Next Article in Journal
The Potent G-Quadruplex-Binding Compound QN-302 Downregulates S100P Gene Expression in Cells and in an In Vivo Model of Pancreatic Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Chiral Binaphthalene Building Blocks for Self-Assembled Nanoscale CPL Emitters
Previous Article in Journal
(n, m) Distribution of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Grown from a Non-Magnetic Palladium Catalyst
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Characteristics of Water-Insoluble Tin-Porphyrins for Designing the One-Photon-Induced Two-Electron Oxidation of Water in Artificial Photosynthesis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 6
10.3390/molecules28062447
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Photoactivatable BODIPYs for Live-Cell PALM

by
Yang Zhang
1,*,
Yeting Zheng
2,
Andrea Tomassini
2,
Ambarish Kumar Singh
2 and
Françisco M. Raymo
2,*
1
Program of Polymer and Color Chemistry, Department of Textile Engineering, Chemistry and Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA
2
Laboratory for Molecular Photonics, Department of Chemistry, University of Miami, 1301 Memorial Drive, Coral Gables, FL 33146-0431, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(6), 2447; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28062447
Submission received: 20 February 2023 / Revised: 3 March 2023 / Accepted: 4 March 2023 / Published: 7 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemical Insights in Photofunctional Organic Compounds—a Themed Issue Dedicated to Professor Vaidhyanathan Ramamurthy)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM) relies on fluorescence photoactivation and single-molecule localization to overcome optical diffraction and reconstruct images of biological samples with spatial resolution at the nanoscale. The implementation of this subdiffraction imaging method, however, requires fluorescent probes with photochemical and photophysical properties specifically engineered to enable the localization of single photoactivated molecules with nanometer precision. The synthetic versatility and outstanding photophysical properties of the borondipyrromethene (BODIPY) chromophore are ideally suited to satisfy these stringent requirements. Specifically, synthetic manipulations of the BODIPY scaffold can be invoked to install photolabile functional groups and photoactivate fluorescence under photochemical control. Additionally, targeting ligands can be incorporated in the resulting photoactivatable fluorophores (PAFs) to label selected subcellular components in live cells. Indeed, photoactivatable BODIPYs have already allowed the sub-diffraction imaging of diverse cellular substructures in live cells using PALM and can evolve into invaluable analytical probes for bioimaging applications.

1. Introduction

The fluorescence microscope has become an indispensable tool in the biomedical laboratory to probe the dynamics and structures of biological samples at the micrometer level [1]. Indeed, the minimally invasive character, fast response and high sensitivity of fluorescence measurements [2], in conjunction with the availability of vast libraries of fluorescent probes and labeling kits from commercial sources [3], have turned fluorescence microscopy into the analytical method of choice to unravel the fundamentals of cellular processes [4]. Nonetheless, the spatial resolution of conventional fluorescence imaging schemes is, at best, two orders of magnitude larger than the dimensions of molecules. As a result, the structural factors regulating cellular functions at the molecular level remain elusive.
Optical diffraction [5] is the fundamental physical phenomenon that prevents the spatial resolution of fluorescence microscopes, based on far-field optics, from being significantly smaller than the wavelength of the emitted light [1]. Specifically, the objective lens of the microscope projects exciting radiation on the sample and collects the resulting emitted light (Figure 1a). The latter is focused in the form of a diffraction pattern (Figure 1b), called the Airy Pattern, with physical dimensions that are predominantly controlled by the wavelength of the emitted radiation. The radius of the inner disk of the Airy Pattern is approximately half of the emitted wavelength, which happens to be in the visible region of the electromagnetic spectrum for most bioimaging applications. It follows that the Airy pattern of a single fluorescent molecule is hundreds of nanometers in size. As a result, distinct fluorescent molecules can be resolved only if their distance is greater than the sum of the radii of their Airy disks.
The advent of super-resolution imaging [6,7,8] provided viable strategies to overcome diffraction and visualize structural features at the nanoscale with transformative implications in biology and medicine. Indeed, the resulting imaging methods allow the acquisition of fluorescence images with sub-diffraction resolution by differentiating closely spaced fluorophores in time. Some of these methods are based on the localization of single molecules with switchable fluorescence to reconstruct subdiffraction images and are collectively called single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) [9]. One of these SMLM strategies relies on photochemical reactions to switch the fluorescence of single molecules and is termed photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM) [10]. This ingenious and powerful methodology, however, cannot be implemented with conventional fluorophores. It demands, instead, biocompatible emissive probes with photochemical and photophysical properties specifically engineered for this application [11]. The stringent requirements for the implementation of PALM can be satisfied with appropriate structural modifications of the basic scaffold of the borondipyrromethene (BODIPY) chromophore [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. In this review, we illustrate the structural designs and operating principles of all BODIPY derivatives with photoactivatable fluorescence developed so far for PALM of live cells.

2. Photoactivated Localization Microscopy

PALM overcomes diffraction relying on fluorescence photoactivation and single-molecule detection to enable the visualization of biological samples with spatial resolution at the nanometer level [6,9,10,11]. Specifically, a given sample of interest is labeled with probes capable of switching from a nonemissive state to an emissive form under irradiation at an appropriate activation wavelength (λAc). The entire field of view is then illuminated at λAc with sufficiently-low power densities to activate only a sparse subset of probes (Figure 2a,b) and ensure negligible probability of finding emissive species at subdiffraction separations. If brightness and photon budget of the emissive species are sufficiently high for single-molecule detection and localization with nanometer precision, respectively, irradiation at their excitation wavelength (λEx) then allows the determination of their spatial coordinates (Figure 2b,c). Further excitation eventually bleaches the localized probes and permanently turns off their fluorescence (Figure 2c,d). A new subset of probes is then activated, localized and bleached. The very same sequence of three steps is reiterated thousands of times to provide multiple subsets of localized coordinates (Figure 2e–h), which can ultimately be combined into a reconstructed subdiffraction image (Figure 2i).
The overall result of PALM is the ability to visualize structural features with a spatial resolution that would be impossible to achieve with conventional fluorescence imaging schemes [6,9,10,11]. The downside of this transformative strategy, however, is that the probes required for its implementation must satisfy stringent photochemical and photophysical requirements. Indeed, they must switch from nonemissive to emissive states under illumination conditions that, ideally, do not cause any photodamage to biological samples. Furthermore, the emissive form must have a large molar absorption coefficient (ε) at λEx and a high fluorescence quantum yield (ϕFl) for the brightness (ε × ϕFl) to be appropriate for single-molecule detection. Additionally, the emissive species must also be able to tolerate multiple excitation/deactivation cycles to allow the detection of hundreds of emitted photons per molecule and, hence, permit localization with nanometer precision. Engineering such a unique combination of properties into a single molecular construct, while retaining compatibility with biological environments and labeling technologies, is a daunting task.

3. Photoactivatable Fluorophores

Photoactivatable fluorophores (PAFs) switch from a nonemissive to an emissive state under illumination at an appropriate activation wavelength (λAc in Figure 3) [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. The latter species produces fluorescence upon irradiation at the corresponding excitation wavelength (λEx in Figure 3). As a result, PAFs enable the photoactivation of fluorescence in a defined region of space at a precise interval of time, relying on the interplay of lasers operating at λAc and λEx. In turn, the spatiotemporal control of fluorescence permits the implementation of imaging strategies that would be impossible to perform with conventional fluorophores. Indeed, PAFs allow the sequence of steps required to (1) overcome diffraction in PALM (Figure 2) [10], (2) track dynamic events in fluorescence photoactivation and dissipation (FPD) [37], (3) monitor fluid flow in microscaled channels in flow-tagging velocimetry [38] and (4) write and read optical barcodes in living organisms [39].
PAFs for irreversible fluorescence photoactivation (Figure 3a) are generally constructed by integrating a fluorescent chromophore (fluorophore in Figure 3) and a photocleavable protecting group (photocage in Figure 3) within the same molecular skeleton [24,27]. Upon illumination at λAc, the photocage separates from the fluorophore, enabling the latter to produce fluorescence upon irradiation at λEx. PAFs for reversible fluorescence photoactivation (Figure 3b) are instead assembled by covalently connecting a fluorophore to a photochromic chromophore (photochrome in Figure 3). The latter component interconverts reversibly between two distinct states upon illumination at λAc, allowing the fluorophore to emit under irradiation at λEx only in one of the two interconvertible states.
In both structural designs for fluorescence photoactivation, intramolecular quenching can be exploited to encourage the nonradiative deactivation of the fluorophore and prevent fluorescence in the initial state of the PAF. The physical separation of the photocage from the fluorophore (Figure 3a) or the conversion of the photochrome (Figure 3b) suppresses the quenching pathway, permits the radiative deactivation of the fluorophore and generates fluorescence. Based on this mechanism, the absorption (Figure 4a,c) of the fluorophore remains essentially unaffected with photoactivation, while the emission (Figure 4b,d) increases significantly. Alternatively, the photoinduced disconnection of the photocage or conversion of the photochrome can be engineered to shift bathochromically the absorption of the fluorophore (Figure 4e,g). Irradiation at a λEx within the shifted absorption band selectively excites the photochemical product to switch fluorescence from off to on (Figure 4f,h). Indeed, the lack of any absorbance at λEx for the initial state of the PAF eliminates any background fluorescence, that is unavoidable (Figure 4b) for systems based on intramolecular quenching. In fact, unitary quenching efficiencies are hardly achievable, limiting the contrast levels accessible with photoactivation mechanisms based on intramolecular quenching. In turn, a limited contrast would complicate the single-molecule detection of a few strongly-emissive probes in the presence of a large excess of weakly-emissive species, which is an essential step (Figure 2b,c) of PALM [10]. Additionally, the lack of any significant change in absorption with photoactivation (Figure 4a,c) prevents the selective bleaching of the photoactivated species under irradiation at λEx, which is also an essential step (Figure 2c,d) of PALM. Thus, PAFs, operating on the basis photoinduced bathochromic absorption shifts rather than intramolecular quenching, should ideally be the photoactivatable probes of choice for PALM. Nonetheless, both photoactivation mechanisms have been used so far to reconstruct PALM images of live cells with photoactivatable cyanine [40,41], dihydrofuran [42], oxime [43], rhodamine [44,45,46,47,48], thioimide [49] and BODIPY [50,51,52,53] derivatives. The latter family of PAFs is the focus of this review.

4. Borondipyrromethenes

BODIPY chromophores consist of two pyrrole heterocycles bridged by a pair of carbon and boron atoms [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Symmetrical BODIPYs are generally synthesized from an aldehyde or acyl chloride precursor and two equivalents of the corresponding pyrrole heterocycle (Figure 5). Unsymmetrical BODIPYs can similarly be prepared from two different pyrrole precursors, as long as one of the two incorporates an acyl group in the α-position relative to the nitrogen atom. After condensation of the three or two molecular fragments into a single covalent skeleton, the boron atom must be introduced to lock the two heterocyclic subunits in a co-planar arrangement and allow electronic delocalization across the entire molecular construct. The resulting chromophoric platforms absorb in the green region of the electromagnetic spectrum with molar absorption coefficient (ε) close to 70,000 M™1 cm™1, when the substituents (R1–R3) of the pyrrole heterocycle do not allow further electronic delocalization. When extended electronic conjugation is instead possible over R1, R2 and/or R3, the absorption bands of BODIPYs shift to the red and, in some instances, can even reach the near-infrared region with ε approaching 100,000 M™1 cm™1.
The two ligands (R4) on the boron center are generally fluorine atoms, albeit numerous derivatives with alkoxy, alkyl or aryl groups on this position have been reported already [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. The associated pair of (B–N) bonds, holding the boron atom in place and maintaining the co-planar arrangement, tolerate a wide range of experimental conditions. As long as strong acids or strong nucleophiles are avoided, the chromophoric platform generally remains intact and, therefore, can be modified with a wealth of synthetic procedures, providing access to an essentially infinite library of BODIPY derivatives.
The group (R5) on the meso-position of the BODIPY is generally a hydrogen atom, an alkyl substituent or an aryl ring [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. In the latter instance, the conformational freedom about the dihedral angle between polycyclic chromophore and aryl substituent provides nonradiative pathways for the relaxation of the BODIPY first singlet excited state (S1). Steric hinderance, often in the form of methyl groups at R1, prevents these processes and ensures efficient radiative deactivation instead, as long as heavy atoms and/or electron acceptors/donors are not incorporated in any of the other substituents (R2–R5). The former atoms promote intersystem crossing from S1 to the first triplet excited state (T1). The latter groups can transfer electrons to/from S1. Both processes result in efficient fluorescence quenching. When the structural requirements to suppress processes competing with fluorescence are satisfied, BODIPY chromophores emit with high ϕFl, which can often approach unity. In turn, the large ε and high ϕFl translate into appropriate brightness (ε × ϕFl) levels for single-molecule detection.
The fluorescence of BODIPY fluorophores can be photoactivated with the aid of compatible photocages (Figure 2a) relying on either intramolecular quenching (Figure 3a) or bathochromic shifts (Figure 3b) [35]. Indeed, several photoactivatable BODIPYs have already been designed around these operating principles and reported in the literature [39,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64]. We implemented both photoactivation mechanisms, relying on the established photochemistry of ortho-nitrobenzyl (ONB) photocages [65]. For example, compound 1 (Figure 6) incorporates a pyridinium ring on the meso-position of a BODIPY chromophore and strongly absorbs green light (Figure 4a) [55]. Upon irradiation at a λEx of 470 nm, electron transfer from the excited BODIPY to the adjacent pyridinium cation occurs efficiently. As a result, 1 emits with a InϕFl of only 0.05 (Table 1). Upon illumination at λAc in the 300–410 nm range, the ONB group connected to the nitrogen atom of the pyridinium quencher cleaves irreversibly to generate 2 and 3. The photoinduced conversion of the pyridinium cation of 1 into the pyridine ring of 2 suppresses the quenching pathway. In fact, the latter compound emits with a FiϕFl of 0.50 (Table 1), corresponding to a contrast (FiϕFl/InϕFl) of 100. It follows that the photolytic transformation of 1 into 2 is accompanied by a gradual increase in emission intensity (Figure 4b–g).
The photoinduced conversion of 1 into 2 causes the emission band of the BODIPY fluorophores to increase from low to high intensity (Figure 6b,g) with a contrast of (FiϕFl/InϕFl) of 100 [55]. The photochemical transformation of 4 into 5 causes instead the emission band of the BODIPY fluorophore to bathochromically shift (Figure 7c,d) [57]. As a result, fluorescence switches from off to on (i.e., infinite contrast) in the spectral region where the only the photochemical product emits. Compound 4 also incorporates an ONB photocage within its molecular skeleton. Under irradiation at λAc in the 300–410 nm range, the ONB groups cleaves irreversibly to generate 5 and 6. This structural transformation converts the chiral sp3 carbon atom at the junction of the indole and oxazine heterocycles in 5 to sp2 in 6 and, only then, allows the BODIPY chromophore to extend electronic delocalization over the adjacent indole heterocycle. It follows that the photoinduced conversion of 4 into 5 bathochromically shifts the absorption and emission bands of the BODIPY fluorophore (Figure 7a–d). In fact, the reactant and product of this photochemical reaction emit with InϕFl and FiϕFl of 0.07 and 0.50 (Table 1), respectively, upon irradiation at a λEx of 480 nm.

5. Live-Cell Imaging

Compound 7 (Figure 8) was the first BODIPY derivative to have been photoactivated in live cells [54]. This molecule incorporates two hydrophilic 2-carboxyethyl substituents to ensure sufficient aqueous solubility for administration into the extracellular matrix as well as to avoid nonspecific adsorption on the many hydrophobic components in the intracellular environment. It also has a ligand for the selective covalent labeling of SNAP-tag proteins and a photocleavable ONB group. Incubation of live HeLa cells, expressing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–SNAP-tag fusions, with compound 7 results in the covalent attachment of the photoactivatable BODIPY to the protein targets, after the nucleophilic displacement of the guanine leaving group. A confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) image (Figure 8a) of the labeled cells, recorded after extensive washing of unreacted probes out of the cells, reveals negligible fluorescence. The pair of electron-withdrawing nitro groups, engineered into the ONB photocage, promote electron transfer from the excited BODIPY and ensure low emission intensity. Control measurements on a model compound, without the SNAP-tag ligand, in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) suggest InϕFl to be only 0.001 (Table 1). Upon illumination of the entire field of view at a λAc of 365 nm, the ONB group separates from the BODIPY chromophore, suppressing the quenching pathway and increasing the emission intensity. The corresponding CLSM image (Figure 8b) clearly shows significant intracellular fluorescence. Consistently, the photoactivation of the model analogue results in a FiϕFl of 0.66 (Table 1), corresponding to a contrast (FiϕFl/InϕFl) of 660.
The transformative experiments with 7 demonstrated that photoactivatable BODIPYs are, indeed, optimal probes for the spatiotemporal control of fluorescence in the interior of live cells [54]. However, only diffraction-limited fluorescence images were reported in these studies. The first examples of PALM images with photoactivatable BODIPYs were instead recorded with compound 11 (Figure 9) [50]. This molecule incorporates a paclitaxel ligand, capable of binding noncovalently the microtubules of live cells, as well as two photolabile ethyl groups on the boron atom of the BODIPY chromophore. These two groups promote the nonradiative deactivation of the excited fluorophore, presumably as a result of their conformational freedom. Control measurements in methanol suggest InϕFl to be 0.002 (Table 1). Upon irradiation at a λAc of 488 nm, the two ethyl groups are displaced by a pair of methoxy groups in methanol or hydroxy groups in water and, presumably, converted into ethane molecules. Control measurements in the former solvent indicate FiϕFl to be 0.96 (Table 1), corresponding to a contrast (FiϕFl/InϕFl) of 480. The photoactivated fluorescence of this PAF could be exploited to capture diffraction-limited (Figure 9a) and reconstruct PALM (Figure 9b) images of the microtubules of live HeLa cells. Comparison of the two clearly reveals the drastic improvement in spatial resolution possible with PALM. Indeed, the full width at half maximum of the emission-intensity profiles (blue and red bars in Figure 9), measured across a microtubule in the two images, decreases from 453 to only 94 nm.
Compound 14 (Figure 10) is another remarkable example of photoactivatable BODIPY successfully employed to visualize intracellular targets with subdiffraction resolution in live cells [52]. This molecule has a photolabile tetrazine appendage connected to the meso-position of a BODIPY chromophore though a para-phenylene spacer. It also incorporates a ligand for the selective covalent labeling of HaloTag proteins. Control measurements in acetonitrile indicate InϕFl to be only 0.002 (Table 1). Presumably, electron transfer from the tetrazine ring to the excited BODIPY chromophore is responsible for the predominant nonradiative deactivation of the chromophoric component. Upon illumination at a λAc of 405 nm, however, the tetrazine appendage cleaves to release one molecule of acetonitrile and one of nitrogen. In turn, the photoinduced removal of the quencher causes a significant increase in emission intensity with a FiϕFl of 0.28 (Table 1), corresponding to a contrast (FiϕFl/InϕFl) of 141. Incubation of live COS–K1 cells, expressing HaloTag on histone 2B (H2B), with compound 14 results in the covalent attachment of PAFs to the H2B–HaloTag fusions. After extensive washing of unreacted probes out of the labeled cells, irradiation at λAc disconnects the tetrazine quenchers to enhance significantly the emission intensity of the BODIPY component. In turn, the photoactivated fluorescence can be exploited to acquire diffraction-limited (Figure 10a) and reconstruct PALM (Figure 10b) images of the sample. Comparing the two imaging modalities shows, once again, the significant improvement in spatial resolution possible through the sequence of photoactivation, localization and bleaching steps (Figure 2a–d) characteristic of PALM.
The fluorescence photoactivation mechanism of 7, 11 and 14 relies on the suppression of a quenching pathway with the photoinduced cleavage of an ONB photocage, a pair of ethyl ligands or a tetrazine ring [50,52,54]. The inability to achieve unitary quenching efficiencies in the initial state, however, results in nonzero InϕFl. As a result, the photochemical products must be detected against some level of background fluorescence coming from the reactants. Additionally, these photochemical reactions have negligible influence on the spectral position of the BODIPY absorption, preventing the selective bleaching of the photoactivated species. Such drawbacks complicate the implementation of the sequence of steps (Figure 2a–i) required for PALM. Our mechanism for fluorescence photoactivation (Figure 7), based on a photoinduced bathochromic shift, overcomes both limitations [57]. In particular, we designed an analogue of our original photoactivatable BODIPY, in the shape of compound 17 (Figure 11), specifically for live-cell PALM [51]. This molecule has a styryl substituent, in place of the methyl group of the original molecule (cf., 4), to position the absorption and emission bands of the photoactivated BODIPY in the red region of the electromagnetic spectrum, as well as to enhance its ε and facilitate single-molecule detection. Additionally, 17 incorporates also an N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (NHS) in position 5 of the indole heterocycle to enable the covalent connection of this compound to the primary amino groups of intracellular proteins. Indeed, incubation of live COS–7 cells with 17 results in the nonselective labeling of intracellular proteins and localization of the resulting conjugates in the lysosomal compartments. The characteristic fluorescence of the BODIPY chromophore in the spectral region where the initial state emits can clearly be observed, prior to photoactivation, in a diffraction-limited image (Figure 11a) of a single cell. The individual labeled organelles, however, have subdiffraction dimensions and cannot be resolved. The corresponding PALM counterpart (Figure 11b) shows instead single lysosomes with an average diameter of ca. 80 nm. This particular image was reconstructed from 100,000 subsets of coordinates acquired sequentially (Figure 2a–i) with a precision of ca. 15 nm in the single-molecule localization of the photoactivated probes.
The photocleavable groups of 1, 4, 7, 14 and 17 require ultraviolet radiation or, at best, violet light for photoactivation [51,52,54,55,57]. Illumination of live cells with λAc in this spectral range (350–410 nm), however, causes significant photodamage [66]. Compound 11 is a remarkable exception [50]. It can be photoactivated under illumination at a λAc of 488 nm. Nonetheless, systematic cytotoxicity studies show that negligible cell mortality is observed only under irradiation at wavelengths longer than 500 nm with the typical power densities required for photoactivation [66]. Compound 20 (Figure 12) satisfies this crucial requirement [64]. It absorbs and emits in the red region of the electromagnetic spectrum with a InϕFl of 0.90 (Table 1). Upon illumination at a λAc of 630 nm, one of the two styryl substituents on the pyrrole heterocycles cleaves to generate 21. The decrease in electronic delocalization with the photochemical conversion of 20 into 21 and 23 causes hypsochromic shifts in absorption and emission, albeit FiϕFl was not reported. In the interior of live cells, the photochemical product reacts further with intracellular thiols, such as glutathione, to the corresponding adducts (e.g., 23), causing a further hypsochromic shift in absorption and emission. Indeed, CLSM images of live HeLa cells, recorded before (Figure 12a) and after (Figure 12b) photoactivation with λEx of 561 and 488 nm, respectively, reveal fluorescence in both instances.
The ability to photoactivate fluorescence with red light is a significant advancement in the development of PAFs for bioimaging applications. However, the photoinduced hypsochromic shifts in absorption and emission, engineered into 20, complicate the selective excitation of the photochemical product [64]. In turn, this drawback would complicate the single-molecule localization of the photoactivated species and their selective bleaching. In fact, only diffraction-limited images were reported in these seminal studies. The photochemical and photophysical properties of compound 24 (Figure 13) overcome some of these limitations; however, this PAF requires green, rather than red, light for photoactivation [53]. This molecule incorporates two BODIPY components connected through a sulfinyl group. It also has two aliphatic arms with terminal morpholine rings to encourage solubilization in aqueous environments and direct the overall molecular construct into the lysosomal compartments of live cells. The pair of BODIPY chromophores absorb and emit in the green region of the electromagnetic spectrum with a InϕFl 0.20 (Table 1). Upon irradiation at a λAc of 488 or 532 nm, the sulfinyl group is expelled to allow the direct connection of the two BODIPY fragments into a single chromophoric platform. As a result, the absorption and emission bands bathochromically shift from the green to the red region with a FiϕFl of 0.23 (Table 1). Incubation of live RAW264.7 cells with 24 results in the lysosomal localization of the PAFs. Illumination of the labeled cells at a λAc of 488 nm can then be exploited to photoactivate the internalized probes and implement the sequence of steps (Figure 2a–i) required for the reconstruction of PALM images. Comparison of diffraction-limited (Figure 13a) and PALM (Figure 13b) images of the labeled cells shows, yet again, the significant improvement in spatial resolution possible with sequential single-molecule localization. In fact, the photoactivated species can be localized in the lysosomal compartments of the live cells with a precision of ca. 39 nm.

6. Conclusions

The synthetic versatility of the BODIPY platform permits the installation of photolabile functional groups on the meso-position (1, 7 and 14), pyrrole heterocycles (4, 17, 20 and 24) or boron center (11) of the chromophoric platform. The resulting fluorophore–photocage constructs increase their emission intensities or shift their emission bands in response to photoactivation. Such fluorescence changes are a result of the suppression of nonradiative decay pathways (1, 7, 11 and 14) or modifications in electronic delocalization (4, 17, 20 and 24) with the photoinduced conversion of reactant into product. Synthetic manipulations also permit the introduction of functional groups on the BODIPY scaffold for the covalent (7, 14 and 17) or noncovalent (11 and 24) labeling of intracellular targets. The photoactivatable fluorescence of the resulting intracellular labels can be exploited to capture diffraction-limited images of live cells as well as, when appropriate photochemical and photophysical requirements are satisfied, to reconstruct sub-diffraction images of the labeled intracellular components. The latter imaging protocol requires reiterative sequences of photoactivation, localization and bleaching steps (Figure 2a–i) and is generally facilitated if the fluorescence switching mechanism is based on changes in electronic delocalization. Such photochemical transformations can be engineered to cause significant bathochromic shifts in absorption, enable the selective excitation of the product and switch fluorescence on with infinite contrast in the spectral region where only the latter species emits. In turn, the photoactivation of fluorescence with infinite contrast facilitates the detection of sparse populations of single photoactivated molecules in the presence of a large excess of the starting reactant. Additionally, operating principles based on photoinduced bathochromic shifts also permit the selective bleaching of the localized photoactivated species in the presence of a large excess of the starting reactant. The combination of these photochemical and photophysical properties translates into the ability to localize single molecules with a precision approaching 15 nm in the interior of live cells and visualize organelles with diameters as small as 80 nm. Indeed, BODIPYs with photoactivatable fluorescence are a promising addition to the vast library of existing fluorescent dyes. They may well become the probes of choice for live-cell PALM to enable the routine visualization of subcellular components with nanometer spatial resolution, that is otherwise inaccessible to conventional fluorescence imaging schemes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.M.R.; writing—original draft preparation, F.M.R.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z (Yang Zhang), Y.Z. (Yeting Zheng), A.T., A.K.S. and F.M.R.; supervision, F.M.R.; project administration, Y.Z. (Yang Zhang) and F.M.R..; funding acquisition, Y.Z. (Yang Zhang) and F.M.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIGMS-R01GM143397 and NIGMS-R21GM141675) and National Science Foundation (CHE-1954430).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Murphy, D.B. Fundamentals of Light Microscopy and Electronic Imaging; Wiley-Liss: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lakowicz, J.R. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  3. Johnson, I.D. The Molecular Probes Handbook—A Guide to Fluorescent Probes and Labeling Technologies; Life Technologies Corporation: Carlsbad, CA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  4. Pawley, J.B. (Ed.) Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  5. Born, M.; Wolf, E. Principles of Optics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  6. Betzig, E. Single molecules, cells and super-resolution optics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 8034–8053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hell, S.W. Nanoscopy with focused light. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 8054–8066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Moerner, W.E. Single-molecule spectroscopy, imaging and photocontrol: Foundations for super-resolution microscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 8067–8093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sauer, M.; Heilemann, M. Single-molecule localization microscopy in eukaryotes. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 7478–7509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Betzig, E.; Patterson, G.H.; Sougrat, R.; Lindwasser, O.W.; Olenych, S.; Bonifacino, J.S.; Davidson, M.W.; Lippincott-Schwartz, J.; Hess, H.F. Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science 2006, 313, 1642–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sengupta, P.; van Engelenburg, S.B.; Lippincott-Schwartz, J. Superresolution imaging of biological systems using photoactivated localization microscopy. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 3189–3202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Loudet, A.; Burgess, K. BODIPY dyes and their derivatives: Syntheses and spectroscopic properties. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 4891–4932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ziessel, R.; Ulrich, G.; Harriman, A. The chemistry of BODIPY: A new El Dorado for fluorescence tools. New J. Chem. 2007, 31, 496–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ulrich, G.; Ziessel, R.; Harriman, A. The chemistry of fluorescent BODIPY dyes: Versatility unsurpassed. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1184–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Benstead, M.; Mehl, G.H.; Boyle, R.W. 4,4′-Difluoro-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacenes (BODIPYs) as components of novel light active materials. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 3573–3601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Boens, N.; Leen, V.; Dehaen, W. Fluorescent indicators based on BODIPY. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 1130–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kamkaew, A.; Lim, S.H.; Lee, H.B.; Kiew, L.V.; Chung, L.Y.; Burgess, K. BODIPY dyes in photodynamic therapy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lu, H.; Mack, J.; Yang, Y.; Shen, Z. Structural modification strategies for the rational design of red/NIR region BODIPYs. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 4778–4823. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Ni, Y.; Wu, J. Far-red and near infrared BODIPY dyes: Synthesis and applications for fluorescent pH probes and bio-imaging. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 12, 3774–3791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mitchison, T.J.; Sawin, K.E.; Theriot, J.A.; Gee, K.; Mallavarapu, A. Caged fluorescent probes. Methods Enzymol. 1998, 291, 63–78. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wysocki, L.M.; Lavis, L.D. Advances in the chemistry of small molecule fluorescent probes. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2011, 15, 752–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Puliti, D.; Warther, D.; Orange, C.; Specht, A.; Goeldner, M. Small photoactivatable molecules for controlled fluorescence activation. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011, 19, 1023–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Raymo, F.M. Photoactivatable synthetic dyes for fluorescence imaging at the nanoscale. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 2379–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Raymo, F.M. Photoactivatable fluorophores. ISRN Phys. Chem. 2012, 2012, 619251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, W.-H.; Zheng, G. Photoactivatable fluorophores and techniques for biological imaging applications. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2012, 11, 460–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Klán, P.; Šolomek, T.; Bochet, C.G.; Blanc, A.; Givens, R.; Rubina, M.; Popik, V.; Kostikov, A.; Wirz, J. Photoremovable protecting groups in chemistry and biology: Reaction mechanisms and efficacy. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 119–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Raymo, F.M. Photoactivatable synthetic fluorophores. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 14840–14850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gorka, A.P.; Nani, R.R.; Schnermann, M.J. Cyanine polyene reactivity: Scope and biomedical applications. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 7584–7598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lavis, L.D. Teaching old dyes new tricks: Biological probes built from fluoresceins and rhodamines. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2017, 86, 825–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Chevalier, A.; Renard, P.Y.; Romieu, A. Azo-based fluorogenic probes for biosensing and bioimaging: Recent advances and upcoming challenges. Chem. Asian J. 2017, 12, 2008–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zhang, Y.; Raymo, F.M. Live-cell imaging at the nanoscale with bioconjugatable and photoactivatable fluorophores. Bioconjugate Chem. 2020, 31, 1052–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhang, Y.; Raymo, F.M. Photoactivatable fluorophores for single-molecule localization microscopy of live cells. Methods Appl. Fluoresc. 2020, 8, 032002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zou, Z.; Luo, Z.L.; Xu, X.; Yang, S.; Qing, Z.H.; Liu, J.W.; Yang, R. Photoactivatable fluorescent probes for spatiotemporal-controlled biosensing and imaging. Trends Anal. Chem. 2020, 125, 115811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shaban Ragab, S. Using organic compounds for fluorescence photoactivation. Egypt. J. Chem. 2021, 64, 2113–2126. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Meana, Y.; Raymo, F.M. BODIPYs with photoactivatable fluorescence. Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 27, 11257–11267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kikuchi, K.; Adair, L.D.; Lin, J.R.; New, E.J.; Kaur, A. Photochemical mechanisms of fluorophores employed in single-molecule localization microscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202204745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Krafft, G.A.; Cummings, R.T.; Dizio, J.P.; Furukawa, R.H.; Brvenik, L.J.; Sutton, W.R.; War, B.R. Fluorescence photoactivation and dissipation (FPD). In Nucleocytoplasmic Transport; Peters, R., Trendelenburg, M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1986; pp. 35–52. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lempert, W.R.; Magee, K.; Ronney, P.; Gee, K.R.; Haugland, R.P. Flow tagging velocimetry in incompressible flow using photo-activated nonintrusive tracking of molecular motion (PHANTOMM). Exp. Fluids 1995, 18, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Dhakal, P.; Ravelo, L.; Anderson, C.L.; Collins, K.M.; Raymo, F.M. Photochemical barcodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 4485–4488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kim, D.; Chang, Y.; Park, S.; Jeong, M.G.; Kwon, Y.; Zhou, K.; Noh, J.; Choi, Y.K.; Hong, T.M.; Chang, Y.T.; et al. Blue-conversion of organic dyes produces artifacts in multicolor fluorescence imaging. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 8660–8667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Cho, Y.; An, H.J.; Kim, T.; Lee, C.; Lee, N.K. Mechanism of cyanine5 to cyanine3 photoconversion and its application for high-density single-particle tracking in a living cell. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 14125–14135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lee, H.D.; Lord, S.J.; Iwanaga, S.; Zhan, K.; Xie, H.; Williams, J.C.; Wang, H.; Bowman, G.R.; Goley, E.D.; Shapiro, L.; et al. Superresolution imaging of targeted proteins in fixed and living cells using photoactivatable organic fluorophores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 15099–15101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, L.S.; Wang, S.C.; Tang, J.; Espinoza, V.B.; Loredo, A.; Tian, Z.R.; Weisman, R.B.; Xiao, H. Oxime as a general photocage for the design of visible light photo-activatable fluorophores. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 15572–15580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lee, M.K.; Rai, P.; Williams, J.; Twieg, R.J.; Moerner, W.E. Small-molecule labeling of live cell surfaces for three-dimensional super-resolution microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 14003–14006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Grimm, J.B.; English, B.P.; Choi, H.; Muthusamy, A.K.; Mehl, B.P.; Dong, P.; Brown, T.A.; Lippincott-Schwartz, J.; Liu, Z.; Lionnet, T.; et al. Bright photoactivatable fluorophores for single-molecule imaging. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 985–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hauke, S.; von Appen, A.; Quidwai, T.; Ries, J.; Wombacher, R. Specific protein labeling with caged fluorophores for dual-color imaging and super-resolution microscopy in living cells. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zheng, Y.; Ye, Z.W.; Liu, Z.J.; Yang, W.; Zhang, X.F.; Yang, Y.J.; Xiao, Y. Nitroso-caged rhodamine: A superior green light-activatable fluorophore for single-molecule localization super-resolution imaging. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 7833–7842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, X.D.; Zhang, M.M.; Yan, Y.; Wang, M.K.; Li, J.; Yu, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Luo, X.; Qian, X.H.; Yang, Y.J. Dihydro-Si-rhodamine for live-cell localization microscopy. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 7553–7556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tang, J.; Robichaux, M.A.; Wu, K.-L.; Pei, J.; Nguyen, N.T.; Zhou, Y.; Wensel, T.G.; Xiao, H. Single-atom fluorescence switch: A general approach toward visible-light-activated dyes for biological imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 14699–14706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Wijesooriya, C.S.; Peterson, J.A.; Shrestha, P.; Gehrmann, E.J.; Winter, A.H.; Smith, E.A. A photoactivatable BODIPY probe for localization-based super-resolution cellular imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 12685–12689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Zhang, Y.; Song, K.H.; Tang, S.C.; Ravelo, L.; Cusido, J.; Sun, C.; Zhang, H.F.; Raymo, F.M. Far-red photoactivatable BODIPYs for the super-resolution imaging of live cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 12741–12745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Loredo, A.; Tang, J.; Wang, L.S.; Wu, K.L.; Peng, Z.; Xiao, H. Tetrazine as a general phototrigger to turn on fluorophores. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 4410–4415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gong, Q.; Zhang, X.; Li, W.; Guo, X.; Wu, Q.; Yu, C.; Jiao, L.; Xiao, Y.; Hao, E. Long-wavelength photoconvertible dimeric BODIPYs for super-resolution single-molecule localization imaging in near-infrared emission. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 21992–21999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kobayashi, T.; Komatsu, T.; Kamiya, M.; Campos, C.; González-Gaitán, M.; Terai, T.; Hanaoka, K.; Nagano, T.; Urano, Y. Highly activatable and environment-insensitive optical highlighters for selective spatiotemporal imaging of target proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 11153–11160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Shaban Ragab, S.; Swaminathan, S.; Baker, J.D.; Raymo, F.M. Activation of BODIPY fluorescence by the photoinduced dealkylation of a pyridinium quencher. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 14851–14855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Goswami, P.P.; Syed, A.; Beck, C.L.; Albright, T.R.; Mahoney, K.M.; Unash, R.; Smith, E.A.; Winter, A.H. BODIPY-derived photoremovable protecting groups unmasked with green light. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 3783–3786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, Y.; Swaminathan, S.; Tang, S.; Garcia-Amorós, J.; Boulina, M.; Captain, B.; Baker, J.D.; Raymo, F.M. Photoactivatable BODIPYs designed to monitor the dynamics of supramolecular nanocarriers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4709–4719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, Y.; Tang, S.C.; Sansalone, L.; Baker, J.D.; Raymo, F.M. A photoswitchable fluorophore for the real-time monitoring of dynamic events in living organisms. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 15027–15034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, X.M.; Zhang, Y.; Baker, J.D.; Raymo, F.M. A photoactivatable light tracer. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 12714–12719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sansalone, L.; Tang, S.C.; Garcia-Amorós, J.; Zhang, Y.; Nonell, S.; Baker, J.D.; Captain, B.; Raymo, F.M. A photoactivatable far-red/near-infrared BODIPY to monitor cellular dynamics in vivo. ACS Sens. 2018, 3, 1347–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Zhang, Y.; Tang, S.C.; Thapaliya, E.R.; Sansalone, L.; Raymo, F.M. Fluorescence activation with switchable oxazines. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 8799–8809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Peterson, J.A.; Wijesooriya, C.; Gehrmann, E.J.; Mahoney, K.M.; Goswami, P.P.; Albright, T.R.; Syed, A.; Dutton, A.S.; Smith, E.A.; Winter, A.H. Family of BODIPY photocages cleaved by single photons of visible/near-infrared light. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 7343–7346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Thapaliya, E.R.; Mazza, M.M.A.; Cusido, J.; Baker, J.D.; Raymo, F.M. A synthetic strategy for the structural modification of photoactivatable BODIPY-oxazine dyads. ChemPhotoChem 2020, 4, 332–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Xu, Y.; Lin, S.; He, R.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, Q.; Ng, D.K.P.; Geng, J. C=C bond oxidative cleavage of BODIPY photocages by visible light. Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 27, 11268–11272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Goeldner, M.; Givens, R. (Eds.) Dynamic Studies in Biology: Phototriggers, Photoswitches and Caged Biomolecules; Wiley-VCH: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  66. Wäldchen, S.; Lehmann, J.; Klein, T.; van de Linde, S.; Sauer, M. Light-induced cell damage in live-cell super-resolution microscopy. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 28 02447 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representations of the main optical components of a conventional fluorescence microscope (a) as well as of the Airy pattern (b) that the fluorescence of a single fluorophore produces on the focal plane of the objective lens.
Figure 1. Schematic representations of the main optical components of a conventional fluorescence microscope (a) as well as of the Airy pattern (b) that the fluorescence of a single fluorophore produces on the focal plane of the objective lens.
Molecules 28 02447 g001
Molecules 28 02447 g002 550
Figure 2. Sequence of steps (a–i) required for the reconstruction of an image with subdiffraction spatial resolution relying on fluorescence photoactivation and single-molecule localization.
Figure 2. Sequence of steps (a–i) required for the reconstruction of an image with subdiffraction spatial resolution relying on fluorescence photoactivation and single-molecule localization.
Molecules 28 02447 g002
Molecules 28 02447 g003 550
Figure 3. Structural designs for irreversible (a) and reversible (b) fluorescence photoactivation with fluorophore–photocage and fluorophore–photochrome constructs respectively.
Figure 3. Structural designs for irreversible (a) and reversible (b) fluorescence photoactivation with fluorophore–photocage and fluorophore–photochrome constructs respectively.
Molecules 28 02447 g003
Molecules 28 02447 g004 550
Figure 4. Absorption and emission spectra before (black traces) and after (green traces) the photochemical conversion of a nonemissive reactant into an emissive product expected for fluorescence-photoactivation mechanisms based on intramolecular quenching (a–d) and bathochromic shift (e–h) respectively.
Figure 4. Absorption and emission spectra before (black traces) and after (green traces) the photochemical conversion of a nonemissive reactant into an emissive product expected for fluorescence-photoactivation mechanisms based on intramolecular quenching (a–d) and bathochromic shift (e–h) respectively.
Molecules 28 02447 g004
Molecules 28 02447 g005 550
Figure 5. Molecular skeleton of the BODIPY chromophore together with its retrosynthetic analysis.
Figure 5. Molecular skeleton of the BODIPY chromophore together with its retrosynthetic analysis.
Molecules 28 02447 g005
Molecules 28 02447 g006 550
Figure 6. Absorption (a) and emission (b, λEx = 470 nm) spectra (black traces) of an equimolar MeCN solution of 1 and Bu4NOH (10 μM) at 25 °C. Emission spectra (λEx = 470 nm, green traces) of the same solution after irradiation (λAc = 300–410 nm, 3.33 mW cm™2) for 5 (c), 10 (d), 15 (e), 20 (f) and 25 min (g).
Figure 6. Absorption (a) and emission (b, λEx = 470 nm) spectra (black traces) of an equimolar MeCN solution of 1 and Bu4NOH (10 μM) at 25 °C. Emission spectra (λEx = 470 nm, green traces) of the same solution after irradiation (λAc = 300–410 nm, 3.33 mW cm™2) for 5 (c), 10 (d), 15 (e), 20 (f) and 25 min (g).
Molecules 28 02447 g006
Molecules 28 02447 g007 550
Figure 7. Normalized absorption (a,b) and emission ((c,d), λEx = 480 nm) spectra of 4 (green traces) and 5 (red traces) in MeCN at 25 °C.
Figure 7. Normalized absorption (a,b) and emission ((c,d), λEx = 480 nm) spectra of 4 (green traces) and 5 (red traces) in MeCN at 25 °C.
Molecules 28 02447 g007
Molecules 28 02447 g008 550
Figure 8. CLSM images of live HeLa cells, expressing EGFR–SNAP-tag labeled with 7, recorded before (a) and after (b) photoactivation [adapted with permission from Ref. [54]].
Figure 8. CLSM images of live HeLa cells, expressing EGFR–SNAP-tag labeled with 7, recorded before (a) and after (b) photoactivation [adapted with permission from Ref. [54]].
Molecules 28 02447 g008
Molecules 28 02447 g009 550
Figure 9. Diffraction-limited (a) and PALM (b) images of live HeLa cells, stained with 11, reporting the full width at half maximum of emission-intensity profiles (blue and red bars) measured across the labeled microtubules [adapted with permission from Ref. [50]].
Figure 9. Diffraction-limited (a) and PALM (b) images of live HeLa cells, stained with 11, reporting the full width at half maximum of emission-intensity profiles (blue and red bars) measured across the labeled microtubules [adapted with permission from Ref. [50]].
Molecules 28 02447 g009
Molecules 28 02447 g010 550
Figure 10. Diffraction-limited (a) and PALM (b) images of live CHO–K1 cells, expressing H2B–HaloTag labeled with 14 [adapted with permission from Ref. [52]].
Figure 10. Diffraction-limited (a) and PALM (b) images of live CHO–K1 cells, expressing H2B–HaloTag labeled with 14 [adapted with permission from Ref. [52]].
Molecules 28 02447 g010
Molecules 28 02447 g011 550
Figure 11. Diffraction-limited (a) and PALM (b) images of the lysosomes of live COS–7 cells, labeled with 17 [adapted with permission from Ref. [51]].
Figure 11. Diffraction-limited (a) and PALM (b) images of the lysosomes of live COS–7 cells, labeled with 17 [adapted with permission from Ref. [51]].
Molecules 28 02447 g011
Molecules 28 02447 g012 550
Figure 12. CLSM images of live HeLa cells, labeled with 20, recorded before (a) and after (b) photoactivation [adapted with permission from Ref. [64]].
Figure 12. CLSM images of live HeLa cells, labeled with 20, recorded before (a) and after (b) photoactivation [adapted with permission from Ref. [64]].
Molecules 28 02447 g012
Molecules 28 02447 g013 550
Figure 13. Diffraction-limited (a) and PALM (b) images of the lysosomes of live RAW264.7 cells labeled with 24 [adapted with permission from Ref. [53]].
Figure 13. Diffraction-limited (a) and PALM (b) images of the lysosomes of live RAW264.7 cells labeled with 24 [adapted with permission from Ref. [53]].
Molecules 28 02447 g013
Table
Table 1. Photophysical parameters.1.
Table 1. Photophysical parameters.1.
InλAbFiλAbInϕFlInλEm mFiλEmFiϕFlReference
15345460.0055265450.50[55]
45485620.075886020.50[57]
75265410.0015225390.66[54]
114985170.0024955100.96[50]
144915090.0024915090.28[52]
176086230.896566690.40[51]
206546730.90590630— 2[64]
245145610.206307010.23[53]
1 Wavelengths at the absorption maxima of the initial (InλAb) and final (FiλAb) states; wavelengths at the emission maxima of the initial (InλEm) and final (FiλEm) states; fluorescence quantum yields of the initial (InϕFl) and final (FiϕFl) states. Measured in MeCN, containing equimolar amounts of Bu4NOH, for 1, MeCN for 4 and 14, PBS for an analog of 7, lacking the SNAP-tag ligand, MeOH for 11, THF for 17, MeOH/H2O (1:1, v/v) for 20 and CH2Cl2 for 24. 2 Not reported.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Tomassini, A.; Singh, A.K.; Raymo, F.M. Photoactivatable BODIPYs for Live-Cell PALM. Molecules 2023, 28, 2447. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28062447

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Zheng Y, Tomassini A, Singh AK, Raymo FM. Photoactivatable BODIPYs for Live-Cell PALM. Molecules. 2023; 28(6):2447. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28062447

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yang, Yeting Zheng, Andrea Tomassini, Ambarish Kumar Singh, and Françisco M. Raymo. 2023. "Photoactivatable BODIPYs for Live-Cell PALM" Molecules 28, no. 6: 2447. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28062447

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop