Next Article in Journal
Gene Expression and Protein Abundance of Nuclear Receptors in Human Intestine and Liver: A New Application for Mass Spectrometry-Based Targeted Proteomics
Previous Article in Journal
Benzothiazole and Chromone Derivatives as Potential ATR Kinase Inhibitors and Anticancer Agents
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 14
10.3390/molecules27144638
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Activation of Stimulation of Interferon Genes (STING) Signal and Cancer Immunotherapy

by
Kewang Luo
1,
Ning Li
2,
Wei Ye
3,
Hanchao Gao
4,
Xinle Luo
1 and
Baohui Cheng
5,*
1
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, People’s Hospital of Longhua, The Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518109, China
2
Shenzhen Middle School, Shenzhen 518001, China
3
School of Pharmacy, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510505, China
4
Department of Nephrology, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital of Shenzhen Longhua District, Guangdong Medical University, Shenzhen 518110, China
5
Longgang E.N.T Hospital & Shenzhen Key Laboratory of E.N.T, Department of Otolaryngology, Institute of E.N.T Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518172, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(14), 4638; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27144638
Submission received: 20 June 2022 / Revised: 8 July 2022 / Accepted: 14 July 2022 / Published: 20 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Repurposing Drugs and Molecules with Anti-cancer and Immunomodulatory Effects)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Stimulator of interferon gene (STING), an intracellular receptor in the endoplasmic reticulum, could induce the production of cytokines such as type I interferon (IFN) by activating the cGAS-STING signal pathway. In recent years, activation of STING has shown great potential to enhance anti-tumor immunity and reshape the tumor microenvironment, which is expected to be used in tumor immunotherapy. A number of STING agonists have demonstrated promising biological activity and showed excellent synergistic anti-tumor effects in combination with other cancer therapies in preclinical studies and some clinical trials. The combination of STING agonists and ICI also showed a potent effect in improving anti-tumor immunity. In this review, we introduce the cGAS-STING signaling pathway and its effect in tumor immunity and discuss the recent strategies of activation of the STING signaling pathway and its research progress in tumor immunotherapy.

1. Introduction

It is widely accepted that the immune system has critical roles in the host defense in the recognition and elimination of malignancies. Innate immunity, referring to the immune ability of an individual at birth, is the first line of the host defense against infection of various pathogenic microorganisms. Innate immunity recognizes non-self-components through pattern recognition receptors to resist pathogen invasion and tissue damage [1]. After the activation of pattern recognition receptors, the innate immune response and subsequent adaptive required immune response are induced. During the process, DNA is an effective immune-stimulating molecule, which is widely used as a vaccine adjuvant to trigger immunity. The stimulator of interferon gene (STING) pathway is a critical cytoplasmic DNA-sensing process, which induces innate immunity against microorganism and bacteria [2].
STING, an intracellular recognition receptor, has important roles in modulating the transcription of many guard genes by activating the cGAS-STING signal pathway [3]. STING is located on the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and contains 379 amino acids, including 4 transmembrane helices and a spherical C-terminal domain (CTD) extending into the cytoplasm [4]. In 2008, STING was revealed to be an important ingredient in DNA-mediated innate immunity in response to the invasion of bacteria, DNA viruses, etc. [3,5,6]. Further investigation by Chen et al. demonstrated that cGAS is the cytosolic sensor that activates innate immunity by triggering type I interferon (IFN) expression [7,8]. Cytoplasmic DNA stimulates the cascade of cGAS-STING signaling. This signaling is involved in the defense against microorganisms and was determined to be effective in improving anti-tumor immunity and other autoimmune diseases.
In this review, we discuss the cGAS-STING signaling pathway and the efficacy in cancer immunity, emphasizing the strategies for activating the STING signaling pathway in cancer treatment and summarizing the clinical applications and research progress of the cGAS-STING signaling pathway in caner immunotherapy in recent years.

2. cGAS-STING Signaling Pathway and Cancer Immunotherapy

The cGAS-STING signaling pathway is an important cytoplasmic DNA-sensing pathway in vivo, which takes part in regulating pathogen infection, cancer immune response, and autoimmune diseases by triggering the production of type I IFN. In 2008, Ishikawa et al. [3,6] and Zhong et al. [5] both discovered a new transmembrane protein STING, and the second messenger cyclic guanosine diphosphate (c-di-GMP) in bacteria, which could activate the STING-dependent immune system, was also reported later. In 2013, Chen et al. identified that cyclic guanosine monophosphate adenosine monophosphate synthase (cGAS) is a direct cytoplasmic DNA transducer. cGAS activates interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) by binding to DNA in the cytoplasm, and then activates the production of type I IFN in the form of STING dependence, and triggers innate immunity [7]. It was demonstrated that the STING signal pathway can be induced by cytoplasmic DNA accumulation, such as pathogen DNA and damaged double- or single-stranded DNA (dsDNA or ssDNA) [9,10]. cGAS is a DNA recognition receptor. When cGAS accumulates with DNA under the circumstances of the cytoplasm, cGAS is activated and binds to dsDNA, and then catalyzes adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP) and guanosine 5′-triphosphate (GTP) to form cyclic guanosine monophosphate–adenosine monophosphate (cGAMP) [11].
As a secondary messenger, cGAMP combines with STING on the film of ER. Then, STING is rapidly dimerized and activated, and transfers from ER to the Golgi apparatus. Then, kinases such as TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) and IKB kinases (IKKs) in the Golgi apparatus are recruited, and these kinases phosphorylate IRF3, STING, and IκBα (the inhibitor of NF-κB). As a signaling adaptor, the phosphorylated STING collects IRF3, which forms a homodimer and transfers to the nucleus, activating the transcription and translation of type I IFN and other cytokines [12,13]. On the other hand, the phosphorylation of IκBα leads to the transfer of NF-κB to the nucleus, where it triggers the transcription and translation of proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and type I IFN [14], having an immunomodulatory effect. Type I IFNs combine with heterodimer interferon receptors (IFNAR1 and IFNAR2), and lead to the gathering of Janus family kinase1 (Jak1) and tyrosine kinase 2 (Tyk2), which, in turn, phosphorylate IFNAR1 and IFNAR2. The activated IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 induce the phosphorylation of the STAT family, which, along with IRF9, metastasize to the nucleus and increase the transcription of target genes [15], resulting in the activation of innate and adaptive immunity (Figure 1).
The expression of STING is inhibited in most tumors, which is tumor type specific. It has been demonstrated that STING has low expression in pancreatic cancer [16], and STING is gradually defected in colon adenocarcinoma from stage II to the advanced stage, as assessed by immunohistochemical staining and RNA analysis [17]. In malignant melanoma, the inhibition of STING is also related to the tumor stage [18]. According to the current research, the expression of STING is usually inhibited in most cancer types, rather than being upregulated, especially in advanced tumors [19]. When the cGAS-STING pathway in tumor cells is activated, cytokines such as IL-6 and type I IFN are induced, leading to tumor cell apoptosis or death. Moreover, the released dsDNA and other tumor-derived antigens can activate dendritic cells (DCs) and trigger anti-tumor immunity [20]. In addition, the tumor-derived DNA can be absorbed by DCs and induce a stronger adaptive anti-tumor immune response.
The cGAS-STING signaling pathway has a critical role in stimulating or enhancing innate and adaptive immunity through cytokines such as type I IFN, promoting the maturation and production of immune cells such as T cells, DCs, and NK cells to trigger effective anti-tumor immune effects [14,21] (Figure 2).
Type I IFN is a cluster of cytokines and is involved in immunomodulation, including 12 IFN-α subtypes, IFN-β, IFN-ε, IFN-κ, and IFN-ω [22]. Type I IFN enhances the production of cytotoxic T cells and improves the specific T cell responses in in vitro experiments [23]. Moreover, type I IFN promotes the stimulation and maturation of DCs, thus facilitating the recruitment of CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells [24]. In addition, type I IFN triggers the IFN effect signal pathway of DCs through the paracrine or autocrine, induces the production of MHC I and other co-stimulatory molecules (such as CD86), and promotes DC maturation and cross expression of tumor antigens. Then, mature DCs migrate to lymph nodes, activate CD8+ T cells, and promote anti-tumor cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) reaction [25,26]. Apart from this, type I IFN can initiate the immune response of NK cells and promote the cytotoxicity of NK cells to tumors [27]. In addition to immune cells, endothelial cells are also important targets of STING agonists. STING agonists can activate the signaling pathway and induce the generation of cytokines such as type I IFN to promote the normalization of the tumor vascular system and tumor microenvironment. Especially when used in combination with antiangiogenic agents, STING agonists can produce more effective anti-tumor outcomes and synergistically improve the efficacy of antiangiogenic agents [28]. Furthermore, the cGAS-STING signaling pathway is reported to be effective in the defense against intracellular DNA and RNA viruses [29,30]. It was demonstrated that cGAS-STING signaling is vital for the host defense against virus infection, as proved by the evidence that fibroblasts and bone marrow-derived macrophages from cGAS−/− mice were defective in IFN-β production and viral clearance during DNA virus MHV68 infection, and cGAS−/− mice were also more susceptible to RNA virus lethal infections [31]. It is possible that DNA from host cells destroyed by viruses may activate the STING pathway for the host defense, and the induction of type I IFNs and ISGs may provide protection against a large variety of microbial infections and improve immune responses [32]. These findings indicate that the STING signaling pathway has a crucial role in anti-tumor immune responses and improving the tumor microenvironment, which can be developed as adjuvants in cancer treatment.
On the contrary, stimulation of the cGAS-STING pathway may result in tumor development and metastasis as well. Investigations have demonstrated that activation of the STING signaling pathway causes indolamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO)-dependent effector T cell inhibition, promotes regulatory T cells (Tregs) activity, and induces immune tolerance, leading to tumor growth [33]. It was also elucidated that STING stimulation causes an enhanced increase in brain metastatic cells [34]. Moreover, STING activation could be restrained by gene mutations or gene silencing of STING or cGAS. For instance, KRAS- and LKB1-mutated epigenetic silencing of STING leads to facilitated immune escape in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells [35]. Thus, considering the potential opposite function after activating STING, the balance between the cancer immune response and tumor immune evasion, the treatment window, and possible side effects should be considered. The anti-tumor and tumorigenic effects of the STING pathway in different cells and microenvironments need to be evaluated before use as an anti-tumor treatment. When the cGAS-STING signaling pathway is combined with the immune checkpoint blocking therapy (such as PD-L1, PD-1, CTLA-4 inhibitors), it may promote the clinical application of the STING activation strategy.

3. Activation of STING Applied to Cancer Immunotherapy

Since the cGAS-STING pathway has a vital role in immunomodulation against tumorigenesis and cancer development, the activation of STING is expected to be used in cancer immunotherapy. Investigations have demonstrated that appropriate strategies can be selected according to the pathological conditions of the tumor to trigger the STING pathway and promote anti-tumor effects. The activation strategies of the cGAS-STING signaling pathway mainly refer to STING agonists, radiotherapy, and chemotherapeutic drugs.

3.1. STING Agonists

The cGAS-STING pathway is particularly important for innate immune sensing of immunogenic tumors. Activation of the cGAS-STING pathway can promote the maturation of antigen-presenting cells (APCs), induce the generation of cytokines and the production of CD8+ T cells against tumor antigens [36], and, at last, reshape the tumor microenvironment and enhance the anti-tumor immune response. Small molecules that activate the cGAS-STING pathway can promote the anticancer effect. STING agonists are mainly divided into 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA), cyclic dinucleotides (CDNs) and their derivatives, and other small molecule agonists.

3.1.1. DMXAA

DMXAA, also named ASA404, is a STING agonist from the analog of flavone 8-acetic acid, which was originally used in pre-clinical trials as a vascular disrupting agent [37]. DMXAA was found to directly interact with STING and was demonstrated to be effective in potentiating the anti-tumor effect in mice models [38]. A single-arm phase II study investigated the safety and possibility of DMXAA (ASA404) combined with the standard therapy of carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC. The combination was well-tolerated and resulted in no cardiac adverse events or other side effects, which demonstrated improvements in efficacy variables and survival of advanced NSCLC [39]. However, when the scheme was tested in the subsequent phase III clinical trial, no effect was found in the survival and progression-free survival in the DMXAA treatment groups compared with the placebo groups in patients with advanced NSCLC [40]. Unfortunately, human STING cannot be activated by DMXAA. This result is converse to pre-clinical investigation in mice models, in which DMXAA induced significant innate immune responses and potent anti-tumor effects in mice [36,38]. Scientists are still seeking resolutions of DMXAA in the human body. Mechanistically, DMXAA can stimulate the production of NF-κB in endothelial cells [41] and tumor cells [42]. Accumulated NF-κB signals might induce the generation of inflammatory cytokines, modulating immune responses in the tumor microenvironment. The possibility is that DMXAA could promote the translocation of phosphorylated IRF dimers to the nucleus while also stimulating NF-κB targets [43].

3.1.2. CDNs and Derivatives

CDNs, another kind of STING agonist, are a cluster of cyclic dinucleotide family, which can trigger the STING pathway directly. CDNs are derived from bacteria, mainly comprising cyclic di-GMP (c-di-GMP), cyclic di-AMP (c-di-AMP), and cyclic AMP-GMP (cGAMP) molecules. The potential anti-tumor effect was first proved in c-di-GMP, which effectively suppressed both basal and growth factor-induced proliferation in human colon carcinoma H508 cells in vitro [44]. It was subsequently elucidated that CDNs are an essential inducer in activating the host immune response [45,46,47]. For example, intraperitoneal injection of low-dose c-di-GMP resulted in eradication of metastases in a metastatic breast cancer mouse model by enhancing the generation of IL-12 and promoting the immune response of CD8+ T cells. Meanwhile, treatment with high-dose c-di-GMP induced the production of caspase-3 and resulted in cancer cell apoptosis [48]. Moreover, intratumoral administration of c-di-GMP improved the survival rate of glioma-bearing mice and promoted type I IFN signaling and CCL5, CXCL10, and T cell migration in the tumor environment [49]. cGAMP is also a commonly used CDNs, which can stimulate the immune system by activating the cGAS-STING pathway [50,51]. 2′3′-cGAMP is a genuine natural CDN. Intratumoral vaccination of 2′3′-cGAMP in multiple mice models, such as 4T1 murine breast cancer, HSC-2 squamous cell carcinomas, CT26 murine colon cancer, and B16F10 murine melanoma, resulted in a transient increase in macrophages in the tumor and enhanced expression of TNFα and chemokines in the tumor microenvironment [50,52]. Co-injection of cGAMP with PD-1 or CTLA-4 inhibitor exhibited an enhanced anti-tumor effect and increased tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cell responses in a mouse model of melanoma and an ex vivo model of cultured human melanoma explants [52,53]. Co-administration of 2′,3′-cGAMP, E7GRG (HPV 16 E7 protein), and CpG-C adjuvant in a mouse model of cervical cancer led to an enhanced suppression of tumor growth and metastasis [54]. In addition, treatment of 3′3′-cGAMP in mice with lymphocytic leukemia or myeloma caused significant cancer cell apoptosis and tumor inhibition, indicating the potential of 3′3′-cGAMP in immunomodulation [55]. Furthermore, 3′3′-cGAMP administration resulted in prolonged production of STING in the ER or Golgi apparatus in malignant B cell tumors [55]. Taken together, these results suggest the essential role of STING agonists in anti-tumor immunity and cancer immunotherapy. Agonists of STING such as c-di-GMP have been successfully used as cancer adjuvants, and cGAMP was proved to be effective in enhancing the anti-tumor effect when combined with radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) [53,56,57].
Apart from classic CDNs, derivative CDNs have emerged with an improved performance, which mainly include ADU-S100, MK-1454, SB-11285, ADU-V19, IACS-8779, IACS-8803, and IMSA101.
ADU-S100 (MIW815) was the first CDN agent to be applied in clinical trials of cancer immunotherapy, with enhanced stability and lipophilicity. It was demonstrated that treatment with ADU-S100 resulted in a significant inhibition of tumor growth in mice and led to improved systemic immune responses to decrease far-away metastasis and prolong the immunologic memory in B16 melanoma, CT26 colon cancer, and 4T1 breast cancer models [36]. ADU-S100 combined with PD-L1 modulator and OX40 receptor is effective in activating the innate immunity and conquering the immune tolerance of antigen, in which intratumoral injection of ADU-S100 effectively activates tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cell responses [58]. Moreover, ADU-S100 could potently prime the production of type I IFN, thus reducing abnormal tumor vasculature formation and promoting the expression of CD8+ T cells, and thereby inhibiting the tumor formation. In addition, ADU-S100/MIW815 was investigated in clinical studies. In a phase I clinical trial (NCT02675439), the safety of intratumoral administration of ADU-S100 was assessed in 40 patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors or lymphomas, and no toxicity to hosts were reported [59]. Treatment of ADU-S100 plus the PD-1 inhibitor spartalizumab was investigated in a phase Ib clinical trial (NCT03172936) to characterize the safety and scientific validity of the combination in patients diagnosed with advanced/metastatic solid tumors or lymphomas [60]. Moreover, co-injection of ADU-S100 and pembrolizumab was studied in patients with PD-L1-positive recurrent or metastatic HNSCC (NCT03937141), and the combination of ADU-S100 with ipilimumab was tested clinically in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors or lymphomas (NCT02675439).
MK-1454 is a synthetic CDN derivative with an advanced performance. The prior phase I study (NCT03010176) on MK-1454 demonstrated good activity and safety in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphomas when injected with MK-1454 alone or in combination with ICI pembrolizumab [61]. Moreover, intratumoral administration of MK-1454 individually or combined with pembrolizumab was assessed in patients with metastatic or unresectable recurrent HNSCC (NCT04220866).
SB-11285 is a CDN derivative STING agonist. It was proved in a pre-clinical study that intratumoral treatment of SB11285 leads to sufficient suppression of tumor growth in mice. Moreover, co-administration of SB11285 with cyclophosphamide had a synergistic anti-tumor effect and promoted the immune responses [62]. Furthermore, intravenous injection of SB11285 alone or in combination with Atezolizumab was evaluated in a phase 1a/1b study patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT04096638). This investigation aimed to prove the anti-tumor activity of intravenous SB11285 as an adjuvant and determine the dose-limiting toxicities and tolerated dose of SB11285.
ADU-V19 is a modified human STING agonist. As a CDN analog, ADU-V19 has similar efficacies to those of CDN STING agonists, which can activate type I IFN and induce T cell responses [63].
IACS-8779 and IACS-8803 are derived from CDN STING agonists that are highly efficient in activating the STING pathway in vitro. Intratumoral injection of IACS-8779 or IACS-8803 in mice with B16 melanoma tumors led to a robust systemic anti-tumor efficacy [64].
IMSA101 is a cGAMP analog whose structure has not been reported. In order to investigate the safety and clinical efficacy of IMSA101, it was evaluated individually and combined with ICI in phase I/IIa studies (NCT04020185) of patients with solid or refractory malignancies.

3.1.3. Non-CDN Agonists

Other small-molecule agonists mainly refer to non-CDNs. E7766 pertains to the kind of STING agonists with a macrocycle bridge, which may match both human and mouse STING protein. It was proved that administration of E7766 (i.t.) in mice led to a significant reduction in subcutaneous tumor growth [65]. Treatment with E7766 (i.v.) demonstrated enhanced IFN-β gene induction and tumor inhibition in a dose-dependent manner in mice with BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer [66]. Moreover, injection of E7766 led to 90% tumor regression in mice bearing CT26 tumors with no recrudescence for 8 months [67]. In addition, the clinical efficacy of E7766 was also assessed in a phase 1/1b clinical trial, in which treatment with E7766 (i.t.) is regarded as a monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphomas (NCT04144140) and in patients diagnosed with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NCT04109092). MK-2118 is a STING agonist with an unknown structure. In order to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and MTD of MK-2118, its was tested in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphomas (NCT03249792) and administrated intratumorally or subcutaneously, alone or in combination with pembrolizumab. Moreover, amidobenzimidazole (ABZI)-based analogs were designed to improve systemic delivery, which can bind to the C-terminal domain of STING and enhance the biding affinity. The representative one is diABZI from linked ABZIs, which showed a potent effect in ameliorating the affinity to STING and inducing the secretion of IFN-β in human PBMCs. Administration of diABZI in mice bearing CT26 colorectal tumors resulted in significant tumor inhibition and enhanced survival, with 80% of mice being tumor free [68]. Compound 3, an ABZI-based compound, can trigger STING and produce IFN-β, suppress CT26 colorectal tumor growth in mice, and improve the survival rate by enhancing T cell immune responses [68]. MSA-2, an orally available small-molecule STING agonist, was demonstrated to be effective in inducing tumor regression in mice with durable anti-tumor immunity and activating IFN-β secretion in various syngeneic murine tumor models [69]. In recent studies, JNJ-‘6196 has been projected to be the next-generation STING agonist, which can trigger DCs and induce the production of cytokines with high potency. Treatment with JNJ- ‘6196 in mice resulted in tumor regression, improved immune resistance, and enhanced ICI effects in PD-1 non-responsive tumor models [70]. The efficacy of JNJ-‘6196 in synergistically improving the effects of ICI makes it a potent adjuvant for clinical treatments.

3.1.4. Bacterial Vectors

Apart from the above STING agonists, bacterial vectors are considered as novel delivery approaches for STING agonists to transform into specific cells. One vector is SYNB1891, which is localized to the tumor microenvironment and expresses the enzymes to generated c-di-AMP. Intratumoral injection of SYNB1891 in mice bearing B16.F10 melanoma tumors resulted in the generation of type I IFNs and tumor regression [71]. Moreover, the anti-tumor efficacy of intratumoral SYNB1891 is also being tested in an ongoing phase I clinical trial of patients diagnosed with advanced/metastatic solid tumors and lymphoma (NCT04167137). Another bacterial vector is STACT, which carries an inhibitory microRNA to TREX-1 (inhibiting the STING pathway). Scientific studies have demonstrated that treatment with STACT-TREX-1 resulted in specific colonization of the myeloid [72] and tumor regression and durable immunity in CT26 and MC38 murine models [73].

3.1.5. STING Agonists in Clinical Trials

The cGAS-STING pathway can activate type I IFN and have crucial roles in anti-tumor immunity. STING agonists targeting the signaling pathway have demonstrated great potential in improving the tumor environment, enhancing the anti-tumor immune response, and promoting anti-tumor effects. Thus, the STING agonists that have been applied in important clinical trials are summarized in Table 1 [74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86], administrated alone or in combination with other cancer therapies. The clinical trials are indicated on the website https://ClinicalTrials.gov (accessed on 18 June 2022).

3.2. Radiotherapy

Radiotherapy usually causes the destruction of nuclear and gene instability in cancer cells [87], and the accumulated tumor pathological DNA in the cytoplasm may activate the cGAS-STING signal pathway, and then induce congenital immunity and promote the adaptive immune response. Recent studies have proved that radiotherapy treatment and the resulting anti-tumor efficacy is closely related to the activation of the cGAS-STING pathway and production of type I IFN. Treatment with cGAMP could greatly improve the activation of the cGAS-STING pathway. Deng et al. illustrated that mice with a STING or cGAS deficiency were not activated by a valid dose of radiation, and DCs could not be induced by type I IFN, even after radiotherapy treatment. They also proved that the cGAS-STING-dependent cytoplasmic DNA sensing pathway is necessary for a radiation-activated anti-tumor adaptive immune response [88]. However, whether radiotherapy induces cGAS-STING-mediated anti-tumor effects or not is related to the applied radiation dose. The dose of radiation is vital for STING pathway activation. It has been demonstrated that low-dose radiation may trigger insufficient biological responses while overdosed radiation may cause adverse effects [89,90]. In addition, Luo et al. demonstrated that the enhancement of the T cell response by radiotherapy and nanovaccine is STING dependent. In STING-mutant or -deficient mice, the anti-tumor effect of this strategy is greatly reduced [91]. In a mouse model of homologous melanoma or neuroblastoma, the nanovaccine combined with radiotherapy also activated DCs and effector T cells, resulting in obvious tumor regression and specific anti-tumor immune memory [92]. A kind of liposome nanoparticle loaded with cGAMP in combination with radiotherapy triggered the generation of type I IFN in APC and resulted in specific anti-tumor feedback in a mouse model of lung metastasis [93].

3.3. Chemotherapeutic Drugs

Many anti-tumor chemotherapeutic drugs are cytotoxic and may destroy chromosomal DNA. When damaged DNA fragments accumulate in the cytoplasm and are recognized by cGAS, a type I IFN reaction is triggered to produce immune regulation. The chemotherapies etoposide and cisplatin can induce intrinsic STING-dependent cytokine production through DNA damage. It was demonstrated that etoposide activated the STING pathway via the production of DNA adducts of ssDNA and dsDNA, and cisplatin can interfere with DNA repair, cause DNA damage, and trigger the STING pathway [94]. Grabosch et al. evaluated the tumor immunogenicity and in vivo anti-tumor effect of cisplatin in two new mouse models of ovarian cancer, when used as monotherapy or combination therapy with PD-L1 inhibitors. It was found that acute and chronic exposure to cisplatin leads to the accumulation of T cells in tumors and causes an increase in the expression level of calreticulin, MHC I, and other molecules during the process of antigen presentation [95]. In addition, it was also demonstrated that long-term exposure to DNA-damaging substances leads to nucleosome leakage and triggers STING-dependent cytoplasmic DNA signal transduction [96]. Moreover, Li et al. proved that co-administration of cGAMP and 5-FU can significantly suppress tumor growth in mice, improve the survival rate, and significantly alleviate the toxicity and side effects of intestinal epithelial tissue damage and mucosal atrophy caused by 5-FU in a mouse colon cancer model [51].

4. Combination of STING Agonists with Other Cancer Therapies

The activation of the cGAS-STING pathway may induce various cytokines and stimulate adaptive immunity. When STING agonists are combined with other cancer therapies, it might achieve positive feedback, improve the tumor microenvironment, and lead to a sustained anti-tumor effect [97].

4.1. STING Agonists and Chemotherapies

Chemotherapy, as a cancer therapy, may induce damaged ssDNA or dsDNA accumulation, which could trigger the signaling pathway of cGAS-STING and enhance T cell response [98]. It was elucidated that administration of phosphatidylserine loaded with cGAMP-adenosine monophosphate (NP-cGAMP) resulted in rapid spread of NP-cGAMP to specific sites, activation of the cGAS-STING pathway and production of type I IFN, and inhibition of lung metastasis in mouse models [83]. Moreover, when 5-FU was combined with cGAMP, the combination demonstrated improved innate immune responses, enhanced anti-tumor efficacies, and reduced the side effects of 5-FU as well [44]. Furthermore, the anthracycline antibiotics, such as adriamycin, can activate the production of IFN and trigger the cGAS-STING pathway [99].

4.2. STING Agonists and Radiotherapy

Radiation-induced DNA damage can trigger the cGAS-STING pathway and induce T cell responses [88], and the combination of radiotherapy with STING agonists produces a better synergistic anti-tumor effect. Xue et al. found that the STING agonist diABZI enhanced the radiosensitivity of NSCLC cells to irradiation via stimulation of the cGAS-STING pathway and promotion of apoptosis [100]. Moreover, it was demonstrated in two mouse models that the combination of local radiation and PC7A nanovaccine could synergistically activate the STING signal transduction pathway and lead to a better therapeutic anti-tumor efficacy, which significantly improved the immunosuppression and survival time in tumor-bearing mice. In addition, the enhancement of the T cell response by radiotherapy and nanovaccine is STING dependent, and this strategy could not work or was reduced in STING-mutant or -deficient mice [91]. In a mouse model of homologous melanoma or neuroblastoma, a nanovaccine with a PC7A/CPG composite nucleus combined with radiotherapy activated DCs and effector T cells, inducing obvious tumor inhibition and specific anti-tumor immune memory [92]. A kind of liposome nanoparticle loaded with cGAMP in combination with radiotherapy could inhibit lung metastasis of 4T1 breast cancer [93]. Jagodinsky et al. demonstrated that targeted radionuclide therapies (TRTs) can potently stimulate type I IFN, which is vital for the combination of TRT with immunotherapies [101].

4.3. STING Agonists and Immunotherapy

STING agonists can activate the cGAS-STING pathway, induce the expression of type I IFN, improve the tumor environment, and lead to promoted anti-tumor effects [102]. These characteristics make STING agonists an ideal candidate for combination with ICI (such as anti-PD-1/PD-L1, CTLA-4 antibodies) [103,104], which only work in a fraction of patients with good anti-tumor effects.
It was demonstrated that treatment with cGAMP (i.m.) at a site far away from the tumor could significantly promote the therapeutic effect of immune-checkpoint-blocking. cGAMP, which, combined with PD-L1 antibody, effectively suppressed tumor growth in mice bearing a B16 melanoma tumor [105] while STING-deficient mice showed a weak response to immune-blocking. Ager et al. proved that STING agonist combined with PD-1 inhibitors showed an enhanced anti-tumor effect, especially in tumor models with a poor response to ICI [106]. When nanoparticles loaded with CDNs and PD-1 inhibitor were treated in established B16 melanoma tumors in vivo, the integrated nanoparticles presented a log-fold improvement in the anti-tumor potency compared with free CDN without nanoparticles [107]. Moreover, a vaccine PancVAX-targeted neoantigen, combined with the STING agonist ADU-V16, resulted in stimulation of the T cell repertoire and led to temporary tumor rejection in mice burdened with pancreatic (Panc02) tumors.
When PancVAX was co-administrated with two ICIs (anti-PD-1 and agonist OX40 antibodies), it promoted tumor inhibition and prolonged the survival benefit [63]. Co-treatment of STING agonists with CTLA4 and PD-1 antibodies resulted in a significant survival advantage in a preclinical HPV + oral tumor model when compared with no treatment or treatment with ICI only [108]. In addition, Nakamura et al., found that treatment with STING-LNP (a lipid nanoparticle containing STING agonist) could reverse PD-1 resistance in a mouse model with B16-F10 lung metastasis. Mechanistically, NK cells can be stimulated by the STING pathway, which, in turn, promotes the production of PD-L1 in cancer cells [109]. Apart from that, CAR T cells generated from Th/Tc17 cells together with the STING agonists DMXAA or cGAMP significantly improve tumor control and prolong CAR T cell persistence in the tumor microenvironment in breast cancer [110]. Furthermore, cGAMP was evaluated to be effective in activating NK cells and enhancing the sensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells to NK cells. The integration of CAR-NK-92 cells targeting mesothelin and cGAMP presented better anti-tumor effects compared with individual treatment in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer by improving tumor control and promoting survival [111]. Co-administration of c-di-GMP and a Listeria monocytogenes-based vaccine was also demonstrated to be effective in decreasing the number of MDSCs in blood and inhibiting tumor growth and metastases, indicating the potent prospect of c-di-GMP application as an adjuvant against cancer [48].
STING agonists combined with other drugs have good application prospects, and some combined therapies have entered clinical trials. The efficacy of the STING agonist ADU-S100 combined with the PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab has been clinically tested in head and neck cancer (NCT03937141); ADU-S100 integrated with ipilimumab was assessed in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors or lymphomas (NCT02675439). Moreover, co-administration of ADU-S100 and the PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor PDR001 has also been used in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors or lymphomas. In addition, another clinical trial of intratumoral injection of MK-1454 combined with intravenous injection of pembrolizumab is under way, as assessed in patients with metastatic or unresectable recurrent HNSCC.

5. Conclusions and Future Directions

The cGAS-STING signaling pathway is an important process in cytoplasmic DNA sensing, and has critical roles in regulating pathogen infection, tumor immunity, and autoimmune diseases. Activation of the cGAS-STING pathway can induce the expression of type I IFNs and other cytokines, and conduct the signals to the nucleus, which makes the cGAS-STING pathway a promising target for cancer immunotherapy. Effective STING agonists can improve the tumor microenvironment immunity and enhance the anti-tumor effect. Recently, STING agonists have been investigated in pre-clinical scientific studies and clinical trials. It has been demonstrated that STING agonists have promising biological activity and show excellent synergistic anti-tumor effects in combination with other cancer therapies such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or immune therapies, as proven in preclinical studies and some clinical trials. The combination of STING agonists with ICIs (PD-1 inhibitor or CTLA-4 antibody) has presented significant synergistic anti-tumor effects in several tumor models, and the clinical efficacy of STING agonists integrated with PD-1 antibody is under investigation in patients for cancer immunotherapy.
Even though STING agonists have demonstrated good application prospects, the clinical application of the cGAS-STING signal pathway in cancer treatment is limited at present. Given the complexity of the immune network and safety problems, attention should be given to the treatment window, toxicity, and side effects of STING-activation-based combination therapy to promote therapeutic efficacies and avoid excessive activation of the STING pathway. In summary, the cGAS-STING pathway has great potential in cancer immunotherapy as it improves the immune ability and facilitates the combined cancer biotherapeutic efficacies. In-depth research on the clinical application of STING agonists will not only deepen the understanding of innate and adaptive immunity and help to develop more effective STING agonists as anti-tumor drugs but also provide a theoretical basis for the anti-tumor immunotherapy strategy and its combined applications.

Author Contributions

K.L. provided the idea and wrote the manuscript. N.L. and W.Y. searched the literature. H.G. and X.L. were involved in the figure and table making. B.C. illustrated the figures and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [82104457] and Shenzhen Longhua District Science and Technology Innovation Fund [SZLHQJCYJ2021001].

Institutional Review Board Statement

The review was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Academic Committee of the Affiliated Shenzhen Longhua Hospital of Southern Medical University (No. LHYYLW2022025, 19 June 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare that there are no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brubaker:, S.W.; Bonham, K.S.; Zanoni, I.; Kagan, J.C. Innate immune pattern recognition: A cell biological perspective. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2015, 33, 257–290. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hopfner, K.P.; Hornung, V. Molecular mechanisms and cellular functions of cGAS-STING signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 501–521. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ishikawa, H.; Barber, G.N. STING is an endoplasmic reticulum adaptor that facilitates innate immune signalling. Nature 2008, 455, 674–678. [Google Scholar]
  4. Su, T.; Zhang, Y.; Valerie, K.; Wang, X.Y.; Lin, S.; Zhu, G. STING activation in cancer immunotherapy. Theranostics 2019, 9, 7759–7771. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhong, B.; Yang, Y.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.Y.; Li, Y.; Diao, F.; Lei, C.; He, X.; Zhang, L.; Tien, P.; et al. The adaptor protein MITA links virus-sensing receptors to IRF3 transcription factor activation. Immunity 2008, 29, 538–550. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ishikawa, H.; Ma, Z.; Barber, G.N. STING regulates intracellular DNA-mediated type I interferon-dependent innate immunity. Nature 2009, 461, 788–792. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sun, L.; Wu, J.; Du, F.; Chen, X.; Chen, Z.J. Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is a cytosolic DNA sensor that activates the type I interferon pathway. Science 2013, 339, 786–791. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wu, J.; Sun, L.; Chen, X.; Du, F.; Shi, H.; Chen, C.; Chen, Z.J. Cyclic GMP-AMP is an endogenous second messenger in innate immune signaling by cytosolic DNA. Science 2013, 339, 826–830. [Google Scholar]
  9. Genoveso, M.J.; Hisaoka, M.; Komatsu, T.; Wodrich, H. Formation of adenovirus DNA replication compartments and viral DNA accumulation sites by host chromatin regulatory proteins including NPM1. FEBS J. 2020, 287, 205–217. [Google Scholar]
  10. Takahashi, A.; Loo, T.M.; Okada, R.; Kamachi, F.; Watanabe, Y.; Wakita, M.; Watanabe, S. Downregulation of cytoplasmic DNases is implicated in cytoplasmic DNA accumulation and SASP in senescent cells. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1249. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gao, P.; Ascano, M.; Wu, Y.; Barchet, W.; Gaffney, B.L.; Zillinger, T.; Serganov, A.A.; Liu, Y.Z.; Jones, R.A.; Hartmann, G.; et al. Cyclic [G(2′,5′)pA(3′,5′) p] is the metazoan second messenger produced by DNA-activated cyclic GMP-AMP synthase. Cell 2013, 153, 1094–1107. [Google Scholar]
  12. Tao, J.; Zhou, X.; Jiang, Z. cGAS-cGAMP-STING: The three musketeers of cytosolic DNA sensing and signaling. IUBMB Life 2016, 68, 858–870. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kang, J.; Wu, J.; Liu, Q.; Wu, X.; Zhao, Y.; Ren, J. Post-Translational Modifications of STING: A Potential Therapeutic Target. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 888147. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gajewski, T.F.; Schreiber, H.; Fu, Y.X. Innate and adaptive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Nat. Immunol. 2013, 14, 1014–1022. [Google Scholar]
  15. Corrales, L.; Matson, V.; Flood, B.; Spranger, S.; Gajewski, T.F. Innate immune signaling and regulation in cancer immunotherapy. Cell Res. 2017, 27, 96–108. [Google Scholar]
  16. Baird, J.R.; Friedman, D.; Cottam, B.; Dubensky, T.W., Jr.; Kanne, D.B.; Bambina, S.; Bahjat, K.; Crittenden, M.R.; Gough, M.J. Radiotherapy combined with novel STING-Targeting oligonucleotides results in regression of established tumors. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 50–61. [Google Scholar]
  17. Xia, T.; Konno, H.; Ahn, J.; Barber, G.N. Deregulation of STING signaling in colorectal carcinoma constrains DNA damage responses and correlates with tumorigenesis. Cell Rep. 2016, 14, 282–297. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ma, M.; Ghosh, S.; Tavernari, D.; Katarkar, A.; Clocchiatti, A.; Mazzeo, L.; Samarkina, A.; Epiney, J.; Yu, Y.R.; Ho, P.C.; et al. Sustained androgen receptor signaling is a determinant of melanoma cell growth potential and tumorigenesis. J. Exp. Med. 2021, 218, e20201137. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wayne, J.; Brooks, T.; Landras, A.; Massey, A.J. Targeting DNA damage response pathways to activate the STING innate immune signaling pathway in human cancer cells. FEBS J. 2021, 288, 4507–4540. [Google Scholar]
  20. Fuertes, M.B.; Woo, S.R.; Burnett, B.; Fu, Y.X.; Gajewski, T.F. Type I interferon response and innate immune sensing of cancer. Trends Immunol. 2013, 34, 67–73. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gonzalez-Navajas, J.M.; Lee, J.; David, M.; Raz, E. Immunomodulatory functions of type I interferons. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 12, 125–135. [Google Scholar]
  22. Schreiber, G.; Piehler, J. The molecular basis for functional plasticity in type I interferon signaling. Trends Immunol. 2015, 36, 139–149. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tough, D.F. Modulation of T-cell function by type I interferon. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2012, 90, 492–497. [Google Scholar]
  24. Longhi, M.P.; Trumpfheller, C.; Idoyaga, J.; Caskey, M.; Matos, I.; Kluger, C.; Salazar, A.M.; Colonna, M.; Steinman, R.M. Dendritic cells require a systemic type I interferon response to mature and induce CD4+ Th1 immunity with poly IC as adjuvant. J. Exp. Med. 2009, 206, 1589–1602. [Google Scholar]
  25. Corrales, L.; McWhirter, S.M.; Dubensky, T.W., Jr.; Gajewski, T.F. The host STING pathway at the interface of cancer and immunity. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 2404–2411. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhu, Y.; An, X.; Zhang, X.; Qiao, Y.; Zheng, T.; Li, X. STING: A master regulator in the cancer-immunity cycle. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 152. [Google Scholar]
  27. Marcus, A.; Mao, A.J.; Lensink-Vasan, M.; Wang, L.; Vance, R.E.; Raulet, D.H. Tumor-Derived cGAMP triggers a STING-mediated interferon response in non-tumor cells to activate the NK cell response. Immunity 2018, 49, 754–763. [Google Scholar]
  28. Yang, H.; Lee, W.S.; Kong, S.J.; Kim, C.G.; Kim, J.H.; Chang, S.K.; Kim, S.; Kim, G.; Chon, H.J.; Kim, C. STING activation reprograms tumor vasculatures and synergizes with VEGFR2 blockade. J. Clin. Investig. 2019, 130, 4350–4364. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ablasser, A.; Chen, Z.J. cGAS in action: Expanding roles in immunity and inflammation. Science 2019, 363, eaat8657. [Google Scholar]
  30. Cai, X.; Chiu, Y.H.; Chen, Z.J. The cGAS-cGAMP-STING pathway of cytosolic DNA sensing and signaling. Mol. Cell. 2014, 54, 289–296. [Google Scholar]
  31. Schoggins, J.W.; Macduff, D.A.; Imanaka, N.; Gainey, M.D.; Shrestha, B.; Eitson, J.L.; Mar, K.B.; Richardson, R.B.; Ratushny, A.V.; Litvak, V.; et al. Pan-viral specificity of IFN-induced genes reveals new roles for cGAS in innate immunity. Nature 2014, 505, 691–695. [Google Scholar]
  32. Gough, D.J.; Messina, N.L.; Clarke, C.J.; Johnstone, R.W.; Levy, D.E. Constitutive type I interferon modulates homeostatic balance through tonic signaling. Immunity 2012, 36, 166–174. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lemos, H.; Mohamed, E.; Huang, L.; Ou, R.; Pacholczyk, G.; Arbab, A.S.; Munn, D.; Mellor, A.L. STING promotes the growth of tumors characterized by low antigenicity via IDO activation. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 2076–2081. [Google Scholar]
  34. Chen, Q.; Boire, A.; Jin, X.; Valiente, M.; Er, E.E.; Lopez-Soto, A.; Jacob, L.; Patwa, R.; Shah, H.; Xu, K.; et al. Carcinoma-astrocyte gap junctions promote brain metastasis by cGAMP transfer. Nature 2016, 533, 493–498. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kitajima, S.; Ivanova, E.; Guo, S.; Yoshida, R.; Campisi, M.; Sundararaman, S.K.; Tange, S.; Mitsuishi, Y.; Thai, T.C.; Masuda, S.; et al. Suppression of STING Associated with LKB1 Loss in KRAS-Driven Lung Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2019, 9, 34–45. [Google Scholar]
  36. Corrales, L.; Glickman, L.H.; McWhirter, S.M.; Kanne, D.B.; Sivick, K.E.; Katibah, G.E.; Woo, S.R.; Lemmens, E.; Banda, T.; Leong, J.J.; et al. Direct activation of STING in the tumor microenvironment leads to potent and systemic tumor regression and immunity. Cell Rep. 2015, 11, 1018–1030. [Google Scholar]
  37. Cui, X.; Zhang, R.; Cen, S.; Zhou, J. STING modulators: Predictive significance in drug discovery. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 182, 111591. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kanwar, J.R.; Kanwar, R.K.; Pandey, S.; Ching, L.M.; Krissansen, G.W. Vascular attack by 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid combined with B7.1 (CD80)-mediated immunotherapy overcomes immune resistance and leads to the eradication of large tumors and multiple tumor foci. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 1948–1956. [Google Scholar]
  39. McKeage, M.J.; Reck, M.; Jameson, M.B.; Rosenthal, M.A.; Gibbs, D.; Mainwaring, P.N.; Freitag, L.; Sullivan, R.; Von Pawel, J. Phase II study of ASA404 (vadimezan, 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid/DMXAA) 1800 mg/m2 combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel in previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2009, 65, 192–197. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lara, P.N., Jr.; Douillard, J.Y.; Nakagawa, K.; Pawel, J.V.; McKeage, M.J.; Albert, I.; Losonczy, G.; Reck, M.; Heo, D.S.; Fan, X.L.; et al. Randomized phase III placebo-controlled trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without the vascular disrupting agent vadimezan (ASA404) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 2965–2971. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ching, L.M.; Cao, Z.; Kieda, C.; Zwain, S.; Jameson, M.B.; Baguley, B.C. Induction of endothelial cell apoptosis by the antivascular agent 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid. Br. J. Cancer. 2002, 86, 1937–1942. [Google Scholar]
  42. Woon, S.; Baguley, B.C.; Palmer, B.D.; Fraser, J.D.; Ching, L. Uptake of the Antivascular agent 5,6-Dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA) and activation of NF-κB in human tumor cell lines. Oncol. Res. 2002, 13, 95–101. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang, Y.; Luo, J.; Alu, A.; Han, X.; Wei, Y.; Wei, X. cGAS-STING pathway in cancer biotherapy. Mol. Cancer 2020, 19, 136. [Google Scholar]
  44. Karaolis, D.K.; Cheng, K.R.; Lipsky, M.; Elnabawi, A.; Catalano, J.; Hyodo, M.; Hayakawa, Y.; Raufman, J.P. 3′,5′-Cyclic diguanylic acid (c-di-GMP) inhibits basal and growth factor-stimulated human colon cancer cell proliferation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 329, 40–45. [Google Scholar]
  45. Karaolis, D.K.; Means, T.K.; Yang, D.; Takahashi, M.; Yoshimura, T.; Muraille, E.; Philpott, D.; Schroeder, J.T.; Hyodo, M.; Hayakawa, Y.; et al. Bacterial c-di-GMP is an immunostimulatory molecule. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 2171–2181. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ogunniyi, A.D.; Paton, J.C.; Kirby, A.C.; McCullers, J.A.; Cook, J.; Hyodo, M.; Hayakawa, Y.; Karaolis, D.K. c-di-GMP is an effective immunomodulator and vaccine adjuvant against pneumococcal infection. Vaccine 2008, 26, 4676–4685. [Google Scholar]
  47. Dubensky, T.W.; Kanne, D.B., Jr.; Leong, M.L. Rationale, progress and development of vaccines utilizing STING-activating cyclic dinucleotide adjuvants. Ther. Adv. Vaccines 2013, 1, 131–143. [Google Scholar]
  48. Chandra, D.; Quispe-Tintaya, W.; Jahangir, A.; Asafu-Adjei, D.; Ramos, I.; Sintim, H.O.; Zhou, J.; Hayakawa, Y.; Karaolis, D.K.; Gravekamp, C. STING ligand c-di-GMP improves cancer vaccination against metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2014, 2, 901–910. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ohkuri, T.; Ghosh, A.; Kosaka, A.; Zhu, J.; Ikeura, M.; David, M.; Watkins, S.C.; Sarkar, S.N.; Okada, H. STING contributes to antiglioma immunity via triggering type I IFN signals in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014, 2, 1199–1208. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ohkuri, T.; Kosaka, A.; Ishibashi, K.; Kumai, T.; Hirata, Y.; Ohara, K.; Nagato, T.; Oikawa, K.; Aoki, N.; Harabuchi, Y.; et al. Intratumoral administration of cGAMP transiently accumulates potent macrophages for anti-tumor immunity at a mouse tumor site. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2017, 66, 705–716. [Google Scholar]
  51. Li, T.; Cheng, H.; Yuan, H.; Xu, Q.; Shu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, P.; Tan, J.; Rui, Y.; Li, P.; et al. Antitumor activity of cGAMP via stimulation of cGAS-cGAMP-STING-IRF3 mediated innate immune response. Sci Rep. 2016, 6, 19049. [Google Scholar]
  52. Demaria, O.; De Gassart, A.; Coso, S.; Gestermann, N.; Di Domizio, J.; Flatz, L.; Gaide, O.; Michielin, O.; Hwu, P.; Petrova, T.V.; et al. STING activation of tumor endothelial cells initiates spontaneous and therapeutic antitumor immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 15408–15413. [Google Scholar]
  53. Fu, J.; Kanne, D.B.; Leong, M.; Glickman, L.H.; McWhirter, S.M.; Lemmens, E.; Mechette, K.; Leong, J.J.; Lauer, P.; Liu, W.; et al. STING agonist formulated cancer vaccines can cure established tumors resistant to PD-1 blockade. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015, 7, 283ra52. [Google Scholar]
  54. Dorostkar, F.; Arashkia, A.; Roohvand, F.; Shoja, Z.; Navari, M.; Mashhadi Abolghasem Shirazi, M.; Shahosseini, Z.; Farahmand, M.; Nosrati, M.S.S.; Jalilvand, S. Co-administration of 2′3′-cGAMP STING activator and CpG-C adjuvants with a mutated form of HPV 16 E7 protein leads to tumor growth inhibition in the mouse model. Infect. Agent Cancer 2021, 16, 7. [Google Scholar]
  55. Tang, C.H.; Zundell, J.A.; Ranatunga, S.; Lin, C.; Nefedova, Y.; Del Valle, J.R.; Hu, C.C. Agonist-Mediated Activation of STING Induces Apoptosis in Malignant B Cells. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 2137–2152. [Google Scholar]
  56. Chen, W.; KuoLee, R.; Yan, H. The potential of 3’,5’-cyclic diguanylic acid (c-di-GMP) as an effective vaccine adjuvant. Vaccine 2010, 28, 3080–3085. [Google Scholar]
  57. Berger, G.; Marloye, M.; Lawler, S.E. Pharmacological Modulation of the STING Pathway for Cancer Immunotherapy. Trends Mol. Med. 2019, 25, 412–427. [Google Scholar]
  58. Foote, J.B.; Kok, M.; Leatherman, J.M.; Armstrong, T.D.; Marcinkowski, B.C.; Ojalvo, L.S.; Kanne, D.B.; Jaffee, E.M.; Dubensky, T.W., Jr.; Emens, L.A. A STING Agonist Given with OX40 Receptor and PD-L1 Modulators Primes Immunity and Reduces Tumor Growth in Tolerized Mice. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2017, 5, 468–479. [Google Scholar]
  59. Gogoi, H.; Mansouri, S.; Jin, L. The Age of Cyclic Dinucleotide Vaccine Adjuvants. Vaccines 2020, 8, 453. [Google Scholar]
  60. Meric-Bernstam, F.; Sandhu, S.K.; Hamid, O.; Spreafico, A.; Kasper, S.; Dummer, R.; Shimizu, T.; Steeghs, N.; Lewis, N.; Talluto, C.C.; et al. Phase Ib study of MIW815 (ADU-S100) in combination with spartalizumab (PDR001) in patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic solid tumors or lymphomas. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, 2507. [Google Scholar]
  61. Harrington, K.J.; Brody, J.; Ingham, M.; Strauss, J.; Cemerski, S.; Wang, M.; Tse, A.; Khilnani, A.; Marabelle, A.; Golan, T. Preliminary results of the first-in-human (FIH) study of MK-1454, an agonist of stimulator of interferon genes (STING), as monotherapy or in combination with pembrolizumab (pembro) in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphomas. Ann. Oncol. 2018, 29, viii712. [Google Scholar]
  62. Challa, S.V.; Zhou, S.; Sheri, A.; Padmanabhan, S.; Meher, G.; Gimi, R.; Schmidt, D.; Cleary, D.; Afdhal, N.; Iyer, R. Preclinical studies of SB 11285, a novel STING agonist for immuno-oncology. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 35, e14616. [Google Scholar]
  63. Kinkead, H.L.; Hopkins, A.; Lutz, E.; Wu, A.A.; Yarchoan, M.; Cruz, K.; Woolman, S.; Vithayathil, T.; Glickman, L.H.; Ndubaku, C.O.; et al. Combining STING based neoantigen-targeted vaccine with checkpoint modulators enhances antitumor immunity in murine pancreatic cancer. JCI Insight 2018, 3, e122857. [Google Scholar]
  64. Ager, C.R.; Zhang, H.; Wei, Z.; Jones, P.; Curran, M.A.; Di Francesco, M.E. Discovery of IACS-8803 and IACS-8779, potent agonists of stimulator of interferon genes (STING) with robust systemic antitumor efficacy. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2019, 29, 126640. [Google Scholar]
  65. Endo, A.; Kim, D.S.; Huang, K.C.; Hao, M.H.; Mathieu, S.; Choi, H.; Majumder, U.; Zhu, X.; Shen, Y.; Sanders, K.; et al. Abstract 4456: Discovery of E7766: A representative of a novel class of macrocycle-bridged STING agonists (MBSAs) with superior potency and pan-genotypic activity. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 4456. [Google Scholar]
  66. Huang, K.C.; Zhang, C.; Yu, K.; Kim, D.S.; Dixit, V.; Hukkanen, R.; Choi, H.W.; Hutz, J.; Fang, F.; Bao, X. Abstract 592: Demonstration of E7766, a novel STING agonist, as a potent immunotherapy in BCG-insensitive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer models via intravesical administration. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2020, 80, 592. [Google Scholar]
  67. Huang, K.C.; Endo, A.; McGrath, S.; Chandra, D.; Wu, J.; Kim, D.S.; Albu, D.; Ingersoll, C.; Tendyke, K.; Loiacono, K.; et al. Abstract 3269: Discovery and characterization of E7766, a novel macrocycle-bridged STING agonist with pan-genotypic and potent antitumor activity through intravesical and intratumoral administration. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 3269. [Google Scholar]
  68. Ramanjulu, J.M.; Pesiridis, G.S.; Yang, J.; Concha, N.; Singhaus, R.; Zhang, S.Y.; Tran, J.L.; Moore, P.; Lehmann, S.; Eberl, H.C.; et al. Design of amidobenzimidazole STING receptor agonists with systemic activity. Nature 2018, 564, 439–443. [Google Scholar]
  69. Pan, B.S.; Perera, S.A.; Piesvaux, J.A.; Presland, J.P.; Schroeder, G.K.; Cumming, J.N.; Trotter, B.W.; Altman, M.D.; Buevich, A.V.; Cash, B.; et al. An orally available non-nucleotide STING agonist with antitumor activity. Science 2020, 369, eaba6098. [Google Scholar]
  70. Chan, S.R.; Bignan, G.; Pierson, E.; Mahady, S.; Ta, H.; Schepens, W.; Thuring, J.W.; Lim, H.K.; Otieno, M.; Wilde, T.; et al. Abstract 5567A: JNJ-‘6196: A next generation STING agonist with potent preclinical activity by the IV route. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2020, 80, 5567A. [Google Scholar]
  71. Leventhal, D.S.; Sokolovska, A.; Li, N.; Plescia, C.; Kolodziej, S.A.; Gallant, C.W.; Christmas, R.; Gao, J.R.; James, M.J.; Abin-Fuentes, A.; et al. Immunotherapy with engineered bacteria by targeting the STING pathway for anti-tumor immunity. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2739. [Google Scholar]
  72. Glickman, L.H.; Skoble, J.; Rae, C.S.; Makarova, A.M.; D’Antonio, M.A.; McGeehan, A.J.; Thanos, C. Abstract P235: STACT-TREX1: A novel tumor-targeting systemically-delivered STING pathway agonist demonstrates robust anti-tumor efficacy in multiple murine cancer models. In Proceedings of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer 33rd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA, 7–11 November 2018. [Google Scholar]
  73. Makarova, A.M.; Iannello, A.; Rae, C.S.; King, B.; Besprozvannaya, M.; Faulhaber, J.; Skoble, J.; Thanos, C.D.; Glickman, L.H. Abstract 5016: STACT-TREX1: A systemically-administered STING pathway agonist targets tumor-resident myeloid cells and induces adaptive anti-tumor immunity in multiple preclinical models. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 5016. [Google Scholar]
  74. Antisoma Research. Phase II Study of DMXAA (ASA404) in Combination with Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. 2014. Available online: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT00832494 (accessed on 18 June 2022).
  75. Pharmaceuticals, N. ASA404 or Placebo in Combination with Paclitaxel and Carboplatin as First-Line Treatment for Stage IIIb/IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (ATRACT-1). 2008. Available online: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT00662597 (accessed on 18 June 2022).
  76. Aduro, B.I.; Pharmaceuticals, N. Safety and Efficacy of MIW815 (ADU-S100) +/− Ipilimumab in Patients with Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors or Lymphomas. 2016. Available online: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT02675439 (accessed on 18 June 2022).
  77. Pharmaceuticals, N. Study of the Safety and Efficacy of MIW815 with PDR001 to Patients with Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors or Lymphomas. 2017. Available online: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03172936 (accessed on 18 June 2022).
  78. Chinook Therapeutics, Inc. Efficacy and Safety Trial of ADU-S100 and Pembrolizumab in Head and Neck Cancer. 2019. Available online: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03937141 (accessed on 18 June 2022).
  79. Sharp, M.; Dohme LLC. Study of MK-1454 Alone or in Combination with Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Participants with Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors or Lymphomas (MK-1454-001). 2017. Available online: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03010176 (accessed on 18 June 2022).
  80. Sharp, M.; Dohme LLC. Study of Intratumoral (IT) MK-1454 in Combination with Intravenous (IV) Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Compared to IV Pembrolizumab Alone as the First Line Treatment of Metastatic or Unresectable, Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) (MK-1454-002). 2020. Available online: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT04220866 (accessed on 18 June 2022).
  81. F-Star Therapeutics, Inc. Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of SB 11285 Alone and in Combination with Nivolumab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. 2019. Available online: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT04096638 (accessed on 18 June 2022).
  82. Immune Sensor Therapeutics Inc. Safety and Efficacy Study of IMSA101 in Refractory Malignancies. 2019. Available online: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT04020185 (accessed on 18 June 2022).
  83. Eisai Inc.; H3 Biomedicine Inc. Study of Intratumorally Administered Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING) Agonist E7766 in Participants with Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphomas—INSTAL-101. 2020. Available online: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT04144140 (accessed on 18 June 2022).
  84. Eisai Inc.; H3 Biomedicine Inc. A Study of Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING) Agonist E7766 in Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Including Participants Unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) Therapy, INPUT102. 2019. Available online: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT04109092 (accessed on 18 June 2022).
  85. Sharp, M.; Dohme LLC. Study of MK-2118 Administered as Intratumoral Injection as Monotherapy and in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) or by Subcutaneous Injection in Combination With Pembrolizumab in the Treatment of Adults With Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors or Lymphomas (MK-2118-001). 2017. Available online: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03249792 (accessed on 18 June 2022).
  86. Synlogic. Safety and Tolerability of SYNB1891 Injection Alone or in Combination with Atezolizumab in Adult Subjects. 2019. Available online: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT04167137 (accessed on 18 June 2022).
  87. Toulany, M. Targeting DNA double-strand break repair pathways to improve radiotherapy response. Genes 2019, 10, 25. [Google Scholar]
  88. Deng, L.; Liang, H.; Xu, M.; Yang, X.; Burnette, B.; Arina, A.; Li, X.D.; Mauceri, H.; Beckett, M.; Darga, T.; et al. STING-dependent cytosolic DNA sensing promotes radiation-induced type I interferon-dependent antitumor immunity in immunogenic tumors. Immunity 2014, 41, 843–852. [Google Scholar]
  89. Bernard, J.J.; Gallo, R.L. Photoimmunology: How ultraviolet radiation affects the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2019, 19, 688–701. [Google Scholar]
  90. Fillon, M. Lung cancer radiation may increase the risk of major adverse cardiac events. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2019, 69, 435–437. [Google Scholar]
  91. Luo, M.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Han, C.; Samandi, L.Z.; Dong, C.; Sumer, B.D.; Lea, J.; Fu, Y.X.; Gao, J. Synergistic STING activation by PC7A nanovaccine and ionizing radiation improves cancer immunotherapy. J. Control. Release 2019, 300, 154–160. [Google Scholar]
  92. Patel, R.B.; Ye, M.; Carlson, P.M.; Jaquish, A.; Zangl, L.; Ma, B.; Wang, Y.; Arthur, I.; Xie, R.; Brown, R.J.; et al. Development of an In Situ cancer vaccine via combinational radiation and bacterial-membrane-coated nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, el902626. [Google Scholar]
  93. Liu, Y.; Crowe, W.N.; Wang, L.; Lu, Y.; Petty, W.J.; Habib, A.A.; Zhao, D. An inhalable nanoparticulate STING agonist synergizes with radiotherapy to confer long-term control of lung metastases. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5108. [Google Scholar]
  94. Dasari, S.; Tchounwou, P.B. Cisplatin in cancer therapy: Molecular mechanisms of action. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 740, 364–378. [Google Scholar]
  95. Grabosch, S.; Bulatovic, M.; Zeng, F.; Ma, T.; Zhang, L.; Ross, M.; Brozick, J.; Fang, Y.; Tseng, G.; Kim, E.; et al. Cisplatin-induced immune modulation in ovarian cancer mouse models with distinct inflammation profiles. Oncogene 2019, 38, 2380–2393. [Google Scholar]
  96. Ahn, J.; Xia, T.; Konno, H.; Konno, K.; Ruiz, P.; Barber, G.N. Inflammation-driven carcinogenesis is mediated through STING. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5166. [Google Scholar]
  97. Gan, Y.; Li, X.; Han, S.; Liang, Q.; Ma, X.; Rong, P.; Wang, W.; Li, W. The cGAS/STING Pathway: A Novel Target for Cancer Therapy. Front. Immunol. 2022, 12, 795401. [Google Scholar]
  98. Zheng, J.; Mo, J.; Zhu, T.; Zhuo, W.; Yi, Y.; Hu, S.; Yin, J.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, H.; Liu, Z. Comprehensive elaboration of the cGAS-STING signaling axis in cancer development and immunotherapy. Mol. Cancer 2020, 19, 133. [Google Scholar]
  99. Luthra, P.; Aguirre, S.; Yen, B.C.; Pietzsch, C.A.; Sanchez-Aparicio, M.T.; Tigabu, B.; Morlock, L.K.; García-Sastre, A.; Leung, D.W.; Williams, N.S.; et al. Topoisomerase II Inhibitors Induce DNA Damage-Dependent Interferon Responses Circumventing Ebola Virus Immune Evasion. mBio 2017, 8, e00368-17. [Google Scholar]
  100. Xue, A.; Shang, Y.; Jiao, P.; Zhang, S.; Zhu, C.; He, X.; Feng, G.; Fan, S. Increased activation of cGAS-STING pathway enhances radiosensitivity of non-small cell lung cancer cells. Thorac. Cancer 2022, 13, 1361–1368. [Google Scholar]
  101. Jagodinsky, J.C.; Jin, W.J.; Bates, A.M.; Hernandez, R.; Grudzinski, J.J.; Marsh, I.R.; Chakravarty, I.; Arthur, I.S.; Zangl, L.M.; Brown, R.J.; et al. Temporal analysis of type 1 interferon activation in tumor cells following external beam radiotherapy or targeted radionuclide therapy. Theranostics 2021, 11, 6120–6137. [Google Scholar]
  102. Carroll, E.C.; Jin, L.; Mori, A.; Muñoz-Wolf, N.; Oleszycka, E.; Moran, H.B.T.; Mansouri, S.; McEntee, C.P.; Lambe, E.; Agger, E.M.; et al. The vaccine adjuvant chitosan promotes cellular immunity via DNA sensor cGAS-STING-dependent induction of type I interferons. Immunity 2016, 44, 597–608. [Google Scholar]
  103. Flood, B.A.; Higgs, E.F.; Li, S.; Luke, J.J.; Gajewski, T.F. STING pathway agonism as a cancer therapeutic. Immunol. Rev. 2019, 290, 24–38. [Google Scholar]
  104. Yi, M.; Zheng, X.; Niu, M.; Zhu, S.; Ge, H.; Wu, K. Combination strategies with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: Current advances and future directions. Mol. Cancer 2022, 21, 28. [Google Scholar]
  105. Wang, H.; Hu, S.; Chen, X.; Shi, H.; Chen, C.; Sun, L.; Chen, Z.J. cGAS is essential for the antitumor effect of immune checkpoint blockade. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017, 114, 1637–1642. [Google Scholar]
  106. Ager, C.R.; Reilley, M.J.; Nicholas, C.; Bartkowiak, T.; Jaiswal, A.R.; Curran, M.A. Intratumoral STING activation with T-cell checkpoint modulation generates systemic antitumor immunity. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2017, 5, 676–684. [Google Scholar]
  107. Wilson, D.R.; Sen, R.; Sunshine, J.C.; Pardoll, D.M.; Green, J.J.; Kim, Y.J. Biodegradable STING agonist nanoparticles for enhanced cancer immunotherapy. Nanomedicine 2018, 14, 237–246. [Google Scholar]
  108. Dorta-Estremera, S.; Hegde, V.L.; Slay, R.B.; Sun, R.; Yanamandra, A.V.; Nicholas, C.; Nookala, S.; Sierra, G.; Curran, M.A.; Sastry, K.J. Targeting Interferon Signaling and CTLA-4 Enhance the Therapeutic Efficacy of Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy in Preclinical Model of HPV Oral Cancer. J. Immunother. Cancer 2019, 7, 252. [Google Scholar]
  109. Nakamura, T.; Sato, T.; Endo, R.; Sasaki, S.; Takahashi, N.; Sato, Y.; Hyodo, M.; Hayakawa, Y.; Harashima, H. STING agonist loaded lipid nanoparticles overcome anti-PD-1 resistance in melanoma lung metastasis via NK cell activation. J. Immunother. Cancer 2021, 9, e002852. [Google Scholar]
  110. Xu, N.; Palmer, D.C.; Robeson, A.C.; Shou, P.; Bommiasamy, H.; Laurie, S.J.; Willis, C.; Dotti, G.; Vincent, B.G.; Restifo, N.P.; et al. STING agonist promotes CAR T cell trafficking and persistence in breast cancer. J. Exp. Med. 2021, 218, e20200844. [Google Scholar]
  111. Da, Y.; Liu, Y.; Hu, Y.; Liu, W.; Ma, J.; Lu, N.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, C. STING agonist cGAMP enhances anti-tumor activity of CAR-NK cells against pancreatic cancer. Oncoimmunology 2022, 11, 2054105. [Google Scholar]
Molecules 27 04638 g001 550
Figure 1. The cGAS-STING pathway. The cytosolic DNA sensor cGAS interacts with exogenous DNA from dying cells, virus, and bacteria, which promotes a conformational change in cGAS to catalyze the formation of cGAMP. The cGAS activation and cGAMP synthase activate protein STING. TBK1 and STING co-phosphate IRF3. Dimerized IRF3 imports to the nucleus to target corresponding genes. IRF3 regulates the expression of IFNB1 in the nucleus. IFNB1 translation in the cytoplasm results in the production of type I IFN, secreting out of cells. Type I IFN stimulates tyrosine kinase-associated receptor and IFNAR1/IFNAR2 heterodimers, which phosphorylates STAT1/STAT2. IRF9 together with phosphorylated dimer STAT/STAT, as a transcriptional factor, transactivates cGAS, developing the positive feedback of cGAS-STING signals. Similarly, mitogen-activated protein kinase 14 and IKK are recruited by activated STING. NIK phosphorylates nuclear factor kappa B subunit 2 (NFKB2/p100) combined with RELB. After degradation of phosphorylated p100 to p52, p52 and REBL form a heterodimer to elicit non-canonical NF-κB signals. For the canonical NF-κB signals, kinase IKK phosphorylates NF-κB inhibitor alpha to recognize proteasomal degradation. Thus, the heterodimer p65/p50 is separated from the IκB/p65/p50 complex to the nucleus, eliciting canonical NF-κB signals. Activation of the cGAS-STING signal pathway induces a series of immune cascades to produce diverse products, including type I IFN, inflammatory cytokines, and chemokines. In an autocrine way, it could promote the maturation, activation, and polarization of macrophages. In a paracrine way, the different cytokines produced by APCs could recruit T lymphocytes and promote their proliferation and differentiation. All the above immune responses participate in the pathogenesis and progression of various diseases. Abbreviations: cGAS, cyclic GMP-AMP synthase; cGAMP, 2′,3′-cyclic GMP-AMP; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; IFN, interferon; IFNAR1, Interferon Alpha And Beta Receptor Subunit 1; IFNAR2, Interferon Alpha And Beta Receptor Subunit 2; IKK, IkB kinase; IFNB1, Interferon Beta 1; IRF, interferon regulatory factor; JAK-STAT, the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; STING, stimulator of interferon genes; NIK, NF-κB-inducing kinase; RELB, RELB proto-oncogene; TBK1, TANK-binding kinase 1.
Figure 1. The cGAS-STING pathway. The cytosolic DNA sensor cGAS interacts with exogenous DNA from dying cells, virus, and bacteria, which promotes a conformational change in cGAS to catalyze the formation of cGAMP. The cGAS activation and cGAMP synthase activate protein STING. TBK1 and STING co-phosphate IRF3. Dimerized IRF3 imports to the nucleus to target corresponding genes. IRF3 regulates the expression of IFNB1 in the nucleus. IFNB1 translation in the cytoplasm results in the production of type I IFN, secreting out of cells. Type I IFN stimulates tyrosine kinase-associated receptor and IFNAR1/IFNAR2 heterodimers, which phosphorylates STAT1/STAT2. IRF9 together with phosphorylated dimer STAT/STAT, as a transcriptional factor, transactivates cGAS, developing the positive feedback of cGAS-STING signals. Similarly, mitogen-activated protein kinase 14 and IKK are recruited by activated STING. NIK phosphorylates nuclear factor kappa B subunit 2 (NFKB2/p100) combined with RELB. After degradation of phosphorylated p100 to p52, p52 and REBL form a heterodimer to elicit non-canonical NF-κB signals. For the canonical NF-κB signals, kinase IKK phosphorylates NF-κB inhibitor alpha to recognize proteasomal degradation. Thus, the heterodimer p65/p50 is separated from the IκB/p65/p50 complex to the nucleus, eliciting canonical NF-κB signals. Activation of the cGAS-STING signal pathway induces a series of immune cascades to produce diverse products, including type I IFN, inflammatory cytokines, and chemokines. In an autocrine way, it could promote the maturation, activation, and polarization of macrophages. In a paracrine way, the different cytokines produced by APCs could recruit T lymphocytes and promote their proliferation and differentiation. All the above immune responses participate in the pathogenesis and progression of various diseases. Abbreviations: cGAS, cyclic GMP-AMP synthase; cGAMP, 2′,3′-cyclic GMP-AMP; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; IFN, interferon; IFNAR1, Interferon Alpha And Beta Receptor Subunit 1; IFNAR2, Interferon Alpha And Beta Receptor Subunit 2; IKK, IkB kinase; IFNB1, Interferon Beta 1; IRF, interferon regulatory factor; JAK-STAT, the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; STING, stimulator of interferon genes; NIK, NF-κB-inducing kinase; RELB, RELB proto-oncogene; TBK1, TANK-binding kinase 1.
Molecules 27 04638 g001
Molecules 27 04638 g002 550
Figure 2. The role of the STING pathway in tumor suppression. In the tumor microenvironment, cGAS-STING in DCs plays an important role in the cross-presentation and priming of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells. Tumor-derived DNA can be taken up by DCs such as protein antigen, resulting in the upregulation of type I IFN. Type I IFN reinforces the cross-presentation of DCs by promoting antigen retention and CD8+ DCs survival. DCs cultured with type I IFN show increased expression of CCR7, which indicates an improved lymph node-homing capability. Additionally, type I IFN upregulates the expression of multiple Th1 chemokines, including CXCL9 and CXCL10, which is important for the homing of APC and trafficking of cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Abbreviations: CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocytes; CXCL9, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 9; IFN, interferon; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; PD-1/PD-L1, anti-programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1; TA, tumor antigen; Treg, regulatory T cell.
Figure 2. The role of the STING pathway in tumor suppression. In the tumor microenvironment, cGAS-STING in DCs plays an important role in the cross-presentation and priming of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells. Tumor-derived DNA can be taken up by DCs such as protein antigen, resulting in the upregulation of type I IFN. Type I IFN reinforces the cross-presentation of DCs by promoting antigen retention and CD8+ DCs survival. DCs cultured with type I IFN show increased expression of CCR7, which indicates an improved lymph node-homing capability. Additionally, type I IFN upregulates the expression of multiple Th1 chemokines, including CXCL9 and CXCL10, which is important for the homing of APC and trafficking of cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Abbreviations: CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocytes; CXCL9, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 9; IFN, interferon; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; PD-1/PD-L1, anti-programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1; TA, tumor antigen; Treg, regulatory T cell.
Molecules 27 04638 g002
Table
Table 1. Summary of STING agonists used in clinical trials.
Table 1. Summary of STING agonists used in clinical trials.
DrugAdministrationPhaseCancer TypeClinical Trial
NCT Number		PatientsReferences
ASA404 + Paclitaxel + carboplatini.v.I/IIAdvanced and metastatic
NSCLC		NCT00832494105[74]
ASA404 + Paclitaxel + carboplatini.v.IIIb/IVNSCLCNCT006625971285[75]
ADU-S100 +/− ipilimumabADU-S100(i.t.)
ipilimumab(i.v.)		IAdvanced/Metastatic
solid tumors or lymphomas		NCT0267543947[76]
ADU-S100 +/− PDR001ADU-S100(i.t.)
PDR001(i.v.)		IbAdvanced/Metastatic
solid tumors or lymphomas		Nct03172936106[77]
ADU-S100 +/− perbrolizumabADU-S100(i.t.)
perbrolizumab(i.v.)		IIRecurrent and metastatic
HNSCC advanced
solid tumors		NCT0393714133[78]
MK-1454 +/− perbrolizumabMK-1454(i.t.)
perbrolizumab(i.v.)		IAdvanced/Metastatic
solid tumors or lymphomas		NCT03010176235[79]
MK-1454 +/− perbrolizumabMK-1454(i.t.)
perbrolizumab(i.v.)		IIMetastatic or unresectable,
recurrent HNSCC		NCT04220866200[80]
SB 11285 + AtezolizumabSB 11285(i.v.)
Atezolizumab		Ia/IbMelanoma, HNSCC
and advanced solid tumor		NCT04096638110[81]
IMSA101 +/− ICIIMSA101(i.t.)
ICI		I/IIaAdvanced treatment-
refractory malignancies		NCT04020185115[82]
E7766i.t.I/IbAdvanced solid tumors
or lymphomas		NCT04144140120[83]
E7766i.t.I/IbNon-muscle invasive
bladder cancer		NCT04109092120[84]
MK-2118 +/− perbrolizumabi.t.IAdvanced/Metastatic
solid tumors
or lymphomas		NCT03249792160[85]
SYNB1891 +/− Atezolizumabi.t.IAdvanced solid tumors
or lymphomas		NCT0416713770[86]
Abbreviations: NSCLC: Non-small cell lung cancer; HNSCC: head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; i.t.: intratumoral injection; i.v. intravenous injection; ICI: immune checkpoint inhibitor; +/−: combination/alone.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luo, K.; Li, N.; Ye, W.; Gao, H.; Luo, X.; Cheng, B. Activation of Stimulation of Interferon Genes (STING) Signal and Cancer Immunotherapy. Molecules 2022, 27, 4638. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27144638

AMA Style

Luo K, Li N, Ye W, Gao H, Luo X, Cheng B. Activation of Stimulation of Interferon Genes (STING) Signal and Cancer Immunotherapy. Molecules. 2022; 27(14):4638. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27144638

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luo, Kewang, Ning Li, Wei Ye, Hanchao Gao, Xinle Luo, and Baohui Cheng. 2022. "Activation of Stimulation of Interferon Genes (STING) Signal and Cancer Immunotherapy" Molecules 27, no. 14: 4638. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27144638

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop