Next Article in Journal
Intestinal Microbiota of Fattening Pigs Offered Non-Fermented and Fermented Liquid Feed with and without the Supplementation of Non-Fermented Coarse Cereals
Previous Article in Journal
Growth, Cell Division, and Gene Expression of Escherichia coli at Elevated Concentrations of Magnesium Sulfate: Implications for Habitability of Europa and Mars
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 8
Issue 5
10.3390/microorganisms8050634
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Description of Three Novel Members in the Family Geobacteraceae, Oryzomonas japonicum gen. nov., sp. nov., Oryzomonas sagensis sp. nov., and Oryzomonas ruber sp. nov.

by
Zhenxing Xu
1,
Yoko Masuda
1,*,
Chie Hayakawa
2,
Natsumi Ushijima
3,
Keisuke Kawano
4,†,
Yutaka Shiratori
5,
Keishi Senoo
1,6 and
Hideomi Itoh
7,*
1
Department of Applied Biological Chemistry, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
2
School of Agriculture, Utsunomiya University, Tochigi 321-8505, Japan
3
Support Section for Education and Research, Graduate School of Dental Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido 060-8586, Japan
4
Department of Marine Biology and Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Tokai University, Hokkaido 005-8601, Japan
5
Niigata Agricultural Research Institute, Niigata 940-0826, Japan
6
Collaborative Research Institute for Innovative Microbiology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
7
Bioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) Hokkaido, Hokkaido 062-8517, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Present address: Division of Agriculture, Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido 060-8589, Japan.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(5), 634; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8050634
Submission received: 17 March 2020 / Revised: 24 April 2020 / Accepted: 25 April 2020 / Published: 27 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Systems Microbiology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Bacteria of the family Geobacteraceae are particularly common and deeply involved in many biogeochemical processes in terrestrial and freshwater environments. As part of a study to understand biogeochemical cycling in freshwater sediments, three iron-reducing isolates, designated as Red96T, Red100T, and Red88T, were isolated from the soils of two paddy fields and pond sediment located in Japan. The cells were Gram-negative, strictly anaerobic, rod-shaped, motile, and red-pigmented on agar plates. Growth of these three strains was coupled to the reduction of Fe(III)-NTA, Fe(III) citrate, and ferrihydrite with malate, methanol, pyruvate, and various organic acids and sugars serving as alternate electron donors. Phylogenetic analysis based on the housekeeping genes (16S rRNA gene, gyrB, rpoB, nifD, fusA, and recA) and 92 concatenated core genes indicated that all the isolates constituted a coherent cluster within the family Geobacteraceae. Genomic analyses, including average nucleotide identity and DNA–DNA hybridization, clearly differentiated the strains Red96T, Red100T, and Red88T from other species in the family Geobacteraceae, with values below the thresholds for species delineation. Along with the genomic comparison, the chemotaxonomic features further helped distinguish the three isolates from each other. In addition, the lower values of average amino acid identity and percentage of conserved protein, as well as biochemical differences with their relatives, indicated that the three strains represented a novel genus in the family Geobacteraceae. Hence, we concluded that strains Red96T, Red100T, and Red88T represented three novel species of a novel genus in the family Geobacteraceae, for which the names Oryzomonas japonicum gen. nov., sp. nov., Oryzomonas sagensis sp. nov., and Oryzomonas ruber sp. nov. are proposed, with type strains Red96T (= NBRC 114286T = MCCC 1K04376T), Red100T (= NBRC 114287T = MCCC 1K04377T), and Red88T (= MCCC 1K03694T = JCM 33033T), respectively.

1. Introduction

The family Geobacteraceae, belonging to the order Desulfuromonadales, is described as consisting of the genera Geobacter, Geomonas, and a single species Pelobacter propionicus [1,2]. Among them, the type genus Geobacter, which was first described by Lovley et al. [3] with Geobacter metalireducens as the type species, is the most major group, including 17 validated species at the time of writing (Available online: http://www.bacterio.net/geobacter.html). These species are mesophilic and obligate anaerobes, which were usually isolated from terrestrial environments such as forest soil, lotus field mud, freshwater sediments, and oil/metal-contaminated soils [4,5,6]. In addition to the culture-based explorations, the DNA- and RNA-based culture-independent analysis also supports the universal distribution of Geobacter in the soils and freshwater sediments [7,8,9]. A common feature among the members of genus Geobacter is the ability to reduce Fe(III) to Fe(II) along with the complete oxidation of acetate to CO2. Additionally, they can utilize various metals, humic substances, alcohols, hydrogen, organic acids, and aromatic compounds as electron acceptors and/or electron donors, leading to mobilization of metals and mineralization of organic compounds [4]. The ubiquitous distribution and metabolic properties of Geobacter species suggest their importance in the biogeochemical cycle of both inorganic and organic materials in the terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems.
Especially in paddy soils, the distribution and predominance of Geoobacteraceae, especially Geobacter, are reported globally [10,11,12,13,14]. At the beginning of cultivation, paddy fields are waterlogged. Immediately after that, soil redox potential decreases, and an anoxic environment develops within the plowed layer of soil [11]. Such condition induces various biogeochemical processes such as metal reductions, reductive nitrogen transformations, and methanogenesis [11]. Previous studies based on stable-isotope probing and high throughput sequencing, have suggested that Geobacteraceae, which dominates in paddy soils, is one of the major drivers directly involved in Fe(III) reduction along with acetate oxidation, nitrogen fixation, dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA), and anaerobic ammonium oxidation coupled to Fe(III) reduction (Feammox) and indirectly involved in methanogenesis [8,13,15,16,17,18]. However, limited information is available about the isolation of Geobacteraceae strains from paddy soils despite its predominance and pivotal ecological functions [16,19,20], and no paddy soil-derived validated species have been reported except for the genus Geomonas, which was recently proposed in our previous study [2]. Although freshwater sediments have prolonged waterlogged conditions unlike paddy soils, our previous study suggests that Geobacter is one of the major microbial drivers of the nitrogen cycle in freshwater sediments, as well as paddy soils [13]. However, there are fewer Geobacter strains isolated from freshwater sediments compared with microbes involved in the nitrogen cycle, such as nitrogen fixers in other genera [21]. Therefore, we focused on Geobacteraceae dominating in paddy soils and freshwater sediments, and try to expand the cultured strains for future studies based on genomics and culturomics [22].
During the screening from paddy soils and the related environments, via the soil slurry incubation as described below, three Geobacteraceae strains named Red96T, Red100T, and Red88T were isolated from two paddy fields and pond sediment, respectively. Comparative 16S rRNA gene sequencing demonstrated that these three novel strains may represent a new taxon of the family Geobacteraceae. Therefore, the present study was carried out to define the taxonomy of these three strains through polyphasic characterization.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation and Culture Conditions

The strains Red96T and Red100T were isolated from paddy soils in Nagaoka, Niigata, Japan, and Kanzaki, Saga, Japan, respectively (Figure S1). The strain Red88T was isolated from the pond sediment in Nagaoka, Niigata, Japan (Figure S1). For the isolation of these strains, we applied the following method based upon soil slurry incubation. The air-dried paddy soil, which was collected from the paddy fields in Nagaoka, Niigata, Japan, was suspended in distilled water (soil/water, 1/1.5, w/v), and 6 mL of the resulting soil suspension was transferred to a 15 mL serum bottle. The serum bottle was then autoclaved, and 60 µl of Wolfe’s vitamin solution (in l−1, 10 mg pyridoxine-HCl, 5 mg thiamine-HCl, 5 mg aminobenzoic acid, 5 mg lipoic acid, 5 mg Ca-pantothenate, 5 mg nicotinic acid, 2 mg biotin, 2 mg folic acid, and 0.01 mg vitamin B12) was added. These bottles were sealed with a butyl rubber stopper with an aluminum crimp, and the gaseous phase was exchanged with N2/CO2 (4:1, v/v). Into this soil slurry bottle, 0.1 g raw paddy soil or pond sediment was added as a microbial source and then kept at 30 °C for 2 weeks. After this incubation, 200 µl of the incubated soil suspension was transferred to the fresh soil slurry bottle and cultured at 30 °C for 2 weeks. The resulting cultures were spread on R2A broth (Nihon Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan) medium supplemented with 1.5% agar and 5 mM fumarate (modified R2A plate) and incubated in anaerobic jars at 30 °C for 10 days. The jars were provided with AnaeroPacks (Mistsubishi Gas Chemical, Tokyo, Japan) along with oxygen indicators. After the process was repeated several times, three special isolates, namely Red88T, Red96T, and Red100T, were discriminated from the others by their red colony color. It was found that these three strains also grew well in modified freshwater medium (MFM) supplemented with 20 mM fumarate as the electron acceptor and 20 mM acetate as the electron donor [2,3]. Cultures were stored at −80 °C in MFM supplemented with 10% (v/v) of DMSO. Geobacter chapellei DSM 13688T, obtained from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ), was used as the reference strain throughout the study.

2.2. Morphological and Physiological Analysis

The Gram reaction of the three strains was determined using a commercial Gram-staining kit (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cell morphology was observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, model JEM-1400, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) using the cells that were grown for 5 days on modified R2A plates at 30 °C. The temperature range for growth was investigated on modified R2A plates at different temperatures (13, 16, 20, 25, 30, 33, 37, 40, and 42 °C). The pH range for growth was examined between pH 4.5 to 8.5 in increments of 0.5 pH units using R2A broth with 20 mM fumarate (modified R2A broth) at 30 °C supplemented with different pH buffers (acetic acid/acetate, pH 4.5–5.0; MES (20 mM), pH 5.5–6.5; HEPES (20 mM), pH 7.0–8.0; tricine (20 mM), pH 8.5–9.5). For pH stability, all the vials were gassed with helium (He) to reduce the pH fluctuation caused by CO2. Growth condition was qualitied with OD600 using a spectrophotometer (Jasco V550, Tokyo, Japan) after 3 days of incubation. The effect of NaCl concentration on growth was investigated on modified R2A plates in the presence of 0% to 1.0% (w/v) NaCl in increments of 0.1%. Electron acceptor and donor utilization tests were performed using oxygen-free MFM with acetate (10 mM) as the electron donor for all electron acceptor tests and Fe(III)-NTA (10 mM) as the electron acceptor for all electron donor tests. The concentrations of tested electron acceptors and donors were utilized as described by Nevin et al. [23]. Cytochrome c analysis was carried out using the whole cells grown in degassed MFM with 20 mM acetate and 10 mM fumarate. The dithionite-reduced minus air-oxidized difference spectrum was generated on a Jasco V550 spectrophotometer [3]. Various enzyme activities of the three isolates and the reference strain were determined using API ZYM strips (bioMérieux, Lyon, France) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Fe(III)-NTA (5 mM) and Fe(III) citrate (20 mM) were used as the substrate to determine the iron reduction curve. The concentration of ferrous irons at different culture time was measured using the ferrozine assay at 562 nm with a Jasco V550 spectrophotometer, as described previously [24].

2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

The nearly complete 16S rRNA genes of the three isolates were amplified and sequenced with the primers 27F/1492R and 27F/926R/1492R, respectively, as previously described by Ashida et al. [25]. The alignments and calculations of similarity values of the almost complete 16S rRNA gene sequences corresponding to three strains were carried out using EZBioCloud’s Identify service [26]. The phylogenetic trees were constructed using the MEGA 7.0 by implementing the neighbor-joining (NJ), maximum-likelihood (ML), and maximum-parsimony (MP) methods with 1000 bootstrap replicates [27]. Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) [28] of the partial sequences of five housekeeping genes (rpoB, gyrB, recA, fusA, and nifD) was performed as described by Holmes et al. [29] with the primers NIFDF2/NIFDR2, GYR48F/GYR1010R, RPO175F/RPO800R, REC300F/REC910R, and a modified primer pair for fusA (Forward: 5′-CTNGACATCAAGATCTGCCC-3′, Reverse: 5′-TTCGCCTCNACCTTGAACTC-3′). Subsequently, the nucleic acid sequences were translated to amino acid sequences according to the standard codons. Phylogenetic analysis of these deduced amino acid sequences was performed using the MEGA 7.0 [27] by implementing the ML method based upon the best-fit substitution model after alignment and concatenation of these five housekeeping genes.

2.4. Genome Sequencing, Assembly and Annotation

Genomic DNA was extracted and purified using DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The draft genome sequencing of the three strains was performed using the Illumina HiSeq instrument according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) for 2 × 150 paired-end (PE) configuration at Genewiz Inc. (Suzhou, China). The resulting sequence reads were quality tested and then assembled using the Velvet (version: 1.2.10, available online: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/~zerbino/velvet/) [30]. The gaps were filled using SSPACE [31] and GapFiller [32]. Assembled contigs were used for G + C content calculation and preliminary gene annotation by RAST [33] and NCBI. Translated amino acids were further assigned to KEGG pathways with the BlastKOALA server [34] and the eggNOG database using eggNOG-mapper 2 [35]. All of the reference genomes used in this study were obtained from the NCBI database and analyzed equally with the three isolated strains. All the sequences were deposited in the GenBank database and the numbers are available in the Appendix A.

2.5. Genome Comparison

The average nucleotide identity (ANI) and the digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) between the three strains and other type species in the family Geobacteraceae were obtained in silico using the JspeciesWS based upon the BLAST+ [36] and the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator 2.1 (GGDC) with recommended BLAST+ alignment and Formula 2 [37]. The average amino acid identity (AAI) and percentage of conserved protein (POCP) were determined based upon annotated protein sequences as described previously [38,39] using an online-tool (Available online: http://enve-omics.ce.gatech.edu/) and a Python script (Available online: https://github.com/2015qyliang/POCP), respectively. Phylogenetic tree based on the whole genome sequences was constructed using an up-to-date bacterial core gene (UBCG) pipeline (Available online: https://www.ezbiocloud.net/tools/ubcg) with the default parameters as described by Na et al. [40]. A visual genomic comparison at the nucleotide level of the three isolated strains and their relatives was carried out by the BLAST ring image generator (BRIG) with default parameters [41]. To display the locally collinear blocks (LCBs) and their similarities, the final alignments of the three strains were performed by Mauve [42] using default parameters, and then a diagrammatic representation of these alignments was generated using genoPlotR [43]. Analysis of the core genome of the three isolated was performed using the Roary (version: 3.6.0, available online: https://github.com/sanger-pathogens/Roary) [44] along with the rapid genome annotation pipeline Prokka (version: 1.11, available online: https://github.com/tseemann/prokka) [45]. Both of them were run with default parameters.

2.6. Genomic Fingerprints

For the specific fingerprints, total genomic DNA of the three isolates was used as a template for PCR amplification by the methods of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) (primer: AGCAGCGTGG) [46] and repetitive sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) with ERIC primers (ERIC1/ERIC2) and BOX primer (BoxA1R) [47]. Then 20 uL of the PCR products were electrophoresed in a 1.5% agarose gel using 1 × TAE buffer mixed with 3.0 μL of ethidium bromide/mL under 100 V for 45 min.

2.7. Chemotaxonomic Characterization

Fatty acid detection was performed using the cells grown in modified R2A broth which were incubated at 30 °C. The strains Red96T, Red100T, and Red88T were cultured for 2 days, while the reference strain G. chapellei DSM 13688T was cultured for 4 days due to the different culture time to their late exponential growth phases. Fatty acids were extracted and methylated in accordance with the protocol described by Kuykendall et al. [48]. Subsequently, the fatty acid compositions were monitored using a gas chromatography mass spectrum (GCMS-QP2010 ultra, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with the different known fatty acids as the standard [49]. Quinones were extracted from fresh biomass grown in modified R2A broth for 5 days and purified as described previously [50]. Quinone profiles were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ACQUITY UPLC H-Class system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) by TechnoSuruga Laboratory (Shizuoka, Japan).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphological and Physiological Analysis

The three identified strains, namely Red96T, Red100T, and Red88T, were Gram-negative, strictly anaerobic, rod-shaped, and slightly curved in appearance (Figure 1). Cells were 0.4–0.8 µm wide, 1.0–3.0 µm long, and motile due to the presence of peritrichous flagella (Figure 1). The colonies grown on modified R2A plates after 5 days of incubation were red-pigmented, circular, smooth, and less than 1.5 mm in diameter (Figure 1). The three strains also showed a common growth condition such temperature ranging from 16–40 °C (optimum 30–33 °C), pH ranging from 5.0–7.5, and an optimal NaCl concentration of 0%–0.1%. Additionally, the optimal pH for strains Red96T and Red88T was 5.5–6.5, and 6.0–7.0 for strain Red100T indicating the three strains to be slightly acidophilic. Nitrate reduction occurred for strain Red88T with ammonium production, however, no such activity was observed for the strains Red96T and Red100T. The dithionite-reduced minus air-oxidized difference spectrum of all analyzed strains had peaks of c-type cytochromes. The absorption peaks for strain R88T were 418, 522, and 552 nm, strains Red96T and Red100T were 424, 524, and 554 nm, while the reference strain G. chapellei DSM 13688T were 423, 526, and 553 nm (Figure S2). The spectra obtained for Red88T were the same as that of G. metallireducens GS-15T with absorption peaks at 418 nm, 522 nm, and 552 nm [51] and were entirely different from those obtained for Red96T and Red100T. Based on API ZYM strips, the three isolates shared same enzymatic activities, they are positive for alkaline phosphatase, leucine arylamidase, acid phosphatase, and naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase activities, while the reference strain G. chapellei DSM 13688T was positive for esterase (C4), acid phosphatase, esterase lipase (C8), and naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase activities. The three isolates had ferric-reducing ability similar to other species belonging to the family Geobacteraceae. Although the ferric reducing rate of three isolates with two different ferric types were broad, most ferric irons were reduced to ferrous irons in 10 days (Figure 2). More detailed phenotypic features of these three novel strains were described in Table 1 and the species description.

3.2. Phylogenetic Analysis

Phylogenetic analysis based upon the nearly complete 16S rRNA gene sequences of strains Red96T (1428 bp, accession number MK334373), Red100T (1429 bp, accession number MK334374), and Red88T (1429 bp, accession number MK334372) demonstrated that the three strains belonged to the family Geobacteraceae in the class Deltaproteobacteria and formed a coherent branch near to Geobacter lovleyi SZT and Geobacter thiogenes K1T (Figure 3, Figures S3 and S4). On the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity, the three strains were closely related to P. propionicus Ott Bd 1T, G. lovleyi SZT, G. chapellei 172T, and G. thiogenes K1T with similarity values ranging from 95.36% to 95.73% (Table S1). The pairwise sequence similarity was observed to be in the range of 99.37% to 99.79% for the three strains (Table S1). Phylogenetic analysis of MLSA also showed that the three isolates formed an independent group within the family Geobacteraceae (Figure 4), indicating a robust phylogenetic relationship of the three strains.
Although the three strains were considered as different taxa in the family Geobacteraceae, they showed low 16S rRNA gene similarities to the two type species, G. metallireducens GS-15T and Geomonas oryzae S43T, with values in the range of 92.22%–92.43%, and 93.54%–93.75%, respectively (Table S1). Moreover, Yarza et al. [56] have proposed that the generally used arbitrary genus threshold of 95% 16S rRNA gene identity should be revised to 94.5% with a confidence interval of 94.55–95.05 and median sequence identity of 96.4%. Along with the monophyletic cluster in phylogenetic trees, we hence assessed that the three strains are not the members of two proposed genera and may represent a novel genus in the family Geobacteraceae.

3.3. Genome Characteristics

The sizes of the draft genomes of the three strains Red96T, Red100T, and Red88T were 3.6, 3.6, and 3.8 Mb contained 30, 18, and 23 contigs (>500 bp) with N50 of 336264, 620468, and 353860 bp, respectively. For strains Red96T, Red100T, and Red88T, a total of 3363, 3322, and 3523 potential coding sequences were predicted by RAST, respectively. Among them, 2224, 2092, and 2208 protein-coding genes were annotated and classified into different functional groups based on the SEED database (Figure S5). Besides, 3000, 2942, and 3060 genes with COG numbers were annotated using the eggNOG database (Figure S6), while 1426, 1412, and 1392 genes with ko numbers were annotated with the KEGG database (Figure S7). More detailed genomic features were listed in Table 2. The average G + C content of the strains Red96T, Red 100T, and R88T were 59.0, 59.7, and 58.4 mol%, respectively, markedly higher than those of the reference strain, G. chapellei DSM 13688T (50.2 mol%) [55], as well as other relatives G. lovleyi SZT (54.8 mol% from genome) and G. thiogenes K1T (52.8 mol% from genome), but comparable to their another close neighbour P. propionicus Ott Bd 1T (58.5 mol% from genome).
As described above, strains Red96T, Red100T, and Red88T exhibited the activity of Fe(III) oxide reduction (Figure 2). There are two known bacterial gene clusters involved in the ferric reduction; the porin-cytochrome genes (pcc) cluster and metal-reducing gene (mtr) cluster, which have originally elucidated in Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis, respectively [57]. In genomes of strains Red96T, Red100T, and Red88T, we found pcc homologous including constitutive genes encoding outer membrane- (OmcB/C–OmbB/C–OmaB/C), periplasmic- (PpcA), and cytoplasmic membrane- proteins (CbcL) (Table S2), suggesting that these three strains reduce Fe(III) oxide by using the porin-cytochrome system as well as Geobacter spp. [58,59]. Moreover, their genomes also harbored genes involved in the synthesis of electrically conductive pili (e-pili), including pilA coding an e-pili assembler (Table S3, [60]). e-pili plays a key role in long-range extracellular electron transport, which allows for an electron exchange with farther minerals and microorganisms [61]. Therefore, from the viewpoint of efficient electron transfer, microorganisms having e-pili are popular research targets in the field of bioelectrochemistry and biogeochemistry, such as the development of microbial fuel cells and the bioremediation of heavy metal contaminations [62]. However, e-pili synthesis genes have been found in the genomes of limited bacterial groups [63]. Strains Red96T, Red100T, and Red88T would be novel candidates as valuable microbial resources in applied biochemistry research.

3.4. Genome Comparison

To carry out a complete phylogenetic analysis, a phylogenetic tree based on 92 concatenated core genes (UBCG) was also constructed. This phylogenetic tree confirmed strains Red96T, Red100T, and Red88T formed a novel robust cluster in the family Geobacteraceae (Figure 5), supporting their distinct positions with other known species. However, the phylogenetic clades in UBCG trees differed slightly in comparison to the trees which were constructed based upon the 16S rRNA sequences and MLSA (Figure 3 and Figure 4, Figures S3 and S4). In the UBCG tree, the strain Red96T had a closer relationship with strain Red88T (Figure 5); however, it was observed to be closely related to the strain Red100T based upon the 16S rRNA gene and MLSA analysis (Figure 3 and Figure 4, Figures S3 and S4). Moreover, the discrepancy also occurred between the phylogenetically coherent branches of the three strains and their relatives for three differently constructed trees. The three isolated strains were closely related to G. lovleyi and G. thiogenes in the 16S rRNA gene and MLSA trees (Figure 3 and Figure 4, Figures S3 and S4) as compared to that of the UBCG tree where P. propionicus was observed to the closest relative (Figure 5). These conflicting results indicate that strains Red96T, Red100T, and Red88T may represent a separated taxon, including three independent subtaxa in the family Geobacteraceae.
The ANI and GGDC values were below 74.0% and 22.2%, respectively, between the strains R88T, Red96T, and Red 100T and other Geobacteraceae species (Table 3). According to the recommended species cut-off values for the ANI and GGDC (95%–96% and 70%, respectively) [64], the three isolates were suggested to be a novel taxon in the family Geobacteraceae. Furthermore, the ANI and GGDC values ranged from 94.2%–95.6% and 58.2%–67.5%, respectively, between each pair of the three isolates (Table 3). Among them, strain Red100T could be clearly separated as a novel species from Red96T and Red88T, owing to the lower ANI and GGDC values than the recommended threshold, as described above. However, slightly more variability was observed for the strains Red88T and Red96T because the genomic relatedness between them was 95.6% for ANI and 67.5% for GGDC (Table. 3), which were in the transition zone for proposing novel species: 95%–96% for ANI and 60%–70% for GGDC [65].
The maximum values of AAI and POCP were observed to be 66.6% and 61.6%, respectively, between the three isolated strains and other Geobacteraceae species (Table 3). These values were below the threshold to separate recently-proposed genus Geomonas from other Geobacteraceae species: ca. 70% for AAI and ca. 65% for POCP (Figure 6 [2]). Previous reports indicated that the AAI and POCP, based on the amino acid sequences comparison, are robust approaches to determine the bacterial genera separation [39,66]. Together with the above 16S rRNA gene similarities and phylogenetic analysis, we concluded that the three analyzed strains represent a novel genus in the family Geobacteraceae.
Additionally, the BRIG analysis suggested that most genomic regions of the five analyzed strains were conserved with at least 70% identity (Figure 7). Moreover, strains Red96T, Red100T, and Red88T showed higher identity with each other compared with the two reference strains in most genomic regions, implying that the three isolated strains are much closer to each other than to G. lovleyi and P. propionicus. Based on the core genomes, most genes (ca. 60%) were found shared by the three strains, and the less (ca. 20%) were unique genes (Figure 8), showing the comparability and individuality among them. Detailed analysis also revealed that strain Red96T shared more genes with strain Red88T (412), but less with strain Red100T (93), indicating strain Red96T had a closer relationship with strain Red88T, which is consistent with genomic phylogenetic analysis, but dissimilar with the guide tree of Mauve alignment (Figure 9), which showed strains Red96T and Red100T are more closely related to each other than to strain Red88T. Besides that, the Mauve alignment also displayed the presence of all LCBs with partial regions of inversion and rearrangement, as well as a strong synteny among these three strains (Figure 9). Although the guide tree of Mauve alignment is distinct from genomic analysis (Figure 5 and Figure 9; Table 3), it agrees with the phylogenetic analysis of MLSA and 16S rRNA (Figure 3 and Figure 4, Figures S3 and S4). This conflicting result further proved the individual status of these three strains.

3.5. Genomic Fingerprints

The banding patterns obtained using rep-PCR to fingerprint the three isolates have are shown in Figure S8. The banding patterns of the three isolates were obviously different from each other, indicating that the three isolates were not of clonal origin and were clearly different from each other.

3.6. Chemotaxonomic Characterization

The fatty acid profiles of the three isolates and the reference strain G. chapellei DSM 13688T are shown in Table 4. Predominant fatty acids of the three isolates were identified as iso-C15:0 and C16:1 ω7c, with an aggregate proportion accounting for more than 50% of all fatty acids. Besides, the strains Red100T and Red88T also contained C16:0 in greater proportions, which were 10.8% and 13.8%, respectively. C16:1 ω7c, C16:0, and iso-C15:0 were determined as the predominant fatty acids (relative account > 10%) for the reference strain G. chapellei DSM 13688T showing similar compositions to those of the three strains, however, the relative proportions distinguished them clearly. Other minor fatty acid profiles of these strains show no significant differences. The predominant respiratory quinone of the three strains was MK-8, in agreement with the major quinone component of other Geobacteraceae species [2,5,6].

4. Conclusions

In this study, three Geobacter-related strains, namely Red96T, Red100T, and Red88T, were isolated from the paddy soils and pond sediment in Japan. Taxonomic and phylogenetic analysis of the nearly complete 16S rRNA gene sequences and five concatenated housekeeping genes revealed that the three isolated strains were most similar to the species in the family Geobacteraceae, however, they shared lower 16S rRNA similarities with the two type species, G. metallireducens GS-15T and G. oryzae S43T. Moreover, the three strains showed a remarkable physiological difference from their close neighbour P. propionicus Ott Bd 1T, because P. propionicus can neither utilize acetate as an electron donor nor oxidizes organic compounds completely [52]. Additionally, unlike the three isolated strains, P. propionicus did not contain the c-type cytochromes that are involved in electron transfer to Fe(III) [52]. Meanwhile, these three strains also differed from the other two neighbors, Geobacter lovleyi SZT and Geobacter thiogenes K1T, because both of them were tested in this study that they cannot grow using R2A agar plates or broth with 5mM fumarate. Genomic analysis based on the ANI and GGDC values indicated the three strains represented at least two novel species (Red96T and Red100T) with the values below the threshold for species separation, though the status of Red88T could not be determined. Furthermore, the AAI and POCP showed lower values between the three strains and their relatives than the delineation proposed for genera separation in the family Geobacteraceae. These facts suggest that the three strains represent a novel genus in the family Geobacteraceae.
Although the strain Red88T could not be separated clearly from Red96T, owing to the high genomic relatedness located in the transition zone for novel species description, their biochemical and physiological characteristics, including the optimal growth conditions, absorption peaks of c-type cytochromes, alternative electron donors/acceptors, and fatty acid profiles, clearly differed. Furthermore, the inconsistent phylogenetic positions of the three strains in the three phylogenetic trees also suggests the independent statuses of the three isolated strains, as also supported by the core genome and rep-PCR analysis. Thus, based upon the phenotypic, chemotaxonomic, phylogenetic, and genomic characterizations performed in this study, we concluded that these three strains represented three novel species of a novel genus in the family Geobacteraceae. Hence, we proposed a novel genus, Oryzomonas gen. nov. sp. nov., comprising three novel species: Oryzomonas japonicum sp. nov., Oryzomonas sagensis sp. nov., and Oryzomonas ruber sp. nov.
Furthermore, functional tests revealed that these three strains have the ferric reducing ability, and the genomic analysis suggested that they have the long-range electron transportable capacity using their e-pili. As reported previously [4], such capacity enables the efficiency of electron transportation between metal compounds to improve, leading to metal-reducing microorganisms with e-pili being of a great significance in bioremediation of hazardous metals such as U, Se, As, and Cr, and development of microbial fuel cells [4]. Hence, this study not only improves our understanding for the diversity of important environmental microorganisms but also provides novel valuable microbial resources in applied biogeochemical science.
Together with our previous study [2], 6 type species (4 Geomonas and 2 Oryzomonas) of the family Geobacteraceae were isolated from paddy soil and revealed to be phylogenetically derivative but distinct from traditional Geobacter (Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5). Although the substantial research based on culture-independent methods indicate the predominance of Geobacter in paddy soils as described above, Geomonas and Oryzomonas have been probably confined to ‘Geobacter’ in such previous research. In order to improve our understanding of diversity of predominant members in paddy soils, a careful phylogenetic analysis should be done, taking into account the Geomonas and Oryzomonas, in data sets obtained from previous and future culture-independent approaches.
Description of Oryzomonas gen. nov.:Oryzomonas (O.ry.zo.mo’nas. Gr. fem. n. oryza, rice; L. fem. n. monas, a unit, monad; N.L. fem. n. Oryzomonas, a monad from rice soil). Cells are strictly anaerobic, Gram-negative, and rod-shaped. Colonies on R2A agar plates supplementary with 5 mM fumarate are smooth, spherical and red-pigmented. Able to use Fe(III) citrate, Fe(III)-NTA, ferrihydrite and fumarate as the electron acceptors along with a variety of different electron donors, including yeast powder, acetate, tryptone, succinate, glucose, pyruvate, glycerol, propionate, methanol, and malate. The predominant fatty acids are iso-C15:0, and C16:1 ω7c. The major quinone is MK-8. The type species is Oryzomonas japonicum.
Description of Oryzomonas japonicum sp. nov.:Oryzomonas japonicum (ja.po’ni.ca. N.L. fem. adj. japonica Japanese, pertaining to Japan). Displays the following properties besides those given in the genus description. Cells are rod shaped with light curve in appearance (0.4–0.8 µm wide, 1.0–3.0 µm long) and motile with peritrichous flagella. Strains display good growth on R2A agar plus 5–20 mM fumarate and freshwater medium. Growth occurs at 16–40 °C (optimum, 30–33 °C), at pH 5.0–7.5 (optimum, 5.5–6.5), and with 0%–0.7% (w/v) NaCl (optimum, 0–0.1%). Can also utilize lactate, mannitol, ethanol, casamino acid, nicotinate, glutamine, arginine, serine, and proline as electron donors in the presence of Fe(III)-NTA as electron acceptor, but not phenol, isopropanol, toluene, butanol, benzaldehyde or benzyl alcohol. Can also utilize Fe(III) pyrophosphate, Fe(III)-EDTA and MnO2 as electron acceptors in the presence of acetate as electron donor, but not sulfur, nitrite or nitrate. Alkaline phosphatase, acid phosphatase, leucine arylamidase, and naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase activities were present but valine arylamidase, esterase (C4), trypsin, esteraselipase (C8), lipase (C14), cystine arylamidase, α-glucosidase, α-chymotrypsin, α-galactosidase, α-mannosidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, β-glucosidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, and α-fucosidase activities are absent. The predominant fatty acids are iso-C15:0 and C16:1 ω7c. The type strain, Red96T (=NBRC 114286T = MCCC 1K04376T), was isolated from paddy soil collected from Niigata, Japan. The DNA G+C content of type strain is 59.0 mol%.
Description of Oryzomonas sagensis sp. nov.:Oryzomonas sagensis (sa.gen’sis. N.L. fem. adj. sagensis, of or pertaining to the Saga Prefecture of Japan). Displays the following properties besides those given in the genus description. Cells are rod shaped with light curve in appearance (0.4–0.8 µm wide, 1.0–2.5 µm long) and motile with peritrichous flagella. Strains display good growth on R2A agar plus 5–20 mM fumarate and freshwater medium. Growth occurs at 16–40 °C (optimum, 30–33 °C), at pH 5.0–7.5 (optimum, 6.0–7.0), and with 0%–0.5% (w/v) NaCl (optimum, 0%–0.1%). Can also utilize glutamine, mannitol, nicotinate, casamino acid, arginine, serine, and proline as electron donors in the presence of Fe(III)-NTA as the electron acceptor, but not toluene, isopropanol, phenol, lactate, butanol, benzyl alcohol, ethanol, or benzaldehyde. Can also utilize Fe(III)-EDTA and Fe(III) pyrophosphate as electron acceptor in the presence of acetate as electron donor, but not sulfur, MnO2, nitrite or nitrate. Alkaline phosphatase, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, acid phosphatase and leucine arylamidase activities were present but esterase (C4), trypsin, lipase (C14), valine arylamidase, esteraselipase (C8), cystine arylamidase, α-chymotrypsin, α-glucosidase, α-fucosidase, α-galactosidase, α-mannosidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucosidase, β-glucuronidase, and N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase activities are absent. The predominant fatty acids are iso-C15:0, C16:1ω7c and C16:0. The type strain, Red100T (= NBRC 114287T = MCCC 1K04377T), was isolated from paddy soil collected from Saga, Japan. The DNA G+C content of type strain is 59.7 mol%.
Description of Oryzomonas ruber sp. nov.:Oryzomonas ruber (ru’bra. L. fem. adj. rubra, red). Displays the following properties besides those given in the genus description. Cells are rod shaped with light curve in appearance (0.4–0.8 µm wide, 1.0–3.0 µm long) and motile with peritrichous flagella. Strains display good growth on R2A agar supplemented with 5–20 mM fumarate and freshwater medium. Growth occurs at 16–40 °C (optimum, 30–33 °C), at pH 5.0–7.5 (optimum, 5.5–6.5), and with 0%–0.5% (w/v) NaCl (optimum, 0%–0.1%). Can also utilize mannitol, lactate, nicotinate, casamino acid, ethanol, glutamine, arginine, serine, and proline as electron donors in the presence of Fe(III)-NTA as electron acceptor, but not phenol, isopropanol, benzyl alcohol, butanol, benzaldehyde or toluene. Can also utilize Fe(III)-EDTA, Fe(III) pyrophosphate, MnO2 and nitrate as electron acceptor in the presence of acetate as electron donor, but not sulfur. Alkaline phosphatase, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, acid phosphatase and leucine arylamidase activities were present but esterase (C4), trypsin, lipase (C14), valine arylamidase, esteraselipase (C8), cystine arylamidase, α-chymotrypsin, α-fucosidase, α-glucosidase, α-galactosidase, α-mannosidase, β-glucuronidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucosidase, and N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase activities are absent. The predominant fatty acids are iso-C15:0, C16:1 ω7c and C16:0. The type strain, Red88T (= MCCC 1K03694T = JCM 33033T), was isolated from sediment of a pond in Niigata, Japan. The DNA G+C content of type strain is 58.4 mol%.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/5/634/s1. Four supplementary tables and eight supplementary figures are in the online Supplementary Material. Table S1. The 16S rRNA gene similarities (%) between the three novel strains and other type strains in the family Geobacteraceae; Table S2. Annotated genes involved in ferric reduction of the three novel species; Table S3. Annotated genes involved in pilin synthesis of the three novel species; Table S4. The assembly accession numbers and genome size of the reference strains for genomic comparison. Figure S1. The geographical map of the sampling sites; Figure S2. Difference spectrum of whole cells for the four analyzed strains in the wavelength range of 400–800 nm; Figure S3. Phylogenetic tree (ML) of strains Red96T, Red100T, Red88T, and representatives in the order Desulfuromonadales based on 16S rRNA sequence divergence; Figure S4. Phylogenetic tree (MP) of strains Red96T, Red100T, Red88T, and representatives in the order Desulfuromonadales based on 16S rRNA sequence divergence; Figure S5. The gene proportion of different functional categories for the three isolated strains with RAST server; Figure S6. The gene proportion of different functional categories for the three isolated strains with the eggNOG database; Figure S7. The gene proportion of different functional categories for the three isolated strains with the KEGG database; Figure S8. Agarose gel-electrophoresis with rep-PCR and RAPD patterns of strains Red88T, Red96T, and Red100T.

Author Contributions

Z.X., Y.M., K.S., and H.I. designed the research; Y.M., H.I., and Y.S. collected soil samples from different fields; K.K. and H.I. performed isolation experiment; Z.X. performed phenotypic, chemotaxonomic and genomic analyses; C.H. analysed fatty acid profiles; N.U. took the TEM images; Z.X., Y.M., and H.I. wrote the manuscript; Z.X., Y.M., K.S., and H.I. edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP18K19165, JP18K14366, and JP17H01464 Japan, and the Canon Foundation. ZX thanks the financial support by the China Scholarship Council (CSC).

Acknowledgments

We thank Kensuke Igarashi, Haruka Ooi, and Yumi Sugisawa of the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) for their technical supports and Aharon Oren of Hebrew University of Jerusalem (Jerusalem, Israel) for helpful comments on nomenclature.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

16S rRNA gene, rpoB, recA, fusA, and nifD sequences were deposited in the GenBank database under the following numbers. 16S rRNA gene sequences: Red96T-MK334373, Red100T-MK334374, Red88T-MK334372; rpoB sequences: Red96T-MN508201, Red100T-MN508202, Red88T-MN508200; recA sequences: Red96T-MN514864, Red100T-MN514864, Red88T-MN514864; fusA sequences: Red96T-MK448247, Red100T-MK448248, Red88T-MK448246; nifD sequences: Red96T-MN514862, Red100T-MN514863, Red88T-MN514861; gyrB sequences: Red96T-MN508204, Red100T-MN508205, Red88T-MN508203.
The genomes of strains Red96T, Red100T and Red88T were deposited at DDBJ/ENA/NCBI under the accessions VZQZ00000000, VZRA00000000, and SRSD00000000, respectively.

References

  1. Röling, W.F.M. The Family Geobacteraceae. In The Prokaryotes; Rosenberg, E., DeLong, E.F., Lory, S., Stackebrandt, E., Thompson, F., Eds.; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 157–172. [Google Scholar]
  2. Xu, Z.; Masuda, Y.; Itoh, H.; Ushijima, N.; Shiratori, Y.; Senoo, K. Geomonas edaphica sp. nov., Geomonas ferrireducens sp. nov., Geomonas terrae sp. nov., four ferric-reducing bacteria isolated from paddy soil, and reclassification of three species of the genus Geobacter as members of the genus Geomonas gen. nov. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lovley, D.R.; Giovannoni, S.J.; White, D.C.; Champine, J.E.; Phillips, E.J.P.; Gorby, Y.A.; Goodwin, S. Geobacter metallireducens gen. nov. sp. nov., a microorganism capable of coupling the complete oxidation of organic compounds to the reduction of iron and other metals. Arch. Microbiol. 1993, 159, 336–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lovley, D.R.; Ueki, T.; Zhang, T.; Malvankar, N.S.; Shrestha, P.M.; Flanagan, K.A.; Aklujkar, M.; Butler, J.E.; Giloteaux, L.; Rotaru, A.E.; et al. Geobacter: The microbe electric’s physiology, ecology, and practical applications. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 2011, 59, 1–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Viulu, S.; Nakamura, K.; Okada, Y.; Saitou, S.; Takamizawa, K. Geobacter luticola sp. nov., an Fe (III)-reducing bacterium isolated from lotus field mud. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013, 2, 442–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Zhou, S.; Yang, G.; Lu, Q.; Wu, M. Geobacter soli sp. nov., a dissimilatory Fe(III)-reducing bacterium isolated from forest soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 3786–3791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Holmes, D.E.; Giloteaux, L.; Chaurasia, A.K.; Williams, K.H.; Luef, B.; Wilkins, M.J.; Wrighton, K.C.; Thompson, C.A.; Comolli, L.R.; Lovley, D.R. Evidence of Geobacter-associated phage in a uranium-contaminated aquifer. ISME J. 2015, 9, 333–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Hori, T.; Müller, A.; Igarashi, Y.; Conrad, R.; Friedrich, M.W. Identification of iron-reducing microorganisms in anoxic rice paddy soil by 13C-acetate probing. ISME J. 2010, 4, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Z.; Suzuki, D.; Zhang, C.; Yang, S.; Nan, J.; Yoshida, N.; Wang, A.; Katayama, A. Anaerobic 4-chlorophenol mineralization in an enriched culture under iron-reducing conditions. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2014, 118, 529–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ding, L.J.; Su, J.Q.; Xu, H.J.; Jia, Z.J.; Zhu, Y.G. Long-term nitrogen fertilization of paddy soil shifts iron-reducing microbial community revealed by RNA-13C-acetate probing coupled with pyrosequencing. ISME J. 2015, 9, 721–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Itoh, H.; Ishii, S.; Shiratori, Y.; Oshima, K.; Otsuka, S.; Hattori, M.; Senoo, K. Seasonal transition of active bacterial and archaeal communities in relation to water management in paddy soils. Microbes Environ. 2013, 28, 370–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Kim, Y.; Liesack, W. Differential assemblage of functional units in paddy soil microbiomes. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0122221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Masuda, Y.; Itoh, H.; Shiratori, Y.; Isobe, K.; Otsuka, S.; Senoo, K. Predominant but previously-overlooked prokaryotic drivers of reductive nitrogen transformation in paddy soils, revealed by metatranscriptomics. Microbes Environ. 2017, 32, 180–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Tipayno, S.C.; Truu, J.; Samaddar, S.; Truu, M.; Preem, J.K.; Oopkaup, K.; Espenberg, M.; Chatterjee, P.; Kang, Y.; Kim, K.; et al. The bacterial community structure and functional profile in the heavy metal contaminated paddy soils, surrounding a nonferrous smelter in South Korea. Ecol. Evol. 2018, 8, 6157–6168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Holmes, D.E.; Shrestha, P.M.; Walker, D.J.F.; Dang, Y.; Nevin, K.P.; Woodard, T.L.; Lovley, D.R. Metatranscriptomic evidence for direct interspecies electron transfer between Geobacter and Methanothrix species in methanogenic rice paddy soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e00223-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Hori, T.; Aoyagi, T.; Itoh, H.; Narihiro, T.; Oikawa, A.; Suzuki, K.; Ogata, A.; Friedrich, M.W.; Conrad, R.; Kamagata, Y. Isolation of microorganisms involved in reduction of crystalline iron(III) oxides in natural environments. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Li, H.; Su, J.Q.; Yang, X.R.; Zhou, G.W.; Lassen, S.B.; Zhu, Y.G. RNA stable isotope probing of potential feammox population in paddy soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 4841–4849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Masuda, Y.; Itoh, H.; Shiratori, Y.; Senoo, K. Metatranscriptomic insights into microbial consortia driving methane metabolism in paddy soils. Soil Sci. Plant. Nutr. 2018, 64, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Deng, D.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y. A Geobacter strain isolated from rice paddy soil with higher bioelectricity generation capability in comparison to Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 43978–43989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ohtsuka, T.; Yamaguchi, N.; Makino, T.; Sakurai, K.; Kimura, K.; Kudo, K.; Homma, E.; Dong, D.T.; Amachi, S. Arsenic dissolution from Japanese paddy soil by a dissimilatory arsenate-reducing bacterium Geobacter sp. OR-1. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 6263–6271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Willems, A. The taxonomy of rhizobia: An overview. Plant. Soil 2006, 287, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lagier, J.C.; Dubourg, G.; Million, M.; Cadoret, F.; Bilen, M.; Fenollar, F.; Rolain, J.M.; Fournier, P.E.; Raoult, D. Culturing the human microbiota and culturomics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 16, 540–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Nevin, K.P.; Holmes, D.E.; Woodard, T.L.; Hinlein, E.S.; Ostendorf, D.W.; Lovley, D.R. Geobacter bemidjiensis sp. nov. and Geobacter psychrophilus sp. nov., two novel Fe(III)-reducing subsurface isolates. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 1667–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Onley, J.R.; Ahsan, S.; Sanford, R.A. Denitrification by Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans, a common soil bacterium lacking the nitrite reductase genes nirS and nirK. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ashida, N.; Ishii, S.; Hayano, S.; Tago, K.; Tsuji, T.; Yoshimura, Y.; Otsuka, S.; Senoo, K. Isolation of functional single cells from environments using a micromanipulator: Application to study denitrifying bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 85, 1211–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yoon, S.H.; Ha, S.M.; Kwon, S.; Lim, J.; Kim, Y.; Seo, H.; Chun, J. Introducing EzBioCloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 1613–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Glaeser, S.P.; Kämpfer, P. Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) in prokaryotic taxonomy. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 38, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Holmes, D.E.; Nevin, K.P.; Lovley, D.R. Comparison of 16S rRNA, nifD, recA, gyrB, rpoB and fusA genes within the family Geobacteraceae fam. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004, 54, 1591–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zerbino, D.R.; Birney, E. Velvet: Algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008, 18, 821–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Boetzer, M.; Henkel, C.V.; Jansen, H.J.; Butler, D.; Pirovano, W. Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics 2010, 27, 578–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Boetzer, M.; Pirovano, W. Toward almost closed genomes with GapFiller. Genome Biol. 2012, 13, R56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Aziz, R.K.; Bartels, D.; Best, A.A.; DeJongh, M.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Formsma, K.; Gerdes, S.; Glass, E.M.; Kubal, M.; et al. The RAST Server: Rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Kanehisa, M.; Sato, Y.; Morishima, K. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 2016, 428, 726–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Huerta-Cepas, J.; Forslund, K.; Coelho, L.P.; Szklarczyk, D.; Jensen, L.J.; von Mering, C.; Bork, P. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-Mapper. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 2115–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Richter, M.; Rosselló-Móra, R.; Oliver Glöckner, F.; Peplies, J. JSpeciesWS: A web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 929–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Auch, A.F.; Klenk, H.P.; Göker, M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinform. 2013, 14, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Konstantinidis, K.T.; Tiedje, J.M. Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 6258–6264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Qin, Q.L.; Xie, B.B.; Zhang, X.Y.; Chen, X.L.; Zhou, B.C.; Zhou, J.; Oren, A.; Zhang, Y.Z. A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J. Bacteriol. 2014, 196, 2210–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Na, S.I.; Kim, Y.O.; Yoon, S.H.; Ha, S.; Baek, I.; Chun, J. UBCG: Up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J. Microbiol. 2018, 56, 280–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Alikhan, N.F.; Petty, N.K.; Zakour, N.L.B.; Beatson, S.A. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): Simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genomics 2011, 12, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Darling, A.C.E.; Mau, B.; Blattner, F.R.; Perna, N.T. Mauve: Multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 2004, 14, 1394–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Guy, L.; Kultima, J.R.; Andersson, S.G.E. genoPlotR: Comparative gene and genome visualization in R. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 2334–2335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Page, A.J.; Cummins, C.A.; Hunt, M.; Wong, V.K.; Reuter, S.; Holden, M.T.G.; Fookes, M.; Falush, D.; Keane, J.A.; Parkhill, J. Roary: Rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3691–3693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2068–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yu, K.; Pauls, K.P. Optimization of the PCR program for RAPD analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20, 2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Versalovic, J.; Schneider, M.; De Bruijn, F.J.; Lupski, J.R. Genomic fingerprinting of bacteria using repetitive sequence-based polymerase chain reaction. Methods Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994, 5, 25–40. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kuykendall, L.D.; Roy, M.A.; O’neill, J.J.; Devine, T.E. Fatty acids, antibiotic resistance, and deoxyribonucleic acid homology groups of Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1988, 38, 358–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Gunina, A.; Dippold, M.A.; Glaser, B.; Kuzyakov, Y. Fate of low molecular weight organic substances in an arable soil: From microbial uptake to utilisation and stabilisation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 77, 304–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bligh, E.G.; Dyer, W.J. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 1959, 37, 911–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Afkar, E.; Fukumori, Y. Purification and characterization of triheme cytochrome c7 from the metal-reducing bacterium, Geobacter metallireducens. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999, 175, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Schink, B. Fermentation of 2,3-butanediol by Pelobacter carbinolicus sp. nov. and Pelobacter propionicus sp. nov., and evidence for propionate formation from C2 compounds. Arch. Microbiol. 1984, 137, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Sung, Y.; Fletcher, K.E.; Ritalahti, K.M.; Apkarian, R.P.; Ramos-Hernández, N.; Sanford, R.A.; Mesbah, N.M.; Löffler, F.E. Geobacter lovleyi sp. nov. strain SZ, a novel metal-reducing and tetrachloroethene-dechlorinating bacterium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 2775–2782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Nevin, K.P.; Holmes, D.E.; Woodard, T.L.; Covalla, S.F.; Lovley, D.R. Reclassification of Trichlorobacter thiogenes as Geobacter thiogenes comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 463–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Coates, J.D.; Bhupathiraju, V.K.; Achenbach, L.A.; Mcinerney, M.J.; Lovley, D.R. Geobacter hydrogenophilus, Geobacter chapellei and Geobacter grbiciae, three new, strictly anaerobic, dissimilatory Fe(III)-reducers. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2001, 335182, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Yarza, P.; Yilmaz, P.; Pruesse, E.; Glöckner, F.O.; Ludwig, W.; Schleifer, K.H.; Whitman, W.B.; Euzéby, J.; Amann, R.; Rosselló-Móra, R. Uniting the classification of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene sequences. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 12, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Shi, L.; Dong, H.; Reguera, G.; Beyenal, H.; Lu, A.; Liu, J.; Yu, H.Q.; Fredrickson, J.K. Extracellular electron transfer mechanisms between microorganisms and minerals. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 651–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Shi, L.; Fredrickson, J.K.; Zachara, J.M. Genomic analyses of bacterial porin-cytochrome gene clusters. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cai, X.; Huang, L.; Yang, G.; Yu, Z.; Wen, J.; Zhou, S. Transcriptomic, proteomic, and bioelectrochemical characterization of an exoelectrogen Geobacter soli grown with different electron acceptors. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Holmes, D.E.; Dang, Y.; Walker, D.J.F.; Lovley, D.R. The electrically conductive pili of Geobacter species are a recently evolved feature for extracellular electron transfer. Microb. genomics 2016, 2, e000072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lovley, D.R.; Walker, D. Geobacter protein nanowires. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Malvankar, N.S.; Lovley, D.R. Microbial nanowires for bioenergy applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 27, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Walker, D.J.; Adhikari, R.Y.; Holmes, D.E.; Ward, J.E.; Woodard, T.L.; Nevin, K.P.; Lovley, D.R. Electrically conductive pili from pilin genes of phylogenetically diverse microorganisms. ISME J. 2018, 12, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Chun, J.; Oren, A.; Ventosa, A.; Christensen, H.; Arahal, D.R.; da Costa, M.S.; Rooney, A.P.; Yi, H.; Xu, X.W.; Meyer, S.D.; et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Richter, M.; Rosselló-Móra, R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009, 106, 19126–19131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Luo, C.; Rodriguez-R, L.M.; Konstantinidis, K.T. MyTaxa: An advanced taxonomic classifier for genomic and metagenomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, e73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Microorganisms 08 00634 g001 550
Figure 1. Colony and cell morphology of three isolated strains: Oryzomonas japonicum Red96T (A), O. sagensis Red100T (B), and O. ruber R88T (C). Upper and bottom panels indicate colonies on the modified R2A plate and TEM image of the cells, respectively.
Figure 1. Colony and cell morphology of three isolated strains: Oryzomonas japonicum Red96T (A), O. sagensis Red100T (B), and O. ruber R88T (C). Upper and bottom panels indicate colonies on the modified R2A plate and TEM image of the cells, respectively.
Microorganisms 08 00634 g001
Microorganisms 08 00634 g002 550
Figure 2. Reduction of insoluble Fe(III) by the three novel strains: Oryzomonas japonicum Red96T, O. sagensis Red100T, and O. ruber R88T. The experiments were performed using MFW medium with 10 mM acetate as the electron donor. (A) Soluble ferrous concentration from Fe(III)-NTA reduction; (B) soluble ferrous concentration from Fe(III) citrate reduction. Data derived from triplicate tests were presented as means ± standard deviations (SD).
Figure 2. Reduction of insoluble Fe(III) by the three novel strains: Oryzomonas japonicum Red96T, O. sagensis Red100T, and O. ruber R88T. The experiments were performed using MFW medium with 10 mM acetate as the electron donor. (A) Soluble ferrous concentration from Fe(III)-NTA reduction; (B) soluble ferrous concentration from Fe(III) citrate reduction. Data derived from triplicate tests were presented as means ± standard deviations (SD).
Microorganisms 08 00634 g002
Microorganisms 08 00634 g003 550
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of strains Red96T, Red100T, Red88T, and representatives in the order Desulfuromonadales based on 16S rRNA sequence divergence. The tree was inferred by the neighbor-joining (NJ) algorithm using MEGA 7.0 with Kimura 2-parameter model. Habitats, representing the isolation source of the type strains, are coded by different marks. The background colors represent different bacterial genera. Bootstrap values (expressed as percentages of 1000 replications) over 50% are shown at branching nodes. Bar, 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of strains Red96T, Red100T, Red88T, and representatives in the order Desulfuromonadales based on 16S rRNA sequence divergence. The tree was inferred by the neighbor-joining (NJ) algorithm using MEGA 7.0 with Kimura 2-parameter model. Habitats, representing the isolation source of the type strains, are coded by different marks. The background colors represent different bacterial genera. Bootstrap values (expressed as percentages of 1000 replications) over 50% are shown at branching nodes. Bar, 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Microorganisms 08 00634 g003
Microorganisms 08 00634 g004 550
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree of strains Red96T, Red100T, Red88T, and representatives in the order Desulfuromonadales based on deduced protein sequences of five concatenated housekeeping gene: fusA (1–196 amino acids), gyrB (197–491 amino acids), nifD (492–752 amino acids), recA (753–977 amino acids) and rpoB (978–1177 amino acids). The background colors represent different bacterial genera. The tree was inferred by maximum-likelihood (ML) with the best-fit substitution model (LG + G), and 1000 bootstrap replicates. Over 50% are shown at branching nodes. Bar, 0.1 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree of strains Red96T, Red100T, Red88T, and representatives in the order Desulfuromonadales based on deduced protein sequences of five concatenated housekeeping gene: fusA (1–196 amino acids), gyrB (197–491 amino acids), nifD (492–752 amino acids), recA (753–977 amino acids) and rpoB (978–1177 amino acids). The background colors represent different bacterial genera. The tree was inferred by maximum-likelihood (ML) with the best-fit substitution model (LG + G), and 1000 bootstrap replicates. Over 50% are shown at branching nodes. Bar, 0.1 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Microorganisms 08 00634 g004
Microorganisms 08 00634 g005 550
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree of strains Red96T, Red100T, Red88T, and representatives in the order Desulfuromonadales based on the whole genome sequences. The tree was reconstructed based on a concatenated alignment of 92 core genes using RAxML tool with GTR + CAT model [40]. The background colors represent different bacterial genera. Bootstrap values (expressed as percentages of 100 replications) over 50% are shown at branching nodes. Bar, 0.1 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree of strains Red96T, Red100T, Red88T, and representatives in the order Desulfuromonadales based on the whole genome sequences. The tree was reconstructed based on a concatenated alignment of 92 core genes using RAxML tool with GTR + CAT model [40]. The background colors represent different bacterial genera. Bootstrap values (expressed as percentages of 100 replications) over 50% are shown at branching nodes. Bar, 0.1 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Microorganisms 08 00634 g005
Microorganisms 08 00634 g006 550
Figure 6. Comparisons of genomic similarities based on AAI and POCP values. The points represent average comparison values between the three novel strains and their close relatives in the family Geobacteraceae. A total of 20 genomes were included in this analysis.
Figure 6. Comparisons of genomic similarities based on AAI and POCP values. The points represent average comparison values between the three novel strains and their close relatives in the family Geobacteraceae. A total of 20 genomes were included in this analysis.
Microorganisms 08 00634 g006
Microorganisms 08 00634 g007 550
Figure 7. Circular representation of whole-genome sequences of Oryzomonas japonicum Red96T, O. sagensis Red100T, O. ruber R88T, and their two neighbors: Pelobacter propionicus DSM 2379T and Geobacter lovleyi SZT. The rings from inner to outer: ring 1–GC content, ring 2–GC skew, ring 3–whole-genome sequences of O. japonicum Red96T (red), ring 4–whole-genome sequences of O. sagensis Red100T (green), ring 5–whole-genome sequences of O. ruber R88T (pink), ring 6–whole genome sequences of P. propionicus DSM 2379T (cyan), ring 7–whole-genome sequences of G. lovleyi SZT (blue). The genome of O. japonicum Red96T was used as the reference for global comparisons.
Figure 7. Circular representation of whole-genome sequences of Oryzomonas japonicum Red96T, O. sagensis Red100T, O. ruber R88T, and their two neighbors: Pelobacter propionicus DSM 2379T and Geobacter lovleyi SZT. The rings from inner to outer: ring 1–GC content, ring 2–GC skew, ring 3–whole-genome sequences of O. japonicum Red96T (red), ring 4–whole-genome sequences of O. sagensis Red100T (green), ring 5–whole-genome sequences of O. ruber R88T (pink), ring 6–whole genome sequences of P. propionicus DSM 2379T (cyan), ring 7–whole-genome sequences of G. lovleyi SZT (blue). The genome of O. japonicum Red96T was used as the reference for global comparisons.
Microorganisms 08 00634 g007
Microorganisms 08 00634 g008 550
Figure 8. Venn diagram of homologs showing the number of shared coding regions among the three strains Oryzomonas japonicum Red96T (blue), O. sagensis Red100T (red), and O. ruber R88T (green).
Figure 8. Venn diagram of homologs showing the number of shared coding regions among the three strains Oryzomonas japonicum Red96T (blue), O. sagensis Red100T (red), and O. ruber R88T (green).
Microorganisms 08 00634 g008
Microorganisms 08 00634 g009 550
Figure 9. Multiple genome alignment of the three novel strains Oryzomonas japonicum Red96T (top), O. sagensis Red100T (middle), and O. ruber R88T (bottom). The genome of O. japonicum Red96T was used as the reference for global alignment. Lines connect the homologous local conserved blocks (LCBs) between the genomes, with red color showing the connection between LCBs that are in the same orientation and blue color showing the connection between LCBs that are in the opposite orientation. Conserved and highly related regions are deeply colored. The tree shown on the left represents the guide tree of the Mauve alignment.
Figure 9. Multiple genome alignment of the three novel strains Oryzomonas japonicum Red96T (top), O. sagensis Red100T (middle), and O. ruber R88T (bottom). The genome of O. japonicum Red96T was used as the reference for global alignment. Lines connect the homologous local conserved blocks (LCBs) between the genomes, with red color showing the connection between LCBs that are in the same orientation and blue color showing the connection between LCBs that are in the opposite orientation. Conserved and highly related regions are deeply colored. The tree shown on the left represents the guide tree of the Mauve alignment.
Microorganisms 08 00634 g009
Table
Table 1. Differential characteristics between the three novel species and the type strains of phylogenetically related species of the family Geobacteraceae.
Table 1. Differential characteristics between the three novel species and the type strains of phylogenetically related species of the family Geobacteraceae.
Characteristic.123456789
Optimal temperature (°C)30–3330–3330–332533353030–3530–33
Optimal pH5.5–6.56.0–7.05.5–6.56.5–7.07.0–8.06.87.0ca. 6.76.0–7.0
G + C content (mol%) *59.059.758.450.2 a58.554.852.856.661.2
Motility+++−−+−−+
Electron acceptor usage
Nitrate−−+−−++++
Fumarate++++−++−+
Sulfur−−−−−++−−
MnO2+−++ND+−+−
Fe(III) citrate++++ND+−+−
electron donor usage
Succinate++++ND−−−+
Butanol−−−−+NDND+−
Ethanol+−+−+−−++
Propionate++++−−−++
Malate++++−ND−−+
Lactate+−+++−−−+
Methanol++++−−ND−+
Pyruvate++++++−++
Glucose++++−−ND−+
Toluene−−−−ND−ND+−
1. Oryzomonas japonicum Red96T (data from this study); 2. Oryzomonas sagensis Red100T (data from this study); 3. Oryzomonas ruber R88T (data from this study); 4. Geobacter chapellei DSM 13688T (data from this study); 5. Pelobacter propionicus Ott Bd 1T (data from Schink, 1984 [52]); 6. Geobacter lovleyi SZT (data from Sung et al., 2006 [53]); 7. Geobacter thiogenes K1T (data from Nevin et al., 2007 [54]); 8. Geobacter metallireducens GS-15T (data from Lovley et al., 1993 [3]; Zhou et al., 2014 [6]); 9. Geomonas oryzae S43T (data from Xu et al., 2019 [2]). +, Positive; −, negative. ND, no data. * Data from genomic analysis except: a, data from HPLC [55].
Table
Table 2. General genome features of three novel species: Oryzomonas japonicum Red96T, O. sagensis Red100T, and O. ruber Red88T.
Table 2. General genome features of three novel species: Oryzomonas japonicum Red96T, O. sagensis Red100T, and O. ruber Red88T.
FeaturesRed96TRed100TRed88T
Assembled contigs301716
Genome length (bp)3,624,5873,609,7423,798,725
N50 length (bp)336,264620,468353,860
Average G + C content (mol%)59.059.758.4
Number of predicted ORFs 336333223523
Number of rRNAs543
Number of tRNAs495150
Number of ncRNAs333
Depth of coverage (×)808958271
Accession numberVZQZ00000000VZRA01000000SRSD01000000
Table
Table 3. Genomic similarities (%) of ANI, GGDC, AAI, and POCP between the three strains and other type species in the family Geobacteraceae.
Table 3. Genomic similarities (%) of ANI, GGDC, AAI, and POCP between the three strains and other type species in the family Geobacteraceae.
Reference Strains #ANI Value (%)GGDC Value (%)AAI Value (%)POCP (%)
Red96TRed100TRed88TRed96TRed100TRed88TRed96TRed100 TRed88 TRed96 TRed100 TRed88 T
Oryzomonas japonicum Red96T100 100 100 100
Oryzomonas sagensis Red100T94.2100 58.2100 95.0100 86.0100
Oryzomonas ruber Red88T95.694.610067.561.710096.395.210085.083.5100
Pelobacter propionicus Ott Bd 1T73.874.073.920.621.121.166.666.666.452.651.850.8
Geobacter lovleyi SZT70.770.670.819.819.919.863.663.663.456.355.454.8
Geobacter thiogenes ATCC BAA-34T70.370.070.319.220.019.763.763.563.255.854.753.6
Geobacter metallireducens GS-15T70.870.970.820.219.920.262.362.46257.857.356.6
Geobacter uraniireducens Rf4T70.770.670.420.220.620.362.862.162.354.353.753.0
Geobacter toluenoxydans JCM 15764T69.769.869.520.020.519.361.160.860.549.449.047.8
Geobacter daltonii FRC-32T69.669.569.320.322.220.661.361.060.754.954.553.1
Geobacter sulfurreducens PCAT70.870.870.920.020.520.262.662.762.360.359.759.0
Geobacter anodireducens SD-1T71.071.071.119.720.220.061.461.461.353.553.252.5
Geobacter pickeringii G13T71.571.471.520.320.720.663.363.363.461.661.660.4
Geobacter soli GSS01T71.071.071.019.820.320.162.462.362.359.458.958.4
Geomonas oryzae S43T70.370.570.319.319.419.360.860.760.757.856.956.9
Geomonas edaphica Red53T70.370.370.219.219.119.360.960.960.658.056.756.8
Geomonas ferrireducens S62T70.370.370.319.319.219.560.960.660.557.456.055.8
Geomonas terrae Red111T69.870.069.919.019.319.260.560.660.358.156.656.7
Geomonas bemidjiensis BemT70.270.370.219.819.819.960.660.660.556.856.156.1
Geomonas bremensis R170.470.270.319.919.919.960.460.460.156.455.755.5
# Genomes of all reference strains were retrieved from the NCBI database with the accession numbers and genome size listed in Table S4.
Table
Table 4. Fatty acid compositions of the three novel strains and the reference strain Geobacter chapellei DSM 13688T.
Table 4. Fatty acid compositions of the three novel strains and the reference strain Geobacter chapellei DSM 13688T.
Fatty Acid1234
C12:0--0.11.9
iso-C13:00.20.30.32.6
C14:05.59.49.94.5
iso-C15:052.140.433.519.1
a-C15:00.70.50.50.8
C15:00.40.60.40.4
C15:1 B/F *1.41.31.30.4
iso-C16:01.70.80.81.3
C16:07.410.813.820.1
C16:1 B/F *1.90.50.41.9
C16:1 ω7c19.222.226.032.9
C16:1 ω5c0.70.61.02.1
C16:0 10-methyl0.90.60.8ND
C16:0 3-OH2.27.07.47.3
C17:1 B/F *1.60.60.50.3
iso-C17:0 1.50.90.80.9
a-C17:00.10.10.10.2
C18:00.30.60.61.1
C18:1 ω7c1.51.11.00.4
1. Oryzomonas japonicum Red96T; 2. Oryzomonas sagensis Red100T; 3. Oryzomonas ruber R88T; 4. Geobacter chapellei DSM 13688T. All data listed in this table derived from this study, only those accounting for 0.2% or more of the total in one or more of the strains are given. -, trace quantities (<0.1%). ND, not detected. * The double bond position could not be identified (except for C15:1 ω5c, C16:1 ω5c, C16:1 ω7c, and C17:1 ω7c).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, Z.; Masuda, Y.; Hayakawa, C.; Ushijima, N.; Kawano, K.; Shiratori, Y.; Senoo, K.; Itoh, H. Description of Three Novel Members in the Family Geobacteraceae, Oryzomonas japonicum gen. nov., sp. nov., Oryzomonas sagensis sp. nov., and Oryzomonas ruber sp. nov. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 634. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8050634

AMA Style

Xu Z, Masuda Y, Hayakawa C, Ushijima N, Kawano K, Shiratori Y, Senoo K, Itoh H. Description of Three Novel Members in the Family Geobacteraceae, Oryzomonas japonicum gen. nov., sp. nov., Oryzomonas sagensis sp. nov., and Oryzomonas ruber sp. nov. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(5):634. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8050634

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Zhenxing, Yoko Masuda, Chie Hayakawa, Natsumi Ushijima, Keisuke Kawano, Yutaka Shiratori, Keishi Senoo, and Hideomi Itoh. 2020. "Description of Three Novel Members in the Family Geobacteraceae, Oryzomonas japonicum gen. nov., sp. nov., Oryzomonas sagensis sp. nov., and Oryzomonas ruber sp. nov." Microorganisms 8, no. 5: 634. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8050634

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop