Next Article in Journal
DEP-on-a-Chip: Dielectrophoresis Applied to Microfluidic Platforms
Next Article in Special Issue
Detection of Coxiella burnetii Using Silicon Microring Resonator in Patient Blood Plasma
Previous Article in Journal
A Shear-Mode Piezoelectric Heterostructure for Electric Current Sensing in Electric Power Grids
Previous Article in Special Issue
Silver Doped Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Based Electrochemical Enzyme-Less Sensor for Determination of H2O2 Released from Live Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Research Progress of Near-Infrared Fluorescence Immunoassay

1
Beijing Inspection & Quarantine Testing Center, Beijing 100026, China
2
Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
3
College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
4
China National Institute of Standardization, Beijing 100191, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2019, 10(6), 422; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10060422
Submission received: 4 April 2019 / Revised: 16 June 2019 / Accepted: 17 June 2019 / Published: 24 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biosensors for Pathogen Detection)

Abstract

:
Near-infrared fluorescence probes (NIFPs) have been widely used in immunoassay, bio-imaging and medical diagnosis. We review the basic principles of near-infrared fluorescence and near-infrared detection technology, and summarize structures, properties and characteristics of NIFPs (i.e., cyanines, xanthenes fluorescent dyes, phthalocyanines, porphyrin derivates, single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), quantum dots and rare earth compounds). We next analyze applications of NIFPs in immunoassays, and prospect the application potential of lateral flow assay (LFA) in rapid detection of pathogens. At present, our team intends to establish a new platform that has highly sensitive NIFPs combined with portable and simple immunochromatographic test strips (ICTSs) for rapid detection of food-borne viruses. This will provide technical support for rapid detection on the port.

1. Introduction

Near-infrared fluorescent probes have a characteristic molecular structure with a highly conjugated polyene system. This exhibits a long emission wavelength over 650 nm up to 900 nm [1,2]. In this region, it has lower tissue autofluorescence, and less fluorescence extinction enhances deep tissue penetration with minimal background interference. Due to its high sensitivity and selectivity, fluorescence spectroscopy has a wide range of applications in analytical chemistry, especially in bioanalysis [3,4]. Most biomolecules have no fluorescence or weak fluorescence, and their detection sensitivity is low. In order to detect them with high sensitivity, people use fluorescent labeling reagents or fluoregenic reagents to label or derivatize the analytes. The formation of a covalent or non-covalently bound material with high fluorescence intensity greatly decreases the detection limit. Near infrared (NIR) fluorescence detection has obvious advantages in biological sample analysis.
Near-infrared fluorescent dyes are classified into the following categories, including cyanines, xanthenes fluorescent dyes, 4,4-difluoro-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (BODIPYs), phthalocyanines, porphyrin derivates and other related fluorescent dyes (as shown in Figure 1). Many organisms and their tissues emit fluorescence under the excitation of visible light, which seriously interferes with the fluorescence detection of biological samples. For biological samples, the sample matrix and some impurities also have light absorption or fluorescence in this region (<600 nm). Light scattering from biological samples can cause more serious background interference, limiting the sensitivity of fluorescence analysis. Compared with conventional fluorescence (λem < 600 nm) detection, the light absorption or fluorescence intensity of the biological sample matrix is small in the near-infrared fluorescence (λem > 600 nm) region. Therefore, the background interference is greatly reduced, since the intensity of the scattered light is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the wavelength. As the wavelength increases, the Rayleigh scattering rapidly decreases, and the scattering interference is also greatly reduced.
In recent years, near-infrared fluorescent labeling reagents and detection techniques based on diode lasers with compact structure, good stability and low price have had higher sensitivity. The techniques have been used for near-infrared fluorescence immunoassays, flow cytometry, and fluorescence detection of biological active substances in high performance capillary electrophoresis separation. At the same time, with the continuous integration of various technologies, the development of many rapid detection devices such as laser fluorescence, sensors and immunodetection devices has promoted near-infrared fluorescent marker detection and analysis progress in the biological field [5].
NIR spectroscopy technology has many advantages in application areas. NIR spectroscopy can be used for food quality analysis, such as freshness of agricultural products, fruit firmness and quality, fruit sugar and acidity, the quality of baked products and detecting alcohol during alcohol fermentation in the food industry [6,7]. It also can detect changes in sugar content, prediction of different meat characteristics, determination of nutrients in dairy products and authentic identification of edible oil [8,9]. In agriculture, it can be applied in crop quality analysis and evaluation, crop variety resource identification and quality breeding and crop resistance index analysis [10,11]. In the field of pharmaceutical research, near-infrared spectroscopy can comprehensively analyze the grain size, crystal form, cleanliness, apparent density and optical rotation of the drug raw materials [12,13]. It can analyze pharmaceutical preparations as well as online monitoring and control of drugs [14]. Near-infrared spectroscopy is also widely used in other fields such as petrochemicals, polymer chemicals, basic organic chemicals and the textile industry [15,16]. Near-infrared spectroscopy has new developments in other fields such as microbiology and clinical medicine [17,18]. Currently, most of the research objects are bacteria and yeast and a few objects are fungi and algae [19,20,21].

2. Near-Infrared Fluorescent Probe Types

Near infrared fluorescence immunoassay is a novel lateral flow assay (LFA) that combines near-infrared fluorescence probes (NIFPs) with immunoassay. Near-infrared fluorescent probes have small background interference and strong tissue penetration. NIFPs have attracted more and more attention in recent years (As shown in Table 1). Due to the limited sensitivity of labeled probes based on color signals such as colloidal gold, enzymes and electrochemical signal generation probes are expensive and cumbersome to operate, and it is difficult to achieve one-step detection. NIFPs have become one of the most popular signal molecules. These probes are widely used in various bioanalytical fields [22]. NIFPs with emission spectra in the near-infrared region (wavelength 650–900 nm), which attracts attention in the field of analysis owing to their high signal-to-noise ratio and detection sensitivity. The basic chemical structures of near infrared fluorescent (NIRF) dyes are shown in Figure 1.
First, the organisms rarely self-fluoresce in the near-infrared region, so the analysis based on NIFP labeling is protected from background fluorescence. Second, the intensity of the scattered light is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the wavelength, so NIFPs with emitted light in the long-wave region are less affected by its interference. NIFPs have strong penetrability and small damage to biological tissues, which has been widely used in non-destructive testing and bio-imaging [22,23].

2.1. Near-Infrared Fluorescent Material

Although new forms of NIFPs are being synthesized, NIFPs mainly include traditional organic fluorescent dyes such as cyanine, rhodamine, and other thiazine dyes and oxazine dyes. They are widely developed as NIFPs, in which cyanine dyes are most favored for good biocompatibility. Cyanine dye-labeled biological samples mainly have non-covalent, covalent forms of electrostatic/hydrophobic interactions and bioconjugates with some biomolecules through reactive groups for labeling nucleic acids, proteins, immunoassays and bioimaging. Many studies have been focused on how to modify and redesign NIR probes to overcome their limitations.

2.1.1. Cyanine

The cyanine dyes in the near-infrared region mainly include pentamethine and heptamethine cyanine dyes. Cyanine dyes display poor photostability and are prone to photooxidative bleaching. The photooxidation of cyanine dyes has the following characteristics such as the photooxidation reaction in solution conforms to the first-order reaction kinetics; when the structure of the methine chain in the cyanine dye is the same, the substitution of heteroatoms on the heteronuclear core increases, and the stability decreases (indole > oxazole > thiazole > selenazole). When the heteronuclear core structure is the same, the longer the hemi-chain, the worse the photostability. That is very important for the design of near-infrared cyanine dyes with good light stability. Cyanine dye-labeled biological samples mainly have non-covalent, covalent forms of electrostatic/hydrophobic interactions and bioconjugates with some biomolecules through reactive groups for labeling nucleic acids, proteins, immunoassays, and bio-imaging [24]. Among them, thiazole orange, oxazole orange dimer and monomer are mainly used for DNA analysis. These fluorescent probes have weak fluorescence, and the fluorescence is markedly enhanced after labeling DNA. The cyanine dyes feature good optical properties such as high absorption and long absorption/emission wavelength. Hemi-cyanine dyes and their analogues have been used for NIRF platforms in in vivo imaging [25].
There is less literature on the direct detection of non-covalently labeled proteins with near-infrared cyanine dyes. It has been reported that direct measurement of protein by fluorescence detection may result in higher sensitivity than hemimethine cyanine absorption spectrophotometry [26] (as shown in Table 2). In the presence of protein polyglutamate, some researchers measured the fluorescence of the protein. The detection limits of bovine serum albumin (BSA), Human Serum Albumin (HAS) and C-IgG were 37, 40, 43 ng/mL, respectively [26]. These methods were applied to serum samples and researchers had found that the test results were satisfactory. Some solvent-sensitive merocyanines are also covalently bound to proteins for studying changes in protein conformation in living cells. Capillary electrophoresis was used as a separation method to detect the fluorescence and electrophoretic behavior of non-covalent binding of squaraine NN127(III), NN525(IV) and SQ-3(V) to proteins [27]. Fluorescence detection in the near-infrared region is more suitable for bio-tissue analysis than in the visible region. Light penetration into tissue is the basis for optical imaging of living tissue. The depth of this light penetration is closely related to the wavelength of light. With the wavelength of light greater than 600 nm, the depth of the light-permeable tissue can reach several centimeters, so that a relatively large volume of tissue can be imaged for disease diagnosis. The most widely used in biological tissue imaging is indocyanine green (XII), which is mostly used for fluoroscopy of clinical living tissues. In recent years, it has been tested as an animal and human cancer tissue. Some other cyanines are also used for the detection of cancer in vivo.
At present, many cyanines ave been commercialized. For examples, Hirayama and his colleagues have combined a NIR cyanine dye with a sulfur-rich receptor [28]. This modle show a selective and sensitive turn-on response to Cu+ in living cell. Lee et al. further improved and derivatized it by DOFLA (diversity-oriented fluorescence library approach) [29]. They obtained more than 40 NIFPs with excellent physicochemical properties. The light stability of AZA396 was 60 times higher than that of Bodipy Fl. Researchers are constantly working on the synthesis of novel near-infrared organic probes, as well as improvements in key traits such as water solubility, quantum yield, chemical and photostability, and biocompatibility of traditional near-infrared fluorescent dyes [30]. Aggregation of dyes or dye combinations can cause severe fluorescence quenching and many studies have focused on improving the water solubility of dyes [31]. Since it was first discovered and reported by Waggoner et al. in 1993, the attachment of sulfonate groups to the aromatic ring has been effective in increasing the water solubility of NIFPs [32]. This conclusion was also confirmed by Cheng et al. [33]. The well-known commercialized near-infrared organic molecules Cy5.5 and Cy7 from Amersham Biosciences are all sulfonate phthalocyanine dye structures. Its extension of the nitrogen-containing heterocycles leads to a red shift by 20 nm. The elongation of the middle polymethine by the vinylene bond (CH=CH) results in a red shift by 100 nm [34].
In order to effectively increase the fluorescence intensity of dyes to determine trace target analytes, researchers continue to explore efficient signal amplification strategies. For example, a large amount of fluorescent dye is wrapped in nanoparticles to form a near-infrared nanoparticle probe with higher fluorescence intensity. This has been widely confirmed to effectively improve the detection signal intensity while improving the chemical and photostability of the labeled molecule [35]. Furthermore, based on the surface plasmon resonance of the metal nanostructure, the fluorescence intensity of the near-infrared fluorescent dye can also be significantly improved. As studies have shown, by using rough metal surfaces such as silver island films or gold nano-shells, the signal intensity of phthalocyanine green can be increased by 20 and 50 times respectively [36,37]. In addition, coating the nano-microspheres with a multi-polymer material coated with a near-infrared fluorescent dye has been indicated to improve the biocompatibility of the dye. Kim et al. have improved the compatibility of dyes with cells by encapsulating Cy5.5 in a hydrophilic polymer. NIFP could be used to monitor the imaging changes of cell structure in early stage of apoptosis [38].

2.1.2. Near-Infrared Fluorescent Dye Containing Tetrapyrrole-Based Groups

Tetrapyrrole group-containing dyes such as porphyrins and phthalocyanines are very important class of NIFPs. Scholars have applied porphyrin probes to the structure, properties and functions of biological macromolecules such as DNA and proteins [39]. Small porphyrin molecules act on them and their properties and structural changes are determined by spectroscopic techniques such as fluorescence and phosphorescence. The fluorescence spectrum of phthalocyanine is located at 600–700 nm. Compared with porphyrin, phthalocyanine has good stability to light, oxygen and heat. Water-soluble phthalocyanines are increasingly used in biochemical analysis for their unique absorption and fluorescence properties.
Chen et al. used tetraamine aluminum phthalocyanine as the red region fluorescent substrate to establish a fluorescence analysis method for the determination of peroxidase and hydrogen peroxide [40]. Some research group used tetrasulfonate aluminum phthalocyanine as a fluorescent probe to establish a method for the continuous determination of serum protein, albumin and globulin. They studied interaction between phthalocyanine and bovine serum albumin [40]. Some researchers have combined the fluorescent probes of tetrapyrrole with some biomolecules to form bioconjugates in the diagnosis of tissue bioimaging. These biomolecules include antibodies, antibody fragments, peptides, serum proteins and estrogens to improve selectivity. These derivatives have great potential in the treatment of cancer. Karunakaran et al. have developed a hydrophilic porphyrin (THPP) and its derivative (Zn-THPP). They displayed superior quantum yield and excellent free radical generation rates [41]. In comparison with the clinical drug Photofrin, THPP exhibited higher photodynamic activity. Moreover, THPP rapidly permeated into cells and localized in the nucleus, demonstrating its potential application as a NIR probe for PDT as well as nucleus imaging. The low solubility and big size of phthalocyanine dyes affect other properties of biomolecules, which limits their wider application in bioanalysis.

2.1.3. Xanthene Fluorescent Dye

Xanthene fluorescent dyes mainly include two classical fluorescent dyes, fluorescein and rhodamine. Naphthalene ring fluorescein is in the near infrared spectral region. Some near-infrared rhodamine fluorescent dyes such as Rhodamine 800 (IX) and Texas Red (X) are used in bioanalysis [42]. Rhodamine 800 has performed fluorescence polarization tracing on chicken tissue and has also been used to study mouse mitochondrial membrane potential. However, these fluorescent probes from classical rhodamine dyes can only emit visible light at wavelengths of 500–600 nm, and these probes can not be used in biological imaging. Their fluorescent properties can be altered by a ring open/close process or photo-induced electron transfer (PET) [43,44]. These Rhodamine dyes have great molar extinction coefficients and resistance in photobleaching such as PET, oxidation-reduction, and spiro ring opening of xanthenes [34]. Texas Red also has some applications in bioanalysis. Molecular Probes Inc. of the United States has introduced a series of Alex Fluoro’s xanthene-like fluorescent probes with wavelengths ranging from the visible region to the near-infrared region [45]. Because these Alex Fluoro fluorescent probes contain a sulfonic acid group, they are water soluble and suitable for labeling and analysis of biological samples. In addition, the introduction of a sulfonic acid group increases the polarity of the molecule and reduces its aggregation in water.
A small Stokes’ displacement may result in back scattering from biological samples and self-quenching. Gong and colleagues had expend a p-conjugated system of xanthene to develop an efficient NIR fluorophore [46]. The fluorphore has a large Stokes’ displacement and high fluorescence quantum yield.

2.1.4. Thiazine and Oxazine Near-Infrared Fluorescent Dyes

Both thiazine dyes and oxazine dyes contain amino groups which can be used for labeling. Currently, these dyes are mainly Nile Blue (XI), Nile Red, Methylene Blue (XII) and Oxazine 750. Nile Blue (XI) derivative is used for HPLC-LIF analysis of carboxylic acid, the detection limit can reach 3.98 × 10−11 mol/L, the detection limit of aromatic acid in plasma is 7.33 × 10−11 mol/L [47]. The thiazide and oxazine-based near-infrared fluorescent probes have advantages of easier synthesis and smaller molecules, but their fluorescence quantum yield is low, which limits their application.

2.1.5. Boron Difluoride-Dipyrromethane (BODIPY) Class

The boron difluoride-dipyrromethane (BODIPY) fluorescent dye has a high molar absorptivity (E > 80,000 L·moL−1·cm−1), a high fluorescence quantum yield. Its fluorescence is not sensitive to the polarity of the solvent, pH, narrow fluorescence peaks, long fluorescence lifetime and good light stability. A styryl group was introduced at the 3 position of the dye precursor, and two phenyl groups (XV) were introduced at the 1st and 3rd positions to synthesize two long-wavelength fluorescent dyes having a wavelength exceeding 600 nm [48]. The ortho-benzene dicarbonyl compound is used as a raw material, and reacts with hydroxylamine to form an isodecadiene compound, which is then complexed with boron trifluoride to form a BODIPY of a large conjugated system [49]. The maximum emission wavelength of such fluorescent dyes exceeds even 700 nm. In 2005, some BODIPY containing different active functional groups have also been synthesized, such as active esters and carboxylic acids [50].
Currently, some studies adopt two main strategies to shift BODIPY into NIRF dyes, modify the phenyl rings and merge the 3- and 5-phenyl rings with the aza-BODIPY core, which forms six-membered rings and reduces the torsion angles formed by peripheral phenyl groups and the central core [49,51]. Enhancement of co-planarity between phenyls and the central core results in NIR batho-chromic shifts, probably due to electron delocalization. Yang’s group has developed bromo-substituted BODIPY-containing thienopyrrole moieties. They found exposure of these products in the NIR region exhibited a high singlet oxygen quantum yield that leads to photo cytotoxicity [52].

2.2. Near-Infrared Fluorescent Quantum Dot

Quantum dots (QDs) known as semiconductor nano-microcrystals, have been widely used in bioanalysis and medical diagnostics recently as a new class of fluorescent probes due to their excellent optical properties [53]. The fluorescence emission spectrum of this probe with adjustable particle size and composition ensures its feasibility as a near-infrared labeled probe. Near-infrared quantum dots refer to quantum dots with emission wavelengths between 650 and 900 nm, and have the dual characteristics of near-infrared and quantum dots. Compared with traditional organic fluorescent dyes, QDs exhibit high quantum yield, large Stokes’ shifts and can endure photobleaching [54]. As an emerging biological probe, applications of quantum dots are still expanding in scope. However, this cannot replace the traditional organic small molecule fluorescent probe, and can only be used as a powerful supplement to the existing organic small molecule fluorescent probe.
However, biocompatibility remains to be further explored because of its potential toxicity to living tissue. In order to solve the potential acute and chronic toxicity of NIR quantum dots, a less toxic coating is often considered in the design of QDs [55,56]. Currently, quantum dot-based chromatographic test strips have been widely used in food safety, environmental monitoring, medical diagnosis and other fields [57,58,59,60]. However, studies on the preparation of dual-function quantum dot (QD) fluorescent probes with dual-targeting action are rare. Cui et al. prepared a dual-targeting CdTe/CdS QD fluorescent probe with a bovine serum albumin–glycyrrhetinic acid conjugate and arginine-glycine-aspartic acid successfully [61]. This probe could induce the apoptosis of liver cancer cells and showed enhanced targeting in vitro cell imaging.

2.3. Near-Infrared Fluorescent Rare Earth Complex

Complexes of rare earth elements (lanthanides) containing Nd3+, Er3+, Yb3+ and Tm3+ in the near-infrared region have been widely developed in recent years [62,63,64,65]. Compared to NIFPs such as organic dyes and semiconductor nanocrystals, Near-infrared fluorescent rare earth complexes have unique advantages such as large Stokes’ displacement, long fluorescence lifetime and no photobleaching [66]. Due to the low extinction coefficient, the use of free lanthanides is often hindered. Therefore, researchers need a photon converter to process the vibrational overtone spectrum induced by -OH, -NH and –CH [67]. In order to overcome the difficulties, many researchers are committed to the further optimization of NIF lanthanides. For example, Foucault-Collet et al. developed unique NIF rare earth metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) that encapsulate a large number of NIF-emitting Yb3+ ions with the sensitizer phenylenevinylene dicarboxylate (PVDC) in a small volume [68]. This structure not only provides a new method for sensitization and protection of lanthanides, but also greatly improves the detection sensitivity due to the increase in the number of probes carried per unit volume. In addition, incorporation of rare earth elements into laser materials or nanocrystals has also been shown to effectively improve their optical properties [69,70].
The rare earth complex luminescent probe mainly comprises a complex fluorescent probe of Eu3+ and Tb3+. Its Stoke’s displacement is large and the fluorescence lifetime can reach milliseconds, so it is widely used in biotechnology and time-resolved fluorescence detection technology. The main emission peak of Tb3+ is around 550 nm, while the main emission peak of Eu3+ is around 620 nm. Rare earth complex fluorescent probes are sensitive to external environmental pH and coexisting ions such as alkali metal ions and halogen ions. Therefore, they are often used in chemical and biological sensors. The detection limit of lecithin was determined by direct fluorescence spectrophotometry with Eu3+-tetracycline complex to reach 3.9 × 10−8 mol·L−1, and it was successfully used for the determination of lecithin in serum samples [71]. This complex is also used to detect nicotine dinucleotide adenine. The sensitivity of the Eu3+- oxytetracycline complex for detection of adenosine triphosphate can reach 2.67 × 10−9 mol·L−1 [72]. The complex of Eu3+ is also used for sensitive detection of nucleic acids. In the system of Eu3+-benzoylacetone-hexadecy lammonium bromide, the presence of nucleic acid enhances fluorescence, so this system is used to detect the sperm DNA of black carp. The detection limits of calf thymus DNA and yeast RNA were 0.33, 0.21 and 0.99 ng·mL−1 respectively [73]. Rare earth complex fluorescent probes have also been reported for cancer detection in vivo [74]. A Eu3+ complex is also synthesized and used for staining and labeling of the nucleus and exhibits highly selective labeling of the nucleus.

2.4. Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes

As a new type of carbon material, single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) have great potential for application in the biomedical field due to their special nanostructures and excellent optical, mechanical, electrical and magnetic properties [75]. More and more researchers are beginning to pay attention to SWCNTs [70]. SWCNTs are photoluminescence with an emission spectrum greater than 1000 nm. It is an ideal near-infrared fluorescent material. Compared with other probe molecules, it has the following advantages. First, because SWCNTs have strong emissions in the near-infrared region of 1000–1400 nm and the Stokes’ displacement is large, their interference with autofluorescence is significantly reduced compared with other fluorescent probes [76]. Secondly, SWCNTs are extremely short. Fluorescence lifetime (t < 2 ns) can effectively eliminate non-radiative deactivation, which makes the fluorescent probes have high fluorescence quantum yield. In addition, the fluorescence emitted by SWCNTs is highly resistant to photobleaching and has good stability.
Due to its high quantum yield, small background interference, and good light stability, SWCNTs have been widely used in recent years as ideal NIFPs for in vivo and in vitro bio-imaging, and immunoassays for important diagnostic and therapeutic marker molecules [77,78].

3. Applications of Near-Infrared Fluorescence Immunoassay

3.1. Antibiotic Test

In 2016, Chen et al. developed a multiple lateral flow immunoassay based on NIR by combining near-infrared labeling with broad-spectrum-specific monoclonal antibody/receptor as a detection complex. The method could simultaneously detect four antibiotic families in milk such as β-lactams, tetracyclines, quinolones and sulfonamides within 20 min [79].

3.2. Medical Diagnostic Marker Molecular Detection

Compared with a few NIR immunoassays for antibiotic tests, this method is more widely used in immunoassays of important marker molecules in diagnostics. So far, NIFPs have been successfully developed for immunotiter plates, fiber-optic immunosensors, and capillary blotting, capillary electrophoresis immunoassays and immunochromatographic assays [80,81,82]. A variety of different immunoassay models such as strips are used to detect key proteins for medical diagnosis [83].
In the early 1990s, NIFPs were first applied in immunoassays. Researchers achieved quantitative determination of human immunoglobulin by adding an excess of NIR-labeled antibody and subsequent fluorescence detection in an antigen-coated polyethylene microtiter plate [84]. Daneshvar et al. designed and developed a fluorescent fiber-optic immunosenseor (FFOI) for near-infrared labeling of human IgG [80]. An antibody is immobilized on the sensing end of FFOI for the identification and capture of trace specific antigens. The immune mode is sandwich type, which can be completed within 10–15 min with a detection limit of 10 ng/mL. In a follow-up study, the Dye1 used in the above studies was replaced by a water-soluble NIR dye. The FFOI system was further confirmed to efficiently quantify human IgG and effectively sensitize one order of magnitude, while FFOI can also be used in the detection of Legionella pneumophila [85]. The detection sensitivity of the FFOI system is comparable to that of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and it has many advantages such as short operative time, low detection cost and suitable for on-site detection. It was found that HITCI and BSA combined with enhanced fluorescence. HITCI (VI) non-covalently binds to bovine serum albumin BSA, and its fluorescence properties and labeling behavior were detected by CE-LIF (Capillary electrophoresis-laser-induced fluorescence).
Weissleder et al. used a biological conjugate of active protease-near-infrared cyanine to detect cancer. Many cancers overexpress some small peptide receptors (Receptors), such as Somatostain [86] Folate receptors are also specifically expressed by many cancers, so cyanine-folate conjugates are also used for detection of cancer. The cyanine dye can be detected by binding a reactive reactive group to an antibody or antigen protein to form a dye-protein conjugate. In 1997, Williams et al. attempted a near-infrared fluorescence immunoassay on a nitrocellulose membrane for the first time, opening the first step in the use of near-infrared fluorescent probes for solid-phase immunoassays [87]. Williams and Peralta used heptamethine cyanine dyes for solid-phase immunoassays to measure trace amounts of human immunoglobulin. Immunological reactions were performed with fluorescent probe-labeled GAHG (goat anti-human immunoglobulins) and human immunoglobulin. Because the hydroxyl group produced by the peroxide from hydrogen peroxide quenches the fluorescence, it can be used to detect the activity of the enzyme. CEIA (capillary electrophoresis-based immunoassay) is an analytical method for separation and detection by capillary electrophoresis using the differences in electrophoretic behavior between antigen-antibody complexes and free antigens and antibodies. This effectively simplifies the detection procedure, but its practical application is still hindered by the large interference of the scattered light emitted by the membrane matrix, the non-specific binding of the membrane, and the difficulty of matching with the microtiter plate immunoassay. In a subsequent study, the aforementioned heptamethine cyanine dye NN382 was effectively reduced by using a water-soluble, negatively charged sulfonate group to effectively reduce the non-specific binding of the same negatively charged membrane matrix to the dye-antibody complex. The trouble has been effectively solved and the development of solid phase NIFIAs has been promoted. Since then, Zhao et al. developed a solid-phase near-infrared immunofluorescence assay called capillary imprinting, which can be used for direct detection of peptides in complex biological fluid matrices [88]. This method increases the detection sensitivity of the target analyte dynorphin by a factor of 1000 compared to commercial hybridization plates.
In addition, Silva et al. developed an optical immunosensor based on the near-infrared dye Cy5 for the determination of disease infection in sheep Brucella sp., which can achieve a Brucella sp. antibody in serum of sick sheep (0.005–0.11 mg/mL) quantitative analysis [89]. According to the difference in electrophoretic behavior between antigen-antibody complexes and free antigens and antibodies, Cy5 was also used for a capillary electrophoresis immunoassay of IgA secreted in human saliva. The Cy5 labeling assay for immunoglobulin A secreted in human saliva has also been reported. The separation of antigen-antibody complexes and free antigens is best using a boric acid buffer solution containing 150 mmol·L−1 boric acid and 1% CHAPS PH 8.5. It was used for normal human and patient saliva sample determination. MeCy5-OSu(VII) is a newly synthesized cyanine dye near-infrared fluorescent labeling reagent. With biopolyamine as the analysis object, a new method for capillary biophoresis/laser induced fluorescence detection of biopolyamines was established. The linear range is 10–200 nmol·L−1, the detection limit is 0.8–3.0 nmol·L−1. This method has been used for the determination of biopolyamines in red blood cells of normal human and bladder cancer patients.
In recent years, novel NIFPs other than organic fluorescent dyes have also been introduced into near-infrared fluorescent immunoassay systems. For example, Deng et al. prepared a novel core/shell NIF nanoparticle by encapsulating the inexpensive near-infrared fluorescent dye methylene blue in a hydrophobic silica gel shell [90]. The immunoglobulin was used to determine the alpha fetus in the whole blood sample. protein. This special structure exhibits higher fluorescence intensity and better stability than conventional dye-coated silicon nanoparticles, thereby preventing interference from dye leakage and exogenous quenching factors. In addition, dual stabilizer-modified CdTe, CdTe/CdS core (thin)/shell (thick) and CdTe and CdSeTe/CdS/ZnS with mercaptopropionic acid as stabilizers quantum dot near-infrared electrochemiluminescence immunosensors have also been developed for the detection of fetal protein antigens, human IgG and carcinoembryonic antigens respectively [91,92,93]. The above system utilizes a near-infrared fluorescence resonance energy transfer system to measure the distance effect caused by the immune reaction between a near-infrared quantum dot-labeled protein and another probe (such as gold particles), and the fluorescence is caused by the induced energy transfer. The change in intensity enables high-sensitivity quantitative detection of target analytes. In addition to NIR-QDs, the emerging NIR fluorescent material SWCNTs (single-walled carbon nanotubes) have also been used in IgG immunoassays by Iizumi et al. [78]. By detecting co-immunoprecipitation between IgG-bound SWCNTs and immunomagnetic beads linked to protein G, the system can measure target analytes at concentrations as low as 600 pmol/L.
The lanthanide ion represented by lanthanum can emit fluorescence under specific excitation light, and has been developed into a novel fluorescent labeling probe for ICTSs in recent years. Because of its unique emission half-life longer than other fluorescent probes and background materials, lanthanides have been well developed as powerful labeling probes for time-resolved immunofluorometric assays. By delaying the measurement time, after all short-lived background fluorescence and excitation photons are completely decayed and then measuring the fluorescence signal of the lanthanide ions, the background interference can be effectively reduced or even eliminated, thereby improving the detection sensitivity by at least two orders of magnitude. According to Xia et al. and Zhang et al., the detection limits of ICTSs labeled with ruthenium nanoparticles are up to 100-fold relative to colloidal gold-labeled chromatographic strips and ELISA [94,95]. In addition, the marker has a large Stokes’ displacement, which can effectively distinguish the excitation spectrum and the long-wavelength emission spectrum, which not only reduces the requirements on the filter system, but also effectively eliminates background fluorescence interference [96]. Fluorescence of many different colors can be obtained by changing the species of lanthanide ions, making the probe suitable for multivariate detection. For example, on the surface of silica nanoparticles, Eu3+ and Tb3+ were covalently labeled for double labeling. Xu et al successfully detected the simultaneous detection of hepatitis B virus surface antigen and e antigen. In addition, the lanthanide ion-coated nanoparticles prepared in this study are highly stable and can be stored for up to two years [97].
One of the early pathological markers of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the deposition of amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques in the brain. Optical imaging and particularly NIRF imaging has become a safe, low-cost, real-time and widely available technique that provides an attractive method for in vivo detection of Aβ plaques in many different imaging techniques. In 2015, Tong et al. briefly outlined the latest developments in NIRF Aβ probes and their applications in vitro and in vivo [98].
Researchers synthesized a specific COX-2 probe celecoxib-MPA probe (CMP), based on celecoxib and a water-soluble near-infrared dye dye ICG-Der-02 (MPA) for monitoring COX-2. The results suggested that the probe CMP, with favorable hydrophilic property, good biocompatibility, long-term observation, excellent targeting ability and optical imaging capability, and it could serve as a promising probe for real-time monitoring of COX-2 in inflammation and tumor [99].
Despite their high sensitivity, NIFPs in immunoassays are still lacking in simplicity, so its user friendliness needs further improvement. To overcome this shortcoming, Swanson and D Andrea developed quantitative immunochromatographic test strips (ICTSs) based on NIFPs for single and multiple-synchronous detection of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein. In 2013, Swanson developed a quantitative ICTSs based on a near-infrared fluorescent probe. The NIR dye was coupled to the selected antibody and integrated into the LFA. The test strip can detect single and multiple simultaneous detection of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein [83]. The high signal-to-noise ratio of NIFPs makes the detection limit of the test strip as low as pg/mL. That is equivalent to ELISA. In summary, NIR-labeled ICTSs provide a powerful tool for the evaluation of biomarker proteins in a real-time assay environment.

3.3. Applications in Microorganisms

Although current in vitro and in vivo bio-imaging is still the main application field of NIFPs, its application in immunoassays has not stopped over many years since Boyer first researched it in 1992 [84]. With continuous exploration of new NIFPs and continuous development of immunoassay technology, the combination of both has become increasingly popular in many analytical fields. LFA is the most powerful immunoassay for immediate testing due to its simple operation and portability. The application of NIFPs in LFA will undoubtedly provide a valuable platform on-site, high-sensitivity bioanalysis in future.
In 2013, Cheng et al. extracted the anti-pulmonary Legionella LP antigen to prepare immunofluorescent LP antibody kit, and explored application value of near-infrared fluorescence detection of Legionella pneumophila (LP) antigen [100]. It was found that this method is not related to other common bacteria. Cross-reactivity occurs with a minimum of 10 ng/ml, with good stability and repeatability. In recent years, some scholars have combined near-infrared technology with the immunomagnetic bead coupling method for quantitative detection. Zhou et al. labeled the monoclonal antibody targeting larabinomannan (LAM) with a near-infrared fluorescent dye, and the LAM method for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis by targeting the multi-antibody of LAM coated on the surface of the nanomagnetic beads [101]. They used a double antibody sandwich method to magnetically separate the conjugate and the free substance, and then used a portable near-infrared fluorescence detector to detect the fluorescence intensity of the magnetic conjugate, thereby detecting the LAM content in the sample to be tested, and found that the minimum detection limit of the method was 0.5 ng/mL. In 2018, Lin Chen et al. developed a new LFA based on NIR fluorescent dyes to detect anti-dengue virus (DENV1) IgG antibodies. The results of NIR-LFA were compared to those of Panbio Dengue IgG ELISA and the Dengue Duo IgM/IgG Kit. They identified 19 confirmed DENV1 positive samples by NIR-LFA with 95% sensitivity [102].

3.4. Our Team’s Research on Near-Infrared Fluorescence Immunoassay

Foodborne pathogens are one of the most important threat factors for food poisoning incidents worldwide. However, traditional microbial culture-based assays are time-consuming and labor-intensive, failing to provide timely data to effectively reduce the incidence of foodborne illness. Therefore, whether it is from the control of product quality by food companies, or the government’s effective supervision of food safety, so as to protect public health, we urgently need a faster and independent method for detecting food-borne pathogenic microorganisms. Although current colloidal gold-based LFA are still the gold standard for rapid detection of pathogens, the labeling technique is still limited by its low sensitivity and inability to accurately quantify defects. Fluorescent probes are methods that use optical properties of fluorescent molecules to study some of the physical, chemical, and physical properties of a particular environmental material at the molecular level. It has high sensitivity and wide dynamic response range, so it is widely used in biological macromolecules. In the near-infrared region, biomolecules have weak self-fluorescence and small background interference, and high sensitivity is obtained in this region. Therefore, the research of NIFPs has become a research hotspot in recent years, showing great potential in biological analysis.
At present, our team has developed an approach for detecting pathogens such as Salmonella, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio cholerae and Listeria monocytogenes by near-infrared immunoassay (as shown in Table 3). In 2017, we used near infrared fluorescent marker of Vibrio parahaemolyticus monoclonal antibody, Vibrio parahaemolyticus polyclonal antibody and goat anti mouse IgG polyclonal antibody was coated on nitrocellulose membrane as the detection line and the control line. We have developed the detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus near infrared later flow assay strips and supported the standard substance. The results showed that the near infrared spectroscopy technique has good specificity and high sensitivity for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, the lowest detection limit is 1.2 × 102 CFU/mL. There was no cross-reaction with Salmonella, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes. Compared with the traditional detection method, the detection time of near infrared fluorescence method is the shortest, and the detection limit is close to that of RT-PCR .his near infrared immunochromatographic method is ompleted in 45 min. It could be used for efficient detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in food and provide reliable technical support for food safety supervision.

4. Conclusions and Prospects

At present, near-infrared spectroscopy technology has developed with the development of different fields such as computer science, chemometrics, photomaterial science and measuring instruments, and has become a widely used analytical tool to solve some difficulties in quick detection challenges. This technology requires qualitative and quantitative analysis of unknown samples by establishing a calibration model. Because the absorption spectrum is a superposition of the absorption spectra of the contained compounds, and the map has a certain similarity, the map is complicated and difficult to resolve. The further popularization of near-infrared spectroscopy in the field of detection will be a great challenge. Therefore, near-infrared spectroscopy technology needs to be combined with characteristics of actual detection to develop near-infrared spectroscopy special information for each system and the processing technology of other disciplines, so that it can be better applied. With the development of NIR analysis technology and other fields of technology and the continuous expansion of its application, it will play an important role in the modernization of analytical tools.
Since labeled molecules play a decisive role in the development of immunochromatography technology platforms, it is particularly important to develop ideal probes with high quantum yield, good stability, small background interference and easy labeling. The existing probe development mostly relies on simplicity to obtain high sensitivity and accuracy, which to some extent undermines the superiority of ICTSs in the field and in real-time detection. Therefore, more innovative research should be devoted to the development of highly accurate probes. At present the near-infrared fluorescent probe has excellent potential, but it is mainly used for biological imaging research, and the application on the ICTSs is almost blank. Previous studies have shown that near-infrared fluorescent probe labels are 100 times more effective than traditional colloidal gold test strips in detecting human immuno-deficiency virus (HIV).
In recent years, our team has developed a method for detecting pathogens including Salmonella, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio cholerae and Listeria monocytogenes by near-infrared immunoassay (as shown in Table 3). Our test strip is made up of five parts, including a Bottom plate, a sample pad, a conjugate pad, an antibody carrying membrane and an absorbent pad. As shown in Figure 2, the sample pad, conjugate pad, antibody-carrying membrane and absorbent pad were located in turn along the length direction of the Bottom plate, and overlap each other. The antibody-carrying membrane is located in the center of the base plate, which is provided with spaced apart test and control lines, test lines close to the bond pads, and control lines near the absorbent pads. The conjugate pad is sprayed by rat anti-Vibrio Parahemolyticus monoclonal antibody, test line marks rat anti-Vibrio Parahemolyticus polyclonal antibody, and control line marks Goat anti-mouse IgG polyclonal antibody. The emission wavelength of low noise excitation fluorescence dye is 650–1000nm. A kind of fluorescent molecules DyLight800 which excitation and emission wavelength are 777 and 790 nm is used. The control lines and test lines are arranged in parallel, and the line spacing between test lines and control lines is 0.5 cm.
Our team is working on foodborne viruses such as rotavirus, norovirus and hepatitis A virus, and we could develop near-infrared ICTSs using NIFPs-labeled antibodies to detect these foodborne viruses. Our team intends to establish a new platform which has a highly sensitive near infrared probe combined with portable and simple ICTSs for rapid detection of food borne viruses. This will provide technical support for a rapid detection on the port.

Author Contributions

Writing—Original Draft Preparation, X.-H.C.; Writing—Review & Editing, X.-H.C.; Visualization, X.-H.C.; Supervision, L.-H.W., X.-Y.Y., X.-L.L., Y.-K.P.; Project Administration, J.Z., J.-C.M., G.-Q.C.; Funding Acquisition, A.-J.M.

Funding

This work was supported by grants No.2018YFC1603804 from the National Key R&D Program of China, Ministry of Science and Technology of PR China; grants No.2017IK157 from the Science and Technology Planning Project of General Administration of Customs of the People’s Republic of China.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Practical Applications

The applications of near-infrared fluorescence probes (NIFPs) in immunological analysis and clinically important biomarkers were also elaborated. Moreover, a NIFPs-based immunoassay adaptable for rapid detection of foodborne pathogens was also forecast. In 2017, our team developed an approach for detecting pathogens such as Salmonella, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio cholerae and Listeria monocytogenes by near-infrared immunoassay.

Abbreviations

NIFPsnear-infrared fluorescence probes
DOFLAdifferent-oriented fluorescence library approach
NIRnear-infared
ICGgoat anti human immunoglobulins
FFOIfluorescent fiber-optic immunosenseor
gahggoat anti human immunoglobulins
CEIACapillary electrophoresis-based immunoasssay
LFAlateral flow assay
ICTSsimmunochromatographic test strips
NIFPsnear-infrared fluorescence probes
LPLegionella pneumophila
SCWNTssingle-walled carbon nanotubes
HSAHuman Serum Albumin
CE-LIFCapillary electrophoresis-laser-induced fluorescence

References

  1. Frangioni, J.V. In vivo near-infrared fluorescence imaging. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2003, 7, 626–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Diao, S.; Hong, G.S.; Antaris, A.L.; Blackburn, J.L.; Chen, K.; Cheng, Z.; Dai, H.J. Biological imaging without autofluorescence in the second near-infared region. Nano Res. 2015, 8, 3027–3034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hong, G.S.; Antaris, A.L.; Dai, H.J. Near-infrared fluorophores for biomedical imaging. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2017, 1, 0010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Reineck, P.; Gibson, B.C. Near-infrared fluorescent nano-materials for bioimaging and sensing. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2017, 5, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, X.-H.; Wang, S. Sensors and Biosensors for Determination of small molecule biological toxins. Sensors 2008, 8, 6045–6054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pyo, D.J.; Yoo, J.S. New trends in fluorescence immunochromatography. J. Immunoass. Immunochem. 2012, 33, 203–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, X. Near-infrared spectroscopy for food quality evaluation. In Evaluation Technologies for Food Quality; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, Cambridge, UK, 2019; pp. 105–118. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hu, Y.Z.; Wang, Y.B.; Zhang, W.S.; Li, W.L.; Dai, Q.R.; Yin, L.Y. Application research on the rapid determination of crude oil density by near-infrared spectroscopy. J. Light Scatter. 2014, 26, 198–202. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cozzolino, D.; Roumeliotis, S.; Eglinton, J. Exploring the Use of Near Infrared (NIR) Reflectance Spectroscopy to Predict Starch Pasting Properties in Whole Grain Barley. Food Biophys. 2013, 8, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vines, L.L.; Kays, S.E.; Koehler, P.E. Near-infrared reflectance model for rapid prediction of total fat in cereal foods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 1550–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rathore, S.S.S.; Paulsen, M.R.; Sharma, V.; Singh, V. Use of near-infrared spectroscopy for monitoring fermentation in a corn dry grind ethanol process. Inf. Electr. Technol. Div. ASABE 2007, 50, 2337–2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Higgins, J.P.; Arrivo, S.M.; Reed, R.A. Approach to the determination of hydrate form conversions of drug compounds and solid dosage forms by near-infrared spectroscopy. J. Pharm. Sci. 2003, 92, 2303–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Liu, H.; Zhao, X.; Qi, T.; Qi, Y.P.; Fan, G.R. Establishment of the model for online monitoring of the column separation and purification process by near-infrared spectroscopy and determination of total ginsenosides in Folium Ginseng. Spectrosc. Spectr. Anal. 2013, 33, 3226–3230. [Google Scholar]
  14. Quirk, B.J.; DeSmet, K.D.; Henry, M.; Buchmann, E.; Wong-Riley, M.; Eells, J.T.; Whelan, H.T. Therapeutic effect of near infrared (NIR) light on Parkinson’s disease models. Front. Biosci. 2012, 4, 818–823. [Google Scholar]
  15. Schrampf, E.; Leitner, E. Prediction of Rheological and Chemical Properties of Different Starches Used in the Paper Industry by Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS). Macromol. Symp. 2010, 296, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Scarff, M.; Arnold, S.A.; Harvey, L.M.; McNeil, B. Near infrared spectroscopy for bioprocess monitoring and control:current status and fure trends. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2006, 26, 17–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Luo, S.; Zhang, E.; Su, Y.; Cheng, T.; Shi, C. A review of NIR dyes in cancer targeting and imaging. Biomaterial 2011, 32, 7127–7138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Pysz, M.A.; Gambhir, S.S.; Willmann, J.K. Molecular imaging: Current status and emerging strategies. Clin. Radiol. 2010, 65, 500–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Krepelka, P.; Drexler, P.; Pytel, R. Fiber Optic Sensor Enhanced by NIR Spectroscopy for Bacteria Identification. Near Infrared Spectroscopy: Proceeding of the International Conference. 2015. Available online: https://proceedings.science/nir/papers/fiber-optic-sensor-enhanced-by-nir-spectroscopy-for-bacteria-identification (accessed on 17 June 2019).
  20. Krepelka, P.; Martos, F.C.; Posada-Izquierdo, G.D. Measuring and Application of NIR Light Absorption Coefficient of Bacteria. In Proceedings of the Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium 2014, Guangzhou, China, 25–28 August 2014; PIERS: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; Volume 9, pp. 2336–2339. [Google Scholar]
  21. Dixit, Y.; Casado-Gavalda, M.P.; Cama-Moncunill, R.; Cama-Moncunill, X.; Markiewicz-Keszycka, M.; Cullen, P.J.; Sullivan, C. Developments and challenges in online NIR Spectroscopy for meat processing. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017, 16, 1172–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alander, J.T.; Bochko, V.; Martinkauppi, B.; Saranwong, S.; Mantere, T. A review of optical nondestructive visual and near-infrared methods for food quality and safety. Int. J. Spectrosc. 2013, 2013, 341402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Guo, Z.Q.; Park, S.; Yoon, J.Y.; Shin, I. Recent progress in the development of near-infrared fluorescent probes for bioimaging applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 16–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sun, W.; Guo, S.; Hu, C.; Fan, J.; Peng, X. Recent development of chemosensors based on cyanine platforms. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 7768–7817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhen, X.; Zhang, J.; Huang, J.; Xie, C.; Miao, Q.; Pu, K. Macrotheranostic probe with disease-activated near-infrared fluorescence, photoacoustic, and photothermal signals for imaging-guided therapy. Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 7930–7934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhu, C.Q.; Wu, Y.Q.; Zheng, H.; Chen, J.L.; Li, D.H.; Li, S.H.; Xu, J.G. Near-Infrared Fluorometric Determination of Protein by Shifting the Ion-Association Equilibrium Between Cationic Heptamethylene Cyanine and Poly-glutamate. Anal. Lett. 2004, 37, 1115–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Welder, F.; Paul, B.; Nakazumi, H.; Yaqi, S.; Colyer, C.L. Symmetric and asymmetric squarylium dyes as noncovalent protein labels: A study by fluorimetry and capillary electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2003, 793, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hirayama, T.; Van de Bittner, G.C.; Gray, L.W.; Lutsenko, S.; Chang, C.J. Near-infrared fluorescent sensor for in vivo copper imaging in a murine Wilson disease model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 2228–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Lee, S.C.; Zhai, D.T.; Mukherjee, P.; Chang, Y.T. The Development of novel near-infrared (NIR) tetraarylazadipyrromethene fluorescent dyes. Materials 2013, 6, 1779–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fu, N.; Wang, H.; Zhang, H. Progress in near-infrared fluorescent probe and its bioanalytical application. J. Anal. Sci. 2008, 24, 233–239. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gruber, H.J.; Hahn, C.D.; Kada, G.; Riener, C.K.; Harms, G.S.; Ahrer, W.; Dax, T.G.; Knaus, H.G. Anomalous fluorescence enhancement of Cy3 and Cy3.5 versus anomalous fluorescence loss of Cy5 and Cy7 upon covalent linking to proteins and noncovalent binding to avidin. Bioconj. Chem. 2000, 11, 696–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Waggoner, A.S.; Ernst, L.A.; Mujumdar, R.B. Method for Labeling and Detecting Materials Employing Arylsulfonate Cyanate Dyes. U.S. Patent 5268486, 1 January 1993. [Google Scholar]
  33. Cheng, Z.; Wu, Z.; Xiong, Z.; Gambhir, S.S.; Chen, X. Near-Infrared fluorescent RGD peptides for optical imaging of integrin avb3 expression in living mice. Bioconj. Chem. 2005, 16, 1433–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yuan, L.; Lin, W.; Zheng, K.; He, L.; Huang, W. Far-red to near infrared analyte-responsive fluorescent probes based on organic fluorophore platforms for fluorescence imaging. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 622–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Christian, N.A.; Milone, M.C.; Ranka, S.S.; Li, G.; Frail, P.R.; Davis, K.P.; Bates, F.S.; Therien, M.J.; Ghoroghchian, P.P.; June, C.H.; et al. Tat-Functionalized Near-Infrared emissive polymersomes for dendritic cell labeling. Bioconj. Chem. 2007, 18, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Malicka, J.; Gryczynski, I.; Geddes, C.D.; Lakowicz, J.R. Metal-enhanced emission from indocyanine green: A new approach to in vivo imaging. J. Biomed. Opt. 2003, 8, 472–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tam, F.; Goodrich, G.P.; Johnson, B.R.; Halas, N.J. Plasmonic enhancement of molecular fluorescence. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 496–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kim, K.; Lee, M.; Park, H.; Kim, S.; Chung, H.; Choi, K.; Kim, I.S.; Seong, B.L.; Kwon, I.C. Cell-Permeable and biocompatible polymeric nanoparticles for apoptosis imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3490–3491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Jiang, J.; Ng, D.K. A decade journey in the chemistry of sandwich-type tetrapyrrolato-rare Earth complexes. ACC Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, X.L.; Li, D.H.; Yang, H.H.; Zhu, Q.Z.; Zheng, H.; Xu, J.G. Study of tetra-substituted amino aluminum phthalocyanine as a new red-region substrate for the fluorometric determination of peroxidase and hydrogen peroxide. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 434, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Karunakaran, S.C.; Babu, P.S.; Madhuri, B.; Marydasan, B.; Paul, A.K.; Nair, A.S.; Rao, K.S.; Srinivasan, A.; Chandrashekar, T.K.; Rao, C.M. In vitro demonstration of apoptosis mediated photodynamic activity and NIR nucleus imaging through a novel porphyrin. ACS Chem. Biol. 2013, 8, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Horneffer, V.; Forsmanna, A.; Strupat, K.; Hillenkamp, F.; Kubitscheck, U. Localization of analyte molecules in MALDI preparations by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 1016–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, T.; Zhao, Q.J.; Hu, H.G.; Yu, S.C.; Liu, X.; Liu, L.; Wu, Q.Y. Spirolactonized Si-rhodamine: A novel NIR fluorophore utilized as a platform to construct Si-rhodamine-based probes. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 8781–8783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, X.; Pradhan, T.; Wang, F.; Kim, J.S.; Yoon, J. Fluorescent chemosensors based on spiroring-opening of xanthenes and related derivatives. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 1910–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Berlier, J.E.; Rothe, A.; Buller, G.; Bradford, J.; Gray, D.R.; Filanoski, B.J.; Telford, W.G.; Yue, S.; Liu, J.; Cheung, C.Y.; et al. Quantitative comparison of long-wavelength Alexa Fluor dyes to Cy dyes: Fluorescence of the dyes and their bioconjugates. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2003, 51, 1699–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gong, Y.-J.; Su, L.; Meng, H.M.; Tan, W.; Feng, S.; Zhang, G. A unique approach toward near-infrared fluorescent probes for bioimaging with remarkably enhanced contrast. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 2275–2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Chen, Q.Y.; Li, D.H.; Yang, H.H.; Zhu, Q.Z.; Xu, J.G.; Zhao, Y. Interaction of a novel red-region fluorescent probe, Nile blue, with DNA and its application to nucleic acids assay. Analyst 1999, 124, 901–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Jiang, X.D.; Gao, R.; Yue, Y.; Sun, G.T.; Zhao, W. A NIR BODIPY dye bearing 3,4,4a-trihydroxanthene moieties. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 6861–6865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zhang, T.; Zhu, X.; Wong, W.K.; Tam, H.L.; Wong, W.Y. Light-harvesting ytterbium(III)-porphyrinate-BODIPY conjugates: Synthesis, excitation-energy transfer, and two-photon-induced near-infrared-emission studies. Chemistry 2013, 19, 739–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Basaric, N.; Baruah, M.; Qin, W.; Metten, B.; Smet, M.; Dehaen, W.; Boens, N. Synthesis and spectroscopic characterisation of BODIPY® based fluorescent off–on indicators with low affinity for calcium. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 2755–2761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Sarma, T.; Panda, P.K.; Setsune, J. Bis-naphthobipyrrolylmethene derived BODIPY complex: An intense near-infrared fluorescent dye. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 9806–9808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yang, Y.; Guo, Q.; Chen, H.; Zhou, Z.; Guo, Z.; Shen, Z. Thienopyrrole-expanded BODIPY as a potential NIR photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 3940–3942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kairdolf, B.A.; Smith, A.M.; Stokes, T.H.; Wang, M.D.; Young, A.N.; Nie, S. Semiconductor quantum dots for bioimaging and biodiagnostic applications. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2013, 6, 143–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lu, Y.; Su, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Peng, F.; Zhong, Y.; Huang, Q.; Fan, C.; He, Y. In vivo behavior of near infrared-emitting quantum dots. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 4302–4308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Helle, M.; Cassette, E.; Bezdetnaya, L.; Pons, T.; Leroux, A.; Plénat, F.; Guillemin, F.; Dubertret, B.; Marchal, F. Visualisation of sentinel lymph node with indium-based near infrared emitting Quantum Dots in a murine metastatic breast cancer model. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Gu, Y.P.; Cui, R.; Zhang, Z.L.; Xie, Z.X.; Pang, D.W. Ultrasmall near-infrared Ag2Se quantum dots with tunable fluorescence for in vivo imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 79–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Berlina, A.N.; Taranova, N.A.; Zherdev, A.V.; Vengerov, Y.Y.; Dzantiev, B.B. Quantum dot-based lateral flow immunoassay for detection of chloramphenicol in milk. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013, 405, 4997–5000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Zou, Z.X.; Dan, D.; Wang, J.; Timchalk, C.; Li, Y.; Lin, Y. Quantum dot-based immunochromatographic fluorescent biosensor for biomonitoring trichloropyridinol, a biomarker of exposure to chlorpyrifos. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 5125–5133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Gui, C.; Wang, K.; Li, C.; Dai, X.; Cui, D. A CCD-based reader combined with CdS quantum dot-labeled lateral flow strips for ultrasensitive quantitative detection of CagA. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Kawabori, M.; Kuroda, S.; Sugiyama, T.; Ito, M.; Shichinohe, H.; Houkin, K.; Kuge, Y.; Tamaki, N. Intracerebral, but not intravenous, transplantation of bone marrow stromal cells enhances functional recovery in rat cerebral infarct: An optical imaging study. Neuropathology 2012, 32, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Cui, H.; Wang, R.; Zhou, Y.; Shu, C.; Song, F.; Zhong, W. Dual-function fluorescent probe for cancer imaging and therapy. Luminescence 2016, 31, 813–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Aita, K.; Temma, T.; Shimizu, Y.; Kuge, Y.; Seki, K.I.; Saji, H. Synthesis of a new NIR fluorescent Nd complex labeling agent. J. Fluoresc. 2010, 20, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yu, C.; Zhang, J.; Wen, L. New transparent Er3+-doped oxyfluoride tellurite glass ceramic with improved near infrared and up-conversion fluorescence properties. Mater. Lett. 2007, 61, 3644–3646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Korovin, Y.V.; Rusakova, N.V.; Popkov, Y.A. Luminescence of ytterbium and neodymium in complexes with bis-macrocyclic ligands. J. Appl. Spectrosc. 2002, 69, 841–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, J.; Petoud, S. Azulene-Moiety-Based ligand for the efficient sensitization of four near-infrared luminescent lanthanide cations: Nd3+, Er3+, Tm3+ and Yb3+. Chemistry 2008, 14, 1264–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Comby, S.; Bünzli, J.-C.G. Lanthanide near-infrared luminescence in moleclular probes and devices. Handb. Phys. Chem. Rare Earths 2007, 37, 217–470. [Google Scholar]
  67. Eliseeva, S.V.; Bünzli, J.-C.G. Lanthanide luminescence for functional materials and bio-sciences. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 189–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Foucault-Collet, A.; Gogick, K.A.; White, K.A.; Villette, S.; Pallier, A.; Collet, G.; Kieda, C.; Li, T.; Geib, S.J.; Rosi, N.L.; et al. Lanthanide near infrared imaging in living cells with Yb 3+ nano metal organic frameworks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 17199–17204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Duan, Z.C.; Zhang, J.J.; He, D.B.; Sun, H.T.; Hu, L.L. Effect of CdF2 addition on thermal stability and upconversion luminescence properties in Tm3+-Yb3+ codoped oxyfluoride silicate glasses. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2006, 100, 400–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wei, Y.; Lu, F.Q.; Zhang, X.R. Synthesis and characterization of efficient near-infrared upconversion Yb and Tm codoped NaYF4 nanaocrystal reporter. J. Alloys Compd. 2007, 427, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, T.; Jiang, C. Spectrofluorimetric determination of lecithin using a tetracycline–europium probe. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 561, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hou, F.; Miao, Y.; Jiang, C. Determination of adenosine disodium triphosphate (ATP) using oxytetracycline–Eu3+ as a fluorescence probe by spectrofluorimetry. Spectrochim. Acta A 2005, 61, 2891–2895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wu, X.; Guo, C.; Yang, J.; Wang, M.; Chen, Y.; Liu, J. The sensitive determination of nucleic acids using fluorescence enhancement of Eu3+-benzoylacetone-cetyltrimethylammonium bromide-nucleic acid system. J. Fluoresc. 2005, 15, 655–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Su, H.Y.; Wang, Z.T.; Liu, G. Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging Probes for Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment. Cancer Theranostics 2014, 5, 55–67. [Google Scholar]
  75. Jain, A.; Homayoun, A.; Bannister, C.W.; Yum, K. Single-walled carbon nanotubes as near-infrared optical biosensors for life sciences and biomedicine. Biotechnol. J. 2015, 10, 447–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. O’Connell, M.J.; Bachilo, S.M.; Huffman, C.B.; Moore, V.C.; Strano, M.S.; Haroz, E.H.; Rialon, K.L.; Boul, P.J.; Noon, W.H.; Kittrell, C.; et al. Band gap fluorescence from individual single-walled carbon nanotubes. Science 2002, 297, 593–596. [Google Scholar]
  77. Tao, H.Q.; Yang, K.; Ma, Z.; Wan, J.; Zhang, Y.; Kang, Z.; Liu, Z. In vivo NIR fluorescence imaging, biodistribution, and toxicology of photoluminescent carbon dots produced from carbon nanotubes and graphite. Small 2012, 8, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Lizumi, Y.; Okazaki, T.; Ikehara, Y.; Ogura, M.; Fukata, S.; Yudasaka, M. Immunoassay with single-walled carbon nanotubes as near-infrared fluorescent labels. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 7665–7670. [Google Scholar]
  79. Chen, Y.Q.; Chen, Q.; Han, M.; Liu, J.; Zhao, P.; He, L.; Zhang, Y.; Niu, Y.; Yang, W.; Zhang, L. Near-infrared fluorescence-based multiplex lateral flow immunoassay for the simultaneous detection of four antibiotic residue families in milk. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 79, 430–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Daneshvar, M.I.; Casay, G.A.; Patonay, G.; Lipowska, M.; Strekowski, L.; Evans, L.; Tarazi, L.; George, A. Design and development of a fiber-optic immunosensor utilizing near-infrared fluorophores. J. Fluoresc. 1996, 6, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhao, X.Y.; Shippy, S.A. Competitive immunoassay for microliter protein samples with magnetic beads and near-infrared fluorescence detection. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 1871–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Liu, C.M.; Tung, K.H.; Chang, T.H.; Chien, C.C.; Yen, M.H. Analysis of secretory immunoglobulin A in human saliva by laser-induced fluorescence capillary electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2003, 791, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Swanson, C.; D’Andrea, A. Lateral flow assay with near-infrared dye for multiplex detection. Clin. Chem. 2013, 59, 641–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Boyer, A.E.; Lipowska, M.; Zen, J.M.; Patonay, G. Evaluation of near infrared dyes as labels for immunoassays utilizing laser diode detection:Development of near infrared dye immunoassay (NIRDIA). Anal. Lett. 1992, 25, 415–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Daneshvar, M.I.; Peralta, J.M.; Casay, G.A.; Narayanan, N.; Evans, L.; Patonay, G.; Strekowski, L. Detection of biomolecules in the near-infrared spectral region via a fiber-optic immunosensor. J. Immunol. Methods 1999, 226, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Shan, G.; Weissleder, R.; Hilderbrand, S.A. Upconverting organic dye doped core-shell nano-composites for dual-modality NIR imaging and photo-thermal therapy. Theranostics 2013, 3, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Williams, R.J.; Peralta, J.M.; Tsang, V.C.; Narayanan, N.; Casay, G.A.; Lipowska, M.; Strekowski, L.; Patonay, G. Near-infrared heptamethine cyanine dyes: A new tracer for solid phase immunoassays. Appl. Spectrosc. 1997, 51, 836–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhao, X.Y.; Kottegoda, S.; Shippy, S.A. Solid-phase immunoassay detection of peptides from complex matrices without a separation. Analyst 2003, 128, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Silva, M.; Cruz, H.; Rossetti, O.; Arese, A.; Oliva, A. Development of an optical immunosensor based on the fluorescence of Cyanine -5 for veterinarian diagnostics. Biotechnol. Lett. 2004, 26, 993–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Deng, T.; Li, J.S.; Jiang, J.H.; Shen, G.-L.; Yu, R.-Q. Preparation of near-IR fluorescent nanoparticles for fluorescence-anisotropy based immunoagglutination assay in whole blood. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2006, 16, 2147–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Liang, G.D.; Liu, S.F.; Zou, G.Z.; Zhang, X. Ultrasensitive immunoassay based on anodic near-infrared electrochemiluminescence from dual-stabilizer-capped CdTe nanocrystals. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 10645–10649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Liang, G.X.; Pan, H.C.; Li, Y.; Jiang, L.P.; Zhang, J.R.; Zhu, J.J. Near infrared sensing based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer between Mn:CdTe quantum dots and Au nanorods. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2009, 24, 3693–3697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Li, L.L.; Chen, Y.; Lu, Q.; Ji, J.; Shen, Y.; Xu, M.; Fei, R.; Yang, G.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, J.R. Electrochemiluminescence energy transfer-promoted ultrasensitive immunoassay using near-infrared-emitting CdSeTe/CdS/ZnS quantum dots and gold nanorods. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Xia, X.H.; Xu, Y.; Ke, R.Q.; Zhang, H.; Zou, M.; Yang, W.; Li, Q. A highly sensitive europium nanopar-ticle-based lateral flow immunoassay for detection of chloramphenicol residue. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013, 405, 7541–7544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhang, F.; Zou, M.Q.; Chen, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Qi, X.; Xue, Q. Lanthanide-labeled immunochromatographic strips for the rapid detection of Pantoea stewartii subsp. Stewartii. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 51, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Handl, H.L.; Gillies, R.J. Lanthanide-based luminescent assyas for ligand-receptor interactions. Life Sci. 2005, 77, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Xu, Y.; Li, Q.G. Multiple Fluorescent labeling of silica nanoparticles with lanthanide chelates for highly sensitive time-resolved immunofluorometric assays. Clin. Chem. 2007, 53, 1503–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Tong, H.Y.; Lou, K.Y.; Wang, W. Near-infrared fluorescent probes for imaging of amyloid plaques in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2015, 5, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Zhang, Q.; Han, Z.; Tao, J.; Zhang, W.; Li, P.; Tang, L.; Gu, Y. A novel near-infrared fluorescent probe for monitoring cyclooxygenase-2 in inflammation and tumor. J. Biophotonics 2018, 11, e201700339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Cheng, Y.; Chen, Y.; Cui, B.N.; Wang, W.; Ren, K.H.; Hou, W.; Ding, X.H.; Jiang, X.H. Application of near infrared fluorescence in detecting legionella pneumophila antigen. Jiangsu Med. J. 2015, 41, 1180–1181. [Google Scholar]
  101. Zhou, Y.R.; Chen, C.; Ming, H.Y.; Wang, X.J.; Zhu, Y.F.; Wang, J. Near infrared fluorescent quantitative immunomagnetic coupling method was used to detect TB-LAM antigen. Chin. J. Health Lab. Technol. 2015, 3646–3648. [Google Scholar]
  102. Chen, L.; Wang, H.; Guo, T.; Xiao, C.; Liu, L.; Zhang, X.; Liu, B.; Li, P.; Li, B.; Mao, Y. A rapid point-of-care test for dengue virus-1 based on a lateral flow assay with a near-infrared fluorescent dye. J. Immunol. Methods 2018, 456, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Basic chemical structure of near infrared fluorescent (NIRF) dyes.
Figure 1. Basic chemical structure of near infrared fluorescent (NIRF) dyes.
Micromachines 10 00422 g001
Figure 2. The structure of low-noise excitation fluorescence detection of Vibrio Parahemolyticus immunochromatographic test dipstick. (1: sample pad; 2: conjugate pad; 3: antibody carrying membrane; 4: test line; 5: control line; 6: absorbent pad; 7: Bottom plate.).
Figure 2. The structure of low-noise excitation fluorescence detection of Vibrio Parahemolyticus immunochromatographic test dipstick. (1: sample pad; 2: conjugate pad; 3: antibody carrying membrane; 4: test line; 5: control line; 6: absorbent pad; 7: Bottom plate.).
Micromachines 10 00422 g002
Table 1. Types and characteristics of near-infrared fluorescent probes.
Table 1. Types and characteristics of near-infrared fluorescent probes.
NIFPs TypesNIFPs (Near-Infrared Fluorescence Probes)NIFPs AdvantagesDisadvantageReference
Near-infrared fluorescent materialAZA396Higher stability than BodipyF1-[29]
Cy5.5, Cy7Water solubility increasedPoor photostability[33]
Near-infrared nanoparticle probeHigher signal intensity, chemical and photostability-[35]
Silver island films resonanceSignal intensity increasedPoor biocompatibility[36]
Gold nano-shells resonanceSignal intensity increasedPoor biocompatibility[37]
Nano-microspheres with a multi-polymer material
p-conjugated system of xanthenes
Rhodamine
Improve the biocompatibility
A large stokes’ displacement
Great molar extinction and resistance in photobleaching
Self-quenching and back scattering[38]
[46]
[52]
Near-infrared fluorescent quantum dotSemiconductor nano-microcrystalsHigh quantum yield, strong anti-photobleaching ability and Concentrated emission spectrumIts potential toxicity to living tissue[53]
Near-infrared fluorescent rare earth complexLanthanides containing Nd3+, Er3+, Yb3+ and Tm3+Large Stoke’s displacement;
Long fluorescence lifetime;
No photobleaching
Low extinction coefficient[62]
[63]
[64]
[65]
MOFsImprove detection sensitivityIts potential toxicity to living tissue[68]
Laser materialsImprove optical properties-[69]
Single-walled carbon nanotubesNanocrystals
SWCNTs
Improve optical properties
High quantum yield, small background interference, good Light stability
-[70]
[78]
Table 2. Applications of near-infrared fluorescence immunoassay.
Table 2. Applications of near-infrared fluorescence immunoassay.
NIFP TypesNIFPsDetection ObjectSampleDetection LimitReference
Near-infrared fluorescent materialQijiachuan cyanine dyeBSA (bovine serum albumin)
HAS (Human Serum Albumin)
C-IgG
Serum
Serum
Serum
37 ng/mL
40 ng/mL
43 ng/mL
[26]
FFOIHuman IgGHuman Serum10 ng/mL[81]
Cy5 optical immunosensorBrucella sp. antibodySick sheep serum0.005–0.11 mg/mL[89]
MeCy5-OSu(VII)BiopolyamineRed blood cells of normal human0.8–3.0 nmol/L[30]
SWCNTsIgGSerum600 pmol/L[78]
NIR-antibody
NIR-antibody
NIR
Interleukin-6/C-reactive protein
LP antigen
LAM
Human sample
Sample
Sample to be tested
pg/mL
10 ng/mL
0.5 ng/mL
[83]
[100]
[101]
Near-infrared fluorescent quantum dotquantum dotchloramphenicol (CAP)PBS0.2 ng/mL[57]
Near-infrared fluorescent rare earth complexLanthanides containing Eu 3+, Yb 3+ and Tm 3+Chloramphenicol residue
Stewart’s bacterial wilt of corn
Milk/PBS
Corn seed
0.03–1 ng/mL
103 cfu/mL
[94]
[95]
Lanthanides containing Eu3+/Yb 3+Hepatitis B virus surface antigen and e antigenPatient serum0.0092 g·L−1/10 NCU·L−1[97]
Table 3. Our team’s overviews of different pathogens near-infrared fluorescence immunoassay.
Table 3. Our team’s overviews of different pathogens near-infrared fluorescence immunoassay.
PathogensLabelAntibodyDetection Limit (CFU/mL)Cross Reaction
SalmonellaDylight800Salmonella monoclonal/polyclonal antibody Goat anti-Rat IgG0.5 × 103no
Vibrio parahaemolyticusDylight800Vibrio parahaemolyticus monoclonal\polyclonal antibody Goat anti-Rat IgG1.2 × 102no
Vibrio choleraeDylight800Rat anti-Vibrio cholerae monoclonal\polyclonal antibodyGoat anti-Rat IgG1.0 × 102no
Listeria monocytogenesDylight800Listeria monocytogenes monoclonal\polyclonal antibody
Goat anti-Rat IgG
5.0 × 102no

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, X.-H.; Zhang, J.; Wu, L.-H.; Peng, Y.-K.; Yang, X.-Y.; Li, X.-L.; Ma, A.-J.; Ma, J.-C.; Chen, G.-Q. Research Progress of Near-Infrared Fluorescence Immunoassay. Micromachines 2019, 10, 422. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10060422

AMA Style

Chang X-H, Zhang J, Wu L-H, Peng Y-K, Yang X-Y, Li X-L, Ma A-J, Ma J-C, Chen G-Q. Research Progress of Near-Infrared Fluorescence Immunoassay. Micromachines. 2019; 10(6):422. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10060422

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Xiao-Hui, Jie Zhang, Lin-Huan Wu, Yan-Kun Peng, Xiang-Ying Yang, Xiao-Lin Li, Ai-Jin Ma, Jun-Cai Ma, and Guang-Quan Chen. 2019. "Research Progress of Near-Infrared Fluorescence Immunoassay" Micromachines 10, no. 6: 422. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10060422

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop