Next Article in Journal
Electrochemical Properties of Multilayered Sn/TiNi Shape-Memory-Alloy Thin-Film Electrodes for High-Performance Anodes in Li-Ion Batteries
Next Article in Special Issue
Preliminary Study of the Fresh and Hard Properties of UHPC That Is Used to Produce 3D Printed Mortar
Previous Article in Journal
In Situ TEM Study of Structural Changes in Na-β″-Alumina Using Electron Beam Irradiation
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Cement Type on the Properties of Plastering Mortars Modified with Cellulose Ether Admixture
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Fly Ash Application as Supplementary Cementitious Material: A Review

1
Luohe Vocational Technology College, Luohe 462300, China
2
Department of Civil Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad 22060, Pakistan
3
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195291 St. Petersburg, Russia
4
Department of Machinery Parts and Theory of Mechanisms, Moscow Automobile and Road Construction University, 125319 Moscow, Russia
5
Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering in Al-Kharj, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
6
Building & Construction Technology Department, Bayan College of Science and Technology, Khartoum 11115, Sudan
7
Structural Engineering and Construction Management, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Future University in Egypt, New Cairo 11845, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(7), 2664; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15072664
Submission received: 1 March 2022 / Revised: 24 March 2022 / Accepted: 25 March 2022 / Published: 5 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Binders for Construction Materials)

Abstract

:
This study aimed to expand the knowledge on the application of the most common industrial byproduct, i.e., fly ash, as a supplementary cementitious material. The characteristics of cement-based composites containing fly ash as supplementary cementitious material were discussed. This research evaluated the mechanical, durability, and microstructural properties of FA-based concrete. Additionally, the various factors affecting the aforementioned properties are discussed, as well as the limitations associated with the use of FA in concrete. The addition of fly ash as supplementary cementitious material has a favorable impact on the material characteristics along with the environmental benefits; however, there is an optimum level of its inclusion (up to 20%) beyond which FA has a deleterious influence on the composite’s performance. The evaluation of the literature identified potential solutions to the constraints and directed future research toward the application of FA in higher amounts. The delayed early strength development is one of the key downsides of FA use in cementitious composites. This can be overcome by chemical activation (alkali/sulphate) and the addition of nanomaterials, allowing for high-volume use of FA. By utilizing FA as an SCM, sustainable development may promote by lowering CO2 emissions, conserving natural resources, managing waste effectively, reducing environmental pollution, and low hydration heat.

1. Introduction

Industrial solid waste makes up a sizable portion of human-generated wastes, which come in a vast range of forms and are highly complex in nature [1,2,3]. Heavy metals are found in the majority of industrial wastes, such as red powder, metal cleaning, and radioactive waste [4,5,6]. Inappropriate handling of solid industrial waste can lead to leachate penetrating soil and groundwater, causing environmental irreversibility and endangering human health [7,8,9]; moreover, global warming and climate change are the two most serious environmental problems caused by CO2 emissions [10,11,12]. The construction industry substantially impacts the environment, accounting for a significant portion of CO2 emissions [13,14,15]. Each ton of cement produced emits about 0.8 tons of CO2 [16,17,18], and cement production is increasing globally [19] due to the increasing demand for concrete [20,21,22]. Researchers worldwide are constantly on the lookout for new materials that can be utilized in place of, or in addition to, cement [23]. Since the last decade, the application of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) such as silica fume, fly ash (FA), slags, etc., as a cement replacement has been emphasized [24,25,26]. SCMs hydrate cement hydraulically or pozzolanically in pore solution [27,28,29]. Thus, utilizing industrial solid waste in construction as SCMs is an effective approach for eco-friendly construction [30]; it could reduce cement demand, reduce CO2 emission, and solve waste management problems. From the various kinds of industrial byproducts that can be used as SCMs, the most common is FA.
FA is a byproduct of coal combustion that is accumulated at the top of boilers, particularly in coal-fired power plants [31,32]. The omitted mineral particles or mineral materials within the coal liquefy, evaporate, consolidate, or agglomerate during/after burning. By rapidly cooling in the post-combustion portion, sphere-shaped, amorphous FA grains are created due to surface tension force. When the entrapped volatile matter reaches a high temperature, it expands inside, forming a hollow cenosphere. Some residues may crystallize, while others may become glassy, reliant on the composition of residues and the heating/cooling circumstances [33]. FA is considered an SCM that is used in place of cement in cementitious materials [34,35]. FA increases workability, decreases the hydration heat, and thermal cracking in cementitious materials at initial ages, and improves the mechanical and durability characteristics of cementitious composites, mostly at later ages [36,37]. The application of FA is also being investigated in the manufacture of geopolymer concrete [38,39,40]; however, this study is limited to reviewing their utilization in cementitious composites.
The amorphous silica in FA reacts with the calcium hydroxide to form calcium-silicate-hydrate (CSH) [41]. FA’s pozzolanic reaction boosts its utility not only in concrete but also in a variety of other construction applications [42]. Due to the pozzolanic process, the strength gain lasts significantly longer than with normal concrete [43]. Additionally, FA increases the workability of concrete by reducing bleeding [44]. FA has been shown to improve the long-term compressive strength (CS) of normal and recycled aggregate concrete [45]. Microstructural examination of FA samples following early curing reveals an abundance of un-hydrated spherical FA particles. Despite this, after a year of curing, the microstructure of FA samples appeared to be very compact, with no evidence of dehydrated FA particles [46]. FA requires a longer period of time to hydrate. As a result, during the initial phases of curing, low CS has been found. The strength development of FA, on the other hand, is dependent on its chemical and physical characteristics. It has been observed that FA with a fine particle size distribution had a better CS than FA with a coarse particle size distribution [47]. The binder causes the concrete to shrink during the hydration process, and excessive shrinkage can result in severe cracks in the concrete structure. FA is beneficial for shrinkage mitigation [48]. It has been noted that the use of large volume FA in concrete, specifically 50% replacement of cement with FA, resulted in a 30% reduction in shrinkage when compared to ordinary concrete [49].
The use of FA in low (<30%) and high (>30%) volume in concrete is a pioneering move that has already altered the worldwide concrete industry’s approach. Mostly, FA is disposed of in landfills, which has had severe implications, the majority of its portion has been successfully utilized in the concrete industry for the last three to four decades. Additionally, the frequent generation of FA has compelled government officials and experts to develop a more dependable method of consuming it, while the application of FA to the development of sustainable concretes will almost certainly alter the future building industry [50,51,52]. Even though FA has been extensively investigated over the last few decades, experts have discovered some inconsistent results regarding the mechanical and durability characteristics of concrete. The chemical and physical features of FA have a major effect on the mechanical and durability characteristics of concrete. Additionally, the characteristics of FA vary depending on the source. This study focused on reviewing the mechanical, durability, and microstructural characteristics of FA-based concrete; the various factors influencing the aforesaid properties are highlighted, and limitations associated with the use of FA in concrete are described. Based on the review of the literature, possible solutions to the limitations are provided, and future research is directed to the application of FA in larger quantities.

2. Properties of Fly Ash

2.1. Physical and Chemical Properties

FA is a primary solid waste generated by coal-fired energy plants, and these plants are looking for economically viable ways to dispose of it. FA particles are generally spherical, solid/hollow in nature, mainly glassy (amorphous), with particle sizes varying from <1 µm to 150 µm [53,54,55]. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of the FA are shown in Figure 1. FA has a specific gravity of 2.1 to 3.0 [56] and a specific surface area of 170 to 1000 m2/kg [57]. FA can range in color from tan to grey to black, based on the quantity of unburned carbon present [35,58]. Besides the environmental advantages of waste disposal and CO2 reduction [59,60], FA increases workability [61], decreases the hydration heat and thermal cracking in concrete at the initial stage [62], and improves the performance of cementitious materials, especially at later stages [36,63]. Regardless of the advantages of FA, 100% application of FA is not possible due to a variety of reported limitations [64]. The ASTM categorizes FA into two categories: “C” and “F” [65]. FA classified as “Class F” is mostly generated by burning anthracite or bituminous coal containing SiO2, Al2O3, and Fe2O3 concentrations greater than 70%. While “Class C” FA is generated by burning lignite or sub-bituminous coal that consists of 50% to 70% of the aforementioned chemicals [66]. Class F is a typical pozzolan and composed of silicate glass that has been modified with aluminum and iron [67]. CaO amount is less than 10% in “Class F” FA [68]; thus, to form CSH through pozzolanic reaction, Ca(OH)2 formed during cement hydration is required; therefore, the chemical composition of FA performs a major part in determining its performance in cementitious composites [69]. The range of element oxide concentrations found in “Class F” and “Class C” FA has been listed in Table 1. As can be seen, there is a considerable difference in the element oxides contained within a single kind of FA, which might be ascribed to differences in source, processing conditions, and so on. There is a crucial need to utilize more FA in the construction materials due to the increase in FA production globally.

2.2. Cementing Efficiency and Pozzolanic Properties

Smith [72] proposed the notion of cementing factor (k) in order to develop a reasonable approach for incorporating FA into cement/concrete. Cementing efficiency can be employed to ascertain the overall quality, durability, and performance of composites. In general, FA has a low cementing efficiency at initial stages and acts more such as filler, but the pozzolanic feature turns out to be efficient at later ages, causing a significant increase in strength [73,74,75]. This clearly indicates that the pozzolanic reaction improves the cementing efficiency of FA with age. According to Smith [72], “the FA mass might be considered similar to the cement mass in terms of CS development.” In other words, “k” is a factor that accounts for the variation among the contribution of cement to the development of a particular property and the contribution of mineral admixtures. CS tests are frequently used to measure this cementing efficiency due to their simplicity and repeatability. The “k” value of FA is determined by a variety of its intrinsic qualities, including physical properties such as particle size, distribution, and shape, as well as chemical composition [76]. Additionally, it was also reported that the “k” factor is dependent on other parameters such as the curing time, the concrete strength, and the FA type [77]; therefore, it was also discovered that the “k” value is dependent on external factors such as the water/cement ratio (w/c). They stated that for conventional FA, “k” is a function of the w/c and that the cementing efficiency of FA tends to decline as the w/c increases [78]. On the contrary, Smith [72] asserted that it is unaffected by the w/c.
Apart from cementing efficiency, pozzolanicity is another critical term in the context of FA concrete. Among the numerous favorable benefits of FA in cement/concrete, the pozzolanic effect is believed to be the most important [66]. The pozzolanic reaction is mostly dependent on the Al2O3 and SiO2 content of FA and is stimulated by the Portlandite generated during cement hydration to generate a more hydrated gel. This gel plugs the capillary pores in the matrix, increasing its strength [79]. As a result, FA’s reactivity is greatly dependent on its chemical properties; however, all pozzolanic materials are made of aluminosilicate glass that combines with Ca(OH)2 formed during hydration of cement to yield hydration products [80].

3. Properties of Composites Containing Fly Ash

3.1. Workability

FA has plasticizing properties that improve the workability of the composites [81]. Lee et al. [82] reported the subsequent factors as possible reasons for FA’s plasticizing effect. Firstly, increased composite volume due to FA’s lower density than cement. Secondly, FA decreases the flocculation of cement grains because of the dilution effect. Thirdly, the slower reaction rate of FA reduces hydration product growth at the initial time. Besides these causes, the spherical shape of FA grains facilitates the movement of nearby particles by the ball bearing effect, particularly at high replacement levels. Thus, FA can be a more cost-effective method with a low environmental effect to increase the workability than chemical superplasticizer [83]. Bentz et al. [84] also validated the positive impact of FA on the workability of the mix. The type of FA used also has a substantial impact on the workability of composites. According to Ponikiewski and Golaszewski [85], high calcium FA has a detrimental effect on workability, which adversely influences the mechanical strength of composites. The fresh state characteristics of a mix mostly depend on the flowability of cement paste, which is affected by a variety of aspects such as water-binder ratio (w/b), type, and quantity of SCM [86]. Conversely, some researchers reported a drop in the workability of mixes with FA addition at higher amounts [87]. The decrease in workability might be the high-water demand due to the smaller size and larger surface area of FA.
Lee et al. [82] highlighted the following aspects as possible explanations for FA’s plasticizing action. To begin, increased paste volume due to FA’s lower density than cement. Second, FA lowers the flocculation of cement particles due to the diluting effect. Thirdly, because of the FA’s slower reaction rate as a result of the lowered development of hydration products at an initial age. In addition, the spherical shape of FA grains facilitates the movement of nearby fragments via the ball bearing effect, particularly at high replacement levels; thus, FA can be a more cost-effective method of increasing flowability than chemical superplasticizers [83]. Bentz et al. [84] also validated the favorable effect of FA on the fluidity of the mix. As previously observed [82], replacing cement with FA reduces yield stress due to the decreased density of FA and hence decreases the number of flocculated cement grain to cement particle contacts. The FA type utilized has also a considerable effect on the fresh properties. According to a study, high calcium FA has a detrimental effect on workability, which in turn has a negative effect on strength and durability [85]. The fresh state performance of a concrete is primarily dependent on the flowability of the cement paste, which is influenced by a variety of elements such as w/b, type, and dose of SCM [88].
Apart from these parameters, prior research has also demonstrated that the packing density of the cement-based composites also has a significant role in determining the cement paste’s flowability, particularly at low w/b ratios [82,89]. Essentially, increased packing density results in decreased water demand, which results in increased water being released (after voids filling) to cover the solid fragments and lubricate the cement paste [90]; however, a higher specific surface area significantly increases the amount of solid surface area that can be covered with water [91,92,93]. These simultaneous actions of tiny fillers can enhance packing density while decreasing the quantity of surplus water per surface area; thus, to achieve a balance between the desired increase in packing density and the unwanted increase in surface area, a filler that is finer than cement but coarser than nano silica/silica fume is required [94]. This indicates that the fineness of the FA impacts the end material’s properties. As a result, it has been concluded that some studies show lower water required for concrete workability due to the refined pores and spherical morphology of FA; others report a higher water requirement due to its increased surface area. This well-documented incompatibility between water demand and FA usage must be rectified.

3.2. Compressive Strength

Numerous tests are used to determine the concrete performance, but CS is often regarded as the most critical. CS tests provide a clear indication of the varied properties of concrete. The literature established that CS is related to a variety of mechanical and durability attributes directly or indirectly [95]. In other words, CS and the quality of concrete are inextricably related. FA’s physical properties, particularly its size and shape, have a substantial effect on the performance of cement-based materials. Additionally, the chemical composition has been considered a base to ascertain the appropriateness of FA for use as SCM [96]. Thus, the hydration process of the FA-cement mix is strongly affected by the intrinsic characteristics of FA, for instance, crystalline structure, chemical and physical properties [97], as well as external factors such as w/b, replacement ratio, and curing temperature. FA fineness is a major factor [98] in controlling the appropriateness of FA in cementitious composites, as the FA grain size has a substantial impact on the performance of composites [99]. The packing and nucleation effects on the cement hydration are highly reliant on the particle size of the FA used [100]. Chindaprasirt et al. [100,101,102] conducted a thorough investigation to examine the effect of the fineness of FA on the composites’ properties; they reported that using finer FA resulted in an increase in CS. It was discovered that coarse FA is less reactive and needs extra water, producing a more porous mortar. The detrimental effects of coarser FA are described as a cause of decreased strength. Numerous findings have indicated that the application of FA impairs the early-age strength development of composites [82,103,104,105]; however, FA generally enhances the strength and durability of composites over time, as it consumes the Ca(OH)2 produced during the hydration of cement and makes secondary hydrates, for example, CSH [106].
The quantity of FA used as cement replacement in composites also affects their properties. The 28-days CS results of specimens at various replacement levels of FA have been provided in Table 2. In addition, the influence of FA replacement ratio, based on past studies, on 28-days CS of composites compared to the reference samples without FA has been shown in Figure 2. Barbuta et al. [107] observed a decrease in CS with the use of FA, and a higher quantity of FA as cement replacement resulted in greater loss of CS. The samples without fibers showed a decrease in CS by 11.3%, 30.4%, 24.8%, 33.7%, and 59.7%, with FA content of 10%, 15%, 20%, 30%, and 40%, respectively, related to the controlled sample. A comparable pattern was also noticed with the samples containing fibers. Gencel et al. [108] assessed the impact of FA on the properties of composites using 10%, 20%, and 30% FA in place of cement. A reduction in CS was observed with the use of FA, compared to the reference mix, also shown in the figure. The reduction in CS was more at higher FA contents. Huang et al. [109] studied the impact of two kinds of FA depending on loss on ignition (LOI) amount, i.e., low LOI (4.6%) and high LOI (7.8%) FA. The outcomes discovered that utilizing low LOI FA at lower proportions enhanced the CS. The maximum increase in CS was examined at 40% content of FA having 16.8% higher CS than that of the reference sample; however, at increased proportions of FA, the CS reduced, which may be ascribed to the finer grain size in low LOI FA, which made the microstructure denser and more compact. The CS reduced with the addition of high LOI FA was because of greater particle size and lower pozzolanic activity; it was also reported that the CS of composites containing higher contents of FA was improved at a later age (1 year) compared to the controlled sample because of the slow pozzolanic reaction.
The effect of FA addition has been investigated in self-compacting concrete (SCC). For example, substituting 35% FA for cement results in a 10% reduction, but substituting 55% FA leads to a 24% reduction compared to the control SCC mix [110]. Similarly, a reduction of approximately 46% and 35% have been seen in containing 50% FA mix, after 7 and 90 days of curing, respectively, when compared to a control SCC mix; moreover, at a 70% FA incorporation level in SCC, a severe reduction of approximately 63% and 47% was seen after 7 and 90 days of curing, respectively [111,112]. The presence of cement additives has a considerable effect on the CS of FA-based SCC. The addition of cement additives improves the performance of FA-based SCC mixtures at both low and high curing temperatures. Silica fume, metakaolin, and limestone filler have all been used previously to increase the CS of SCC mixes. At 90 days, a reduction of nearly 29%, 42%, and 15% was seen for a 50% level of FA with limestone filler (15%), metakaolin (20%), and silica fume (10%) in SCC, respectively [111,113,114].
Table 2. Compressive strength (28-days) of composites containing fly ash.
Table 2. Compressive strength (28-days) of composites containing fly ash.
ReferenceReplacement Ratio (%)Compressive Strength (MPa)
Barbuta et al. [107], without fibers033.4
1029.7
1523.3
2025.2
3022.2
4013.5
Barbuta et al. [107], with 0.25% and 30 mm long fibers033.4
1031.8
1527.4
2025.4
3019.6
4014.4
Barbuta et al. [107], with 0.25% and 50 mm long fibers033.4
1029.8
1524.1
2027.2
3020.9
4011.3
Gencel et al. [108], with 0% FSA052.2
1044.7
2036.8
3029.6
Gencel et al. [108], with 25% FSA050.7
1045.4
2037.8
3031.3
Gencel et al. [108], with 50% FSA053.9
1045.8
2036.6
3029.6
Gencel et al. [108], with 75% FSA055.6
1046.4
2037.3
3030.3
Paliwal and Maru [115]026.4
527.8
1029.4
1528.2
2027.5
Huang et al. [109], 24 MPa concrete and low LOI fly ash025.0
2025.4
4025.6
6023.5
8020.9
Huang et al. [109], 35 MPa concrete and low LOI fly ash034.5
2036.5
4040.3
6034.5
8030.0
Huang et al. [109], 35 MPa concrete and high LOI fly ash034.5
2034.9
4034.1
6030.5
8025.2
FSA: ferrochromium slag aggregate, LOI: loss on ignition.
Figure 2. Influence of fly ash as cement replacement on 28-days compressive strength of composites. FSA: ferrochromium slag aggregate [107,108,109,115].
Figure 2. Influence of fly ash as cement replacement on 28-days compressive strength of composites. FSA: ferrochromium slag aggregate [107,108,109,115].
Materials 15 02664 g002

3.3. Split-Tensile Strength

Another essential mechanical characteristic of concrete is its tensile strength, which has a significant effect on the extent and size of cracking in concrete structures. Because concrete is weak in tension, it is critical to do a pre-evaluation of their split-tensile strength (STS) [116,117]. The use of FA in cementitious composites has a detrimental effect on STS. The 28-days STS results of composites containing FA as SCM are displayed in Table 3. Figure 3 is generated on the data acquired from the literature depicting the variation in 28-days STS due to the replacement of cement by FA. Mostly, a reduction in STS is observed, especially at higher replacement ratios. From the experimental data performed by Barbuta et al. [107], the samples without fibers showed a decrease in STS by 8.1%, 8.1%, 48.3%, 29.6%, and 48.3% with FA content of 10%, 15%, 20%, 30%, and 40%, respectively, as compared to the control sample. The sample containing fibers (0.25% and 50 mm long) and 10% FA showed 12.8% higher STS when compared to the control sample; however, with the further addition of FA, STS was reduced. Gencel et al. [108] studied the combined effect of FA as SCM and ferrochromium slag as an aggregate replacement on STS of composites. They also reported decreasing trend with the addition of FA. The STS of specimens without ferrochromium slag was reduced by 9.7%, 20.7%, and 30.2%, with FA content of 10%, 20%, and 30%, respectively, compared to the sample without FA. A similar pattern of decreasing STS with FA addition was also noted in specimens containing ferrochromium slag as aggregate replacement.
STS was increased at higher curing ages in comparison to lower curing ages, as examined in most previous findings. According to published reports, FA interacts with calcium ions from Ca(OH)2 to CSH, the binder phase. Due to the lack of CSH and Ca(OH)2 in FA-containing concrete, it is unable to build early age strength [118,119]; moreover, the addition of FA reduces the STS of SCC mixtures due to its intrinsic propensity to reduce water [112,120]; however, in FA-based mixes, a considerable increase in STS has been seen with an increase in curing time, despite the presence of minor decrements. Due to the extensive research conducted to date on the effect of curing on FA-based mixes, similar improvements have been noticed in various studies [121].

3.4. Flexural Strength

The review of the past studies revealed that using FA at lower replacement levels can improve the flexural strength (FS) of composites, as shown in Table 4. Figure 4 is generated, indicating the percentage variation in 28-days FS of specimens at various replacement levels of FA. The improvement of 20.33% was observed in the FS when 10% FA was used SCM, while further increase in FA content decreased the FS compared with the reference specimen [107]. The results of Barbuta et al. [107] of specimens with 30 mm long fibers exhibited improvement in FS of 10.4%, 0%, 18.7%, and 8.2% with FA content of 10%, 15%, 20%, and 30%, respectively. While FS reduced by 8.2% at 40% replacement of FA. The specimens containing 50 mm long fibers showed 10.4%, 14.3%, 36.8%, 12.6%, and 7.7% increase in FS when 10%, 15%, 20%, 30%, and 40% cement was replaced by FA, respectively. Hence, it resulted that using a higher amount of FA has a negative influence on FS [107,108], as shown in Figure 4. Paliwal and Maru [115] noted maximum FS at 10% FA content as cement replacement. It can be concluded that the size, type, chemical composition, and content of FA used in cementitious composites have distinct effects on their mechanical properties. The finer particle size improves, while coarser particle size reduces the strength of composites [109]. Additionally, lower content of FA improves while higher FA content reduces the strength of composites [107,108,109]; hence, finer FA and a lower replacement ratio are preferable.

3.5. Durability

3.5.1. Chloride Penetration

The addition of FA also enhances the durability performance of cementitious composites. Saha [122] investigated the durability properties of concrete containing FA at various replacement levels and curing ages of 28 and 90 days. The results of the chloride ion penetration test revealed a decrease in penetration depth with FA addition (see Figure 5). At 28-days of curing, the chloride ion penetration depth reduced by around 18%, 39%, 52%, and 61% at FA content of 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%, respectively. After 180 days, chloride penetration decreased marginally for all samples. The incorporation of 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% FA content resulted in chloride ion penetration reduction of about 7%, 27%, 48%, and 53%, respectively, compared to the control mix. While the volume of the paste remains constant for mixes, the penetration of chloride ions into the matrix is determined by two fundamental factors, including the interlinking pores of the matrix and the free hydroxyl ion in the pore solution. Due to the finer particle size of FA, it may have minimized the interconnecting spaces and decreased the chloride ion penetration. FA can help concrete perform better over time in terms of CS, STS, FS, porosity, chloride penetration, creep, capillary absorption, drying shrinkage, surface scaling, and sulphate attack. Mainly, FA enhanced CS marginally but greatly increased the long-term STS and FS of concretes [123,124,125]. Class F FA in concrete provided more CS and chloride penetration resistance than Class C FA, and the maximum long-term CS was achieved for a FA concrete (67% Class F FA) at the age of seven years, along with exceptional surface scaling resistance [126]. Even when exposed to a sea environment for five years, FA concrete demonstrated strength development. Additionally, utilizing FA in concrete can help prevent chloride permeability and rusting of embedded steel bars [127]. All these long-term advantages can be ascribed to the pozzolanic nature of FA, which improves the amount of CSH, causing cross-linking hydrates at the molecular level and a compact and crack-free microstructure, thereby enhancing durability [125].

3.5.2. Shrinkage

One of the main causes of concrete cracking is the strains caused by shrinkage. While the stresses created by restricted shrinkage have no effect on the structure’s integrity, they do raise the likelihood of durability issues [128,129]. While drying shrinkage occurs as a result of the concrete losing water, autogenous shrinkage occurs as a result of a variation in macroscopic volume when no moisture is transported to the adjacent environment. As a result, composites’ shrinkage must be considered cumulative, taking into account both drying and autogenous deformations. According to reports, volume variation because of shrinkage can frequently be addressed utilizing fillers such as FA [130]. A previous study found that SCM-based composites displayed more drying shrinkage than conventional cement-based composites [131]. Particularly, mixes comprising FA shrink more during the drying process than mixtures, including micro silica and slag cement. The pore structure of a concrete mixture containing SCMs such as FA, micro silica, and slag cement is more refined than that of a concrete mixture comprising only cement. As a result, these mixtures have a greater number of smaller capillary spaces, and thus, the water removal from these pores might result in increased drying shrinkage [94]. Another study also noted that composites with a greater proportion of SCMs have a finer pore structure, which may enhance free shrinkage proportionately [132]. Specifically, the loss caused by autogenous shrinkage can be considerably decreased by the inclusion of FA in composites [133]. Both Class C and Class F FA are thought to be beneficial for minimizing drying shrinkage [134]. The inclusion of FA reduces shrinkage by densifying the mix and preventing internal moisture evaporation [135]. Another reason for the limited shrinkage documented in the literature is the existence of un-hydrated FA grains in the matrix, which act as fine aggregates [136]; however, a few studies have found that FA with a smaller particle size than cement increases autogenous shrinkage [137]. A small-sized FA reduces the space between particles, which reduces the pore size in the paste and, as a result, capillary pressure increases in the paste while consuming water in the hydration process. While some research finds decreased shrinkage as a result of FA addition, a few others report an increase in shrinkage properties as a result of FA incorporation; thus, the influence of varying quantities of distinct FA types on the shrinkage of cement-based materials must be investigated to identify how shrinkage is reduced in FA concrete.

3.5.3. Sulfate Resistance

The effect of FA on the resistance of mortar and concrete to sulphate attack has been widely studied. The significant range in performance of FA cement blends is due to the variety of FA kinds and compositions, as well as changes in mix proportions and construction techniques. In general, low Ca FA is more resistant to sulphate than high Ca FA because it can consume more Ca(OH)2 from the hydrated cement paste, generating more sulfate-resistant CSH without incorporating additional reactive phases present in high Ca FA that can accelerate sulfate-induced deterioration, while high Ca FA can hydrate independently during the generation of additional Ca(OH)2, hence accelerating sulfate-induced deterioration [138]. Apart from changes in calcium concentration, the amount of oxides in FA, including silica, alumina, and iron, as well as their amorphous and crystalline forms, has been demonstrated to have a substantial effect on their sulphate attack efficacy. FA containing less than 5% CaO is anticipated to have no reactive alumina and hence would not react with external sulphates to create expansive ettringite crystals [139]. Most of the studies reported an increase in sulphate resistance of the concrete with FA addition [140,141,142].

3.5.4. Water Absorption

Water absorption (WA) is a feature of cementitious materials that are directly associated with its durability or long-term behavior. The existence of pores, cracks, and fissures in the matrix increases WA, which influences the mechanical and other durability aspects. In general, an increase in WA associated with an increase in FA indicates an increase in the volume of accessible pores [114,143]. Pitroda et al. [144] concluded that when 10% FA is replaced with cement, the WA of concrete decreases. Additionally, they discovered an increasing trend in WA as the level of cement replaced by FA increased by more than 10%. The WA of FA-incorporated concrete, on the other hand, was found to be greater than those of conventional concrete. In contrast, Hatungimana et al. [145] noticed a reduction in the WA of concrete with FA addition, as depicted in Figure 6. They reported that WA values increased as the amount of FA substitution increased, probably because the 28-day curing period was insufficient to complete the pozzolanic reaction; however, at 10% and 20% FA content, the WA of the samples was reduced by 14.6% and 12.2%, respectively, compared to the control mix. Whereas at 30% FA content, the FA concrete sample exhibited a comparable WA capacity to that of the control mix. Finally, the results indicated that FA could be employed as an SCM with some prudent engineering judgments [144].

3.6. Microstructure

Gunasekara et al. [146] performed SEM evaluation to explore the microstructure of composites without FA and composites with FA. The SEM analysis of samples was carried out at the age of 28-days. A dense, compacted, and uniformly distributed matrix was observed for the sample without FA, while cracked, porous, and partially reacted FA grains were observed in the sample containing FA. These observations are consistent with the reduced mechanical properties of FA-based composites, as discussed earlier. Ahad et al. [147] also studied and compared the microstructure of a reference mix without FA and a mix containing 30% FA, as depicted in Figure 7. Crack was observed in the matrix of the reference mix (Figure 7a). This may be due to the high heat of cement hydration resulting in the micro-cracks in the matrix. Though voids in the matrix are less and a denser and compacted matrix can be observed. Micro-cracks are not observed in the matrix of composite containing FA because FA addition reduced the heat of hydration; however, more voids and partially reacted FA particles are observed resulting in less dense matrix (Figure 7b). This also supports the detrimental effects of FA on cementitious composites.
Saha [122] performed a microstructural study of FA concrete, and their micrographs are shown in Figure 8. Figure 8a illustrates the microstructural images of cracked cementitious material containing 40% FA as an SCM at the age of 28 days. Ettringite needles initiate to form in the voids of the binder matrix and on the surface of the FA. Smooth spherical FA grains are also visible, indicating that the FA has been hydrated during its first phase. FA has a somewhat spherical shape, and the existence of spherical grains in the microstructure of the matrix at the age of 28 days suggests that the FA grains have not reacted with the cement during the early hydration phase. Due to exposure to a harsh environment, the spherical form of FA rapidly spoils in cement mix and is substituted with ettringite needles [148,149]. This corroborates the idea that FA retards concrete hydration. Figure 8b illustrates the microstructure of FA concrete after 180 days of curing. The spherical grains were substituted by ettringite as a result of the pozzolanic reaction of FA. The voids between the aggregates are densely packed with ettringite needles. Additionally, the ettringite needles are longer, fill up the gaps in the cement mix; therefore, the ettringite needles fill the spaces between the aggregates by the pozzolanic reaction of FA. As a result, FA concrete produces a denser binder matrix than normal concrete [122].

4. Discussions

The challenges correlated with the manufacture and application of cement are well known. The growing need for concrete, and therefore cement, poses a severe danger to both the environment and human life. In this context, scholars are concentrating on the use of SCMs that can substitute cement in the manufacture of concrete, encouraging eco-friendly development. This study examined the usage of the most common industrial byproducts, i.e., FA, in cementitious composites as SCMs. This study highlighted and discussed the most critical sections, including the properties of FA, the characteristics of composites containing FA as SCMs, i.e., workability, compressive, split-tensile, and flexural strength, durability, and microstructural properties. Table 5 has been prepared to summarize the various parameters examined in this study for FA use as SCM. As can be noticed from the table, FA utilization contributes to construction sustainability. In addition to the sustainable benefits, FA has the further advantage of low heat of hydration. FA is a pozzolanic material and is utilized as SCM in cement-based composites. The use of FA as cement replacement in lower replacement ratios (up to 20%) has a positive effect on the mechanical and durability properties of composites, while at higher replacement ratios, it has a negative effect; moreover, the size of FA alters the properties of composites. The smaller size FA is preferable, as it has a more positive impact on the performance of composites.
FA consumption has increased in the concrete industry because of its benefits, which include reduced hydration heat and increased durability; however, due to the slow pozzolanic action, its contribution to strength begins only at a later age. Attempts have been undertaken to address this well-documented FA deficit using a variety of approaches. Chemical activation is one of these ways and can be accomplished using either alkali or sulphate. In alkali activation, the glass phases of FA are broken down to expedite the reaction at an early stage [150], whereas, in sulphate activation, sulphate combines with the aluminum oxide in the glass phase of FA to form ettringite [151]. In each of these instances, strength is developed at a young age [152]. Alkali activation of FA is a physicochemical method that converts powdered ash to a material with excellent cementitious characteristics [153,154], developing high mechanical strength and exceptional bonding to reinforcing bars [155]. The use of nanoparticles in FA-based cementitious composites to accelerate its early strength gain is becoming more common as a result of its benefits. The nanoparticles serve as nuclei for the cement, accelerating hydration and densifying the microstructure and interfacial transition zone, hence decreasing permeability [156]. Additionally, the combination of FA and nanomaterials enables the hydration product to be tightly bound, which is a critical element in accelerating the pozzolanic process since it compensates for the poor initial strength growth [157,158,159]; hence, the strength of the FA-based cementitious composites can be increased by various methods, including those covered above. For successful strength enhancement via alkali activation or nanoparticle addition, knowledge of the properties of FA is required. Ca/Si and Ca/Al ratios are regarded as critical factors in the formation of CSH gel in the case of nano addition and alumino silicate gel in the case of alkali activation, respectively. Using either of these approaches, it is possible to replace up to 60% of cement with FA without sacrificing strength or durability [94]. For high-volume FA concrete, a ternary blend of cement, FA, and nanomaterials can be advised.

5. Conclusions

The present study aimed to review the different aspects of the fly ash (FA) application as supplementary cementitious material (SCM) in cement-based materials. The influence of the FA characteristics of the mechanical, durability, and microstructural properties of the material is discussed. The various limitations of the FA use in higher proportions, and their potential solutions are described. This study reached the following conclusions:
  • The influence of FA incorporation on the workability of fresh concrete was found to be inconsistent. Some studies reported an increase in the workability because of FA spherical shape, increased volume of the mix due to lower density of FA, and slower development of hydration products due to FA addition; however, some studies found a reduction in the workability of the fresh mix due to the smaller size and larger surface area of FA.
  • Numerous studies have demonstrated that the application of FA inhibits composites’ early-age strength development; however, FA mostly improves the strength of concrete over time by consuming the Ca(OH)2 produced during cement hydration and producing secondary hydrates such as CSH; moreover, the mechanical strength of the composites improves when FA is incorporated in lower concentrations (up to 20%). In addition, finer particle size FA enhances while coarser particle size FA reduces the mechanical strength of composites.
  • The resistance of composites to chloride penetration increases with the addition of FA, especially at later ages. The finer particle size FA decreases the interconnecting voids in the matrix, and pozzolanic action further improves the microstructure, resulting in increased resistance to chloride penetration.
  • There is a contradiction regarding the influence of FA on the shrinkage of cementitious composites. FA incorporation may increase shrinkage due to the creation of a higher amount of small capillary spaces, which facilitates the evaporation of water, causing higher shrinkage. In contrast, due to finer particle size FA addition, the density and compactness of the mix increases, which prevents the internal moisture evaporation, causing reduced shrinkage.
  • The influence of FA on sulphate resistance of composite is determined by the FA type. Generally, low calcium FA (Class C) exhibits more resistance to sulphate resistance than high calcium FA (Class F). This is because low calcium FA consumes more Ca(OH)2 to form CSH, compared to the high calcium FA.
  • The incorporation of FA as SCM up to 20% content is beneficial to composites in terms of reducing water absorption; however, at higher replacement levels, the water absorption capacity increases.
  • The slow early strength development is one of the major drawbacks of FA use in cementitious composites; however, this can be overcome by chemical activation (alkali/sulphate) and/or adding nanomaterials, and this can facilitate high volume usage of FA.
  • Using FA as SCM will promote sustainable development due to reduction in CO2 emissions, preservation of natural resources, effective waste management, reduction in environmental pollution, and low heat of hydration.

6. Future Recommendations

After reviewing the different aspects of the FA application as SCM, this study suggests the following future research directions:
  • Despite the numerous stated procedures for using FA in large quantities, 100% utilization of FA has not been accomplished due to the existence of some grey areas highlighted in this study that must be addressed in the future to increase FA’s usage as SCM. Future studies should be directed on resolving the stated disparities in shrinkage, water demand, and faster curing.
  • While some attributes of structural performance, such as flexural and shear resistance, have been covered previously, additional research is necessary to support the case for FA concrete usage in reinforced concrete structures. These may include the bond strength of steel rebars, the examination of beam-column junctions, and seismic design.
  • Since FA reactivity is based on multiple factors, trying to control one property may deteriorate other properties. For example, while decreasing the w/b in high volume FA concrete increases early/late age strength, the mix results in early-age cracking. Thus, it is critical to consider the combined effect of multiple parameters in order to maximize the benefits of FA and cement in an optimum planned mix.
  • Presently, there is a growing tendency toward the production of geopolymers that include 100% FA [160]; however, to promote the applicability of geopolymer concrete, certain shortcomings such as curing regime, availability of activators, efflorescence, and alkali-silica reaction [39] must be addressed. In this respect, it is reported that designed FA concrete, which can replace up to 60% of cement, is a superior alternative in terms of strength and durability.
  • Based on the comprehensive examination of FA as SCM, it is proposed that further fly ash classifications be added to the existing ASTM classifications.

Author Contributions

G.L.: conceptualization, resources, methodology, investigation, validation, project administration, writing-original draft; C.Z.: data curation, formal analysis, supervision, investigation, visualization, writing, reviewing, and editing; W.A.: conceptualization, data curation, methodology, software, supervision, writing—original draft; K.I.U.: funding acquisition, validation, formal analysis, writing, reviewing, and editing; M.K.: resources, visualization, writing, reviewing, and editing; A.M.M.: data curation, formal analysis, writing, reviewing, and editing; R.K.: methodology, investigation, writing, reviewing, and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research is partially funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation under the strategic academic leadership program ‘Priority 2030’ (Agreement 075-15-2021-1333 dated 30.09.2021).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kishore, K.; Gupta, N. Application of domestic & industrial waste materials in concrete: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 26, 2926–2931. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tang, P.; Brouwers, H.J.H. The durability and environmental properties of self-compacting concrete incorporating cold bonded lightweight aggregates produced from combined industrial solid wastes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 167, 271–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ren, C.; Wang, W.; Li, G. Preparation of high-performance cementitious materials from industrial solid waste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 152, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Brooks, S.J.; Escudero-Oñate, C.; Lillicrap, A.D. An ecotoxicological assessment of mine tailings from three Norwegian mines. Chemosphere 2019, 233, 818–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Park, I.; Tabelin, C.B.; Jeon, S.; Li, X.; Seno, K.; Ito, M.; Hiroyoshi, N. A review of recent strategies for acid mine drainage prevention and mine tailings recycling. Chemosphere 2019, 219, 588–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ahmaruzzaman, M. Industrial wastes as low-cost potential adsorbents for the treatment of wastewater laden with heavy metals. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 166, 36–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Friedlander, L.R.; Weisbrod, N.; Garb, Y.J. Climatic and soil-mineralogical controls on the mobility of trace metal contamination released by informal electronic waste (e-waste) processing. Chemosphere 2019, 232, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Walls, M.; Palmer, K. Upstream pollution, downstream waste disposal, and the design of comprehensive environmental policies. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2001, 41, 94–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Awomeso, J.A.; Taiwo, A.M.; Gbadebo, A.M.; Arimoro, A.O. Waste disposal and pollution management in urban areas: A workable remedy for the environment in developing countries. Am. J. Environ. Sci. 2010, 6, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wilberforce, T.; Baroutaji, A.; Soudan, B.; Al-Alami, A.H.; Olabi, A.G. Outlook of carbon capture technology and challenges. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 657, 56–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Mastali, M.; Abdollahnejad, Z.; Pacheco-Torgal, F. Carbon dioxide sequestration on fly ash/waste glassalkali-based mortars with recycled aggregates: Compressive strength, hydration products, carbon footprint, and cost analysis. In Carbon Dioxide Sequestration in Cementitious Construction Materials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 299–348. [Google Scholar]
  12. Koneswaran, G.; Nierenberg, D. Global farm animal production and global warming: Impacting and mitigating climate change. Environ. Health Perspect. 2008, 116, 578–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Drissi, S.; Ling, T.-C.; Mo, K.H.; Eddhahak, A. A review of microencapsulated and composite phase change materials: Alteration of strength and thermal properties of cement-based materials. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 110, 467–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Khan, M.; Ali, M. Improvement in concrete behavior with fly ash, silica-fume and coconut fibres. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 203, 174–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khan, M.; Rehman, A.; Ali, M. Efficiency of silica-fume content in plain and natural fiber reinforced concrete for concrete road. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 244, 118382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Meng, Y.; Ling, T.-C.; Mo, K.H.; Tian, W. Enhancement of high temperature performance of cement blocks via CO2 curing. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 671, 827–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kumar, V.P.; Prasad, D.R. Influence of supplementary cementitious materials on strength and durability characteristics of concrete. Adv. Concr. Constr. 2019, 7, 75. [Google Scholar]
  18. Alyousef, R.; Ahmad, W.; Ahmad, A.; Aslam, F.; Joyklad, P.; Alabduljabbar, H. Potential use of recycled plastic and rubber aggregate in cementitious materials for sustainable construction: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 329, 129736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cao, M.; Mao, Y.; Khan, M.; Si, W.; Shen, S. Different testing methods for assessing the synthetic fiber distribution in cement-based composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 184, 128–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xie, C.; Cao, M.; Khan, M.; Yin, H.; Guan, J. Review on different testing methods and factors affecting fracture properties of fiber reinforced cementitious composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 273, 121766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Khan, M.; Cao, M.; Xie, C.; Ali, M. Efficiency of basalt fiber length and content on mechanical and microstructural properties of hybrid fiber concrete. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 2021, 44, 2135–2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, L.; Khan, M.; Bai, C.; Shi, K. Uniaxial Tensile Behavior, Flexural Properties, Empirical Calculation and Microstructure of Multi-Scale Fiber Reinforced Cement-Based Material at Elevated Temperature. Materials 2021, 14, 1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Schneider, M.; Romer, M.; Tschudin, M.; Bolio, H. Sustainable cement production—Present and future. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 642–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ali, K.; Qureshi, M.I.; Saleem, S.; Khan, S.U. Effect of waste electronic plastic and silica fume on mechanical properties and thermal performance of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 285, 122952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Adil, G.; Kevern, J.T.; Mann, D. Influence of silica fume on mechanical and durability of pervious concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 247, 118453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ahmad, W.; Ahmad, A.; Ostrowski, K.A.; Aslam, F.; Joyklad, P.; Zajdel, P. Application of Advanced Machine Learning Approaches to Predict the Compressive Strength of Concrete Containing Supplementary Cementitious Materials. Materials 2021, 14, 5762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Federico, L. Waste Glass—A Supplementary Cementitious Material. Ph.D. Thesis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  28. Shanmugasundaram, N.; Praveenkumar, S. Influence of supplementary cementitious materials, curing conditions and mixing ratios on fresh and mechanical properties of engineered cementitious composites—A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 309, 125038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gupta, S.; Chaudhary, S. State of the art review on Supplementary Cementitious Materials in India—I: An overview of legal perspective, governing organizations, and development patterns. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 261, 121203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ahmad, W.; Ahmad, A.; Ostrowski, K.A.; Aslam, F.; Joyklad, P.; Zajdel, P. Sustainable approach of using sugarcane bagasse ash in cement-based composites: A systematic review. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2021, 15, e00698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Provis, J.L.; Palomo, A.; Shi, C. Advances in understanding alkali-activated materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 2015, 78, 110–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Usanova, K.; Barabanshchikov, Y.G. Cold-Bonded fly ash aggregate concrete. Mag. Civ. Eng. 2020, 3, 95. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kutchko, B.G.; Kim, A.G. Fly ash characterization by SEM–EDS. Fuel 2006, 85, 2537–2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sua-iam, G.; Makul, N. Rheological and mechanical properties of cement–fly ash self-consolidating concrete incorporating high volumes of alumina-based material as fine aggregate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 95, 736–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Amran, M.; Fediuk, R.; Murali, G.; Avudaiappan, S.; Ozbakkaloglu, T.; Vatin, N.; Karelina, M.; Klyuev, S.; Gholampour, A. Fly ash-based eco-efficient concretes: A comprehensive review of the short-term properties. Materials 2021, 14, 4264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Şahmaran, M.; Li, V.C. Durability properties of micro-cracked ECC containing high volumes fly ash. Cem. Concr. Res. 2009, 39, 1033–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Uthaman, S.; Vishwakarma, V.; George, R.P.; Ramachandran, D.; Kumari, K.; Preetha, R.; Premila, M.; Rajaraman, R.; Mudali, U.K.; Amarendra, G. Enhancement of strength and durability of fly ash concrete in seawater environments: Synergistic effect of nanoparticles. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 187, 448–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Azimi, E.A.; Abdullah, M.M.A.B.; Vizureanu, P.; Salleh, M.A.A.M.; Sandu, A.V.; Chaiprapa, J.; Yoriya, S.; Hussin, K.; Aziz, I.H. Strength development and elemental distribution of dolomite/fly ash geopolymer composite under elevated temperature. Materials 2020, 13, 1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Yang, H.; Liu, L.; Yang, W.; Liu, H.; Ahmad, W.; Ahmad, A.; Aslam, F.; Joyklad, P. A comprehensive overview of geopolymer composites: A bibliometric analysis and literature review. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 16, e00830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, X.; Qin, D.; Hu, Y.; Ahmad, W.; Ahmad, A.; Aslam, F.; Joyklad, P. A systematic review of waste materials in cement-based composites for construction applications. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 45, 103447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. John, E.; Matschei, T.; Stephan, D. Nucleation seeding with calcium silicate hydrate—A review. Cem. Concr. Res. 2018, 113, 74–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. González, A.; Navia, R.; Moreno, N. Fly ashes from coal and petroleum coke combustion: Current and innovative potential applications. Waste Manag. Res. 2009, 27, 976–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Saha, A.K.; Sarker, P.K. Sustainable use of ferronickel slag fine aggregate and fly ash in structural concrete: Mechanical properties and leaching study. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 162, 438–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yao, Z.T.; Ji, X.S.; Sarker, P.K.; Tang, J.H.; Ge, L.Q.; Xia, M.S.; Xi, Y.Q. A comprehensive review on the applications of coal fly ash. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2015, 141, 105–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Berndt, M.L. Properties of sustainable concrete containing fly ash, slag and recycled concrete aggregate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009, 23, 2606–2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, G.; Zhao, X. Properties of concrete incorporating fly ash and ground granulated blast-furnace slag. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2003, 25, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chindaprasirt, P.; Jaturapitakkul, C.; Sinsiri, T. Effect of fly ash fineness on compressive strength and pore size of blended cement paste. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2005, 27, 425–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lee, H.K.; Lee, K.M.; Kim, B.G. Autogenous shrinkage of high-performance concrete containing fly ash. Mag. Concr. Res. 2003, 55, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Atiş, C.D. High-Volume fly ash concrete with high strength and low drying shrinkage. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2003, 15, 153–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Baite, E.; Messan, A.; Hannawi, K.; Tsobnang, F.; Prince, W. Physical and transfer properties of mortar containing coal bottom ash aggregates from Tefereyre (Niger). Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 125, 919–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Siddique, R. Utilization of industrial byproducts in concrete. Procedia Eng. 2014, 95, 335–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Kim, H.-K. Utilization of sieved and ground coal bottom ash powders as a coarse binder in high-strength mortar to improve workability. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 91, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Thomas, M. Supplementary Cementing Materials in Concrete; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  54. Ma, J.; Wang, D.; Zhao, S.; Duan, P.; Yang, S. Influence of particle morphology of ground fly ash on the fluidity and strength of cement paste. Materials 2021, 14, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bicer, A. Effect of fly ash particle size on thermal and mechanical properties of fly ash-cement composites. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2018, 8, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Panda, L.; Dash, S. Characterization and utilization of coal fly ash: A review. Emerg. Mater. Res. 2020, 9, 921–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Song, M.; Kaewmee, P.; Takahashi, F. Mechanism analysis of modification of coal fly ash on high strength biodegradable porous composites synthesis. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management, Nagoya, Japan, 12–15 September 2018; p. 591. [Google Scholar]
  58. Ahmaruzzaman, M. A review on the utilization of fly ash. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2010, 36, 327–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dananjayan, R.R.T.; Kandasamy, P.; Andimuthu, R. Direct mineral carbonation of coal fly ash for CO2 sequestration. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 4173–4182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ukwattage, N.L.; Ranjith, P.; Yellishetty, M.; Bui, H.H.; Xu, T. A laboratory-scale study of the aqueous mineral carbonation of coal fly ash for CO2 sequestration. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 103, 665–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Xie, J.; Wang, J.; Rao, R.; Wang, C.; Fang, C. Effects of combined usage of GGBS and fly ash on workability and mechanical properties of alkali activated geopolymer concrete with recycled aggregate. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 164, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhao, Z.; Wang, K.; Lange, D.A.; Zhou, H.; Wang, W.; Zhu, D. Creep and thermal cracking of ultra-high volume fly ash mass concrete at early age. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2019, 99, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hefni, Y.; Abd El Zaher, Y.; Wahab, M.A. Influence of activation of fly ash on the mechanical properties of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 172, 728–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Vargas, J.; Halog, A. Effective carbon emission reductions from using upgraded fly ash in the cement industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 103, 948–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM C 618-Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  66. Siddique, R. Performance characteristics of high-volume Class F fly ash concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 2004, 34, 487–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Committee, R.-S. Siliceous byproducts for use in concrete. Mater. Struct 1988, 21, 69–80. [Google Scholar]
  68. Atiş, C.D.; Görür, E.B.; Karahan, O.; Bilim, C.; İlkentapar, S.; Luga, E. Very high strength (120 MPa) class F fly ash geopolymer mortar activated at different NaOH amount, heat curing temperature and heat curing duration. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 96, 673–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Shehata, M.H.; Thomas, M.D. The effect of fly ash composition on the expansion of concrete due to alkali–silica reaction. Cem. Concr. Res. 2000, 30, 1063–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Belviso, C.; Giannossa, L.C.; Huertas, F.J.; Lettino, A.; Mangone, A.; Fiore, S. Synthesis of zeolites at low temperatures in fly ash-kaolinite mixtures. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2015, 212, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sun, J.; Zhang, Z.; Hou, G. Utilization of fly ash microsphere powder as a mineral admixture of cement: Effects on early hydration and microstructure at different curing temperatures. Powder Technol. 2020, 375, 262–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Smith, I.A. The design of fly-ash concretes. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 1967, 36, 769–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bui, P.T.; Ogawa, Y.; Kawai, K. Long-Term pozzolanic reaction of fly ash in hardened cement-based paste internally activated by natural injection of saturated Ca(OH)2 solution. Mater. Struct. 2018, 51, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Yu, Z.; Ni, C.; Tang, M.; Shen, X. Relationship between water permeability and pore structure of Portland cement paste blended with fly ash. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 175, 458–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Nedunuri, S.S.S.A.; Sertse, S.G.; Muhammad, S. Microstructural study of Portland cement partially replaced with fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag and silica fume as determined by pozzolanic activity. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 238, 117561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Babu, K.G.; Rao, G.S.N. Efficiency of fly ash in concrete with age. Cem. Concr. Res. 1996, 26, 465–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gopalan, M.K.; Hague, M.N. Design of flyash concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 1985, 15, 694–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bijen, J.; Van Selst, R. Cement equivalence factors for fly ash. Cem. Concr. Res. 1993, 23, 1029–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cao, C.; Sun, W.; Qin, H. The analysis on strength and fly ash effect of roller-compacted concrete with high volume fly ash. Cem. Concr. Res. 2000, 30, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zeng, Q.; Li, K.; Fen-chong, T.; Dangla, P. Determination of cement hydration and pozzolanic reaction extents for fly-ash cement pastes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 27, 560–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kim, J.H.; Noemi, N.; Shah, S.P. Effect of powder materials on the rheology and formwork pressure of self-consolidating concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2012, 34, 746–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lee, C.Y.; Lee, H.K.; Lee, K.M. Strength and microstructural characteristics of chemically activated fly ash–cement systems. Cem. Concr. Res. 2003, 33, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kashani, A.; San Nicolas, R.; Qiao, G.G.; van Deventer, J.S.; Provis, J.L. Modelling the yield stress of ternary cement–slag–fly ash pastes based on particle size distribution. Powder Technol. 2014, 266, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bentz, D.P.; Ferraris, C.F.; Galler, M.A.; Hansen, A.S.; Guynn, J.M. Influence of particle size distributions on yield stress and viscosity of cement–fly ash pastes. Cem. Concr. Res. 2012, 42, 404–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ponikiewski, T.; Gołaszewski, J. The influence of high-calcium fly ash on the properties of fresh and hardened self-compacting concrete and high performance self-compacting concrete. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 72, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. ACI Committee 234. ACI PRC-234-06: Guide for the Use of Silica Fume in Concrete; ACI: Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  87. Chandra Sekar, G.; Ch, H.K.; Manikanta, V.; Simhachalam, M. Effect of fly ash on mechanical properties of light weight vermiculite concrete. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2016, 5, 4106–4112. [Google Scholar]
  88. Aldred, J.M.; Holland, T.C.; Morgan, D.R.; Roy, D.M.; Bury, M.A.; Hooton, R.D.; Olek, J.; Scali, M.J.; Detwiler, R.J.; Jaber, T.M. Guide for the Use of Silica Fume in Concrete; ACI–American Concrete Institute–Committee: Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2006; Volume 234. [Google Scholar]
  89. Kwan, A.K.H.; Wong, H.H.C. Packing density of cementitious materials: Part 2—Packing and flow of OPC + PFA + CSF. Mater. Struct. 2008, 41, 773–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Nanthagopalan, P.; Haist, M.; Santhanam, M.; Müller, H.S. Investigation on the influence of granular packing on the flow properties of cementitious suspensions. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2008, 30, 763–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Fung, W.W.S.; Kwan, A.K.H. Role of water film thickness in rheology of CSF mortar. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2010, 32, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Nochaiya, T.; Wongkeo, W.; Chaipanich, A. Utilization of fly ash with silica fume and properties of Portland cement–fly ash–silica fume concrete. Fuel 2010, 89, 768–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wong, H.H.C.; Kwan, A.K.H. Rheology of cement paste: Role of excess water to solid surface area ratio. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2008, 20, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Hemalatha, T.; Ramaswamy, A. A review on fly ash characteristics—Towards promoting high volume utilization in developing sustainable concrete. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 147, 546–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Singh, N.; Kumar, P.; Goyal, P. Reviewing the behaviour of high volume fly ash based self compacting concrete. J. Build. Eng. 2019, 26, 100882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Blissett, R.; Rowson, N. A review of the multi-component utilisation of coal fly ash. Fuel 2012, 97, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Durdziński, P.T.; Dunant, C.F.; Haha, M.B.; Scrivener, K.L. A new quantification method based on SEM-EDS to assess fly ash composition and study the reaction of its individual components in hydrating cement paste. Cem. Concr. Res. 2015, 73, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Slanička, Š. The influence of fly ash fineness on the strength of concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 1991, 21, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Erdoğdu, K.; Türker, P. Effects of fly ash particle size on strength of Portland cement fly ash mortars. Cem. Concr. Res. 1998, 28, 1217–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Chindaprasirt, P.; Jaturapitakkul, C.; Sinsiri, T. Effect of fly ash fineness on microstructure of blended cement paste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2007, 21, 1534–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Chindaprasirt, P.; Chotithanorm, C.; Cao, H.; Sirivivatnanon, V. Influence of fly ash fineness on the chloride penetration of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2007, 21, 356–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Chindaprasirt, P.; Homwuttiwong, S.; Sirivivatnanon, V. Influence of fly ash fineness on strength, drying shrinkage and sulfate resistance of blended cement mortar. Cem. Concr. Res. 2004, 34, 1087–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Harwalkar, A.B.; Awanti, S. Laboratory and field investigations on high-volume fly ash concrete for rigid pavement. Transp. Res. Rec. 2014, 2441, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Khan, U.A.; Jahanzaib, H.M.; Khan, M.; Ali, M. Improving the Tensile Energy Absorption of High Strength Natural Fiber Reinforced Concrete with Fly-Ash for Bridge Girders. Key Eng. Mater. 2018, 765, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Yao, Y.; Gong, J.K.; Cui, Z. Anti-corrosion performance and microstructure analysis on a marine concrete utilizing coal combustion byproducts and blast furnace slag. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2014, 16, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Kocak, Y.; Nas, S. The effect of using fly ash on the strength and hydration characteristics of blended cements. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 73, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Barbuta, M.; Bucur, R.; Serbanoiu, A.A.; Scutarasu, S.; Burlacu, A. Combined effect of fly ash and fibers on properties of cement concrete. Procedia Eng. 2017, 181, 280–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Gencel, O.; Koksal, F.; Ozel, C.; Brostow, W. Combined effects of fly ash and waste ferrochromium on properties of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 29, 633–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Huang, C.-H.; Lin, S.-K.; Chang, C.-S.; Chen, H.-J. Mix proportions and mechanical properties of concrete containing very high-volume of Class F fly ash. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 46, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Şahmaran, M.; Keskin, S.B.; Ozerkan, G.; Yaman, I.O. Self-Healing of mechanically-loaded self consolidating concretes with high volumes of fly ash. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2008, 30, 872–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Celik, K.; Meral, C.; Mancio, M.; Mehta, P.K.; Monteiro, P.J.M. A comparative study of self-consolidating concretes incorporating high-volume natural pozzolan or high-volume fly ash. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 67, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Şahmaran, M.; Yaman, İ.Ö.; Tokyay, M. Transport and mechanical properties of self consolidating concrete with high volume fly ash. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2009, 31, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Anjos, M.A.S.; Camões, A.; Jesus, C. Eco-Efficient self-compacting concrete with reduced Portland cement content and high volume of fly ash and metakaolin. Key Eng. Mater. 2015, 634, 172–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Wongkeo, W.; Thongsanitgarn, P.; Ngamjarurojana, A.; Chaipanich, A. Compressive strength and chloride resistance of self-compacting concrete containing high level fly ash and silica fume. Mater. Des. 2014, 64, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Paliwal, G.; Maru, S. Effect of fly ash and plastic waste on mechanical and durability properties of concrete. Adv. Concr. Constr. 2017, 5, 575–586. [Google Scholar]
  116. Ibrahim, M.H.W.; Hamzah, A.F.; Jamaluddin, N.; Ramadhansyah, P.J.; Fadzil, A.M. Split tensile strength on self-compacting concrete containing coal bottom ash. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 195, 2280–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Yoshitake, I.; Komure, H.; Nassif, A.Y.; Fukumoto, S. Tensile properties of high volume fly-ash (HVFA) concrete with limestone aggregate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 49, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Singh, N.; Singh, S.P. Carbonation and electrical resistance of self compacting concrete made with recycled concrete aggregates and metakaolin. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 121, 400–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Singh, N.; Singh, S.P. Carbonation resistance and microstructural analysis of low and high volume fly ash self compacting concrete containing recycled concrete aggregates. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 127, 828–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Liu, M. Self-Compacting concrete with different levels of pulverized fuel ash. Constr. Build. Mater. 2010, 24, 1245–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Kapoor, K.; Singh, S.P.; Singh, B. Durability of self-compacting concrete made with Recycled Concrete Aggregates and mineral admixtures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 128, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Saha, A.K. Effect of class F fly ash on the durability properties of concrete. Sustain. Environ. Res. 2018, 28, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Gonen, T.; Yazicioglu, S. The influence of mineral admixtures on the short and long-term performance of concrete. Build. Environ. 2007, 42, 3080–3085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Li, G. Properties of high-volume fly ash concrete incorporating nano-SiO2. Cem. Concr. Res. 2004, 34, 1043–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Thomas, M.D.A. Optimizing the Use of Fly Ash in Concrete; Portland Cement Association: Skokie, IL, USA, 2007; Volume 5420. [Google Scholar]
  126. Naik, T.R.; Ramme, B.W.; Kraus, R.N.; Siddique, R. Long-Term Performance of High-Volume Fly Ash. ACI Mater. J. 2003, 100, 150–155. [Google Scholar]
  127. Kwon, S.-J.; Lee, H.-S.; Karthick, S.; Saraswathy, V.; Yang, H.-M. Long-Term corrosion performance of blended cement concrete in the marine environment—A real-time study. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 154, 349–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Al-Saleh, S.A.; Al-Zaid, R.Z. Effects of drying conditions, admixtures and specimen size on shrinkage strains. Cem. Concr. Res. 2006, 36, 1985–1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Holt, E.; Leivo, M. Cracking risks associated with early age shrinkage. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2004, 26, 521–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Rao, G.A. Long-Term drying shrinkage of mortar—Influence of silica fume and size of fine aggregate. Cem. Concr. Res. 2001, 31, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Mokarem, D.W.; Weyers, R.E.; Lane, D.S. Development of a shrinkage performance specifications and prediction model analysis for supplemental cementitious material concrete mixtures. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35, 918–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Güneyisi, E.; Gesoğlu, M.; Özbay, E. Strength and drying shrinkage properties of self-compacting concretes incorporating multi-system blended mineral admixtures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2010, 24, 1878–1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Akkaya, Y.; Ouyang, C.; Shah, S.P. Effect of supplementary cementitious materials on shrinkage and crack development in concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2007, 29, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Zhao, H.; Sun, W.; Wu, X.; Gao, B. The properties of the self-compacting concrete with fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag mineral admixtures. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 95, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Şahmaran, M.; Yaman, Ö.; Tokyay, M. Development of high-volume low-lime and high-lime fly-ash-incorporated self-consolidating concrete. Mag. Concr. Res. 2007, 59, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Zhang, M.H. Microstructure, crack propagation, and mechanical properties of cement pastes containing high volumes of fly ashes. Cem. Concr. Res. 1995, 25, 1165–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Wang, K.; Shah, S.P.; Phuaksuk, P. Plastic shrinkage cracking in concrete materials—Influence of fly ash and fibers. Mater. J. 2001, 98, 458–464. [Google Scholar]
  138. Mardani-Aghabaglou, A.; Sezer, G.İ.; Ramyar, K. Comparison of fly ash, silica fume and metakaolin from mechanical properties and durability performance of mortar mixtures view point. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 70, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Baghabra, O.S.; Maslehuddin, M.; Saadi, M.M. Effect of magnesium sulfate and sodium sulfate on the durability performance of plain and blended cements. Mater. J. 1995, 92, 15–24. [Google Scholar]
  140. Sumer, M. Compressive strength and sulfate resistance properties of concretes containing Class F and Class C fly ashes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 34, 531–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Ramyar, K.; Inan, G. Sodium sulfate attack on plain and blended cements. Build. Environ. 2007, 42, 1368–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Mirvalad, S.; Nokken, M. Minimum SCM requirements in mixtures containing limestone cement to control thaumasite sulfate attack. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 84, 19–29. [Google Scholar]
  143. Khodair, Y.; Bommareddy, B. Self-Consolidating concrete using recycled concrete aggregate and high volume of fly ash, and slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 153, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Pitroda, J.; Umrigar, D.F.S.; Principal, B.; Anand, G.I. Evaluation of sorptivity and water absorption of concrete with partial replacement of cement by thermal industry waste (Fly Ash). Int. J. Eng. Innov. Technol. (IJEIT) 2013, 2, 245–249. [Google Scholar]
  145. Hatungimana, D.; Taşköprü, C.; İçhedef, M.; Saç, M.M.; Yazıcı, Ş. Compressive strength, water absorption, water sorptivity and surface radon exhalation rate of silica fume and fly ash based mortar. J. Build. Eng. 2019, 23, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Gunasekara, C.; Zhou, Z.; Law, D.W.; Sofi, M.; Setunge, S.; Mendis, P. Microstructure and strength development of quaternary blend high-volume fly ash concrete. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 6441–6456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Ahad, M.Z.; Ashraf, M.; Kumar, R.; Ullah, M. Thermal, Physico-Chemical, and Mechanical Behaviour of Mass Concrete with Hybrid Blends of Bentonite and Fly Ash. Materials 2019, 12, 60. [Google Scholar]
  148. Saha, A.K.; Sarker, P.K. Expansion due to alkali-silica reaction of ferronickel slag fine aggregate in OPC and blended cement mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 123, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Ibrahim, R.K.; Hamid, R.; Taha, M.R. Fire resistance of high-volume fly ash mortars with nanosilica addition. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 36, 779–786. [Google Scholar]
  150. Poon, C.S.; Kou, S.C.; Lam, L.; Lin, Z.S. Activation of fly ash/cement systems using calcium sulfate anhydrite (CaSO4). Cem. Concr. Res. 2001, 31, 873–881. [Google Scholar]
  151. Min, Y.; Jueshi, Q.; Ying, P. Activation of fly ash–lime systems using calcined phosphogypsum. Constr. Build. Mater. 2008, 22, 1004–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Aimin, X.; Sarkar, S.L. Microstructural study of gypsum activated fly ash hydration in cement paste. Cem. Concr. Res. 1991, 21, 1137–1147. [Google Scholar]
  153. Fernández-Jiménez, A.; Palomo, A. Characterisation of fly ashes. Potential reactivity as alkaline cements. Fuel 2003, 82, 2259–2265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Palomo, A.; Alonso, S.; Fernandez-Jiménez, A.; Sobrados, I.; Sanz, J. Alkaline activation of fly ashes: NMR study of the reaction products. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2004, 87, 1141–1145. [Google Scholar]
  155. Fernandez-Jimenez, A.M.; Palomo, A.; Lopez-Hombrados, C. Engineering properties of alkali-activated fly ash concrete. ACI Mater. J. 2006, 103, 106. [Google Scholar]
  156. Sanchez, F.; Sobolev, K. Nanotechnology in concrete—A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2010, 24, 2060–2071. [Google Scholar]
  157. Shaikh, F.U.A.; Supit, S.W.M.; Sarker, P.K. A study on the effect of nano silica on compressive strength of high volume fly ash mortars and concretes. Mater. Des. 2014, 60, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Supit, S.W.M.; Shaikh, F.U.A.; Sarker, P.K. Effect of nano silica and ultrafine fly ash on compressive strength of high volume fly ash mortar. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2013, 368–370, 1061–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Supit, S.W.M.; Shaikh, F.U.A. Durability properties of high volume fly ash concrete containing nano-silica. Mater. Struct. 2015, 48, 2431–2445. [Google Scholar]
  160. Meesala, C.R.; Verma, N.K.; Kumar, S. Critical review on fly-ash based geopolymer concrete. Struct. Concr. 2020, 21, 1013–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Micrograph of fly ash: (a) [70]; (b) [71].
Figure 1. Micrograph of fly ash: (a) [70]; (b) [71].
Materials 15 02664 g001
Figure 3. Influence of fly ash as cement replacement on 28-days split-tensile strength of composites. FSA: ferrochromium slag aggregate [107,108].
Figure 3. Influence of fly ash as cement replacement on 28-days split-tensile strength of composites. FSA: ferrochromium slag aggregate [107,108].
Materials 15 02664 g003
Figure 4. Influence of fly ash as cement replacement on 28-days flexural strength of composites [107,109,115].
Figure 4. Influence of fly ash as cement replacement on 28-days flexural strength of composites [107,109,115].
Materials 15 02664 g004
Figure 5. Chloride penetration of fly ash based-concrete at 28 and 180 days of curing [122].
Figure 5. Chloride penetration of fly ash based-concrete at 28 and 180 days of curing [122].
Materials 15 02664 g005
Figure 6. Water absorption of concrete at various contents of fly ash [145].
Figure 6. Water absorption of concrete at various contents of fly ash [145].
Materials 15 02664 g006
Figure 7. Microstructure of samples: (a) Without fly ash; (b) With 30% fly ash [147].
Figure 7. Microstructure of samples: (a) Without fly ash; (b) With 30% fly ash [147].
Materials 15 02664 g007
Figure 8. SEM micrographs of composites containing 40% fly ash as a biner at: (a) 28-days; (b) 180-days [122].
Figure 8. SEM micrographs of composites containing 40% fly ash as a biner at: (a) 28-days; (b) 180-days [122].
Materials 15 02664 g008
Table 1. Element oxides range in fly ash types.
Table 1. Element oxides range in fly ash types.
Element OxidesRange of Element Oxides (%)
Class FClass C
SiO237.0–62.111.8–46.4
Al2O316.6–35.62.6–20.5
Fe2O32.6–21.21.4–15.6
CaO0.5–14.015.1–54.8
MgO0.3–5.20.1–6.7
SO30.02–4.71.4–12.9
Na2O0.1–3.60.2–2.8
K2O0.1–4.10.3–9.3
TiO20.5–2.60.6–1.0
P2O50.1–1.70.2–0.4
MnO0.03–0.10.3–0.2
LOI0.3–32.80.3–11.7
Table 3. Split-tensile strength (28-days) of composites containing fly ash.
Table 3. Split-tensile strength (28-days) of composites containing fly ash.
Fly Ash
ReferenceReplacement Ratio (%)Split-Tensile Strength (MPa)
Barbuta et al. [107], without fibers01.72
101.58
151.58
200.89
301.21
400.89
Barbuta et al. [107], with 0.25% and 30 mm long fibers01.72
101.51
151.37
201.05
301.71
401.02
Barbuta et al. [107], with 0.25% and 50 mm long fibers01.72
101.94
151.45
200.87
301.82
400.85
Gencel et al. [108], with 0% FSA05.20
104.70
204.12
303.63
Gencel et al. [108], with 25% FSA05.31
104.74
204.17
303.66
Gencel et al. [108], with 50% FSA05.24
104.78
204.19
303.78
Gencel et al. [108], with 75% FSA05.30
104.83
204.22
303.70
FSA: ferrochromium slag aggregate.
Table 4. Flexural strength (28-days) of composites containing fly ash.
Table 4. Flexural strength (28-days) of composites containing fly ash.
Fly Ash
ReferenceReplacement Ratio (%)Flexural Strength (MPa)
Barbuta et al. [107], without fibers01.82
102.19
151.62
201.53
301.62
401.04
Barbuta et al. [107], with 0.25% and 30 mm long fibers01.82
102.01
151.82
202.16
301.97
401.67
Barbuta et al. [107], with 0.25% and 50 mm long fibers01.82
102.01
152.08
202.49
302.05
401.96
Paliwal and Maru [115]03.48
53.88
104.44
154.14
203.62
Huang et al. [109], 35 MPa concrete and low LOI fly ash05.1
205.3
405.2
605
803.7
Huang et al. [109], 35 MPa concrete and high LOI fly ash05.1
205
405.1
604.5
803.2
LOI: loss on ignition.
Table 5. Comparison of various aspects of utilizing silica fume and fly ash in cementitious materials.
Table 5. Comparison of various aspects of utilizing silica fume and fly ash in cementitious materials.
AspectDetail
SustainabilityReduction in CO2 emission
Effective waste management
Decreases environmental pollution
Preserve natural resources
Cost-effective
Low heat of hydration
Influence on material propertiesInconsistent influence on workability
Enhances the performance of composites when used in lower replacement ratios (up to 20%)
Negative influence on material’s performance at higher proportions
LimitationsUtilization at higher replacement levels is not preferable
Low early strength development
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, G.; Zhou, C.; Ahmad, W.; Usanova, K.I.; Karelina, M.; Mohamed, A.M.; Khallaf, R. Fly Ash Application as Supplementary Cementitious Material: A Review. Materials 2022, 15, 2664. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15072664

AMA Style

Li G, Zhou C, Ahmad W, Usanova KI, Karelina M, Mohamed AM, Khallaf R. Fly Ash Application as Supplementary Cementitious Material: A Review. Materials. 2022; 15(7):2664. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15072664

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Guanlei, Chengke Zhou, Waqas Ahmad, Kseniia Iurevna Usanova, Maria Karelina, Abdeliazim Mustafa Mohamed, and Rana Khallaf. 2022. "Fly Ash Application as Supplementary Cementitious Material: A Review" Materials 15, no. 7: 2664. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15072664

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop