Next Article in Journal
Hydrothermally Grown MoS2 as an Efficient Electrode Material for the Fabrication of a Resorcinol Sensor
Next Article in Special Issue
Deep Reinforcement Learning Environment Approach Based on Nanocatalyst XAS Diagnostics Graphic Formalization
Previous Article in Journal
Degradation Mechanism of a Sauce-Glazed Ware of the Song Dynasty Salvaged out of the Water at Dalian Island Wharf: Part I—The Effect of the Surface-Attached Composite Coagula
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biofuels and Nanocatalysts: Python Boosting Visualization of Similarities

by
Fernando Gomes Souza, Jr.
1,2,*,
Kaushik Pal
3,
Jeffrey Dankwa Ampah
4,
Maria Clara Dantas
2,
Aruzza Araújo
5,
Fabíola Maranhão
1 and
Priscila Domingues
2
1
Biopolymers & Sensors Lab, Instituto de Macromoléculas Professora Eloisa Mano, Centro de Tecnologia-Cidade Universitária, Universidade Federal de Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-914, RJ, Brazil
2
Biopolymers & Sensors Lab, Programa de Engenharia da Nanotecnologia, COPPE, Centro de Tecnologia-Cidade Universitária, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-914, RJ, Brazil
3
University Center for Research and Development (UCRD), Department of Physics, Chandigarh University, Ludhiana–Chandigarh State Hwy, Mohali 140413, Punjab, India
4
School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
5
LABPROBIO, Institute of Chemistry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-970, RN, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(3), 1175; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16031175
Submission received: 7 December 2022 / Revised: 11 January 2023 / Accepted: 19 January 2023 / Published: 30 January 2023

Abstract

:
Among the most relevant themes of modernity, using renewable resources to produce biofuels attracts several countries’ attention, constituting a vital part of the global geopolitical chessboard since humanity’s energy needs will grow faster and faster. Fortunately, advances in personal computing associated with free and open-source software production facilitate this work of prospecting and understanding complex scenarios. Thus, for the development of this work, the keywords “biofuel” and “nanocatalyst” were delivered to the Scopus database, which returned 1071 scientific articles. The titles and abstracts of these papers were saved in Research Information Systems (RIS) format and submitted to automatic analysis via the Visualization of Similarities Method implemented in VOSviewer 1.6.18 software. Then, the data extracted from the VOSviewer were processed by software written in Python, which allowed the use of the network data generated by the Visualization of Similarities Method. Thus, it was possible to establish the relationships for the pair between the nodes of all clusters classified by Link Strength Between Items or Terms (LSBI) or by year. Indeed, other associations should arouse particular interest in the readers. However, here, the option was for a numerical criterion. However, all data are freely available, and stakeholders can infer other specific connections directly. Therefore, this innovative approach allowed inferring that the most recent pairs of terms associate the need to produce biofuels from microorganisms’ oils besides cerium oxide nanoparticles to improve the performance of fuel mixtures by reducing the emission of hydrocarbons (HC) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx).

1. Introduction

Biofuel is any material used to generate energy from biomass [1]. Biofuels’ energy source comes from biomass, which stores the sun’s energy as chemical energy [2]. Several different biomass sources include aquatic and terrestrial plants, forest and agricultural residues, vegetable oils, and municipal and industrial waste [3]. The main types of biofuels are biodiesel [4], biogas [5], and bioethanol [6]. Despite the numerous advantages, such as environmental sustainability [7] and the potential to fully or partially replace fossil fuels [8], biofuels carry some disadvantages, such as pollution caused by intensive crops, high water consumption, the loss of biological diversity, and food habitats [9]. There is also a concern that using crops to produce biofuels would increase the price of agricultural food products [10]. Thus, developing more efficient methods for biofuel production is key to the best use of renewable energy sources, providing the desired transition from petroleum-derived fuels to fuels from sustainable sources without the need to increase agricultural areas [11]. For this, using more efficient catalytic systems [12], such as inorganic materials called nanocatalysts (NCs), is an embracing pursuit, thus, distinguishing the NCs as leading players in the nanocatalysis field [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20].
Nanocatalysis bridges the gap between homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis, combining both advantages [21]. NCs have a high surface area, increasing the contact between the reactants and the catalyst surface and significantly increasing catalytic activity [22]. Besides that, reactions in the presence of NCs occur under mild operating conditions. As they usually are magnetizable species, NCs are easily separable from the reaction medium due to their insolubility [23]. According to the existing literature [24,25,26], relevant examples of NCs include nanoparticles containing cobalt [27,28,29,30,31], gold [32,33,34], iron [35,36,37,38,39,40], nickel [41,42,43,44], palladium [45,46,47,48,49,50], and platinum [42,51,52,53]. Among the most diverse uses of NCs are biodiesel production [54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63], dyeing [64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73], energy storage [74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83], fuel cells [60,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92], medicine [93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102], modification of carbon nanotubes [103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112], solid composite rocket propellants [113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122], and water purification [123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132].
The present work deals with biofuel applications, introducing the result of a systematic search for the keywords “biofuels” and “nanocatalysts” in the Scopus database. This search, performed on 31 May 2022, returned 1071 documents. Even in a small context obtained from two keywords (nanocatalysts and biofuels), when put in perspective, the number of documents gathered is equivalent to about twelve copies of the famous book “Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix” or about eight copies of Samuel Richardson’s popular novel “Clarisa.” This approximation was performed considering that the analyzed documents possess, on average, ten pages. If a researcher could have eight hours of reading a day and could read about one hundred and thirty-five pages per day, reading those one thousand and seventy-one documents would require seventy-nine full days of work. In other words, the volume of information available in a single search far exceeds the human ability to read and store information, making it impossible to describe the state-of-the-art unless the researcher already has many years of experience in the specific subject. Thus, in a world where people are driven to make decisions faster and faster, processing a large volume of information in a reasonable time is essential, which is perfectly reliable for modern computers. Using these computers and software specially designed for analyzing this textual information is crucial to taking advantage of the vast scientific information available in the scientific repositories. For these reasons, the bibliometric analysis method has become a popular approach within the scientific space for analyzing huge number of documents simultaneously. Based on bibliometric analysis results, one can grasp the knowledge domain of an existing or growing field at a faster rate than reading each document one by one.
So, today, several research groups use bibliometric tools to track and analyze the evolutionary nuances and research hotspots of their field of study. Among the available studies, the ones developed by researchers from Tianjin University concerning biofuels drew our attention. For instance, the investigation involving the characteristics and perspectives for the use of renewable energy in Africa deserves to be highlighted, where an overview between 1991 and 2021 showed that solar energy, carbon dioxide emissions, and rural electrification are the topics that have been most researched over the years, whereas biofuel consumption is on the rise in the region [133]. In another work, the decarbonization of the road transport industry was studied through the application of low-carbon alcohols (LCA fuels) in internal combustion engines. The study showed that the most relevant topics are combustion, performance, and emission characteristics of LCA-fueled machines [134,135]. A third work studied the decarbonization of the maritime transport industry. The results revealed that liquified natural gas is the most researched alternative shipping fuel, but that methanol, ammonia, and hydrogen are promising fuels for the industry’s decarbonization targets [136].
Thus, here in the present work, the keywords in titles and abstracts were analyzed using the VOSviewer software. This software generates data maps of bibliometric or word networks based on the Visualization of Similarities (VOS) technique proposed by researchers Nees Jan van Eck and Ludo Waltman [137]. The Visualization of Similarities technique is for the literature review analyses [138]. The co-occurrence analysis, shown in Overlay Maps, allows counting the number of articles published simultaneously. The distance between the keywords or nodes can be described as quasi-inversely proportional to the similarity, which is nothing more than the relationship in terms of the keywords’ co-occurrence. More considerable distances indicate weaker relationships, while smaller distances indicate stronger relationships between nodes. Thus, the VOSviewer software uses the Visualization of Similarities metric to build a network of keywords composed of adjectives and nouns, which occur in more than one article. After this calculation, the clusters and nodes are shown on a two-dimensional map [139].
A search on the Scopus database using the words “Visualization of Similarities” and VOSviewer returned eighty-two documents [140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221] sorted by area. The gathered documents were classified into twenty areas: (1) business, management, and accounting (17.4%), (2) social sciences (16.1%), (3) computer science (14.2%), (4) engineering (10.3%), (5) environmental science (8.4%), (6) medicine (6.5%), (7) energy (5.2%), (8) mathematics (5.2%), (9) decision sciences (3.2%), (10) agricultural and biological sciences (1.9%), (11) arts and humanities (1.9%), (12) economics, econometrics and finance (1.9%), (13) physics and astronomy (1.9%), (14) chemical engineering (1.3%), (15) psychology (1.3%), (16) biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology (0.6%), (17) chemistry (0.6%), (18) Earth and planetary sciences (0.6%), (19) health professions (0.6%), and (20) materials science (0.6%). Therefore, the VOSviewer software is a multidisciplinary tool that makes it easier to understand broad topics.
Despite all the functionality implemented in VOSviewer, direct analysis is limited to the “VOSviewer map file”, which contains nodes, clusters, and link strengths (measured in joint counts of occurrences). A second file called “VOSviewer network file” contains only numerical information, which relates the nodes, pair by pair, with the strength of the connection between them. Therefore, an evolution of the use of the data generated by VOSviewer demands more computational resources implemented in a code used for the first time here in this work. This code, written in Python, defines the node pairs with the highest binding strengths, the node pairs with the most recent annual mean values, and the Euclidean distance between nodes. Those 1071 documents had their titles and abstracts analyzed by clustering techniques via Visualization of Similarities implemented in the VOSviewer software and deepened by data reprocessing using the Pandas Python library. Results referring to the number of publications per year, area of knowledge, and country allowed to draw a global panorama. Besides that, the most recent association of terms among the analyzed documents occurs between “exhaust gas temperature” and “CeO2 (Cerium (IV) oxide) nanoparticles-dispersed water–diesel–biodiesel”. Therefore, the collected data point in the direction of the most current scientific efforts to improve the quality of diesel engines, making them less polluting [222].

2. Materials and Methods

Worldwide tendencies in research about “biofuels” and “nanocatalysts” were determined by data mining. The names of specific biofuels, such as methanol or ethanol, were not used to avoid the contamination of the research subject with petrochemical ones. All available information was retrieved and analyzed according to the following steps.
First, all articles related to research themes subscribed to the Scopus database were searched, which was chosen because it returned 1071 documents against 35 ones for WoS. Data from papers containing the term “nanotechnology” in the title, abstract, or keywords, using the key TITLE-ABS-KEY (“biofuels”) AND “nanocat*” AND (LIMIT-TO (DOCTYPE, “ar”)) were selected. Then, the gathered information was classified by the number of publications per year, area of knowledge, and country using the Scopus Database tools. The primary data files, including the list of the 1071 scientific papers, are available on GitHub (https://github.com/ftir-mc/Biofuel-nanocatalyst.git (accessed on 31 May 2022)).
Then, the RIS file from Scopus was processed using the VOSviewer software, v. 1.6.18 [139]. The bibliometric classification was made in the “overlay” and “network” modes. Additionally, the files were exported as NET and MAP for overlay and cluster classification, respectively. Data from MAP files were organized by cluster size and total link strength. The top-five nodes in each cluster were selected and plotted.
Finally, a software was written in Python using the Kaleido [223], Matplotlib [224], NumPy [225], Pandas [226], PIL [227], Plotly [228], and Seaborn [229] libraries. Besides those, IPython.display [230], Plotly.express [231], and Statsmodels.stats.multicomp.pairwise_tukeyhsd [232] modules were also used. This software defines the terms (nodes) correlated with each other, pair to pair, initially registered numerically in the first and second columns of the network file generated by VOSviewer. Then, it was possible to identify the nodes with the highest Link Strength Between Items (LSBI) presented in the third column of the VOSviewer network file and the nodes with the most recent annual mean values. In addition, the Euclidean distance between the nodes was calculated. The logical diagram is shown in Figure 1.

3. Discussion and Results

To reach the Paris Agreement target of a 1.5–2 °C global warming limit [233], the role of biofuels in substituting liquid fossil fuels cannot be undermined. Considering this, several studies have been conducted over the years to assess the emission reduction potential of replacing conventional fuels with biofuel. Of particular interest, more recent studies have paid keen attention to nanocatalysts as additives for improving the cleaner combustion of both pure fossil fuels and their blends with biofuels for limiting the production of greenhouse gasses [234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247]. Despite the significant contributions to the existing literature on biofuels and nanocatalysts, there is a considerable research gap regarding this field’s evolutionary trends, research hotspots, and characteristics. With this knowledge, the future direction and development of the field can be ascertained, and a well-informed decision for future advancements can be made. So, this work seeks to fill the existing gap and contribute to the existing literature.
The Results Section is presented in subtopics aiming to make the text more accessible to the readers’ understanding.

3.1. Documents per Year

Figure 2 shows the evolution in the number of published documents on biofuel and nanocatalysts (NCs) in the Scopus database.
The first documents are from 2009. After that date and until 2021, the data trend is described by a polynomial function of order 2, with an R2 equal to 0.9745. Using classical mechanics as an analogy, whether Figure 2 presented linear behavior would correspond to the “Uniform Motion”, indicating a continuous and steady increase in interest in each subject over time. In turn, the behavior of the number of publications over the years shown in Figure 2 is similar to the “Uniformly Varied Movement’’. Thus, the “accelerated” behavior of the curve in Figure 2 indicates that interest in the subject increases quickly, driven by the urgency of the brightest human minds for a solution to the anthropogenic environmental devastation that could lead humanity to extinction in a brief time. Another motivator comes from data extracted from the EurObservER Database [248], which shows the price of biofuels in Europe in 2005 at an average value of 48 Euro/MWh. In the following measure, made available in 2010, the average value of biofuels is equal to 59 Euro/MWh, corresponding to an increase of 23%. In 2015, this value stabilized at 58 Euro/MWh, returning to 59 Euro/MWh in 2018 and 2019. These data show that despite the growing demand for biofuels to minimize anthropogenic impacts, these commodity’s value has remained stable, a direct result of the scientific progress registered over the last few years, especially after 2013. Therefore, it is likely that the number of publications will continue to increase rapidly over the next few years.

3.2. Documents per Subject Area and Top-10 Main Authors

Another exciting classification automatically offered by the Scopus database is the classification by knowledge area, shown in Figure 3.
Among the areas of knowledge, the most remarkable contributions came from energy (579 documents), chemical engineering (427), environmental science (363), chemistry (342), engineering (140), materials science (106), physics and astronomy (69), biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology (66), agricultural and biological sciences (59), and medicine (40). The sum of the number of documents exceeds the total number of articles gathered in this research because each document can be in more than one knowledge area simultaneously.
Regarding journals, the most extensive contributions came from renewable energy (128 documents), bioresource technology (69), fuel (63), energy (30), ACS sustainable chemistry and engineering (24), biomass and bioenergy (22), energy conversion and management (20), green chemistry (18), chemosphere (17), and International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (17).
Besides that, the top 10 scientists working in this area are: Li, H. (Scopus_ID: #35933455300); Yang, S. (Scopus_ID: #7408519878); Haghighi, M. (Scopus_ID: #35237013100); Juan, J.C. (Scopus_ID: #56068042700); Show, P.L. (Scopus_ID: #47861451300); Taufiq-Yap, Y.H. (Scopus_ID: #57194506693); Tavasoli, A. (Scopus_ID: #8937178400); Ahmad, M. (Scopus_ID: #56430353500); Brindhadevi, K. (Scopus_ID: #57200567025); and Ong, H.C. (Scopus_ID: #55310784800). Each contributed 26, 24, 17, 17, 15, 15, 14, 13, 13, and 12 papers, respectively. The specific investigation regarding their contributions was not the aim of this work, but this data could be a fascinating topic for future work.

3.3. Documents per Country and Word Cloud

Figure 4 shows the countries that contributed the most to the theme. Figure 4 was prepared using the DataWrapper online tool, and the original is available at https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/qMjZN/1/ (accessed on 23 September 2022). The data extracted from the Scopus database have the following classification: China (296 documents), India (229), Iran (115), Malaysia (95), United States (78), Saudi Arabia (62), South Korea (45), United Kingdom (44), Egypt (42), and Brazil (38). These data make it clear that the most prominent players in the field are China and India, countries with huge populations that need all energy sources, including renewable ones. Besides, despite the annual production of biofuels from Iran and Saudi Arabia being equal to zero thousand barrels per day [249,250], these countries are among the most prominent players studying biofuels in the world. Thus, the most extensive global oil producers are preparing for the revolution that will replace the fossil-based energy matrix with a renewable one.
Although these facts about the fundamental areas and the leading players are fascinating, even from a geopolitical point of view, this is not the focus of this work, which is interested in terms and associations of terms in the documents researched.
Therefore, the first strategy employed was constructing a word cloud using the words of titles and abstracts. The result is shown in Figure 5.
The visual analysis of Figure 5 allows us to infer that the most frequent terms in the word cloud are “catalyst”, “biodiesel”, and “production”. The present analysis was performed using Voyant Tools, indicating how many times these words are present in the text. More specifically, the most frequent words in the corpus [251] are catalyst (2054 times), biodiesel (1812), oil (1742), production (1483), and reaction (1182).

3.4. Visualization of Similarities

All this information presented before is exciting and enriching but of little practical value. Thus, improved tools are essential for understanding the context in which the topic of biofuels and nanocatalysts is inserted and where the technical-scientific focus is heading. The VOSviewer software allows a particular approach based on a method called VOS, meaning “visualization of similarities” [137].
Figure 6 and Figure 7 show the maps generated by VOSviewer software using data gathered here.
The database is available on GitHub, as described in the Methods section. VOSviewer generates a classification by grouping the analyzed texts’ keywords, consisting of a proximity map containing nodes (terms selected by relevance in the number of occurrences) and clusters containing these nodes, as shown in Figure 6. Succinctly, the closer the two terms are, the more significant the correlation between them. The second way of visualizing is via the Overlay map, shown in Figure 7, which presents the same nodes as in the previous case, now sorted by terms’ average years, so that older terms are marked with cold colors while newer terms are warm colors.
Therefore, Figure 6 shows the existence of seven clusters. In red, the main node of cluster 1 is HMF (5-hydroxymethylfurfural). The main node in cluster 2 in green is “biodiesel yield”. In turn, in cluster 3, in dark blue, the primary node is microalgae. In cluster 4, in yellow, the main node is “hydrothermal liquefaction”. The central node of cluster 5, in purple, is the enzyme. Diesel is the primary node of cluster 6, highlighted in light blue). Finally, cellulose is the central node of cluster 7, highlighted in orange. In turn, Figure 7 shows the evolution of the main theme of this research, where all the most current nodes are in orange-reddish tones, while the older ones are in blue. In general, around the average year of 2018, priority was given to topics involving enzymes, electrodes, and glucose. Between 2019 and 2020, the focus shifted to the yield of biodiesel and microalgae. More recently, between 2020 and 2021, the focus of research shifted to diesel engines, seeking to increase efficiency and reduce the emission of toxic pollutant gasses.
Although functional and visually beautiful, the map representation has several overlays that make analysis difficult.
Thus, the developed code seeks to overcome this disadvantage. The first information provided is regarding the top five nodes of each cluster. So, the top five nodes per cluster are: hmf or 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (cluster 1; Occ. 147), hydrogenation (cluster 1; Occ. 141), hydrodeoxygenation (cluster 1; Occ. 114), lignin (cluster 1; Occ. 95), dmf or 2,5-dimethylfuran (cluster 1; Occ. 81), biodiesel yield (cluster 2; Occ. 97), seed oil (cluster 2; Occ. 60), liquid (cluster 2; Occ. 59), rsm or Response Surface Methodology (cluster 2; Occ. 58), oil molar ratio (cluster 2; Occ. 57), microalgae (cluster 3; Occ. 130), review (cluster 3; Occ. 124), medium (cluster 3; Occ. 57), wastewater (cluster 3; Occ. 53), pretreatment (cluster 3; Occ. 50), hydrothermal liquefaction (cluster 4; Occ. 87), htl or hydrothermal liquefaction (cluster 4; Occ. 66), bio oil yield (cluster 4; Occ. 55), hzsm or protonated zeolite catalysts (cluster 4; Occ. 51), mj kg (cluster 4; Occ. 42), enzyme (cluster 5; Occ. 89), glucose (cluster 5; Occ. 82), electrode (cluster 5; Occ. 76), biofuel cell (cluster 5; Occ. 68), oxidation (cluster 5; Occ. 60), diesel (cluster 6; Occ. 126), blend (cluster 6; Occ. 89), emission (cluster 6; Occ. 87), diesel engine (cluster 6; Occ. 79), combustion (cluster 6; Occ. 60), cellulose (cluster 7; Occ. 85), lipase (cluster 7; Occ. 63), hemicellulose (cluster 7; Occ. 27), day (cluster 7; Occ. 18), viz or videlicet (cluster 7; Occ. 13).
The top five nodes per cluster are also shown in Figure 8.
Regarding the nodes of Cluster 1, shown in Figure 8, second-generation biofuels that use lignocelluloses or celluloses are outstanding alternatives to fossil fuels. Besides, lignocellulosic biomass and carbohydrates are the preferred green, sustainable, and inedible raw materials to prepare various biofuels and valuable chemicals. Furan-based fuels such as 2,5-dimethylfuran (DMF) and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) provide a higher energy density than ethanol. DMF is insoluble in water. HMF is a critical intermediate in the DMF synthesis process. DMF is a promising fuel for compression-ignition and spark-ignition engines. These species can improve engine performance, emission, and combustion characteristics compared to other liquid biofuels without modifying the engine structure. Thus, the high energy density, low freezing point, high octane number, high boiling point, high combustion quality, and low pollution emissions make DMF a suitable alternative for commercial gasoline and diesel [252]. Besides being potential biofuels, DMF and HMF are known as intermediates to synthesize other biomaterials and pharmaceuticals [253,254,255,256,257,258], which add value to these molecules.
In turn, regarding the nodes of Cluster 2, the growing concern with the sustainability of several first-generation biofuels is the critical concern of several works that seek the production of biodiesel from non-food crops. This fuel is called second-generation biodiesel, and its main positive points are the consumption of residual oils, the use of abandoned land, and the independence of food crops. Still, the global biofuel production market has not expanded considerably. Among biofuels, biodiesel has the most potential for use as an alternative, biodegradable, renewable, and environmentally friendly fuel. Despite this, production optimization is a vital issue in increasing the scope of this biofuel. For this, the use of residual oils, the selection of inedible oilseed species with high oil yield, and the optimization of processes are fundamental studies [259]. Among the optimization techniques, the response surface methodology stands out due to its advantages, such as the determination of the independent variables’ magnitudes, the ability to model the system mathematically, as well as the time savings and cost reduction due to the smallest number of experiments necessary for the construction of the response surface [260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272].
As for the nodes of Cluster 3, different wastewater sources such as municipal, agricultural, and industrial contain more significant amounts of organic and inorganic contaminant nutrients released into water bodies without proper treatment, resulting in eutrophication. The main reason for the waste above is the absence of efficient and economical methods for wastewater treatment. However, wastewater is perfect for microalgae growth. These are single-cell photosynthetic organisms capable of growing in wastewater and even sewage. Thus, wastewater treatment with microalgae is advantageous, as it decreases the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and removes inorganic nutrients (nitrates and phosphates) from wastewater, in addition to sequestering carbon dioxide via fixation of inorganic carbon from the atmosphere. Despite the incredible versatility of microalgae, wastewater has different compositions and needs to be treated beforehand [273]. Thus, it is often necessary to adjust nutrients and other factors such as temperature, pH, salinity, light intensity, and duration of the microalgae growth process. Another crucial issue is the selection of microalgae species [274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281]. Finally, the microalgae-mediated wastewater treatment can directly produce biofuel (bioelectricity and biohydrogen), besides lipid-rich biomass, essential for biodiesel production [282,283,284].
Concerning Cluster 4, biomass conversion methods consist of biochemical methods such as fermentation and thermochemical methods, which include combustion, pyrolysis, gasification, and liquefaction. Thermochemical liquefaction is an efficient and promising way to convert biomass into solid waste, liquid or bio-crude fuel, and gas. Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is the thermochemical process that treats wet biomass at temperatures between 250 and 350 °C and pressures between 5 and 15 MPa. HTL is conducted in the presence of a solvent, which can be water or alcohol, with or without a catalyst. The catalysts influence the yield and quality of the bio-crude obtained via the HTL process. Various acid or alkaline catalysts can be used. However, they cause corrosion of liquefaction equipment and require additional steps for separation/purification increasing production costs. Thus, replacing conventional catalysts with heterogeneous ecological catalysts is pivotal in improving bio-crude yield and quality in biomass liquefaction [285]. The heterogeneous Ni/HZSM-5 catalyst is hydrothermally stable, improving the pyrolysis bio-oil. Furthermore, the Ni/HZSM-5 catalyst can be reused as heterogeneous solids separated and recovered from the reaction products. In addition, they are disposed of safely [286,287,288,289,290,291,292].
Regarding Cluster 5, obtaining energy from renewable resources is one of humanity’s main goals, and one option for this goal is enzymatic biofuel cells. These devices can convert energy derived from biofuels into electrical energy via the catalytic action of oxidoreductase enzymes. This known technology has been neglected due to its inherent difficulties, albeit the easier and faster development of metallic electrocatalysts for fuel cells. Protein immobilization and stabilization reached the necessary advance only at the end of the 20th century. Due to the incomplete oxidation of biofuels, enzymatic biofuel cells suffer from low energy density. For instance, glucose enzymatic biofuel cells can generate two electrons. However, 24 electrons can be released from glucose, showing that there is still much ground for increasing the efficiency of these devices [293]. The use of enzyme cascades is an alternative to maintaining the high energy densities of biofuel cells and increasing energy density. Enzyme cascades can mimic the metabolic pathways of enzymes to completely oxidize substrates such as ethanol and increase power density by almost ten times compared to a single enzyme ethanol biofuel cell [294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304].
Regarding Cluster 6, the transport sector is the leading consumer of diesel, producing massive emissions in diesel engines. This environmental impact can be minimized or eliminated using blends of diesel with biodiesel or biodiesel alone. Biodiesel is the safest alternative automotive fuel [305], with low particulate and hydrocarbon emissions [306]. However, biodiesel in engines presents challenges due to this biofuel’s low volatility and high viscosity, characteristics restricting fuel spraying, and good air–fuel mixture. Biodiesel–diesel blends need additional studies for their use, and the lack of knowledge of the performance of biodiesel–diesel in diesel engines is the reason for the low use of the blend of these fuels. Some of the limitations of biodiesel as a fuel are its high viscosity [307], high oxygen content [308], and high combustion temperature [309], which increase NOx emissions [310]. The diesel engine design must be modified to use biodiesel without additives, allowing for efficient self-ignition and fuel lubricity, which can be achieved using oxygenated compounds such as ethanol. Several studies discuss diesel-alcohol and diesel–biodiesel–alcohol mixtures. Although biodiesel blend in diesel engines has many advantages, the main disadvantage is low oxidative stability, generating peroxides and hydroperoxides and monomeric, oligomeric, and short-chain compounds formed via rearrangement, fission, and dimerization reactions [311]. Although the IC engine guarantees low fuel consumption and low carbon dioxide emissions, this engine is a source of particulate matter and nitrogen oxide emissions, with unfavorable effects on human health and the environment [311,312,313,314,315,316,317,318,319,320,321,322,323,324]. Therefore, studies on fuel mixtures and new engine designs are essential for expanding the use of biofuels.
Regarding Cluster 7, a trend in the versatile development of biomass decomposition techniques involves cellulase enzymes from multiple domains of bacteria. The enzymatic decomposition of cellulose depends on glycosidic hydrolases and oxidative enzymes. Several organisms secrete cocktails of “free enzymes” that synergistically degrade biomass. Enzymatic action involving three-dimensional (3D) arrangements of proteins and the chemical biology of enzymes are emerging fields. However, the physicochemical recalcitrance of cellulose and chitin limits rapid and economic degradation. Most commercial enzymes are of fungal origin. Bacterial cellulosomes increase the hydrolytic activity of fungal cellulase. Methods for producing cellulosic liquid biofuels by enzymatic hydrolysis have been developed since the end of the 20th Century [293,325]. Advances such as genetic engineering have opened new horizons in this field of study, and several pieces of research have been developed [326,327,328,329,330,331,332,333].
Table 1 shows the principal information extracted from data, sorted by the respective nodes’ highest LSBI values (top) and most recent years (bottom). The results shown in Table 1 are the direct result of the software developed especially for this work, which allows associating the numerical information provided in the network file with the labels, years, and the strength of the links of the files generated by VOSviewer.
Regarding the highest values of Link Strength Between Items or Terms (LSBI), the 2,5-Dimethylfuran (DMF) vs. 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) appears twice in Table 1 (see lines 1 and 4), with LSBI values equal to 234 and 115, respectively. The observed repetition is that the terms appear written in abbreviated and complete forms. Something similar occurs in lines 2 and 5, which have the repeated dimethylfuran vs. dmf and htl vs. hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL). Thus, only two sets of pairs should be considered, which are (i) 2,5-Dimethylfuran (DMF) vs. 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) and (ii) blend vs. diesel. The following software version should search the corpus looking for abbreviations, thus avoiding repeated terms appearing. Once again, as discussed above, it is clear the immense importance of HMF and DMF as alternative fuels, which can add extra value due to their ability to be used as precursors for several other chemicals. In addition, the other duo, blend and diesel, has relevance due to the continuous process of researching innovations and improvements in IC engines, which are responsible for most of the land transport performed by humans. This research is fundamental for reducing the anthropocentric impact of particulates and carbon dioxide emissions responsible for several environmental imbalances.
Unfortunately, the use of acronyms and abbreviations by the authors of the papers produces a certain degree of results duplication, which were identified and discarded in the final global analysis. This way, the non-duplicated information from Table 1 is presented as a diagram in Figure 9 to facilitate the discussion.
Concerning the most recently connected terms, shown at the bottom of Table 1, the CeO2 nanoparticles-dispersed water–diesel–biodiesel fuel blend (CNWEDB) vs. temperature of the engine exhaust (EGT) appears twice in Table 1, lines 6 and 10, and have LSBI values equivalent to 10 and 5, respectively. Something similar occurs in line 9, which has the repeated terms temperature of the engine exhaust (EGT) vs. temperature of the engine exhaust (EGT). Thus, only three sets of pairs could be considered. However, among the three possible candidates, only two presented higher LSBI values, which are (iii) CeO2 nanoparticles-dispersed water–diesel–biodiesel fuel blend (CNWEDB) vs. temperature of the engine exhaust (EGT) and (iv) oleaginous yeast vs. single cell oils (SCO). Their LSBI values are equal to 10 and 16, respectively. Among these same two pairs, the first has values from more recent years [2022.0 (t.1) vs. 2022.0 (t.2)] than the year values presented by the second [2022.0 (t.1) vs. 2021.44 (t.2)].
Regarding the first pair of more modern terms, there is scientific evidence that the oxygen available in biodiesel reduces the carbon monoxide concentration [334] and the IC engine’s hydrocarbon emissions [335]. On the other hand, as a significant disadvantage, biodiesel’s higher oxygen content leads to higher nitrogen oxides (NOx) [336]. Unlike pure biodiesel, NOx emissions can be reduced using water-in-biodiesel fuel emulsions. In addition, some experimental studies investigated the use of cerium (IV) oxide (CeO2) nanoparticles as an additive in diesel–biodiesel fuel mixtures and their impact on the thermal and environmental behavior of the CI diesel engine. Hydrocarbon (HC) emissions are reduced by up to 50% with cerium oxide immobilized on amide-functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) NCs dispersed in the B20 mixture [337,338,339,340]. The engine in this mixture also produced lower carbon monoxide (CO) emissions than the base fuel. More recently, it has been proven that the presence of CeO2 nanoparticles in water–diesel–biodiesel fuel blend increases the engine’s brake thermal efficiency (BTE) by 7.65% over diesel. Additionally, the heat losses were observed at 80% engine load for CNWEDB, indicating a minimum better fuel energy converted to useful work [341].
Finally, about the second pair of more recent terms, yeasts are microbial agents for the efficient production of free fatty acids, fatty alcohols, and alkanes [342]. For instance, the yeasts Rhodotorula glutinis and Rhodosporidium toruloides can store more than 80% of lipids in their biomass [343]. Microbial oils derived from oleaginous yeasts, fungi, bacteria, and algae are also known as single-cell oils (SCOs) [344]. Oleaginous yeasts can utilize various cheap carbon resources, including agro-industrial wastes such as wheat bran, sugarcane molasses, corn husk, wheat straw, and paper mill waste, making SCO production commercially viable and sustainable [345]. Thus, a series of tailings can be used, reducing the environmental impact of several monocultures and even untreated effluents [346,347,348,349].
Therefore, this work establishes that the use of yeasts for producing fats that later will be transformed into biodiesel and systems based on cerium nanoparticles are critical themes for the scientific and technological developments related to the energetic use of renewable resources.

4. Conclusions, Outlooks, and Recommendations

A myriad of scientific documents are produced annually on the most diverse topics. Thus, understanding the paths taken during scientific advances in each area is often challenging, and relevant scientific data remain hidden in these documents. So, developing strategies for understanding advances in topics of interest is crucial for good scientific work. Thus, this work established a new data handling procedure assisted by the Visualization of Similarities Method and Python.
In this study, we analyzed data from over a thousand scientific articles from Scopus. Qualitative and quantitative research tools allowed the mapping of the set of publications on the topic composed of the terms “nanocatalyst” and “biofuel”. The results revealed that the growth in publications was slow between 2009 and 2012. However, after 2013, there was a sharp growth in the number of publications. The growth in the number of publications follows a polynomial function of order 2, with a correlation equal to 0.9872. This rise is related to the increase in energy prices and the understanding that anthropogenic impacts are increasingly devastating to the environment.
The three central knowledge areas related to this study were energy, chemical engineering, and environmental science. The analysis of the countries’ performance regarding scientific content on the studied subject showed that China contributed the most to research production, followed by India, Iran, Malaysia, the United States, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, the United Kingdom, Egypt, and Brazil. The presence of China and India is a direct result of the population surplus, which is greedy for unlimited energy resources. Iran and Saudi Arabia, among the leading players on the subject, indicate their preparation for the inevitable change in the world’s energy matrix.
The VOS analysis showed the existence of seven clusters. Besides, VOS showed the migration of focal interest over the years, starting from subjects such as enzymes, electrodes, and glucose, evolving to biodiesel yield and microalgae, and finally to diesel engines and the emission of toxic pollutant gas reduction.
The software developed for this study can show the main clusters and their five primary nodes. In addition, the software can list the top five link strengths between terms and the top five most recent linked terms. Unfortunately, the use of acronyms and abbreviations by the authors of the papers produces a certain degree of duplication of results, which were identified and discarded in the final global analysis. So, the next version of the software should search the corpus looking for abbreviations, avoiding repeated terms appearing.
Therefore, two pairs with the highest LSBI values remained among the five pairs: DMF vs. HMF and blend vs. diesel. The first one is related to the ability of these two substances to be used as alternative fuels, which are also precursors of several other chemicals. The accentuated importance of the second pair is due to the continuous search for improving fuel and internal combustion engines.
In turn, among the most recent pairs, two stood out. They are CeO2 nanoparticles-dispersed water–diesel–biodiesel fuel blend vs. temperature of the engine exhaust and oleaginous yeast vs. single cell oils. The first pair highlights the search for ways to reduce CO and NOx emissions. The latter can decrease to less than 50% with cerium oxide and B20 blends. The second pair shows a search for microorganisms capable of processing oils and fats, reducing dependence on monocultures and even allowing the use of untreated effluents as precursor environments for biofuel production.
Thus, the concern with energy efficiency and environmental preservation is critical to the scientific and technological developments related to using renewable resources as energy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.G.S.J.; methodology, F.G.S.J.; software, F.G.S.J. and M.C.D.; validation, F.G.S.J., J.D.A. and K.P.; formal analysis, F.G.S.J.; investigation, F.G.S.J.; resources, A.A., F.M. and P.D.; data curation, F.G.S.J. and M.C.D.; writing-original draft preparation, F.G.S.J.; writing-review and editing, F.G.S.J., J.D.A., K.P., A.A., F.M. and P.D.; visualization, J.D.A.; supervision, F.G.S.J.; project administration, F.G.S.J.; funding acquisition, F.G.S.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Agência Nacional de Petróleo (PRH 16.1 and PRH 37.1), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq 304500/2019-4), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES–Finance Code 001), and Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ E-26/210.800/2021 (Energy), E-26/211.122/2021 (COVID), E-26/210.511/2021 (ConBraPA2022), and E-26/201.154/2021 (CNE)).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The primary data files are available on GitHub (https://github.com/ftir-mc/Biofuel-nanocatalyst.git (accessed on 6 December 2022) and https://doi.org/10.32388/XCHU6M (accessed on 6 December 2022).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Agência Nacional de Petróleo (PRH 16.1 and PRH 37.1), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq 304500/2019-4), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES–Finance Code 001), and Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ E-26/210.800/2021 (Energy), E-26/211.122/2021 (COVID), E-26/210.511/2021 (ConBraPA2022), and E-26/201.154/2021 (CNE)).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stover, L.; Piriou, B.; Caillol, C.; Higelin, P.; Proust, C.; Rouau, X.; Vaïtilingom, G. Direct Use of Biomass Powder in Internal Combustion Engines. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2019, 3, 2763–2770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Demirbaş, A. Biomass Resource Facilities and Biomass Conversion Processing for Fuels and Chemicals. Energy Convers. Manag. 2001, 42, 1357–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Datta, A.; Hossain, A.; Roy, S. An Overview on Biofuels and Their Advantages and Disadvantages. Asian J. Chem. 2019, 8, 1851–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H.; Nizami, A.-S.; Kalogirou, S.A.; Gupta, V.K.; Park, Y.-K.; Fallahi, A.; Sulaiman, A.; Ranjbari, M.; Rahnama, H.; Aghbashlo, M.; et al. Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil: A Systematic Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 161, 112411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bateni, H.; Karimi, K.; Zamani, A.; Benakashani, F. Castor Plant for Biodiesel, Biogas, and Ethanol Production with a Biorefinery Processing Perspective. Appl. Energy 2014, 136, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Maity, S.; Mallick, N. Trends and Advances in Sustainable Bioethanol Production by Marine Microalgae: A Critical Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 345, 131153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Manikandan, S.; Subbaiya, R.; Biruntha, M.; Krishnan, R.Y.; Muthusamy, G.; Karmegam, N. Recent Development Patterns, Utilization and Prospective of Biofuel Production: Emerging Nanotechnological Intervention for Environmental Sustainability—A Review. Fuel 2022, 314, 122757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Holechek, J.L.; Geli, H.M.E.; Sawalhah, M.N.; Valdez, R. A Global Assessment: Can Renewable Energy Replace Fossil Fuels by 2050? Sustainability 2022, 14, 4792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jeswani, H.K.; Chilvers, A.; Azapagic, A. Environmental Sustainability of Biofuels: A Review. Proc. Math Phys. Eng. Sci. 2020, 476, 20200351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Boly, M.; Sanou, A. Biofuels and Food Security: Evidence from Indonesia and Mexico. Energy Policy 2022, 163, 112834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hassan, M.H.; Kalam, M.A. An Overview of Biofuel as a Renewable Energy Source: Development and Challenges. Procedia Eng. 2013, 56, 39–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Xiang, Y.; Zhao, K.; Zhou, S.; Zhao, W.; Zeng, Z.; Zhu, X.; Liu, X. Sulfonic Acid Covalently Grafted Halloysite Nanotubes for Highly Efficient Synthesis of Biofuel 5-Ethoxymethylfurfural. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2022, 6, 2368–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Esmaeili, H. A Critical Review on the Economic Aspects and Life Cycle Assessment of Biodiesel Production Using Heterogeneous Nanocatalysts. Fuel Process. Technol. 2022, 230, 107224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, Y.; Duan, L.; Esmaeili, H. A Review on Biodiesel Production Using Various Heterogeneous Nanocatalysts: Operation Mechanisms and Performances. Biomass Bioenergy 2022, 158, 106356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Brindhadevi, K.; Hiep, B.T.; Khouj, M.; Garalleh, H.A. A Study on Biofuel Produced from Cracking of Low Density Poly Ethylenes Using TiO2/AlSBA-15 Nanocatalysts. Fuel 2022, 323, 124299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vardast, N.; Haghighi, M.; Zeinalzadeh, H. Catalytic Properties/Performance Evolution during Sono-Hydrothermal Design of Nanocrystalline Ceria over Zinc Oxide for Biofuel Production. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 430, 132764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Parkhey, P.; Nayak, K.; Sahu, R.; Sur, A. Confluence of Nanocatalysts and Bioenergy: An Overview of Microbial Electrochemical Systems and Biohydrogen Production. In Biohydrogen, 1st ed.; Apple Academic Press: Palm Bay, FA, USA, 2022; pp. 189–213. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gu, C.; Gai, P.; Li, F. Construction of Biofuel Cells-Based Self-Powered Biosensors via Design of Nanocatalytic System. Nano Energy 2022, 93, 106806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fattahi, B.; Haghighi, M.; Rahmanivahid, B.; Vardast, N. Green Fuel Production from Sunflower Oil Using Nanocatalysts Based on Metal Oxides (SrO, La2O3, CaO, MgO, Li2O) Supported over Combustion-Synthesized Mg-Spinel. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2022, 183, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Charchi, N.; Haghighi, M.; Shokrani, R. Influence of O2-Content on Gas-Injected Solution Combustion Design of Nanostructured Mg-Al Solid-Solution Used in Transformation of Vegetable Fats to Biofuel. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 182, 114894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cui, X.; Li, W.; Ryabchuk, P.; Junge, K.; Beller, M. Bridging Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Catalysis by Heterogeneous Single-Metal-Site Catalysts. Nat. Catal. 2018, 1, 385–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Elezovic, N.R.; Zabinski, P.; Ercius, P.; Wytrwal, M.; Radmilovic, V.R.; Lačnjevac, U.; Krstajic, N.V. High Surface Area Pd Nanocatalyst on Core-Shell Tungsten Based Support as a Beneficial Catalyst for Low Temperature Fuel Cells Application. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 247, 674–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Bano, S.; Ganie, A.S.; Sultana, S.; Sabir, S.; Khan, M.Z. Fabrication and Optimization of Nanocatalyst for Biodiesel Production: An Overview. Front. Energy Res. 2020, 8, 579014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Polshettiwar, V.; Varma, R.S. Green Chemistry by Nano-Catalysis. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 743–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gates, B.C. Individual Nanoparticles in Action. Nat. Nanotech 2008, 3, 583–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gellman, A.J.; Shukla, N. More than Speed. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 87–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ghosh, T.; Kedarnath, G.; Mobin, S.M. A Highly Active Nitrogen-Doped Mixed-Phase Mixed-Valence Cobalt Nanocatalyst for Olefins and Nitroarenes Hydrogenation. ChemistrySelect 2022, 7, e202200204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bahadoran, A.; Ramakrishna, S.; Oryani, B.; Al-Keridis, L.A.; Nodeh, H.R.; Rezania, S. Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil Using Heterogeneous Nanocatalyst-Based Magnetic Polyaniline Decorated with Cobalt Oxide. Fuel 2022, 319, 123858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhao, Q.; Espuche, B.; Kang, N.; Moya, S.; Astruc, D. Cobalt Sandwich-Stabilized Rhodium Nanocatalysts for Ammonia Borane and Tetrahydroxydiboron Hydrolysis. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2022, 9, 4651–4660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zayed, M.F.; Eisa, W.H.; Anis, B. Garlic Peel as Promising Low-Cost Support for the Cobalt Nanocatalyst; Synthesis and Catalytic Studies. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 312, 114919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jafarzadeh, H.; Karaman, C.; Güngör, A.; Karaman, O.; Show, P.-L.; Sami, P.; Mehrizi, A.A. Hydrogen Production via Sodium Borohydride Hydrolysis Catalyzed by Cobalt Ferrite Anchored Nitrogen-and Sulfur Co-Doped Graphene Hybrid Nanocatalyst: Artificial Neural Network Modeling Approach. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2022, 183, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cai, X.; Li, G.; Hu, W.; Zhu, Y. Catalytic Conversion of CO2 over Atomically Precise Gold-Based Cluster Catalysts. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 10638–10653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sun, F.; Xing, X.; Hong, H.; Xu, B.; Hao, Y. Concentrated Full-Spectrum Solar-Driven CO2 Reduction with H2O to Solar Fuels by Au Nanoparticle-Decorated TiO2. Energy Fuels 2022, 36, 6433–6444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sharma, D.; Sharma, R.; Chand, D.; Chaudhary, A. Nanocatalysts as Potential Candidates in Transforming CO2 into Valuable Fuels and Chemicals: A Review. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2022, 18, 100671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Davoodbeygi, Y.; Irankhah, A. Bimetallic Iron-Copper and Iron-Nickel Nano-Catalysts over Ceria Support for Medium Temperature Shift Reaction. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2022, 47, 28462–28474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ibrahim, N.A.; Rashid, U.; Hazmi, B.; Moser, B.R.; Alharthi, F.A.; Rokhum, S.L.; Ngamcharussrivichai, C. Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil Using Magnetic Bifunctional Calcium and Iron Oxide Nanocatalysts Derived from Empty Fruit Bunch. Fuel 2022, 317, 123525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jarullah, A.T.; Ahmed, M.A.; Al-Tabbakh, B.A.; Mujtaba, I.M. Design of a New Synthetic Nanocatalyst Resulting High Fuel Quality Based on Multiple Supports: Experimental Investigation and Modeling. Chem. Prod. Process Model. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jarullah, A.T.; Al-Tabbakh, B.A.; Ahmed, M.A.; Hameed, S.A.; Mujtaba, I.M. Design of Novel Synthetic Iron Oxide Nano-Catalyst Over Homemade Nano-Alumina for an Environmentally Friendly Fuel: Experiments and Modelling. Pet. Coal 2022, 64, 917–937. [Google Scholar]
  39. Gayathri, A.; Kiruthika, S.; Selvarani, V.; AlSalhi, M.S.; Devanesan, S.; Kim, W.; Muthukumaran, B. Evaluation of Iron-Based Alloy Nanocatalysts for the Electrooxidation of Ethylene Glycol in Membraneless Fuel Cells. Fuel 2022, 321, 124059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ao, W.; Cheng, L.; Zhang, X.; Fu, J.; Liu, Y.; Dai, J.; Bi, X. One-Step Preparation of Char-Supported Iron Nanocatalysts under Microwave Irradiation and Their Application for Tar Removal. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2022, 165, 105564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shrestha, N.K.; Patil, S.A.; Han, J.; Cho, S.; Inamdar, A.I.; Kim, H.; Im, H. Chemical Etching Induced Microporous Nickel Backbones Decorated with Metallic Fe@ Hydroxide Nanocatalysts: An Efficient and Sustainable OER Anode toward Industrial Alkaline Water-Splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 8989–9000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jang, I.; Lee, S.; Jang, J.-H.; Ahn, M.; Yoo, S.J. Improved Platinum-Nickel Nanoparticles with Dopamine-Derived Carbon Shells for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. Int. J. Energy Res. 2022, 46, 13602–13612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wells, V.; Riaz, A.; Sun, Q.; Li, X.; Yan, N.; Wang, C.-H.; Lipiński, W. Mesoporous Silica-Encaged Ultrafine Ceria-Nickel Hydroxide Nanocatalysts for Solar Thermochemical Dry Methane Reforming. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2022, 120, 143905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Karaman, O. Three-Dimensional Graphene Network Supported Nickel-Cobalt Bimetallic Alloy Nanocatalyst for Hydrogen Production by Hydrolysis of Sodium Borohydride and Developing of an Artificial Neural Network Modeling to Forecast Hydrogen Production Rate. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2022, 181, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nguyen, T.H.T.; Lee, M.W.; Hong, S.; Ahn, H.S.; Kim, B.-K. Electrosynthesis of Palladium Nanocatalysts Using Single Droplet Reactors and Catalytic Activity for Formic Acid Oxidation. Electrochim. Acta 2022, 401, 139446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Karimi, Z.; Hassanpour, A.; Kangari, S.; Marjani, A. Highly Dispersed Palladium Nanoparticles Supported on an Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquid Polymer: An Efficient Catalyst for Oxidation of Alcohols. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2022, 71, 1194–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Er, O.F.; Cavak, A.; Aldemir, A.; Kivrak, H. Hydrazine Electrooxidation Activities of Novel Carbon Nanotube Supported Tin Modified Palladium Nanocatalysts. Surf. Interfaces 2022, 28, 101680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pagliaro, M.V.; Wen, C.; Sa, B.; Liu, B.; Bellini, M.; Bartoli, F.; Sahoo, S.; Singh, R.K.; Alpay, S.P.; Miller, H.A. Improving Alkaline Hydrogen Oxidation Activity of Palladium through Interactions with Transition-Metal Oxides. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 10894–10904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, J.; Zhou, Z.; Xu, H.; Wang, C.; Hata, S.; Dai, Z.; Shiraishi, Y.; Du, Y. In Situ Nanopores Enrichment of Mesh-like Palladium Nanoplates for Bifunctional Fuel Cell Reactions: A Joint Etching Strategy. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 611, 523–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Akbayrak, S.; Özkar, S. Palladium Nanoparticles Supported on Cobalt (II, III) Oxide Nanocatalyst: High Reusability and Outstanding Catalytic Activity in Hydrolytic Dehydrogenation of Ammonia Borane. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 626, 752–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, Q.; Zhang, G.; Yuan, B.; Zhong, S.; Ji, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wu, X.; Kong, Q.; Han, J.; He, W. Core-Shell Nanocatalysts with Reduced Platinum Content toward More Cost-Effective Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. Nano Sel. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nair, A.S. Developing Computational Strategies for Platinum Nanocatalyst Based Fuel Cell Applications. 2022. Available online: http://dspace.iiti.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/9597 (accessed on 16 March 2022).
  53. Mastronardi, V.; Magliocca, E.; Gullon, J.S.; Brescia, R.; Pompa, P.P.; Miller, T.S.; Moglianetti, M. Ultrasmall, Coating-Free, Pyramidal Platinum Nanoparticles for High Stability Fuel Cell Oxygen Reduction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Taheri-Ledari, R.; Asl, F.R.; Saeidirad, M.; Kashtiaray, A.; Maleki, A. Convenient Synthesis of Dipeptide Structures in Solution Phase Assisted by a Thioaza Functionalized Magnetic Nanocatalyst. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 4719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Mozafari, R.; Gheisvandi, Z.; Ghadermazi, M. Covalently Bonded Sulfonic Acid onto the Surface of Magnetic Nanosilica Obtained from Rice Husk: CoFe2O4@RH-Pr-SO3H as Novel Acid Catalyst for Synthesis of Octahydroquinazolinone and 3,4-Dihydropyrimidinone. J. Mol. Struct. 2022, 1265, 133421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sathish, S.; Supriya, S.; Andal, P.; Prabu, D.; Aravind kumar, J.; Rajasimman, M.; Ansar, S.; Rezania, S. Effective Utilization of Azolla Filiculoides for Biodiesel Generation Using Graphene Oxide Nano Catalyst Derived from Agro-Waste. Fuel 2022, 329, 125412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Alivand, M.S.; Mazaheri, O.; Wu, Y.; Zavabeti, A.; Christofferson, A.J.; Meftahi, N.; Russo, S.P.; Stevens, G.W.; Scholes, C.A.; Mumford, K.A. Engineered Assembly of Water-Dispersible Nanocatalysts Enables Low-Cost and Green CO2 Capture. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Eisavi, R.; Ahmadi, F. Fe3O4@SiO2-PMA-Cu Magnetic Nanoparticles as a Novel Catalyst for Green Synthesis of β-Thiol-1,4-Disubstituted-1,2,3-Triazoles. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 11939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Vignesh, P.; Jayaseelan, V.; Pugazhendiran, P.; Prakash, M.S.; Sudhakar, K. Nature-Inspired Nano-Additives for Biofuel Application—A Review. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 2022, 12, 100360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zare, M.H.; Mehrabani-Zeinabad, A. Photocatalytic Activity of ZrO2/TiO2/Fe3O4 Ternary Nanocomposite for the Degradation of Naproxen: Characterization and Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 10388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jayaraman, J.; Dawn, S.S.; Appavu, P.; Mariadhas, A.; Joy, N.; Alshgari, R.A.; Karami, A.M.; Huong, P.T.; Rajasimmam, M.; Kumar, J.A. Production of Biodiesel from Waste Cooking Oil Utilizing Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Combined with Tungsto Phosphoric Acid as a Catalyst and Its Performance on a CI Engine. Fuel 2022, 329, 125411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ansaripoor-Jermafshadi, Z.; Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, A. The Experimental Design and Mechanism Study of the Rifampin Photodegradation by PbS-Co3O4 Coupled Catalyst. Mater. Res. Bull. 2022, 155, 111972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Tamjidi, S.; Kamyab Moghadas, B.; Esmaeili, H. Ultrasound-Assisted Biodiesel Generation from Waste Edible Oil Using CoFe2O4@GO as a Superior and Reclaimable Nanocatalyst: Optimization of Two-Step Transesterification by RSM. Fuel 2022, 327, 125170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Beker, S.A.; Cole, I.; Ball, A.S. A Review on the Catalytic Remediation of Dyes by Tailored Carbon Dots. Water 2022, 14, 1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Masood, Z.; Ikhlaq, A.; Akram, A.; Qazi, U.Y.; Rizvi, O.S.; Javaid, R.; Alazmi, A.; Madkour, M.; Qi, F. Application of Nanocatalysts in Advanced Oxidation Processes for Wastewater Purification: Challenges and Future Prospects. Catalysts 2022, 12, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bashir, A.; Pandith, A.H.; Qureashi, A.; Malik, L.A.; Gani, M.; Perez, J.M. Catalytic Propensity of Biochar Decorated with Core-Shell NZVI@Fe3O4: A Sustainable Photo-Fenton Catalysis of Methylene Blue Dye and Reduction of 4-Nitrophenol. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Brummer, V.; Teng, S.Y.; Jecha, D.; Skryja, P.; Vavrcikova, V.; Stehlik, P. Contribution to Cleaner Production from the Point of View of VOC Emissions Abatement: A Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 361, 132112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tharmaraj, V.; Anbu Anjugam Vandarkuzhali, S.; Karthikeyan, G.; Pachamuthu, M.P. Efficient and Recyclable AuNPs/Aminoclay Nanocomposite Catalyst for the Reduction of Organic Dyes. Surf. Interfaces 2022, 32, 102052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bessy, T.C.; Bindhu, M.R.; Johnson, J.; Rajagopal, R.; Kuppusamy, P. Environmental Photochemistry by Cobalt Doped Magnesium Ferrites: UV Light Assisted Degradation of Anionic Azo and Cationic Thiazine Dyes. Chemosphere 2022, 299, 134396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Iravani, S.; Varma, R.S. Nanosponges for Water Treatment: Progress and Challenges. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 4182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hegde, S.S.; Bose, R.S.C.; Surendra, B.S.; Vinoth, S.; Murahari, P.; Ramesh, K. SnS-Nanocatalyst: Malachite Green Degradation and Electrochemical Sensor Studies. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2022, 283, 115818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hashemi, Z.; Shirzadi-Ahodashti, M.; Mortazavi-Derazkola, S.; Ebrahimzadeh, M.A. Sustainable Biosynthesis of Metallic Silver Nanoparticles Using Barberry Phenolic Extract: Optimization and Evaluation of Photocatalytic, in Vitro Cytotoxicity, and Antibacterial Activities against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2022, 139, 109320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Megarajan, S.; Ameen, F.; Singaravelu, D.; Islam, M.A.; Veerappan, A. Synthesis of N-Myristoyltaurine Stabilized Gold and Silver Nanoparticles: Assessment of Their Catalytic Activity, Antimicrobial Effectiveness and Toxicity in Zebrafish. Environ. Res. 2022, 212, 113159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Hong, J.H.; Park, G.D.; Kang, Y.C. Aerosol-assisted Synthesis of Bimetallic Nanoparticle-loaded Bamboo-like N-doped Carbon Nanotubes as an Efficient Bifunctional Oxygen Catalyst for Zn-air Batteries. Int. J Energy Res. 2022, 46, 5215–5225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, Y.-T.; Wang, X.-M.; Gao, D.; Wang, F.-P.; Zeng, Y.-N.; Li, J.-G.; Jiang, L.-Q.; Yu, Q.; Ji, R.; Kang, L.-L.; et al. Efficient Production of Biodiesel at Low Temperature Using Highly Active Bifunctional Na-Fe-Ca Nanocatalyst from Blast Furnace Waste. Fuel 2022, 322, 124168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Salarizadeh, P.; Rastgoo-Deylami, M.; Askari, M.B. Electrochemical Properties of Ni3S2@MoS2-RGO Ternary Nanocomposite as a Promising Cathode for Ni–Zn Batteries and Catalyst towards Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Renew. Energy 2022, 194, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lin, Y.-J.; Tsai, J.-E.; Huang, C.-C.; Chen, Y.-S.; Li, Y.-Y. Highly Porous Iron-Doped Nitrogen–Carbon Framework on Reduced Graphene Oxide as an Excellent Oxygen Reduction Catalyst for Proton-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022, 5, 1822–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gu, Y.; Wei, J.; Wang, L.; Wu, X. Insights into Highly-Efficient CO2 Electroreduction to CO on Supported Gold Nanoparticles in an Alkaline Gas-Phase Electrolyzer. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2022, 169, 054513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Roy Chowdhury, S.; Ray, A.; Chougule, S.S.; Min, J.; Jeffery, A.A.; Ko, K.; Kim, Y.; Das, S.; Jung, N. Mixed Spinel Ni–Co Oxides: An Efficient Bifunctional Oxygen Electrocatalyst for Sustainable Energy Application. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022, 5, 4421–4430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Karataş, Y.; Çetin, T.; Akkuş, İ.N.; Akinay, Y.; Gülcan, M. Rh (0) Nanoparticles Impregnated on two-dimensional Transition Metal Carbides, MXene, as an Effective Nanocatalyst for Ammonia-borane Hydrolysis. Intl. J. Energy Res. 2022, 46, 11411–11423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Feng, H.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, D. Solar Energy Storage in an All-Vanadium Photoelectrochemical Cell: Structural Effect of Titania Nanocatalyst in Photoanode. Energies 2022, 15, 4508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hou, Q.; Zhang, J.; Guo, X.; Xu, G.; Yang, X. Synthesis of Low-Cost Biomass Charcoal-Based Ni Nanocatalyst and Evaluation of Their Kinetic Enhancement of MgH2. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2022, 47, 15209–15223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhao, X.; Guo, Y.; Jing, Z.; Liu, X.; Liu, R.; Tao, R.; Cai, T.; Li, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Shuai, M. Three-Dimensional Layered Porous Graphene Aerogel Hydrogen Getters. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2022, 47, 15296–15307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yang, Y.; Zhu, X.; Wang, L.; Lang, J.; Yao, G.; Qin, T.; Ren, Z.; Chen, L.; Liu, X.; Li, W.; et al. Breaking Scaling Relationships in Alkynol Semi-Hydrogenation by Manipulating Interstitial Atoms in Pd with d-Electron Gain. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Fabio Mercado, D.; Akimushkina, L.; Rivera-Quintero, P.A.; Valderrama-Zapata, R.; Guerrero-Amaya, H.; Ballesteros-Rueda, L.M. Comprehensive Analysis of the Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials Role as Catalysts in the Low-Temperature Oxidation of Adsorbed NC7-Asphaltenes. Fuel 2022, 327, 125179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Yang, L.; Chen, C.; Bao, R.; Huang, Z.; Wang, W.; Zhang, C.; Xia, J.; Geng, J.; Li, H. Effective Green Electro-Fenton Process Induced by Atomic Hydrogen for Rapid Oxidation of Organic Pollutants over a Highly Active and Reusable Carbon Based Palladium Nanocatalyst. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 602, 154325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Dai, H.; Zhang, T.; Pu, H.; Dong, K.; Wang, Y.; Deng, Y. Electrodeposition of Alloy PtPd Nanocrystals with Shape Transforming from Low–Index Facet to High–Index Facet. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 602, 154318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Fan, D.; Guo, K.; Zhang, Y.; Hao, Q.; Han, M.; Xu, D. Engineering High-Entropy Alloy Nanowires Network for Alcohol Electrooxidation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 625, 1012–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Liang, Y.; Demir, H.; Wu, Y.; Aygun, A.; Elhouda Tiri, R.N.; Gur, T.; Yuan, Y.; Xia, C.; Demir, C.; Sen, F.; et al. Facile Synthesis of Biogenic Palladium Nanoparticles Using Biomass Strategy and Application as Photocatalyst Degradation for Textile Dye Pollutants and Their In-Vitro Antimicrobial Activity. Chemosphere 2022, 306, 135518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Cyganowski, P.; Dzimitrowicz, A. Heterogenous Nanocomposite Catalysts with Rhenium Nanostructures for the Catalytic Reduction of 4-Nitrophenol. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 6228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Feng, H.; Luo, Y.; Yan, B.; Guo, H.; He, L.; Qun Tian, Z.; Tsiakaras, P.; Kang Shen, P. Highly Stable Cathodes for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells: Novel Carbon Supported Au@PtNiAu Concave Octahedral Core-Shell Nanocatalyst. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 626, 1040–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Rezaee, S.; Shahrokhian, S. Ruthenium/Ruthenium Oxide Hybrid Nanoparticles Anchored on Hollow Spherical Copper-Cobalt Nitride/Nitrogen Doped Carbon Nanostructures to Promote Alkaline Water Splitting: Boosting Catalytic Performance via Synergy between Morphology Engineering, Electron Transfer Tuning and Electronic Behavior Modulation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 626, 1070–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Gerken, L.R.H.; Gogos, A.; Starsich, F.H.L.; David, H.; Gerdes, M.E.; Schiefer, H.; Psoroulas, S.; Meer, D.; Plasswilm, L.; Weber, D.C.; et al. Catalytic Activity Imperative for Nanoparticle Dose Enhancement in Photon and Proton Therapy. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zuo, W.; Fan, Z.; Chen, L.; Liu, J.; Wan, Z.; Xiao, Z.; Chen, W.; Wu, L.; Chen, D.; Zhu, X. Copper-Based Theranostic Nanocatalysts for Synergetic Photothermal-Chemodynamic Therapy. Acta Biomater. 2022, 147, 258–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Chen, T.; Zeng, W.; Liu, Y.; Yu, M.; Huang, C.; Shi, Z.; Lin, C.; Tang, J.; Mei, L.; Wu, M. Cu-Doped Polypyrrole with Multi-Catalytic Activities for Sono-Enhanced Nanocatalytic Tumor Therapy. Small 2022, 18, 2202964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. You, Y.; Deng, Q.; Wang, Y.; Sang, Y.; Li, G.; Pu, F.; Ren, J.; Qu, X. DNA-Based Platform for Efficient and Precisely Targeted Bioorthogonal Catalysis in Living Systems. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Khabnadideh, S.; solhjoo, A.; Heidari, R.; Amiri Zirtol, L.; Sakhteman, A.; Rezaei, Z.; Babaei, E.; Rahimi, S.; Emami, L. Efficient Synthesis of 1,3-Naphtoxazine Derivatives Using Reusable Magnetic Catalyst (GO-Fe3O4–Ti(IV)): Anticonvulsant Evaluation and Computational Studies. BMC Chem. 2022, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Zhuang, S.; Xiang, H.; Chen, Y.; Wang, L.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, J. Engineering 2D Cu-Composed Metal–Organic Framework Nanosheets for Augmented Nanocatalytic Tumor Therapy. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2022, 20, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Ashouri, F.; Faraji, A.R.; Hekmatian, Z.; Farahanipour, A. Fabrication, Characterization and Structure Activity Relationship of Co and Mn Encapsulated on Magnetic Nanocomposite and Its Application in One-Pot Tandem Synthesis of Various Tetrazoles and Vitamin K3. Chem. Pap. 2022, 76, 3581–3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zuo, W.; Chen, W.; Liu, J.; Huang, S.; Chen, L.; Liu, Q.; Liu, N.; Jin, Q.; Li, Y.; Wang, P.; et al. Macrophage-Mimic Hollow Mesoporous Fe-Based Nanocatalysts for Self-Amplified Chemodynamic Therapy and Metastasis Inhibition via Tumor Microenvironment Remodeling. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 5053–5065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Liu, Y.; Ba, F.; Liu, W.-Q.; Wu, C.; Li, J. Plug-and-Play Functionalization of Protein-Polymer Conjugates for Tunable Catalysis Enabled by Genetically Encoded “Click” Chemistry. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 4165–4174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Shahzad Shirazi, M.; Foroumadi, A.; Saberikia, I.; Moridi Farimani, M. Very Rapid Synthesis of Highly Efficient and Biocompatible Ag2Se QD Phytocatalysts Using Ultrasonic Irradiation for Aqueous/Sustainable Reduction of Toxic Nitroarenes to Anilines with Excellent Yield/Selectivity at Room Temperature. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2022, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Farah, J.; Gravel, E.; Doris, E.; Malloggi, F. Direct Integration of Gold-Carbon Nanotube Hybrids in Continuous-Flow Microfluidic Chips: A Versatile Approach for Nanocatalysis. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 613, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Zheng, Y.; Zhuang, W.; Zhang, X.; Xiang, J.; Wang, X.; Song, Z.; Cao, Z.; Zhao, C. Grape-like CNTs/BaTiO3 Nanocatalyst Boosted Hydraulic-Driven Piezo-Activation of Peroxymonosulfate for Carbamazepine Removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kohestani, T.; Sayyed-Alangi, S.Z.; Hossaini, Z.; Baei, M.T. Ionic Liquid as an Effective Green Media for the Synthesis of (5Z, 8Z)-7H-Pyrido[2,3-d]Azepine Derivatives and Recycable Fe3O4/TiO2/Multi-Wall Cabon Nanotubes Magnetic Nanocomposites as High Performance Organometallic Nanocatalyst. Mol. Divers. 2022, 26, 1441–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Liu, Z.; Li, C.; Marzavi, R. Metals Doped Carbon Nanotubes and Carbon Nanocages (Co2-CNT(8, 0) and Sc2-C78) as Catalysts of ORR in Fuel Cells. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2022, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Shojaeifar, M.; Askari, M.B.; Hashemi, S.R.S.; Di Bartolomeo, A. MnO2-NiO-MWCNTs Nanocomposite as a Catalyst for Methanol and Ethanol Electrooxidation. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2022, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ghanam, A.; Haddour, N.; Mohammadi, H.; Amine, A.; Sabac, A.; Buret, F. Nanoporous Cauliflower-like Pd-Loaded Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes as an Enzyme-Free Electrocatalyst for Glucose Sensing at Neutral PH: Mechanism Study. Sensors 2022, 22, 2706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Hasanpour Galehban, M.; Zeynizadeh, B.; Mousavi, H. NiII NPs Entrapped within a Matrix of L-Glutamic Acid Cross-Linked Chitosan Supported on Magnetic Carboxylic Acid-Functionalized Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube: A New and Efficient Multi-Task Catalytic System for the Green One-Pot Synthesis of Diverse Heterocyclic Frameworks. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 16454–16478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. He, C.; Tang, C.; Oh, W.-D. Reinforced Degradation of Ibuprofen with MnCo2O4/FCNTs Nanocatalyst as Peroxymonosulfate Activator: Performance and Mechanism. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Huang, Z.; Liu, S.; Geng, Q.; Zeng, H.; Li, Y.; Xu, S.; Sadeghzadeh, S.M. Sustainable Production of Biodiesel Using Nanocluster Giant Lemon Nanopolyoxomolybdate Supported on Carbon Nanotubes by Ionic Liquid. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2022, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Alheshibri, M.; Elsayed, K.; Haladu, S.A.; Musa Magami, S.; Al Baroot, A.; Ercan, İ.; Ercan, F.; Manda, A.A.; Çevik, E.; Kayed, T.S.; et al. Synthesis of Ag Nanoparticles-Decorated on CNTs/TiO2 Nanocomposite as Efficient Photocatalysts via Nanosecond Pulsed Laser Ablation. Opt. Laser Technol. 2022, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Hanafi, S.; Trache, D.; Meziani, R.; Boukeciat, H.; Abdelaziz, A.; Tarchoun, A.F.; Mezroua, A. Catalytic Reactivity of Graphene Oxide Stabilized Fe Complexe of Triaminoguanidine on Thermolysis of HNTO/AN Co-Crystal. Thermochim. Acta 2022, 179324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Mirzajani, V.; Nazarpour-Fard, H.; Farhadi, K.; Ghobadian, A. Copper Oxide Nano-Catalyst Incorporated TEGDN/NC/DAG Propellants: Thermal Behaviors and Kinetics. Propellants Explos. Pyrotech. 2022, 47, e202100364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Chalghoum, F.; Trache, D.; Benziane, M.; Benhammada, A. Effect of Micro- and Nano-CuO on the Thermal Decomposition Kinetics of High-Performance Aluminized Composite Solid Propellants Containing Complex Metal Hydrides. FirePhysChem 2022, 2, 36–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Dave, P.; Thakkar, R.; Sirach, R.; Deshpande, M.P.; Chaturvedi, S. Effect of Nanosize Zinc Ferrite on Thermolysis of Ammonium Perchlorate. J. Electron. Mater. 2022, 51, 785–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Anusree, T.C.; Vargeese, A.A. Enhanced Performance of Barium and Cobalt Doped Spinel CuCr2O4 as Decomposition Catalyst for Ammonium Perchlorate. J. Solid State Chem. 2022, 315, 123481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Gaete, J.; Arroyo, J.L.; Norambuena, Á.; Abarca, G.; Morales-Verdejo, C. Mechanistic Insights into the Thermal Decomposition of Ammonium Perchlorate: The Role of Amino-Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticles. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 61, 1447–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ismail, I.I.; Nordin, N.H.; Azami, M.H.; Abdullah, N.A. Metals and Alloys Additives as Enhancer for Rocket Propulsion: A Review. J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci. 2022, 90, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Zorainy, M.Y.; Kaliaguine, S.; Gobara, M.; Elbasuney, S.; Boffito, D.C. Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of the Flexible Iron-Based MIL-88B Metal–Organic Framework for Advanced Energetic Systems. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. 2022, 32, 2538–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Dave, P.; Thakkar, R.; Sirach, R.; Badgujar, D.; Deshpande, M.; Chaturvedi, S. Nano Size NiCuZnFe2O4 Tri Metal Spinel Ferrite: Synthesis, Characterizations and Additive for Thermolysis of Ammonium Perchlorate. ChemistrySelect 2022, 7, e202103846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Hanafi, S.; Trache, D.; Meziani, R.; Boukeciat, H.; Tarchoun, A.F.; Abdelaziz, A.; Mezroua, A. Thermal Decomposition and Kinetic Modeling of HNTO/AN-Based Composite Solid Propellant in the Presence of GO-Based Nanocatalyst. FirePhysChem 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Bisht, N.S.; Tripathi, A.H.; Pant, M.; Kumar Upadhyay, S.; Sahoo, N.G.; Mehta, S.P.S.; Dandapat, A. A Facile Synthesis of Palladium Nanoparticles Decorated Bismuth Oxybromide Nanostructures with Exceptional Photo-Antimicrobial Activities. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2022, 217, 112640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Amuthan, T.; Sanjeevi, R.; Kannan, G.R.; Sridevi, A. A Novel P-CuFe2O4/n-ZnS Heterojunction Photocatalyst: Co-Precipitation Synthesis, Characterization and Improved Visible-Light Driven Photocatalytic Activity for Removal of MB and CV Dyes. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2022, 638, 413842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Teng, J.; Peydayesh, M.; Lu, J.; Zhou, J.; Benedek, P.; Schäublin, R.E.; You, S.; Mezzenga, R. Amyloid-Templated Palladium Nanoparticles for Water Purification by Electroreduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 134, e202116634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Khosroshahi, N.; Goudarzi, M.D.; Gilvan, M.E.; Safarifard, V. Collocation of MnFe2O4 and UiO-66-NH2: An Efficient and Reusable Nanocatalyst for Achieving High-Performance in Hexavalent Chromium Reduction. J. Mol. Struct. 2022, 1263, 132994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Rajasri, S.; Kalikeri, S.; Balachandran, S.; Gowthami, K.; Thirunarayanan, G.; Swaminathan, M.; Muthuvel, I. Enhanced Photodegradation of 2,4-Dinitrophenol by n–p Type TiO2/BiOI Nanocomposite. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2022, 99, 100337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Wang, B.; Li, S.; Wang, H.; Yao, S. Insight into the Performance and Mechanism of Magnetic Ni0.5Cu0.5Fe2O4 in Activating Peroxydisulfate for Ciprofloxacin Degradation. Water Sci. Technol. 2022, 85, 1235–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. González-González, R.B.; Rodríguez-Hernández, J.A.; Araújo, R.G.; Sharma, P.; Parra-Saldívar, R.; Ramirez-Mendoza, R.A.; Bilal, M.; Iqbal, H.M.N. Prospecting Carbon-Based Nanomaterials for the Treatment and Degradation of Endocrine-Disrupting Pollutants. Chemosphere 2022, 297, 134172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zhang, Y.-J.; Huang, G.-X.; Winter, L.R.; Chen, J.-J.; Tian, L.; Mei, S.-C.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, F.; Guo, Z.-Y.; Ji, R.; et al. Simultaneous Nanocatalytic Surface Activation of Pollutants and Oxidants for Highly Efficient Water Decontamination. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Iqbal, H.M.N.; Bilal, M.; Rodriguez-Couto, S. Smart Nanohybrid Constructs: Concept and Designing for Environmental Remediation. Chemosphere 2022, 301, 134616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Khan, A.H.; Khan, N.A.; Zubair, M.; Azfar Shaida, M.; Manzar, M.S.; Abutaleb, A.; Naushad, M.; Iqbal, J. Sustainable Green Nanoadsorbents for Remediation of Pharmaceuticals from Water and Wastewater: A Critical Review. Environ. Res. 2022, 204, 112243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Afrane, S.; Ampah, J.D.; Aboagye, E.M. Investigating Evolutionary Trends and Characteristics of Renewable Energy Research in Africa: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1999 to 2021. Envrion. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 59328–59362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Jin, C.; Ampah, J.D.; Afrane, S.; Yin, Z.; Liu, X.; Sun, T.; Geng, Z.; Ikram, M.; Liu, H. Low-Carbon Alcohol Fuels for Decarbonizing the Road Transportation Industry: A Bibliometric Analysis 2000–2021. Envrion. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 5577–5604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Ampah, J.D.; Yusuf, A.A.; Agyekum, E.B.; Afrane, S.; Jin, C.; Liu, H.; Fattah, I.M.R.; Show, P.L.; Shouran, M.; Habil, M.; et al. Progress and Recent Trends in the Application of Nanoparticles as Low Carbon Fuel Additives—A State of the Art Review. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Ampah, J.D.; Yusuf, A.A.; Afrane, S.; Jin, C.; Liu, H. Reviewing Two Decades of Cleaner Alternative Marine Fuels: Towards IMO’s Decarbonization of the Maritime Transport Sector. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 320, 128871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. VOS: A New Method for Visualizing Similarities Between Objects. In Advances in Data Analysis; Decker, R., Lenz, H.-J., Eds.; Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 299–306. ISBN 978-3-540-70980-0. [Google Scholar]
  138. Piccarozzi, M.; Silvestri, C.; Aquilani, B.; Silvestri, L. Is This a New Story of the ‘Two Giants’? A Systematic Literature Review of the Relationship between Industry 4.0, Sustainability and Its Pillars. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2022, 177, 121511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software Survey: VOSviewer, a Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Mulet-Forteza, C.; Socias Salvá, A.; Monserrat, S.; Amores, A. 80th Anniversary of Pure and Applied Geophysics: A Bibliometric Overview. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2020, 177, 531–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Singh, B. A Bibliometric Analysis of Behavioral Finance and Behavioral Accounting. Am. Bus. Rev. 2021, 24, 198–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Mubarrok, U.S.; Ulfi, I.; Sukmana, R.; Sukoco, B.M. A Bibliometric Analysis of Islamic Marketing Studies in the “Journal of Islamic Marketing”. J. Islamic Mark. 2022, 13, 933–955. [Google Scholar]
  143. Atsız, O.; Öğretmenoğlu, M.; Akova, O. A Bibliometric Analysis of Length of Stay Studies in Tourism. Eur. J. Tour. Res. 2022, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Seo, Y.; Park, H.-S.; Kim, H.; Kim, K.-W.; Cho, J.-H.; Chung, W.-S.; Song, M.-Y. A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Herbal Medicine for Obesity over the Past 20 Years. Medicine 2022, 101, E29240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Goo, B.; Kim, H.-N.; Kim, J.-H.; Nam, S.-S. A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on the Treatment of Facial Nerve Palsy. Medicine 2021, 100, e26984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Cancino, C.A.; Amirbagheri, K.; Merigó, J.M.; Dessouky, Y. A Bibliometric Analysis of Supply Chain Analytical Techniques Published in Computers & Industrial Engineering. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019, 137, 106015. [Google Scholar]
  147. Xue, J.; Reniers, G.; Li, J.; Yang, M.; Wu, C.; van Gelder, P.H.A.J.M. A Bibliometric and Visualized Overview for the Evolution of Process Safety and Environmental Protection. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Tur-Porcar, A.; Mas-Tur, A.; Merigó, J.M.; Roig-Tierno, N.; Watt, J. A Bibliometric History of the Journal of Psychology Between 1936 and 2015. J. Psychol. Interdiscip. Appl. 2018, 152, 199–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Mulet-Forteza, C.; Genovart-Balaguer, J.; Mauleon-Mendez, E.; Merigó, J.M. A Bibliometric Research in the Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Fields. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 101, 819–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Rauniyar, S.; Awasthi, M.K.; Kapoor, S.; Mishra, A.K. Agritourism: Structured Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2021, 46, 52–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Lagar-Barbosa, M.P.; Escalona-Fernández, M.I.; Pulgarín, A. Analysis of Interdisciplinarity in Chemical Engineering in Spanish Universities. Rev. Esp. De Doc. Cient. 2014, 37. [Google Scholar]
  152. Kaur, A.; Sood, S.K. Analytical Mapping of Research on Disaster Management, Types and Role of ICT during 2011–2018. Environ. Hazards 2019, 18, 266–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Herrera-Franco, G.; Carrión-Mero, P.; Montalván-Burbano, N.; Mora-Frank, C.; Berrezueta, E. Bibliometric Analysis of Groundwater’s Life Cycle Assessment Research. Water 2022, 14, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Mas-Tur, A.; Roig-Tierno, N.; Sarin, S.; Haon, C.; Sego, T.; Belkhouja, M.; Porter, A.; Merigó, J.M. Co-Citation, Bibliographic Coupling and Leading Authors, Institutions and Countries in the 50 Years of Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2021, 165, 120487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Statsenko, L.; Samaraweera, A.; Bakhshi, J.; Chileshe, N. Construction 4.0 Technologies and Applications: A Systematic Literature Review of Trends and Potential Areas for Development. Constr. Innov. 2022. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Chen, H.; Huang, X.; Chen, S.; Zhu, W.; Huang, W.; Chen, K. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Mechanical Ventilation Research Theme Analysis: Co-Word Cluster Analysis. J. Coll. Physicians Surg. Pak. 2020, 30, S94–S100. [Google Scholar]
  157. Modak, N.M.; Sinha, S.; Raj, A.; Panda, S.; Merigó, J.M.; Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A.B. Corporate Social Responsibility and Supply Chain Management: Framing and Pushing Forward the Debate. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Soytas, M.; Danacioglu, Y.O.; Boz, M.Y.; Horuz, R.; Albayrak, S. COVID-19 and Urology: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2021, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Chonsawat, N.; Sopadang, A. Defining Smes’ 4.0 Readiness Indicators. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Rodríguez-Medina, J.; Gómez-Carrasco, C.J.; López-Facal, R.; Miralles-Martínez, P. Emerging Trends on the Academic Production of History Education. Rev. De Educ. 2020, 2020, 211–242. [Google Scholar]
  161. Robertson, J.; Pitt, L.; Ferreira, C. Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and the Public Sector: A Bibliographic Analysis. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 2020, 72, 100862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Robertson, J.; Ferreira, C.; Pitt, L.; Pitt, C. Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: A 25-Year Bibliographic Overview: An Abstract. In Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  163. Burki, M.A.K.; Burki, U.; Najam, U. Environmental Degradation and Poverty: A Bibliometric Review. Reg. Sustain. 2021, 2, 324–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Cancino, C.A.; Amirbagheri, K.; Merigó, J.M.; Dessouky, Y. Evolution of the Academic Research on Supply Chain and Global Warming. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, Beijing, China, 18–21 October 2019; Volume 2019. [Google Scholar]
  165. Othman, N.; Mohd Suki, N.; Mohd Suki, N. Evolution Trends of Facebook Marketing in Digital Economics Growth: A Bibliometric Analysis. Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol. 2021, 15, 68–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Merigó, J.M.; Pedrycz, W.; Weber, R.; de la Sotta, C. Fifty Years of Information Sciences: A Bibliometric Overview. Inf. Sci. 2018, 432, 245–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Martínez-López, F.J.; Merigó, J.M.; Valenzuela-Fernández, L.; Nicolás, C. Fifty Years of the European Journal of Marketing: A Bibliometric Analysis. Eur. J. Mark. 2018, 52, 439–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Modak, N.M.; Merigó, J.M.; Weber, R.; Manzor, F.; Ortúzar, J.D.D. Fifty Years of Transportation Research Journals: A Bibliometric Overview. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2019, 120, 188–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Verma, R.; Lobos-Ossandón, V.; Merigó, J.M.; Cancino, C.; Sienz, J. Forty Years of Applied Mathematical Modelling: A Bibliometric Study. Appl. Math. Model. 2021, 89, 1177–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Modak, N.M.; Lobos, V.; Merigó, J.M.; Gabrys, B.; Lee, J.H. Forty Years of Computers & Chemical Engineering: A Bibliometric Analysis. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2020, 141, 106978. [Google Scholar]
  171. Cancino, C.; Merigó, J.M.; Coronado, F.; Dessouky, Y.; Dessouky, M. Forty Years of Computers & Industrial Engineering: A Bibliometric Analysis. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2017, 113, 614–629. [Google Scholar]
  172. Laengle, S.; Lobos, V.; Merigó, J.M.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Cobo, M.J.; De Baets, B. Forty Years of Fuzzy Sets and Systems: A Bibliometric Analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2021, 402, 155–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Laengle, S.; Merigó, J.M.; Miranda, J.; Słowiński, R.; Bomze, I.; Borgonovo, E.; Dyson, R.G.; Oliveira, J.F.; Teunter, R. Forty Years of the European Journal of Operational Research: A Bibliometric Overview. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2017, 262, 803–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Shukla, N.; Merigó, J.M.; Lammers, T.; Miranda, L. Half a Century of Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1970 to 2017. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2020, 183, 105075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Mas-Tur, A.; Modak, N.M.; Merigó, J.M.; Roig-Tierno, N.; Geraci, M.; Capecchi, V. Half a Century of Quality & Quantity: A Bibliometric Review. Qual. Quant. 2019, 53, 981–1020. [Google Scholar]
  176. Aghimien, E.I.; Aghimien, L.M.; Petinrin, O.O.; Aghimien, D.O. High-Performance Computing for Computational Modelling in Built Environment-Related Studies—A Scientometric Review. J. Eng. Des. Technol. 2020, 19, 1138–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Martínez-López, F.J.; Merigó, J.M.; Gázquez-Abad, J.C.; Ruiz-Real, J.L. Industrial Marketing Management: Bibliometric Overview since Its Foundation. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020, 84, 19–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Arumugam, P.R.; Suki, N.M.; Suki, N.M. Innovation and Technology in Online Education: A Bibliometric Analysis. In Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; Volume 443. [Google Scholar]
  179. Nasrallah, N.; Atayah, O.F.; El Khoury, R.; Hamdan, A.; Obaid, S. Intellectual Structure of Knowledge Management: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Journal of Information and Knowledge Management. J. Inf. Knowl. Manag. 2022, 21, 2250001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Valenzuela-Fernández, L.M.; Merigó, J.M.; Nicolas, C.; Kleinaltenkamp, M. Leaders in Industrial Marketing Research: 25 Years of Analysis. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2020, 35, 586–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Niknejad, N.; Ismail, W.; Bahari, M.; Hendradi, R.; Salleh, A.Z. Mapping the Research Trends on Blockchain Technology in Food and Agriculture Industry: A Bibliometric Analysis. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 21, 101272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Fan, D.; Zhu, C.J.; Huang, X.; Kumar, V. Mapping the Terrain of International Human Resource Management Research over the Past Fifty Years: A Bibliographic Analysis. J. World Bus. 2021, 56, 101185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. De Souza, M.P.; Hoeltz, M.; Brittes Benitez, L.; Machado, Ê.L.; de Souza Schneider, R.D.C. Microalgae and Clean Technologies: A Review. Clean Soil Air Water 2019, 47, 1800380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Turzo, T.; Marzi, G.; Favino, C.; Terzani, S. Non-Financial Reporting Research and Practice: Lessons from the Last Decade. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 345, 131154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Andrade-Valbuena, N.A.; Merigo, J.M. Outlining New Product Development Research through Bibliometrics: Analyzing Journals, Articles and Researchers. J. Strategy Manag. 2018, 11, 328–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Gladstone Kombe, G. Overview of Microwave-Assisted Transesterification Technology for Biodiesel Production with Bibliometric Indicators. Biofuels 2022, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Van der Meij, R.J.B.; Edwards, D.J.; Roberts, C.; El-Gohary, H.; Posillico, J. Performance Management within the Dutch Steel Processing Industry. J. Eng. Des. Technol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. De Bruijn, W.; Daams, J.G.; van Hunnik, F.J.G.; Arends, A.J.; Boelens, A.M.; Bosnak, E.M.; Meerveld, J.; Roelands, B.; van Munster, B.C.; Verwey, B.; et al. Physical and Pharmacological Restraints in Hospital Care: Protocol for a Systematic Review. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 10, 921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  189. Shah, S.H.H.; Lei, S.; Ali, M.; Doronin, D.; Hussain, S.T. Prosumption: Bibliometric Analysis Using HistCite and VOSviewer. Kybernetes 2020, 49, 1020–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Saad, R.K.; Al Nsour, M.; Khader, Y.; Al Gunaid, M. Public Health Surveillance Systems in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Literature. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021, 7, e32639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Zeraatkar, N. Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Medical Imaging: A Bibliometric Study in Iran. Iran. J. Nucl. Med. 2013, 21, 81–90. [Google Scholar]
  192. Amirbagheri, K.; Núñez-Carballosa, A.; Guitart-Tarrés, L.; Merigó, J.M. Research on Green Supply Chain: A Bibliometric Analysis. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2019, 21, 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Kamdem, J.P.; Duarte, A.E.; Lima, K.R.R.; Rocha, J.B.T.; Hassan, W.; Barros, L.M.; Roeder, T.; Tsopmo, A. Research Trends in Food Chemistry: A Bibliometric Review of Its 40 Years Anniversary (1976–2016). Food Chem. 2019, 294, 448–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Das, S. Research Trends of E-Learning: A Bibliometric and Visualisation Analysis. Libr. Philos. Pract. 2021, 2021, 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  195. Silva-Santos, J.L.; Mueller, A. Resilience in the Management and Business Research Field: A Bibliometric Analysis. Cuad. Gest. 2022, 22, 61–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Hallinger, P.; Kovačević, J. Science Mapping the Knowledge Base in Educational Leadership and Management: A Longitudinal Bibliometric Analysis, 1960 to 2018. Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh. 2021, 49, 5–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Karamali, M.; Yaghoubi, M.; Parandeh, A. Scientific Mapping of Papers Related to Health Literacy Using Co-Word Analysis in Medline. Iran. J. Health Educ. Health Promot. 2021, 9, 280–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Makabate, C.T.; Musonda, I.; Okoro, C.S.; Chileshe, N. Scientometric Analysis of BIM Adoption by SMEs in the Architecture, Construction and Engineering Sector. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2022, 29, 179–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Winkowska, J.; Szpilko, D.; Pejić, S. Smart City Concept in the Light of the Literature Review. Eng. Manag. Prod. Serv. 2019, 11, 70–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  200. Garrigos-Simon, F.J.; Botella-Carrubi, M.D.; Gonzalez-Cruz, T.F. Social Capital, Human Capital, and Sustainability: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  201. Gil-Doménech, D.; Berbegal-Mirabent, J.; Merigó, J.M. STEM Education: A Bibliometric Overview. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; Volume 894. [Google Scholar]
  202. Mauleon-Mendez, E.; Genovart-Balaguer, J.; Merigo, J.M.; Mulet-Forteza, C. Sustainable Tourism Research towards Twenty-Five Years of the Journal of Sustainable Tourism. Adv. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2018, 6, 23–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Trianni, A.; Merigó, J.M.; Bertoldi, P. Ten Years of Energy Efficiency: A Bibliometric Analysis. Energy Effic. 2018, 11, 1917–1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Mas-Tur, A.; Guijarro, M.; Carrilero, A. The Influence of the Circular Economy: Exploring the Knowledge Base. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  205. Pinto, M.; Isabel Escalona, M.; Pulgarín, A.; Uribe-Tirado, A. The Scientific Production of Ibero-American Authors on Information Literacy (1985–2013). Scientometrics 2015, 102, 1555–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  206. Laengle, S.; Modak, N.M.; Merigó, J.M.; De La Sotta, C. Thirty Years of the International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing: A Bibliometric Analysis. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2018, 31, 1247–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Andrade-Valbuena, N.A.; Valenzuela-Fernández, L.; Merigó, J.M. Thirty-Five Years of Strategic Management Research. A Country Analysis Using Bibliometric Techniques for the 1987-2021 Period. Cuad. De Gest. 2022, 22, 7–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Garrigos-Simon, F.J.; Narangajavana-Kaosiri, Y.; Lengua-Lengua, I. Tourism and Sustainability: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Hannus, V.; Kolbe, T.H. Towards a Common Understanding of Digital Transformation in Agriculture. In Proceedings of the Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI), Proceedings—Series of the Gesellschaft fur Informatik (GI), Bonn, Germany, 8–9 March 2021; Volume P-309, pp. 127–132. [Google Scholar]
  210. Baldock, C. Trends in Gel Dosimetry: Preliminary Bibliometric Overview of Active Growth Areas, Research Trends and Hot Topics from Gore’s 1984 Paper Onwards. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2017, 847, 012072. [Google Scholar]
  211. Baldock, C. Trends in Radiation Dosimetry: Preliminary Overview of Active Growth Areas, Research Trends and Hot Topics from 2011-2015. In Proceedings of the Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Micro-Mini & Nano-Dosimetry & Innovative Technologies in Radiation Therapy (MMND&ITRO2016), Tasmania, Australia, 26–28 January 2016; Volume 777. [Google Scholar]
  212. Mulet-Forteza, C.; Martorell-Cunill, O.; Merigó, J.M.; Genovart-Balaguer, J.; Mauleon-Mendez, E. Twenty Five Years of the Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing: A Bibliometric Ranking. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2018, 35, 1201–1221. [Google Scholar]
  213. Merigó, J.M.; Cobo, M.J.; Laengle, S.; Rivas, D.; Herrera-Viedma, E. Twenty Years of Soft Computing: A Bibliometric Overview. Soft Comput. 2019, 23, 1477–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Rialp, A.; Merigó, J.M.; Cancino, C.A.; Urbano, D. Twenty-Five Years (1992–2016) of the International Business Review: A Bibliometric Overview. Int. Bus. Rev. 2019, 28, 101587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Laengle, S.; Modak, N.M.; Merigo, J.M.; Zurita, G. Twenty-Five Years of Group Decision and Negotiation: A Bibliometric Overview. Group Decis. Negot. 2018, 27, 505–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Baloian, N.; Pino, J.A.; Zurita, G.; Lobos-Ossandon, V.; Maurer, H. Twenty-Five Years of Journal of Universal Computer Science: A Bibliometric Overview. J. Univers. Comput. Sci. 2021, 27, 3–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. La Paz, A.; Merigó, J.M.; Powell, P.; Ramaprasad, A.; Syn, T. Twenty-Five Years of the Information Systems Journal: A Bibliometric and Ontological Overview. Inf. Syst. J. 2020, 30, 431–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  218. Dabić, M.; Vlačić, B.; Scuotto, V.; Warkentin, M. Two Decades of the Journal of Intellectual Capital: A Bibliometric Overview and an Agenda for Future Research. J. Intellect. Cap. 2020, 22, 458–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Pinto, M.; Pulgarín, A.; Escalona, M.I. Viewing Information Literacy Concepts: A Comparison of Two Branches of Knowledge. Scientometrics 2014, 98, 2311–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Zyoud, S.H.; Zyoud, A.H. Visualization and Mapping of Knowledge and Science Landscapes in Expert Systems With Applications Journal: A 30 Years’ Bibliometric Analysis. SAGE Open 2021, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Suban, S.A. Wellness Tourism: A Bibliometric Analysis during 1998–2021. Int. J. Spa Wellness 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Basha, J.S.; Anand, R.B. Effects of Nanoparticle Additive in the Water-Diesel Emulsion Fuel on the Performance, Emission and Combustion Characteristics of a Diesel Engine. Int. J. Veh. Des. 2012, 59, 164–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Mease, J. Kaleido 0.2.1.Post1: Static Image Export for Web-Based Visualization Libraries with Zero Dependencies. Available online: https://libraries.io/pypi/kaleido (accessed on 13 September 2022).
  224. Matplotlib—Visualization with Python. Available online: https://matplotlib.org/ (accessed on 13 September 2022).
  225. NumPy. Available online: https://numpy.org/ (accessed on 13 September 2022).
  226. Pandas—Python Data Analysis Library. Available online: https://pandas.pydata.org/ (accessed on 3 June 2022).
  227. Pillow. Available online: https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/index.html (accessed on 13 September 2022).
  228. Plotly: Low-Code Data App Development. Available online: https://plotly.com/ (accessed on 13 September 2022).
  229. Waskom, M. Seaborn: Statistical Data Visualization. JOSS 2021, 6, 3021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Module: Display—IPython 8.5.0 Documentation. Available online: https://ipython.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/generated/IPython.display.html (accessed on 13 September 2022).
  231. Plotly Express in Python. Available online: https://plotly.com/python/plotly-express/ (accessed on 3 June 2022).
  232. Statsmodels.Stats.Multicomp.Pairwise_tukeyhsd—Statsmodels. Available online: https://www.statsmodels.org/dev/generated/statsmodels.stats.multicomp.pairwise_tukeyhsd.html (accessed on 13 September 2022).
  233. Nieto, J.; Carpintero, Ó.; Miguel, L.J. Less than 2 °C? An Economic-Environmental Evaluation of the Paris Agreement. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 146, 69–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Dey, S.; Reang, N.M.; Das, P.K.; Deb, M. A Comprehensive Study on Prospects of Economy, Environment, and Efficiency of Palm Oil Biodiesel as a Renewable Fuel. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 286, 124981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Jambulingam, R.; Shalma, M.; Shankar, V. Biodiesel Production Using Lipase Immobilised Functionalized Magnetic Nanocatalyst from Oleaginous Fungal Lipid. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 215, 245–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Yan, K.; Lafleur, T.; Jarvis, C.; Wu, G. Clean and Selective Production of γ-Valerolactone from Biomass-Derived Levulinic Acid Catalyzed by Recyclable Pd Nanoparticle Catalyst. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 72, 230–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Negm, N.A.; Betiha, M.A.; Alhumaimess, M.S.; Hassan, H.M.A.; Rabie, A.M. Clean Transesterification Process for Biodiesel Production Using Heterogeneous Polymer-Heteropoly Acid Nanocatalyst. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 238, 117854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Sekar, M.; Praveenkumar, T.R.; Dhinakaran, V.; Gunasekar, P.; Pugazhendhi, A. Combustion and Emission Characteristics of Diesel Engine Fueled with Nanocatalyst and Pyrolysis Oil Produced from the Solid Plastic Waste Using Screw Reactor. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 318, 128551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Janakiraman, S.; Lakshmanan, T.; Chandran, V.; Subramani, L. Comparative Behavior of Various Nano Additives in a DIESEL Engine Powered by Novel Garcinia Gummi-Gutta Biodiesel. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 245, 118940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Akram, F.; Haq, I.u.; Raja, S.I.; Mir, A.S.; Qureshi, S.S.; Aqeel, A.; Shah, F.I. Current Trends in Biodiesel Production Technologies and Future Progressions: A Possible Displacement of the Petro-Diesel. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 370, 133479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Soukht Saraee, H.; Jafarmadar, S.; Sayadi, M.; Parikhani, A.; Kheyrollahi, J.; Pourvosoughi, N. Green Fuel Production from Pistacia Khinjuk and Its Engine Test Analysis as a Promising Alternative. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 156, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Tamjidi, S.; Esmaeili, H.; Moghadas, B.K. Performance of Functionalized Magnetic Nanocatalysts and Feedstocks on Biodiesel Production: A Review Study. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 305, 127200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Basumatary, S.F.; Patir, K.; Das, B.; Saikia, P.; Brahma, S.; Basumatary, B.; Nath, B.; Basumatary, B.; Basumatary, S. Production of Renewable Biodiesel Using Metal Organic Frameworks Based Materials as Efficient Heterogeneous Catalysts. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 358, 131955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Abdullah, B.; Abd Ghani, N.A.; Vo, D.-V.N. Recent Advances in Dry Reforming of Methane over Ni-Based Catalysts. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 162, 170–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  245. Yang, N.; Wang, R. Sustainable Technologies for the Reclamation of Greenhouse Gas CO2. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 103, 784–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Saejung, C.; Raksapon, D.; Chaiyarat, A. Synthesis and Application of a Magnetically Recoverable Biological Nanocomposite Material for Waste Cooking Oil Removal and Commercial Product Recovery in Wastewater Treatment. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 363, 132425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Galadima, A.; Muraza, O. Waste Materials for Production of Biodiesel Catalysts: Technological Status and Prospects. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 263, 121358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. EurObserv’ER Online Database. EurObserv’ER. Available online: https://www.eurobserv-er.org/online-database/ (accessed on 13 September 2022).
  249. Iran Biofuels Production, 1949-2021—Knoema.Com. Available online: https://knoema.com//atlas/Iran/topics/Energy/Renewables/Biofuels-production (accessed on 1 September 2022).
  250. Saudi Arabia Biofuels Production, 1949-2021—Knoema.Com. Available online: https://knoema.com//atlas/Saudi-Arabia/topics/Energy/Renewables/Biofuels-production (accessed on 1 September 2022).
  251. Souza, F.G., Jr. Voyant Tools Corpus from Scopus Biofuel & Nanocatalyst. Available online: https://voyant-tools.org/?corpus=da2bc8877649c4f56d17015bcf59c14b (accessed on 6 June 2022).
  252. Son Le, H.; Said, Z.; Tuan Pham, M.; Hieu Le, T.; Veza, I.; Nhanh Nguyen, V.; Deepanraj, B.; Huong Nguyen, L. Production of HMF and DMF Biofuel from Carbohydrates through Catalytic Pathways as a Sustainable Strategy for the Future Energy Sector. Fuel 2022, 324, 124474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Hoang, A.T.; Pandey, A.; Huang, Z.; Luque, R.; Ng, K.H.; Papadopoulos, A.M.; Chen, W.-H.; Rajamohan, S.; Hadiyanto, H.; Nguyen, X.P.; et al. Catalyst-Based Synthesis of 2,5-Dimethylfuran from Carbohydrates as a Sustainable Biofuel Production Route. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 3079–3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Fiorentino, G.; Ripa, M.; Ulgiati, S. Chemicals from Biomass: Technological versus Environmental Feasibility. A Review. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 2017, 11, 195–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Vinod, N.; Dutta, S. Energy Densification of Biomass-Derived Furfurals to Furanic Biofuels by Catalytic Hydrogenation and Hydrodeoxygenation Reactions. Sustain. Chem. 2021, 2, 521–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Padilla, R.; Koranchalil, S.; Nielsen, M. Homogeneous Catalyzed Valorization of Furanics: A Sustainable Bridge to Fuels and Chemicals. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Xia, J.; Gao, D.; Han, F.; Lv, R.; Waterhouse, G.I.N.; Li, Y. Hydrogenolysis of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural to 2,5-Dimethylfuran Over a Modified CoAl-Hydrotalcite Catalyst. Front. Chem. 2022, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Kumari, N.; Olesen, J.; Pedersen, C.; Bols, M. Synthesis of 5-Bromomethylfurfural from Cellulose as a Potential Intermediate for Biofuel. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 2011, 1266–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Anwar, M.; Rasul, M.; Ashwath, N.; Rahman, M. Optimisation of Second-Generation Biodiesel Production from Australian Native Stone Fruit Oil Using Response Surface Method. Energies 2018, 11, 2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  260. Camilo, J.V.S.; Ferreira, A.Á.G.; Costa, J.A.; Mansur, C.R.E.; de Souza, F.G., Jr. Surface Modeling as a Tool for Constructing Pseudo Ternary Diagrams. Braz. J. Exp. Des. Data Anal. Inferent. Stat. 2021, 1, 151–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Peng, C.; Zhang, X.; Gao, Z.; Wu, J.; Gong, Y. Research on Cooperative Optimization of Multiphase Pump Impeller and Diffuser Based on Adaptive Refined Response Surface Method. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2022, 14, 16878140211072944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Olalo, J.A. Pyrolytic Oil Yield from Waste Plastic in Quezon City, Philippines: Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology. Int. J. Renew. Energy Dev. 2022, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Marri, V.B.; Kotha, M.M.; Gaddale, A.P.R. Production Process Optimisation of Sterculia Foetida Methyl Esters (Biodiesel) Using Response Surface Methodology. Int. J. Ambient Energy 2022, 43, 1837–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Fetimi, A.; Dâas, A.; Merouani, S.; Alswieleh, A.M.; Hamachi, M.; Hamdaoui, O.; Kebiche-Senhadji, O.; Yadav, K.K.; Jeon, B.-H.; Benguerba, Y. Predicting Emulsion Breakdown in the Emulsion Liquid Membrane Process: Optimization through Response Surface Methodology and a Particle Swarm Artificial Neural Network. Chem. Eng. Process.-Process Intensif. 2022, 176, 108956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Helmi, M.; Tahvildari, K.; Hemmati, A.; Safekordi, A. Phosphomolybdic Acid/Graphene Oxide as Novel Green Catalyst Using for Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil via Electrolysis Method: Optimization Using with Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Fuel 2021, 287, 119528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Korkmaz, K.; Tokur, B. Optimization of Hydrolysis Conditions for the Production of Protein Hydrolysates from Fish Wastes Using Response Surface Methodology. Food Biosci. 2022, 45, 101312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Singh, N.K.; Singh, Y.; Sharma, A. Optimization of Biodiesel Synthesis from Jojoba Oil via Supercritical Methanol: A Response Surface Methodology Approach Coupled with Genetic Algorithm. Biomass Bioenergy 2022, 156, 106332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Kumar, S.; Deswal, V. Optimization at Low Temperature Transesterification Biodiesel Production from Soybean Oil Methanolysis via Response Surface Methodology. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2022, 44, 2284–2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Saedpanah, B.; Behroozi-Khazaei, N.; Khorshidi, J. Modeling and Optimization of Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Rosemary Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Iran. Food Sci. Technol. Res. J. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  270. Muhammad, G.; Ngatcha, A.D.P.; Lv, Y.; Xiong, W.; El-Badry, Y.A.; Asmatulu, E.; Xu, J.; Alam, M.A. Enhanced Biodiesel Production from Wet Microalgae Biomass Optimized via Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Network. Renew. Energy 2022, 184, 753–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Pagaimo, J.; Magalhães, H.; Costa, J.N.; Ambrosio, J. Derailment Study of Railway Cargo Vehicles Using a Response Surface Methodology. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 2022, 60, 309–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Bansod, P.; Kodape, S.; Bhasarkar, J.; Bhutada, D. Ceramic Membranes (Al2O3/TiO2) Used for Separation Glycerol from Biodiesel Using Response Surface Methodology. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 57, 1101–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Arora, K.; Kaur, P.; Kumar, P.; Singh, A.; Patel, S.K.S.; Li, X.; Yang, Y.-H.; Bhatia, S.K.; Kulshrestha, S. Valorization of Wastewater Resources Into Biofuel and Value-Added Products Using Microalgal System. Front. Energy Res. 2021, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Bibi, F.; Jamal, A.; Huang, Z.; Urynowicz, M.; Ishtiaq Ali, M. Advancement and Role of Abiotic Stresses in Microalgae Biorefinery with a Focus on Lipid Production. Fuel 2022, 316, 123192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Kant Bhatia, S.; Ahuja, V.; Chandel, N.; Mehariya, S.; Kumar, P.; Vinayak, V.; Saratale, G.D.; Raj, T.; Kim, S.-H.; Yang, Y.-H. An Overview on Microalgal-Bacterial Granular Consortia for Resource Recovery and Wastewater Treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 351, 127028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  276. Rehman, M.; Kesharvani, S.; Dwivedi, G.; Gidwani Suneja, K. Impact of Cultivation Conditions on Microalgae Biomass Productivity and Lipid Content. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 56, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Brindhadevi, K.; Mathimani, T.; Rene, E.R.; Shanmugam, S.; Chi, N.T.L.; Pugazhendhi, A. Impact of Cultivation Conditions on the Biomass and Lipid in Microalgae with an Emphasis on Biodiesel. Fuel 2021, 284, 119058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Darvehei, P.; Bahri, P.A.; Moheimani, N.R. Model Development for the Growth of Microalgae: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 97, 233–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Kumar Patel, A.; Tseng, Y.-S.; Rani Singhania, R.; Chen, C.-W.; Chang, J.-S.; Di Dong, C. Novel Application of Microalgae Platform for Biodesalination Process: A Review. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 337, 125343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Moreira, J.B.; Kuntzler, S.G.; Bezerra, P.Q.M.; Cassuriaga, A.P.A.; Zaparoli, M.; da Silva, J.L.V.; Costa, J.A.V.; de Morais, M.G. Recent Advances of Microalgae Exopolysaccharides for Application as Bioflocculants. Polysaccharides 2022, 3, 264–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Lim, H.R.; Khoo, K.S.; Chia, W.Y.; Chew, K.W.; Ho, S.-H.; Show, P.L. Smart Microalgae Farming with Internet-of-Things for Sustainable Agriculture. Biotechnol. Adv. 2022, 57, 107931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Chandel, N.; Ahuja, V.; Gurav, R.; Kumar, V.; Tyagi, V.K.; Pugazhendhi, A.; Kumar, G.; Kumar, D.; Yang, Y.-H.; Bhatia, S.K. Progress in Microalgal Mediated Bioremediation Systems for the Removal of Antibiotics and Pharmaceuticals from Wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 825, 153895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Mondal, S.; Bera, S.; MishraRoy, R. Redefining the Role of Microalgae in Industrial Wastewater Remediation. Energy Nexus 2022, 6, 100088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Maity, J.; Hou, C.-P.; Majumder, D.; Bundschuh, J.; Kulp, T.; Chen, C.-Y.; Chuang, L.-T.; Chen, N.; Jean, J.-S.; Yang, T.-C.; et al. The Production of Biofuel and Bioelectricity Associated with Wastewater Treatment by Green Algae. Energy 2014, 78, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Cheng, S.; Wei, L.; Alsowij, M.; Corbin, F.; Boakye, E.; Gu, Z.; Raynie, D.; Cheng, S.; Wei, L.; Alsowij, M.; et al. Catalytic Hydrothermal Liquefaction (HTL) of Biomass for Bio-Crude Production Using Ni/HZSM-5 Catalysts. AIMSES 2017, 4, 417–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Zhang, L.; Rao, T.U.; Wang, J.; Ren, D.; Sirisommboonchai, S.; Choi, C.; Machida, H.; Huo, Z.; Norinaga, K. A Review of Thermal Catalytic and Electrochemical Hydrogenation Approaches for Converting Biomass-Derived Compounds to High-Value Chemicals and Fuels. Fuel Process. Technol. 2022, 226, 107097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Zhang, L.; Bao, Z.; Xia, S.; Lu, Q.; Walters, K.B. Catalytic Pyrolysis of Biomass and Polymer Wastes. Catalysts 2018, 8, 659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  288. Li, Q.; Faramarzi, A.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Y.; Hu, X.; Gholizadeh, M. Progress in Catalytic Pyrolysis of Municipal Solid Waste. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 226, 113525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Zuorro, A.; García-Martínez, J.B.; Barajas-Solano, A.F. The Application of Catalytic Processes on the Production of Algae-Based Biofuels: A Review. Catalysts 2021, 11, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Yao, W.; Li, J.; Feng, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Q.; Komarneni, S.; Wang, Y. Thermally Stable Phosphorus and Nickel Modified ZSM-5 Zeolites for Catalytic Co-Pyrolysis of Biomass and Plastics. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 30485–30494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Cheng, S.; Wei, L.; Julson, J.; Muthukumarappan, K.; Kharel, P. Upgrading Pyrolysis Bio-Oil to Hydrocarbon Enriched Biofuel over Bifunctional Fe-Ni/HZSM-5 Catalyst in Supercritical Methanol. Fuel Process. Technol. 2017, 167, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Qian, L.; Zhao, B.; Wang, H.; Bao, G.; Hu, Y.; Charles Xu, C.; Long, H. Valorization of the Spent Catalyst from Flue Gas Denitrogenation by Improving Bio-Oil Production from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Pinewood Sawdust. Fuel 2022, 312, 122804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Xu, S.; Minteer, S.D. Enzymatic Biofuel Cell for Oxidation of Glucose to CO2. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Zhao, P.; Zhang, H.; Sun, X.; Hao, S.; Dong, S. A Hybrid Bioelectrochemical Device Based on Glucose/O2 Enzymatic Biofuel Cell for Energy Conversion and Storage. Electrochim. Acta 2022, 420, 140440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Cai, Y.; Wang, M.; Xiao, X.; Liang, B.; Fan, S.; Zheng, Z.; Cosnier, S.; Liu, A. A Membraneless Starch/O2 Biofuel Cell Based on Bacterial Surface Regulable Displayed Sequential Enzymes of Glucoamylase and Glucose Dehydrogenase. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 207, 114197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  296. Zhang, Y.; Hao, S.; Sun, X.; Zhang, H.; Ma, Q.; Zhai, J.; Dong, S. A Self-Powered Glucose Biosensor Based on Mediator-Free Hybrid Cu/Glucose Biofuel Cell for Flow Sensing of Glucose. Electroanalysis 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Banerjee, S.; Slaughter, G. A Tattoo-like Glucose Abiotic Biofuel Cell. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2022, 904, 115941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Yimamumaimaiti, T.; Su, Q.; Song, R.; Gao, Y.; Yu, S.; Tan, T.; Wang, L.; Zhu, J.-J.; Zhang, J.-R. Damage-Free and Time-Saving Platform Integrated by a Flow Membrane Separation Device and a Dual-Target Biofuel Cell-Based Biosensor for Continuous Sorting and Detection of Exosomes and Host Cells in Human Serum. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 7722–7730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Li, G.; Wu, Z.; Xu, C.; Hu, Z. Hybrid Catalyst Cascade for Enhanced Oxidation of Glucose in Glucose/Air Biofuel Cell. Bioelectrochemistry 2022, 143, 107983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. Mollaamin, F.; Kandemirli, F.; Mohammadian, N.T.; Monajjemi, M. Molecular Modeling of Biofuel Cells of BN Nanotube-FAD Structure. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 2022, 96, S105–S112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Ji, J.; Kim, S.; Chung, Y.; Kwon, Y. Polydopamine Mediator for Glucose Oxidation Reaction and Its Use for Membraneless Enzymatic Biofuel Cells. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  302. Haque, S.u.; Duteanu, N.; Nasar, A. Inamuddin Polythiophene-Titanium Oxide (PTH-TiO2) Nanocomposite: As an Electron Transfer Enhancer for Biofuel Cell Anode Construction. J. Power Sources 2022, 520, 230867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Huang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Deng, X.; Li, J.; Huang, S.; Jin, X.; Zhu, X. Self-Encapsulated Enzyme through in-Situ Growth of Polypyrrole for High-Performance Enzymatic Biofuel Cell. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 429, 132148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Hui, Y.; Wang, H.; Zuo, W.; Ma, X. Spider Nest Shaped Multi-Scale Three-Dimensional Enzymatic Electrodes for Glucose/Oxygen Biofuel Cells. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2022, 47, 6187–6199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. Cipolletta, M.; D’Ambrosio, M.; Casson Moreno, V.; Cozzani, V. Enhancing the Sustainability of Biodiesel Fuels by Inherently Safer Production Processes. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 344, 131075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Ogunkunle, O.; Ahmed, N.A. Overview of Biodiesel Combustion in Mitigating the Adverse Impacts of Engine Emissions on the Sustainable Human–Environment Scenario. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  307. Manigandan, S.; Gunasekar, P.; Nithya, S.; Devipriya, J. Effects of Nanoadditives on Emission Characteristics of Engine Fuelled with Biodiesel. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2020, 42, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  308. Wu, G.; Jiang, G.; Yang, Z.; Huang, Z. Emission Characteristics for Waste Cooking Oil Biodiesel Blend in a Marine Diesel Propulsion Engine. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2019, 28, 2911–2921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  309. Wai, P.; Karin, P.; Phairote, W.; Chollacoop, N.; Kosaka, H.; Po-ngen, W. Experimental Investigation of the Impact Ethanol-Biodiesel-Diesel Blended Fuels on Combustion, Emission, and Performance of Compression Ignition Diesel Engine. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 66, 2830–2835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Zheng, F.; Cho, H.M. Effect of Additive on Performance and Exhaust Characteristics of Biodiesel Engines—A Review. Spec. Ugdym. 2022, 1, 6601–6617. [Google Scholar]
  311. Karpanai Selvan, B.; Das, S.; Chandrasekar, M.; Girija, R.; John Vennison, S.; Jaya, N.; Saravanan, P.; Rajasimman, M.; Vasseghian, Y.; Rajamohan, N. Utilization of Biodiesel Blended Fuel in a Diesel Engine—Combustion Engine Performance and Emission Characteristics Study. Fuel 2022, 311, 122621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  312. Ge, J.C.; Wu, G.; Choi, N.J. Comparative Study of Pilot–Main Injection Timings and Diesel/Ethanol Binary Blends on Combustion, Emission and Microstructure of Particles Emitted from Diesel Engines. Fuel 2022, 313, 122658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  313. Ge, J.C.; Wu, G.; Yoo, B.-O.; Choi, N.J. Effect of Injection Timing on Combustion, Emission and Particle Morphology of an Old Diesel Engine Fueled with Ternary Blends at Low Idling Operations. Energy 2022, 253, 124150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Kalil Rahiman, M.; Santhoshkumar, S.; Subramaniam, D.; Avinash, A.; Pugazhendhi, A. Effects of Oxygenated Fuel Pertaining to Fuel Analysis on Diesel Engine Combustion and Emission Characteristics. Energy 2022, 239, 122373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  315. De Farias, M.S.; Schlosser, J.F.; Estrada, J.S.; Perin, G.F.; Martini, A.T. Emissions of an Agricultural Engine Using Blends of Diesel and Hydrous Ethanol. Semin. Ciências Agrárias 2019, 40, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  316. Emma, A.F.; Alangar, S.; Yadav, A.K. Extraction and Characterization of Coffee Husk Biodiesel and Investigation of Its Effect on Performance, Combustion, and Emission Characteristics in a Diesel Engine. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2022, 14, 100214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  317. Tipanluisa, L.; Thakkar, K.; Fonseca, N.; López, J.-M. Investigation of Diesel/n-Butanol Blends as Drop-in Fuel for Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines: Combustion, Performance, and Emissions. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 255, 115334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  318. Zhang, Z.; Tian, J.; Li, J.; Lv, J.; Wang, S.; Zhong, Y.; Dong, R.; Gao, S.; Cao, C.; Tan, D. Investigation on Combustion, Performance and Emission Characteristics of a Diesel Engine Fueled with Diesel/Alcohol/n-Butanol Blended Fuels. Fuel 2022, 320, 123975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  319. Zhang, Z.; Tian, J.; Xie, G.; Li, J.; Xu, W.; Jiang, F.; Huang, Y.; Tan, D. Investigation on the Combustion and Emission Characteristics of Diesel Engine Fueled with Diesel/Methanol/n-Butanol Blends. Fuel 2022, 314, 123088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  320. Nalla, B.T.; Devarajan, Y.; Subbiah, G.; Sharma, D.K.; Krishnamurthy, V.; Mishra, R. Investigations of Combustion, Performance, and Emission Characteristics in a Diesel Engine Fueled with Prunus Domestica Methyl Ester and N-butanol Blends. Env. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  321. Jayabal, R.; Subramani, S.; Dillikannan, D.; Devarajan, Y.; Thangavelu, L.; Nedunchezhiyan, M.; Kaliyaperumal, G.; De Poures, M.V. Multi-Objective Optimization of Performance and Emission Characteristics of a CRDI Diesel Engine Fueled with Sapota Methyl Ester/Diesel Blends. Energy 2022, 250, 123709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  322. Huang, Z.; Huang, J.; Luo, J.; Hu, D.; Yin, Z. Performance Enhancement and Emission Reduction of a Diesel Engine Fueled with Different Biodiesel-Diesel Blending Fuel Based on the Multi-Parameter Optimization Theory. Fuel 2022, 314, 122753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  323. Zhang, Z.; Li, J.; Tian, J.; Dong, R.; Zou, Z.; Gao, S.; Tan, D. Performance, Combustion and Emission Characteristics Investigations on a Diesel Engine Fueled with Diesel/ Ethanol /n-Butanol Blends. Energy 2022, 249, 123733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  324. Ma, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Liang, J.; Yang, C. The Performance and Emissions Characteristics of Diesel/Biodiesel/Alcohol Blends in a Diesel Engine. Energy Rep. 2021, 7, 1016–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  325. Dutta, S.; Wu, K.C.-W. Enzymatic Breakdown of Biomass: Enzyme Active Sites, Immobilization, and Biofuel Production. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 4615–4626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  326. Lu, X. A Perspective: Photosynthetic Production of Fatty Acid-Based Biofuels in Genetically Engineered Cyanobacteria. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28, 742–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  327. Yue, H.; Ling, C.; Yang, T.; Chen, X.; Chen, Y.; Deng, H.; Wu, Q.; Chen, J.; Chen, G.-Q. A Seawater-Based Open and Continuous Process for Polyhydroxyalkanoates Production by Recombinant Halomonas Campaniensis LS21 Grown in Mixed Substrates. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2014, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  328. Liu, T.; Khosla, C. Genetic Engineering of Escherichia Coli for Biofuel Production. Annu Rev Genet 2010, 44, 53–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  329. Hegde, K.; Chandra, N.; Sarma, S.J.; Brar, S.K.; Veeranki, V.D. Genetic Engineering Strategies for Enhanced Biodiesel Production. Mol. Biotechnol. 2015, 57, 606–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  330. Paudel, S.; Menze, M. Genetic Engineering, a Hope for Sustainable Biofuel Production: Review. Int. J. Environ. 2014, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  331. Yan, J.; Yan, Y.; Madzak, C.; Han, B. Harnessing Biodiesel-Producing Microbes: From Genetic Engineering of Lipase to Metabolic Engineering of Fatty Acid Biosynthetic Pathway. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2017, 37, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  332. Paul, M.; Mohapatra, S.; Kumar Das Mohapatra, P.; Thatoi, H. Microbial Cellulases—An Update towards Its Surface Chemistry, Genetic Engineering and Recovery for Its Biotechnological Potential. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 340, 125710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  333. Turner, P.; Mamo, G.; Karlsson, E.N. Potential and Utilization of Thermophiles and Thermostable Enzymes in Biorefining. Microb. Cell Factories 2007, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  334. Subramaniam, M.; Solomon, J.M.; Arockia Dhanraj, J.; Ramaian, C.P.; Vinayagam, N.; Selvaraju, N.; Ramana Johannes Bachmann, A. Performance Enhancement of Jatropha Methyl Ester by Utilizing Oxygen Enrichment in Diesel Engine. In Technology Innovation in Mechanical Engineering: Select Proceedings of TIME 2021; Chaurasiya, P.K., Singh, A., Verma, T.N., Rajak, U., Eds.; Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2022; pp. 261–271. ISBN 9789811679094. [Google Scholar]
  335. Kishore, N.P.; Gugulothu, S.K. Effect of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Blended Concentration on Performance, Combustion and Emission Characteristics of CRDI Diesel Engine Running on Mahua Methyl Ester Biodiesel. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. C 2022, 103, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  336. Masthan Shareef, S.; Kumar Mohanty, D. Experimental Investigation of Emission Characteristics of Compression Ignition Engines Using Dairy Scum Biodiesel. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 56, 1484–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  337. Aghbashlo, M.; Tabatabaei, M.; Mohammadi, P.; Mirzajanzadeh, M.; Ardjmand, M.; Rashidi, A. Effect of an Emission-Reducing Soluble Hybrid Nanocatalyst in Diesel/Biodiesel Blends on Exergetic Performance of a DI Diesel Engine. Renew. Energy 2016, 93, 353–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  338. Fayad, M.A.; AL-Salihi, H.A.; Dhahad, H.A.; Mohammed, F.M.; AL-Ogidi, B.R. Effect of Post-Injection and Alternative Fuels on Combustion, Emissions and Soot Nanoparticles Characteristics in a Common-Rail Direct Injection Diesel Engine. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2021, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  339. Fayad, M.A. Effect of Renewable Fuel and Injection Strategies on Combustion Characteristics and Gaseous Emissions in Diesel Engines. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2020, 42, 460–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  340. Fayad, M.A.; AL-Ogaidi, B.R.; Abood, M.K.; AL-Salihi, H.A. Influence of Post-Injection Strategies and CeO2 Nanoparticles Additives in the C30D Blends and Diesel on Engine Performance, NOX Emissions, and PM Characteristics in Diesel Engine. Part. Sci. Technol. 2021, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  341. Kumar, N.; Raheman, H. Thermal and Environmental Performance of CI Engine Using CeO2 Nanoparticles as Additive in Water–Diesel–Biodiesel Fuel Blend. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 19, 3287–3304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  342. Yu, A.-Q.; Pratomo Juwono, N.K.; Leong, S.S.J.; Chang, M.W. Production of Fatty Acid-Derived Valuable Chemicals in Synthetic Microbes. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2014, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  343. González-García, Y.; Rábago-Panduro, L.M.; French, T.; Camacho-Córdova, D.I.; Gutiérrez-González, P.; Córdova, J. High Lipids Accumulation in Rhodosporidium Toruloides by Applying Single and Multiple Nutrients Limitation in a Simple Chemically Defined Medium. Ann. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 519–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  344. Ochsenreither, K.; Glück, C.; Stressler, T.; Fischer, L.; Syldatk, C. Production Strategies and Applications of Microbial Single Cell Oils. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  345. Lakshmidevi, R.; Ramakrishnan, B.; Ratha, S.K.; Bhaskar, S.; Chinnasamy, S. Valorisation of Molasses by Oleaginous Yeasts for Single Cell Oil (SCO) and Carotenoids Production. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 21, 101281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  346. Fabiszewska, A.; Wierzchowska, K.; Nowak, D.; Wołoszynowska, M.; Zieniuk, B. Brine and Post-Frying Oil Management in the Fish Processing Industry—A Concept Based on Oleaginous Yeast Culture. Processes 2022, 10, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  347. Zainuddin, M.F.; Fai, C.K.; Mohamed, M.S.; Rahman, N.A.A.; Halim, M. Production of Single Cell Oil by Yarrowia Lipolytica JCM 2320 Using Detoxified Desiccated Coconut Residue Hydrolysate. PeerJ 2022, 10, e12833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  348. Saini, J.K.; Sani, R.K. (Eds.) Microbial Biotechnology for Renewable and Sustainable Energy; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  349. Sajish, S.; Singh, S.; Nain, L. Yeasts for Single Cell Oil Production from Non-Conventional Bioresources. In Microbial Biotechnology for Renewable and Sustainable Energy; Saini, J.K., Sani, R.K., Eds.; Clean Energy Production Technologies; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2022; pp. 337–364. ISBN 9789811638527. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Logical diagram of the developed software.
Figure 1. Logical diagram of the developed software.
Materials 16 01175 g001
Figure 2. Documents per year (The model does not include 2022).
Figure 2. Documents per year (The model does not include 2022).
Materials 16 01175 g002
Figure 3. Documents per subject area.
Figure 3. Documents per subject area.
Materials 16 01175 g003
Figure 4. Documents per country.
Figure 4. Documents per country.
Materials 16 01175 g004
Figure 5. The word cloud from titles and abstracts.
Figure 5. The word cloud from titles and abstracts.
Materials 16 01175 g005
Figure 6. VOS map from titles and abstracts.
Figure 6. VOS map from titles and abstracts.
Materials 16 01175 g006
Figure 7. VOS overlay map from titles and abstracts.
Figure 7. VOS overlay map from titles and abstracts.
Materials 16 01175 g007
Figure 8. Top five nodes per cluster.
Figure 8. Top five nodes per cluster.
Materials 16 01175 g008
Figure 9. Relevant data from Table 1 sorted by LSBI.
Figure 9. Relevant data from Table 1 sorted by LSBI.
Materials 16 01175 g009
Table 1. Main information from software containing the top five LSBI and top five most recent linked terms.
Table 1. Main information from software containing the top five LSBI and top five most recent linked terms.
Top Five Link Strength between Terms
Terms (t.1 vs. t.2)LSBI ↓Years (t.1 vs. t.2)E.D.
1. dmf vs. hmf2342019.77 (t.1) vs. 2018.86 (t.2)0.08
2. dimethylfuran vs. dmf1252019.84 (t.1) vs. 2019.77 (t.2)0.03
3. blend vs. diesel1182019.99 (t.1) vs. 2020.16 (t.2)0.04
4. dimethylfuran vs. hmf1152019.84 (t.1) vs. 2018.86 (t.2)0.11
5. htl vs. hydrothermal liquefaction1122018.89 (t.1) vs. 2019.16 (t.2)0.05
Top five most recent linked terms
Terms (t.1 vs. t.2)LSBIYears (t.1 vs. t.2) ↓E.D.
6. cnwedb vs. egt102022.0 (t.1) vs. 2022.0 (t.2)0.13
7. egt vs. scp42022.0 (t.1) vs. 2021.67 (t.2)0.69
8. oleaginous yeast vs. sco162022.0 (t.1) vs. 2021.44 (t.2)0.26
9. egt vs. exhaust gas temperature42022.0 (t.1) vs. 2021.4 (t.2)0.13
10. cnwedb vs. exhaust gas temperature52022.0 (t.1) vs. 2021.4 (t.2)0.26
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gomes Souza, F., Jr.; Pal, K.; Ampah, J.D.; Dantas, M.C.; Araújo, A.; Maranhão, F.; Domingues, P. Biofuels and Nanocatalysts: Python Boosting Visualization of Similarities. Materials 2023, 16, 1175. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16031175

AMA Style

Gomes Souza F Jr., Pal K, Ampah JD, Dantas MC, Araújo A, Maranhão F, Domingues P. Biofuels and Nanocatalysts: Python Boosting Visualization of Similarities. Materials. 2023; 16(3):1175. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16031175

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gomes Souza, Fernando, Jr., Kaushik Pal, Jeffrey Dankwa Ampah, Maria Clara Dantas, Aruzza Araújo, Fabíola Maranhão, and Priscila Domingues. 2023. "Biofuels and Nanocatalysts: Python Boosting Visualization of Similarities" Materials 16, no. 3: 1175. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16031175

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop