Next Article in Journal
Nanopatterning of Weak Links in Superconducting Oxide Interfaces
Next Article in Special Issue
Bioconjugation of a PNA Probe to Zinc Oxide Nanowires for Label-Free Sensing
Previous Article in Journal
Smart Nanomaterials for Biomedical Applications—A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Green Synthesis, Characterization, Antimicrobial, Anti-Cancer, and Optimization of Colorimetric Sensing of Hydrogen Peroxide of Algae Extract Capped Silver Nanoparticles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thymine-Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles (Au NPs) for a Highly Sensitive Fiber-Optic Surface Plasmon Resonance Mercury Ion Nanosensor

1
School of Physics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
2
School of Chemical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
H.Y. and G.S. contributed equally.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(2), 397; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11020397
Submission received: 14 January 2021 / Revised: 29 January 2021 / Accepted: 29 January 2021 / Published: 4 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Nanomaterials for Biosensing Applications)

Abstract

:
Mercury ion (Hg2+) is considered to be one of the most toxic heavy metal ions. Once the content of Hg2+ exceeds the quality standard in drinking water, the living environment and health of human beings will be threatened and destroyed. Therefore, the establishment of simple and efficient methods for Hg2+ ion detection has important practical significance. In this paper, we present a highly sensitive and selective fiber-optic surface plasmon resonance (SPR) Hg2+ ion chemical nanosensor by designing thymine (T)-modified gold nanoparticles (Au NPs/T) as the signal amplification tags. Thymine-1-acetic acid (T-COOH) was covalently coupled to the surface of 2-aminoethanethiol (AET)-modified Au NPs and Au film by 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride/N-Hydroxysuccinimide (EDC/NHS) activation effect, respectively. In the presence of Hg2+ ions, the immobilized thymine combines specifically with Hg2+ ions, and forms an Au/thymine-Hg2+-thymine/Au (Au/T-Hg2+-T/Au) complex structure, leading to a shift in SPR wavelength due to the strong electromagnetic couple between Au NPs and Au film. Under optimal conditions, the proposed sensor was found to be highly sensitive to Hg2+ in the range of 80 nM–20 µM and the limit of detection (LOD) for Hg2+ was as low as 9.98 nM. This fiber-optic SPR sensor afforded excellent selectivity for Hg2+ ions against other heavy metal ions such as Fe3+, Cu2+, Ni2+, Ba2+, K+, Na+, Pb2+, Co2+, and Zn2+. In addition, the proposed sensor was successfully applied to Hg2+ assay in real environmental samples with excellent recovery. Accordingly, considering its simple advantages, this novel strategy provides a potential platform for on-site determination of Hg2+ ions by SPR sensor.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Heavy metals are characterized by natural stability, biological toxicity, activity and persistency, non-biodegradation, and bioaccumulation, etc. [1,2,3,4]. Most creatures, including human beings, may be seriously poisoned if they are exposed to or ingest even small amounts of heavy metals [5,6]. Mercury (Hg) is one of the most toxic pollutants among these heavy metals [7,8]. Mercury and its derivatives, as important environmental pollutants, can spread globally via food chains and the atmosphere [9]. They can persistently exist in the environment [5,10]. Due to its acute toxicity, even a small concentration of mercury may greatly threaten animals and human beings in an irreversible way. Severe Hg poisoning may even damage the functions of internal organs of the human body, and cause neuronal destruction, cerebral atrophy, renal dysfunction, and other problems [11,12]. In addition, it is difficult for the human body to excrete mercury through metabolism owing to its accumulation in the body [13]. The World Health Organization (WHO) stipulates that Hg2+ ions in drinking water shall not be higher than 1 ppb [14]. Thus, it is meaningful to detect mercury ions in a fast, accurate, and quantitative way. Currently, atomic emission spectroscopy [15], atomic absorption spectrometry [16], and atomic fluorescence spectrometry [17] are mainly used for mercury ion detection. However, due to the requirement for complex pretreatment and expensive equipment, these analytical methods cannot be used for rapid on-site detection and biological toxicity studies of living organisms. Development of a small and sensitive in-situ detection scheme is urgently needed.
As an alternative and supplement to traditional Hg2+ ion content analysis and detection practice, nanosensors are developing fast due to their good compatibility in analysis and detection. They have the advantages of high sensitivity, high specificity and stability, ease of operation, fast response, and so on [18,19,20]. Among them, the fiber-optic SPR sensor has the features of anti-interference, low cost, and easy integration, and it consumes few samples without the need for labeling. It has been widely used in environmental monitoring, the food industry, clinical medicine, and other fields [21,22,23]. The fiber-optic SPR sensor has already been used for Hg2+ detection: Raj et al. reported using a fiber-optic SPR sensor for Hg2+ ion detection by utilizing an Au NPs–polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) hybrid as a sensing material, however, the limit of detection (LOD) was only down to 1 × 10−6 M [24]. Taking advantage of a chitosan (CS)/polyacrylic acid (PAA) multilayer as the sensitive film, Chen et al. demonstrated that the detection sensitivity of a fiber-optic SPR Hg2+ ion sensor was up to 0.5586 nm/μM [25].
Gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) can be used to improve the sensitivity of nanosensors for small molecule detection [26,27,28,29,30] due to their quantum size effect, small size effect, surface effect, and macro quantum tunneling effect [31,32]. So far, Au NPs have been utilized to detect Hg2+ ions in water and soil samples through different functionalization strategies [33,34]. Au NPs as SPR signal amplification tags are mainly based on the plasmon coupling between the surface plasmons propagating on the fiber-optic SPR probe and the localized surface plasmons (LSP) oscillating around the Au NPs, which performs further signal enhancement [35]. The fiber-optic SPR sensor based on Au NPs can greatly improve its absorption intensity of the spectrum, which has broad application prospects in the field of non-destructive detection of harmful substances [36,37].
Thymine (T), as a nucleobase in nucleic acid, has been proven to be one of the most selective ligands that can specifically bind to Hg2+ ions between two thymine bases [38,39]. Thymine in the form of thymine-1-acetic acid (T-COOH) has been considered as an alternative receptor for detecting Hg2+ ions; a probe is formed by the reaction between the -COOH of thymine-1-acetic acid and the -NH2 [40,41]. Dai et al. prepared thymine-functionalized Ag NPs by T-COOH and AET for Hg2+ determination [42]. In this work, a fiber-optic SPR sensor for Hg2+ ion detection is proposed based on thymine (T)-modified gold nanoparticles (Au NPs/T), which were adopted as the signal amplifying tags to enhance SPR signals. For construction of such tags, thymine-1-acetic acid (T-COOH) was attached on the AET-modified Au NPs’ surface via the condensation reaction by EDC/NHS activization. Meanwhile, the same modification process was also performed on the sensing Au film surface. In the presence of Hg2+, a particular Au/T-Hg2+-T/Au NPs sandwich structure was formed, resulting in a significant shift in the SPR wavelength due to the electromagnetic coupling between Au NPs and Au film. By using this sensing principle, the sensing condition, sensitivity, and selectivity of the proposed fiber-optic SPR sensor were systemically investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC), chloroauric acid (HAuCl4·4H2O), thymine-1-acetic acid (T-COOH), N-Hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), and 2-aminoethanethiol (AET) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai, China). Anhydrous ethanol, acetone, and 2-morpholineethanesulfonic acid (MES) were purchased from Energy Chemical (Shanghai, China). Sodium borohydride, HgCl2, CuCl2·2H2O, KCl, NaCl, PbCl2, NiCl2·6H2O, BaCl2, FeCl3·6H2O, ZnCl2, and CoCl2 were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. (Shanghai, China). All solutions were prepared with ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ·cm) obtained from the Milli-Q purification system.
As shown in Figure 1, the fiber-sensing part was connected with fiber-optic jumpers through two SMA905 connectors. In the detection process, the light source (Ocean Optics, HL-2000, Inc, Dunedin, FL, USA) was used to enter the fiber-optic SPR sensing area through a fiber-optic jumper, and the other end of the fiber-optic jumper was responsible for guiding the reflected light from the sensing area into an SMA fiber input interface of the spectrometer (Ocean Optics, HR4000, Inc). The optical resolution of the spectrometer was 0.25 nm and the spectral range was from 200 to 1200 nm. The SPR signal was imported into the computer through the spectrometer and the signal was analyzed and processed through the Laview program written in our group.
The sensing fiber was a multimode fiber with 400 μm core and its numerical aperture was 0.37. The fiber was cut into 8 cm pieces, and then scraped off the plastic cladding and coating layer located in the middle of the optical fiber, exposing the core part of about 5 mm long. The stripped fiber probes were washed with water, ethanol, and acetone. Subsequently, we deposited 2 nm chromium film and 50 nm Au film on the stripped fiber surface by the magnetron sputter coating apparatus, respectively. For forming AET-functionalized optic fiber, the Au-coated optic fiber was soaked in 10 mM AET solution, and left to stand at 4 °C for 6 h. Then, 0.1 mM T-COOH solution was activated with 10 mM EDC/NHS solution (pH 6.0 MES buffer solution, mixed volume ratio of 1:1), and left to stand for 15 min. The T-modified fiber-optic SPR surface was achieved by immersing the AET-functionalized optic fiber in the carboxyl-activated T-COOH solution for 3 h.
In a typical synthesis procedure of AET-functionalized Au NPs (Au NPs/AET), 290 μL HAuCl4·4H2O (1%) and 170 μL AET (213 mM) were dissolved with 79.71 mL ultrapure water, then we slowly stirred it for 20 min in darkness. Then, 4.2 μL NaBH4 solution (18 mM) was added into the mixture with stirring for 10 h. As shown in Figure 2, for the preparation of thymine-functionalized Au NPs (Au NPs/T), 0.1 mM T-COOH was activated by 10 mM EDC/NHS solution (MES buffer solution, 1 mM, pH 6) for 15 min at 25 °C with constant stirring. After that, 0.3 mL of carboxyl-activated T-COOH was added into 5 mL Au NPs/AET solution with stirring at room temperature for 4 h.
The standard solutions with different concentrations of Hg2+ ions were prepared by successively diluting the stock solution (50 μM). Hg2+ ion solution with different concentrations was passed into the light path for detection, and the spectrometer was used to transfer the collected data to the computer for analysis. For details, a thymine-modified fiber probe was immersed in each Hg2+ ion standard solution (0–20 μM) for 10 min; and then Au NPs-T tags were exposed to the sensing surface with incubation for another 30 min, leading to formation of the specific T–Hg2+–T complexes (Figure 1). The changes in SPR wavelength before and after the introduction of Hg2+ ions were recorded for sensing analysis. The detection of Hg2+ was repeated at least 3 times. Then, 1 mM aqueous solutions of various cations (Fe3+, Cu2+, Ni2+, Ba2+, K+, Na+, Pb2+, Co2+, and Zn2+) were used to test the selectivity of T-COOH-modified fiber-optic sensing system for Hg2+ ions. Tap water was used for demonstration of Hg2+ ion detection in real water samples.

3. Results

The sensing principle of this work was based on using thymine-functionalized Au NPs to enhance the SPR signal for detection of Hg2+ ions. The relatively inexpensive and chemically stable thymine-1-acetic acid was considered as an alternative receptor instead of oligonucleotides [40]. Hg2+ and thymine groups can form stable T-Hg2+-T pairs with strong affinity. If we could design thymine-functionalized Au NPs, Hg2+ could be activated as a bridge to link the neighboring thymine groups (T) for the formation of an Au/T-Hg2+-T/Au NPs sandwich structure (Figure 1). The strong electric field coupling between Au NPs and Au film is believed to be the result of a significant shift in resonance wavelength of the sensing Au film. The Hg2+ ion concentration-dependent wavelength shift of SPR could be utilized for the quantitative analysis of Hg2+ ions.
Next, we considered the construction of thymine-functionalized Au NPs and a sensing surface. AET has an amino group and a mercapto group at both ends of the alkyl chain. According to reports, the Au-S bond has a stronger force than that of the Au-N bond. The attachment of AET on Au NPs’ surface via the formation of an Au-S bond could give amino functionality to Au NPs/AET. Subsequently, amide of Au NPs/AET could react with T-COOH via condensation reaction by EDC/NHS activization, leading to the formation of Au NPs/T. The functionalization process was further characterized by XPS and UV-vis spectroscopy.
Figure 3 shows the XPS spectra with peaks of N1s, S2p, and O1s for Au NPs/AET and Au NPs/T. The peak at 399.4 eV could be related to the N–C groups of 2-aminoethanethiol being adsorbed on Au NPs’ surface (Figure 3a). The S2p zone (Figure 3b) was curve-fitted with doublet 2p1/2 and 2p3/2 signals. These two peaks, located at 161.3 and 162.6 eV, confirmed the presence of thiol groups on Au NPs/AET. For Au NPs/T, the observed XPS peak of O clearly indicated that T-COOH was attached on the surface of Au NPs/AET. Meanwhile, the asymmetric N1s peak (Figure 3d) in the spectrum of Au NPs/T comprised two peaks at 400.9 and 399.2 eV, which were ascribed to C-N and O=C-N bonding, also confirming the formation of a N-C bond via condensation reaction between the COOH group of T-COOH and the NH2 group of AET. It should be noted that optical fiber is constituted of silicon dioxide. For Au NPs/AET, the peak of O1s was located at 531.1 eV, which corresponded to the O atom in Si-O bond (Figure 3f). For Au NPs/T, a new O1s peak was observed at 532.7 eV, which can be ascribed to the O atom in the C-O bond. This result clearly indicates that T-COOH was attached on the surface of Au NPs/AET.
As shown in the UV–vis spectra of Figure 4a, compared with the Au NPs/AET, no obvious change in the location of the UV–vis peak of Au NPs/T was observed (UV–vis peak was 522 nm). This result indicates that the combination of Au NPs’ surface with a functional molecule did not change the stability of Au NPs. The size and morphological structure of functionalized Au NPs were observed with the JEM-2100F transmission electron microscope at 200 kV. According to Figure 4b, the synthesized Au NPs/T were a sphere with a diameter of about 25 nm, which was quite homogeneous. These results indicate the successful preparation of Au NPs/T tags, and more importantly that such tags were near monodispersed, which has great potential for SPR sensing of Hg2+ ions.
In order to clarify the effect of Au NPs/T tags on Hg2+ ions detection, the shift in resonant wavelengths of SPR during the whole detection process is shown in Figure 5. Firstly, Hg2+ standard solution was introduced into the sensing system, and Hg2+ ions were captured through forming the specific T-Hg2+. There was no obvious fluctuation of the SPR resonant wavelength after injecting Hg2+ ions due to the slight changes in the surface refractive index. Then, the nonspecific binding of Hg2+ ions was removed through the injection of water. Finally, Au NPs/T tags were injected into the sensing system; it was found that the SPR resonant wavelength showed a significant shift. Figure 6 shows the field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) image of the optical fiber sensing region before and after exposure to Hg2+ and Au NPs/T tags. As shown in Figure 6b, it distinctly indicates that an Au/T-Hg2+-T/Au sandwich structure was formed in the sensing region. In an Au/T-Hg2+-T/Au structure, the nanoparticle is coupled with Au film like its mirror image, and a strong enhanced electric field is generated between the gold film and the nanoparticle [43]. Accordingly, Au NPs/T tags can enhance the response signal of a fiber-optic SPR sensor for Hg2+ detection. These results clearly verified the reliability of the present SRP Hg2+ ion sensor.
The modification conditions were studied before application of the present sensor for the detection of Hg2+ ions. The concentration of T-COOH will affect the Hg2+ ion sensing performance of thymine-functionalization Au film on the fiber-optic surface. As shown in Figure 7, as we increased the concentration of T-COOH used in the modification process for the AET-modified fiber sensing surface, the resonant wavelength of SPR shifted toward to the long wave direction, and reached a maximum value with the T-COOH concentration of 1 mM. This result indicates that the covalent binding of T and AET approached saturation point. Therefore, 0.1 mM of T-COOH was selected as the best concentration for the functionalization of Au film located on the fiber-optic sensing surface.
In order to find out the optimal ratio of AuNPs/AET solution and T-COOH for the preparation of Au NPs/T tags, we made carboxyl-activated 0.1 mM thymine-1-acetic acid solutions of 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.5 mL; and a hybrid reaction with an AuNPs/AET solution of 5 mL, respectively. The reaction products were used for mercury ion detection. According to the SPR signal, 0.3 mL mixed solution of thymine-1-acetic acid and EDC/NHS showed a maximum SPR resonant wavelength shift after reacting with Au NPs/AET (Figure 8). Therefore, the optimum volume ratio is 3:50. It can be seen that compared with the Au NPs/AET, the location of the ultraviolet absorption peak of Au NPs/T showed no obvious change (Figure 4), which indicated that the combination of Au NPs surface and thymine would not change the stability of Au NPs.
Under optimized conditions for the preparations of signal amplification tags and sensing surface, the quantitative determination of Hg2+ ions was conducted through the SPR signal response. As shown in Figure 9a, the shift in resonance wavelength of SPR increased with the increasing Hg2+ ion concentration. For the sensing process, Hg2+ ions are just like a connection bridge which is first captured by the T on the Au film surface of fiber-optics to produce Hg2+-T complex, and then the captured Hg2+ ions combine with the T modified on the surface of the Au NPs, thus forming a stable Au/T-Hg2+-T/Au NPs sandwich structure, resulting in the shift of the SPR resonance wavelength. Obviously, such a sandwich structure is highly dependent on the concentration of Hg2+ ions. Figure 9b shows the corresponding linear region of Hg2+ ions’ concentration and SPR resonant wavelength; it can be seen that the SPR resonant wavelength and Hg2+ ions’ concentration represented a linear relation in the concentration range of 0~0.2 μM. The correlation coefficient of the linear relation was 0.985 after linear fitting. The LOD of the present sensor for Hg2+ ion detection was calculated to be 9.98 nM (S/N = 3), which is lower than the World Health Organization (WHO) guideline value for Hg2+ ions in drinking water. Table 1 shows the comparison between our proposed sensor and other SPR sensors for Hg2+ detection. It can be seen that the present SPR sensor is comparable to the detection limits obtained by other SPR sensors.
As this was an SPR sensing system, it was necessary to detect its selectivity. There were abundant interfering metal cations in the water samples, such as Fe3+, Cu2+, Ni2+, Ba2+, K+, Na+, Pb2+, Co2+, and Zn2+. For selectivity measurements, the concentrations of Hg2+ ions and each of the other metal cations were 20 and 1 mM, respectively. As expected, the interference from other metal cations was negligible, even when the concentrations of the other metal cations were 50 orders larger than that of Hg2+ ions. This result clearly demonstrates that our proposed sensor has a high selectivity for Hg2+ ion detection (Figure 10). Such high selectivity is due to the special combination between T and Hg2+ ions, which forms a relatively stable Au/T-Hg2+-T/Au complex structure. These results demonstrated that the present SPR sensor possesses a high potential application in environmental pollution detection.
In order to evaluate the practicability of the present fiber-optical SPR sensor for the natural samples, we extracted water samples from our laboratory faucets. The water samples were spiked with standard Hg2+ ions of varying concentrations (80, 100, and 200 nM) to study the recovery of Hg2+ ions in these samples. The experimental findings show that no Hg2+ ion was detected in the samples due to an extra-low concentration of Hg2+ ions in tap water. However, Hg2+ ions could be well detected in the spiked water samples (Table 2). It can be seen that recovery of Hg2+ ions in these samples was in the range of 95%–110%, indicating that the present fiber-optic SPR sensor possesses excellent potential for the detection of Hg2+ ions in real water samples.

4. Conclusions

We have designed thymine-functionalized Au NPs by a simple condensation reaction, which can be used as a single amplification tag for the fiber-optic SPR sensing of Hg2+ ions in aqueous solutions with high sensitivity and selectivity. For the proposed sensor, the resonant wavelength of SPR highly relies on the Hg2+ ions’ concentration-dependent sandwich structure (Au/T-Hg2+-T/Au), because of the electromagnetic coupling between Au NPs and Au film. Our results clearly demonstrated that the present sensor exhibits a specific response to Hg2+ ions. The LOD for Hg2+ ion detection can be down to 9.98 nM, which is much lower than the guideline value of WHO for Hg2+ ions in drinking water. Additionally, the present sensor exhibited an excellent recovery of Hg2+ ion detection in the real water samples. We believe that the present strategy is of much interest for Hg2+ ion analysis of on-site environmental samples.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, and investigation: W.J., and H.Y.; fabrication experiments and data processing: H.Y., G.S., S.C., Q.L., and Y.L.; validation: W.J.; writing—original draft preparation: H.Y. and G.S.; writing—review and editing: H.Y., W.J., and W.P.; project administration: W.J. and W.P.; funding acquisition: W.J. and W.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFCs. 61727816, 22073014, 61520106013). We also acknowledge the support from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DUT18ZD215 and DUT20LK11).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stern, A.H. A review of the studies of the cardiovascular health effects of methylmercury with consideration of their suitability for risk assessment. Environ. Res. 2005, 98, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Uzun, L.; Kara, A.; Osman, B.; Yılmaz, E.; Beşirli, N.; Denizli, A. Removal of heavy-metal ions by magnetic beads containing triazole chelating groups. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 114, 2246–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dai, X.; Nekrassova, O.; Hyde, A.M.E.; Compton, R.G. Anodic Stripping Voltammetry of Arsenic(III) Using Gold Nanoparticle-Modified Electrodes. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 5924–5929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lin, M.; Cho, M.; Choe, W.-S.; Son, Y.; Lee, Y. Electrochemical detection of copper ion using a modified copolythiophene electrode. Electrochim. Acta 2009, 54, 7012–7017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Clarkson, T.W.; Magos, L.; Myers, G.J. The Toxicology of Mercury—Current Exposures and Clinical Manifestations. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 349, 1731–1737. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Laffont, L.; Hezard, T.; Gros, P.; Heimbürger, L.-E.; Sonke, J.E.; Behra, P.; Evrard, D. Mercury(II) trace detection by a gold nanoparticle-modified glassy carbon electrode using square-wave anodic stripping voltammetry including a chloride desorption step. Talanta 2015, 141, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Costas-Mora, I.; Romero, V.; Lavilla, I.; Bendicho, C. In Situ Building of a Nanoprobe Based on Fluorescent Carbon Dots for Methylmercury Detection. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 4536–4543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Holmes, P.; James, K.; Levy, L. Is low-level environmental mercury exposure of concern to human health? Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 408, 171–182. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kobal, A.B.; Horvat, M.; Prezelj, M.; Briški, A.S.; Krsnik, M.; Dizdarevič, T.; Mazej, D.; Falnoga, I.; Stibilj, V.; Arnerič, N.; et al. The impact of long-term past exposure to elemental mercury on antioxidative capacity and lipid peroxidation in mercury miners. J. Trace Elements Med. Biol. 2004, 17, 261–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Valko, M.; Morris, H.; Cronin, M.T.D. Metals, Toxicity and Oxidative Stress. Curr. Med. Chem. 2005, 12, 1161–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Anagnostopoulos, V.A.; Manariotis, I.D.; Karapanagioti, H.K.; Chrysikopoulos, C.V. Removal of mercury from aqueous solutions by malt spent rootlets. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 213, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guha, S.; Lohar, S.; Hauli, I.; Mukhopadhyay, S.K.; Das, D. Vanillin-coumarin hybrid molecule as an efficient fluorescent probe for trace level determination of Hg(II) and its application in cell imaging. Talanta 2011, 85, 1658–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, D.; Wieckowska, A.; Willner, I. Optical Analysis of Hg2+ Ions by Oligonucleotide–Gold-Nanoparticle Hybrids and DNA-Based Machines. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2008, 120, 3991–3995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Du, Z.-Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, C.; Li, L.; Man, Q.; Lundebye, A.-K.; Frøyland, L. Risk–benefit evaluation of fish from Chinese markets: Nutrients and contaminants in 24 fish species from five big cities and related assessment for human health. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 416, 187–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yuan, X.; Li, K.; Zhang, Y.; Miao, Y.; Xiang, Y.; Sha, Y.; Zhang, M.; Huang, K. Point discharge microplasma for the determination of mercury in Traditional Chinese Medicines by chemical vapor generation atomic emission spectrometry. Microchem. J. 2020, 155, 104695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. He, C.; Cheng, G.; Zheng, C.; Wu, L.; Lee, Y.-I.; Hou, X. Photochemical vapor generation and in situ preconcentration for determination of mercury by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Anal. Methods 2015, 7, 3015–3021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shi, M.-T.; Yang, X.-A.; Zhang, W.-B. Magnetic graphitic carbon nitride nano-composite for ultrasound-assisted dispersive micro-solid-phase extraction of Hg(II) prior to quantitation by atomic fluorescence spectroscopy. Anal. Chim. Acta 2019, 1074, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zeng, R.J.; Zhang, L.J.; Su, L.S.; Luo, Z.B.; Zhou, Q.; Tang, D.P. Photoelectrochemical bioanalysis of antibiotics on rGO-Bi2WO6-Au based on branched hybridization chain reaction. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 133, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Srinivasan, R.; Umesh, S.; Murali, S.; Asokan, S.; Gorthi, S.S. Bare fiber Bragg grating immunosensor for real-time detection of Escherichia coli bacteria. J. Biophoton. 2017, 10, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ji, W.; Li, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Ozaki, Y. Recent advances in surface-enhanced Raman scattering-based sensors for the detection of inorganic ions: Sensing mechanism and beyond. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, Q.; Jing, J.-Y.; Wang, B.-T. Highly Sensitive SPR Biosensor Based on Graphene Oxide and Staphylococcal Protein A Co-Modified TFBG for Human IgG Detection. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2019, 68, 3350–3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, C.; Yang, L.; Lu, X.; Liu, Q.; Wang, F.; Lv, J.; Sun, T.; Mu, H.; Chu, P.K. Mid-infrared surface plasmon resonance sensor based on photonic crystal fibers. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 14227–14237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Monfared, Y.E. Refractive Index Sensor Based on Surface Plasmon Resonance Excitation in a D-Shaped Photonic Crystal Fiber Coated by Titanium Nitride. Plasmonics 2019, 15, 535–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Raj, D.R.; Prasanth, S.; Vineeshkumar, T.; Sudarsanakumar, C. Surface Plasmon Resonance based fiber optic sensor for mercury detection using gold nanoparticles PVA hybrid. Opt. Commun. 2016, 367, 102–107. [Google Scholar]
  25. Chen, Z.; Han, K.; Zhang, Y.-N. Reflective Fiber Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor for High-Sensitive Mercury Ion Detection. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Sadani, K.; Nag, P.; Mukherji, S. LSPR based optical fiber sensor with chitosan capped gold nanoparticles on BSA for trace detection of Hg (II) in water, soil and food samples. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 134, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kong, M.-R.; Zhang, B.-X.; Zhang, L.-L.; Jin, Y.-X.; Huan, Y.-S.; Shen, L.-G.; Yu, Q.-R. An ultrasensitive electrochemical “turn-on” label-free biosensor for Hg2+ with AuNP-functionalized reporter DNA as a signal amplifier. Chem. Commun. 2009, 37, 5633–5635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yuan, H.; Ji, W.; Chu, S.; Liu, Q.; Qian, S.; Guang, J.; Wang, J.; Han, X.; Masson, J.-F.; Peng, W. Mercaptopyridine-Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles for Fiber-Optic Surface Plasmon Resonance Hg2+ Sensing. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 704–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Qian, S.; Lin, M.; Ji, W.; Yuan, H.; Zhang, Y.; Jing, Z.; Zhang, X.; Masson, J.-F.; Peng, W. Boronic Acid Functionalized Au Nanoparticles for Selective MicroRNA Signal Amplification in Fiber-Optic Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensing System. ACS Sens. 2018, 3, 929–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Yuan, H.; Ji, W.; Chu, S.; Liu, Q.; Guang, J.; Sun, G.; Zhang, Y.; Han, X.; Masson, J.-F.; Peng, W. Au nanoparticles as label-free competitive reporters for sensitivity enhanced fiber-optic SPR heparin sensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 154, 112039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, J.R.; Miao, Y.Q.; He, N.Y.; Wu, X.H.; Li, S.J. Nanotechnology and biosensors. Biotechnol. Adv. 2004, 22, 505–518. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sagadevan, S.; Periasamy, M. Recent Trends in Nanobiosensors and Their Applications—A Review. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2014, 36, 62–69. [Google Scholar]
  33. Souza, L.R.R.; Zanatta, M.B.T.; da Silva, I.A.; da Veiga, M.A.M.S. Mercury determination in soil and sludge samples by HR CS GFAAS: Comparison of sample preparation procedures and chemical modifiers. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 2018, 33, 1477–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhou, C.; Sun, C.J.; Luo, Z.W.; Liu, K.P.; Yang, X.J.; Zou, H.M.; Li, Y.X.; Duan, Y.X. Fiber-optic biosensor for detection of genetically modified food based on catalytic hairpin assembly reaction and nanocomposites assisted signal amplification. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 254, 956–965. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zeng, S.; Yu, X.; Law, W.-C.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, R.; Dinh, X.-Q.; Ho, H.-P.; Yong, K.-T. Size dependence of Au NP-enhanced surface plasmon resonance based on differential phase measurement. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 176, 1128–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lu, J.; Van Stappen, T.; Spasic, D.; Delport, F.; Vermeire, S.; Gils, A.; Lammertyn, J. Fiber optic-SPR platform for fast and sensitive infliximab detection in serum of inflammatory bowel disease patients. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 79, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Daems, D.; Lu, J.; Delport, F.; Mariën, N.; Orbie, L.; Aernouts, B.; Adriaens, I.; Huybrechts, T.; Saeys, W.; Spasic, D.; et al. Competitive inhibition assay for the detection of progesterone in dairy milk using a fiber-optic SPR biosensor. Anal. Chim. Acta 2017, 950, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ma, N.; Ren, X.; Wang, H.; Kuang, X.; Fan, D.; Wu, D.; Wei, Q. Ultrasensitive Controlled Release Aptasensor Using Thymine–Hg2+–Thymine Mismatch as a Molecular Switch for Hg2+ Detection. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 14069–14075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Duan, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Q.; Lu, M.; Ji, W.; Zhang, Y.; Jing, Z.; Peng, W. TFBG-SPR DNA-biosensor for Renewable Ultra-trace Detection of Mercury Ions. J. Light. Technol. 2020, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, N.; Lin, M.; Dai, H.; Ma, H. Functionalized gold nanoparticles/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for ultrasensitive electrochemical sensing of mercury ions based on thymine–mercury–thymine structure. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 79, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, Y.; Zhang, Z.-Y.; Yang, H.-F.; Shao, G.; Gan, F. Highly selective fluorescent carbon dots probe for mercury(ii) based on thymine–mercury(ii)–thymine structure. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 3982–3988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Wei, T.; Dong, T.; Wang, Z.; Bao, J.; Tu, W.; Dai, Z. Aggregation of Individual Sensing Units for Signal Accumulation: Conversion of Liquid-Phase Colorimetric Assay into Enhanced Surface-Tethered Electrochemical Analysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 8880–8883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xia, F.; Song, H.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, W.-M.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X.-Z.; Wang, B.-T.; Dai, Z.-X. Ultra-high sensitivity SPR fiber sensor based on multilayer nanoparticle and Au film coupling enhancement. Measurement 2020, 164, 108083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fauzi, N.I.M.; Fen, Y.W.; Omar, N.A.S.; Saleviter, S.; Daniyal, W.M.E.M.M.; Hashim, H.S.; Nasrullah, M. Nanostructured Chitosan/Maghemite Composites Thin Film for Potential Optical Detection of Mercury Ion by Surface Plasmon Resonance Investigation. Polymers 2020, 12, 1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Boruah, B.S.; Ojah, N.; Biswas, R. Bio-Inspired Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Enhanced Sensing of Mercury Through Green Synthesized Silver Nanoparticle. J. Light. Technol. 2020, 38, 2086–2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Prakashan, V.; Georgeab, G.; Sanu, M.S.; Sajna, M.S.; Saritha, A.; Sudarsanakumar, C.; Biju, P.; Josepha, C.; Unnikrishnan, N. Investigations on SPR induced Cu@Ag core shell doped SiO2-TiO2-ZrO2 fiber optic sensor for mercury detection. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 507, 144957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Taniguchi, M.; Siddiki, M.S.R.; Ueda, S.; Maeda, I. Mercury (II) sensor based on monitoring dissociation rate of the trans-acting factor MerR from cis-element by surface plasmon resonance. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 67, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Huang, D.; Hu, T.; Chen, N.; Zhang, W.; Di, J. Development of silver/gold nanocages onto indium tin oxide glass as a reagentless plasmonic mercury sensor. Anal. Chim. Acta 2014, 825, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shukla, G.M.; Punjabi, N.; Kundu, T.; Mukherji, S. Optimization of Plasmonic U-Shaped Optical Fiber Sensor for Mercury Ions Detection Using Glucose Capped Silver Nanoparticles. IEEE Sens. J. 2019, 19, 3224–3231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A schematic of the thymidine-functionalized fiber-optic surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor for Hg2+ detection.
Figure 1. A schematic of the thymidine-functionalized fiber-optic surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor for Hg2+ detection.
Nanomaterials 11 00397 g001
Figure 2. A schematic illustration of the fabrication of the thymine-modified gold nanoparticles (Au NPs/T).
Figure 2. A schematic illustration of the fabrication of the thymine-modified gold nanoparticles (Au NPs/T).
Nanomaterials 11 00397 g002
Figure 3. The XPS spectra of Au NPs/AET and Au NPs/T: (a) N1s spectrum of the Au NPs/AET; (b) S2p spectrum of Au NPs/AET; (c) O1s spectrum of the Au NPs/AET; (d) N1s spectrum of the Au NPs/T; (e) S2p spectrum of Au NPs/T; (f) O1s spectrum of the Au NPs/T.
Figure 3. The XPS spectra of Au NPs/AET and Au NPs/T: (a) N1s spectrum of the Au NPs/AET; (b) S2p spectrum of Au NPs/AET; (c) O1s spectrum of the Au NPs/AET; (d) N1s spectrum of the Au NPs/T; (e) S2p spectrum of Au NPs/T; (f) O1s spectrum of the Au NPs/T.
Nanomaterials 11 00397 g003
Figure 4. The characterization of Au NPs: (a) UV–vis absorption of Au NPs/AET and Au NPs/T; (b) TEM image of Au NPs/T.
Figure 4. The characterization of Au NPs: (a) UV–vis absorption of Au NPs/AET and Au NPs/T; (b) TEM image of Au NPs/T.
Nanomaterials 11 00397 g004
Figure 5. Sensing of Hg2+ ions with the fiber-optic SPR sensor: real time sensing process of Hg2+ ions.
Figure 5. Sensing of Hg2+ ions with the fiber-optic SPR sensor: real time sensing process of Hg2+ ions.
Nanomaterials 11 00397 g005
Figure 6. SEM image of sensing surface after the detection of Hg2+ ions: (a) without Hg2+; (b) the presence of Hg2+.
Figure 6. SEM image of sensing surface after the detection of Hg2+ ions: (a) without Hg2+; (b) the presence of Hg2+.
Nanomaterials 11 00397 g006
Figure 7. The optimization concentrations of T-COOH for the modification of a fiber-optic sensing surface.
Figure 7. The optimization concentrations of T-COOH for the modification of a fiber-optic sensing surface.
Nanomaterials 11 00397 g007
Figure 8. The optimization volumes of T-COOH (0.1 mM) for its modification on Au NPs.
Figure 8. The optimization volumes of T-COOH (0.1 mM) for its modification on Au NPs.
Nanomaterials 11 00397 g008
Figure 9. SPR signal responses of Hg2+ detection: (a) different concentrations of Hg2+ samples (0–20 μM); (b) linear range for Hg2+ determination at the concentrations ranging from 80 to 200 nM.
Figure 9. SPR signal responses of Hg2+ detection: (a) different concentrations of Hg2+ samples (0–20 μM); (b) linear range for Hg2+ determination at the concentrations ranging from 80 to 200 nM.
Nanomaterials 11 00397 g009
Figure 10. SPR responses for different metal ions based on sandwich structure.
Figure 10. SPR responses for different metal ions based on sandwich structure.
Nanomaterials 11 00397 g010
Table 1. Comparison of this work with some published assays for Hg2+ ion detection by SPR sensors.
Table 1. Comparison of this work with some published assays for Hg2+ ion detection by SPR sensors.
Detection MethodLinear RangeLODReference
SPR sensors0.01–0.5 ppm49.9 nM[44]
Fiber-optic LSPR sensor30 to 200 μM30 μM[25]
Fiber-optic LSPR sensor1 ppb to 15 ppb1.5 ppb[45]
Fiber-optic SPR sensor0.01 to 1000 µM10 nM[46]
SPR sensors1–25 µM1 µM[24]
SPR sensors101–104 µg/L5 µg/L[47]
SPR sensors0.01–5 ppm5 ppb[48]
SPR sensors0–100 ppb2 ppb[49]
Fiber-optic SPR sensor0–20 μM9.98 nMThis work
Table 2. Spiked recovery of the present fiber-optic SPR sensor for Hg2+ ion detection in the tap water (n = 3).
Table 2. Spiked recovery of the present fiber-optic SPR sensor for Hg2+ ion detection in the tap water (n = 3).
SampleHg2+ Added
/nM
Hg2+ Found
/nM
Recovery (%)
Mean ± RSD,
n = 3
18086.1 ± 7.8108 ± 10
210097.4 ± 12.697 ± 12.6
3200211.7 ± 21.3106 ± 11
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yuan, H.; Sun, G.; Peng, W.; Ji, W.; Chu, S.; Liu, Q.; Liang, Y. Thymine-Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles (Au NPs) for a Highly Sensitive Fiber-Optic Surface Plasmon Resonance Mercury Ion Nanosensor. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11020397

AMA Style

Yuan H, Sun G, Peng W, Ji W, Chu S, Liu Q, Liang Y. Thymine-Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles (Au NPs) for a Highly Sensitive Fiber-Optic Surface Plasmon Resonance Mercury Ion Nanosensor. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(2):397. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11020397

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yuan, Huizhen, Guangyi Sun, Wei Peng, Wei Ji, Shuwen Chu, Qiang Liu, and Yuzhang Liang. 2021. "Thymine-Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles (Au NPs) for a Highly Sensitive Fiber-Optic Surface Plasmon Resonance Mercury Ion Nanosensor" Nanomaterials 11, no. 2: 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11020397

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop