Next Article in Journal
A New Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of the Chiral Key Intermediate of the Antiepileptic Brivaracetam
Previous Article in Journal
A Simple Method for On-Gel Detection of Myrosinase Activity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 23
Issue 9
10.3390/molecules23092205
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Application of Dendrimers for the Treatment of Infectious Diseases

by
Zandile Mhlwatika
and
Blessing Atim Aderibigbe
*
Department of Chemistry, University of Fort Hare, Alice Campus, Eastern Cape 5700, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2018, 23(9), 2205; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23092205
Submission received: 14 May 2018 / Revised: 14 June 2018 / Accepted: 15 June 2018 / Published: 31 August 2018
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Dendrimers are drug delivery systems that are characterized by a three-dimensional, star-shaped, branched macromolecular network. They possess ideal properties such as low polydispersity index, biocompatibility and good water solubility. They are made up of the interior and the exterior layers. The exterior layer consists of functional groups that are useful for conjugation of drugs and targeting moieties. The interior layer exhibits improved drug encapsulation efficiency, reduced drug toxicity, and controlled release mechanisms. These unique properties make them useful for drug delivery. Dendrimers have attracted considerable attention as drug delivery system for the treatment of infectious diseases. The treatment of infectious diseases is hampered severely by drug resistance. Several properties of dendrimers such as their ability to overcome drug resistance, toxicity and control the release mechanism of the encapsulated drugs make them ideal systems for the treatment of infectious disease. The aim of this review is to discuss the potentials of dendrimers for the treatment of viral and parasitic infections.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Infectious diseases are caused by microorganisms such as bacteria, viruses, parasites or fungi [1]. The diseases can be transmitted by bites from insects or animals; or they can be spread directly or indirectly from one person to another or through contaminated food, plants, soil or water [2]. People with compromised immune systems and children are the most affected by the diseases [3,4]. Infectious diseases can be treated but their treatment is hindered by simultaneous resistance to multiple drugs [3,5]. Due to the development of drug resistance by infectious agents, several researchers have developed drug delivery systems for the treatment of infectious diseases.
Viruses are microorganisms living cells that replicate only within living cells by using the enzyme systems of the cells. Viral infections in human include herpes, influenza, HIV/AIDS etc. [6]. About 7.7% of deaths in South Africa were caused by influenza and pneumonia in 2011 [7]. A study conducted in South Africa also showed that about 44% of HIV patients were likely to have influenza co-infection [8]. AIDS still remains the top 10 leading causes of death in South Africa [9]. Although the number of infectious diseases is still high globally, the overall death rate is decreasing. This may be due to the improved service delivery, improved access to healthcare centre, good nutrition, and better education about infectious diseases [10]. However, in 2010, the number of death caused by infectious diseases had decreased [11]. The World Health Organization (WHO) reported that there is a possibility of a million deaths due to infectious diseases by 2050 indicating that there is a pressing need to develop therapeutics that can treat infectious diseases effectively [12].
Drug delivery systems are potential therapeutic carriers which offer several advantages when compared to the conventional drugs used for the treatment of infectious diseases. Some examples of delivery systems used for the treatment of infectious diseases are polymer-drug conjugates, micelles, nanogels, hydrogel, emulsion, dendrimers etc. The unique properties of dendrimers as drug delivery systems make them potential devices for the treatment of infectious diseases [13]. Some of the advantages are: reduced toxicity, increased specificity which results in the protection of the healthy cell, tissues and organs from the toxic side effects of the drug; improved bioavailability; extended half-life resulting in reduced kidney clearance and protection of the incorporated drugs from premature degradation by enzymatic reactions and other scavenging mechanisms. This review will report the biological efficacy of dendrimers in the treatment of infectious diseases.

2. Parasitic Infections

A parasite is an organism that lives within or on a host, and its survival is dependent on the host. Some parasitic diseases are easily treated, while some are not. Common parasitic diseases are malaria, leishmaniasis, schistosomiasis and toxoplasmosis [14,15].

2.1. Malaria

Malaria is a parasitic disease caused by the genus Plasmodium parasite carried by female Anopheles mosquitoes [16]. There are five types of Plasmodium parasite that infect humans, including: P. ovale, P. malariae, P. knowlesi, P. vivax and P. falciparum [17]. Plasmodium falciparum is the species that causes the most life-threatening form of malaria. The disease is transmitted to a person by a bite of an infected female Anopheles mosquito [18]. It can also be transmitted from one person to another through blood transfusion, an organ transplant, and sharing of needles or syringes [18,19]. It can also be transmitted from an infected mother to a child at birth. This disease is common in the tropical and subtropical regions across the world, which include sub-Saharan Africa, Asia and Latin America [19,20]. Malaria has a major negative impact on economic development, thus leading to poverty [21]. The symptoms usually begin about ten to fifteen days after a mosquito bite [21]. Typical, symptoms of malaria include: fever, headaches, and vomiting, but in severe cases it can cause seizures, anemia, abnormal pains and coma [22].

2.2. Leishmaniasis

Leishmaniasis is caused by the Leishmania parasite that usually lives in infected sand flies. It can be transmitted from a bite of a female infected sand fly [23]. This disease can also be transmitted from one person to another through blood transfusion or by sharing of needles [24]. Leishmaniasis is found in parts of tropic and subtropical regions which include: East Africa, South America and Asia [25]. There are several different forms of leishmaniasis but the most common in humans are: cutaneous and visceral [26]. The main symptom of cutaneous leishmaniasis is skin sores. Common symptoms for visceral leishmaniasis are weight loss, fever, enlarged spleen and enlarged liver [27].

2.3. Schistosomiasis

Schistosomiasis is the third most devastating parasitic disease in the world [28]. It is the cause of mortality and morbidity in developing countries such as Africa, South America and Asia [29]. In 2014, an estimated 61.6 million people were infected with schistosomiasis [30]. It is caused by a parasite called Schistosoma and the parasite is a fluke [31]. The parasite affects the intestines and bladder, but because it lives in the blood, thus it can also affect other systems. After infection, the person may develop a rash or itchy skin within 1–2 months with symptoms such as muscle aches, fatigue, cough, weight loss, fever and chills [32].

2.4. Toxoplasmosis

Toxoplasmosis is an infection caused by a parasite called Toxoplasma gondii [33]. The infection usually occurs from the exposure to infected cat faeces, by eating undercooked meat, or it can be transmitted from mother to child during pregnancy [33]. It can also be found in contaminated water [34]. People who are at a high risk of the infection are those with compromised immune systems and infants born to mothers with active infection during pregnancy [35]. Toxoplasmosis can cause serious complications to those with weakened immune systems such as infants, pregnant women and people living with HIV/AIDS [35]. Most healthy people who are infected with toxoplasmosis show no signs or symptoms but some may develop symptoms similar to flu, fever, body aches, headache and fatigue [36]. Toxoplasmosis is life-threatening in people with low immune systems and they are at risk of developing seizures, confusion, poor eye vision, and lung infection [36,37].

3. Viral Infection

Viruses are microorganisms that replicate only within living cells by using the cells’ enzyme systems [38]. They cause diseases such as HIV, herpes, cervical cancer (HPV), meningitis, hepatitis, and influenza etc. [39].

3.1. HIV

HIV is a human immune virus that causes acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) over time [40]. HIV attacks immune system of the body, causing low CD4 count. AIDS is the final stage of HIV infection, but not everyone with HIV develop AIDS [41]. When HIV has manifested into AIDS, it becomes life-threatening by destroying the white blood cells that usually fight infections [42]. This can cause serious infections and diseases like tuberculosis, candidiasis and meningitis etc. [43]. HIV is transmitted through sexual intercourse with an infected person, through blood transfusion from an infected person, and from an infected mother to her baby through breastfeeding, during pregnancy [44]. The symptoms of HIV usually develop several months or even years after infection with the virus [45]. The early symptoms of HIV infection include: fever, chill, joint pain, and rashes. If HIV has manifested into AIDS, then the symptoms may include diarrhea, dry cough, weight loss, night sweats and serious fever [45,46].

3.2. Influenza

Influenza is a contagious respiratory infection which affects people of all ages [47]. The virus is transmitted through the air by coughs and sneezes and infects the nose, throat, mouth, and lungs. It can also be transferred by touching surfaces that are already contaminated with the virus [48]. The virus can be deadly in individuals with low immune system (i.e., newborn babies, elderly people and people living with chronic diseases) [49]. There are three common forms of influenza, namely: type A, B and C [50]. Type A flu viruses are the most dangerous and exhibit deadly complications and are responsible for the large human influenza pandemics [51]. The virus mostly affects humans but animals and wild birds are also known hosts for the flu virus [51]. Type B virus is less common than A and it only affects humans [52]. Although type B is very harmful, but it is less severe than type A [53]. Type B influenza does not cause human pandemics [54]. Influenza type C causes mild diseases and is less common than other types, there are no epidemics associated with influenza type C [55]. Symptoms include cough, chills, headaches, sore throat and body muscle aches [56].

3.3. Meningitis

Meningitis is a viral infection of the meninges, the tough layer of tissue surrounding the spinal cord and the brain [57]. Meningitis can lead to brain swelling causing permanent disabilities such as coma, and can lead to death if not treated [58]. There are four common type of meningitis which include bacterial, viral, fungal and aseptic meningitis [59]. Bacterial meningitis is the most life-threatening and can lead to death in few hours [59]. It is caused by the bacterial such as Streptococcus, Streptococcus pneumonia, Neisseria meningitides and Listeria monocytogenes [60]. Most people are lucky to recover from it, but they are likely to get permanent disabilities such as hearing loss, brain damage and coma [60]. Viral meningitis is caused by viruses such as enteroviruses, herpes varicella and mumps viruses [61]. Fungal meningitis is caused by pathogens such as Candida spp.-Histoplasma capsulatum and Cryptococcus neoformans. Fungal meningitis is most common in people with low immune systems, and it is more severe in people with impaired immune systems (e.g., organ transplantation) [62]. Parasitic meningitis is caused by parasites such as Angiostrongylus cantonensis, Schistosoma, Toxocariasis and Gnathostoma spinigerum. The infection is believed to occur when there is a predominance of eosinophilia in the CSF [63]. Symptoms of meningitis include fever, stiffness of neck, nausea, headache and vomiting [64].

3.4. Herpes

Herpes is a sexually transmitted disease [65]. Oral herpes is also known as HSV-1, or type 1 herpes simplex [66]. It can be transmitted via infected saliva, mucous membranes or skin [67]. This virus causes sores in the mouth, gums, tongue, face or nose. It causes symptoms such as fever, swollen lymph nodes and muscle aches [68]. Genital herpes is also known as HSV-2, or type 2 herpes simplex [69]. This virus causes sores around the genital areas. The virus is transmitted through skin-to-skin contact with sores [69]. Genital herpes is most likely to affect women than men and women with HIV are difficult to treat resulting in the administration of higher doses of antiviral drugs [70]. The virus sometimes hides in the nerves causing no symptoms. If the symptoms are visible, then a person may experience itchy painful blisters which could results in ulcers [71].

3.5. Hepatitis

Hepatitis is the inflammation of the liver tissue resulting from alcohol abuse, certain medications and toxins [72]. Common types of hepatitis are Hepatitis A, B and C. Hepatitis A is a virus that causes liver infection [72]. It is transmitted through the digestion of food or water that is already contaminated with the faeces of an infected person [73]. Symptoms of hepatitis A include vomiting, tiredness, joint pains, dark urine and intense itching [74]. Hepatitis B is caused by the virus hepatitis B and it is transmitted from blood and body fluids of an infected person. It is also transmitted from mother-to-unborn baby if the mother is infected [75]. Hepatitis B can be prevented by vaccination. Symptoms are similar to those of type A; they include headache, dark urine, and vomiting etc. [76]. Hepatitis C causes serious liver cancer, which could lead to liver transplant [77]. Approximately 80% of patients with hepatitis C develop chronic liver infection [78]. It is transmitted via sharing needles with an infected person, through ingesting drugs and through mother to child transmission during pregnancy. Symptoms include fever, fatigue, nausea, abdominal pain and jaundice [79].

3.6. Cervical Cancer

Cervical cancer is caused by a virus called human papillomavirus (HPV) and this virus causes the growth of abnormal cells on the cervix which is cancerous [80]. HPV is transmitted via sexual intercourse [81]. There are factors that contribute to the development of HPV, such as having many sexual partners, people living with HIV I are likely to be infected with the disease, long-term use of contraceptives, having several pregnancies and giving birth at a young age [82]. Symptoms of cervical cancer include abnormal vaginal bleeding, abnormal vaginal discharge, and vaginal bleeding after menopause, heavy periods and vaginal bleeding after sex [83].

4. Application of Dendrimers in the Treatment of Infectious Diseases

Infectious diseases are caused by microorganisms, such as bacteria, viruses, parasites or fungi [84]. Infectious diseases are currently being treated by therapeutics such as antibiotics, antiviral, anti-parasitic and antifungal [85]. Most of these therapeutics suffer from severe limitations such as drug resistance, toxicity and their routes of administration result in poor patient compliance [86,87]. The drug-resistant problem is due to different mechanism such as increased efflux system; reduced membrane permeability or increase of drug degradation [88]. Due to these limitations, the application of targeted drug delivery system is an attractive carrier for the treatment of infectious diseases [89]. Drug delivery system is used to transport pharmaceutical compounds directly to the targeted organs or tissue with less toxic effects on the organs/tissue [90]. There are many different types of drug delivery systems, such as dendrimers, micelles, liposomes, nanospheres, nanocapsules, hydrogels and polymer-drug conjugates [91]. An ideal drug delivery system must be able to reduce drug toxicity, improve bioavailability, biocompatibility, enhance drug solubility, non-immunogenic, biodegradable, enhance patients’ compliance and be able to overcome drug resistance [92,93].
Dendrimers are synthetic polymers with three-dimensional, star-shaped and branched macromolecules [94]. They are made up of the interior layers and the exterior layers. The exterior layer is composed of functional groups which are useful for conjugation of drugs and targeting moieties [95]. The interior layers are suitable for encapsulation of drug molecules with improved drug efficacy, reducing drug toxicity and control release mechanisms of drugs [96]. They are water-soluble, biocompatible, polyvalence, and biodegradable [96]. These properties make them useful for drug delivery and they are being investigated by several scientists [97]. Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of dendrimers from generation one to four. This review will demonstrate the importance of dendrimers as a targeted delivery system for the treatment of infectious diseases precisely viral and parasitic infections.

4.1. Various Dendrimers and Their Applications

Dendrimers have several medical and practical applications; they can be used for drug delivery, gene delivery, tissue engineering and for diagnosis [98]. Several dendrimers have been developed for biomedical applications [98]. Polyamidoamine (PAMAM) has been used extensively for drug delivery (Figure 2a) and tissue engineering (Figure 2b), because of their biocompatibility, hydrophilic nature and non-immunogenic effect [99]. PAMAM dendrimers consist of ethylenediamine core, their branching units consist of amine groups that can be used to load drugs, antibodies, enzymes and other bioactive agents [100,101]. Poly-l-lysine (PLL, Figure 2c) dendrimers are mostly used as gene carriers; they contain two primary amines which are often modified to enhance their therapeutic effects [102]. Poly-l-Lysine dendrimers are biocompatible, flexible, biodegradable and water-soluble [102]. Poly (propylene imine) (PPI, Figure 2d) dendrimers are used for diagnosis [103]. The core of PPI is usually based on a 1,4-diaminobutane or ethylenediamine and the branching units consists of propylene imine monomers [103].

4.2. Dendrimers for the Treatment of Leishmaniasis

Leishmaniasis is a life-threatening disease that is caused by a Leishmania parasite and transmitted through a bite of an infected sand-fly [104]. About 12 million cases of people are affected by leishmaniasis across the world and two million cases of leishmaniasis occur annually [105]. For several decades, leishmaniasis was being treated with drugs such as sodium stibogluconate (Pentostam, Figure 3b) and meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime) [106]. Although, these drugs have been used for several decades, they have been reported to develop resistance to leishmaniasis with side effects such as cardiotoxicity and pancreatitis [107]. A study in India revealed that about 65% of patients relapsed after treatment with an antimonial [108]. There is an increase in the cases of resistance to pentavalent antimonial reported worldwide [108,109]. Due to emergence of resistance of the parasite to antimonial drugs, amphotericin B (AmB, Figure 3c), Miltefosine (Figure 3a), and paromomycin (Figure 3d) are being used as alternative therapeutics for the treatment of leishmaniasis [110]. However, there are severe side effects associated with their use and they are also expensive [111]. Amphotericin B is used as both antifungal and antiparasite, although it shows a good efficacy, but it is expensive and requires oral dose [112]. Miltefosine is an anticancer drug but it has been approved as an oral drug for leishmaniasis [113]. Miltefosine also shows good efficacy, but it is very expensive with limitations such as low blood platelets, nephrotoxicity, diarrhea etc. [113]. Recently, the use of nanocarriers such as dendrimers have shown promising results in the treatment of leishmaniasis [114]. Dendrimers have the ability to transport drugs to the targeted site, reduce drug toxicity, increase drug solubilisation, protect the drug from degradation and ultimately kill the protozoa [115]. Jain et al. developed a formulation of muramyl dipeptide conjugated with poly (propyleneimine) (PPI) dendrimers encapsulated with amphotericin B (Figure 4). The synergistic antiparasitic activity of the formulation was evaluated in vivo. The in vivo results showed that the formulation was active against the parasite infection of macrophage cell lines and balb/c mice. The toxicity of the formulated drug loaded dendrimers was compared to the marketed formulation of amphotericin B. The prepared formulation exhibited a reduction of (p < 0.01) in toxicity towards human erythrocytes cells and J774A.1 macrophage cells [116], revealing the potential of the dendrimers to reduce the toxicity associated with amphotericin B (Table 1). The macrophage targeting ability of the formulation was enhanced, resulting in the killing of the parasites. These results suggested that the formulations are potential immunomodulatory with antileishmanial activity for targeted drug delivery of amphotericin B. Daftarian et al. developed a complex between liposome amphotericin B and Pan-DR-binding epitope-based dendrimers to study the therapeutic efficacy of low dose LAmB/PDD against full dose of LAmB via L. major mouse method [117]. The formulation exhibited reduced toxicity which was visible by dose reduction. In vitro toxicity of the formulation revealed reduced toxicity on Hep2 cells. The formulation was also delivered selectively to parasite reservoir cells, phagocytes [117]. The in vitro and in vivo studies revealed an 83% improvement in drug efficacy with a significant reduction of parasite burden and toxicity. Jain et al. prepared a poly (propylene imine) dendrimers containing mannose loaded with amphotericin B (Table 1). The formulation exhibited good drug incorporation efficiency and the in vitro results revealed pH-dependent drug release mechanism. The formulation also exhibited reduced toxicity on human erythrocytes and macrophage cells and the efficacy of the loaded drug was not compromised [118]. These dendrimers were observed to have significant antiparasitic activity towards L. denovani amastigotes with a promising antileishmanial activity [118]. Furthermore, pharmacokinetic and organ distribution studies revealed the controlled delivery mechanism of the formulation which was characterized by an enhanced drug uptake in macrophage-rich organs.

4.3. Toxoplasmosis

About two billion people are infected by Toxoplasma gondii. This parasite causes morbidity and mortality [123]. Pyrimethamine (Figure 5a) and sulfadoxine (Figure 5b) are currently being used for the treatment of toxoplasmosis (Table 1). However, there are some limitations in their use, such as toxicity and hypersensitivity [119]. The main problem with the drugs is that they do not eliminate the parasite because Toxoplasma gondii encysted bradyzoites [124]. There is a pressing need to develop a new strategy that can effectively treat toxoplasma gondii infection by crossing the host cell membrane, the parasitophorous vacuole, and the tachyzoite membranes [124]. Transductive peptide dendrimers are potential therapeutics because they can transport small bioactive molecules across multiple membranes through intracellular tachyzoites and encysted bradyzoites and they can also enhance the toxicity of the drugs [125]. There are few studies that have revealed the importance of dendrimers in the treatment of Toxoplasma gondii [126].
Lai et al. evaluated the potential of the treatment of Toxoplasma gondii infection by conjugating phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomers (PPMO) with transductive peptide [127]. The formulation reduced transfected T. gondii’s fluorescence, luminescence and limited tachyzoite replication. In vivo studies on infected mice revealed the reduction in the number of viable parasites after administration [127]. Figure 6 is a schematic presentation of PPMO with transductive peptide dendrimers.
Prieto et al. prepared poly (aminoamine)-based anionic and cationic dendrimers containing a reduced dose of sulfadoxine (0.03–33 mM). The MTT results on Vero and J774 cells showed no toxicity for cationic-sulfadoxine complex incubated between 0.03 and 33 mM of dendrimers concentration. However, the anionic-sulfadoxine complex resulted in enhanced cytotoxic effects when incubated at higher than 33 mM of dendrimers concentration. Both dendrimers were further tested in vitro using Vero infected cells with RH strain of Toxoplasma gondii for a period of 4 h in treatment. Cationic dendrimers produced the highest infection decrease of 60% at 0.03 mM and anionic dendrimers produced between 25% and 40% reduced infections. These results suggest that a nano dose of sulfadoxine- cationic complex can be used as a potential anti-toxoplasmic therapy [128]. The dendrimer exhibited high antiparasitic effect even when administered at very low doses over a period of 4 h of treatment. This revealed that the dendrimers have an antiparasitic effect. The dendrimers antiparasitic effects are attributed to a combination of surfacial activity and endosomolytic effect.

4.4. Schistosomiasis

Schistosomiasis is still a major problem in the world; about 200 million people are infected with schistosomiasis across the globe. The most infected countries are Africa, Asia and South America [129]. The disease is caused by numerous species of trematodes from the genus Schistosoma [130]. Schistosoma is treated with praziquantel and is an effective bioactive agent (Figure 7) [131]. Despite its availability and cost-effectiveness, it does not prevent relapse [131]. The emergence of resistance of praziquantel to schistosomes is spreading and causing a major concern and there is a need to develop a new vaccine to treat Schistosoma [132]. Dendrimers have been investigated by several researchers and they are promising therapeutics to eliminate the disease. Sikwal et al. investigated amphiphilic dendrimers potential applications for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications [133].
Wang et al. designed PAMAM dendrimers for the delivery of schistosomiasis japonica DNA vaccine and investigated its ability to enhance a protective effect against Schistosoma japonicum infection. The dendrimers were prepared by a Lysine-Modified method to form PAMAM-Lys. The dendrimers cytotoxic effects on 293T cell lines were evaluated by MTT assay, while Poly-lysine (PLL) was used as a control. It was observed that increasing PLL concentration decreased cell viability. Overall, the dendrimers exhibited 80–90% cell viability, showing no genitive effect on it cytotoxicity. When PAMAM-lys was combined with DNA vaccine (Table 1), it exhibited a higher level of efficacy when compared to the free DNA with reduced worm infection by 45–50% and 59–62% liver eggs reduction. These results showed that DNA vaccine with the novel PAMAM-lys dendrimers can enhance immunoreactivity of DNA vaccine, and can be used for the prevention of S. japonicum infection [120]. The formulation enhanced IgG2a antibody response with an increase in the production of IL-2 and IFN-γ.

4.5. Malaria

Malaria is life-threatening and half of the world’s population is at risk of malaria transmission [134]. People that are at a higher risk of being infected by malaria are children under the age of 5 years, pregnant women, people living with HIV/AIDS and low-immunitive travellers from malaria-endemic regions [135]. In 2015, 214 million cases were reported worldwide, with most deaths reported in sub-Saharan Africa, South-East Asia and the Eastern Mediterranean [136,137]. Malaria is treated using antimalarials such as chloroquine (Figure 8a), primaquine (Figure 8b), artemisinin (Figure 8c) and its derivatives. However, they suffer from severe drug resistance and toxicity which results in treatment failure [137]. Due to the emergence spread of drug resistance, drug toxicity and poor patient compliance, there is a need to develop drug delivery systems that can overcome drug resistance, reduce toxicity and improve patient compliance [138]. Dendrimers are promising delivery systems that have been used by many researchers due to its excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability [139]. Movellan et al. synthesized dendritic derivatives based on 2, 2-bis (hydroxymethyl) propionic acid (bis-MPA) and Pluronic polymers containing chloroquine and primaquine (Table 1). They were investigated for their targeting ability in Plasmodium—infected red blood cells (pRBCs) and their antimalarial activity against the human pathogen Plasmodium falciparum and in vivo against the rodent malaria species Plasmodium yoelii. From the in vitro results, the dendrimers exhibited antimalarial activity with reduced IC50 of chloroquine and primaquine by 3- and 4-fold down to 4.0 nm and 1.1 μm, respectively. The dendrimers were also found to exhibit specific targeting mechanism to the pRBCs when compared to non-infected RBCs. Amphiphilic bis-MPA derivatives- based dendrimers have been used in the application of biomedical field (Figure 9). Bis-MPA derivatives have shown a great therapeutic efficacy in drug delivery because of their ability to be degraded by enzymes, their compatibility, and high solubility in biological environments. They also consist of functional groups that make it easy to encapsulate antimalarial drugs. Figure 7 shows a typical example of amphiphilic dendrimers [121].
Agrawal et al. synthesized coated and uncoated poly-l-lysine dendrimers having polyethylene glycol (PEG-100) as a core for the delivery of chloroquine phosphate (Table 1). The in vivo results revealed that the dendrimers exhibited controlled drug release mechanism. The coated drug dendrimers exhibited reduced haemolytic toxicity when compared to the free drug [122]. The uncoated and coated dendrimers were synthesized by the protection and deprotection steps of l-lysine by di-BOC (di-tertiary butyl pyrocarbonate). The ex vivo results of both the uncoated and coated dendrimers revealed that the formulations were 5 times effective in reduction of phagocytosis for the coated dendrimers. The dendrimers were also found to exhibit controlled drug release mechanism. These findings suggested that the coated dendrimers were less immunogenic than the uncoated formulations.

5. Application of Dendrimers for the Treatment of Viral Infections

5.1. HIV

According to the latest data in 2012, the number of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections has decreased by 35%. However, 2.3 million people are infected with HIV with high death rates occurring worldwide [140,141,142]. 60% of people with HIV contracted the virus during sexual intercourse [143]. Therefore, AIDs are still a serious problem across the globe and there is a need to develop a new strategy to eliminate this virus [143]. The use of antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) is effective against HIV infection by delaying the disease progression as well as mortality rate in HIV-infected patients [144]. Although these antiretroviral are effective, they do not cure or eliminate the virus; therefore, there is a need for a new strategy [145]. Currently, nanotechnology provides novel nanoparticles such as dendrimers that can transport antiretroviral to the desired organs. Dendrimers have an exterior layer that is dominated by functional groups useful for the conjugation of drugs and targeting moieties [146]. The interior layers are suitable for the encapsulation of drug molecules with improved drug efficacy, reduced drug toxicity and controlled release mechanisms. Combination therapy is one promising method to fight this disease [147]. Cardoba et al. developed a polyanionic carbosilane dendrimers 9G3-S16 and G2-NF16) containing zidovudine (Figure 10a), efavirenz (Figure 10b) and tenofovir (Figure 10c) as anti-HIV-1 microbicides (Table 2). These dendrimers were tested against X4 and R5 HIV-1 strains in vitro. The prepared dendrimers showed a synergistic activity profile against both strains, and in human cells. The sulphated and naphthylsulfonated carbosilane dendrimers were able to inhibit viral infection by blocking the interaction between gp120 and CD4. This means that carbosilane dendrimers can block HIV infection at different stages of the HIV-1 life cycle before viral integration. The dendrimers act by electrostatic interactions with the viral envelope proteins resulting in the blockage of gp120/CD4 interaction and avoiding viral entry [148].
Zidovudine has been reported to be a very effective antiretroviral drug in the treatment of HIV virus. However, it has been reported to suffer from pharmacological limitations such as poor bioavailability, short half-life, and resistance. In order to overcome these limitations, Jain et al. developed a sustained release formulation of poly (propyl ether imine) dendrimers for the delivery of zidovudine (Table 2). Results from FTIR and NMR shows that zidovudine was successfully encapsulated onto dendrimers. Cumulative drug release of zidovudine from the dendrimers was 6.5 ± 0.3% when compared to the 95.8 ± 4.1% release from the control drug solution, hence revealing the sustained release profile of the dendrimers. The dendrimers also showed a reduction in the haemolytic toxicity due to the stable drug encapsulation in the dendrimers when compared to pure zidovudine drug solution. These findings suggest that the dendrimers are potential carriers for sustained delivery of zidovudine [160].
Crespo et al. formulated carbosilane dendrimers conjugated with tenofovir and maraviroc for the treatment of HIV-1 infection (Table 2). They were evaluated for anti-HIV-1 activity, cytotoxicity and vaginal irritation effects. The combination of maraviroc and tenofovir into the dendrimers exhibited a greater anti-HIV-1 activity than a single drug. These dendrimers were found to exhibit a greater synergistic activity profile due to the weighted average combination indices varied between 0.06 and 0.38 [153]. No vaginal irritation was detected in the female BALB/c mice. These results suggest that combination of two or three drugs into dendrimers can increase the antiviral activity. Telwatte et al. developed dendrimers SPL7013 as topical microbicides for the prevention of the transmission of human immunodeficiency virus [164]. It was prepared in a mucoadhesive carbopol gel. The formulation exhibited HIV-1 virucidal activity against X4 and R5X4. The mode of action of the formulation on X4 strain virus was via irreversible binding to HIV-1 envelope proteins. The inhibition of R5 strains was via reversible binding to HIV-1 envelope proteins, host cell CD4 and chemokine receptors [164]. Chonco et al. also prepared dendrimer-based microbicides which were water-soluble against HIV infection (Table 2). The formulation blocked activated primary peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) infection with HIV-1 and HIV-2 strains, inhibited partially HIV crossing through trans-epithelial monolayer in vitro. The mechanism of inhibition of the formulation against HIV-1 and HIV-2 is attributed to direct viral inactivation by blocking the CD4 receptor at the surface of the target cells. The interaction of the anionic charges of the formulation to HIV gp120 was higher in HIV-1 strains than in the HIV-2 strains due to variation in amino acids in the gp120 region [158]. Han et al. prepared polylysine-dendritic sulfated cellobiose via condensation of polylysine dendrimer generation 3 with acetylated cellobiose followed by deacetylation and sulfation. The sulfated cellobiose dendrimer exhibited anti-high HIV activity as dideoxycytidine, an anti-HIV drug and this is attributed to their cluster effects which improves their interaction with proteins on the surface of the viruses [165]. Borges et al. covalently attached globotriose and 3′-sialyllactose carbohydrate head groups found on two glycosphingolipids to a dendrimer core. The formulation inhibited HIV-1 infection of T cell lines and primary peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) by T cell line-adapted viruses or primary isolates, with IC50 0.1–7.4 μg/mL [166]. Doménech et al. revealed that gallic acid-triethylene glycol dendrimers can bind to the C-terminal domain of capsid protein. The dendrimers with large hydrophobic moiety at the dendritic branching inhibited the assembly of the human immunodeficiency virus capsid in vitro revealing the potential of dendrimers as anti-HIV drugs for targeting capsid assembly [167]. Price et al. studied the retention of HIV-1 and HSV-2 inhibitory levels of SPL7013 gel in female genital tract over a period of 24 h. 9 and 2.5 mg of SPL7013 administered resulted in high level of inhibition of HIV-1 and HSV-2, respectively [168]. HIV-1 and HSV-2 inhibition was maintained in 6/11 women. The formulation did not induce vaginal, vulvar or cervical irritation [168]. Carbosilane are great candidate for the delivery of HIV-peptides. They form stable compounds with nucleic acids and protect them from binding to proteins. These dendrimers were reported in the study by Lonov et al. The formulation was prepared in molar ratio (2.5–3):1 of dendrimer: peptide with size range of 180–275 nm and positive surface charge. The dendrimers were terminated with amino groups representing cationic particles that are suitable for binding the negatively charged HIV derived peptides and for the delivery of HIV peptides to dendritic cells. Figure 11 shows a second generation of carbosilane dendrimers [169]. De Las et al. prepared water-stable carbosilane dendrimers as non-viral vectors for transfecting nucleic acids against HIV. These systems formed nanoconjugates with nucleic acids revealing good interaction between the dendrimers and the nucleic acid. The degree of transfection using these nanoconjugates ranged between 70–90% depending on the generation [170]. Jiménez et al. developed dendrimers as a delivery vector for anti-HIV drugs that is capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier (BBB). A time-controlled degradation of the dendrimers resulting in the release of the encapsulated siRNA cargo was observed between 12–24 h in vitro (Table 2). The formulation transfected human astrocytes after crossing an in vitro BBB model. The transfected siRNA reduced replication of HIV-1 strains X4-HIV NL4-3 and R5-HIV BaL in human astrocyte [159]. Zhou et al. also reported the efficacy of cationic dendrimers as interfering RNA (siRNA) delivery system in humanized mouse model for HIV-1 infection [163] (Table 2). The formulation suppressed HIV-1 infection and provided protection against viral induced CD4(+) T-cell depletion. Follow-up administration of the formulation further resulted in complete inhibition of HIV-1 titers. The formulation accumulate in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells and liver without signs of toxicity indicating that the dendrimers are promising therapeutics for systemic delivery of combinations of siRNAs and the treatment of HIV-1 infection [163]. Briz et al. reported phosphorus-containing dendrimer for the delivery of ODNs and siRNAs. G4 (NH+ Et2 Cl−) 96 formed stable complexes with oligodeoxynucleotides or siRNAs with low cytotoxicity in Sup T1 cells or PBMC. The formulation reduced viral replication significantly indicating that the dendrimers can deliver and transfect siRNA into CD4-T cells as a potential alternative therapy in the HIV-1 infection [171]. Dendrimers are characterized by peripheral active groups and can interact with gp120 or CD4 molecule thereby hindering the attachment of HIV to the host cell. The presence of functional groups also has a huge effect on its antiviral activity. The enhanced cellular uptake of dendrimers also influences its biological activity.

5.2. Herpes

Herpes Simplex Viruses (Type 1 and Type 2) are the most common sexually transmitted infections (STIs) worldwide and they are responsible for a wide variety of clinical infections, including encephalitis, neonatal infections, and or visceral diseases [172]. About 500 million people are currently affected with HSV-2 worldwide and about 20 million new cases occur each year across the world [173]. In South Africa, about 31% of women between the ages 15–26 are infected with HSV-2, and 84% are women who are commercial sex workers in KwaZulu-Natal province [173]. The antivirals that are currently being used have developed resistance, hence there is an increasing need to improve antiviral drugs efficacy [174]. Antiviral drug loaded onto dendrimers have been found to inhibit infections by blocking attachment of the virus to its target cell or tissue [175]. The presence of functional groups on the dendrimers that are able to interact with cell surfaces also result in the killing of the virus [175]. Peptide-derivative dendrimers consist of multiple covalently functional peptides. Peptide dendrimers are synthetic and well-defined macromolecules because they directly inhibit viral infections. They are more effective when combined with other antiviral agents (Figure 12). Lunganini et al. designed peptide-dendrimers and its derivatives (SB105 and SB105-A10) for the inhibition of herpes type 1 and 2. The dendrimers and derivatives were tested for antiviral activity against Vero cells infected with HSV. Both dendrimers derivatives exhibited inhibition HSV adsorption at pH 3.0 and 4.0 and in the presence of 10% human serum proteins, they were also found to prevent type 1 and type 2 herpes virus attachment to the targeted cells. When combined with acyclovir (Figure 13) a high synergistic effect was significant in vitro [150] (Table 2).
Carberry et al. prepared poly (amide)-based dendrimers for viral inhibition. The dendrimers were functionalized with the membrane-peptide gH (625–644) (gH625) derived from the herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and encapsulated with glycoprotein H, which is known to be able to deliver cargos into the cellular membrane. The peptide dendrimers showed no sign of cell toxicity with 50% inhibition concentration of 100 nM for HSV-1 and 300 nM for HSV-2 [176]. These results were also similar to the study by Tarallo et al., confirming that peptide- functionalized with gH (625–644) (gH625) dendrimers are promising candidates for intracellular targeted delivery of drugs and the prevention of HSV infection [177]. Ceña-Diez et al. developed polyanionic carbosilane dendrimers with anti-HIV-1 activity as microbicide candidates against sexually transmitted diseases. Plaque reduction assay on Vero cells proved the dendrimers exhibited inhibitory effect against HSV-2 infection. Some of the dendrimers acted by binding directly onto the HSV-2 thereby inactivating while some adhered to host cell-surface proteins. The dendrimers exhibited good synergistic effect with acyclovir and tenofovir against HSV-2, in vitro. Topical vaginal or rectal administration of the formulation prevented HSV-2 transmission in BALB/c mice in values close to 100% [157]. In another research report by Ceña-Diez et al. studied the mechanism of action of peptide derivatized-dendrimers, carbosilane dendrimers, polysulfated galactose functionalized glycodendrimers and PAMAM dendrimers used as microbicides against sexually transmitted diseases (Table 2). These dendrimers were found to act at the stage of viral entry into the target cell by blocking the viral particles that bind to the cell surface heparan sulfate or binding to cellular co-receptors [154]. Tarallo et al. synthesized poly(amide)-based dendrimers functionalized at the termini with a membrane-interacting peptide obtained from herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 1 glycoprotein H, gH625–644 (Table 2). This peptide has been shown to interact with model membranes and to inhibit viral infectivity. The 50% inhibitory concentration of the formulation was 100 and 300 nM against HSV-1 and HSV-2, respectively. These results indicated that functionalization of the dendrimers with the peptide sequence derived from an HSV glycoproteins are promising therapeutics for the treatment of HSV infection [162].

5.3. Hepatitis

Hepatitis is the major cause of chronic liver disease [178]. About 200 million individuals in the world are estimated to suffer from Hepatitis C infection [179]. There is no effective vaccine against hepatitis C and the emergence of transmission of this virus is escalating especially when prophylactic measures are not taken [179]. The antivirals that are currently used such as sofosbuvir (Figure 14a), ribavirin (Figure 14b) have developed resistance to hepatitis C infection, hence there is an urgent need to develop new antiviral agents that will be able to deliver the drugs to its site of action, minimize the side effects, and enhance therapeutic efficacy [180]. Dendrimers are the best candidate for the delivery of antiviral agents. They are biodegradable, biocompatible and can be used as drug carriers [181]. Crespo et al., synthesize polyanionic carbosilane dendrimers for the prevention of hepatitis C virus infection (Table 2). The preliminary studies showed that one of the dendrimers encapsulated with sofosbuvir was able to inhibit the virus infection [156]. Khosravy et al. conjugated hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) to dendrimers resulting in the induced high levels of total IgG in vivo [182]. Immunological assays indicated that the immunogenicity of the conjugated HBsAg was enhanced when compared to HBsAg alone [182]. Lakshminarayanan reported liver-targeted dendritic nano-vector functionalized with a galactopyranoside ligand for the delivery of siRNA [161] (Table 2). Targeted delivery of siRNA to the liver was achieved via a highly specific ligand—receptor interaction between dendritic galactose and the asialoglycoprotein receptor. A decrease in HCV RNA levels of 75% was achieved in HCV-JFH1 infectious cell culture systems. The targeted release mechanism of the formulation revealed it is a potential therapeutic for the treatment of infections in the liver such as hepatitis [161].

5.4. Influenza

Influenza is typically treated with antiviral drugs such as oseltamivir (Figure 15a), amantadine (Figure 15b) and rimantadine (Figure 15c) [183,184]. However, oseltamivir has developed some resistance against influenza [185]. The reason of resistance of oseltamivir is that it can lose its ability to bind and inhibit the function of the virus’s NA proteins [186]. Hatano et al. prepared a series of carbosilane dendrimers with hemagglutinin binding peptide against influenza virus (Table 2). The dendrimers showed strong inhibitory activities against human viruses A/PR/8/34 (H1N1) and A/Aichi/2/68 (H3N2) with IC50 values of 0.60 µm [155]. Landers et al. conjugated sialic acid-based polyaminoamine dendrimers for the inhibition of hemagglutinin adhesion of three influenza subtype A (H3N2, H2N2 and H3N2). In vivo results showed that the dendrimers were able to permanently inhibit infection caused by H3N2 but were not effective in preventing pneumonitis caused by an H2N2 subtype. Figure 16 shows a schematic representation of generation 4 sialic acid-conjugated polyaminoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers. PAMAM has highly branched functional groups that are useful for the encapsulation of sialic acid. PAMAM exhibited increased delivery of sialic acid and reduced toxicity hence preventing the hemagglutinin adhesion. Dendrimers are promising systems for the delivery of antiviral agents, but issues related to strain specificity must be resolved. Carbosilane dendrimers is the most suitable core scaffold for HA-binding peptide dendrimers [149] (Table 2).

5.5. Cervical Cancer

Cervical cancer is the second most life-threatening cancer among women especially in the developing countries including Africa, Asia and Latin America. Annually more than 200,000 deaths are reported [187]. Cervical cancer can be treated with radiotherapy or surgically if diagnosed at the early stage [188]. Although there are a numerous number of drugs to treat cervical cancer, most of them have developed side effects such as resistance and toxicity [188]. Chemotherapy is one method used to treat cancer; chemotherapy agents used to treat cervix cancer include cisplatin (Figure 17a), paclitaxel (Figure 17b), and topotecan (Figure 17c) [189]. The problem with chemotherapy is that patients often experience side effects such as hair loss, kidney damage and toxicity [190]. Toxicity occurs because the healthy cells are exposed to the toxic effects of the drugs [191]. Dendrimers can overcome poor immunogenicity and reduce the toxicity of peptide-based vaccines against cervical cancer [192]. Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the main cause of cervical cancer; hence there is a need to develop a new therapeutic HPV vaccine. This vaccine must be able to stimulate CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes that can eliminate HPV infected cells. E6 and E7 peptide dendrimers have been reported to inhibit the growth of HPV cells. This was confirmed by Lui et al., by developing polymer-peptide dendrimers for the treatment of HPV-related cancers. In vivo results showed that the formulation was able to reduce tumor growth and eliminate E7-expressing TC-1 tumors in mice [193]. Similar findings were also reported by Hussein et al., whereby peptide-dendrimers were found to eliminate over 50% tumor cells in vivo [194].
Mekuria et al. synthesized PAMAM dendrimers conjugated with two targeting moieties, IL-6 and RGB peptide (G4.5-lL6 and G4.5-RGD) for the targeted delivery to Hela cells. Both dendrimers were loaded with doxorubicin with an encapsulation efficiency of 51.3 and 30.1% for G4.5-lL6 and G4.5-RGB, respectively. G4.5-lL5/DOX dendrimers exhibited lower IC50, higher drug loading and sustained drug release rate compared to G4.5-RGB/DOX dendrimers [152] (Table 2). It was observed that G4.5-IL6 is a potential carrier for targeted drug delivery of doxorubicin to cervical cancer cells.
Dutta et al. formulated dendrimers-based siRNA against E7 and E6 cervical cancer (Table 2). Formulation of dendrimer-siRNA was done by optimization of nitrogen-to-phosphate targeting green fluorescence. The in vitro results showed that these dendrimers were able to inhibit target genes against E6 and E7 cervical cancer. The formulation was found to exhibit siGFP-entrapment efficiency of 49.76% ± 1.62%, vesicle size of 154 ± 1.73 nm, and zeta potential of +3.21 ± 0.07 mV, and also found to be non-toxic to the cells. These approaches can result in decreased side effects of the drugs used to treat cervical cancer, overcome drug resistance and increase the survival rates of individual infected by cervical cancer [151].

6. Conclusions

Dendrimers have been investigated as drug delivery systems for the treatment of viral and parasitic infections. However, there are very few reports on the application of dendrimers for the treatment of parasitic infections. In the treatment of leishmaniasis and toxoplamosis, the potential of the dendrimers to reduce the toxicity associated with amphotericin B and its macrophage targeting ability of the formulation was enhanced resulting in the significant killing of the parasite. The dendrimers were selective by delivering the drug to the parasite reservoir cells, phagocytes. Dendrimers have also been developed as vaccine carriers for the delivery of vaccine for the prevention of schistosomiasis infection which was characterized by IgG2a antibody response with an enhanced production of IL-2 and IFN-γ in vivo. In the treatment of malaria, the dendrimers exhibited specific targeting mechanism to the plasmodium red blood cells when compared to the non-infected red blood cells.
In the treatment of viral infections, dendrimers have the potential to inhibit herpes simplex virus. They hindered HSV-1 and HSV-2 attachment to the target cells. They also blocked the sexual transmission of HIV-1 and destabilized hepatitis C infection. These findings so far suggest that dendrimers are potential delivery systems for treatment of infectious diseases. However, there is a pressing need for more studies in order to fully understand their mode of action.

Funding

This research was funded by South Africa National Research Foundation (NRF), Govan Mbeki Research and Development Centre, University of Fort Hare, South Africa and South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) (Self-Initiated Research). The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and not of MRC, GMRDC or NRF.

Acknowledgments

The financial assistance of National Research Foundation (NRF) and Medical Research Council (MRC) (Self-Initiated Research), South Africa, towards this research is hereby acknowledged. The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and not of MRC or NRF.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lewis, K. Antibiotics: Recover the lost art of drug delivery. Nature 2012, 485, 439–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cole, S.T. Who will develop new antibacterial agents? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2014, 369, 20130430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Aderibigbe, B.A. Polymeric therapeutic delivery systems for the treatment of infectious diseases. Ther. Deliv. 2017, 8, 57–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Brownlie, J.; Peckham, C.; Waage, J.; Woolhouse, M.; Catherine Lyall, C.; Meagher, L.; Tait, J.; Baylis, M.; Nicoll, A. Infectious Diseases: Preparing for the Future—Future Threats; Office of Science and Innovation: London, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  5. National Institutes of Health (US). Understanding Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases. 2007. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20370/ (accessed on 30 December 2016).
  6. Jain, K.; Mehra, N.K.; Jain, N.K. Potentials and emerging trends in nanopharmacology. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2014, 15, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Van den Bruel, A.; Haj-Hassan, T.; Thompson, M.; Buntinx, F.; Mant, D. Diagnostic value of clinical features at presentation to identify serious infection in children in developed countries: A systematic review. Lancet 2010, 375, 834–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Clinical Infectious Disease—Introduction. Available online: www.microbiologybook.org (accessed on 19 April 2017).
  9. Murillo, A.; Vera-Estrella, R.; Barkla, B.J.; Méndez, E.; Arias, C.F. Identification of host cell factors associated with astrovirus replication in Caco-2 cells. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 10359–10370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ljubin-Sternak, S.; Mestrovic, T.J. Review: Clamydia trachonmatis and genital mycoplasmias: Pathogens with an impact on human reproductive health. J. Pathog. 2014, 183167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Potter, P. Summer buzz. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rosenberg, R.; Beard, C.B. Vector-borne infections. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 769–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Keen, E.C. Beyond phage therapy: Virotherapy of protozoal diseases. Future Microbiol. 2013, 8, 821–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hyman, P.; Atterbury, R.; Barrow, P. Fleas and smaller fleas: Virotherapy for parasite infections. Trends Microbiol. 2013, 21, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fernández de Mera, I.G.; Riz-Fons, F.; De La Fuente, G.; Mangold, A.J.; Gortázar, C.; De La Fuente, J. Spotted fever group rickettsiae in questing ticks, central Spain. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 1163–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Carabollo, H. Emergency department management of mosquito—borne illness: Malaria, dengue, and West Nile virus. Emerg. Med. Pract. 2014, 16, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  17. Collins, W.E. Plasmodium knowlesi: A malaria parasite of monkeys and humans. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2012, 57, 107–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Beare, N.A.; Lewallen, S.; Taylor, T.E.; Molyneux, M.E. Redefining cerebral malaria by including malaria retinopathy. Future Microbiol. 2011, 6, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. World Health Organization. Malaria Fact Sheet No. 94. 2014. Available online: https://reliefweb.int/report/world/malaria-fact-sheet-no-94-updated-march-2014 (accessed on 28 August 2014).
  20. Fenton Hall, B.; Antony, S. Malaria control, elimination and eradication: The role of the evolving biomedical research agenda. J. Infect. Dis. 2009, 200, 1639–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Bartoloni, A.; Zammarchi, L. Clinical aspects of uncomplicated and severe malaria. Mediterr. J. Hematol. Infect. Dis. 2012, 4, e2012026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Douglas, N.M.; Anstrey, N.M.; Buffet, P.A.; Poesspoprodjo, J.; Yeo, T.W.; Whiten, N.J. The anaemia of plasmodium vivax malaria. Malar. J. 2012, 11, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Moore, E.M.; Lockwood, D.N. Treatment of visceral leishmaniasis. J. Glob. Infect. Dis. 2010, 2, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. World Health Organization. Leishmaniasis Magnitude of the Problem. Available online: http://www.who.int/leishmaniasis/en/ (accessed on 17 February 2014).
  25. Lozano, R. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012, 380, 2095–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ejazi, S.A.; Ali, N. Developments in diagnosis and treatment of visceral leishmaniasis during the last decade and future prospects. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2013, 11, 79–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Dorlo, T.P.; Balasegaram, M.; Beijnen, J.H.; de Vries, P.J. Miltefosine: A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of leishmaniasis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 2576–2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bernstein, H.; Bernstein, C.; Michod, R.E. Sex in microbial pathogens. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2018, 57, 8–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Xiao, S.H. Mefloquine, a new type of compound against schistosomes and other helminthes in experimental studies. J. Parasitol. Res. 2013, 112, 3723–3740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Thétiot-Laurent, S.A.; Boissier, J.; Robert, A.; Meunier, B. Schistosomiasis chemotherapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 7936–7956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gryseels, B.; Polman, K.; Clerinx, J.; Kestens, L. Human schistosomiasis. Lancet 2006, 368, 1106–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Colley, D.G.; Bustinduy, A.L.; Secor, W.E.; King, C.H. Human schistosomiasis. Lancet 2014, 383, 2253–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Cook, T.B.; Brenner, L.A.; Cloninger, C.R.; Langenberg, P.; Igbide, A.; Giegling, I.; Hartmann, A.M.; Konte, B.; Friedl, M.; Brundin, L.; et al. Latent infection with Toxoplasma gondii: Association with trait aggression and impulsivity in healthy adults. Psychiatry Res. 2015, 60, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Webster, J.P.; Kaushik, M.; Bristow, G.C. Toxoplasma gondii infection, from predation to schizophrenia: Can animal behaviour help us understand human behaviour. J. Exp. Biol. 2013, 216, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Parlog, A.; Schlüter, D.; Dunay, I.R. Toxoplasma gondii-induced neuronal alterations. Parasite Immunol. 2015, 37, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Blanchard, N.; Dunay, I.R.; Schlüter, D. Persistence of Toxoplasma gondii in the central nervous system: A fine-tuned balance between the parasite, the brain and the immune system. Parasite Immunol. 2015, 37, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Dubey, J.P.; Ferreira, L.R.; Martins, J.; Jones, J.L. Sporulation and survival of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts in different types of commercial cat litter. J. Parasotol. Res. 2011, 97, 751–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hoffmann, B.; Voss, D.; Schlake, T.; Thess, A.; Kallen, K.J.; Stitz, L.; Kramps, T. Protective efficacy of in vitro synthesized, specific mRNA vaccines against influenza A virus infection. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30, 1210–1216. [Google Scholar]
  39. Adams, M.J.; Carstens, E.B. Ratification vote on taxonomic proposals to the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (2012). Arch. Virol. 2012, 157, 1411–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Stapleford, K.A.; Miller, D.J. Role of cellular lipids in positive-sense RNA virus replication complex assembly and function. Viruses 2010, 2, 1055–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. De Cock, K.M.; Jaffe, H.W.; Curran, J.W. The evolving epidemiology of HIV/AIDS. AIDS 2012, 26, 1205–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Pritchard, L.K.; Harvey, D.J.; Bonomelli, C.; Crispin, M.; Doores, K.J. Cell- and protein-directed glycosylation of native cleaved HIV-1 rnvelope. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 8932–8944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Abdool Karim, S.S.; Baxter, C. Microbicides and their implications in HIV prevention. Indian J. Med. Res. 2010, 132, 656–659. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Anton, P.A. Future prospects and perspectives on microbicides. Curr. HIV Res. 2012, 10, 113–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Permanyer, M.; Ballana, E.; Esté, J.A. Endocytosis of HIV: Anything goes. Trends Microbiol. 2010, 18, 543–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gibson, R.M.; Arts, E.J. Past, present, and future of entry inhibitors as HIV microbicides. Curr. HIV Res. 2012, 10, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Nel, A.M.; Coplan, P.; Smythe, S.C. Pharmacokinetic assessment of dapivirine vaginal microbicide gel in healthy, HIV-negative women. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 2010, 26, 1181–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ebell, M.H.; Call, M.; Shinholser, J. Effectiveness of oseltamivir in adults: A meta-analysis of published and unpublished clinical trials. J. Fam. Pract. 2013, 30, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Robison, S.G.; Dunn, A.G.; Richards, D.L.; Leman, R.F. Changes in influenza vaccination rates after withdrawal of live vaccine. NUMA 2017, 48, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Shaman, J.; Kohn, M. Absolute humidity modulates influenza survival, transmission, and seasonality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 3243–3248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Sheng, Z.; Ran, Z.; Wang, D.; Hoppe, A.D.; Simonson, R.; Chakravarty, S.; Hause, B.M.; Li, F. Genomic and evolutionary characterization of a novel influenza-C-like virus from swine. Arch. Virol. 2014, 159, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Udell, J.A.; Zawi, R.; Bhatt, D.L.; Keshtkar-Jahromi, M.; Gaughran, F.; Phrommintikul, A.; Ciszewski, A.; Vakili, H.; Hoffman, E.B.; Farkouh, M.E.; et al. Association between influenza vaccination and cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients: A meta-analysis. JAMA 2013, 310, 1711–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Mulligan, M.J.; Bernstein, D.I.; Winokur, P.; Rupp, R.; Anderson, E.; Rouphael, N.; Dickey, M.; Stapleton, J.T.; Edupuganti, S.; Spearman, P.; et al. Serological responses to an avian influenza A/H7N9 vaccine mixed at the point-of-use with MF59 adjuvant: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014, 312, 1409–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Petsch, B.; Schnee, M.; Vogel, A.B.; Lange, E.; Salomon, R.; Webster, R.G. The influenza virus enigma. Cell 2009, 136, 402–410. [Google Scholar]
  55. Jit, M.; Newall, AT.; Beutels, P. Key issues for estimating the impact and cost-effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccination strategies. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2013, 9, 834–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Newall, A.T.; Dehollain, J.P.; Creighton, P.; Beutel, P.; Wood, J.G. Understanding the cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination in children: Methodological choices and seasonal variability. Pharmacoeconomics 2013, 31, 693–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Raman, S.R. Fungal infections of the nervous system: current perspective and controversies in management. Int. J. Surg. 2010, 8, 591–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kauffman, C.A.; Pappas, P.G.; Patterson, T.F. Fungal infections associated with contaminated methylprednisolone injections. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 2495–2500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Perfect, J.R.; Dismukes, W.E.; Dromer, F.; Goldman, D.L.; Graybill, J.R.; Hamill, R.J.; Harrison, T.S.; Larsen, R.A.; Lortholary, O.; Nguyen, M.H.; et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2010, 50, 291–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Viral Meningitis. Available online: http://www.cdc.gov/meningitis/viral.html (accessed on 5 March 2016).
  61. Chiang, S.S.; Khan, F.A.; Milstein, M.B.; Tolman, A.W.; Benedetti, A.; Starke, J.R.; Becerra, M.C. Treatment outcomes of childhood tuberculous meningitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2014, 14, 947–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Durski, K.N.; Kuntz, K.M.; Yasukawa, K.; Virnig, B.A.; Meya, D.B.; Boulware, D.R. Cost-effective diagnostic checklists for meningitis in resource-limited settings. J. Acquir. Immune Dyndr. Hum. Retrovirol. 2013, 63, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Sakushima, K.; Hayashino, Y.; Kawaguchi, T.; Jackson, J.L.; Fukuhara, S. Diagnostic accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid lactate for differentiating bacterial meningitis from aseptic meningitis: A meta-analysis. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 62, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Bacterial Meningitis. Available online: https://wikivisually.com/wiki/Meningitis (accessed on 5 March 2016).
  65. Chen, F.; Xu, H.; Liu, J.; Cui, Y.; Luo, X.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Q.; Jiang, L. Efficacy and safety of nucleoside antiviral drugs for treatment of recurrent herpes labialis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2017, 46, 561–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Rotermann, M.; Langlois, K.A.; Severini, A.; Totten, S. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis and herpes simplex virus type 2: Results from the 2009 to 2011 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Public Health Rep. 2013, 24, 10–15. [Google Scholar]
  67. Xu, F.; Sternberg, M.R.; Gottlieb, S.L.; Berman, S.M.; Markowitz, L.E. Seroprevalence of herpes simplex virus type 2 among persons aged 14–49 years—United States, 2005–2008. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2010, 59, 456–459. [Google Scholar]
  68. Xu, F.; Fujie, X.; Sternberg, M.R.; Kottiri, B.J.; McQuillan, G.M.; Lee, F.K.; Nahmias, A.J.; Berman, S.M.; Markowitz, L.E. Trends in herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2 seroprevalence in the United States. JAMA 2006, 296, 964–973. [Google Scholar]
  69. Elad, S.; Zadik, Y.; Hewson, I.; Hovan, A.; Correa, M.E.; Logan, R.; Elting, L.S.; Spijkervet, F.K.; Brennan, M.T. A systematic review of viral infections associated with oral involvement in cancer patients: A spotlight on Herpesviridea. Support Care Cancer 2010, 18, 993–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Balasubramaniam, R.; Kuperstein, A.S.; Stoopler, E.T. Update on oral herpes virus infections. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 2014, 58, 265–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Treister, N.S.; Woo, S.B. Topical n-docosanol for management of recurrent herpes labialis. Expert. Opin. Pharmacother. 2010, 11, 853–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Wang, L.; Kourtis, A.P.; Ellington, S.; Legardy-Williams, J.; Bulterys, M. Safety of tenofovir during pregnancy for the mother and fetus: A systematic review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 57, 1773–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Suk, K.T.; Kim, D.J. Drug-induced liver injury: Present and future. Clin. Mol. Hepatol. 2012, 18, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Basra, S. Definition, epidemiology and magnitude of alcoholic hepatitis. World J. Hepatol. 2011, 3, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Shi, Z.; Yang, Y.; Ma, L.; Li, X.; Schreiber, A. Lamivudine in late pregnancy to interrupt in utero transmission of hepatitis B virus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010, 116, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Ebert, G.; Preston, S.; Allison, C.; Cooney, J.; Toe, J.G.; Stutz, M.D.; Ojaimi, S.; Scott, H.W.; Baschuk, N. Cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins prevent clearance of hepatitis B virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 5797–5802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Myers, R.P.; Krajden, M.; Bilodeau, M.; Kaita, K.; Marotta, P.; Peltekian, K.; Ramji, A.; Estes, C.; Razavi, H. Burden of disease and cost of chronic hepatitis C infection in Canada. Can. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014, 28, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Younossi, Z.M.; Kanwal, F.; Saab, S.; Brown, K.A.; El-Serag, H.B.; Kim, W.R.; Ahmed, A.; Kugelmas, M.; Gordon, S.C. The impact of hepatitis C burden: An evidence-based approach. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2014, 39, 518–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Benova, L.; Mohamoud, Y.A.; Calvert, C.; Abu-Raddad, L.J. Vertical transmission of hepatitis C virus: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014, 59, 765–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Gadducci, A.; Barsotti, C.; Cosio, S.; Domenici, L.; Genazzani, R.A. Smoking habit, immune suppression, oral contraceptive use, and hormone replacement therapy use and cervical carcinogenesis: A review of the literature. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2011, 27, 597–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Tran, N.P.; Hung, C.F.; Roden, R.; Wu, T.C. Control of HPV infection and related cancer through vaccination. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2014, 193, 149–171. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Luhn, P.; Walker, J.; Schiffman, M.; Zuna, R.E.; Dunn, S.T.; Gold, M.A.; Smith, K.; Mathews, C.; Allen, R.A.; Zhang, R.; et al. The role of co-factors in the progression from human papillomavirus infection to cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2013, 128, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Remschmidt, C.; Kaufmann, A.M.; Hagemann, I.; Vartazarova, E.; Wichmann, O.; Deleré, Y. Risk factors for cervical human papillomavirus infection and high-grade intraepithelial lesion in women aged 20 to 31 years in Germany. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2013, 23, 519–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Mintzer, M.A.; Dane, E.L.; O’Toole, G.A.; Grinstaff, M.W. Exploiting dendrimer multivalency to combat emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. Mol. Pharm. 2012, 9, 342–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. O’Brien, D.J.; Gould, I.M. Maximizing the impact of antimicrobial stewardship. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 26, 352–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Klajnert, B.; Bryszewska, M. Dendrimers: Properties and applications. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2001, 48, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  87. Esfand, R.; Tomalia, D.A. Poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimers: From biomimicry to drug delivery and biomedical applications. Drug Discov. Today 2001, 6, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. World Health Organization (WHO). The Top 10 Causes of Death. Available online: http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death (accessed on 24 September 2015).
  89. Reddy, M.; Gill, S.S.; Wu, W.; Kalkar, S.R.; Rochon, P.A. Does this patient have an infection of a chronic wound? JAMA 2012, 307, 605–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Svenson, S.; Tomalia, D.A. Dendrimers in biomedical applications-reflections on the field. Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 2012, 64, 102–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Soto-Castro, D.; Cruz-Morales, J.A.; Ramírez Apan, M.T.; Guadarrama, P. Solubilization and anticancer-activity enhancement of Methotrexate by novel dendrimeric nanodevices synthesized in one-step reaction. Bioorg. Chem. 2012, 41–42, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Chahal, J.S.; Khan, O.F.; Cooper, C.L.; McPartlan, J.S.; Tsosie, J.K.; Tilley, L.D.; Sidik, S.M.; Lourido, S.; Langer, R.; Bavari, S.; et al. Dendrimer RNA nanoparticles generate protective immunity against lethal Ebola, H1N1 influenza, and Toxoplasma gondii challenges with a single dose. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 4133–4142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Yandrapu, S.K.; Kanujia, P.; Chalasani, K.B.; Mangamoori, L.; Kolapalli, R.V.; Chauhan, A. Development and optimization of thiolated dendrimer as a viable mucoadhesive excipient for the controlled drug delivery: An acyclovir model formulation. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2013, 9, 514–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Kim, B.Y.; Rutka, J.T.; Chan, W.C. Nanomedicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 2434–2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Han, S.; Kanamoto, T.; Nakashima, H.; Yoshida, T. Synthesis of a new amphiphilic glycodendrimer with antiviral functionality. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 90, 1061–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Nanjwade, B.K.; Bechra, H.M.; Derkar, G.K.; Manvi, F.V.; Nanjwade, V.K. Dendrimers: Emerging polymers for drug-delivery systems. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2009, 38, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Gangadharan, D.; Dhandhala, N.; Dixit, D.; Thakur, R.S.; Popat, K.M.; Anand, P.S. Investigation of solid supported dendrimers for water disinfection. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2012, 124, 138491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Lim, Y.; Kim, S.; Lee, Y.; Lee, W.; Yang, T.; Lee, M.; Suh, H.; Park, J. Cationic hyperbranched poly (amino ester): A novel class of DNA condensing molecule with cationic surface, biodegradable three-dimensional structure, and tertiary amine groups in the interior. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2460–2461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Lalwani, S.; Chouai, A.; Perez, L.M.; Santiago, V.; Shaunak, S.; Simanek, E.E. Mimicking PAMAM dendrimers with ampholytic, hybrid triazine dendrimers: A comparison of dispersity and stability. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 6723–6732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Kaur, D.; Jain, K.; Mehra, N.K.; Kesharwani, P.; Jain, N.K. A review on comparative study of PPI and PAMAM dendrimers. J. Nanopart. Res. 2016, 18, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kolhe, P.; Khandare, J.; Pillai, O.; Kannan, S.; Lieh-Lai, M.; Kannan, R.M. Preparation, cellular transport, and activity of polyamidoamine-based dendritic nanodevices with a high drug payload. Biomaterials 2006, 27, 660–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Shukla, S.K.; Govender, P.P.; Tiwari, A. Polymeric micellar structures for viosensor technology. Adv. Biomembr. Lipid Self Assem. 2016, 24, 143–161. [Google Scholar]
  103. Ohsaki, M.; Okuda, T.; Wada, A.; Hirayama, T.; Niidome, T.; Aoyagi, H. In vitro gene transfection using dendritic poly(l-lysine). Bioconj. Chem. 2002, 13, 510–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Den Boer, M.; Argaw, D.; Jannin, J.; Alvar, J. Leishmaniasis impact and treatment access. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011, 17, 1471–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Danesh-Bahreini, M.A.; Shokri, J.; Samiei, A.; Kamali-Sarvestani, E.; BarzegarJalali, M.; Mohammadi-Samani, S. Nanovaccine for leishmaniasis: Preparation of chitosan nanoparticles containing Leishmania superoxide dismutase and evaluation of its immunogenicity in BALB/c mice. Int. J. Nanomed. 2011, 6, 835–842. [Google Scholar]
  106. Carlsen, E.D.; Liang, Y.; Shelite, T.R.; Walker, D.H.; Melby, P.C.; Soong, L. Permissive and protective roles for neutrophils in leishmaniasis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2015, 182, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Guerra, J.A.; Prestes, S.R.; Silveira, H.; Coelho, L.I.; Gama, P.; Moura, A.; Amato, V.; Barbosa, M.; Ferreira, L.C. Mucosal leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis and Leishmania (Viannia) guyanensis in the Brazilian Amazon. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2011, 5, 980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Mohamed-Ahmed, A.H.; Brocchini, S.; Croft, S.L. Recent advances in development of amphotericin B formulations for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 25, 695–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Van Griensven, J.; Balasegaram, M.; Meheus, F.; Alvar, J.; Lynen, L.; Boelaert, M. Combination therapy for visceral leishmaniasis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2010, 10, 184–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ritmeijer, K.; TerHorst, R.; Chaneetal, S. Limited effectiveness of high-dose liposomal amphotericin B(AmBisome) for treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in anethiopian population with high HIV prevalence. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 53, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Tiuman, T.S.; Santos, A.O.; Ueda-Nakamura, T.; Filho, B.P.D.; Nakamura, C.V. Recent advances in leishmaniasis treatment. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 15, 525–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Meheus, F.; Balasegaram, M.; Olliaroetal, P. Cost-effectiveness analysis of combination therapies for visceral leishmaniasis in the Indian subcontinent. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2010, 4, e818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Menezes, J.P.B.; Almeida, T.F.; Petersen, A.L.O.A.; Guedes, C.E.S.; Mota, M.S.V.; Lima, J.G.B.; Palma, L.C.; Buck, G.A.; Krieger, M.A.; Probst, C.M.; et al. Proteomic analysis reveals differentially expressed proteins in macrophages infected with Leishmania amazonensis or Leishmania major. Microb. Infect. 2013, 15, 579–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Menezes, J.P.B.; Guedes, C.E.S.; Petersen, A.L.O.A.; Fraga, D.B.M.; Veras, P.S.T. Advances in development of new treatment for leishmaniasis. BioMed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 815023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Croft, S.L.; Olliaro, P. Leishmaniasis chemotherapy—challenges and opportunities. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011, 17, 1478–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Jain, K.; Verma, A.K.; Mishra, P.R.; Jain, N.K. Characterization and evaluation of amphotericin B loaded conjugated poly (propylene imine) dendrimers. Nanomedicine 2015, 11, 705–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Daftarian, P.M.; Stone, G.W.; Kovalski, L.; Kumar, M.; Vosoughi, A.; Urbieta, M.; Blackwelder, P.; Dikici, E.; Serafini, P.; Duffort, S.; et al. A targeted and adjuvanted nanocarrier lowers the effective dose of liposomal amphotericin B and enhances adaptive immunity in murine cutaneous leishmaniasis. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 208, 1914–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Jain, K.; Verma, K.A.; Mishra, P.R.; Jaina, N.K. Surface-engineered dendrimeric nanoconjugates for macrophage targeted delivery of amphotericin B: Formulation development and in vitro and in vivo Evaluation. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 208, 1914–1922. [Google Scholar]
  119. Behnke, M.S.; Wootton, J.C.; Lehmann, M.M.; Radke, J.B.; Lucas, O.; Nawas, J.; Sibley, L.D.; White, M.W. Coordinated progression through two subtranscriptomes underlies the tachyzoite cycle of Toxoplasma gondii. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, 12354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Wang, X.; Xing, Y.; Qu, G.; Li, X.; Dai, J.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, X. PAMAM-Lys, a novel vaccine delivery vector, enhances the protective effects of the SjC23 DNA vaccine against schistosoma japonicum infection. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, 86578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Movellan, J.; Urbán, P.; Moles, E.; de la Fuente, J.M.; Sierra, T.; Serrano, J.L.; Fernàndez-Busquets, X. Amphiphilic dendritic derivatives as nanocarriers for the targeted delivery of antimalarial drugs. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 7940–7950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Agrawal, P.; Gupta, U.; Jain, N.K. Glycoconjugated peptide dendrimers-based nanoparticulate system for the delivery of chloroquine phosphate. Biomaterials 2007, 28, 3349–3359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Fomovska, A.; Wood, R.D.; Mui, E.J.; Dubey, J.P.; Ferriera, L.R.; Hickman, M.R.; Lee, P.J.; Leed, S.E.; Auschwitz, J.M.; Welsh, W.J.; et al. Salicylanilide inhibitors of Toxoplasma gondii. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 8375–8391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Astruc, D.; Boisselier, E.; Ornelas, C. Dendrimers designed for functions: From physical, photophysical, and supramolecular properties to applications in sensing, catalysis, molecular electronics, photonics, and nanomedicine. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 1857–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Augagneur, Y.; Wesolowski, D.; Tae, H.S.; Altman, S.; Mamoun, C.B. Gene selective mRNA cleavage inhibits the development of Plasmodium falciparum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 6235–6240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Moulton, H.M. Cell-penetrating peptides enhance systemic delivery of antisense morpholino oligomers. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 867, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  127. Lai, B.; William, H.; Witola, W.H.; Bissati, K.E.; Zhou, Y.; Mui, E.; Fomovska, A.; McLeod, R. Molecular target validation, antimicrobial delivery, and potential treatment of Toxoplasma gondii infections. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 14182–14187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Prieto, M.J.; Bacigalupe, D.; Pardini, O.; Amalvy, J.I.; Venturini, C.; Morilla, M.J.; Romero, E.L. Nanomolar cationic dendrimeric sulfadiazine as potential antitoxoplasmic agent. Int. J. Pharm. 2006, 326, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Grimes, J.E.T.; Croll, D.; Harrison, W.E.; Utzinger, J.; Freeman, M.C.; Templeton, M.R. The relationship between water, sanitation and schistosomiasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014, 8, e3296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  130. Wang, L.D.; Guo, J.; Wu, X.; Chen, H.; Wang, T.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, Z.H.; Steinmann, P.; Yang, G.J.; Wang, S.P.; et al. China’s new strategy to block Schistosoma japonicum transmission: Experiences and impact beyond schistosomiasis. Trop. Med. Int. Health. 2009, 14, 1475–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Fenwick, A.; Webster, J.P. Schistosomiasis: Challenges for control, treatment and drug resistance. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2006, 19, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Doenhoff, M.J.; Mattoccia, P.L. Praziquantel for the treatment of schistosomiasis: Its use for control in areas with endemic disease and prospects for drug resistance. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. 2006, 4, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Sikwal, D.R.; Kalhapure, R.S.; Govender, T. An emerging class of amphiphilic dendrimers for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications: Janus amphiphilic dendrimers. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 97, 113–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. World Health Organization (WHO). Malaria Factsheet Updated January 2016. Available online: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs094/en/ (accessed on 18 February 2016).
  135. World Health Organization (WHO). World Malaria Report 2015. Available online: http://www.who.int/malaria/media/world-malaria-report-2015/en/ (accessed on 19 April 2016).
  136. Baird, J.K. Evidence and implications of mortality associated with acute Plasmodium vivax malaria. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 26, 36–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Hartman, T.K.; Rogerson, S.J.; Fischer, P.R. The impact of maternal malaria on newborns. Ann. Trop. Pediatr. 2010, 30, 271–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Taylor, W.R.; Hanson, J.; Turner, G.D.; White, N.J.; Dondorp, A.M. Respiratory manifestations of malaria. Chest 2012, 142, 492–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Aditya, N.P.; Vathsala, P.G.; Vieirra, V.; Murthym, R.S.R.; Souto, E.B. Andvances in nanomedicines for malaria treatment. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 201–202, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Doitsh, G.; Galloway, N.L.K.; Geng, X.; Yang, Z.; Monroe, K.M.; Zepeda, O.; Hunt, P.W.; Hatano, H.; Sowinski, S.; Muñoz-Arias, I.; et al. Cell death by pyroptosis drives CD4 T-cell depletion in HIV-1 infection. Nature 2014, 505, 509–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  141. Buckheit, R.W.; Watson, K.M.; Morrow, K.M.; Ham, A.S. Development of topical microbicides to prevent the sexual transmission of HIV. Antivir. Res. 2010, 85, 142–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Peng, J.; Wu, Z.; Qi, X.; Chen, Y.; Li, X. Dendrimers as potential therapeutic tools in HIV inhibition. Molecules 2013, 18, 7912–7929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Tefanidou, M.; Herrera, C.; Armanasco, N.; Shattock, R.J. Saquinavir inhibits early events associated with establishment of HIV-1 infection: Potential role for protease inhibitors in prevention. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 4381–4390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Veazey, R.S.; Ketas, T.J. Dufour, J.; Moroney-Rasmussen, T.; Green, L.C.; Klasse, P.J.; Moore, J.P. Protection of rhesus macaques from vaginal infection by vaginally delivered maraviroc, an inhibitor of HIV-1 entry via the CCR5 co-receptor. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 202, 739–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. De Clercq, E. Where rilpivirine meets with tenofovir, the start of a new anti-HIV drug combination era. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2012, 84, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Tyssen, D.; Henderson, S.A.; Johnson, A.; Sterjovski, J.; Moore, K.; La, J.; Zanin, M.; Sonza, S.; Karellas, P.; Giannis, M.P.; et al. Structure activity relationship of dendrimer microbicides with dual action antiviral activity. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e12309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Mallipeddi, R.; Rohan, L.C. Progress in antiretroviral drug delivery using nanotechnology. Int. J. Nanomed. 2010, 5, 533–547. [Google Scholar]
  148. Enrique Vacas-Córdoba, E.V.; Galán, M.; De La Mata, F.J.; Gómez, R.; Pion, M.; Muñoz-Fernández, M.A. Enhanced activity of carbosilane dendrimers against HIV when combined with reverse transcriptase inhibitor drugs: Searching for more potent microbicides. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 3591–3600. [Google Scholar]
  149. Landers, J.J.; Cao, Z.; Lee, I.; Piehler, L.T.; Myc, P.P.; Myc, A.; Hamouda, T.; Galecki, A.T.; Baker, J.R. Prevention of influenza pneumonitis by sialic acid—Conjugated dendritic polymers. J. Infect. Dis. 2002, 186, 1222–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Luganini, A.; Nicoletto, S.F.; Pizzuto, L.; Pirri, G.; Giuliani, A.; Landolfo, S.; Gribaudo, G. Inhibition of herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2 infections by peptide-derivatized dendrimers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 3231–3239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Dutta, T.; Burgess, M.; McMillan, N.A.; Parekh, H.S. Dendrosome-based delivery of siRNA against E6 and E7 oncogenes in cervical cancer. Nanomedicine 2010, 6, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Mekuria, S.L.; Debele, T.A.; Chou, H.Y.; Tsai, H.C. IL-6 antibody and RGD peptide conjugated poly (amidoamine) dendrimer for targeted drug delivery of HeLa cells. J. Phys. Chem. B 2016, 120, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Sepúlveda-Crespo, D.; Sánchez-Rodríguez, J.; Serramía, M.J.; Gómez, R.; De La Mata, F.J.; José Luis Jiménez, J.L.; Muñoz-Fernández, M.A. Triple combination of carbosilane dendrimers, tenofovir and maraviroc as potential microbicide to prevent HIV-1 sexual transmission. Nanomedicine 2015, 10, 899–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Ceña-Dıez, R.; Sepúlveda-Crespo, D.; Malyde, M.; Muñoz-Fern´andez, M. Dendrimeric based microbicides against sexual transmitted infections associated to heparin sulfate. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 46755–46764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Ken Hatano, K.; Teruhiko Matsubara, T.; Yosuke Muramatsu, Y.; Masakazu Ezure, M.; Tetsuo Koyama, T.; Koji Matsuoka, K.; Ryunosuke Kuriyama, R.; Haruka Kori, H.; Toshinori Sato, T. Synthesis and influenza virus inhibitory activities of carbosilane dendrimers peripherally functionalized with hemagglutinin-binding peptide. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 8332–8339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Sepúlveda-Crespo, D.; Jiménez, J.L.; Gómez, R.; De La Mata, F.J.; Majano, P.L.; Muñoz-Fernández, M.; Gastaminza, P. Polyanionic carbosilane dendrimers prevent hepatitis C virus infection in cell culture. Nanomedicine 2017, 13, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Ceña-Diez, R.; Vacas-Córdoba, E.; García-Broncano, P.; de la Mata, F.J.; Gómez, R.; Maly, M.; Muñoz-Fernández, M.Á. Prevention of vaginal and rectal herpes simplex virus type 2 transmission in mice: Mechanism of antiviral action. Int. J. Nanomed. 2016, 11, 2147. [Google Scholar]
  158. Chonco, L.; Pion, M.; Vacas, E.; Rasines, B.; Maly, M.; Serramia, M.J.; Lopez-Fernandez, L.; de la Mata, J.; Alvarez, S.; Gomez, R.; et al. Carbosilane dendrimer nanotechnology outlines of the broad HIV blocker profile. J. Control. Release 2012, 161, 949–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Jiménez, J.L.; Clemente, M.I.; Weber, N.D.; Sanchez, J.; Ortega, P.; de la Mata, F.J.; Gómez, R.; García, D.; López-Fernández, L.A.; Muñoz-Fernández, M.Á. Carbosilane dendrimers to transfect human astrocytes with small interfering RNA targeting human immunodeficiency virus. BioDrugs 2010, 24, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Jain, S.K.; Sharma, A.; Mahajan, M.; Sankar, R. In-vitro and in-vivo evaluation of poly(propyl ether imine) (PETIM) dendrimer for sustained delivery of zdovudine. J. Antivir. Antiretrovir. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Lakshminarayanan, A.; Reddy, B.U.; Raghav, N.; Ravi, V.K.; Kumar, A.; Maiti, P.K.; Sood, A.K.; Jayaraman, N.; Das, S. A galactose-functionalized dendritic siRNA-nanovector to potentiate hepatitis C inhibition in liver cells. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 16921–16931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  162. Tarallo, R.; Carberry, T.P.; Falanga, A.; Vitiello, M.; Galdiero, S.; Galdiero, M.; Weck, M. Dendrimers functionalized with membrane-interacting peptides for viral inhibition. Int. J. Nanomed. 2013, 8, 521–534. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
  163. Zhou, J.; Neff, C.P.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Li, H.; Smith, D.D.; Swiderski, P.; Aboellail, T.; Huang, Y.; Du, Q.; et al. Systemic administration of combinatorial dsiRNAs via nanoparticles efficiently suppresses HIV-1 infection in humanized mice. Mol. Ther. 2011, 19, 2228–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Telwatte, S.; Moore, K.; Johnson, A.; Tyssen, D.; Sterjovski, J.; Aldunate, M.; Gorry, P.R.; Ramsland, P.A.; Lewis, G.R.; Paull, J.R.; et al. Virucidal activity of the dendrimer microbicide SPL7013 against HIV-1. Antivir. Res. 2011, 90, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Han, S.; Yoshida, D.; Kanamoto, T.; Nakashima, H.; Uryu, T.; Yoshida, T. Sulfated oligosaccharide cluster with polylysine core scaffold as a new anti-HIV dendrimer. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 80, 1111–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Borges, A.R.; Wieczorek, L.; Johnson, B.; Benesi, A.J.; Brown, B.K.; Kensinger, R.D.; Krebs, F.C.; Wigdahl, B.; Blumenthal, R.; Puri, A.; et al. Multivalent dendrimeric compounds containing carbohydrates expressed on immune cells inhibit infection by primary isolates of HIV-1. Virology 2010, 408, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  167. Doménech, R.; Abian, O.; Bocanegra, R.; Correa, J.; Sousa-Hervesm, A.; Riguera, R.; Mateu, M.G.; Fernandez-Megia, E.; Velázquez-Campoy, A.; Neira, J.L. Dendrimers as potential inhibitors of the dimerization of the capsid protein of HIV-1. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11, 2069–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Price, C.F.; Tyssen, D.; Sonza, S.; Davie, A.; Evans, S.; Lewis, G.R.; Xia, S.; Spelman, T.; Hodsman, P.; Moench, T.R.; et al. SPL7013 Gel (VivaGel®) retains potent HIV-1 and HSV-2 inhibitory activity following vaginal administration in humans. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e24095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Ionov, M.; Ciepluch, K.; Klajnert, B.; Glińska, S.; Gomez-Ramirez, R.; de la Mata, F.J.; Munoz-Fernandez, M.A.; Bryszewska, M. Complexation of HIV derived peptides with carbosilane dendrimers. Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces 2013, 101, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. De Las Cuevas, N.; Garcia-Gallego, S.; Rasines, B.; de la Mata, F.J.; Guijarro, G.L.; Munoz-Fernandez, M.A.; Gómez, R. In vitro studies of water-stable cationic carbosilane dendrimers as delivery vehicles for gene therapy against HIV and hepatocarcinoma. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012, 19, 5052–5061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Briz, V.; Serramia, M.; Madrid, R.; Hameau, A.; Caminade, A.-M.; Majoral, J.; Munoz-Fernandez, M. Validation of a generation 4 phosphorus-containing polycationic dendrimer for gene delivery against HIV-1. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012, 19, 5044–5051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Suazo, P.A.; Tognarelli, E.I.; Kalergis, A.M.; González, P.A. Herpes simplex virus 2 infection: Molecular association with HIV and novel microbicides to prevent disease. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2015, 204, 161–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Noguchi, L.; Hillier, S.; Richardson, B.; Chirenje, Z.; Balkus, J.; Piper, J.; Marrazzo, J. 018-2 Injectable progestin contraception and acquisition of hsv-2 infection among South African women participating in the voice trial. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2015, 91, e65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Bastien, S.; Mason-Jones, A.; De Koker, P.; Mmbaga, E.; Ross, D.; Mathews, C. Herpes simplex virus type 2 infection as a biomarker for sexual debut among young people in sub-Saharan Africa: A literature review. Int. J. STD AIDS 2012, 23, e761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Astruc, D.; Liang, L.; Rapakousiou, A.; Ruiz, J. Click dendrimers and triazole-related aspects: Catalysts, mechanism, synthesis, and functions. A bridge between dendritic architectures and nanomaterials. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 630–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Carberry, T.P.; Tarallo, R.; Falanga, A.; Finamore, E.; Galdiero, M.; Weck, M.; Galdiero, S. Dendrimer functionalization with a membrane-interacting domain of herpes simplex virus type 1: Towards intracellular delivery. Chemistry 2012, 18, 13678–13685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Tarallo, R.; Accardo, A.; Falanga, A.; Guarnieri, D.; Vitiello, G.; Netti, P.; D’Errico, G.; Morelli, G.; Galdiero, S. Clickable functionalization of liposomes with the gH625 peptide from Herpes simplex virus type I for intracellular drug delivery. Chemistry 2011, 17, 12659–12668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Shivkumar, S.; Peeling, R.; Jafari, Y.; Joseph, L.; Pant Pai, N. Accuracy of rapid and point-of-care screening tests for hepatitis C: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Intern. Med. 2012, 157, 558–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Singh, S. Nanomedicine-nanoscale drugs and delivery systems. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2010, 10, 7906–7918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Walter, M.V.; Malkoch, M. Simplifying the synthesis of dendrimers: Accelerated approaches. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 4593–4609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Heegaard, P.M.H.; Boas, U.; Sorensen, N.S. Dendrimers for vaccine and immunostimulatory uses: A review. Bioconjug. Chem. 2010, 21, 405–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Khosravy, M.S.; Ardestani, M.S.; Cohan, R.A.; Doroud, D.; Amini, S.; Momen, S.B.; Atyabi, S.M.; Heydari, H.; Vahabpour, R. Design, synthesis, physicochemical and immunological characterization of dendrimer-HBsAg conjugate. Vacres 2014, 1, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Beck, C.R.; McKenzie, B.C.; Hashim, A.B.; Harris, R.C.; Nguyen-Van-TDesam, J.S. Influenza vaccination for immunocompromised patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis by etiology. J. Infect. Dis. 2012, 206, 1250–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Newall, A.T.; Kelly, H.; Harsley, S.; Scuffham, P.A. Cost effectiveness of influenza vaccination in older adults: A critical review of economic evaluations for the 50- to 64-year age group. Pharmacoeconomics 2009, 27, 439–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Ahmed, F.; Lindley, M.C.; Allred, N.; Weinbaum, C.M.; Grohskopf, L. Effect of influenza vaccination of healthcare personnel on morbidity and mortality among patients: Systematic review and grading of evidence. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014, 58, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Dolan, G.P.; Harris, R.C.; Clarkson, M.; Sokal, R.; Morgan, G.; Mukaigawara, M.; Horiuchi, H.; Hale, R.; Stormont, L.; Béchard-Evans, L.; et al. Vaccination of healthcare workers to protect patients at increased risk of acute respiratory disease: Summary of a systematic review. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses 2013, 7, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Shazly, S.A.M.; Murad, M.H.; Dowdy, S.C.; Gostout, B.S.; Famuyide, A.O. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol. Oncol. 2015, 138, 457–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Aggarwal, P. Cervical cancer: Can it be prevented? World. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 5, 775–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Lorusso, D.; Petrelli, F.; Coinu, A.; Raspagliesi, F.; Barni, S. A systematic review comparing cisplatin and carboplatin plus paclitaxel-based chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2014, 133, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Pfaendler, K.S.; Tewari, K.S. Changing paradigms in the systemic treatment of advanced cervical cancer. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 214, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  191. Joshi, J.R.; Patel, R.P. Role of biodegradable polymers in drug delivery. Int. J. Curr. Pharm. Res. 2012, 4, 74–81. [Google Scholar]
  192. Kesharwani, P.; Banerjee, S.; Gupta, U.; Mohd Amin, M.C.I.; Padhye, S.; Sarkar, F.H.; Iyer, A.K. Pamam dendrimers as promising nanocarriers for RNAi therapeutics. Mater. Today 2015, 18, 565–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Liu, T.Y.; Hussein, W.M.; Jia, Z.; Ziora, Z.M.; McMillan, N.A.; Monteiro, M.J.; Toth, I.; Skwarczynski, M. Self-adjuvanting polymer-peptide conjugates as therapeutic vaccine candidates against cervical cancer. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 2798–2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  194. Hussein, W.M.; Liu, T.Y.; Jia, Z.; McMillan, N.A.J.; Monteiro, M.J.; Toth, I.; Skwarczynski, M. Multiantigenic peptide-polymer conjugates as therapeutic vaccines against cervical cancer. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2016, 24, 4372–4380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 23 02205 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of dendrimers (G1–G4).
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of dendrimers (G1–G4).
Molecules 23 02205 g001
Molecules 23 02205 g002a 550Molecules 23 02205 g002b 550Molecules 23 02205 g002c 550
Figure 2. Schematic representation of dendrimers and their applications, (a) PAMAM-G3 dendrimers for drug delivery; (b) PAMAM-G1 dendrimers for tissue engineering; (c) PLL dendrimers for gene delivery; and (d) PPI dendrimers for diagnosis.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of dendrimers and their applications, (a) PAMAM-G3 dendrimers for drug delivery; (b) PAMAM-G1 dendrimers for tissue engineering; (c) PLL dendrimers for gene delivery; and (d) PPI dendrimers for diagnosis.
Molecules 23 02205 g002aMolecules 23 02205 g002bMolecules 23 02205 g002c
Molecules 23 02205 g003 550
Figure 3. Antileishmaniasis drugs (a) Miltefosine; (b) Sodium stibogluconate; (c) Amphotericin B; (d) Paromomycin.
Figure 3. Antileishmaniasis drugs (a) Miltefosine; (b) Sodium stibogluconate; (c) Amphotericin B; (d) Paromomycin.
Molecules 23 02205 g003
Molecules 23 02205 g004 550
Figure 4. Dendrimer loaded with amphotericin B.
Figure 4. Dendrimer loaded with amphotericin B.
Molecules 23 02205 g004
Molecules 23 02205 g005 550
Figure 5. Anti-toxoplasmosis drugs: Pyrimethamine (a); Sulfadoxine (b).
Figure 5. Anti-toxoplasmosis drugs: Pyrimethamine (a); Sulfadoxine (b).
Molecules 23 02205 g005
Molecules 23 02205 g006 550
Figure 6. Schematic representation of PPMO with transductive peptide.
Figure 6. Schematic representation of PPMO with transductive peptide.
Molecules 23 02205 g006
Molecules 23 02205 g007 550
Figure 7. The anti-schistosomiasis drug: Praziquantel.
Figure 7. The anti-schistosomiasis drug: Praziquantel.
Molecules 23 02205 g007
Molecules 23 02205 g008 550
Figure 8. Antimalarials drugs: Primaquine (a); Chloroquine (b); Artemisinin (c).
Figure 8. Antimalarials drugs: Primaquine (a); Chloroquine (b); Artemisinin (c).
Molecules 23 02205 g008
Molecules 23 02205 g009 550
Figure 9. Schematic presentation of Amphiphilic dendrimers (R = C17H35, X = H2N).
Figure 9. Schematic presentation of Amphiphilic dendrimers (R = C17H35, X = H2N).
Molecules 23 02205 g009
Molecules 23 02205 g010 550
Figure 10. Antiretroviral drugs: Efavirenz (a), Zidovudine (b), Tenofovir (c).
Figure 10. Antiretroviral drugs: Efavirenz (a), Zidovudine (b), Tenofovir (c).
Molecules 23 02205 g010
Molecules 23 02205 g011 550
Figure 11. Second generation cationic carbosilane dendrimers branched with carbon-silicon bonds.
Figure 11. Second generation cationic carbosilane dendrimers branched with carbon-silicon bonds.
Molecules 23 02205 g011
Molecules 23 02205 g012 550
Figure 12. Generic representation of peptide dendrimers.
Figure 12. Generic representation of peptide dendrimers.
Molecules 23 02205 g012
Molecules 23 02205 g013 550
Figure 13. The anti-herpes simplex drug: Acyclovir.
Figure 13. The anti-herpes simplex drug: Acyclovir.
Molecules 23 02205 g013
Molecules 23 02205 g014 550
Figure 14. Anti-hepatitis drugs: Sofosbuvir (a); Ribavirin (b).
Figure 14. Anti-hepatitis drugs: Sofosbuvir (a); Ribavirin (b).
Molecules 23 02205 g014
Molecules 23 02205 g015 550
Figure 15. Anti-influenza drugs: Oseltamivir (a); Amantadine (b); Rimantadine (c).
Figure 15. Anti-influenza drugs: Oseltamivir (a); Amantadine (b); Rimantadine (c).
Molecules 23 02205 g015
Molecules 23 02205 g016 550
Figure 16. Generation 4 PAMAM sialic acid-based dendrimers.
Figure 16. Generation 4 PAMAM sialic acid-based dendrimers.
Molecules 23 02205 g016
Molecules 23 02205 g017 550
Figure 17. Anticancer drugs: Cisplatin (a); Paclitaxel (b); Topotecan (c).
Figure 17. Anticancer drugs: Cisplatin (a); Paclitaxel (b); Topotecan (c).
Molecules 23 02205 g017
Table
Table 1. Various dendrimers for parasitic diseases.
Table 1. Various dendrimers for parasitic diseases.
Dendrimers ClassificationCombination with Type of DrugsType of InfectionReferences
PPIAmphotericin BLeishmaniasis[116,118]
PAASulfadoxine, chloroquine and primaquineToxoplamosis[118,119]
PAMAMDNA
Chloroquine and primaquine		Schistosomiasis
Malaria		[120]
[121]
Poly-l-lysineChloroquineMalaria[122]
Table
Table 2. Various dendrimers for viral diseases.
Table 2. Various dendrimers for viral diseases.
Dendrimers ClassificationCombination with Type of DrugsType of InfectionReferences
PAADNAInfluenza[149]
Peptide dendrimersAcyclovirHerpes[150]
siRNACervical cancer[151]
DoxorubicinCervical cancer[152]
Carbosilane dendrimersZidovudine, efarvenz and tenofovirHIV[148]
Maraviroc and tenofovirHIV[153]
Heparan sulfateHerpes[154]
OseltamivirInfluenza[155]
SofosbuvirHepatitis[156]
Acyclovir and tenofovirHerpes[157]
MicrobicideHIV[158]
siRNAHIV[159]
PPIZidovudineHIV[160]
PETIMsiRNAHepatitis[161]
PAGlycoprotein HHerpes[162]
PAMAMHeparan sulphateHerpes[154]
siRNAHIV[163]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mhlwatika, Z.; Aderibigbe, B.A. Application of Dendrimers for the Treatment of Infectious Diseases. Molecules 2018, 23, 2205. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23092205

AMA Style

Mhlwatika Z, Aderibigbe BA. Application of Dendrimers for the Treatment of Infectious Diseases. Molecules. 2018; 23(9):2205. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23092205

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mhlwatika, Zandile, and Blessing Atim Aderibigbe. 2018. "Application of Dendrimers for the Treatment of Infectious Diseases" Molecules 23, no. 9: 2205. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23092205

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop