Next Article in Journal
Docking, Binding Free Energy Calculations and In Vitro Characterization of Pyrazine Linked 2-Aminobenzamides as Novel Class I Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibitors
Previous Article in Journal
Hollow-Structure Pt-Ni Nanoparticle Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Isolation and Characterization of Antagonist Trichoderma spp. from the Soil of Abha, Saudi Arabia

Department of Botany & Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11495, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(8), 2525; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27082525
Submission received: 12 March 2022 / Revised: 5 April 2022 / Accepted: 12 April 2022 / Published: 14 April 2022

Abstract

:
Background: The genus Trichoderma is widely spread in the environment, mainly in soils. Trichoderma are filamentous fungi and are used in a wide range of fields to manage plant patho-genic fungi. They have proven to be effective biocontrol agents due to their high reproducibility, adaptability, efficient nutrient mobilization, ability to colonize the rhizosphere, significant inhibitory effects against phytopathogenic fungi, and efficacy in promoting plant growth. In the present study, the antagonist Trichoderma isolates were characterized from the soil of Abha region, Saudi Arabia. Methodology: Soil samples were collected from six locations of Abha, Saudi Arabia to isolate Trichoderma having the antagonistic potential against plant pathogenic fungi. The soil dilution plate method was used to isolate Trichoderma (Trichoderma Specific Medium (TSM)). Isolated Trichoderma were evaluated for their antagonistic potential against Fusarium oxysporum, Alternaria alternata and Helminthosporium rostratum. The antagonist activity was assessed by dual culture assay, and the effect of volatile metabolites and culture filtrate of Trichoderma. In addition, the effect of different temperature and salt concentrations on the growth of Trichoderma isolates were also evaluated. Results: The most potent Trichoderma species were identified by using ITS4 and ITS 5 primers. Total 48 Trichoderma isolates were isolated on (TSM) from the soil samples out of those six isolates were found to have antagonist potential against the tested plant pathogenic fungi. In general, Trichoderma strains A (1) 2.1 T, A (3) 3.1 T and A (6) 2.2 T were found to be highly effective in reducing the growth of tested plant pathogenic fungi. Trichoderma A (1) 2.1 T was highly effective against F. oxysporum (82%), whereas Trichoderma A (6) 2.2 T prevented the maximal growth of H. rostratum (77%) according to the dual culture data. Furthermore, Trichoderma A (1) 2.1 T volatile metabolites hindered F. oxysporum growth. The volatile metabolite of Trichoderma A (6) 2.2 T, on the other hand, had the strongest activity against A. alternata (45%). The Trichoderma A (1) 2.1 T culture filtrate was proven to be effective in suppressing the growth of H. rostratum (47%). The temperature range of 26 °C to 30 °C was observed to be optimum for Trichoderma growth. Trichoderma isolates grew well at salt concentrations (NaCl) of 2%, and with the increasing salt concentration the growth of isolates decreased. The molecular analysis of potent fungi by ITS4 and ITS5 primers confirmed that the Trichoderma isolates A (1) 2.1 T, A (3) 3.1 and A (6) 2.2 T were T. harzianum, T. brevicompactum, and T. velutinum, respectively. Conclusions: The study concludes that the soil of the Abha region contains a large population of diverse fungi including Trichoderma, which can be explored further to be used as biocontrol agents.

1. Introduction

Microorganisms in the soil effect the ecosystem by contributing to soil structure, soil fertility, plant health, and plant nutrition [1]. It has been widely documented in the last two decades that a larger part of the harsh environment is inhabited by varied microbial communities. Soil microorganisms include three major groups such as: bacteria, archaea and fungi. One of the most important ascomycete funguses that is found in soil is Trichoderma, which has the ability to produce a wide range of antibiotic substances and mycoparasite activities such as gliovirin, gliotoxin, viridin, pyrones, peptaibols, and α-aminoisobutyric acid [2]. Trichoderma species compete with other soil microorganisms for nutrients and space because they grow rapidly [1]. Due to the rapid growth of Trichoderma species and the abundance of their conidia, its isolation could be possible from soil by all available conventional methods. It has been detected to be related with plants such as epiphytes and endophytes as well as in the rhizospheric region and it plays considerable roles in plant growth promotion and soil health. Several species of Trichoderma have been detected up to now but many are yet to be explored [3].
Trichoderma species are filamentous fungi used in a wide range of fields to improve plant health for their multiple benefits, such as giving their hosts improved growth, increased disease resistance and the ability to tolerate abiotic stress [4]. Several species of Trichoderma (T. virens, T. atroviride, and T. asperellum) are capable of producing the phytohormone indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) auxin, and are used to promote plant root growth, it has been suggested [5].
It is distinguished for making signal molecules that effect the growth of plants and other fungi. Mycoparasitism is the most important mechanism against pathogens for Trichoderma spp. [6]. According to soil modification using this species, favorable results are shown for controlling soil-borne pathogens such as Pythium spp., Fusarium spp. and Phytophthora spp. and differences in antagonistic activity against the pathogen lead to inconsistencies in disease control [7]. Trichoderma strains have been proven to be effective biocontrol agents due to their high reproducibility, adaptability, efficient nutrient mobilization, their ability to colonize the rhizosphere, significant inhibitory effects against phytopathogenic fungi, and their efficacy in promoting plant growth. Trichoderma strains have been created and utilized as biocontrol agents against plant fungal infections. The strains T. harzianum, T. viride, and T. virens have been most commonly utilized for biological control. According to some studies, they are efficient in reducing root rots/wilt complexes and foliar diseases in a variety of crops, as well as in suppressing a variety of phytopathogens such as Rhizoctonia, Pythium, Sclerotinia, Sclerotium, Fusarium, and Macrophomina [7]. The current study was conducted to isolate and characterize antagonist Trichoderma sp. from the soil of Abha region, Saudi Arabia.

2. Results

Isolation of Trichoderma spp. from the Soil of Abha, Saudi Arabia

For isolation of antagonist Trichoderma spp., 6 soil samples were collected from 6 different locations in Abha, Saudi Arabia. The dilution plate method was used for the isolation of fungi from soil samples. Table 1 shows the colony-forming units (CFU)/g of fungi on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) and Trichoderma Specific Medium (TSM). The fungal population isolated from different soils on the PDA plates ranged from 45.3 × 102 CFU/g to 16 × 102 CFU/g. The maximum number of colonies of fungi on PDA plates (45.3 × 102 CFU/g) were counted from Al Areen (A3). The fungal population on the TSM plates from different soil samples ranged between 83 × 102 CFU/g to 8.3 × 102 CFU/g. The highest number of colonies on TSM (83 × 102 CFU/g) was recorded from the soil sample collected from Ain al-Dhibah (A5).
Forty-eight isolates of Trichoderma were picked from TSM plates, which represent soil samples of different regions of Abha. The Trichoderma isolates were purified and identified microscopically. The radial growth and growth rate of these isolated Trichoderma spp. were determined on PDA (Table 2). The total radial growth and growth rate of these isolated Trichoderma varies a lot. The total radial growth of isolated Trichoderma isolates ranges between 9.2 cm to 84 cm, while the growth rate was between 1.4 cm/day to 11.9 cm/day at 28 °C on PDA plates.
The Trichoderma isolates with the most distinct cultural and microscopic traits were selected for further evaluation. A total of six Trichoderma isolates were analyzed further.
The results of the dual culture assay of the isolated Trichoderma spp. against A. alternata, F. oxysporum and H. rostratum are presented in Table 3. It shows that all isolates of Trichoderma were able to inhibit the growth of tested plant pathogenic fungi. The percent reduction in A. alternata growth by different Trichoderma isolates ranged between 66% and 16%. The maximum reduction in the growth of A. alternata was achieved by Trichoderma (A (1) 2.1 T). Similarly, Trichoderma (A (1) 2.1 T) was able to reduce maximum growth of F. oxysporum (82%). While in the case of the plant pathogenic fungus, H. rostratum, the Trichoderma isolate (A (6) 2.2 T) was rendered to maximum growth inhibition of H. rostratum (77 %).
The data of the effect of volatile metabolites of Trichoderma isolates on the pathogenic fungi are given in Figure 1. The highest growth inhibition of A. alternata by Trichoderma was 45% by the Trichoderma isolate A (6) 2.2 T, while the lowest rate of growth inhibition of A. alternata was 5% by the Trichoderma isolate A (1) 2.3 T. As for F. oxysporum, the highest percentage of growth inhibition by Trichoderma was 77% by the isolate A (1) 2.1 T, and the lowest percentage of growth inhibition of F. oxysporum by Trichoderma was 1% by the isolate A (1) 2.3 T. The rate of inhibition of the growth of H. rostratum by Trichoderma was the highest, 22% by the isolate A (1) 2.1 T, while the lowest rate of growth inhibition of H. rostratum was 6% by the Trichoderma isolate A (3) 3.1 T. (Figure 1).
The result on the effect of culture filtrate of Trichoderma spp. on the plant pathogenic fungi reveals that most of the Trichoderma isolates were able to inhibit the growth of the pathogens. The highest inhibition in the growth of A. alternata (29%) was recorded by the culture filtrate of Trichoderma (A (1) 2.3 T).
As for the F. oxysporum, the highest percentage of growth inhibition (16%) was achieved by the Trichoderma (A (3) 3.1 T). The culture filtrate of Trichoderma (A (1) 2.1 T) inhibited the maximum growth of H. rostratum (41%) (Figure 2).
The data on the effect of different temperatures on the radial growth of Trichoderma isolates shows that, in general, the optimum temperature for their maximum growth ranges between 26 °C and 30 °C. At temperatures of 45 °C and 50 °C, the rate of radial growth was weak. The lowest growth of Trichoderma was at temperatures of 50 and 45, with a mean of 5 mm for all samples (Table 4).
The data presented in Table 5 show that Trichoderma isolates were able to grow at all the salt concentrations tested (0%, 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, and 10% NaCl). The radial growth was best at 2%, 4%, and 6% salinity concentrations. However, at concentrations of 8% and 10%, the radial growth was medium to weak. The lowest growth of Trichoderma isolates was at a salinity concentration of 10% (5 mm). The highest growth rate of Trichoderma isolates was 2% (85 mm) (Table 5).
The molecular identification of the most potential Trichoderma isolates (A (1) 2.1 T), (A (3) 3.1 T) and (A (6) 2.2 T) by ITS 4 and ITS 5 showed that they were Trichoderma harzianum, Trichoderma brevicompactum and Trichoderma velutinum, respectively. The analysis of 18S rDNA of the Trichoderma isolates, by amplifying internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) with primers ITS4 and ITS5 and the BlastN search revealed 100% identity with 0.0 EV to T. harzianum (MF871551.1) (Figure 3) T. brevicompactum (KR094463.1) (Figure 4) and T. velutinum (EU280080.1) (Figure 5) in NCBI GenBank respectively.

3. Discussion

Fungi from the genus Trichoderma have been widely used in agriculture as biocontrol agents because of their mycoparasitic potential and their ability to increase plant health and protection against phytopathogens, making it a great plant symbiont. Trichoderma’s processes include the secretion of effector molecules and secondary metabolites, which mediate Trichoderma’s positive interaction with plants and provide resistance to biotic and abiotic [4].
The findings revealed that there was a good population of fungi in Abha’s soil. From this area, many Trichoderma were isolated such as T. velutinum, T. brevicompactum and T. harzianum, each with a different cultural, microscopic and radial growth pattern. Recently, researchers reported that the fungi population was between 4.19 and 4.67 CFU/g from the Riyadh region, Saudi Arabia. They also reported the presence of the genus Trichoderma in the region [8,9,10,11,12]. Trichoderma spp. can adapt to various habitats easily and, generally, they are fast growers compared to their counter parts, pathogenic fungi.
The dual culture interaction and volatile components results revealed that Trichoderma spp. caused appreciable inhibition of mycelia growth of tested plant pathogenic fungi, F. oxysporum, A. alternata and H. rostratum. These fungi are important pathogens and are of concern to plant growers as they cause various important diseases. Fusarium spp. causes root and stem rot, vascular wilt, and/or fruit rot in a number of economically important crop species. It is considered one of the most important genera of plant pathogenic fungi [13]. The Alternaria are responsible for many pre- and post-harvest diseases, especially to horticulture crops, causing diseases such as leaf spots, rots, and blights [14]. Helminthosporium spp. causes leaf spot diseases mainly on cereals like sorghum, maize, wheat, rice, and several other grasses [15]. Twelve Trichoderma isolates were tested for antagonistic capacity in confrontational assays with three plant pathogens (Rhizoctonia solani, Pythium ultimum, and Alternaria solani) on PDA at 28 °C for four days. The three pathogens’ mycelial proliferation was inhibited by all Trichoderma isolates. The percentage reduction in pathogen development ranged from 36.5 to 81.4 percent [10]. Trichoderma isolates were tested for antagonism in vitro against Sclerotium rolfsii, Rhizoctonia solani, and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentis at three different temperatures: 25 °C, 30 °C, and 35 °C in a dual inoculation test after 5 days of incubation. All Trichoderma isolates suppressed all three pathogens to varying degrees at 30 °C, 25 °C, and 35 °C [16]. Depending on the degree of resistance of C. acutatum isolates, the volatile components of Trichoderma harzianum exhibit a varying inhibitory impact [17]. The effect of T. harzianum culture filtrate on spore germination was evaluated. The culture filtrate of T. harzianum T3 or T24 greatly inhibited the spore germination of the tested post-harvest pathogenic fungi [18]. Previous studies have demonstrated that before mycelia of fungi interact, Trichoderma sp. produces low quantities of extracellular exochitinases [19,20]. The diffusion of these enzymes disintegrates host cells. These cell fragments, in turn, cause the creation of more enzymes, which set off a chain reaction of physiological changes, allowing Trichoderma spp. to proliferate quickly and precisely [21]. F. oxysporum, A. alternata, and H. rostratum, were also inhibited by the culture filtrate of the six Trichoderma spp. that were investigated. None of them, however, were fungicidal. Trichoderma produces antibiotics such as trichodernin, trichodermol, harzianum A, and harzianolide, which are well known [22]. Some cell wall-degrading enzymes, such as chitinases and glucanases, damage cell wall integrity by breaking down polysaccharides, chitins, and glucanase [23,24,25].The efficiency of these metabolites is dependent on the kind, quality, and quantity of antibiotics, as well as on the inhibitory compounds released by antagonists [24]. Antibiosis is produced by the creation of volatile components and non-volatile antibiotics that are inhibitory against a spectrum of soil borne fungus: Alternaria alternata, Botryotinia fuckeliana and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. These, as well as parasitism, are all possible means of antagonism used by Trichoderma spp. Synergism between distinct forms of action modes is also a natural scenario for fungal pathogen biocontrol. Many of these ideas have been thoroughly discussed in recent reviews [26].
The current findings revealed that the optimal temperature for isolated Trichoderma growth was 26 °C and 30 °C. Temperature is a key factor in controlling development, sporulation, saprophytic ability, and the synthesis of non-volatile metabolites involved in nutrition, competition, mycoparasitism, and extracellular enzymes that break down fungi’s cell walls. Although most Trichoderma strains are mesophilic, the optimal temperature for growth varies amongst isolates [27,28].
A study reported that the radial growth of twelve isolates of Trichoderma showed variation at all of the temperatures examined (20 °C, 25 °C, 30 °C, 35 °C, 40 °C, 45 °C) after three days of incubation. At 30 °C, all isolates showed a maximum radial growth of 70 [16]. T. viride thrived at temperatures ranging from 10 °C to 30 °C, with maximum growth at 25 °C [29]. In vitro and in vivo test settings revealed that T. afroharzianum T22 and T. atroviride P1 grew differently at 20 and 25 °C [30].
Salt stress is a significant abiotic element that has a significant impact on the soil microbial community, affecting crop productivity [31]. The present study had recorded that even at the highest concentration examined, the majority of the Trichoderma showed tolerance to NaCI (10%). The growth, on the other hand, was better at lower NaCl concentrations. The optimal NaCl content for Trichoderma growth was 2%. Similar results were reported earlier by researchers, when they demonstrated that the presence of sodium chloride (2%) in the medium alters the morphology of T. harzianum as well as its antagonistic potential [32]. Extrusion systems have been found in Trichoderma species to keep intracellular sodium levels below lethal levels for the cells [33]. T. harzianum, T. viride, and T. koningii were shown to be tolerant of a wide range of salt concentrations in soil samples taken from glacier sites in the Indian Himalaya [34]. Furthermore, [24] suggested that high salt concentrations be utilized to prevent the prevalence of fungal/bacterial contamination in salt tolerant Trichoderma stocks [35].
A study reported that twelve increased salt concentrations (NaCl) resulted in a reduction in the radial development of 12 Trichoderma isolates observed after five days of incubation at 28 ± 1 °C [16]. Another study found that as the concentration of NaCl was raised, so did the level of Trichoderma growth inhibition [36].
Trichoderma isolates with the best results were identified using ITS molecular analysis. They were identified as T. harzianum, T. brevicompactum, and T. velutinum. The antagonistic potential of these three Trichoderma has been demonstrated in several investigations [9,37,38,39,40].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Collection of Soil Samples and Isolation of Trichoderma spp. from the Soil of Abha, Saudi Arabia

4.1.1. Soil Sampling

For the collection of soil samples, six regions in Abha, Saudi Arabia were selected (Table 6 and Figure 6). A total of six soil samples (500 g each) were collected from different ecological habitats for the isolation of Trichoderma spp.

4.1.2. Isolation of Fungi

The soil dilution plate method was employed for the isolation of fungi. Trichoderma Selective Medium (TSM) and Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) were used for the isolation of fungi. The plates were incubated at 28 °C for 5 days. The number of fungal colonies on the PDA and TSM plates was counted, and the total CFU/g of soil was calculated. Putative Trichoderma colonies on TSM plates were purified using two rounds of PDA subculture, and pure cultures were stored at 4 °C for further analysis [42].

4.2. Isolation and Characterization of Trichoderma spp. Antagonist to Plant Pathogenic Fungi

The pure cultures of fungi isolated from the TSM plates were observed for morphological and cultural characteristics of Trichoderma [43,44]. The micro characteristics such as conidia and philaids of the isolates were observed under the light microscopes and the genera of the isolated Trichoderma were confirmed [42].
Trichoderma isolates were evaluated for their potential to antagonize economically important plant pathogens, Fusarium oxysporum, Alternaria alternata and Helminthosporium rostratum. Identified plant pathogenic fungi cultures were obtained from the Department of Botany and Microbiology, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The antagonist activity of Trichoderma against F. oxysporum, A. alternata and H. rostratum were assayed by employing a dual culture assay, an effect of volatile metabolites of Trichoderma, and the effect of the culture filtrate of [37,38].

4.3. Effect of Different Temperature on the Growth of Trichoderma Isolates

The selected Trichoderma isolates were inoculated on the PDA and incubated at 26 °C, 30 °C, 45 °C and 50 °C for 7 days. The growth of Trichoderma isolates were determined by measuring the radial colony growth on the media [31].

4.4. Effect of Different Salt Concentration on the Growth of Trichoderma Isolates

The selected Trichoderma isolates were inoculated on the PDA containing on 0%, 2%, 4%, 6%, 8% and 10% NaCl, and were incubated at 28 °C for 7 days. The growth of Trichoderma isolates was determined by measuring the radial colony growth on the media [31].

5. Molecular Identification

5.1. DNA Extraction

From the pure culture of each fungus, a small lump of mycelia was collected and transferred by a sterile toothpick into a 1.5 mL. Eppendorf tube containing a lysis buffer (400 mM Tris-HCL (pH 8), 60 mM EDTA-pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl and 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate). The tube was vortexed to disrupt the mycelia and was kept for 10 min at room temperature after that 150 µL of potassium acetate followed by brief vertexing. The sample was centrifuged at >13,000× g for 1 min. The supernatant was transferred to another 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube and centrifuged again as described above. The supernatant fluid was transferred into a new 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube and an equal volume of isopropyl alcohol was added. The tube was thoroughly mixed by inversion and centrifuged at >13,000× g for 2 min and the supernatant was neglected. The eventual DNA pellet was washed in 300 µL of 70% ethanol, after which it was spun at 10,000 rpm for 1 min and the supernatant was discarded. The DNA pellet was air-dried and dissolved in 50 µL of 1xTris- EDTA. 1 µL of purified DNA was used in 24 µL of PCR mixture [44].

5.2. PCR Amplification

Molecular identification of Trichoderma spp. was carried out based on conserved ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS). The ITS regions between the small nuclear 18S rDNA and large nuclear 28S rDNA, including 5.8S rDNA, were amplified. The forward (ITS-4F) and reverse (ITS-5R) primers (Table 7) used in the PCR reactions to amplify the ITS region of the rRNA operon have been described in [45].
For all PCR mixture contained 10 µL of Red taq ready mix, 0.5 µL of each primer pair, 8 µL of analytical grade sterile water (Sigma–Aldrich) and 5 µL of genomic DNA in a total volume of 24 µL. The thermocycling program used was an initial denaturation (94 °C for 5 min), 30 cycles of denaturation (94 °C for 1 min), annealing (60 °C for 1 min) and elongation (72 °C for 1 min), and then a stabilization (72 °C for 5 min) [45]. The molecular analysis was carried out by Macrogen, Korea.

6. Conclusions

The study concludes that the soil of the Abha region a large population of diverse fungi. Different species of Trichoderma were isolated from the soil. T. harzianum, T. brevicompactum, and T. velutinum showed antagonist ability against plant pathogenic fungi, A. alternata, F. oxysporum and H. rostratum. The volatile compounds of Trichoderma isolates also had the potential to reduce the growth of plant pathogenic fungi. The optimum temperature for their growth was 26 °C. They can tolerate up to 10% salt concentration with best growth at 2%. These Trichoderma species can be explored further to be used as biocontrol agents.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S.A. and K.P.; methodology, A.S.A.; software, A.S.A.; validation, K.P.; formal analysis, A.S.A.; investigation, A.S.A.; resources, A.S.A.; data curation, A.S.A. and K.P.; writing—A.S.A.; writing—review and editing, K.P.; visualization, K.P.; supervision, M.A.; project administration, K.P.; funding acquisition, M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data is available in the manuscript and the soil samples were collected from Abha, Saudi Arabia.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Researchers Support Project (number RSP- 2021/173) of King Saud University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

References

  1. Anees, M.; Azim, R.; Ur Rehman, S.; Jamil, M.; El Hendawy, S.E.; Al-Suhaiban, N.A. Antifungal Potential of Trichoderma Strains Originated from North Western Regions of Pakistan against the Plant pathogens. Pakistan J. Bot. 2018, 50, 2031–2040. [Google Scholar]
  2. Xiao-Yan, S.; Qing-Tao, S.; Shu-Tao, X.; Xiu-Lan, C.; Cai-Yun, S.; Yu-Zhong, Z. Broad-Spectrum Antimicrobial Activity and High Stability of Trichokonins from Trichoderma koningii SMF2 against Plant pathogens. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2006, 260, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Sharma, S.; Kour, D.; Rana, K.L.; Dhiman, A.; Thakur, S.; Thakur, P.; Thakur, S.; Thakur, N.; Sudheer, S.; Yadav, N.; et al. Trichoderma: Biodiversity, Ecological Significances, and Industrial Applications. In Recent Advancement in White Biotechnology through Fungi; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 85–120. [Google Scholar]
  4. Guzmán-Guzmán, P.; Porras-Troncoso, M.D.; Olmedo-Monfil, V.; Herrera-Estrella, A. Trichoderma Species: Versatile Plant Symbionts. Phytopathology 2019, 109, 6–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Nieto-Jacobo, M.F.; Steyaert, J.M.; Salazar-Badillo, F.B.; Vi Nguyen, D.; Rostás, M.; Braithwaite, M.; De Souza, J.T.; Jimenez-Bremont, J.F.; Ohkura, M.; Stewart, A.; et al. Environmental Growth Conditions of Trichoderma spp. Affects Indole Acetic Acid Derivatives, Volatile Organic Compounds, and Plant Growth Promotion. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Wu, Q.; Sun, R.; Ni, M.; Yu, J.; Li, Y.; Yu, C.; Dou, K.; Ren, J.; Chen, J. Identification of a Novel Fungus, Trichoderma asperellum GDFS1009, and Comprehensive Evaluation of Its Biocontrol Efficacy. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gurung, M. Evaluation of Trichoderma Asperellum as Biocontrol Agent for Phytophthora Foot and Root Rot of Citrus. Doctoral Dissertation, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  8. Alsabhan, A.H.; Perveen, K.; Alwadi, A.S. Heavy Metal Content and Microbial Population in the Soil of Riyadh Region, Saudi Arabia. J. King Saud Univ.-Sci. 2022, 34, 101671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Al-Dhabaan, F.A. Mycoremediation of Crude Oil Contaminated Soil by Specific Fungi Isolated from Dhahran in Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mazrou, Y.S.A.; Makhlouf, A.H.; Elseehy, M.M.; Awad, M.F.; Hassan, M.M. Antagonistic Activity and Molecular Characterization of Biological Control Agent Trichoderma harzianum from Saudi Arabia. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 2020, 30, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Elazab, N.T. Diversity and Biological Activities of Endophytic Fungi at Al-Qassim Region. J. Mol. Biol. Res. 2019, 9, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gherbawy, Y.A.; Hussein, N.A.; Al-Qurashi, A.A. Molecular Characterization of Trichoderma Populations Isolated from Soil of Taif City, Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2014, 3, 1059–1071. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dean, R.; Van Kan, J.A.L.; Pretorius, Z.A.; Hammond-Kosack, K.E.; Di Pietro, A.; Spanu, P.D.; Rudd, J.J.; Dickman, M.; Kahmann, R.; Ellis, J.; et al. The Top 10 Fungal Pathogens in Molecular Plant Pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012, 13, 414–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Roy, C.K.; Akter, N.; Sarkar, M.K.I.; Pk, M.U.; Begum, N.; Zenat, E.A.; Jahan, M.A.A. Control of Early Blight of Tomato Caused by Alternaria solani and Screening of Tomato Varieties against the Pathogen. Open Microbiol. J. 2019, 13, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Sunder, S.; Ram, S.; Agarwal, R. Brown Spot of Rice: An Overview Brown Spot of Rice: An Overview. Indian Phytopathol. 2014, 67, 201–215. [Google Scholar]
  16. Anwer, M.A.; Singh, B.K.; Prasad, B.D.; Yadav, A.K.; Kumari, P. Abiotic Stress Tolerant Trichoderma asperellum Tvb1 from Hot Spring and Its Antagonistic Potential Against Soil Borne Phytopathogens. Int. Arch. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2020, 11, 70–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Es-Soufi, R.; Tahiri, H.; Azaroual, L.; El Oualkadi, A.; Martin, P.; Badoc, A.; Lamarti, A. In Vitro Antagonistic Activity of Trichoderma harzianum and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens against Colletotrichum acutatumi. Adv. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. El-katatny, M.H.; Emam, A.S. Control of postharvest tomato rot by spore suspension and antifungal metabolites of Trichoderma harzianum. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2021, 1, 1505–1528. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kullnig, C.; Szakacs, G.; Kubicek, C.P. Molecular Identification of Trichoderma Species from Russia, Siberia and the Himalaya. Mycol. Res. 2000, 104, 1117–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Brunner, K.; Peterbauer, C.K.; Mach, R.L.; Lorito, M.; Zeilinger, S.; Kubicek, C.P. The Nag1 N-Acetylglucosaminidase of Trichoderma atroviride Is Essential for Chitinase Induction by Chitin and of Major Relevance to Biocontrol. Curr. Genet. 2003, 43, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zeilinger, S.; Galhaup, C.; Payer, K.; Woo, S.L.; Mach, R.L.; Fekete, C.; Lorito, M.; Kubicek, C.P. Chitinase Gene Expression during Mycoparasitic Interaction of Trichoderma harzianum with Its Host. Fungal Genet. Biol. 1999, 26, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Küçük, Ç.; Kivanç, M. In vitro antifungal activity of strains of Trichoderma harzianum. Turk. J. Biol. 2004, 28, 111–115. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lorito, M.; Woo, S.L.; D’Ambrosi, M.; Harman, G.E.; Hayes, C.K.; Kubicek, C.P.; Scala, F. Synergistic Interaction between Cell Wall Degrading Enzymes and Membrane Affecting Compounds. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 1996, 9, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Harman, G.E.; Kubicek, C.P. Trichoderma and Gliocladium, Volume 2: Enzymes, Biological Control and Commercial Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kubicek, C.P.; Mach, R.L.; Peterbauer, C.K.; Lorito, M. Trichoderma: From Genes to Biocontrol. J. Plant Pathol. 2001, 83, 11–23. [Google Scholar]
  26. Druzhinina, I.S.; Seidl-Seiboth, V.; Herrera-Estrella, A.; Horwitz, B.A.; Kenerley, C.M.; Monte, E.; Mukherjee, P.K.; Zeilinger, S.; Grigoriev, I.V.; Kubicek, C.P. Trichoderma: The Genomics of Opportunistic Success. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 9, 749–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kredics, L.; Antal, Z.; Manczinger, L.; Szekeres, A.; Kevei, F.; Nagy, E. Influence of Environmental Parameters on Trichoderma Strains with Biocontrol Potential. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2003, 41, 37–42. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hajieghrari, B.; Torabi-Giglou, M.; Mohammadi, M.R.; Davari, M. Biological Potantial of Some Iranian Trichoderma Isolates in the Control of Soil Borne Plant Pathogenic Fungi. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 7, 967–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hewedy, O.A.; Abdel Lateif, K.S.; Seleiman, M.F.; Shami, A.; Albarakaty, F.M.; El-Meihy, R.M. Phylogenetic Diversity of Trichoderma Strains and Their Antagonistic Potential against Soil-Borne Pathogens under Stress Conditions. Biology 2020, 9, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Di Lelio, I.; Coppola, M.; Comite, E.; Molisso, D.; Lorito, M.; Woo, S.L.; Pennacchio, F.; Rao, R.; Digilio, M.C. Temperature Differentially Influences the Capacity of Trichoderma Species to Induce Plant Defense Responses in Tomato Against Insect Pests. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 678830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Poosapati, S.; Durga Ravulapalli, P.; Tippirishetty, N.; Kumar Vishwanathaswamy, D.; Chunduri, S. Selection of High Temperature and Salinity Tolerant Trichoderma Isolates with Antagonistic Activity against Sclerotium rolfsii. SpringerPlus 2014, 3, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Regragui, A.; Lahlou, H. Effect of Salinity on in Vitro Trichoderma harzianum Antagonism against Verticillium dahliae. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2005, 8, 872–876. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gunde-Cimerman, N.; Ramos, J.; Plemenitaš, A. Halotolerant and Halophilic fungi. Mycol. Res. 2009, 113, 1231–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ghildiyal, A.; Pandey, A. Isolation of Cold Tolerant Antifungal Strains of Trichoderma Sp. from Glacial Sites of Indian Himalayan Region. Res. J. Microbiol. 2008, 3, 559–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Zehra, A.; Dubey, M.K.; Meena, M.; Upadhyay, R.S. Effect of Different Environmental Conditions on Growth and Sporulation of Some Trichoderma Species. J. Environ. Biol. 2017, 38, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yusnawan, E.; Taufiq, A.; Wijanarko, A.; Susilowati, D.N.; Praptana, R.H.; Chandra-hioe, M.V.; Supriyo, A.; Inayati, A. Changes in Volatile Organic Compounds from Salt-tolerant Trichoderma and the Biochemical Response and Growth Performance in Saline-stressed Groundnut. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Castillo, F.D.H.; Berlanga Padilla, A.M.; Gallegos Morales, G.; Cepeda Siller, M.; Rodriguez Herrera, R.; Aguilar Gonzales, C.N.; Castillo Reyes, F. In Vitro Antagonist Action of Trichoderma Strains against Sclerotinia Sclerotiorum and Sclerotium Cepivorum. Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2011, 6, 410–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Perveen, K.; Bokhari, N.A. Antagonistic Activity of Trichoderma harzianum and Trichoderma viride Isolated from Soil of Date Palm Field against Fusarium oxysporum. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2012, 6, 3348–3353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mazrou, Y.S.A.; Baazeem, A.; Makhlouf, A.H.; Sabry, A.; Ismail, M.; Hassan, M.M. Comparative Molecular Genetic Diversity between Trichoderma Spp. from Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 2020, 30, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Henrique Fantin, L.; Lúcia de Souza Madureira Felício, A.; Hideki Sumida, C.; Marcelo Gonçalves, R.; Braga, K.; Alexandre de França, J.; Giovanetti Canteri, M. Characterisation of Trichoderma Strains Using FTIR-ATR Spectroscopy and Molecular Analysis. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2022, 162, 945–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Abha. Available online: https://goo.gl/maps/i6V7nWWtKxk6nQWMA (accessed on 2 January 2022).
  42. Jaklitsch, W.M.; Voglmayr, H. Biodiversity of Trichoderma (Hypocreaceae) in Southern Europe and Macaronesia. Stud. Mycol. 2015, 80, 1–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Samuels, G.J.; Dodd, S.L.; Gams, W.; Castlebury, L.A.; Petrini, O. Trichoderma Species Associated with the Green Mold Epidemic of Commercially Grown Agaricus bisporus. Mycologia 2002, 94, 146–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, D.; Coloe, S.; Baird, R.; Pedersen, J. Rapid Mini-Preparation of Fungal DNA for PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gu, X.; Wang, R.; Sun, Q.; Wu, B.; Sun, J.Z. Four New Species of Trichoderma in the Harzianum Clade from Northern China. MycoKeys 2020, 73, 109–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Effect of volatile metabolites of Trichoderma on the growth of plant pathogenic fungi.
Figure 1. Effect of volatile metabolites of Trichoderma on the growth of plant pathogenic fungi.
Molecules 27 02525 g001
Figure 2. Inhibitory effect of the culture filtrate of Trichoderma isolates.
Figure 2. Inhibitory effect of the culture filtrate of Trichoderma isolates.
Molecules 27 02525 g002
Figure 3. Trichoderma isolate (A (1) 2.1 T) (analysis of 18S rDNA of the T. harzianum (MF871551.1), with primers ITS4 and ITS5 in NCBI GenBank respectively).
Figure 3. Trichoderma isolate (A (1) 2.1 T) (analysis of 18S rDNA of the T. harzianum (MF871551.1), with primers ITS4 and ITS5 in NCBI GenBank respectively).
Molecules 27 02525 g003
Figure 4. Trichoderma isolate (A (3) 3.1 T) (analysis of 18S rDNA of the T. brevicompactum (KR094463.1), with primers ITS4 and ITS5 in NCBI GenBank respectively).
Figure 4. Trichoderma isolate (A (3) 3.1 T) (analysis of 18S rDNA of the T. brevicompactum (KR094463.1), with primers ITS4 and ITS5 in NCBI GenBank respectively).
Molecules 27 02525 g004
Figure 5. Trichoderma isolate (A (6) 2.2 T) (analysis of 18S rDNA of the T. velutinum (EU280080.1), with primers ITS4 and ITS5 in NCBI GenBank respectively).
Figure 5. Trichoderma isolate (A (6) 2.2 T) (analysis of 18S rDNA of the T. velutinum (EU280080.1), with primers ITS4 and ITS5 in NCBI GenBank respectively).
Molecules 27 02525 g005
Figure 6. Location of soil samples collections sites, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Figure 6. Location of soil samples collections sites, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Molecules 27 02525 g006
Table 1. The colony-forming units (CFU) of total fungi on PDA and Trichoderma on TSM in the soil samples collected from the Abha region.
Table 1. The colony-forming units (CFU) of total fungi on PDA and Trichoderma on TSM in the soil samples collected from the Abha region.
S. NOSoil Sample CodeCFU/g of Soil on PDA (102)CFU/g of Soil on TSM (102)
1A12131
2A2168.3
3A345.352
4A42116.3
5A525.383
6A627.356.3
Table 2. Total radial growth (mm) and growth rate (mm/day) of different isolates of Trichoderma spp., on PDA.
Table 2. Total radial growth (mm) and growth rate (mm/day) of different isolates of Trichoderma spp., on PDA.
S. NoIsolate CodeTotal Radial Growth (mm)Growth Rate (mm/day)
1A (1) 1.181.211.6
2A (1) 2.254.67.8
3A (1) 1.2 T80.511.5
4A (1) 1.4 T79.811.4
5A (1) 2.125.23.6
6A (1) 2.1 T8528.7
7A (1) 2.3 T856.7
8A (1) 2.4 T8514.5
9A (1) 3.1 T13.31.9
10A (1) 3.2 T9.81.4
11A (1) 3.3 T45.56.5
12A (1) 3.4 T44.16.3
13A (2) 1.1 T426
14A (2) 1.2 T27.33.9
15A (2) 1.3 T70.710.1
16A (2) 1.4 T39.95.7
17A (2) 2.1 T53.97.7
18A (2) 3.1 T66.59.5
19A (2) 3.2 T81.911.7
20A (3) 1.1 T14.72.1
21A (3) 1.2 T57.48.2
22A (3) 1.3 T36.45.2
23A (3) 2.1 T65.19.3
24A (3) 2.2T53.97.7
25A (3) 2.3 T37.85.4
26A (3) 3.1 T8514.5
27A (3) 3.2 T52.57.5
28A (3) 3.4 T64.49.2
29A (4) 1.181.211.6
30A (4) 1.2 T47.66.8
31A (4) 2.156.78.1
32A (4) 2.1 T45.56.5
33A (4) 2.2 T49.77.1
34A (4) 3.246.26.6
35A (5) 1.1 T81.911.7
36A (5) 1.2 T77.711.1
37A (5) 1.4 T72.110.3
38A (5) 2.1 T284
39A (5) 2.2 T73.510.5
40A (5) 3.1 T43.46.2
41A (5) 3.2 T50.47.2
42A (5) 3.3 T30.14.3
43A (5) 3.4 T27.33.9
44A (6) 1.2 T83.311.9
45A (6) 1.3 T8412
46A (6) 2.1 T6.379
47A (6) 2.2T8.5185
48A (6) 3.1 T81.211.6
Table 3. Antagonistic activity of Trichoderma spp. against A. alternata, F. oxysporum, and H. rostratum evaluated by dual culture interaction.
Table 3. Antagonistic activity of Trichoderma spp. against A. alternata, F. oxysporum, and H. rostratum evaluated by dual culture interaction.
CodeA. alternataF. oxysporumH. rostratum
Percent Inhibition (%)
A (1) 2.1 T66 ± 0.8282 ± 0.4740 ± 0.82
A (1) 2.3 T28 ± 0.8219 ± 0.8210 ± 1.25
A (1) 2.4 T16 ± 0.8222 ± 0.8235 ± 0.82
A (3) 3.1 T61 ± 0.8264 ± 0.8251± 0.47
A (6) 2.1 T55 ± 1.2519 ± 0.8218 ± 0.82
A (6) 2.2 T57 ± 1.2562 ± 0.0077 ± 0.82
Table 4. Effect of different temperature on the growth of Trichoderma isolates.
Table 4. Effect of different temperature on the growth of Trichoderma isolates.
CodeTemp.Radial Growth (mm)
A (1) 2.1 T26 °C85 ± 0.00
30 °C85 ± 0.00
45 °C5 ± 0.00
50 °C5 ± 0.00
A (1) 2.3 T26 °C85 ± 2.05
30 °C37 ± 23.37
45 °C5 ± 0.00
50 °C5 ± 0.00
A (1) 2.4 T26 °C85 ± 0.00
30 °C85 ± 2.36
45 °C5 ± 0.00
50 °C5 ± 0.00
A (3) 3.1 T26 °C85 ± 0.00
30 °C40 ± 18.71
45 °C5 ± 0.00
50 °C5 ± 0.00
A (6) 2.1 T26 °C79 ± 2.62
30 °C7 ± 0.47
45 °C5 ± 0.00
50 °C5 ± 0.00
A (6) 2.2 T26 °C85 ± 0.00
30 °C85 ± 5.73
45 °C5 ± 0.00
50 °C5 ± 0.00
Table 5. Effect of different salt concentrations on the growth of Trichoderma isolates.
Table 5. Effect of different salt concentrations on the growth of Trichoderma isolates.
CodeSalinityRadial Growth (mm)
A (1) 2.1 T0%85 ± 0.00
2%85 ± 0.00
4%75.7 ± 3.30
6%55.3 ± 1.70
8%24.3 ± 1.25
10%8.3 ± 0.47
A (1) 2.3 T0%85 ± 0.00
2%56 ± 1.41
4%57.7 ± 2.05
6%57 ± 16.57
8%54.2 ± 2.36
10%34.3 ± 11.15
A (1) 2.4 T0%85 ± 0.00
2%53 ± 2.45
4%49 ± 9.90
6%43.7 ± 4.64
8%37.7 ± 12.28
10%25 ± 4.55
A (3) 3.1 T0%85 ± 0.00
2%74.7 ± 2.62
4%33.3 ± 4.03
6%27.3 ± 5.25
8%6 ± 0.00
10%5 ± 0.00
A (6) 2.1 T0%85 ± 0.00
2%36.3 ± 13.96
4%26.7 ± 3.30
6%43.3 ± 13.02
8%20.3 ± 0.47
10%22.7 ± 2.36
A (6) 2.2 T0%85 ± 0.00
2%85 ± 0.00
4%51 ± 6.38
6%34 ± 2.16
8%9.7 ± 0.94
10%5 ± 0.00
Table 6. The location of soil sample collections sites, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Table 6. The location of soil sample collections sites, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
S. No.CodeLocation of Sample Collection [41]Date of Collection
1(A1)
Forest
Al-soudah2 Junly 2019
2(A2)
Agricultural soil
Al-badiei2 Junly 2019
3(A3)
Agricultural soil
Al Areen2 Junly 2019
4(A4)
Rocky soil
Almuazafina2 Junly 2019
5(A5)
Soil near the water
Ain al-Dhibah16 Junly 2019
6(A6)
Soil near the water
Sad wadi eashran15 Junly 2019
Table 7. The ITS primer pair was used in the PCR reactions to amplify the ITS region.
Table 7. The ITS primer pair was used in the PCR reactions to amplify the ITS region.
PrimerSequence 5′ 3′
ITS5 (forward)GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG
ITS4 (reverse)TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alwadai, A.S.; Perveen, K.; Alwahaibi, M. The Isolation and Characterization of Antagonist Trichoderma spp. from the Soil of Abha, Saudi Arabia. Molecules 2022, 27, 2525. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27082525

AMA Style

Alwadai AS, Perveen K, Alwahaibi M. The Isolation and Characterization of Antagonist Trichoderma spp. from the Soil of Abha, Saudi Arabia. Molecules. 2022; 27(8):2525. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27082525

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alwadai, Aisha Saleh, Kahkashan Perveen, and Mona Alwahaibi. 2022. "The Isolation and Characterization of Antagonist Trichoderma spp. from the Soil of Abha, Saudi Arabia" Molecules 27, no. 8: 2525. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27082525

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop