Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of a Naphthalocyanine-Like Dye: The First Report on Zn(II)-1,6-methano[10]annulenecyanine
Previous Article in Journal
The Quaternization Reaction of 5-O-Sulfonates of Methyl 2,3-o-Isopropylidene-β-D-Ribofuranoside with Selected Heterocyclic and Aliphatic Amines
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 9
10.3390/molecules25092159
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Oxindole-Bridged Acceptors for Organic Sensitizers: Substitution and Performance Studies in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

by
Yogesh S. Tingare
1,*,
Chaochin Su
1,*,
Ming-Tai Shen
2,
Sheng-Han Tsai
1,
Shih-Yu Ho
1 and
Wen-Ren Li
2,*
1
Institute of Organic and Polymeric Materials/Research and Development Center for Smart Textile Technology, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan
2
Department of Chemistry, National Central University, Chung-Li 32001, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(9), 2159; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25092159
Submission received: 5 April 2020 / Revised: 26 April 2020 / Accepted: 3 May 2020 / Published: 5 May 2020
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
New D-π-A configured organic sensitizers featuring halogen-substituted oxindole-bridged acceptor units have been synthesized for dye-sensitized solar cells applications. Among fluorine, bromine, and iodine substitution, the cell based on bromine incorporated dye exhibited the highest efficiency. The oxindoles in these sensitizers were found to assist the electron injection through the chelation of their amide carbonyl groups to the TiO2 surface. This study provides an alternate approach for future rational dye design to gain excellent DSSC performance.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Energy harvesting directly from the sunlight using the photovoltaic technology is being increasingly recognized as an essential strategy for future global energy production [1]. Finding energy generating devices using inexpensive and environment-friendly materials has become a well-focused academic and industrial research topic. The solar-to-power converting assembly, known as dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs), introduced by O’Regan and Grätzel has attracted a significant amount of attention [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. The technology has shown a great potential to assist as an efficient, low production cost, and clean energy source. To achieve excellent solar power conversion efficiencies in DSSCs, considerable attention has been focused on designing and synthesizing various photosensitizers [10,11,16,17,18,19,20]. For the past decades, the sensitizers like ruthenium (II) polypyridyl complexes [21,22,23,24,25,26,27] and zinc-based porphyrin dyes [28,29,30,31,32,33] have dominated DSSCs as efficient sensitizers with their outstanding power conversion efficiencies. But the cost, toxicity and limited availability of the metals, as specially the ruthenium, have inspired researcher to pursue alternative sensitizing dyes for DSSC. Parallelly, the ongoing research on perovskite solar cells [34,35] is found to be promising with efficiency exceeding over 20%. But the use of environmentally harmful lead-based materials and instability in these devices have raised some major concerns [36,37]. On the other hand, the metal free organic dyes have kept a considerable interest with their robust availability, flexibility of structural tuning, and high molar extinction coefficients which make them competitive alternatives to the other sensitizers [38,39].
Typically, metal-free organic dyes are configured with donor-π-bridge˗acceptor structures. As per the literature reports, in-depth studies have been directed towards the modification of the donors and the π-bridge moieties of the organic dyes but only a few developments were made in the acceptor groups [10,40,41,42]. The most commonly used acceptors (anchoring groups) are carboxylic acid or cyanoacrylic acid [9]. But the cyanoacrylic acid acceptor was reported to exhibit some disadvantages, such as lower photostabilities due to presence of double bond and dominating redox properties because of strong electronegative nitrile moiety [43]. It was also reported that the nitrile group of the cyanoacrylic acid affected the acidity of the adjacent carboxylic acid which can give a negative influence on the binding to the TiO2 surface [44,45]. Several attempts have been made to replace the strong electron-withdrawing cyano group and construct new acceptor systems to achieve high absorptivity and good photostability [46,47,48,49]. The acceptor moiety of the dye shows a significant influence on the spectral response and the device performance. Therefore, there is a need to further explore various acceptors and expand “design principles” to help guide metal-free dye discovery.
The oxindoles are natural indole alkaloids and can be isolated from the plants [50]. Although oxindoles are ubiquitous within the pharmaceutical industry [51,52,53], the potential of oxindoles to act as sensitizing materials [54] has not been investigated by other groups and need to be studied thoroughly. We unprecedentedly visualize oxindoles as new acceptors for the organic sensitizers. It is our speculation that the amide group of the oxindole dye will not only act as an electron acceptor but also can direct the electron injection because of its chelation to the TiO2 surface [54]. Furthermore, it is located near the anchoring group which will help to accelerate the electron transfer to the TiO2 due to the shorter distance. The non-conjugated carboxylic acid group incorporated in the end of the dye will act as efficient binding group without affect the push–pull capability of the acceptor. Effect of halogens substituted on the donor moiety of the dye was also studied and was found to effectively contribute to the enhancement of the open-circuit voltage and the overall cell efficiency [55].
In this article, we designed and synthesized a series of new oxindole sensitizers (TI111–TI116, Figure 1a) which exhibited respectable photoelectric conversion efficiencies (η). These sensitizers have an excellent electron-donating triphenylamine (TPA) donor and the thiophene in the spacer and are differentiated by various halogen-substituted oxindole acceptors. The electronegative fluorine (F) element is well known for its application in the field of organic light-emitting diodes as well as in the artificial amino acid synthesis [56,57,58,59,60]. The alteration in the Fermi levels of the dye could be achieved by using F substituent in the acceptor of the dye, which usually accounts for an increase in the open-circuit voltage of the dye by reducing the dark current [58]. We incorporated an F atom in the parent compound TI111, forming TI112, to alter the photo-physical properties of the oxindole dye. The comparative studies of different halogen substituents in the donor part of sensitizers have been evaluated [55], but their effects on the sensitizing properties of dyes when substituted near the acceptors have not been reported. Therefore we further extended our investigation and designed TI114, and TI115 in which bromine (Br), and iodine (I) substituents were incorporated, respectively. Additionally, it is noted that the variation in the position of the substituent with respect to the anchoring group can deliver different cell performances [58]. Thus, we designed TI114 analogue, TI116, to study the effect of position of the substitution on the conversion efficiency of the DSSC.

2. Results and Discussion

Scheme 1 depicts the syntheses of new sensitizers TI111–TI115 that started with a Knoevenagel condensation reaction using amides 1a–d and 5-[4-(diphenylamino)phenyl]thiophene-2-carbaldehyde (2) [54] to yield condensed compounds 3a–d as single Z-isomers. Oxindoles 3a–d were then alkylated with methyl bromoacetate in the presence of base and tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBAB) to afford esters 4a–d. Finally, sensitizers TI111–TI115 were obtained after basic hydrolysis of their corresponding esters. As shown in Scheme 2, the preparation of the sensitizer TI116 began with a microwave-assisted Wittig reaction. 6-Bromo-1H-indole-2, 3-dione (5), aldehyde 2, PPh3, and toluene were combined in a microwave reaction vessel and irradiated in the Synthos 3000 microwave oven at 300W for 4 h to yield the desired product 6. Ester 7 was synthesized through alkylation of compound 6 with methyl bromo acetate. Basic hydrolysis of the resulting ester 7 successfully provided the required sensitizer TI116. The molecular geometries of TI112 and TI116 dyes were confirmed through single-crystal structural analysis of their corresponding esters 4b and 7, respectively (Figure 1b,c; Tables S1 and S2 in the Supporting Information). As shown in the X-ray structures, the stereogenic double bonds present in oxindoles are arranged in Z configuration.
The optical properties of these dyes were investigated using UV/Vis absorption spectroscopy and shown in Figure 2. The absorption spectrum of the parent dye TI111 features λmax of 469 nm [molar absorption coefficient (ε) =3.77 × 104 M−1 cm−1] which is attributed to the delocalized π-π* transition (Figure 2a). The halogen substituents played an important role in the absorption properties of the corresponding dyes. The λmax of the dyes TI112 (480 nm, ε =3.05 × 104 M−1 cm−1) with F substituent was found to red-shift 11 nm. However, decrease in molar extinction coefficient was observed when compared to the non-substituted dye TI111. Nevertheless, dye TI114 (λmax = 483 nm, ε = 3.88 × 104 M−1 cm−1) with Br substituent exhibited the highest λmax and ε. Surprisingly, dye TI115 (λmax = 483 nm, ε = 3.47 × 104 M−1 cm−1) showed lower ε in which Br is replaced with I substituent. These results revealed that, in comparison to other halogenated dyes, the Br substitution in the oxindole dye was more effective towards improving the light-harvesting capacity. It is interesting to note that, changing the position of substituent with respect to the anchoring group in TI116 showed a steep decrease in the absorption intensity, compared to the TI114 dye which might have resonance interaction of the substituent with the anchoring group. Mostly, organic dyes featured blue-shifts in the absorption bands when attached onto the TiO2 surface. Such a phenomenon was attributed to deprotonation of the carboxylic acid or the formation of aggregation of the sensitizers [61,62,63,64,65,66]. The UV/Vis absorption spectra of oxindole dyes anchored onto TiO2 films (Figure 2b) were broadened. Compared to the solutions, sensitizers TI112–TI115 on films exhibited stronger adsorption than the dye TI111.
The HOMO and LUMO energy levels of the sensitizer play an important role in affecting the dye-regeneration and electron-transfer processes in DSSCs. Table 1 reveals that the HOMO levels of these dyes are lower than that of I−/I3− redox potential, assuring regeneration of the oxidized dyes by the redox couple in the electrolyte. The LUMO levels of the sensitizers TI111–TI116 were adequate for efficient electron injection and the halogen substitutions do not alter the energy levels of these dyes. To gain further insight into the frontier orbital profiles, the locations of the HOMOs and LUMOs of oxindole dyes were calculated using a semiempirical computation method. The molecular orbital calculations showed that the HOMO orbital of each dye is localized to the electron-rich TPA moiety (Figure 3a and Figure S2 in the Supporting Information). Interestingly, in each oxindole dye, the LUMO level is confined to the amide portion of the molecule and does not extend to the non-conjugated anchoring carboxylate moiety. These calculations indicate that each oxindole dye is poised for effective electron injection through the amide group rather than the anchoring carboxylate moiety. To confirm this inference and explore the electron injection mechanism in the oxindoles, FTIR spectra of TI114 powder and the dye adsorbed on TiO2 were measured. The characteristic band for the amide carbonyl group of the oxindole dye TI114 powder was observed at 1678 cm−1 (Figure 3b). When the dye was adsorbed on the TiO2 surface, the peak for C=O stretching disappeared which clearly verified the chelation of the amide carbonyl group of the oxindole dye to the TiO2 surface. With such chelations, oxindole sensitizers are expected to improve photo-induced electron injection yields.
Table 2 summarizes the cell performance of the DSSCs anchored with oxindole dyes: short-circuit photocurrent densities (Jsc), open-circuit voltages (Voc), fill factors (FFs), and solar-to-electricity conversion efficiencies (η). Figure 4 presents their corresponding photocurrent density–voltage (I–V) curves, incident photo-to-current efficiency (IPCE) spectra and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The parent dye TI111 exhibited Jsc = 10.03 mA cm−2, Voc = 680 mV, and FF = 0.699, corresponding to an overall η = 4.76% (Table 2). Furthermore, incorporating the halogen substitutions in the oxindole dyes enhanced the device conversion efficiencies. The DSSC based on the F-substituted TI112 sensitizer achieved Jsc = 11.32 mA cm−2, Voc = 690 mV, and FF = 0.695, corresponding to an overall η = 5.43%, which was approximately 14% higher than that of the non-substituted oxindole sensitizer TI111. The enhanced η was due to its increase in the Jsc which could be attributed to the electronic coupling of F with the anchoring group [58]. Replacing the F with other halogen substituents in the oxindoles showed further enhancement in the DSSC performance. Among all the halogen substituted sensitizers reported in this study, the Br incorporated sensitizer TI114 exhibited the highest photovoltaic parameters (Jsc = 12.46 mA cm−2, Voc = 720 mV, and FF = 0.708) with an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 6.35%. The improved photocurrent of the TI114 sensitizer suggests that compared to F substitution, the Br-substituted dye can exhibit better cell performance. Also, compared to the dye with the traditional cyanoacrylic acid acceptor bearing the same TPA donor-π-bridge moiety [67], the sensitizer with the Br-substituted oxindole acceptor seems to be more impressive. Surprisingly, changing the position of the substituent with respect to the anchoring group exhibited negative effect on the solar cell performance. The TI116 anchored DSSC showed lower current density (Jsc = 9.66 mA cm−2, Voc = 630 mV, and FF = 0.690), that is corresponding to an overall η = 4.21%, which may be due to the absence of electronic coupling of substitution with the anchoring group. In order to gain more insight into the electron transport of oxindole dyes, the electrochemical impedance of the cells was measured under illumination and is shown in Figure 4c. The fitted EIS data, the charge transfer resistance related to the recombination of electrons at the interface (Rk), the electron transport resistance in the photoanode (Rw), the effective rate constant for recombination (keff), the electron lifetime in the photoanode (τ), the effective electron diffusion coefficient (Deff), and the electron diffusion length (Ln) are compiled in Table S4 in SI. The radii of the semicircles in the EIS spectra of the DSSCs based on oxindole dyes, according to the Nyquist plot, is in the order of TI116 > TI111 > TI112 > TI115 > TI114. These results indicate that the charge transport is in the order of TI114 > TI115 > TI112 > TI111 > TI116, which agrees with the overall device performances. Also, the life time (τ) values shown in Table S4 indicates that the capacity to suppress the back reaction of the electron with the I3− in the electrolyte are affected by the different halogen substituent on the oxindole moiety. The measured τ is in the order of TI114 = TI112 > TI115 = TI111 > TI116 and is consistent with those of Voc determined experimentally (see Table 2). Among all the sensitizers studied here, the dye TI114 showed the highest charge transport, lowest electron transport resistance and better electron lifetime which have led enhancement in its Voc and efficiency. The IPCE of the device using the TI111 sensitizer exceeded 50% in the spectral region ranging from 425 to 565 nm and reached a maximum of 52% (Figure 4b). Incorporating halogen substituents in the sensitizers displayed red-shifted ranges and increasing IPCE maxima. The dye TI114 with the Br substituent exhibited the maximum IPCE value of 60% at 585 nm, which was the highest among the listed oxindole dyes. Similar to the I–V curve (Figure 4a), altering the position of the substituent also resulted in a lower IPCE value as well as a blue shift for dye TI116 (a maximum of 43% at 445 nm). Based on these analyses and the previous report [58], we can estimate that the halogen substituent, particularly positioned para to the anchoring group, can have strong impact on the device performance of the sensitizer. We believe that the effectiveness of electron transport, the proper balance of Fermi level, and controlling affinity of the acceptors towards the semiconductor are the crucial factors affecting device performances of oxindole-based DSSCs. Such factors cannot be predicted intuitively and their physical origins need to be further addressed in future work.

3. Materials and Methods

General procedure for syntheses of compounds 3(a–d): In a 100 mL round bottom flask 5-[4-(diphenylamino) phenyl] thiophene-2-carbaldehyde (2) (12 mmol) was treated with the appropriate oxindole (1a–d) (10 mmol) and piperidine (1 mmol) in 20 mL of ethanol. After the reaction mixture was refluxed for 6 h, it was cooled and the resulting precipitate was filtered, washed with cold ethanol, and dried to give the target compounds (70–90% yield).
(Z)-3-((5-(4-(Diphenylamino)phenyl)thiophen-2-yl)methylene)indolin-2-one (3a; 3.8 g, 82.79%): 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.64 (s, 1H); 8.05 (s, 1H); 7.89 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 1H); 7.68 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H); 7.66 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H); 7.52 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H); 7.35 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 4H); 7.20 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H); 7.14–7.08 (m, 6H); 7.02–6.97 (m, 3H); 6.88 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 167.8; 150.9; 148.1; 147.1; 140.8; 139.7; 136.4; 130.1; 128.7; 128.5; 127.5; 127.3; 125.1; 124.9; 124.2; 123.6; 122.9; 121.3; 121.3; 119.7; 109.9. HRMS (FAB) (m/z [M + H]+) calcd for C31H23N2OS, 471.1526; found 471.1513.
(Z)-3-((5-(4-(Diphenylamino)phenyl)thiophen-2-yl)methylene)-5-fluoroindolin-2-one (3b; 3.4 g, 70.69%): 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.63 (s, 1H); 8.14 (s, 1H); 7.89 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H);7.67 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H); 7.60 (dd, J = 9, 2.4 Hz, 1H); 7.55 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H); 7.37 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 4H); 7.14 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H); 7.10 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 5H); 7.01 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 6.84 (dd, J = 8.4, 4.5 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 167.9; 159.8; 156.7; 151.7; 148.2; 147.0; 140.3; 137.0; 136.1; 130.1; 127.4; 127.3; 126.5; 126.4; 125.1; 124.2; 123.7; 122.8; 120.8 (d, J = 7.5 Hz); 114.7 (d, J = 22.5 Hz); 110.4 (d, J = 7.5 Hz); 107 (d, J = 24.7 Hz). HRMS (FAB) (m/z [M]+) calcd for C31H21FN2OS, 488.1353; found 488.1350.
(Z)-5-bromo-3-((5-(4-(Diphenylamino)phenyl)thiophen-2-yl)methylene)indolin-2-one (3c; 4.2 g, 76.45%): [54]: 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.75 (s, 1H); 8.22 (s, 1H); 7.93 (s, 1H); 7.89 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H); 7.69 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H); 7.57 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H); 7.40–7.35 (m, 5H); 7.16–7.10 (m, 6H); 7.02 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 6.83 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 167.4; 151.9; 148.3; 147.0; 140.6; 139.7; 136.2; 130.7; 130.4; 130.2; 127.5; 127.3; 127.2; 125.1; 124.3; 123.8; 122.7; 122.4; 119.8; 113.3; 111.7. HRMS (FAB) (m/z [M + H]+) calcd for C31H22BrN2OS, 549.0631; found 549.0620.
(Z)-3-((5-(4-(Diphenylamino)phenyl)thiophen-2-yl)methylene)-5-iodoindolin-2-one (3d; 5.2 g, 86.95%): 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.71 (s, 1H); 8.19 (s, 1H); 8.07 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H); 7.90 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H); 7.68 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 7.56 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H); 7.51 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.5 Hz, 1H); 7.37 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 4H); 7.15 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H); 7.11 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 4H); 7.02 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 6.72 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 167.2; 151.8; 148.2; 147.0; 140.5; 140.1; 136.5; 136.2; 130.1; 127.9; 127.7; 127.4; 127.2; 125.1; 124.2; 123.7; 122.8; 119.6; 112.2; 84.3. HRMS (FAB) (m/z [M]+) calcd for C31H21IN2OS, 596.0414; found 596.0413.
General procedure for syntheses of compounds 4(a–d): To a solution of compound 3(a–d) (10 mmol) in dimethylformamide (50 mL), potassium carbonate (12 mmol) was added and stirred for 30 min. Methyl bromoacetate (12 mmol) and tetrabutylammonium bromide (1 mmol) were then added and reaction mixture was continued stirring at room temperature for 48 h. The reaction mixture was diluted by ethyl acetate (30 mL) and the salt formed was removed by filtration and washed with ethyl acetate (6 mL). The solution was then concentrated under reduced pressure. The resulting residue was purified by column chromatography (SiO2; CH2Cl2) to yield ester compounds (60–65% yield).
Methyl (Z)-2-(3-((5-(4-(diphenylamino)phenyl)thiophen-2-yl)methylene)-2-oxoindolin-1-yl)acetate (4a; 2.81 g, 64.15%): 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.17 (s, 1H); 7.89 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 1H); 7.75 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H); 7.67 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H); 7.56 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H); 7.35 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 4H); 7.25 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H) 7.14–7.09 (m, 7H); 7.06 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H); 7.01 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 2H); 4.69 (s, 2H); 3.69 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.5; 166.3; 152.5; 148.3; 147.2; 140.4; 139.1; 136.2; 129.4; 129.0; 128.0; 127.4; 127.1; 124.9; 124.1; 123.5; 122.9; 122.5; 122.1; 119.2; 118.7; 107.9; 52.5; 41.0. HRMS (FAB) (m/z [M + H]+) calcd for C34H27N2O3S, 543.1737; found 543.1732.
Methyl (Z)-2-(3-((5-(4-(diphenylamino)phenyl)thiophen-2-yl)methylene)-5-fluoro-2-oxoindolin-1-yl)acetate (4b; 2.39 g, 61.43%): 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.29 (s, 1H); 7.91 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 1H); 7.71 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H); 7.61 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H); 7.38 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 4H); 7.15-7.10 (m, 9H); 7.10 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 2H); 4.72 (s, 2H); 3.72 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.4; 166.2; 161.2; 159.8; 153.4; 148.4; 147.1; 139.8; 136.3; 135.8; 130.1; 129.4; 127.1; 124.9; 123.6; 122.7; 122.6; 118.6; 114.1 (d, J = 22.5 Hz); 108.3 (d, J = 7.5 Hz); 106.1 (d, J = 22.5 Hz); 52.5; 41.1. HRMS (FAB) (m/z [M]+) calcd for C34H25FN2O3S, 560.1564; found 560.1568.
Methyl (Z)-2-(5-bromo-3-((5-(4-(diphenylamino)phenyl)thiophen-2-yl)methylene)-2-oxoindolin-1-yl)acetate (4c; 3.02 g, 63.84%) 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.35 (s, 1H); 8.03 (s, 1H); 7.91 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H); 7.70 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 7.60 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H) 7.44 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H); 7.38 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 4H); 7.17–7.10 (m, 6H); 7.06 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H); 7.01 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 4.72 (s, 2H); 3.71 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.3; 165.8; 153.5; 148.4; 140.1; 139.0; 135.8; 130.2; 130.2; 129.4; 127.1; 126.1; 125.0; 123.6; 122.7; 121.6; 117.6; 114.8; 109.3. HRMS (FAB) (m/z [M + H]+) calcd for C34H26BrN2O3S, 621.0842; found 621.0841.
Methyl (Z)-2-(3-((5-(4-(diphenylamino)phenyl)thiophen-2-yl)methylene)-5-iodo-2-oxoindolin-1-yl)acetate (4d; 4.63 g, 64.84%) 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.28 (s, 1H); 8.13 (s, 1H); 7.89 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H); 7.66 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H); 7.57 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H); 7.55 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H); 7.36 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 4H); 7.15–7.08 (m, 6H); 6.99 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H); 6.92 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H); 4.69 (s, 2H); 3.71 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.0; 165.5; 152.5; 148.4; 147.0; 141.2; 140.3; 136.4; 136.1; 131.3; 130.1; 127.8; 127.4; 127.0; 126.6; 125.2; 124.3; 123.8; 122.6; 117.6; 111.5; 85.4; 52.7; 41.2. HRMS (FAB) (m/z [M]+) calcd for C34H25IN2O3S, 668.0625; found 668.0622.
General procedure for syntheses of sensitizers TI111–TI115: Compound 4(a–d) (9 mmol) was dissolved in THF (6 mL) and 0.5 M NaOH(aq.) (18 mmol) was added to the solution, which was then stirred at room temperature for 6 h. After the hydrolysis was completed, the solvent was evaporated. Ethanol (5 mL) was added and the resulting precipitate was filtered, washed with cold ethanol (0.5 mL), and dried. The precipitate were then dissolved in water (10 mL) and 0.5 M HCl(aq.) was added to precipitate the product. The solid was filtered, washed with water (3 × 6 mL) and dried under vacuum to afford target sensitizers (80–90% yield).
Dye TI111 (2.35 g, 86.08%): 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.32 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H); 7.85 (s, 2H); 7.73 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H); 7.60 (d, J = 4 Hz, 1H); 7.37–7.32 (m, 5H); 7.14–7.05 (m, 8H); 6.99 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H); 4.54 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.9; 168.6; 150.0; 148.4; 146.9; 143.1; 139.4; 135.5; 130.1; 129.8; 128.5; 127.6; 126.5; 125.2; 124.4; 124.3; 123.6; 122.6; 122.4; 121.2; 120.6; 109.4; 41.6. HRMS (FAB) (m/z [M + H]+) calcd for C33H25N2O3S, 529.1580; found 529.1570.
Dye TI112 (2.38 g, 80.13%): 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.24 (s, 1H); 7.91(d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H); 7.71 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H); 7.66 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H); 7.59 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H); 7.38 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 4H); 7.17–7.11 (m, 8H); 7.02 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H); 4.52 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.8; 168.4; 159.1; 157.3; 150.8; 148.5; 146.9; 140.2; 139.4; 135.0; 130.1; 127.6; 126.2; 125.2; 124.6; 124.4; 122.4; 121.5; (d, J = 8.8 Hz); 120.5; 115.9 (d, J = 40 Hz); 110.5 (d, J = 41.2 Hz); 41.7. HRMS (FAB) (m/z [M]+) calcd for C33H23FN2O3S, 546.1408; found 546.1405.
Dye TI114 (2.63 g, 89.15%): 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.29 (s, 1H); 7.87 (s, 2H); 7.64 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H); 7.59 (s, 1H); 7.49 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H); 7.34 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 4H); 7.13–7.04 (m, 7H); 6.97 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H); 4.53 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.7; 168.1; 150.7; 148.7; 146.9; 142.2; 140.3; 135.0; 132.0; 130.2; 127.6; 126.1; 125.3; 124.8; 124.4; 122.7; 122.4; 120.0; 113.9; 111.4; 41.7. HRMS (FAB) (m/z [M]+) calcd for C33H23BrN2O3S, 606.0613; found 606.0603.
Dye TI115 (3.23 g, 87.53%): 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.28 (s, 1H); 8.11 (s, 1H); 7.88 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H); 7.68 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H); 7.56 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H); 7.34 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 4H); 7.11-7.08 (m, 7H); 6.98 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, 2H); 6.89 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H); 4.53 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.9; 165.5; 152.3; 148.3; 147.0; 141.0; 140.7; 136.3; 136.1; 131.0; 130.1; 127.7; 127.4; 127.1; 126.5; 125.3; 125.2; 124.3; 123.8; 122.6; 117.9; 111.5; 85.2; 41.5. HRMS (FAB) (m/z [M]+) calcd for C33H23IN2O3S, 654.0469; found 654.0467.
(Z)-6-bromo-3-((5-(4-(Diphenylamino)phenyl)thiophen-2-yl)methylene)indolin-2-one (6): 6-Bromo-1H-indole-2,3-dione (5) (2 g, 8.84 mmol), 5-[4-(diphenylamino)phenyl]thiophene-2-carbaldehyde (2) (6.29 g, 17.69 mmol), and PPh3 (4.64 g, 17.69 mmol) were combined and dissolved in 20 mL of toluene in a microwave reaction vessel containing a magnetic stir bar. The reaction vessel was irradiated in the Synthos 3000 microwave oven at 300 W for 4 h (up to 110 °C). After the removal of solvent, the crude product was purified by column chromatography (SiO2; CH2Cl2) to afford compound 6 (2.88, 60% yield). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.76 (s, 1H); 8.13 (s, 1H); 7.91 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H); 7.68 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H); 7.64 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 7.55 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H); 7.37 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 4H); 7.19 (d, J = 8.1, 1H); 7.16-7.09 (m, 6H); 7.03–7.00 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 167.5; 151.6; 148.2; 147.0; 141.9; 140.4; 136.2; 130.2; 129.7; 127.4; 127.3; 125.1; 124.3; 24.0; 123.8; 122.8; 121.4; 120.9; 120.0; 112.5. HRMS (FAB) (m/z [M + H]+) calcd for C31H22ON2BrS, 549.0631; found 549.0632.
Methyl (Z)-2-(6-bromo-3-((5-(4-(diphenylamino)phenyl)thiophen-2-yl)methylene)-2-oxoindolin-1-yl)acetate (7): Compound 7 was prepared from compound 6 using a method similar to that described for the synthesis of compound 4 to get 1.86 g (57%) final ester. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.23 (s, 1H); 7.90 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H); 7.69 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H); 7.67 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H); 7.56 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H); 7.39–7.32 (m, 5H); 7.27 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H); 7.14–7.07 (m, 6H); 6.98 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H); 4.71 (s, 2H); 3.69 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.1; 166.0; 153.2; 148.4; 147.1; 141.2; 139.5; 136.0; 129.5; 129.3; 127.2; 127.0; 124.9; 123.5; 123.1; 122.7; 122.6; 121.3; 119.6; 118.0; 111.2; 52.6; 41.0. HRMS (FAB) (m/z [M]+) calcd for C34H25BrN2O3S, 620.0769; found 620.0770.
Synthesis of sensitizer TI116: Dye TI116 was prepared from compound 7 using a method similar to that described for the synthesis of sensitizer TI111 to get 1.03 g (56%) 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.22 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H); 7.89 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 2H); 7.73 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H); 7.61 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H); 7.40–7.28 (m, 6H); 7.14–7.08 (m, 6H); 6.98 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 4.56 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.8; 168.5; 150.6; 148.5; 146.9; 144.5; 140.0; 135.3; 130.1; 129.3; 127.6; 126.4; 125.2; 124.9; 124.6; 124.4; 122.6; 122.4; 119.9; 119.8; 112.6; 41.8. HRMS (FAB) (m/z [M]+) calcd for C33H23BrN2O3S, 606.0607; found 606.0606.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have designed and synthesized new acceptors bearing halogen-substituted oxindoles for the application in DSSCs. Among all the halogen-substituted acceptors studied in this artical, the sensitizer with Br exhibited superior photo-physical properties. Also, the amide carbonyl groups of these acceptors can have partial chelation to the TiO2 surface providing an added benefit towards effective electron injection. The new oxindole building block can provided a new gateway for future rational dye design for applications in DSSC. Evidently, further enhancement in the absorption profiles of oxindole sensitizers can be obtained by using different electron withdrawing substituents and adding efficient donating moieties. Such structural modification of oxindole-based sensitizers to gain superior performances in DSSC is currently underway in our laboratory.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online. Figure S1: Theoretical calculation for the location of HOMOs and LUMOs, Table S1: Bond lengths [Å] and angles [°] for ester 4b, Table S2: Bond lengths [Å] and angles [°] for ester 7.

Author Contributions

Y.S.T. Conceptualization, performed the synthesis and wrote the manuscript.; C.S. validation, supervision and helped draft the manuscript.; M.-T.S. participated in the synthesis.; S.-H.T. and S.-Y.H. carried out device characterization.; W.-R.L. validation, project administration and helped draft the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We thank the Ministry of Science and Technology, ROC, for financial support (grants MOST 108-2113-M-027-002-MY, MOST 107-2113-M-027-004, and MOST 106-2113-M-008-007).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Grätzel, M. Mesoscopic solar cells for electricity and hydrogen production from sunlight. Chem. Lett. 2005, 34, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yun, S.; Lund, P.D.; Hinsch, A. Stability assessment of alternative platinum free counter electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 3495–3514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Wu, J.; Lan, Z.; Lin, J.; Huang, M.; Huang, Y.; Fan, L.; Luo, G. Electrolytes in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 2136–2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sugathan, V.; John, E.; Sudhakar, K.J.R.; Reviews, S.E. Recent improvements in dye sensitized solar cells: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 52, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Docampo, P.; Guldin, S.; Leijtens, T.; Noel, N.K.; Steiner, U.; Snaith, H.J. Lessons Learned: From Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells to All-Solid-State Hybrid Devices. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4013–4030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhang, S.; Yang, X.; Numata, Y.; Han, L. Highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells: Progress and future challenges. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 1443–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Grätzel, C.; Zakeeruddin, S.M. Recent trends in mesoscopic solar cells based on molecular and nanopigment light harvesters. Mater. Today 2013, 16, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Hardin, B.E.; Snaith, H.J.; McGehee, M.D. The renaissance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Nat. Photon. 2012, 6, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hagfeldt, A.; Boschloo, G.; Sun, L.; Kloo, L.; Pettersson, H. Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6595–6663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mishra, A.; Fischer, M.K.R.; Bäuerle, P. Metal-Free Organic Dyes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: From Structure: Property Relationships to Design Rules. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2474–2499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Robertson, N. Optimizing Dyes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2338–2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Grätzel, M. Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry II; McCleverty, J.A., Meyer, T.J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003; Volume 9, Chapter 16. [Google Scholar]
  13. Grätzel, M. Dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2003, 4, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Grätzel, M. Photoelectrochemical cells. Nature 2001, 414, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. O’Regan, B.; Grätzel, M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 1991, 353, 737–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Maddah, H.A.; Berry, V.; Behura, S.K. Biomolecular photosensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells: Recent developments and critical insights. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 121, 109678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Boschloo, G. Improving the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Front. Chem. 2019, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Sharma, K.; Sharma, V.; Sharma, S.S. Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: Fundamentals and Current Status. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yin, J.-F.; Velayudham, M.; Bhattacharya, D.; Lin, H.-C.; Lu, K.-L. Structure optimization of ruthenium photosensitizers for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells—A goal toward a “bright” future. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2012, 256, 3008–3035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Robson, K.C.D.; Bomben, P.G.; Berlinguette, C.P. Cycloruthenated sensitizers: Improving the dye-sensitized solar cell with classical inorganic chemistry principles. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 7814–7829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Kay, A.; Rodicio, I.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Müller, E.; Liska, P.; Vlachopoulos, N.; Grätzel, M. Conversion of light to electricity by cis-X2bis(2,2’-bipyridyl-4,4’-dicarboxylate)ruthenium(II) charge-transfer sensitizers (X = Cl-, Br-, I-, CN-, and SCN-) on nanocrystalline titanium dioxide electrodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 6382–6390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Péchy, P.; Renouard, T.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Comte, P.; Liska, P.; Cevey, L.; Costa, E.; Shklover, V.; et al. Engineering of Efficient Panchromatic Sensitizers for Nanocrystalline TiO2-Based Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1613–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Splivallo, R.; Liska, P.; Comte, P.; Grätzel, M. A swift dye uptake procedure for dye sensitized solar cells. Chem. Commun. 2003, 9, 1456–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Grätzel, M.J.J.o.P.; Chemistry, P.A. Conversion of sunlight to electric power by nanocrystalline dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2004, 164, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nazeeruddin, M.K.; De Angelis, F.; Fantacci, S.; Selloni, A.; Viscardi, G.; Liska, P.; Ito, S.; Takeru, B.; Grätzel, M. Combined Experimental and DFT-TDDFT Computational Study of Photoelectrochemical Cell Ruthenium Sensitizers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16835–16847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yasuo, C.; Ashraful, I.; Yuki, W.; Ryoichi, K.; Naoki, K.; Liyuan, H. Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells with Conversion Efficiency of 11.1%. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Part 1 2006, 45, L638. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang, S.-W.; Chou, C.-C.; Hu, F.-C.; Wu, K.-L.; Chi, Y.; Clifford, J.N.; Palomares, E.; Liu, S.-H.; Chou, P.-T.; Wei, T.-C.; et al. Panchromatic Ru(ii) sensitizers bearing single thiocyanate for high efficiency dye sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 17618–17627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jia, H.-L.; Li, S.-S.; Gong, B.-Q.; Gu, L.; Bao, Z.-L.; Guan, M.-Y. Efficient cosensitization of new organic dyes containing bipyridine anchors with porphyrins for dye-sensitized solar cells. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2020, 4, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Higashino, T.; Imahori, H. Porphyrins as excellent dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells: Recent developments and insights. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 448–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yella, A.; Mai, C.-L.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Chang, S.-N.; Hsieh, C.-H.; Yeh, C.-Y.; Grätzel, M. Molecular Engineering of Push–Pull Porphyrin Dyes for Highly Efficient Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: The Role of Benzene Spacers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 2973–2977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Urbani, M.; Grätzel, M.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Torres, T. Meso-Substituted Porphyrins for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 12330–12396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, L.-L.; Diau, E.W.-G. Porphyrin-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 291–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bessho, T.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Yeh, C.-Y.; Diau, E.W.-G.; Grätzel, M. Highly Efficient Mesoscopic Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Based on Donor–Acceptor-Substituted Porphyrins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6646–6649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Collavini, S.; Völker, S.F.; Delgado, J.L. Understanding the Outstanding Power Conversion Efficiency of Perovskite-Based Solar Cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 9757–9759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhao, Y.; Zhu, K. Organic-inorganic hybrid lead halide perovskites for optoelectronic and electronic applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 655–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Green, M.A.; Ho-Baillie, A.; Snaith, H.J. The emergence of perovskite solar cells. Nat. Photonics 2014, 8, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rong, Y.; Liu, L.; Mei, A.; Li, X.; Han, H. Beyond Efficiency: The Challenge of Stability in Mesoscopic Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1501066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yen, Y.-S.; Chou, H.-H.; Chen, Y.-C.; Hsu, C.-Y.; Lin, J.T. Recent developments in molecule-based organic materials for dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 8734–8747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yao, Z.; Zhang, M.; Wu, H.; Yang, L.; Li, R.; Wang, P. Donor/Acceptor Indenoperylene Dye for Highly Efficient Organic Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 3799–3802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wu, Y.; Zhu, W. Organic sensitizers from D-[small pi]-A to D-A-[small pi]-A: Effect of the internal electron-withdrawing units on molecular absorption, energy levels and photovoltaic performances. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 2039–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kanaparthi, R.K.; Kandhadi, J.; Giribabu, L. Metal-free organic dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells: Recent advances. Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 8383–8393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ooyama, Y.; Harima, Y. Molecular Designs and Syntheses of Organic Dyes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 18, 2903–2934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cong, J.; Yang, X.; Liu, J.; Zhao, J.; Hao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Sun, L. Nitro group as a new anchoring group for organic dyes in dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 6663–6665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Rice, C.R.; Ward, M.D.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Grätzel, M. Catechol as an efficient anchoring group for attachment of ruthenium-polypyridine photosensitisers to solar cells based on nanocrystalline TiO2 films. New J. Chem. 2000, 24, 651–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Jirousek, M.; Liska, P.; Vlachopoulos, N.; Shklover, V.; Fischer, C.-H.; Grätzel, M. Acid−Base Equilibria of (2,2‘-Bipyridyl-4,4‘-dicarboxylic acid)ruthenium(II) Complexes and the Effect of Protonation on Charge-Transfer Sensitization of Nanocrystalline Titania. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 6298–6305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Numata, Y.; Ashraful, I.; Shirai, Y.; Han, L. Preparation of donor-acceptor type organic dyes bearing various electron-withdrawing groups for dye-sensitized solar cell application. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 6159–6161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Delcamp, J.H.; Yella, A.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Grätzel, M. Modulating dye E(S+/S*) with efficient heterocyclic nitrogen containing acceptors for DSCs. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 2295–2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hong, J.; Lai, H.; Liu, Y.; Yuan, C.; Li, Y.; Liu, P.; Fang, Q. New organic dyes containing E- or Z-trifluoromethyl acrylic acid as the electron acceptors for dye-sensitized solar cell applications: An investigation of the effect of molecular configuration on the power conversion efficiency of the cells. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 1069–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, T.-Y.; Su, C.; Akula, S.B.; Sun, W.-G.; Chien, H.-M.; Li, W.-R. New Pyridinium Ylide Dyes for Dye Sensitized Solar Cell Applications. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 3386–3389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Silva, J.F.M.; Garden, S.J.; Pinto, A.C. The chemistry of isatins: A review from 1975 to 1999. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2001, 12, 273–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sun, L.; Tran, N.; Tang, F.; App, H.; Hirth, P.; McMahon, G.; Tang, C. Synthesis and Biological Evaluations of 3-Substituted Indolin-2-ones:  A Novel Class of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors That Exhibit Selectivity toward Particular Receptor Tyrosine Kinases. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 2588–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Marfat, A.; Robinson, R.P. Preparation of azaoxindole-1-carboxamides as antiinflammatories and analgesics. U.S. Patent 5,811,432 A, 22 September 1998. [Google Scholar]
  53. Robinson, R.R.; Donahue, K.M.; Son, P.S.; Wagy, S.D. Synthesis of substituted azaoxindoles for the preparation of aza-tenidap analogs. J. Heterocyclic Chem. 1996, 33, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tingare, Y.S.; Shen, M.-T.; Su, C.; Ho, S.-Y.; Tsai, S.-H.; Chen, B.-R.; Li, W.-R. Novel Oxindole Based Sensitizers: Synthesis and Application in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 4292–4295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Simon, S.J.C.; Parlane, F.G.L.; Swords, W.B.; Kellett, C.W.; Du, C.; Lam, B.; Dean, R.K.; Hu, K.; Meyer, G.J.; Berlinguette, C.P. Halogen Bonding Promotes Higher Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell Photovoltages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 10406–10409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Yoder, N.C.; Kumar, K. Fluorinated amino acids in protein design and engineering. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002, 31, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Babudri, F.; Farinola, G.M.; Naso, F.; Ragni, R. Fluorinated organic materials for electronic and optoelectronic applications: The role of the fluorine atom. Chem. Commun. 2007, 10, 1003–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Chen, B.-S.; Chen, D.-Y.; Chen, C.-L.; Hsu, C.-W.; Hsu, H.-C.; Wu, K.-L.; Liu, S.-H.; Chou, P.-T.; Chi, Y. Donor-acceptor dyes with fluorine substituted phenylene spacer for dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 1937–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bhim Raju, T.; Vaghasiya, J.V.; Afroz, M.A.; Soni, S.S.; Iyer, P.K. Design, synthesis and DSSC performance of o-fluorine substituted phenylene spacer sensitizers: Effect of TiO2 thickness variation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 28485–28491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jie, J.; Xu, Q.; Yang, G.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, B. Porphyrin sensitizers involving a fluorine-substituted benzothiadiazole as auxiliary acceptor and thiophene as π bridge for use in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Dyes Pigments 2020, 174, 107984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mao, J.; He, N.; Ning, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Guo, F.; Chen, L.; Wu, W.; Hua, J.; Tian, H. Stable Dyes Containing Double Acceptors without COOH as Anchors for Highly Efficient Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Angew. Chem. 2012, 124, 10011–10014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mann, J.R.; Gannon, M.K.; Fitzgibbons, T.C.; Detty, M.R.; Watson, D.F. Optimizing the Photocurrent Efficiency of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells through the Controlled Aggregation of Chalcogenoxanthylium Dyes on Nanocrystalline Titania Films. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 13057–13061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kuang, D.; Uchida, S.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Grätzel, M. Organic Dye-Sensitized Ionic Liquid Based Solar Cells: Remarkable Enhancement in Performance through Molecular Design of Indoline Sensitizers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1923–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Tian, H.; Yang, X.; Chen, R.; Pan, Y.; Li, L.; Hagfeldt, A.; Sun, L. Phenothiazine derivatives for efficient organic dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Commun. 2007, 36, 3741–3743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chen, R.; Yang, X.; Tian, H.; Sun, L. Tetrahydroquinoline dyes with different spacers for organic dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2007, 189, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hara, K.; Wang, Z.-S.; Sato, T.; Furube, A.; Katoh, R.; Sugihara, H.; Dan-oh, Y.; Kasada, C.; Shinpo, A.; Suga, S. Oligothiophene-Containing Coumarin Dyes for Efficient Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 15476–15482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Liu, W.-H.; Wu, I.C.; Lai, C.-H.; Lai, C.-H.; Chou, P.-T.; Li, Y.-T.; Chen, C.-L.; Hsu, Y.-Y.; Chi, Y. Simple organic molecules bearing a 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene linker for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Commun. 2008, 41, 5152–5154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds not available from the authors.
Molecules 25 02159 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Molecular structures of oxindole dyes (TI111−TI116). (b) ORTEP diagram of methyl ester of TI112. (c) ORTEP diagram of methyl ester of TI116.
Figure 1. (a) Molecular structures of oxindole dyes (TI111−TI116). (b) ORTEP diagram of methyl ester of TI112. (c) ORTEP diagram of methyl ester of TI116.
Molecules 25 02159 g001
Molecules 25 02159 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of TI111-TI115 sensitizers.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of TI111-TI115 sensitizers.
Molecules 25 02159 sch001
Molecules 25 02159 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Synthesis of TI116 sensitizer.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of TI116 sensitizer.
Molecules 25 02159 sch002
Molecules 25 02159 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Absorption spectra of TI111-TI116 in CH2Cl2. (b) Absorption spectra for transparent TiO2 films (thickness: 5 µm) coated with 8.0 × 10−5 M solutions of TI111–TI116.
Figure 2. (a) Absorption spectra of TI111-TI116 in CH2Cl2. (b) Absorption spectra for transparent TiO2 films (thickness: 5 µm) coated with 8.0 × 10−5 M solutions of TI111–TI116.
Molecules 25 02159 g002
Molecules 25 02159 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Frontier molecular orbital profiles of TI114 and TI116 at the B3LYP/6-31g (d,p) level. (b) FTIR spectra of the TI114 dye powder and dye adsorbed on film.
Figure 3. (a) Frontier molecular orbital profiles of TI114 and TI116 at the B3LYP/6-31g (d,p) level. (b) FTIR spectra of the TI114 dye powder and dye adsorbed on film.
Molecules 25 02159 g003
Molecules 25 02159 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Current versus potential plots and (b) Monochromatic IPCE spectra for sensitizers TI111–TI116. (c) EIS spectra measured under illumination of DSSCs based on TI111–TI116 dyes.
Figure 4. (a) Current versus potential plots and (b) Monochromatic IPCE spectra for sensitizers TI111–TI116. (c) EIS spectra measured under illumination of DSSCs based on TI111–TI116 dyes.
Molecules 25 02159 g004
Table
Table 1. Electrochemical properties for TI111–TI116 dyes.
Table 1. Electrochemical properties for TI111–TI116 dyes.
Dyeλabs/nm
(ε/L mol−1 cm−1)		EHOMO[a] (eV)ELUMO[b] (eV)E0-0[b] (eV)
TI111469 (3.7737)5.113.022.09
TI112480 (3.0562)5.113.052.06
TI114483 (3.8825)5.113.082.03
TI115483 (3.4712)5.123.092.03
TI116410 (1.7437)5.113.062.05
[a] EHOMO = Eox − EFc/Fc+ + 4.8 eV. [b] ELUMO = EHOMO – E0-0. The band gap, E0-0, was estimated from the onset of absorption spectrum measured in CH2Cl2.
Table
Table 2. Photovoltaic parameters of devices incorporating TI111-TI116 sensitizers.
Table 2. Photovoltaic parameters of devices incorporating TI111-TI116 sensitizers.
SensitizerJSC (mA cm−2)VOC (mV)FFη (%)
TI11110.036800.6694.76
TI11211.326900.6955.43
TI11412.467200.7086.35
TI11511.976800.7145.81
TI1169.666300.6924.21

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tingare, Y.S.; Su, C.; Shen, M.-T.; Tsai, S.-H.; Ho, S.-Y.; Li, W.-R. New Oxindole-Bridged Acceptors for Organic Sensitizers: Substitution and Performance Studies in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Molecules 2020, 25, 2159. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25092159

AMA Style

Tingare YS, Su C, Shen M-T, Tsai S-H, Ho S-Y, Li W-R. New Oxindole-Bridged Acceptors for Organic Sensitizers: Substitution and Performance Studies in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Molecules. 2020; 25(9):2159. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25092159

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tingare, Yogesh S., Chaochin Su, Ming-Tai Shen, Sheng-Han Tsai, Shih-Yu Ho, and Wen-Ren Li. 2020. "New Oxindole-Bridged Acceptors for Organic Sensitizers: Substitution and Performance Studies in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells" Molecules 25, no. 9: 2159. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25092159

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop