Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Glutaraldehyde Cross-Linking of Immobilized Thermophilic Esterase on Hydrophobic Macroporous Resin for Application in Poly(ε-caprolactone) Synthesis
Previous Article in Journal
The Hydractinia echinata Test-System. III: Structure-Toxicity Relationship Study of Some Azo-, Azo-Anilide, and Diazonium Salt Derivatives
Previous Article in Special Issue
Combined Effects of Ultrasound and Immobilization Protocol on Butyl Acetate Synthesis Catalyzed by CALB
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 19
Issue 7
10.3390/molecules19079818
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Additives Enhancing the Catalytic Properties of Lipase from Burkholderia cepacia Immobilized on Mixed-Function-Grafted Mesoporous Silica Gel

by
Emese Abaházi
1,
Zoltán Boros
1,2 and
László Poppe
1,2,*
1
Department of Organic Chemistry and Technology, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Műegyetem rkp. 3, Budapest H-1111, Hungary
2
SynBiocat LLC., Lázár deák u. 4/1, Budapest H-1173, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2014, 19(7), 9818-9837; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules19079818
Submission received: 16 May 2014 / Revised: 23 June 2014 / Accepted: 2 July 2014 / Published: 8 July 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Enzyme Immobilization)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Effects of various additives on the lipase from Burkholderia cepacia (BcL) immobilized on mixed-function-grafted mesoporous silica gel support by hydrophobic adsorption and covalent attachment were investigated. Catalytic properties of the immobilized biocatalysts were characterized in kinetic resolution of racemic 1-phenylethanol (rac-1a) and 1-(thiophen-2-yl)ethan-1-ol (rac-1b). Screening of more than 40 additives showed significantly enhanced productivity of immobilized BcL with several additives such as PEGs, oleic acid and polyvinyl alcohol. Effects of substrate concentration and temperature between 0–100 °C on kinetic resolution of rac-1a were studied with the best adsorbed BcLs containing PEG 20 k or PVA 18–88 additives in continuous-flow packed-bed reactor. The optimum temperature of lipase activity for BcL co-immobilized with PEG 20k found at around 30 °C determined in the continuous-flow system increased remarkably to around 80 °C for BcL co-immobilized with PVA 18–88.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The interest in use of enzymes as natural chiral catalysts has increased in the past few decades [1,2,3,4]. Chirality has become a central topic in pharmaceutical industry [5,6,7], thus the application of enzymes as biocatalysts in the production of enantiopure chiral compounds turned out to be relevant on industrial scale [8]. Hydrolases, especially lipases, are the most often used biocatalysts in asymmetric biotransformations, because they can catalyze a wide range of enantio- and regioselective reactions such as hydrolysis, esterification, transesterification, aminolysis and ammoniolysis [9,10,11].
Lipases (triacylglycerol hydrolases, EC 3.1.1.3) catalyzing the hydrolysis of the triglycerides into fatty acids, mono-, and diacylglycerols, and glycerol [12] at the lipid-water interface [13,14] belong to the enzyme class of hydrolases. Because lipases are relatively thermostable and often highly selective in their reactions with a wide range of substrates, they are widely used in food, detergent and pharmaceutical industry [8,9,10].
In spite of their enormous synthetic potential, the application of enzymes as native proteins has some drawbacks. Many enzymes are relatively unstable in aqueous solutions and their recycling is difficult. For industrial applications, immobilization of enzymes proved to be crucial to enhance their activity, thermal and operational stability, and reusability [15,16,17,18]. Among the numerous methods developed for enzyme immobilization [15,16,17,18], including adsorption, covalent attachment to solid supports and entrapment within polymers, immobilization of the biocatalysts onto solid supports has become a robust, widely accepted industrial technique [19,20,21]. Physical adsorption of the desired enzyme onto suitable carriers is a convenient, one step immobilization technique, especially for lipases [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22].
The nature of the solid support in enzyme immobilization is of primary importance [20,23]. Porous silica gels [24], particularly mesoporous silica gels (MPSs) [25,26,27] turned out to be useful carriers for enzyme immobilization due to their large surface area, tunable porosity, low cytotoxicity, favorable mechanical properties and functionalizable large surface. Surface grafting of MPSs with variable functions can widen their applicability as carriers for proteins and enzymes [25,27]. Surface-functionalized silica gels, such as butyl [28] or octyl silica gels [29] proved to be suitable carriers for adsorptive immobilization of lipases [30]. Furthermore, hydrophobic silica gels were useful for differential adsorption of lipase A and lipase B from Candida antarctica [31]. Mixed-function-grafted silica supports with amine groups allowed the immobilization of enzymes by adsorption as well as by covalent immobilization [32].
Lipase catalysis is characterized by interfacial activation. When lipases are dissolved in water, their active site is covered by a lid resulting in a closed, catalytically inactive form. When lipases are in contact with an interface between water and apolar phase, the lid opens allowing access to the active site [12,13,14]. The increased hydrophobicity near the active site in the open conformation is the basis of preferential adsorption and interfacial activation of lipases during adsorption on hydrophobic surfaces [16,17,18]. Because of this conformational mobility influencing the catalytic activity, the final outcome of the biocatalytic properties of immobilized lipases can be influenced by various additives during adsorption and covalent attachment.
Molecular imprinting [33] – which is called bioimprinting when enzymes are tuned at their active site by substrates or their analogues – proved to be one of the most successful strategies for enhancing enzyme activity in organic solvents [34,35,36,37,38,39]. The active site of the lipase treated with substrate analogues, surfactants or other entities, resulted in improved lipase performance in non-aqueous medium [40,41,42,43]. Conformational changes opening the lid over the active site occur during the bioimprinting process and thus the immobilized lipase is fixed in an open conformation. When the ligand is washed away, the enzyme is trapped in this conformation because it has adopted a rigid structure due to the strong intramolecular electrostatic interactions that occur in a solvent with a low dielectric constant [44,45]. Combining molecular imprinting with protein surface coating and salt activation was reported as dual bioimprinting [42].
Biodegradable polymers such as polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) or chitosan were applied as additives in enzyme immobilizations [46]. Further ecofriendly polymers such as gum arabic and chitosan were also useful for stabilization of enzymes by microencapsulation [47]. In addition, PVAs were applied in preparation of sol-gel catalysts as lipase stabilizing additives [48,49]. The beneficial effects of further additives such as crown ethers, β-cyclodextrin derivatives, surfactants and sugars were also studied in sol-gel encapsulations [48,50,51].
The biotransformations may not only be tuned by modifying the biocatalysts but also by the reaction conditions. Effect of the temperature on selectivity is one of the major concerns in enzymatic transformations. In most of the cases – usually investigated in batch mode – stereoselectivity of enzyme catalyzed reactions was decreased with increasing temperature [52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62]. A few examples were found where enantiomer selectivity of enzyme-catalyzed kinetic resolutions (KRs) increased with increasing temperature [63,64] or had a maximum [32,65,66]. Although biotransformations in continuous-flow systems could enhance the efficiency of the hydrolase-catalyzed processes [67], there are only a few examples on the temperature effects on lipase-catalyzed KRs in continuous-flow mode so far [32,51,65,66,67,68].
Lipase from Burkholderia cepacia (BcL) was selected to study the effect of different types of additives during immobilization on surface-grafted mesoporous silica gels on enhancing the enzymatic activity and selectivity. BcL is an extracellular lipase catalyzing the biodegradation of environmental pollutants, biological control of plant diseases [69]. BcL being a relatively thermotolerant enzyme is frequently used as biocatalyst in various biotransformations performed in non-aqueous media [50,70,71,72]. In addition to study the influence of wide range of additives on the biocatalytic properties of BcL immobilized onto surface modified silica gels, the temperature effect on the immobilized BcL-catalyzed KRs in continuous-flow mode was also investigated.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Immobilization of BcL onto Mixed-Function-Grafted Mesoporous Silica Gels

In this study on immobilization of BcL onto mixed-function-grafted mesoporous silica gel by adsorption and adsorption combined with covalent binding, more than 40 additives were tested as bioimprinting agents, stabilizers or surface coating polymers. The additives in our present study were mono- (rhamnose, glucose, fructose, xylitol, xylose, sorbitol, mannitol), di- (sucrose, maltose) and polysaccharides (xylane, gum arabic, carrageenan, sodium alginate, chitosan, α- and β-cyclodextrins, starch); polyethylene glycols (tetraethylene glycol, PEG 400, PEG 1k, PEG 4k, PEG 8k, PEG 20k, PEG 1k dimethyl ether); polyvinyl alcohols (PVA 4–88, PVA 18–88, PVA 13–23–88, PVA 60–98, PVA 72–98); detergents (Brij 30, Triton X-100, Tween 80); carboxylic and fatty acids (hexanoic, octanoic, decanoic, lauric, palmitic, oleic acid); glycerol and glycerides (glycerol, trilaurin, triolein, tristearin, Hymono 9004—a mixture of unsaturated mono- and diglycerides, FAME—fatty acids methyl esters) and unnatural substrates (1-phenylethanol, 1-(thiophen-2-yl)ethan-1-ol, 2-octanol).

2.2. Effect of Additives on the Biocatalytic Properties of Adsorbed BcL

Adsorption of BcL onto mixed-function-grafted mesoporous silica gel from aqueous media was carried out in the presence of the additives listed in the Section 2.1. To evaluate the effects of the various additives on the biocatalytic properties of immobilized BcL biocatalysts, the resulted BcL preparations were investigated in the kinetic resolutions of racemic secondary alcohols 1-phenylethanol (rac-1a) and 1-(thiophen-2-yl)ethan-1-ol (rac-1b) in batch mode—in shake vials—(Table 1) and in continuous-flow bioreactors (Scheme 1).
Table
Table 1. Biocatalytic properties of BcL adsorbed onto mixed function-grafted silica supports in the kinetic resolution of rac-1a and rac-1b in batch mode.
Table 1. Biocatalytic properties of BcL adsorbed onto mixed function-grafted silica supports in the kinetic resolution of rac-1a and rac-1b in batch mode.
AdditiveKR of rac-1a aKR of rac-1b b
c
(%)		ee(R)-2a
(%)		EUb
(µmol g−1 min−1)		c
(%)		ee(R)-2b
(%)		EUb
(µmol g−1 min−1)
-2.398.1>1001.62.176.67.72.7
Brij 305.198.9>1003.54.274.37.05.5
Tween 809.999.2>2006.78.874.97.511.5
PVA 4–8826.199.5»20017.927.575.09.235.9
PVA 18–8822.599.4>20015.421.875.28.628.4
PVA 13–23–8825.899.3>20017.627.276.49.835.4
PVA 72–9814.898.9>20010.114.074.57.718.2
PEG 8k24.699.5»20016.826.774.08.734.8
PEG 20k30.099.0>20020.534.774.610.145.1
Gum arabic21.899.3>20014.819.974.68.225.8
Chitosan11.598.7>1007.99.874.97.612.8
Lauric acid13.899.3>2009.49.974.07.212.8
Oleic acid23.399.3>20015.914.873.07.319.2
Hymono 900422.599.5»20015.411.673.47.215.1
Trilaurin14.299.4>2009.75.773.46.87.5
Triolein23.599.5»20015.910.373.87.213.3
rac-1a10.899.0>2007.3----
rac-1b----5.372.16.46.8
a The conversion (c) and enantiomeric excess of ester (ee(R)-2a) was determined by chiral GC and enantiomeric ratio (E) was calculated from c and ee(R)-2a. The results of KRs with immobilized BcLs are shown only for biocatalysts with Ub > 5.0 µmol g−1 min−1; b The conversion (c) and enantiomeric excess of ester (ee(R)-2b) was determined by chiral GC and enantiomeric ratio (E) was calculated from c and ee(R)-2b. The results of KRs with immobilized BcLs are shown only for biocatalysts with Ub > 3.0 µmol g−1 min−1. Reaction conditions: Adsorption on mixed-function-grafted silica gel (20.0 mg mL−1) in a mixture of Tris buffer (14.3 mL, 100 mM, pH = 7.5 ionic strength controlled with NaCl) and 2-propanol (750 µL), additive (2.0 mg mL−1) and BcL (2.0 mg mL−1), 400 rpm, 4 °C, 24 h; KR of rac-1a: rac-1a (25.0 mg mL−1) and BcL adsorbed on mixed-function-grafted silica gel (12.5 mg mL−1) in a mixture of hexane/tert-butyl methyl ether/vinyl acetate 6/3/1 (2.0 mL), 1000 rpm, 30 °C, 4 h; KR of rac-1b: rac-1b (25.0 mg mL−1) and BcL adsorbed on mixed-function-grafted silica gel (12.5 mg mL−1) in a mixture of hexane/tert-butyl methyl ether/vinyl acetate 6/3/1 (2.0 mL), 1000 rpm, 30 °C, 2 h (see Experimental)
Molecules 19 09818 g005 550
Scheme 1. Kinetic resolutions of 1-phenylethanol (rac-1a) and 1-(thiophen-2-yl)ethan-1-ol (rac-1b) with differently immobilized BcL biocatalysts in batch and continuous-flow modes.
Scheme 1. Kinetic resolutions of 1-phenylethanol (rac-1a) and 1-(thiophen-2-yl)ethan-1-ol (rac-1b) with differently immobilized BcL biocatalysts in batch and continuous-flow modes.
Molecules 19 09818 g005
Data from KRs of racemic 1-phenylethanol (rac-1a) (Table 1) showed that several additives enhanced significantly the catalytic properties of the adsorbed BcL. While the conversion without additive was only 2.3% (Ub = 1.6 µmol g−1 min−1; E > 100 ) after 4 h of KR of rac-1a, all the additives listed in Table 1 improved the productivity of adsorbed BcL. Remarkably, the enantiomer selectivity of BcL increased in each case as well. While sugars and monosaccharides had no significant impact on activity of BcL (data not shown), the surfactant Tween 80 enhanced slightly the activity of BcL (Ub = 6.7 µmol g−1 min−1; E > 100). The natural substrates of lipases such as trilaurin and triolein resulted in a greater enhancement of activity (e.g., triolein increased the specific activity by 10-fold). The highest activity enhancements were achieved with PVAs and polyethylene glycols. Among the PVAs tested, addition of PVA 4–88 resulted in the most significant 11-fold activity enhancement (Ub = 17.9 µmol g−1 min−1; E » 200). The most active adsorbed BcL/PEG 20k biocatalyst had 13-fold higher enzyme activity in acylation of rac-1a (Ub = 20.5 µmol g−1 min−1; E > 200) than BcL adsorbed without any additives. Although racemic 1-phenylethanol rac-1a is not an ester or carboxylic acid-type substrate, the 2.5-fold activity enhancement of the rac-1a-treated BcL compared to the non-treated BcL preparation in KR of rac-1a indicated significant bioimprinting effect.
The best results of KRs of racemic 1-(thiophen-2-yl)ethan-1-ol (rac-1b) with the adsorbed BcL biocatalysts treated with the additives are shown in Table 1. The BcL adsorbed without any additive resulted in only 2.1% conversion after 2 h (Ub = 2.7 µmol g−1 min−1; E = 7.7). Similarly to the KRs of 1-phenylethanol (rac-1a), surfactants enhanced the specific enzyme activity in KRs of rac-1b by 2- and 4-fold (Ub = 5.5 and 11.5 µmol g−1 min−1; with Brij 30 and Tween 80, respectively). The natural substrates (triolein, trilaurin, oleic acid and lauric acid) as additive showed higher imprinting effects with the adsorbed BcL (2.8–7.1-fold increase of Ub). In the same way as in the KRs of rac-1a, the most active BcL biocatalysts in KRs of 1-(thiophen-2-yl)ethan-1-ol rac-1b were the ones adsorbed in the presence of PVAs and polyethylene glycols as additives (13-fold enhancement, Ub = 35.9 µmol g−1 min−1 and 17-fold activity enhancement, Ub = 45.1 µmol g−1 min−1; with PVA 4–88 and PEG 20k, respectively). Expectedly, in KR of rac-1b the rac-1b-treated BcL showed more significant bioimprinting effect (2.4-fold increase in Ub compared to the non-treated BcL preparation) than the rac-1a-treated one (less than 2-fold enhancement of Ub).

2.3. Effect of Additives on the Biocatalytic Properties of Covalently Immobilized BcL

A further goal was to combine the benefits of adsorption and covalent binding onto mixed-function-grafted silica gel with amino functions and to further improve in this way the stability of the covalently-linked BcL. It has been shown that heterofunctional supports can be advantageous for enzyme immobilization from multiple points of view [73]. Because phenyl grafting on silica gel was beneficial for hydrophobic adsorption and lipase activation [30,31] and covalent immobilization of CaLB on amino-silica resulted in better thermal stability of the enzyme than simple physical adsorption [32,74], it was assumed that adsorption on an amino-phenyl mixed-function-grafted silica gel support followed by cross-linking may provide a more stable cross-linked BcL that is also attached at the same time to the support by covalent bonds as well. Thus, a mesoporous silica gel (Dv250) grafted with (3-aminopropyl)trimethoxysilane (APTMOS) and phenyltrimethoxysilane (PTMOS) at 1:3 ratio which allowed the efficient immobilization of lipase B from Candida antarctica by adsorption and covalent cross-linking [32] was selected as carrier to perform the adsorption and covalent immobilization of BcL in the presence of seven well performing additives (PEG 4k, Tween 80, PVA 18–88, gum arabic, triolein, lauric acid and oleic acid). However, based on our recent results with glycerol diglycidyl ether (GDE) as an efficient cross-linker for preparation of cross-linked enzyme aggregates [75], GDE was applied as cross-linking agent instead of the previously used glutardialdehyde [32]. As it was already shown, GDE may be particularly useful as cross-linking agent due to its ability to form stable bonds under mild conditions not only with the amine groups of Lys but with sulfur and oxygen containing residues of Cys, Tyr, Glu or Asp as well [75]. Furthermore, GDE is an inexpensive, partially water soluble bis-epoxy compound being less toxic than glutaraldehyde (GA).
The results of GDE cross-linking after adsorption of BcL without additives were discouraging because the resulted BcL preparations exhibited almost no activity in KRs of rac-1a and rac-1b (only 0.3% and 0.5% conversions after 24 h, respectively). The results may be rationalized by taking the spatial distribution of the surface exposed Lys residues in the open conformation of BcL into account (Figure 1). The structure shown in Figure 1 clearly indicates that the majority of the surface exposed Lys residues (four out of seven) are close to the lid domains modulating the active site accessibility. Thus anchoring the enzyme by these residues may force—at least partially—the closure of the entrance to the active site leading to inactive forms of the immobilized BcL.
Fortunately, all the eight selected additives resulted in enhancement of the biocatalytic properties of the cross-linked BcL preparations (Table 2). Natural carboxylic acid substrates such as lauric acid and oleic acid applied as additives during cross-linking enhanced the biocatalytic properties of BcL (almost tenfold increase of activity). Addition of larger ester-containing additives such as triolein or Tween 80 further enhanced the conversion (c = 7.3 and 8.7%, respectively). The best results were achieved with large molecular weight polymeric additives such as PEG 20k (c = 11.8%), gum arabic (c = 13.5%) and PVA 18–88 (c = 14.0%). The beneficial effect may be rationalized by the lower hydrophobicity of the polymeric additives forcing opposite orientation at the surface of the carrier and rigidification of the enzyme in proper conformation during the cross-linking process.
Molecules 19 09818 g001 550
Figure 1. The catalytically active open conformation of BcL (PDB code: 1YS1 [76]) with a substrate analogue (in red) and the surface exposed Lys residues (in CPK color).
Figure 1. The catalytically active open conformation of BcL (PDB code: 1YS1 [76]) with a substrate analogue (in red) and the surface exposed Lys residues (in CPK color).
Molecules 19 09818 g001
Table
Table 2. Biocatalytic properties of BcL covalently attached by GDE cross-linker onto mixed-function-grafted mesoporous silica gel in the kinetic resolution of rac-1a and rac-1b in batch mode.
Table 2. Biocatalytic properties of BcL covalently attached by GDE cross-linker onto mixed-function-grafted mesoporous silica gel in the kinetic resolution of rac-1a and rac-1b in batch mode.
KR of rac-1a aKR of rac-1b b
Additivec (%)ee(R)-2a (%)Ec (%)ee(R)-2b (%)E
-0.389.818.60.570.45.8
PEG 4k1.297.994.81.371.46.1
PEG 20k11.899.5»20022.373.38.2
Tween 807.399.6»2009.471.66.5
PVA 18–8814.099.8»20026.475.29.2
Gum arabic13.599.8»20026.175.59.3
Lauric acid4.099.4>2008.574.77.4
Oleic acid3.499.4>2009.974.87.5
Triolein8.799.7»20013.073.37.2
a The conversion (c) and enantiomeric excess of ester (ee(R)-2a) was determined by chiral GC and enantiomeric ratio (E) was calculated from c and ee(R)-2a. b The conversion (c) and enantiomeric excess of ester (ee(R)-2b) was determined by chiral GC and enantiomeric ratio (E) was calculated from c and ee(R)-2b. Reaction conditions: Cross-linking: GDE (20 µL mL−1), additive (1.9 mg mL−1) and BcL adsorbed on mixed-function-grafted silica gel (12.5 mg mL−1) in a mixture of phosphate buffer (4 mL, 20 mM, pH = 7.2) and ethanol (12 mL), 400 rpm, 25 °C, 24 h; KR of rac-1a: rac-1a (25.0 mg mL−1) and BcL adsorbed on mixed-function-grafted silica gel (12.5 mg mL−1) in a mixture of hexane/tert-butyl methyl ether/vinyl acetate 6/3/1 (2.0 mL), 1000 rpm, 30 °C, 24 h; KR of rac-1b: rac-1b (25.0 mg mL−1) and BcL adsorbed on mixed-function-grafted silica gel (12.5 mg mL−1) in a mixture of hexane/tert-butyl methyl ether/vinyl acetate 6/3/1 (2.0 mL), 1000 rpm, 30 °C, 24 h (see Experimental).
The biocatalytic properties of the BcL preparations cross-linked in the presence of the eight selected additives were also tested in the KR of rac-1b (Table 2). Similarly to the KR tests with rac-1a, all the eight covalently bound BcL biocatalyst prepared in the presence of additives showed enhanced biocatalytic features in the KRs with rac-1b as well. PEG 4k resulted in 2.6-fold increase in conversion, the bioimprinting additives caused even larger effect (17- to 26-fold increase of the conversion with lauric acid, Tween 80, oleic acid and triolein). The most significantly enhanced conversions in the KRs with rac-1b with covalently immobilized BcL were found by using the large molecular weight polymeric additives PEG 20k, gum arabic and PVA 18–88 (45- to 53-fold increase).
Although use of proper additives during the cross-linking of the adsorbed BcL enhanced the biocatalytic properties of the covalently immobilized BcL, the specific activity (Ub) of the adsorbed and cross-linked BcL preparations remained only 5%–15% that of the adsorbed BcL biocatalysts. Due to the simplicity of the adsorption process and to the tenfold higher specific activity of the adsorbed BcL, only the adsorbed lipase biocatalysts were investigated further.

2.4. Thermal Stability of BcLs Adsorbed onto Mixed-Function-Grafted Mesoporous Silica Gel

Five immobilized BcLs adsorbed onto mixed-function-grafted mesoporous silica gel in the presence of additives with the highest Ub with rac-1a (see Table 1) were selected for the further study on thermal stability of the adsorbed BcLs. During the thermostability tests, the BcL samples adsorbed in the presence of the five selected additives were incubated in toluene at various temperatures (30, 50, 70, 90 and 110 °C) for 1 h and were tested in KR of rac-1a after cooling to 30 °C. Figure 2 shows the specific activity of the five selected BcLs at given temperatures in the KRs after 2 h.
Molecules 19 09818 g002 550
Figure 2. Thermal stability of adsorbed BcL preparations in kinetic resolution of rac-1a.
Figure 2. Thermal stability of adsorbed BcL preparations in kinetic resolution of rac-1a.
Molecules 19 09818 g002
Reaction conditions: Thermal treatment: BcL adsorbed on mixed-function-grafted silica gel (25 mg) in toluene (1 mL), 1 h at the indicated temperature; KR test with rac-1a: rac-1a (25.0 mg mL−1) and BcL adsorbed on mixed-function-grafted silica gel (12.5 mg mL−1) in a mixture of hexane/tert-butyl methyl ether/vinyl acetate 6/3/1 (2.0 mL), 1000 rpm, 30 °C, 2 h (see Experimental).
According to the KR tests with rac-1a at 30 °C, the most active adsorbed BcL preparation was the one obtained with PEG 20k as additive (Ub = 18.7 µmol g−1 min−1). The BcL/PEG 20k form, however, proved to be the least thermostable (retained only 18% of the initial activity after incubating at 70 °C for 1 h). When tested at 30 °C, the second most active form of adsorbed BcL was the one prepared with PVA 18–88 as additive (Ub = 14.0 µmol g−1 min−1). The BcL / PVA 18–88 form turned out to be one of the most thermostable preparations (87% of the initial activity was retained after incubating at 70 °C). While the high molecular weight PVA 18–88 (130 kDa, 88% hydrolyzed) or PVA 4–88 (31 kDa, 88% hydrolyzed) as additive had almost the same relative stabilizing effect for BcL up to 70 °C, the less molecular weight PVA 13–23–88 (13–23 kDa, 88% hydrolyzed) resulted in lower degree of thermal stabilization (only up to 50 °C). Oleic acid as natural substrate for BcL showed even less thermal stabilization. The most thermostable forms of BcL with PVA 4–88 and PVA 18–88 retained 44 and 49% of their initial activity after 1 h incubation at 90 °C but all BcL forms lost their activity after incubating at 110 °C. The thermal behavior of adsorbed BcL with PEG 20k can be rationalized by assuming that enhanced thermostability is related to embedding the lipase molecule within a thin film of the high molecular weight additive which is diminished when PEG 20k melts (Mp ~ 60 °C).
Considering also the fact that the more hydrophilic, almost fully (98%) hydrolyzed PVAs were much less active (Ub = 10.1 µmol g−1 min−1 with PVA 72–98: 72 kDa; and Ub < 5 µmol g−1 min−1 with PVA 60–98: 60 kDa; see Table 1) than PVAs with 88% hydrolysis (Ub = 15.4–17.9 µmol g−1 min−1 with PVA 18–88: 130 kDa, PVA 4–88: 31 kDa and PVA 13–23–88: 13–23 kDa; see Table 1), it can be assumed that partial hydrophobicity of less hydrolyzed PVAs forming a thin film embedding the lipase molecules contributed to the activation of BcL.

2.5. Recyclability of Adsorbed BcL Biocatalysts

For practical applications of immobilized lipases, reusability is of foremost importance. For testing the operational stability and recycling of the BcLs adsorbed onto mixed-function-grafted mesoporous silica gel with additives, the five adsorbed BcL biocatalysts with the highest specific biocatalyst activity (Ub) in KR of rac-1a were compared by repeated KRs of rac-1a as recycling test. Each biocatalyst was reused seven times and their Ub (initial values are listed in Table 1) was recorded after recovery. Figure 3 shows the retained relative specific activities of adsorbed BcL biocatalysts related to their initial specific biocatalyst activity as 100%.
Recycling of the adsorbed BcL biocatalysts in eight cycles of KR of rac-1a indicated different effect of the additives on the operational stability of the adsorbed BcL in organic solvent. Four out of the investigated five additives (oleic acid and three PVAs) resulted in quite stable adsorbed BcL biocatalysts retaining their initial specific biocatalyst activity even after eight runs. In contrast, the BcL biocatalyst adsorbed in the presence of PEG 20k lost gradually its activity and retained only 49% of its initial Ub after eight runs. The apparent increase of the initial Ub which may be rationalized by equilibration/partial loss of water content of the enzyme during repeated runs is noteworthy. Due to the good mechanical properties of carrier, the mass loss of biocatalysts was below 5% in each cycle.
Molecules 19 09818 g003 550
Figure 3. Recycling of the adsorbed BcL from repeated kinetic resolutions of rac-1a.
Figure 3. Recycling of the adsorbed BcL from repeated kinetic resolutions of rac-1a.
Molecules 19 09818 g003
Reaction conditions for one cycle: rac-1a (25.0 mg mL−1) and BcL adsorbed on mixed-function-grafted silica gel (12.5 mg mL−1) in a mixture of hexane/tert-butyl methyl ether/vinyl acetate 6/3/1 (2.0 mL), 1000 rpm, 30 °C, 1 h; then washing by hexane (2 × 10 mL). For GC after each cycles, see Experimental.

2.6. Continuous-Flow Kinetic Resolutions of rac-1a with BcLs Adsorbed with PVA 18-88 and PEG 20k

Retention of biocatalysts by immobilization—in particular for enzymes [15,16,17,18,19,20,21], especially for lipases [22]—contributed significantly to the development of continuous-flow biotransformations [8,19,67]. When a biotransformation is performed in a continuous-flow packed-bed bioreactor, no separate process is required for enzyme recovery because the immobilized biocatalyst is continuously retained. Moreover, packed-bed flow reactors with immobilized catalyst have a clear advantage in that voidage is low: 34% compared to over 80%–90% being typical for a stirred tank reactor [77].
Because temperature [65] or the mode of lipase immobilization [32,66] had significant impact on lipase-catalyzed KR processes in continuous-flow reactors, two well-working adsorbed BcL biocatalysts (with PVA 18–88 and PEG 20k as additives) were selected to study the effect of substrate concentration and temperature on KR of rac-1a in continuous-flow packed-bed bioreactors (Figure 4).
First, productivity of the two BcL biocatalysts (rflow, µmol g−1 min−1) was investigated as a function of substrate concentration (c(R)-1a, mg mL−1). Because the quasi-linear range of rflow as a function of c(R)-1a ended at 5 mg mL−1 (0.041 mmol mL−1, Figure 4A), the further temperature effect studies in the range of 0 °C–100 °C were performed at this substrate concentration (Figure 4B,C).
Next, temperature effects on productivity (rflow, Figure 4B) and selectivity (E, Figure 4C) of two BcL biocatalysts in continuous-flow KR of rac-1a were investigated between 0 °C–100 °C. In accordance with the thermal stability tests in batch mode, productivity—temperature profiles of the adsorbed BcL with PEG 20k and PVA 18–88 were quite dissimilar (Figure 4B). BcL with PEG 20k was thermostable only up to 30 °C and started to lose its activity over 40 °C. On the other hand, BcL with PVA 18–88 was thermostable up to 80 °C and deactivated only at higher temperatures.
Investigation of the temperature-dependency of enantiomer selectivity with the two BcL biocatalysts in continuous-flow KR of rac-1a revealed similar trends as published previously for lipase-catalyzed KRs of secondary alcohols and amines in continuous-flow bioreactors [32,65,66]. With both forms of adsorbed BcL maxima of E at certain temperature were found (Figure 4C). BcL with PEG 20k resulted in higher enantiomer selectivity in the lower temperature range (0 °C–50 °C) with a maximum at around 20 °C but selectivity decreased drastically over the breakdown temperature of this form (~30 °C). Enantiomer selectivity of BcL with PVA 18–88 had a maximum at higher temperature (~30 °C) with monotonic decrease up to 100 °C.
It was demonstrated already that operational stability of immobilized lipases in continuous-flow kinetic resolutions below the optimum temperature are quite high and stationary reaction conditions could be maintained even for one week period [51,68]. Because the main goal of this study was to demonstrate the differences between the additives and not to produce large quantities of the already known products [(R)-2a and (S)-1a], no further attempts were made for their preparative production.
Molecules 19 09818 g004 550
Figure 4. Kinetic resolutions of racemic 1-phenylethanol (rac-1a) in continuous-flow packed-bed bioreactor. Effect of the substrate concentration on specific reaction rate, rflow (A); temperature on specific reaction rate, rflow (B) and temperature on enantiomeric ratio, E (C).
Figure 4. Kinetic resolutions of racemic 1-phenylethanol (rac-1a) in continuous-flow packed-bed bioreactor. Effect of the substrate concentration on specific reaction rate, rflow (A); temperature on specific reaction rate, rflow (B) and temperature on enantiomeric ratio, E (C).
Molecules 19 09818 g004
Reaction conditions: (A) rac-1a at different concentrations (0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10, 25, 50 mg mL−1) in 6/3/1 mixture of hexane/tert-butyl methyl ether/vinyl acetate, at 30 °C, flow rate: 0.2 mL min−1; (B and C) rac-1a (5.0 mg mL−1) in 6/3/1 mixture of hexane/tert-butyl methyl ether/vinyl acetate, at the indicated temperature in the 0 °C–100 °C range, flow rate: 0.2 mL min−1. For GC analyses of samples at various states, see Experimental.
The remarkably different behavior of the two BcL biocatalysts with PEG 20k and PVA 18–88 as additives in continuous-flow KR can be rationalized by assuming different solubility of the two additives. In case of PEG 20k, the additive has good solubility in the solvent (6/3/1 mixture of hexane/tert-butyl methyl ether/vinyl acetate) and thus dissolved out from the biocatalyst resulting in rapid loss of its positive effects. The PVA 18–88 additive in the other BcL biocatalyst, however, seemed to be resistant to removal up to 80 °C. These assumptions can rationalize the enormous, about 50 °C difference in the optimum temperature of lipase activity for BcL co-immobilized with PEG 20k and PVA 18–88. These results indicate also the importance of embedding the enzyme molecules in a thin and permeable matrix of suitable properties for activation and stabilization in their immobilized form.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Analytical Methods

GC analyses were carried out on Agilent 4890 instrument equipped with FID detector using H2 carrier gas (injector: 250 °C, FID: 250 °C, head pressure: 12 psi, split ratio: 50:1) on a Hydrodex β-6TBDM column (25 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm film with heptakis-(2,3-di-O-methyl-6-O-t-butyldimethylsilyl)-β-cyclodextrine; Macherey & Nagel, Düren, Germany). tr (min): for 1a and 2a (oven: 120 °C, 8 min), 3.77 [(S)-2a], 4.08 [(R)-2a], 5.27 [(R)-1a], 5.55 [(S)-1a]; for 1b and 2b (oven: 100 °C–160 °C 10 °C/min), 3.87 [(R)-1b], 4.06 [(S)-1b], 4.61 [(S)-2b], 4.77 [(R)-2b]. Conversion (c), enantiomeric excess (ee) and enantiomeric ratio (E) were determined by GC measurements with base-line separations of the enantiomers of 1a and 2a, and 1b and 2b using precise integration methods. Enantiomeric ratio (E) was calculated from c and enantiomeric excess of the product (eeP) using the equation E = ln[1 − c(1 + eeP)]/ln[1 − c(1 − eeP)] [78]. Due to sensitivity to experimental errors, E values calculated in the 100-200 range are given as > 100, in the 200–500 range as > 200 and above 500 as » 200. To characterize the productivity of the biocatalysts, specific reaction rates (or specific biocatalyst activity) in batch reactions (Ub) were calculated using the equation Ub = nP/(t × mB) (where nP [μmol] is the amount of the product, t [h] is the reaction time and mB [g] is the mass of the applied biocatalyst) [65]. Specific reaction rates in continuous-flow systems (rflow) were calculated using the equation rflow = [P] × v/mB (where [P] [μmol/mL] is the molar concentration of the product, v [mL/h] is the flow rate and mB [g] is the mass of the applied biocatalyst) [65]. Because the rate of product formation is not a linear function of conversion (c), rigorous comparisons between the productivity of a continuous-flow reaction and its batch mode counterpart using their Ub and rflow values can only be made at comparable degrees of conversions [65].

3.2. Materials

Lipase from Burkholderia cepacia (BcL), phenyltrimethoxysilane (PTMOS) and (3-aminopropyl)trimethoxysilane were purchased from Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI, USA). PEG 400, PEG 1k, PEG 4k, PEG 8k, PEG 20k, gum arabic, alginic acid sodium salt from brown algae, α-cyclodextrin, β-cyclodextrin, lauric acid, decanoic acid, trilaurin, tristearin, chitosan, 1-phenylethanol were purchased from Fluka (Milwaukee, WI, USA). NaH2PO4 and Na2HPO4 were of analytical grade, purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Hydrochloric acid (analytical grade), Brij 30, Triton X-100, PVA 4–88 (31 kDa), PVA 18–88 (130 kDa), PVA 13–23–88 (13–23 kDa), PVA 60–98 (60 kDa), PVA 72–98 (72 kDa), xylan, Tween 80, carrageenan, starch, hexanoic acid, triolein, Hymono 9004, 2-octanol, rhamnose, glucose, fructose, xylitol, xylose, sorbitol, mannitol, sucrose, maltose were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The mesoporous silica gel with mixed grafting [(3-aminopropyl)trimethoxysilane (ApTMOS) and phenyltrimethoxysilane (PTMOS) in mole ratio of 1:3] was the product of SynBiocat (Budapest, Hungary) [32].

3.3. BcL Immobilization by Adsorption on Mesoporous Silica gel with Mixed Grafting

To a solution of BcL (30.0 mg) in Tris buffer (14.3 mL, 100 mM, pH = 7.5, ionic strength controlled with NaCl) were added surface functionalized silica gel (300.0 mg), additive (30.0 mg) and 2-propanol (750 µL) as co-solvent. The mixture was shaken at 400 rpm at 4 °C for 24 h. The adsorbed BcL biocatalyst was filtered off on a glass filter (G4), washed with distilled water (10 mL), phosphate buffer (10 mL, 20 mM, pH = 7.2), 2-propanol (2 × 10 mL), hexane (10 mL), dried at room temperature (2 h) and stored at 4 °C. All immobilization were carried out in triplicates. Standard deviations of immobilized biocatalyst masses were below 5%.

3.4. BcL Immobilization by Adsorption Followed by Cross-Linking on Mesoporous Silica Gel with Mixed Grafting

To a solution of additive (30.0 mg) in phosphate buffer (4 mL, 20 mM, pH = 7.2) and ethanol (12 mL) was added the previously adsorbed BcL preparation (200.0 mg) and glycerol diglycidyl ether (320.0 µL). The mixture was incubated at 400 rpm at 25 °C for 24 h. The adsorbed and cross-linked BcL biocatalyst was filtered off on a glass filter (G4), washed with ethanol (3 × 10 mL), distilled water (10 mL), ethanol (3 × 10 mL), dried at room temperature (2 h) and stored at 4 °C. All immobilization were carried out in triplicates. Standard deviations of immobilized biocatalyst masses were below 5%.

3.5. Enantiomer Selective Acetylation of Racemic 1-Phenylethanol rac-1a and 1-(Thiophen-2-yl)ethan-1-ol rac-1b

Immobilized BcL biocatalyst (25.0 mg; adsorbed, or adsorbed and cross-linked; with additive) was added to a solution of the racemic alcohol (rac-1a: 50.0 mg; 0.409 mmol; rac-1b: 50.0 mg; 0.390 mmol) in hexane/tert-butyl methyl ether/vinyl acetate 6/3/1 (2.0 mL) in glass vial and the resulting mixture was shaken (1,000 rpm) at 30 °C for 4 h (adsorbed BcLs) or 24 h (adsorbed and cross-linked BcLs). The reactions were analyzed by GC after 1, 2, 4 and 24 h as described in Section 3.1. All test reactions were performed in triplicates. Standard deviations of conversion were below 9%, standard deviations of enantiomeric excess were below 0.4%.

3.6. Thermal Stability of Immobilized BcL Biocatalysts

Immobilized BcL biocatalyst (25.0 mg; adsorbed, with additive) and toluene (1.0 mL) were added to 4 mL glass vial. The sample was incubated for 1 h at the given temperature (30, 50, 70, 90 or 110 °C). After cooling to room temperature, the samples were tested in KR of rac-1a as described in Section 3.1.

3.7. Recycling the Immobilized BcL Biocatalysts

Immobilized BcL biocatalyst (25.0 mg; adsorbed, with additive) was added to a solution of racemic 1-phenylethanol (rac-1a, 50.0 mg; 0.409 mmol) in hexane/tert-butyl methyl ether/vinyl acetate 6/3/1 (1.0 mL) in an Eppendorf tube and the resulted mixture was shaken at 1,000 rpm for 1 h at 30 °C. After 1 h, the reaction mixture was centrifuged, the immobilized BcL biocatalyst was washed twice with hexane (2 × 1.0 mL), then fresh solution of rac-1a (50.0 mg; 0.409 mmol) in hexane/tert-butyl methyl ether/vinyl acetate 6/3/1 (1.0 mL) was added to it and the sample was shaken again (1,000 rpm) at 30 °C for 1 h. In this way, the immobilized BcL biocatalyst were tested in 8 cycles.

3.8. Kinetic Resolution of 1-Phenylethanol rac-1a in Adsorbed BcL-Filled Continuous-Flow Bioreactor

The continuous-flow KRs of rac-1a were performed in a laboratory flow reactor comprising an isocratic HPLC pump (K-120, Knauer, Berlin, Germany) attached to CatCart™ columns (stainless steel, inner diameter: 4 mm; total length: 70 mm; packed length: 65 mm; inner volume: 0.816 mL) filled with the immobilized BcL biocatalysts in an in–house made thermostated aluminum metal block column holder with precise temperature control. Before use, the BcL-filled columns were washed with a 2:1 mixture of hexane and tert-butyl methyl ether (0.5 mL min−1, 20 min).
The adsorbed BcL biocatalysts (on mesoporous silica gel with mixed grafting in the presence of PVA 18–88 or PEG 20k) were packed into stainless steel CatCart™ columns according to the filling process of ThalesNano (Budapest, Hungary). Before packing, the BcL biocatalyst-filled columns were washed with distilled water, ethanol, n-hexane and acetone in an ultrasonic cleaner. For the continuous-flow enzymatic applications, the columns were sealed by silver metal filter membranes [Sterlitech Silver Membrane Filter from Sigma–Aldrich, Z623237, pore size 0.45 μm; pure metallic silver, 99.97% with no extractable or detectable contaminants] due to the known benefits of Ag (bacteriostatic). The sealings were made of PTFE. Two CatCart™ columns per enzyme were packed for this study (filling weights: BcL with PVA 18–88, 237.1 mg and 237.7 mg; BcL with PEG 20k, 233.6 mg and 245.9 mg).
To study the effect of the substrate concentration, solutions with racemic 1-phenylethanol (rac-1a) at different concentrations (0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10, 25, 50 mg mL−1) in 6/3/1 mixture of hexane/tert-butyl methyl ether/vinyl acetate were pumped through the adsorbed BcL biocatalyst-filled columns (adsorbed BcL with PVA 18–88 or PEG 20k) thermostated to 30 °C at a flow rate of 0.2 mL min−1. At each concentration, samples were analyzed by GC every 10 min up to 40 min after the beginning of the experiment. Samples were collected during stationary operation (30 min after changing the parameters), diluted with EtOH to 2 mg mL−1 and analyzed as described in Section 3.1.
To study the effect of the temperature, a solution of racemic 1-phenylethanol (rac-1a, 5.0 mg mL−1) in 6/3/1 mixture of hexane/tert-butyl methyl ether/vinyl acetate was pumped through the adsorbed BcL biocatalyst-filled columns (adsorbed BcL with PVA 18–88 or PEG 20k) thermostated to various temperatures (0 °C–100 °C) at a flow rate of 0.2 mL min−1. Samples were collected during stationary operation (30 min after changing the parameters) and analyzed as described above. The experiments were performed at 10 °C steps in the temperature range between of 0 °C–100 °C.
After performing the various tests, the adsorbed BcL biocatalyst-filled columns were washed with a 2:1 mixture of hexane and tert-butyl methyl ether (0.5 mL min−1, 20 min) and stored at 4 °C.

4. Conclusions

Catalytic properties and stability of lipase from Burkholderia cepacia could be tuned effectively with additives in immobilization on mixed-function-grafted silica gel support by hydrophobic adsorption and covalent attachment.
Tests with the immobilized BcLs using kinetic resolution of rac-1a and rac-1b revealed BcL adsorbed in the presence of high molecular weight polymeric additives was significantly more active than adsorbed BcL without additive. The highest specific enzyme activity with PEG 20k as additive and with PVAs can be rationalized by assuming a thin film of the polymeric additive embedding the BcL molecules. Most of the investigated additives had a positive impact on covalent immobilization of BcL with cross-linking by glycerol diglycidyl ether after adsorption and resulted immobilized BcLs with moderate activity. Cross-linking without additives was fatal to BcL activity. Even the additive-protected cross-linked BcLs exhibited only about tenfold lower activity than their non-cross-linked counterparts.
Due to the good mechanical properties of the carrier, most of the adsorbed BcLs were well recyclable from their reactions in organic media and maintained their catalytic activity up to 8 runs. Thermal stability of BcLs adsorbed with PEG 20k and PVA 18–88 in batch and in continuous-flow systems were remarkably different. Adsorbed BcL with PEG 20k lost its activity above 40 °C, however BcL with PVA 18–88 remained stable up to 80 °C with a selectivity maximum at approximately 30 °C. The remarkable 50 °C shift of optimum temperature of lipase activity for BcL co-immobilized with PEG 20k (at around 30 °C) and BcL co-immobilized with PVA 18–88 (at around 80 °C) clearly indicate the potential of “immobilization engineering” for tuning the properties of immobilized enzymes.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the New Széchényi Development Plan (“Development of quality-oriented and harmonized R+D+I strategy and functional model at BME” project; TÁMOP-4.2.1/B-09/1/KMR-2010-0002) and by Gedeon Richter pharmaceutical company.

Author Contributions

Emese Abaházi carried out all the experiments. Emese Abaházi and Zoltán Boros contributed to the designing of the experiments. Emese Abaházi, Zoltán Boros and László Poppe wrote the paper. László Poppe helped in interpretation of data and discussion of results. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Poppe, L.; Novák, L. Selective Biocatalysis: A Synthetic Approach; VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  2. Biotechnology: Biotransformations I and II, 2nd ed.; Rehm, H.J.; Reed, G.; Pühler, A.; Stadler, P.; Kelly, D.R. (Eds.) Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, GE, Germany, 1998; Volume 8a and Volume 8b.
  3. Faber, K. Biotransformations in Organic Chemistry, 6th ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  4. Okahata, Y.; Hatano, A.; Ijiro, K. Enhancing enantioselectivity of a lipid-coated lipase via imprinting methods for esterification in organic solvents. Tetrahedron-Asymmetry 1995, 6, 1311–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ariens, E.J. Stereochemistry: A basis for sophisticated nonsense in pharmacokinetics and clinical pharmacology. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1984, 26, 663–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Brooks, W.H.; Guida, W.C.; Daniel, K.G. The significance of chirality in drug design and development. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2011, 11, 760–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Blaser, H.I. Chirality and its implications for the pharmaceutical industry. Rendiconti Lincei 2013, 24, 213–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Industrial Biotransformations, 2nd ed.; Liese, A.; Seelbach, K.; Wandrey, C. (Eds.) Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2006.
  9. Schmid, R.D.; Verger, R. Lipases–interfacial enzymes with attractive applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1608–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bornscheuer, U.T.; Kazlauskas, R.J. Hydrolases in Organic Synthesis, Regio- and Stereoselective Biotransformations, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bornscheuer, U.T.; Kazlauskas, R.J. Catalytic Promiscuity in Biocatalysis: Using Old Enzymes to Form New Bonds and Follow New Pathways. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6032–6040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lipases; Borgström, B.; Brockmann, H.L. (Eds.) Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1984.
  13. Desnuelle, P. The Lipases. In The Enzymes, 3rd ed.; Boyer, P.D., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1972; Volume 7, pp. 575–616. [Google Scholar]
  14. Verger, R.; Mieras, M.C.F.; de Haas, G.H. Action of phospholipase A at interfaces. J. Biol. Chem. 1973, 248, 4023–4034. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sheldon, R.A. Enzyme immobilization: The Quest for optimum performance. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 1289–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mateo, C.; Palomo, J.M.; Fernandez-Lorente, G.; Guisan, J.M.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Improvement of enzyme activity, stability and selectivity via immobilization techniques. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2007, 40, 1451–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sheldon, R.A.; van Pelt, S. Enzyme immobilisation in biocatalysis: Why, what and how. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 6223–6235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rodrigues, R.C.; Ortiz, C.; Berenguer-Murcia, A.; Torres, R.; Fernández-Lafuente, R. Modifying enzyme activity and selectivity by immobilization. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 6290–6307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Immobilized Enzymes for Industrial Reactors; Messing, R.A. (Ed.) Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1975.
  20. Cao, L. Carrier-bound Immobilized Enzymes: Principles, Application and Design; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  21. Immobilization of Enzymes and Cells, 2nd ed.; Guisan, J.M. (Ed.) Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2006.
  22. Adlercreutz, P. Immobilisation and application of lipases in organic media. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 6406–6436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hanefeld, U.; Gardossi, L.; Magner, E. Understanding enzyme immobilisation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 453–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lee, C.H.; Lin, T.S.; Moua, C.Y. Mesoporous materials for encapsulating enzymes. Nano Today 2009, 4, 165–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Galarneau, A.; Mureseanu, M.; Atger, S.; Renard, G.; Fajula, F. Immobilization of lipase on silicas. Relevance of textural and interfacial properties on activity and selectivity. New J. Chem. 2006, 30, 562–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hudson, S.; Cooney, J.; Magner, E. Proteins in Mesoporous Silicates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8582–8594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Popat, A.; Hartono, S.B.; Stahr, F.; Liu, J.; Qiao, S.Z.; Lu, G.Q. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for bioadsorption, enzyme immobilisation, and delivery carriers. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 2801–2818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dragoi, B.; Dumitriu, E. Candida antarctica lipase B immobilization onto hybrid organic-inorganic mesoporous materials. Acta Chim. Slov. 2008, 55, 277–285. [Google Scholar]
  29. Blanco, R. M.; Terreros, P.; Fernández-Pérez, M.; Otero, C.; Díaz-González, G. Functionalization of mesoporous silica for lipase immobilization: Characterization of the support and the catalysts. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2004, 30, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nagy-Győr, L.; Boros, Z.; Poppe, L. Immobilization of lipases from Rhizomucor miehei and Thermomyces lanuginosus by adsorption on variously grafted silica gels. Per. Polytechn. Chem. Eng. 2013, 57, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  31. Boros, Z.; Abaháziová, E.; Oláh, M.; Sátorhelyi, P.; Erdélyi, B.; Poppe, L. Novel hydrophobic silica gels as carriers for lipases – separation of lipase A and lipase B from Candida antarctica. Chim. Oggi/Chem. Today 2012, 30, 28–31. [Google Scholar]
  32. Boros, Z.; Weiser, D.; Márkus, M.; Abaháziová, E.; Magyar, Á.; Tomin, A.; Koczka, B.; Kovács, P.; Poppe, L. Hydrophobic adsorption and covalent immobilization of Candida antarctica lipase B on mixed-function-grafted silica gel supports for continuous-flow biotransformations. Proc. Biochem. 2013, 48, 1039–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Molecularly Imprinted Materials: Science and Technology; Yan, M.; Ramström, O. (Eds.) Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 2005.
  34. Mingarro, I.; Abad, C.; Braco, L. Interfacial activation-based molecular bioimprinting of lipolytic enzymes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 3308–3312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. González-Navarro, H.; Brace, L. Improving lipase activity in solvent-free media by interfacial activation-based molecular bioimprinting. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 1997, 3, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Furukawa, S.; Ono, T.; Ijima, H.; Kawakam, K. Effect of imprinting sol–gel immobilized lipase with chiral template substrates in esterification of (R)-(+)- and (S)-(−)-glycidol. J. Mol. Catal. B-Enzym. 2002, 17, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yilmaz, E. Combining the bioimprinting technique with lipase immobilization for interesterification. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 18, 621–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Foresti, M.L.; Alimenti, G.A.; Ferreira, M.L. Interfacial activation and bioimprinting of Candida rugosa lipase immobilized on polypropylene: Effzect on the enzymatic activity in solvent-free ethyl oleate synthesis. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2005, 36, 338–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kahveci, D.; Xu, X. Enhancement of activity and selectivity of Candida rugosa lipase and Candida antarctica lipase A by bioimprinting and/or immobilization for application in the selective ethanolysis of fish oil. Biotechnol. Lett. 2011, 33, 2065–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yan, J.; Li, L.; Tang, Q.; Jiang, M. Preparation of a crosslinked bioimprinted lipase for enrichment of polyunsaturated fatty acids from fish processing waste. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010, 162, 757–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kronenburg, N.A.E.; de Bont, J.A.M.; Fischer, L. Improvement of enantioselectivity by immobilized imprinting of epoxide hydrolase from Rhodotorula glutinis. J. Mol. Catal. B-Enzym. 2001, 16, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yan, J.-Y.; Yan, Y.-J.; Yang, J.-K.; Xu, L.; Liu, Y. Combined strategy for preparation of a bioimprinted Geotrichum sp. lipase biocatalyst effective in non-aqueous media. Proc. Biochem. 2009, 44, 1128–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kahveci, D.; Xu, X. Bioimprinted Immobilization of Candida antarctica Lipase A for Concentration of Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2012, 89, 1839–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yan, Y.; Zhang, X.; Chen, D. Enhanced catalysis of Yarrowia lipolytica lipase LIP2 immobilized on macroporous resin and its application in enrichment of polyunsaturated fatty acids. Biores. Technol. 2013, 131, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fishman, A.; Cogan, U. Bio-imprinting of lipases with fatty acids. J. Mol. Catal. B-Enzym. 2003, 22, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Badjugar, K.C.; Dhake, K.P.; Bhanage, B.M. Immobilization of Candida cylindracea lipase on polylactic acid, polyvinyl alcohol and chitosan based ternary blend film: Characterization, activity, stability and its application for N-acylation reactions. Proc. Biochem. 2013, 48, 1335–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Amid, M.; Manap, Y.; Zohdi, N. Microencapsulation of purified Amylase enzyme from Pitaya (Hylocereus polyrhizus) peel in Arabic Gum-Chitosan using freeze drying. Molecules 2014, 19, 3731–3743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Reetz, M.T.; Tielmann, P.; Wiesenhöfer, W.; Könen, W.; Zonta, A. A second generation sol–gel encapsulated lipases: Robust heterogenous biocatalysts. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 717–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Reetz, M.T. Review of enzymes entrapment in hydrophobic silicates. Adv. Mater. 1997, 9, 943–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cao, X.; Yang, J.; Shu, L.; Yu, B.; Yan, Y. Improving esterification activity of Burkholderia cepacia lipase encapsulated in silica by bioimprinting with substrate analogues. Proc. Biochem. 2009, 44, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hellner, G.; Boros, Z.; Tomin, A.; Poppe, L. Novel Sol-Gel lipases by designed bioimprinting for continuous-flow kinetic resolutions. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 2481–2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lam, L.K.P.; Hui, R.A.; Jones, J.B. Enzymes in organic synthesis. 35. Stereoselective pig liver esterase catalyzed hydrolyses of 3-substituted glutarate diesters. Optimization of enantiomeric excess via reaction conditions control. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 2047–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rantakylä, M.; Aaltonen, O. Enantioselective esterification of ibuprofen in supercritical carbon dioxide by immobilized lipase. Biotechnol. Lett. 1994, 16, 825–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Molinari, F.; Mantegazza, L.; Villa, R.; Aragozzini, F. Resolution of 2-Alkanols by Microbially-Catalyzed Esterification. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1998, 86, 62–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ljubović, E.; Majerić-Elenkov, M.; Avgadić, A.; Šunjić, V. Novel biocatalytic methodology: Low temperature enhanced enantioselectivity of enzyme catalyzed reactions in organic solvents. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 1999, 37, 215–224. [Google Scholar]
  56. López-Serrano, P.; Wegman, M.A.; van Rantwijk, F.; Sheldon, R.A. Enantioselective enzyme catalysed ammoniolysis of amino acid derivatives. Effect of temperature. Tetrahedron-Asymmetry 2001, 12, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cainelli, G.; Galletti, P.; Giacomini, D.; Gualandi, A.; Quintavalla, A. Chemo- and enzyme-catalyzed reactions revealing a common temperature-dependent dynamic solvent effect on enantioselectivity. Helv. Chim. Acta 2003, 86, 3548–3559. [Google Scholar]
  58. Moon-Young, Y.; Lee, S.H.; Cheong, C.S.; Park, J.K. Resolution of 1,3-dioxolane derivatives using the lipase from an Acinetobacter junii SY-01. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2004, 35, 574–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sakai, T. ‘Low-temperature method’ for a dramatic improvement in enantioselectivity in lipase-catalyzed reactions. Tetrahedron-Asymmetry 2004, 15, 2749–2756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chen, C.C.; Tsai, S.W. Carica papaya lipase: A novel biocatalyst for the enantioselective hydrolysis of (R,S)-naproxen 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl ester. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2005, 36, 127–132. [Google Scholar]
  61. Lin, C.; Hiraga, Y.; Masaki, K.; Iefuji, H.; Ohkata, K. Temperature-dependence of enantioselectivity and desymmetrization in the acetylation of 2-mono- and 2,2-di-substituted 1,3-propanediols by a novel lipase isolated from the yeast Cryptococcus spp. S-2. Biocatal. Biotransform. 2006, 24, 390–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yang, G.; Wu, J.; Xu, G.; Yang, L. Enantioselective resolution of 2-(1-hydroxy-3-butenyl)-5-methylfuran by immobilized lipase. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 81, 847–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Cipiciani, A.; Bellezza, F.; Fringuelli, F.; Silvestrini, M.G. Influence of pH and temperature on the enantioselectivity of propan-2-ol-treated Candida rugosa lipase in the kinetic resolution of (±)-4-acetoxy-[2,2]-paracyclophane. Tetrahedron-Asymmetry 2001, 12, 2277–2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Magnusson, A.O.; Takwa, M.; Hamberg, A.; Hult, K. An S-Selective Lipase Was Created by Rational Redesign and the Enantioselectivity Increased with Temperature. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4582–4585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Csajági, C.; Szatzker, G.; Tőke, E.R.; Ürge, L.; Darvas, F.; Poppe, L. Enantiomer selective acylation of racemic alcohols by lipases in continuous-flow bioreactors. Tetrahedron-Asymmetry 2008, 19, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Boros, Z.; Falus, P.; Márkus, M.; Weiser, D.; Oláh, M.; Hornyánszky, G.; Nagy, J.; Poppe, L. How the mode of Candida antarctica lipase B immobilization affects the continuous-flow kinetic resolution of racemic amines at various temperatures. J. Mol. Catal. B-Enzym. 2013, 85–86, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Boros, Z.; Hornyánszky, G.; Nagy, J.; Poppe, L. Stereoselective hydrolase-catalyzed processes in continuous-flow mode. In Cascade Biocatalysis: Stereoselective and Environmentally Friendly Reactions; Riva, S., Fessner, W., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2014; in press. [Google Scholar]
  68. Falus, P.; Boros, Z.; Kovács, P.; Poppe, L.; Nagy, J. Lipase-catalyzed kinetic resolution of 1-(2-hydroxycyclohexyl)indoles in batch and continuous-flow systems. J. Flow Chem. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liu, T.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, Q.; Wang, J.; Yan, Y. Improving catalytic performance of Burkholderia cepacia lipase immobilized on macroporous resin NKA. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2011, 71, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yang, J.; Liu, L.; Cao, X. Combination of bioimprinting and silane precursor alkyls improved the activity of sol–gel-encapsulated lipase. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2010, 46, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Busto, E.; Gotor-Fernandez, V.; Gotor, V. Kinetic resolution of 4-chloro-2-(1-hydroxyalkyl) pyridines using Pseudomonas cepacia lipase. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 2061–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yang, J.; Guo, D.; Yan, Y. Cloning, expression and characterization of a novel thermal stable and short-chain alcohol tolerant lipase from Burkholderia cepacia strain G63. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2007, 45, 91–96. [Google Scholar]
  73. Barbosa, O.; Torres, R.; Ortiz, C.; Berenguer-Murcia, A.; Rodrigues, R.C.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Heterofunctional supports in enzyme immobilization: From traditional immobilization protocols to opportunities in tuning enzyme properties. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 2433–2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Arroyo, M.; Sánchez-Montero, J.M.; Sinisterra, J.V. Thermal stabilization of immobilized lipase B from Candida antarctica on different supports: Effect of water activity on enzymatic activity in organic media. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1999, 24, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Weiser, D.; Varga, A.; Kovács, K.; Nagy, F.; Szilágyi, A.; Vértessy, B.G.; Paizs, C.; Poppe, L. Bisepoxide cross-linked enzyme aggregates—novel immobilized biocatalysts for selective biotransformations. ChemCatChem 2014, 6, 1463–1469. [Google Scholar]
  76. Mezzetti, A.; Schrag, J.D.; Cheong, C.S.; Kazlauskas, R.J. Mirror-image packing in enantiomer discrimination: Molecular basis for the enantioselectivity of B. cepacia lipase toward 2-methyl-3-phenyl-1-propanol. Chem. Biol. 2005, 12, 427–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Woodley, J.M.; Lilly, M.D. Biotransformation Reactor Selection and Operation. In Applied Biocatalysis; Cabral, J.M.S., Best, D., Boross, L., Tramper, J., Eds.; Harwood Academic: Chur, Switzerland, 1994; pp. 371–393. [Google Scholar]
  78. Chen, C.S.; Fujimoto, Y.; Girdaukas, G.; Sih, C.J. Quantitative analyses of biochemical kinetic resolutions of enantiomers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 7294–7299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of BcL adsorbed on grafted silica gel with PEG 20k or PVA 18-88 are available from the authors.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abaházi, E.; Boros, Z.; Poppe, L. Additives Enhancing the Catalytic Properties of Lipase from Burkholderia cepacia Immobilized on Mixed-Function-Grafted Mesoporous Silica Gel. Molecules 2014, 19, 9818-9837. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules19079818

AMA Style

Abaházi E, Boros Z, Poppe L. Additives Enhancing the Catalytic Properties of Lipase from Burkholderia cepacia Immobilized on Mixed-Function-Grafted Mesoporous Silica Gel. Molecules. 2014; 19(7):9818-9837. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules19079818

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abaházi, Emese, Zoltán Boros, and László Poppe. 2014. "Additives Enhancing the Catalytic Properties of Lipase from Burkholderia cepacia Immobilized on Mixed-Function-Grafted Mesoporous Silica Gel" Molecules 19, no. 7: 9818-9837. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules19079818

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop