gene’s and domain’s structure, which showed that a starch synthase catalytic domain existed in all family members, and a glycosyl transferases group 1 existed in most members except SSIII-2 and SSIV-3. The starch/carbohydrate-binding module only existed in the SSIII subfamily; these results present the new gene SSIV-3 as a member of the OsSS family due to the starch synthase catalytic domain. This domain might be a major domain that performs starch-related functions.
A synteny analysis is important for detecting duplication events during the evolutionary process in diverse species [31]. The Ka/Ks ratio supports a deep understanding of the type and degree of selection pressure between duplications (tandem and segmental) [32]. Therefore, we performed a synteny analysis of the OsSS gene family and compared it with the other six genomes. This showed three segmental and no tandem duplications were found intra rice genome, represented in subfamily SSII, SSIII, SSIV, and possibly contained duplications events. Among these, OsSSII-3 (named ALK) was involved in the regulation of the gelatinization temperature of starch [29], OsSSIII-2 (named flo5 by mutant identification) impacted multiple characteristics of starch [23], and OsSSIV-1 showed no significant function due to a single mutant, but mutation in cooperation with flo5 produced spherical starch granules [13]. In combination with the present study, SSII-2, SSIII-1, and OsSSIV-2 also possibly involved a similar function of duplication homologs. In addition, 0, 9, 14, 14, 2, and 28 duplications were identified between the rice and Arabidopsis, barley, maize, sorghum, soybean, and wheat genomes, respectively. These results suggest a functional differentiation between rice and Arabidopsis SS genes, with wheat as the closest species to compare with the other five genomes. SS genes might be involved in similar functions in starch synthases.
Expression analysis enables researchers to understand gene function at the transcriptional level. With the development of sequencing technology, numerous RNA-seq (transcriptome analysis) results related to starch function have been reported constantly for the integrated analysis of expression variation in the whole genome. In the present study, we used RNA-seq data to gain a deep understanding of the expression mechanisms of the OsSS gene family and found a grouped expression pattern for the whole family. SSI, SSII-1, SSII-3, SSIII-2, and GBSSI showed significantly higher expression in the endosperm development stage, while SSIII-1, SSIV-1, GBSSI, and GBSSII showed higher expression in the panicle and SSIV-2 and SSIV-3 exhibited expression in the earlier stage of endosperm development (Figure 6). In other RNA-seq results, there was also grouping into two groups by the expression patterns in the ovaries, embryo, and endosperm (Figure S3). These results suggest that OsSS genes are possibly involved in a synergy pattern and participate in starch-related signaling pathways in different stages. On the other hand, the regulation pathway of rice starch synthesis has been reported in recent years, with Osbzip58 as a transcription regulator showing interaction and redundancy function with RPBF (rice prolamin box binding factor). It could also interact with the protein OsLOL1, activate the expression of OsKO2, and/or stimulate aleurone programmed cell death through an impact on GA biosynthesis [33,34]. In another study, an OsSSIIa/OsSSIIIa double mutant did not have an additive effect in rice, possibly due to the interaction with amylophosphorylase [22]. In the present study, we checked the expression change in mutant RNA-seq data. In the OsbZip58-1 mutant, SSII-1 and GBSSI decreased in comparison with other SS genes. SSII-1 and SSIV-3 showed a decrease in the gif-1 mutant. These results suggest that SSII-1, GBSSI, and SSIV-3 are possibly involved in starch synthesis by a regulation mechanism. Additionally, miRNA could regulate target genes’ expression by a cleavage and translation model [35]. We also engaged in the prediction of the miRNA regulation network between OsSS genes and the published OsmiRNAs. Two networks were identified, and a miRNA156s-SSII-3-specific pathway was found (Figure S4), with cleavage shown in almost all inhibition functions. These results showed that OsSS genes might be involved in transcription regulation by miRNA target, with cleavage as a major function in miRNA–SS gene target regulation.
Haplotype analysis showed the importance of understanding diverse genotype functions in diverse varieties [36]. In OsSS genes, some gene haplotypes have already been reported, including the positive or negative influence on rice starch-related traits, such as Waxy gene impacts on AC and SSII-3 gene impacts on gelatinization temperature [24]. In the present study, we performed a haplotype analysis of four genes to detect the effects on variations of AC; each significant variation was identified by the phenotype associated with diverse Haps. Especially given the haplotype network results, we could speculate on the origin of haplotype evolutionary relationships. For example, in SSI, Hap 2 contained a small number of SNP variations with Hap 4 (2) and Hap 1 (2) but had a large number of SNP variations with Hap 3 (5) and Hap 5 (9) (Figure 6D). Based on the ingredients of these Haps, we speculated that Jap of Hap 4 and Ind of Hap 1 were derived from Hap 2, and Hap 3 was possibly also derived from Hap 2 but produced large variations. Hap 5 seemed to be derived from Hap 3. Similarly, the presence of major origin Haps could also be speculated for Hap 2 in GBSSI (Figure S6D), and Hap 4 and Hap 5 in GBSSII (Figure S7C), derived other minor Haps. Additionally, the key SNP was found in SSIV-2, where Hap 2, Hap 3, and Hap 4 possessed lower AC compared to other Haps (Figure S5E). As expected, genotype C of Hap 2, Hap 3, and Hap 4 have performed grouping, unlike with T of Hap 1, Hap 5, and Hap 6 (Figure S5B). These results suggest that key SNPs possibly played a decisive role in AC.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Identification of SS Genes in the Rice Genome

For the identified SS family members in rice, the rice reference genome was obtained from the resource database Phytozome (phytozome.jgi.doe.gov), and a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) search was conducted via the HMMER 3.0 program [37], with the objective model Glyco_transf_5 (Pfam accession: PF08323) as a query for the HMM search that was obtained from the Pfam database (http://pfam.xfam.org last accessed on 6 June 2021) [38]. The E-value threshold was set to less than 10-10 for selected candidates, with the candidate domain again searched on the Pfam data for the presence of the Starch synthase catalytic domain after the retrieval. For conserved motif identification, meme software was used for finding a specific motif and positions in SS genes (http://meme-suite.org, last accessed on 6 June 2021) [39]. The following parameters were set: motif length, 6 to 50, zero or one occurrence per sequence (ZOOPS), and a maximum of four motifs. For the analysis of physical and chemical characteristics, all protein sequences were uploaded and analyzed in ExPasy website tools (https://www.expasy.org, last accessed on 6 June 2021). For the predicted subcellular localization of each member, all protein sequences were analyzed by website tools CELLO v.2.5: subCELlular LOcalization predictor [40], through a comparison of the results of prediction for diverse positions. Only the position that contained the maximum value of prediction was decided as the final position.

4.2. Phylogenetic and Structure Analysis of OsSS Genes

For the phylogenetic analysis, a phylogenetic tree of rice and other species was generated. First, the query sequences of Arabidopsis, barley, and wheat were confirmed to be consistent with rice through an HMM model search and download from the Ensembl database (http://ensembl.gramene.org, last accessed on 6 June 2021). Afterward, full protein sequences were uploaded into MEGA-X software for sequence alignment and the generation of a NJ tree by 1000 bootstraps [41]. Finally, a Newick file was uploaded into website tools iTOL (https://itol.embl.de, last accessed on 6 June 2021) for the visualization of the circle tree [42]. For gene structure and domain analysis, the integrative toolkit TBtools was used [43], with the rice reference gff3 file and protein name used to construct the gene structure information. Full protein sequences were uploaded into the Pfam database to identify the conserved domain and positions. Based on the phylogenetic relationship, the visualization mixture of the plot was performed using TBtools.

4.3. Gene Duplication and Synteny Analysis

All query sequences of the other species were obtained from the Ensembl database based on an HMM model search to analyze the duplication events in OsSS genes. The SS genes’ sequences were found by the Blastp function in BLAST software [44]; afterward, all gene pairs were analyzed for synteny by MCScanX software, following the official procedures [45]. Among these, the identity and query coverage were >70% only for the duplicated gene pair, and tandem duplications were decided by the distance between gene pairs, within 100 kb [46]. Visualization of the circle plot using the software Circos was according to the results of MCScanX [47]. The duplicated gene pairs were connected by a solid line. Synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates of duplicated gene pairs were calculated using KaKs Calculater 2.0 software [48]. The mode of selection was identified by the Ka/Ks ratio, with Ka = Ks (Ka/Ks =1), Ka < Ks (Ka/Ks <1), and Ka > Ks (Ka/Ks > 1) representing neutral mutation, negative (purifying) selection, and positive (diversifying) selection, respectively, during the two comparisons.

4.4. Expression Analysis of SS Genes

RNA-seq analysis was used in the present study to analyze the expression pattern of OsSS genes. Total RNA was extracted from the variety Minghui 63 [49] using Trizol according to the manufacturer’s instructions to analyze the expression variation of different stages and tissues. Through a filtering database, the results of SS genes were selected for analysis, and the data were calculated from three replications. For other RNA-seq data, the expression data from rice embryo and endosperm development were used for reference [50,51], and the data were calculated from two replications. Two expression profiles of mutant materials were used to detect the relationships between SS genes and OsbZip58-1 and gif1 [52]. Heat maps were created using TBtools, and a bar plot was plotted by website tools (www.bioinformatics.com.cn, last accessed on 6 June 2021), an online platform for data analysis and visualization.

4.5. Prediction of Regulation Network for miRNA-Target SS Genes

The miRNA database (http://plantgrn.noble.org, last accessed on 6 June 2021) was used for detecting the miRNA target genes of the SS family [53] To analyze the putative regulation network of SS genes. For rice, 713 miRNAs and the cds sequences of SS genes were part of the analysis, and the results were filtered according to those equal to or less than 4.5, with a plot of relationship network created by the software Cytoscape [54].

4.6. Haplotype Analysis for OsSSs

A core collection was used for the present study. The whole panel contained 137 varieties that included subspecies of Temperate and Tropical japonica, Indica, Aus, Aromatic, and Admixture. Information, in the way of high-quality genotype and phenotype data, followed previous reports [55,56]. The haplotype analysis included whole SNP markers from the intragenic and promoter’s region but excluded missing and heterozygote data. The promoter region was set to 2000 bp upstream of the gene initiation site (ATG), and a visualization of the gene structure was produced by website tools Gene Structure Display Server 2.0 (http://gsds.gao-lab.org, last accessed on 6 June 2021) [57]. For the haplotype analysis, the average of the phenotype and varieties number were calculated from the phenotype data of each subspecies. ANOVA analysis and Duncan test were performed by SPSS software after grouping and association, with the plot visualized using boxplot by software Origin. Haplotype variation (Network) was performed by software PopART according to the haplotype analysis results [58].

5. Conclusions

In this study, we re-performed the identification of the OsSS gene family. A novel member, SSIV, was found by the HMM model, potential miRNA targets of OsSS genes were identified, and miR156s seemed to be the major miRNA targeted by OsSSII-3. Diverse haplotypes of OsSS genes showed relationships between genotype variations and starch content. Our results will be helpful for improving the starch-related characteristics and eating quality of rice.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants10061154/s1, Figure S1: Synteny analysis of SSs between rice and other genomes, Figure S2: Expression profiles of duplications across different growth stages, Figure S3: Expression profiles of OsSS genes, Figure S4: Putative miRNA targets of OsSS genes, Figure S5: Haplotype analysis of OsSSIV-2, Figure S6: Haplotype analysis of OsGBSSI, Figure S7: Haplotype analysis of OsGBSSII, Table S1: Motif identification based on PFAM database, Table S2: Synteny analysis for starch synthase gene family between rice and barley genome, Table S3: Synteny analysis for starch synthase gene family between rice and maize genome, Table S4: Synteny analysis for starch synthase gene family between rice and sorghum genome, Table S5: Synteny analysis for starch synthase gene family between rice and soybean genome, Table S6: Synteny analysis for starch synthase gene family between rice and wheat genome, Table S7: Prediction of miRNAs targeted OsSSs identified by psRNATarget online tool.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Z. and S.-W.K.; methodology, H.Z.; formal analysis, H.Z.; investigation, H.Z. and S.M.L.; resources, A.-R.L.; data curation, F.-Y.C.; writing—original draft preparation, H.Z. and S.-G.J.; writing—review and editing, J.S. and S.-W.K.; supervision, S.-W.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Rural Development Administration, grant number PJ01480501.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available in the article and supplementary materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

NJneighbor-joining
Kssynonymous
Kanonsynonymous
SSStarch synthase
GBSSgranule-bound starch synthase
ACamylose content
Haphaplotype
TejTemperate Japonica
TrjTropical Japonica
IndIndica
AdmAdmixture
GAgibberellins

References

  1. Xu, J.; Henry, A.; Sreenivasulu, N. Rice yield formation under high day and night temperatures—A prerequisite to ensure future food security. Plant Cell Environ. 2020, 43, 1595–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, Y.; Wang, M.; Ouwerkerk, P.B. Molecular and environmental factors determining grain quality in rice. Food Energy Secur. 2012, 1, 111–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Patindol, J.; Wang, Y.J. Fine structures of starches from long-grain rice cultivars with different functionality. Cereal Chem. 2002, 79, 465–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Wang, H.; Ham, T.-H.; Im, D.-E.; Lar, S.M.; Jang, S.-G.; Lee, J.; Mo, Y.; Jeung, J.-U.; Kim, S.T.; Kwon, S.-W. A New SNP in Rice Gene Encoding Pyruvate Phosphate Dikinase (PPDK) Associated with Floury Endosperm. Genes 2020, 11, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wani, A.A.; Singh, P.; Shah, M.A.; Schweiggert-Weisz, U.; Gul, K.; Wani, I.A. Rice starch diversity: Effects on structural, morphological, thermal, and physicochemical properties—A review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2012, 11, 417–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wickramasinghe, H.A.M.; Noda, T. Physicochemical properties of starches from Sri Lankan rice varieties. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 2008, 14, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Yang, B.; Xu, S.; Xu, L.; You, H.; Xiang, X. Effects of Wx and its interaction with SSIII-2 on rice eating and cooking qualities. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pijning, T.; Vujičić-Žagar, A.; Kralj, S.; Dijkhuizen, L.; Dijkstra, B.W. Structure of the α-1, 6/α-1, 4-specific glucansucrase GTFA from Lactobacillus reuteri 121. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. F Struct. Biol. Cryst. Commun. 2012, 68, 1448–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Liu, H.; Yu, L.; Xie, F.; Chen, L. Gelatinization of cornstarch with different amylose/amylopectin content. Carbohydr. Polym. 2006, 65, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tang, X.-J.; Peng, C.; Zhang, J.; Cai, Y.; You, X.-M.; Kong, F.; Yan, H.-G.; Wang, G.-X.; Wang, L.; Jin, J. ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase large subunit 2 is essential for storage substance accumulation and subunit interactions in rice endosperm. Plant Sci. 2016, 249, 70–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, N.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, Y.; Li, B.; Zhang, J. Over-expression of AGPase genes enhances seed weight and starch content in transgenic maize. Planta 2011, 233, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hirose, T.; Terao, T. A comprehensive expression analysis of the starch synthase gene family in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Planta 2004, 220, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhou, H.; Wang, L.; Liu, G.; Meng, X.; Jing, Y.; Shu, X.; Kong, X.; Sun, J.; Yu, H.; Smith, S.M. Critical roles of soluble starch synthase SSIIIa and granule-bound starch synthase Waxy in synthesizing resistant starch in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 12844–12849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Prathap, V.; Tyagi, A. Correlation between expression and activity of ADP glucose pyrophosphorylase and starch synthase and their role in starch accumulation during grain filling under drought stress in rice. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 157, 239–243. [Google Scholar]
  15. Su, Y.; Rao, Y.; Hu, S.; Yang, Y.; Gao, Z.; Zhang, G.; Liu, J.; Hu, J.; Yan, M.; Dong, G. Map-based cloning proves qGC-6, a major QTL for gel consistency of japonica/indica cross, responds by Waxy in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2011, 123, 859–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vrinten, P.L.; Nakamura, T. Wheat granule-bound starch synthase I and II are encoded by separate genes that are expressed in different tissues. Plant Physiol. 2000, 122, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Fujita, N.; Yoshida, M.; Asakura, N.; Ohdan, T.; Miyao, A.; Hirochika, H.; Nakamura, Y. Function and characterization of starch synthase I using mutants in rice. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140, 1070–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ohdan, T.; Francisco, P.B., Jr.; Sawada, T.; Hirose, T.; Terao, T.; Satoh, H.; Nakamura, Y. Expression profiling of genes involved in starch synthesis in sink and source organs of rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 3229–3244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Crofts, N.; Sugimoto, K.; Oitome, N.F.; Nakamura, Y.; Fujita, N. Differences in specificity and compensatory functions among three major starch synthases determine the structure of amylopectin in rice endosperm. Plant Mol. Biol. 2017, 94, 399–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lloyd, J.R.; Springer, F.; Buléon, A.; Müller-Röber, B.; Willmitzer, L.; Kossmann, J. The influence of alterations in ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase activities on starch structure and composition in potato tubers. Planta 1999, 209, 230–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pan, G.; Li, Z.; Yin, M.; Huang, S.; Tao, J.; Chen, A.; Li, J.; Tang, H.; Chang, L.; Deng, Y. Genome-wide identification, expression, and sequence analysis of CONSTANS-like gene family in cannabis reveals a potential role in plant flowering time regulation. BMC Plant. Biol. 2021, 21, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, G.; Cheng, Z.; Zhang, X.; Guo, X.; Su, N.; Jiang, L.; Mao, L.; Wan, J. Double repression of soluble starch synthase genes SSIIa and SSIIIa in rice (Oryza sativa L.) uncovers interactive effects on the physicochemical properties of starch. Genome 2011, 54, 448–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ryoo, N.; Yu, C.; Park, C.-S.; Baik, M.-Y.; Park, I.M.; Cho, M.-H.; Bhoo, S.H.; An, G.; Hahn, T.-R.; Jeon, J.-S. Knockout of a starch synthase gene OsSSIIIa/Flo5 causes white-core floury endosperm in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Rep. 2007, 26, 1083–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tian, Z.; Qian, Q.; Liu, Q.; Yan, M.; Liu, X.; Yan, C.; Liu, G.; Gao, Z.; Tang, S.; Zeng, D. Allelic diversities in rice starch biosynthesis lead to a diverse array of rice eating and cooking qualities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 21760–21765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Sun, M.-M.; Abdula, S.E.; Lee, H.-J.; Cho, Y.-C.; Han, L.-Z.; Koh, H.-J.; Cho, Y.-G. Molecular aspect of good eating quality formation in japonica rice. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e18385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Pandey, M.K.; Rani, N.S.; Madhav, M.S.; Sundaram, R.; Varaprasad, G.; Sivaranjani, A.; Bohra, A.; Kumar, G.R.; Kumar, A. Different isoforms of starch-synthesizing enzymes controlling amylose and amylopectin content in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Biotechnol. Adv. 2012, 30, 1697–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Zhu, J.; Yu, W.; Zhang, C.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, J.; Li, E.; Gilbert, R.G.; Liu, Q. New insights into amylose and amylopectin biosynthesis in rice endosperm. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 230, 115656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gonzalez, Z.; Pérez, E. Effect of acetylation on some properties of rice starch. Starch 2002, 54, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gao, Z.; Zeng, D.; Cui, X.; Zhou, Y.; Yan, M.; Huang, D.; Li, J.; Qian, Q. Map-based cloning of the ALK gene, which controls the gelatinization temperature of rice. Sci. China Ser. C Life Sci. 2003, 46, 661–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. He, P.; Li, S.; Qian, Q.; Ma, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, W.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, L. Genetic analysis of rice grain quality. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1999, 98, 502–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Olmstead, J.W.; Sebolt, A.M.; Cabrera, A.; Sooriyapathirana, S.S.; Hammar, S.; Iriarte, G.; Wang, D.; Chen, C.Y.; van der Knaap, E.; Iezzoni, A.F. Construction of an intra-specific sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) genetic linkage map and synteny analysis with the Prunus reference map. Tree Genet. Genomes 2008, 4, 897–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hammoudi, V.; Vlachakis, G.; Schranz, M.E.; van den Burg, H.A. Whole-genome duplications followed by tandem duplications drive diversification of the protein modifier SUMO in Angiosperms. New Phytol. 2016, 211, 172–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Kawakatsu, T.; Yamamoto, M.P.; Touno, S.M.; Yasuda, H.; Takaiwa, F. Compensation and interaction between RISBZ1 and RPBF during grain filling in rice. Plant J. 2009, 59, 908–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wu, J.; Zhu, C.; Pang, J.; Zhang, X.; Yang, C.; Xia, G.; Tian, Y.; He, C. OsLOL1, a C2C2-type zinc finger protein, interacts with OsbZIP58 to promote seed germination through the modulation of gibberellin biosynthesis in Oryza sativa. Plant J. 2014, 80, 1118–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Archak, S.; Nagaraju, J. Computational prediction of rice (Oryza sativa) miRNA targets. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2007, 5, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Garris, A.J.; McCouch, S.R.; Kresovich, S. Population structure and its effect on haplotype diversity and linkage disequilibrium surrounding the xa5 locus of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Genetics 2003, 165, 759–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Finn, R.D.; Clements, J.; Eddy, S.R. HMMER web server: Interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, W29–W37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Mistry, J.; Chuguransky, S.; Williams, L.; Qureshi, M.; Salazar, G.A.; Sonnhammer, E.L.; Tosatto, S.C.; Paladin, L.; Raj, S.; Richardson, L.J. Pfam: The protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D412–D419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bailey, T.L.; Elkan, C. Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in bipolymers. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. 1994, 2, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Yu, C.S.; Chen, Y.C.; Lu, C.H.; Hwang, J.K. Prediction of protein subcellular localization. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 2006, 64, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v4: Recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W256–W259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, Y.; Tang, H.; DeBarry, J.D.; Tan, X.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Lee, T.-h.; Jin, H.; Marler, B.; Guo, H. MCScanX: A toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Cui, L.; Yang, G.; Yan, J.; Pan, Y.; Nie, X. Genome-wide identification, expression profiles and regulatory network of MAPK cascade gene family in barley. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Krzywinski, M.; Schein, J.; Birol, I.; Connors, J.; Gascoyne, R.; Horsman, D.; Jones, S.J.; Marra, M.A. Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1639–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Wang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, J.; Yu, J. KaKs_Calculator 2.0: A toolkit incorporating gamma-series methods and sliding window strategies. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2010, 8, 77–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Zhang, J.; Chen, L.-L.; Xing, F.; Kudrna, D.A.; Yao, W.; Copetti, D.; Mu, T.; Li, W.; Song, J.-M.; Xie, W. Extensive sequence divergence between the reference genomes of two elite indica rice varieties Zhenshan97 and Minghui63. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E5163–E5171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Gao, L.-L.; Xue, H.-W. Global analysis of expression profiles of rice receptor-like kinase genes. Mol. Plant 2012, 5, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Xing, M.-Q.; Zhang, Y.-J.; Zhou, S.-R.; Hu, W.-Y.; Wu, X.-T.; Ye, Y.-J.; Wu, X.-X.; Xiao, Y.-P.; Li, X.; Xue, H.-W. Global analysis reveals the crucial roles of DNA methylation during rice seed development. Plant Physiol. 2015, 168, 1417–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Wang, E.; Wang, J.; Zhu, X.; Hao, W.; Wang, L.; Li, Q.; Zhang, L.; He, W.; Lu, B.; Lin, H. Control of rice grain-filling and yield by a gene with a potential signature of domestication. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40, 1370–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Dai, X.; Zhao, P.X. psRNATarget: A plant small RNA target analysis server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, W155–W159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Shannon, P.; Markiel, A.; Ozier, O.; Baliga, N.S.; Wang, J.T.; Ramage, D.; Amin, N.; Schwikowski, B.; Ideker, T. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2498–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhao, W.-G.; Chung, J.-W.; Kwon, S.-W.; Lee, J.-H.; Ma, K.-H.; Park, Y.-J. Association analysis of physicochemical traits on eating quality in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica 2013, 191, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kim, T.-S.; He, Q.; Kim, K.-W.; Yoon, M.-Y.; Ra, W.-H.; Li, F.P.; Tong, W.; Yu, J.; Oo, W.H.; Choi, B. Genome-wide resequencing of KRICE_CORE reveals their potential for future breeding, as well as functional and evolutionary studies in the post-genomic era. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Hu, B.; Jin, J.; Guo, A.-Y.; Zhang, H.; Luo, J.; Gao, G. GSDS 2.0: An upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 1296–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Leigh, J.W.; Bryant, D. popart: Full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2015, 6, 1110–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 10 01154 g001 550
Figure 1. List of putative motifs of the OsSS gene family. (A) motif 1; (B) motif 2; (C) motif 3; (D) motif 4. The size of letters represents the similarity of amino acids during multiple sequence alignments, while a single letter indicates that the amino acid is completely conserved.
Figure 1. List of putative motifs of the OsSS gene family. (A) motif 1; (B) motif 2; (C) motif 3; (D) motif 4. The size of letters represents the similarity of amino acids during multiple sequence alignments, while a single letter indicates that the amino acid is completely conserved.
Plants 10 01154 g001
Plants 10 01154 g002 550
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of SSs between rice and other species.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of SSs between rice and other species.
Plants 10 01154 g002
Plants 10 01154 g003 550
Figure 3. The OsSS gene family structure based on a phylogenetic tree. (A) Phylogenetic relationship of OsSS; (B) prediction of domain structure; and (C) gene structure. The numbers below A and B represent the length of the amino acid (aa) and target sequence (bp), respectively.
Figure 3. The OsSS gene family structure based on a phylogenetic tree. (A) Phylogenetic relationship of OsSS; (B) prediction of domain structure; and (C) gene structure. The numbers below A and B represent the length of the amino acid (aa) and target sequence (bp), respectively.
Plants 10 01154 g003
Plants 10 01154 g004 550
Figure 4. Synteny analysis of SS genes in the rice genome. Each rice chromosome is displayed in a different color. Duplicated gene pairs are displayed and linked using lines with that color.
Figure 4. Synteny analysis of SS genes in the rice genome. Each rice chromosome is displayed in a different color. Duplicated gene pairs are displayed and linked using lines with that color.
Plants 10 01154 g004
Plants 10 01154 g005 550
Figure 5. Expression profiles of OsSS genes in diverse tissues and across different stages. Expression Data (FPKM) standardization in each line and re-count relative expression from 0 to 1 was performed. GS: germinating seed; PL: plumule; YR: radicle; YS: young seedling; SE: seedling at trefoil stage; TS: shoot under 2 tillers; TR: root under 2 tillers; HL: flag leaf in heading date; HS: stem in heading stage; HP: panicle in heading stage; SP: spikelet; EN1: endosperm seven days after pollination; EN2: endosperm 14 days after pollination; EN3: endosperm 21 days after pollination; ML: flag leaf in mature stage; BL: mature leaf blade under young panicle; BL2: mature leaf blade under mature panicle; BLS: mature leaf sheath under young panicle; BLS2: mature leaf sheath under mature panicle; BP1: developing panicle (length < 1 mm); BP2: developing panicle (3 mm < length < 5 mm); BP3: developing panicle (10 mm < length < 15 mm); BP4: developing panicle (40 mm < length < 50 mm).
Figure 5. Expression profiles of OsSS genes in diverse tissues and across different stages. Expression Data (FPKM) standardization in each line and re-count relative expression from 0 to 1 was performed. GS: germinating seed; PL: plumule; YR: radicle; YS: young seedling; SE: seedling at trefoil stage; TS: shoot under 2 tillers; TR: root under 2 tillers; HL: flag leaf in heading date; HS: stem in heading stage; HP: panicle in heading stage; SP: spikelet; EN1: endosperm seven days after pollination; EN2: endosperm 14 days after pollination; EN3: endosperm 21 days after pollination; ML: flag leaf in mature stage; BL: mature leaf blade under young panicle; BL2: mature leaf blade under mature panicle; BLS: mature leaf sheath under young panicle; BLS2: mature leaf sheath under mature panicle; BP1: developing panicle (length < 1 mm); BP2: developing panicle (3 mm < length < 5 mm); BP3: developing panicle (10 mm < length < 15 mm); BP4: developing panicle (40 mm < length < 50 mm).
Plants 10 01154 g005
Plants 10 01154 g006 550
Figure 6. Haplotype analysis of OsSSI. (A) Structural representation of OsSSI and upstream promoter region. (B) OsSSI SNPs and haplotype groups in 137 rice accessions. SNP positions are given relative to the start of the 5′UTR. Hap: haplotype. (C) Association of phenotype with haplotype. Different letters indicate significant AC differences between haplotypes (ANOVA, Duncan test). (D) Haplotype network variation of OsSSI. The circle size represents the number of accessions in each Hap, and the number of transverse lines between each Hap represents the number of nucleotide variations. Tej: Temperate japonica; Trj: Tropical japonica; Ind: Indica; Aus: Aus; and Adm: Admixture rice varieties.
Figure 6. Haplotype analysis of OsSSI. (A) Structural representation of OsSSI and upstream promoter region. (B) OsSSI SNPs and haplotype groups in 137 rice accessions. SNP positions are given relative to the start of the 5′UTR. Hap: haplotype. (C) Association of phenotype with haplotype. Different letters indicate significant AC differences between haplotypes (ANOVA, Duncan test). (D) Haplotype network variation of OsSSI. The circle size represents the number of accessions in each Hap, and the number of transverse lines between each Hap represents the number of nucleotide variations. Tej: Temperate japonica; Trj: Tropical japonica; Ind: Indica; Aus: Aus; and Adm: Admixture rice varieties.
Plants 10 01154 g006
Table
Table 1. Gene list and information for starch synthase.
Table 1. Gene list and information for starch synthase.
Gene RAP-IDMSU-IDChr.StartEndGene LengthCds LengthPIMW
SSIOs06g0160700LOC_Os06g06560Chr63,079,0593,086,808775019265.7159,234.43
SSII-1Os10g0437600LOC_Os10g30156Chr1015,673,12815,681,124799722505.3978,907.22
SSII-2Os02g0744700LOC_Os02g51070Chr231,232,88831,238,210532320856.0475,623.36
SSII-3Os06g0229800LOC_Os06g12450Chr66,748,3586,753,338498124335.2886,809.55
SSIII-1Os04g0624600LOC_Os04g53310Chr431,750,95531,759,581862736515.42137,944.3
SSIII-2Os08g0191433LOC_Os08g09230Chr85,352,1055,363,3671126355864.96205,368.8
SSIV-1Os01g0720600LOC_Os01g52250Chr130,030,99730,041,4761048029285.93100,337.5
SSIV-2Os05g0533600LOC_Os05g45720Chr526,485,80726,494,112830627486.03104,178.5
SSIV-3Os02g0807100LOC_Os02g56320Chr234,475,93034,483,804787521636.1881,317.8
GBSSIOs06g0133000LOC_Os06g04200Chr61,765,6221,770,656503518306.158,473.21
GBSSIIOs07g0412100LOC_Os07g22930Chr712,916,27712,924,325804918276.2667,354.78
PI: Isoelectric point. MW: Molecular weight.
Table
Table 2. Prediction of subcellular localization in the starch synthase gene family.
Table 2. Prediction of subcellular localization in the starch synthase gene family.
GeneComp. ResultDi-pep. Resultpart-Comp. Resultchemotype. ResultNeighborExtracellularPlasma MembraneCytoplasmicCytoskeletalERGolgiLysosomalMitochondrialChloroplastPeroxisomalVacuoleNuclearPredicted Location
SSIChloroplastLysosomalChloroplastExtracellularChloroplast0.4140.3990.960.0170.1550.0290.8340.5031.2330.3230.0480.085Chloroplast
SSII-1CytoplasmicChloroplastChloroplastChloroplastChloroplast0.2270.0780.7230.0130.0760.0160.2480.7522.5190.2230.0570.069Chloroplast
SSII-2CytoplasmicChloroplastChloroplastChloroplastChloroplast0.0530.0150.5390.010.0710.0110.0180.4413.6280.0870.0810.046Chloroplast
SSII-3CytoplasmicChloroplastChloroplastMitochondrialChloroplast0.1350.1990.870.0320.1190.0560.0370.4682.50.1860.0990.3Chloroplast
SSIII-1CytoplasmicNuclearCytoplasmicNuclearCytoplasmic0.0790.2252.150.0430.0740.0460.0090.2280.4520.0760.0181.6Cytoplasmic
SSIII-2NuclearNuclearCytoplasmicNuclearCytoplasmic0.1490.5231.930.0420.1420.0820.010.10.0780.0560.0241.861Cytoplasmic
SSIV-1CytoplasmicCytoplasmicCytoplasmicNuclearCytoplasmic0.1440.0863.0340.0260.0530.1160.0110.3260.2740.0970.0120.82Cytoplasmic
SSIV-2CytoplasmicCytoplasmicNuclearNuclearCytoplasmic0.110.1132.1090.0660.040.1410.0130.5170.2780.1160.0091.487Cytoplasmic
SSIV-3NuclearCytoplasmicCytoplasmicCytoplasmicCytoplasmic0.3420.2882.1170.0130.0460.0360.070.5670.2290.1420.0141.137Cytoplasmic
GBSSIChloroplastChloroplastChloroplastChloroplastChloroplast0.0220.0390.1880.0040.0060.0030.0120.5584.010.1020.0230.032Chloroplast
GBSSIICytoplasmicChloroplastChloroplastChloroplastChloroplast0.0760.1771.4440.010.0420.0210.0960.252.2920.5190.0290.045Chloroplast
Table
Table 3. Synteny analysis for the starch synthase gene family in the rice genome.
Table 3. Synteny analysis for the starch synthase gene family in the rice genome.
Homologous Genes in Rice GenomeHomologous Genes in Rice GenomeKaKsKa/KsSN
Gene Gene IDChr.StartEndGene Gene IDChr.StartEnd
SSIV-1LOC_Os01g52250Chr13003099730,041,476SSIV-2LOC_Os05g45720Chr526,485,80726,494,1120.193820.781690.24795295.917358.083
SSII-2LOC_Os02g51070Chr23123288831,238,210SSII-3LOC_Os06g12450Chr66,748,3586,753,3380.237310.712590.33303236.083317.917
SSIII-1LOC_Os04g53310Chr43175095531,759,581SSIII-2LOC_Os08g09230Chr85,352,1055,363,3670.237340.863540.27484409.083568.917
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, H.; Jang, S.-G.; Lar, S.M.; Lee, A.-R.; Cao, F.-Y.; Seo, J.; Kwon, S.-W. Genome-Wide Identification and Genetic Variations of the Starch Synthase Gene Family in Rice. Plants 2021, 10, 1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061154

AMA Style

Zhang H, Jang S-G, Lar SM, Lee A-R, Cao F-Y, Seo J, Kwon S-W. Genome-Wide Identification and Genetic Variations of the Starch Synthase Gene Family in Rice. Plants. 2021; 10(6):1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061154

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Hongjia, Seong-Gyu Jang, San Mar Lar, Ah-Rim Lee, Fang-Yuan Cao, Jeonghwan Seo, and Soon-Wook Kwon. 2021. "Genome-Wide Identification and Genetic Variations of the Starch Synthase Gene Family in Rice" Plants 10, no. 6: 1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061154

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop