Next Article in Journal
Comparison of Adrenal Tumor Size in Ultrasound Examinations with and without the Use of a Contrast Agent
Previous Article in Journal
Medication Adherence and Its Association with Health Literacy and Performance in Activities of Daily Livings among Elderly Hypertensive Patients in Islamabad, Pakistan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Could Hyperbaric Oxygen Be a Solution in the Treatment of Spinal Infections?

by
Şefika Körpınar
Department of Underwater and Hyperbaric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, 17000 Canakkale, Turkey
Medicina 2019, 55(5), 164; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55050164
Submission received: 11 February 2019 / Revised: 2 April 2019 / Accepted: 16 May 2019 / Published: 20 May 2019

Abstract

:
Background and Objective: Pyogenic spinal infections are rare and potentially devastating, requiring prompt recognition and management. Parallel to the ever-increasing number of invasive spinal procedures, its incidence is on a steady rise, particularly in an expanding elderly population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy in the treatment of this heterogeneous group of disorders. Materials and Methods: Nineteen patients who were referred to our center for HBO2 with a clinical diagnosis of spinal infections (vertebral osteomyelitis, pyogenic spondylitis, spondylodiscitis, surgical site infection following spine surgery, epidural abscess) were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Infection resolution was adequately achieved in 12 of 13 patients (92.3%) on magnetic resonance imaging at the end of HBO2 treatment or during the first month of follow-up. The mean follow-up period was 11 months (range 1 month to 3 years). Conclusions: This study suggests that HBO2 therapy is efficacious in patients with pyogenic spinal infections complicated by primary therapy failure or by medical comorbidities that may impede the eradication of microbial infection and delay wound healing. HBO2 therapy may be useful for reducing long hospital stays, repeated surgeries, and morbidities.

1. Introduction

Spinal infections with involvement of the vertebral body, intervertebral disc, and/or adjacent paraspinal tissue constitute 2–7% of all musculoskeletal system infections [1]. Infection of the vertebral column was first described by Hippocrates, who was regarded as the father of spinal surgery. Until 1779, when Percivall Pott made the first detailed description of tuberculosis infection, which can affect the spine and cause serious damage to the intervertebral discs, little knowledge was added to the basic school of Hippocratic understandings. A century later, Odilon M. Lannelongue described pyogenic osteomyelitis as we recognize it today. With the introduction of new diagnostic methods, therapeutic modalities, and sophisticated instrumentation, the actual progression of pyogenic spinal infections has been recorded over the last century. Parallel to the ever-increasing number of invasive spinal procedures, discitis (or postprocedural disc space infections) were first described following these procedures as a clinical entity by Turnbull in 1953 [2,3,4]. During the past decade, this clinical entity has been on a steady rise with the widespread use of advanced imaging modalities, particularly in an expanding elderly population with substantial comorbidities subject to frequent invasive procedures. It can be said that one of the most significant changes related to pyogenic spinal infections in the literature is undoubtedly incidence data. In recent studies, the figures range from 5.8 to 7.4/100,000 in different series [5,6,7].
The key principles for the successful treatment of spinal infections are antibiotic therapy for the eradication of the underlying infection, debridement and decompression of the spinal canal in the presence of neurological deficits or epidural abscesses, and fixation of the affected segment to preserve or restore the spinal structure and stability. Long-term parenteral antibiotic therapy and immobilization dramatically increase the cost of care while significantly affecting the quality of life of patients [2,8].
Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy is a treatment modality in which patients breathe 100% oxygen in a hyperbaric chamber that has been pressurized to greater than atmospheric pressure (1 atmosphere absolute, ATA). In accordance with Dalton and Henry’s laws, the amount of oxygen dissolved in plasma increases as the fraction of inhaled oxygen (FiO2) and pressure increases. HBO2 increases the partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) in both the local soft tissue and osteomyelitic bone. These high tissue pO2 levels restore the functions of neutrophils, fibroblasts, macrophages, osteoclasts, and osteoblasts that are deficient in specific anti-infectious, inflammatory, or reparative functions in environments where oxygen levels are insufficient, as in infected tissue. HBO2 also augments the bactericidal activity of certain antibiotics [9,10,11,12]. There are several published reports noting that HBO2 therapy is beneficial in the treatment of spinal infections [13,14,15,16]. However, there have been no randomized controlled studies examining the treatment indications and efficacy of HBO2 therapy in the management of these clinical entities. The aim of this study was to report our experience with HBO2 therapy in the treatment of pyogenic spinal infections in a retrospective review.

2. Material and Methods

We identified patients who were referred to our center for HBO2 therapy with a clinical diagnosis of spinal infections (vertebral osteomyelitis, pyogenic spondylitis, spondylodiscitis, surgical site infection following spine surgery, epidural abscess) through a retrospective search over a 10-year period between October 2006 and April 2016. The diagnosis of spinal infection in these patients was made on the basis of clinical, laboratory, and radiologic evaluations. The clinical data were extracted from the medical records and were reviewed for patient demographic characteristics (age, sex, and comorbidities), microbiologic evaluation, medical treatment received before HBO2 (duration, administration form), surgical intervention, HBO2 therapy received (number and duration of sessions, interval between onset of symptoms and HBO2) and final clinical outcome based on laboratory, clinical, and radiologic evaluations performed by the referred department.
Prior to HBO2, all patients were evaluated for contraindications such as the presence of untreated pneumothorax, radiologically indicated bullae or bleb, pregnancy, severe emphysema and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessed by pulmonary function tests, uncontrolled seizure disorders, and cardiovascular instability. HBO2 therapy was administered in a multiplace hyperbaric chamber once a day for five days a week during the range of two to twelve weeks. The treatment pressure was 2.5 ATA and each session consisted of three 25-min oxygen periods with five-minute air breaks to reduce the risk of oxygen toxicity. The HBO2 sessions were conducted by trained healthcare personnel under the supervision of the hyperbaric medicine specialist. The decision to terminate HBO2 was given by the referral clinic.

3. Results

A total of 19 patients with pyogenic spinal infection were referred for HBO2 therapy over a 10-year period. HBO2 was evaluated as contraindicated after consultation with the pulmonary diseases clinic for two patients: One patient had bullae in the lungs (who also had repeated Candida albicans proliferations in wound site cultures) and the other had subpleural air entrapment lesions with a history of tuberculosis, as shown by high-resolution computed tomography. In one patient, non-small cell lung cancer was detected, and he was referred so that his treatment could be continued by oncology and thoracic surgery clinics. Three patients discontinued treatment because of problems encountered during transport. Hence, the evaluations were made for 13 patients. The clinical characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1.
All patients who received HBO2 treatment (seven males, six females) had a prior history of spinal surgery. The primary diagnosis was spondylolisthesis in one patient, fracture in two patients, stenosis in three patients, and disc herniation in seven patients. The mean time between diagnosis and HBO2 treatment was 7.8 weeks. In patients referred after 2012, however, this time was 5.2 weeks. The primary symptom of all patients was pain. On admission, five patients (38%) were able to stand and walk without assistance, three patients (23%) were able to stand and walk with assistance, and five patients (38%) were unable to stand and walk because of severe pain. Conservative orthopedic treatment consisted of immobilization with rigid orthosis (hard cervical collar, thoracolumbar rigid brace, lumbosacral corset), which continued until complete healing of infection. There was also a discharging wound or sinus in the operation site in five patients. A daily wound dressing was applied in this group. In four of these five patients (80%), complete wound healing was achieved at the end of HBO2 therapy (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
An appropriate antimicrobial regimen was chosen in all patients based on microbial sensitivity results and the recommendations of infectious disease consultants. Patients who were culture-negative received empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. It was not possible to obtain samples for culture from two patients because of the localization of infection. The results of the majority of positive cultures were staphylococci (83.3%). The median value for the period of intravenous antibiotic therapy was 42 days, which was usually followed by oral antibiotics until clinical improvement and normalization of laboratory findings (Table 2). Glycopeptides (vancomycin and teicoplanin) were the most frequently used intravenous antibiotics, and fluoroquinolones, clindamycin, and fusidic acid were the antibiotics chosen for oral therapy. Prior to HBO2 therapy, two patients were treated with incision and drainage for epidural abscess; two patients underwent irrigation, debridement, and hardware/pedicle screw removal; and one patient had incision, drainage, and underwent revision of spinal instrumentation.
The mean number of total HBO2 sessions was 33 (±18.5) sessions. The HBO2 treatment was tolerated well by all patients except two. One patient had to receive analgesics (non-steroidal anti-inflammatories) before HBO2 sessions because she had severe back pain, and in one patient the treatment was interrupted for five days because of minor middle ear barotrauma. Improvements in clinical evaluations and laboratory findings were observed in all cases at the end of the HBO2 therapy. The mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) value reduced from 76.1 (range, 6–129) to 45.7 (range, 5–81) mm/h, and the mean C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration reduced from 82.9 (range, 14–202) to 17.5 (range, 1–49.5) mg/L (normal limits; ESR: <20 mm/h, CRP: 0–5 mg/L). Infection resolution was adequately achieved in 12 of 13 patients on MR imaging at the end of HBO2 treatment or during the first month of follow-up (Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5). There was no significant improvement in one patient. To extend the total clinical follow-up period up to three years (mean: 11 months; range, 1 month–3 years), telephone interviews were conducted to determine any recurrence of symptomatic clinical infection. No recurrence of infection, spinal instability, or deformity was seen in any patients.

4. Discussion

This retrospective clinical study suggests that HBO2 therapy is efficacious in patients with pyogenic spinal infections complicated by primary therapy failure or by medical comorbidities that may impede the eradication of microbial infection and delay wound healing. Pyogenic infections of the spine are a heterogeneous group of disorders. The confusion in the nomenclature, particularly in intervertebral disc space involvement, is hidden in the details of the pathophysiology [2,17]. Contrary to infantile discs, the intraosseous arterial anastomoses of adult intervertebral discs undergo an involution around the third decade of life, creating the largest avascular structure in the human body [18]. Three different routes of pathogen spread are classic hematogenous, direct external inoculation, and spread from adjacent tissues. The involvement of the disc space and two adjacent vertebral bodies is described as spondylodiscitis, which has classic imaging of erosion of vertebral endplates, osteolytic lesions, and compression fractures, and can lead to spine instability, deformity, and risk of spinal cord compression [2,17]. It has been suggested that primary spondylodiscitis should be considered as a distinct entity from vertebral osteomyelitis, and that these lesions behave differently than vertebral osteomyelitis. In essence, the controversy about the pathogenesis of primary spondylodiscitis and its association with vertebral osteomyelitis is related to whether the adult disc can be seeded hematogenously. An increasing number of studies performed to clarify the pathophysiology of intervertebral disc degeneration also elucidated the pathophysiology of spondylodiscitis while responding to these discussions. In this context, there has been little controversy with regard to pathogenesis of postprocedural or iatrogenic discitis ever since the first description by Turnbull [2,3,19,20,21,22]. The patients’ clinical characteristics in our study were consistent with this description due to the history of previous surgical interventions in all patients who were referred for HBO2 therapy. The exception is one patient who was diagnosed as having infective endocarditis. Further spread of infection beyond the bone structures can access the surrounding tissues, causing paravertebral and psoas abscesses. When spreading into the spinal canal, it can cause epidural abscesses, subdural abscesses, and meningitis [2,8,17]. The devastating outcomes for the patient and the major costs of spinal infections to the healthcare system are due to prolonged hospitalization, increased patient care, and additional surgical interventions such as necrotic tissue debridement, irrigation, abscess draining, fusion, and hardware revision or removal. The fixation material, however, cannot be removed as easily because of instability. Hence, any treatment that could improve outcomes and reduce the need for reoperations would be extremely valuable [13,15].
The underlying rationale for the use of HBO2 therapy as an effective adjuvant in the treatment of pyogenic spinal infections is the mechanism of action overlap with the pathophysiologic process. When there is a direct inoculation to the disc space—especially in the presence of disc degeneration or a traumatic condition, which means that the annulus fibrosis and nucleus pulposus are infiltrated by new vascular formations—the acute inflammation progresses much faster [23]. The ischemia-induced endogenous lysosomal activity of neutrophils destroys the disc and adjacent endplate. When the endplates are breached, particularly in the presence of comorbidities, the infecting organisms may spread to the adjacent vertebral bodies and cause bone destruction and collapse. Avascular necrosis, bone infarction, and abscess formation can develop rapidly in this suppurative and ischemic background [21,22,23,24]. Under ambient conditions, pO2 in infected bone is lower than normal bone, which is secondary to this hypoperfusion and inflammation. The inflammatory process increases oxygen consumption, mainly due to increased consumption by polymorphonuclear leukocytes. It has been shown that Staphyloccus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, as well as Staphyloccus aureus are inefficiently killed by phagocytes while under hypoxic conditions as compared with their activity under HBO2 tension. Furthermore, increased pO2 is directly lethal to anaerobic and some microaerophilic organisms that lack the ability to produce oxygen radical-scavenging enzymes such as superoxide dismutase and catalase [9,11,15,23,24]. In the subacute and early regenerative phases, granulation tissue fills the void caused by the destruction, and new bone forms over time, [23,24]. The low oxygen levels in infected bone result in slow bone healing due to the inhibition of fibroblast, osteoclast, osteoblast, and macrophage activity. Resolution of infection, as well as bone healing, are often impeded in the presence of comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, obesity, and concomitant degenerative bone disease, malignancy, radiation damage or chemotherapy. Recurrent surgery compromising grafts or flaps, and foreign material, can make the condition much more complicated. HBO2 helps provide adequate oxygen for osteoclastic, osteoblastic, and fibroblastic activity for bone repair, angiogenesis, and wound healing in hypoperfused, hypoxic, and infected tissues [9,13,15].
Although the optimal duration remains controversial, the standard approach to treating spinal infections includes administration of microbial sensitivity-guided intravenous antibiotics for at least four to six weeks. With extensive spread into paraspinal soft tissues and undrained psoas muscle abscesses, therapy may be extended to up to eight weeks [2,8,13,17]. The synergistic effect of HBO2 therapy, when used in combination with antibiotic therapy in the treatment of osteomyelitis, has been reported in several studies [9,10,25]. This effect depends on the penetrating ability of systemically administered antibiotics, as well as the characteristics of the infected area to which they penetrate. Using P. Aeruginosa, Mader et al. demonstrated that the bactericidal activity of the aminoglycoside class of antibiotics was enhanced when oxygen tension was elevated above hypoxic levels [9,10]. However, the situation seems much more complicated for adult discs because they have no direct blood supply; their nourishment occurs via the capillaries in the outer annulus fibrosus, or by diffusion through endplates, which act as a selectively permeable barrier to solutes. Systemic antibiotics also need to enter the disc in the same way. Therefore, the properties of antibiotics such as size, solubility, binding, and charge, in particular, have been widely discussed in the literature [22,26]. It has been postulated that negatively charged antibiotics (e.g., penicillins, cephalosporins) have limited penetration because the proteoglycan concentration is high in the nucleus pulposus, whereas positively charged antibiotics (e.g., aminoglycosides, glycopeptides, and clindamycin) have adequate penetration [27,28]. In contrast, Walters et al. suggested that cephazolin, which is negatively charged and the most frequently used antibiotic, was able to penetrate the disc in humans and animal models when used prophylactically [21,22]. Zhang et al. also demonstrated that cephazolin and clindamycin could penetrate into infected and normal nucleus pulposus, and the penetration rate was associated with the presence of infection as well as charge characteristics [26]. However, to our knowledge, there is no systematic empiric research addressing the question of how HBO2 therapy affects the penetration of antibiotics into intervertebral discs.
Another purpose of this study was to evaluate how HBO2 treatment was tolerated in this patient group. HBO2 therapy is regarded as a relatively benign intervention [12,29,30]. Middle ear barotrauma is the most common adverse effect of HBO2. It can be prevented by teaching patients how to equalize pressure during compression. Equalization is possible with the active effort of the patients themselves. It may be difficult with patients who have limited capacity for active opening of the eustachian tubes, such as babies, children, patients under sedation or mechanical ventilation, or those with an inflammatory condition in the nasopharynx caused by viral infection, allergy, or gastroesophageal reflux [29,30]. In addition, attention must be paid to a patient’s position, particularly during the compression phase. It is well known that the supine position results in increased central venous pressure, and leads to venous congestion, making it more difficult to equalize middle ear pressure [29]. Almost all of our patients were admitted for treatment in the supine position due to ongoing immobilization treatments and/or pain. However, the prevalence of middle-ear barotrauma was lower than expected in our study. This can be attributed to several factors including slow compression procedures, switching a patient’s position to sitting (Fowler) or semi-sitting (Semi-Fowler) during compression, the attendance of an experienced hyperbaric nurse, and teaching patients self-inflation maneuvers during otoscopic examinations prior to sessions. Transport is one of the fundamental aspects that is often overlooked in the treatment of this patient group. The major problem affecting the treatment continuum is due to the intensification of pain during the transfer of patients between facilities. Hence, three patients did not continue therapy after one to three sessions.
The optimum timing of HBO2 therapy for pyogenic spinal infections remains unclear. In our series, the HBO2-treated patients comprised those whose iatrogenic spinal infections persisted despite the treatments applied and showed no improvement in laboratory findings. It may be thought that HBO2 could be started earlier when the pathogenesis of the disease is taken into consideration. However, further evidence is needed to make a clear statement. The appropriate duration of HBO2 therapy for pyogenic spinal infections also remains controversial. Reported treatment regimens for various series typically vary from between 10–40 sessions in total [13,14,15,16]. It has been suggested that the establishment of the healing process and infection control can be achieved in a short time. However, to achieve the bone remodeling phase and long-term infection control, longer treatment protocols are required (e.g., up to or more than 40 sessions) [15]. In our series, the number of HBO2 sessions applied was determined by the neurosurgery and infectious disease clinics based on the individual responses to treatment.
There are several limitations in the present study. First, because of its retrospective design, it does not include an approach that enables comparisons of the outcomes of patients treated with antibiotic therapy, immobilization, and surgical intervention, or those who received adjuvant HBO2 therapy. Secondly, the patients included in our study represented a much more complicated subgroup of pyogenic spinal infections because of the primary treatment failure, or because of the presence of several medical comorbidities that could impede the eradication of microbial infection. Finally, our analysis was based on a limited number of patients, and the small sample size did not allow an evaluation of the influence of these comorbidities on the outcome. Despite the limitations mentioned above, this study still provides clinical value. HBO2 therapy may be particularly useful for patients with primary treatment resistance and comorbidities, and could help to reduce long hospital stays, repeated surgeries, and morbidities. Awareness of this information will help to decrease the costs of pyogenic spinal infections to patients and the healthcare system.

5. Conclusions

This study suggests that HBO2 therapy is efficacious in patients with pyogenic spinal infections complicated by primary therapy failure or by medical comorbidities that may impede the eradication of microbial infection and delay wound healing. HBO2 therapy may be useful at reducing long hospital stays, repeated surgeries, and morbidities.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Currier, B.L.; Eismont, F.J. Infections of the spine. In The Spine, 3rd ed.; Rothman, R.H., Simone, F.A., Eds.; Saunders: Philadephia, PA, USA, 1992; pp. 2614–2615. [Google Scholar]
  2. Duarte, R.M.; Vaccaro, A.R. Spinal infection: State of the art and management algorithm. Eur. Spine J. 2013, 22, 2787–2799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Turnbull, F. Postoperative inflammatory disease of lumbar discs. J. Neurosurg. 1953, 10, 469–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vinas, F.C.; Rhodes, J.R. Spinal Infections. 2003. Available online: Emedicine.medscape.com (accessed on 13 February 2018).
  5. Akiyama, T.; Chikuda, H.; Yasunaga, H.; Horiguchi, H.; Fushimi, K.; Saita, K. Incidence and risk factors for mortality of vertebral osteomyelitis: A retrospective analysis using the Japanese diagnosis procedure combination database. BMJ Open 2013, 3, e002412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hutchinson, C.; Hanger, C.; Wilkinson, T.; Sainsbury, R.; Pithie, A. Spontaneous spinal infections in older people. Intern. Med. J. 2009, 39, 845–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kehrer, M.; Pedersen, C.; Jensen, T.G.; Lassen, A.T. Increasing incidence of pyogenic spondylodiscitis: A 14-year population-based study. J. Infect. 2014, 68, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lener, S.; Hartmann, S.; Barbagallo, G.M.V.; Certo, F.; Thomé, C.; Tschugg, A. Management of spinal infection: A review of the literature. Acta Neurochir. 2018, 160, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mader, J.; Shirtliff, M.; Calhoun, J. The use of hyperbaric oxygen in the treatment of osteomyelitis. In Hyperbaric Medicine Practice, 2nd ed.; Kindwall, E.P., Whelan, H.T., Eds.; Best Publishing Company: Flagstaf, AZ, USA, 2002; pp. 603–616. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mader, J.T.; Brown, G.L.; Guckian, J.C.; Wells, C.H.; Reinarz, J.A. A mechanism for the amelioration by hyperbaric oxygen of experimental staphylococcal osteomyelitis in rabbits. J. Infect. Dis. 1980, 142, 915–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Park, M.K.; Myers, R.A.; Marzella, L. Oxygen tensions and infections: Modulation of microbial growth, activity of antimicrobial agents, and immunologic responses. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1992, 14, 720–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Poff, A.M.; Kernagis, D.; D’Agostino, D.P. Hyperbaric Environment: Oxygen and Cellular Damage versus Protection. Compr. Physiol. 2016, 7, 213–234. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Ahmed, R.; Severson, M.A.; Traynelis, V.C. Role of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of bacterial spinal osteomyelitis. J. Neurosurg. Spine 2009, 10, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kutlay, M.; Colak, A.; Simsek, H.; Yildiz, S.; Topuz, K.; Kaya, S.; Cetinkal, A.; Demircan, M. Antibiotic and hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the management of post-operative discitis. UHM 2008, 35, 427–440. [Google Scholar]
  15. Larsson, A.; Engström, M.; Uusijärvi, J.; Kihlström, L.; Lind, F.; Mathiesen, T. Hyperbaric oxygen treatment of postoperative neurosurgical infections. Neurosurgery 2008, 62, 652–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Onen, M.R.; Yuvruk, E.; Karagoz, G.; Naderi, S. Efficiency of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in iatrogenic spinal infection. Spine 2015, 40, 1743–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Babic, M.; Simpfendorfer, C.S. Infections of the Spine. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2017, 31, 279–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ratcliffe, J.F. Anatomic basis for the pathogenesis and radiologic features of vertebral osteomyelitis and its differentiation from childhood discitis. A microarteriographic investigation. Acta Radiol. Diagn. 1985, 26, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Boscamp, J.R.; Steigbigel, N.H. Disk Space Infection. In Orthopedic Infection, 1st ed.; Schlossberg, D., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1988; pp. 49–68. ISSN 1431-1445. [Google Scholar]
  20. Stefanakis, M.; Al-Abbasi, M.; Harding, I.; Pollintine, P.; Dolan, P.; Tarlton, J.; Adams, M.A. Annulus fissures are mechanically and chemically conducive to the ingrowth of nerves and blood vessels. Spine 2012, 37, 1883–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Walters, R.; Moore, R.; Fraser, R. Penetration of cephazolin in human lumbar intervertebral disc. Spine 2006, 31, 567–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Walters, R.; Rahmat, R.; Fraser, R.; Moore, R. Preventing and treating discitis: Cephazolin penetration in ovine lumbar intervertebral disc. Eur. Spine J. 2006, 15, 1397–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Esendagli-Yilmaz, G.; Uluoglu, O. Pathologic basis of pyogenic, nonpyogenic, and other spondylitis and discitis. Neuroimaging Clin. N. Am. 2015, 25, 159–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rosenberg, A.E. Bones, joints, and soft-tissue tumors. In Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease, 8th ed.; Kumar, V., Abbas, A.K., Fausto, N., Eds.; Saunders Elsevier: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2010; pp. 1221–1223. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mendel, V.; Reichert, B.; Simanowski, H.J.; Scholz, H.C. Therapy with hyperbaric oxygen and cefazolin for experimental osteomyelitis due to Staphylococcus aureus in rats. Undersea Hyperb. Med. 1999, 26, 169–174. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang, L.; Wang, J.C.; Feng, X.M.; Cai, W.H.; Yang, J.D.; Zhang, N. Antibiotic penetration into rabbit nucleus pulposus with discitis. Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. 2014, 24, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Riley, L.H., III; Banovac, K.; Martinez, O.V.; Eismont, F.J. Tissue distribution of antibiotics in the intervertebral disc. Spine 1994, 19, 2619–2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Scuderi, G.J.; Greenberg, S.S.; Banovac, K.; Martinez, O.V.; Eismont, F.J. Penetration of glycopeptide antibiotics in nucleus pulposus. Spine 1993, 18, 2039–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lima, M.A.; Farage, L.; Cury, M.C.; Bahamad, F., Jr. Update on middle ear barotrauma after hyperbaric oxygen therapy-insights on pathophysiology. Int. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2014, 18, 204–209. [Google Scholar]
  30. Plafki, C.; Peters, P.; Almeling, M.; Welslau, W.; Busch, R. Complications and side effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 2000, 71, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The appearance of the wound with purulent drainage in the operation site prior to HBO2 treatment.
Figure 1. The appearance of the wound with purulent drainage in the operation site prior to HBO2 treatment.
Medicina 55 00164 g001
Figure 2. Discharge from the wound site stopped and complete wound healing was achieved at the end of HBO2.
Figure 2. Discharge from the wound site stopped and complete wound healing was achieved at the end of HBO2.
Medicina 55 00164 g002
Figure 3. MR imaging T1-weighted scan showing inflammatory infiltrates in the course of pre-HBO2 treatment.
Figure 3. MR imaging T1-weighted scan showing inflammatory infiltrates in the course of pre-HBO2 treatment.
Medicina 55 00164 g003
Figure 4. MR imaging T2-weighted scan showing inflammatory infiltrates in the course of pre-HBO2 treatment.
Figure 4. MR imaging T2-weighted scan showing inflammatory infiltrates in the course of pre-HBO2 treatment.
Medicina 55 00164 g004
Figure 5. MR imaging scan showing inflammatory infiltrates at the end of HBO2 treatment.
Figure 5. MR imaging scan showing inflammatory infiltrates at the end of HBO2 treatment.
Medicina 55 00164 g005
Table 1. Summary of clinical characteristics of 19 patients who referred to HBO2 therapy.
Table 1. Summary of clinical characteristics of 19 patients who referred to HBO2 therapy.
Age, Mean (Years)57 (Range: 36–78)
Sexn
Male9 (47.3%)
Female10 (52.6%)
Diagnosis before spinal surgery
Disk hernia9 (47.3%)
Disk hernia, spondylolisthesis1 (5.2%)
Vertebral fracture3 (15.7%)
Spondylolisthesis2 (10.5%)
Stenosis3 (15.7%)
No prior history of spinal intervention1 (5.2%)
Interval between onset of symptoms and diagnosis
≤4 weeks10 (52.6%)
>4 weeks9 (47.3%)
Comorbidities and risk factors
Diabetes mellitus8 (42.1%)
Hypertension10 (52.6%)
Ischemic heart disease4 (21.0%)
Infective endocarditis1 (5.2%)
Smoking11 (57.8%)
Alcohol use1 (5.2%)
Prior history of malignancies3 (15.7%)
Prior history of tuberculosis1 (5.2%)
Chronic anemia1 (5.2%)
Hypothyroidism2 (10.5%)
Peptic ulcer disease1 (5.2%)
No risk factors or comorbidities3 (15.7%)
Localization
Cervical1 (5.2%)
Thoracic1 (5.2%)
Thoracolumbar1 (5.2%)
Lumbar11 (57.8%)
Lumbosacral5 (26.3%)
Presence of adjacent tissues involvement (adjoining soft tissue, medullary canal)16 (84.2%)
Abscess formation
Paravertebral11 (57.8%)
Postvertebral (epidural)5 (26.3%)
Arachnoiditis2 (10.5%)
Microbiological evaluation
Number of culture-positive cases9 (47.3%)
Isolated microorganisms
Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA)3 (15.7%)
Staphylococcus epidermidis2 (10.5%)
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)1 (5.5%)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa1 (5.2%)
Escherichia coli1 (5.2%)
Candida albicans1 (5.2%)
Number of culture-negative cases8 (42.1%)
Unachievable obtaining of the sample for culture2 (10.5%)
Biochemical parameters
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), mm/h (mean ± standard deviation, SD)76.1 ± 31.4
Elevated (>20 mm/h)18 (94.7%)
White blood cell (WBC) count, 109/L (mean ± SD)10.47 ± 4.2
Elevated (>9.0 × 109/L)11 (57.8%)
C-reactive protein (CRP), mg/L (mean ± SD)80.9 ± 60.4
Elevated (>10 mg/L)19 (100%)
(n, number of patients).
Table 2. Summary of clinical characteristics of patients with postoperative pyogenic spinal infection who underwent HBO2 therapy (n*, number of patients).
Table 2. Summary of clinical characteristics of patients with postoperative pyogenic spinal infection who underwent HBO2 therapy (n*, number of patients).
Interval between spinal surgery and diagnosis of spinal infectionn*
≤4 weeks4 (30.7%)
>4 weeks9 (69.2%)
Interval between diagnosis of spinal infection and onset of HBO2 therapy
≤4 weeks6 (46.1%)
>4 weeks7 (53.8%)
Number of treatment sessions (mean ± standard deviation, SD)33.2 ± 18.5
Intravenous antibiotic therapy
Glycopeptide  +  beta-lactam
7 (53.8%)
Beta-lactam monotherapy5 (38.4%)
Glycopeptide monotherapy1 (7.6%)
Duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy (days) (mean ± SD)42.8 ± 13.1
Biochemical parameters
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)
Before HBO2, mm/h (mean ± SD)76.2 ± 34.8
After HBO2, mm/h (mean ± SD)45.7 ± 30.3
WBC count
Before HBO2, 109/L (mean ± SD)9.29 ± 3.49
After HBO2, 109/L (mean ± SD)7.31 ± 1.91
C-reactive protein (CRP)
Before HBO2, mg/L (mean ± SD)82.9 ± 58.3
After HBO2, mg/L (mean ± SD)17.5 ± 17.7
Response to HBO2 (Outcomes of MR imaging after HBO2 therapy)
Infection resolution12 (92.3%)
No significant improvement1 (7.6%)
n*, number of patients.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Körpınar, Ş. Could Hyperbaric Oxygen Be a Solution in the Treatment of Spinal Infections? Medicina 2019, 55, 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55050164

AMA Style

Körpınar Ş. Could Hyperbaric Oxygen Be a Solution in the Treatment of Spinal Infections? Medicina. 2019; 55(5):164. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55050164

Chicago/Turabian Style

Körpınar, Şefika. 2019. "Could Hyperbaric Oxygen Be a Solution in the Treatment of Spinal Infections?" Medicina 55, no. 5: 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55050164

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop