Next Article in Journal
Investigation of the TeO2/GeO2 Ratio on the Spectroscopic Properties of Eu3+-Doped Oxide Glasses for Optical Fiber Application
Next Article in Special Issue
High-Strength, Degradable and Recyclable Epoxy Resin Based on Imine Bonds for Its Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Composites
Previous Article in Journal
Materials AIILnInO4 with Ruddlesden-Popper Structure for Electrochemical Applications: Relationship between Ion (Oxygen-Ion, Proton) Conductivity, Water Uptake, and Structural Changes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fabrication of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS Composite Materials and Its Application for Oil-Water Separation

School of Petroleum Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(1), 115; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010115
Submission received: 30 November 2021 / Revised: 19 December 2021 / Accepted: 22 December 2021 / Published: 24 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Biobased Materials Application)

Abstract

:
The discharge of oily wastewater and oil spills at sea are the current difficulties in water pollution control. This problem often leads to terrible disasters. Therefore, the effective realization of oil-water separation is a very challenging problem. Superhydrophobic sponge is a promising oil-absorbing material. In this article, we reported a superhydrophobic sponge with nano-Fe3O4 for oil-water separation. The addition of nano-Fe3O4 allows the sponge to be recycled under the action of magnetic force. The sponge has the advantages of low cost, simple preparation and efficient oil-water separation. This kind of sponge is very worthy of promotion for the treatment of oily wastewater and marine oil spill accidents.

1. Introduction

Behind today’s rapid social and economic development is a large amount of industrial production and oily wastewater discharged from daily life [1,2,3]. At the same time, marine oil spills occur frequently [4,5,6]. These conditions will cause serious environmental problems during oil production [7,8]. As people’s awareness of protecting the ecological environment has gradually increased, the treatment of oily wastewater and marine oil spills has become more and more urgent. The realization of oil-water separation is the most fundamental measure to solve oil pollution to protect the environment and reduce economic waste [9,10,11]. Traditional oil-water separation methods mainly include flocculation [12], chemical degradation [13], biological filtration [14,15], etc. However, these methods have exposed the shortcomings of low separation efficiency, poor recyclability, and insufficient environmental protection in the face of increasingly severe oil pollution problems. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a new type of superhydrophobic material to achieve efficient and environmentally friendly oil-water separation.
The dip coating method has the characteristics of economy, environmental protection, high efficiency and simplicity. It is a hotspot method used in the preparation of hydrophobic and oil-absorbing materials in recent years [16,17]. The characteristics of low production cost and high porosity of modified oil-absorbing sponge also make people pay more attention to its oil-water separation ability [18]. Therefore, the preparation of superhydrophobic sponges by dipping method has attracted great interest. Modified polyurethane sponge has been widely used for oil-water separation. Lu [19] prepared superhydrophobic PDMS/ polyurethane sponge based on polyurethane sponge, but the preparation process requires the use of chromic acid solution which is harmful to the human body and the environment. Yang [20] prepared superhydrophobic/nanosilver polyurethane sponge, but the preparation process is cumbersome and costly. This shortcoming limits its application potential. In addition, polyurethane sponge has the disadvantages of flammability and low open cell rate. Last but not least, the polyurethane sponge will produce toxic smoke when it burns. These two shortcomings determine that the polyurethane sponge cannot achieve the purpose of environmental protection and high efficiency in the application of oil-water separation [21]. Melamine sponge(MS)is a low-density material formed by foaming after the reaction of formaldehyde-melamine copolymer. It has a three-dimensional porous structure with a porosity of more than 99% and does not produce toxic substances when burned. It exhibits excellent chemical stability and environmental protection features. The excellent chemical stability and environmental protection characteristics of melamine sponge make it an excellent adsorption carrier [22,23]. It must be noted that melamine sponge is naturally amphiphilic. There is nothing doubt that the melamine sponge can be used for oil-water separation only after being hydrophobically modified.
Considering the above advantages, this article chooses to use MS to prepare superhydrophobic sponge. The polydopamine coating [24,25] is formed by the oxidative polymerization of dopamine hydrochloride. Polydopamine has excellent adhesion [26] and can act as a “glue” for adhering nano-Fe3O4 and PDMS during the preparation process. The reason for choosing to add nano-Fe3O4 is to allow the sponge to recycle with the help of magnetic force after the oil-water separation work is finished. Recycling can reduce costs. PDMS can give MS excellent hydrophobic properties. With the method of dipping method, we finally obtain superhydrophobic melamine sponge (PDMS@Fe3O4/MS). The preparation process has low cost and simple operation which is more suitable for popularization and application.

2. Experimental Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Materials

Melamine sponge (Suzhou Huanxi Electronic Materials Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China), nano-Fe3O4 (20nm 99.0% metals basis, Aladdin Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), absolute ethanol (Tianjin Kaitong Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China), dopamine hydrochloride (Shanghai Maclean Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), cyclohexane (AR, Tianjin Komeo Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China), PDMS (Polydimethylsiloxane, Dow Corning, Midland, MI, USA), curing agent (Dow Corning).

2.2. Instrumentation and Characterization

ES type precision electronic balance (Xiamen Lai De Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Xiamen, China); SDC-200S type contact angle measuring instrument (Kunshan Shengding Industrial Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China); BILON3-120A Ultrasonic Cleaner (Shanghai Birang Instrument Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China); HJ-1 type magnetic heating and stirring (Shanghai Yuezhong Instrument Equipment Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China); DZF-6030 vacuum drying oven (Suzhou Namirui Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China); Apreo-2 Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (Beijing Oubotong Optical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China); Ultima IV X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku, Takatsuki, Osaka Prefecture, Japan); INVENIO R Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Karlsruhe, Germany).

2.3. Preparation of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS

(1)
Pretreatment of MS surface.
MS (20 mm × 20 mm × 20 mm) was cleaned twice with absolute ethanol and deionized water. Then put it in an air-drying oven at 45 °C for 6 h. Take it out after drying. The washed MS is shown in Figure 1a.
(2)
Polydopamine coating covers the MS skeleton.
Weigh 240 mg of dopamine hydrochloride powder and dissolve it into 60 mL of water to prepare a dopamine hydrochloride solution with a concentration of 4 mg/mL. Put the sponge into the dopamine hydrochloride solution, so that the inside of the MS is completely infiltrated by the dopamine hydrochloride solution. Then use a magnetic stirrer to stir for 1 h. Take out the MS and let it stand in the air for 24 h to allow the dopamine hydrochloride to fully oxidize and polymerize. The polymerization mechanism of dopamine hydrochloride is shown in Figure 2.
(3)
Sponge adhesion nano-Fe3O4.
Weigh 0.1 g of nano-Fe3O4 and pour it into a certain amount of ethanol solution to prepare a suspension. Then put the sponge into the solution and disperse ultrasonically for 1 h. After the sonication is completed, the sponge is placed in a constant temperature drying oven at 85 °C. Wait for the sponge to dry and take it out for later use.
(4)
PDMS treats sponge superhydrophobicity.
Manually stir a mixed solution of 1 g PDMS, 20 mL cyclohexane solution, and 0.1 g hardener for 1 min. Then the sponge is completely immersed in the configured solution, placed in a constant temperature drying box, and dried at 85 °C for 12 h. After PDMS@Fe3O4/MS is completely dried, take it out and cool it to room temperature, and then soak and clean it with absolute ethanol 3 times. After cleaning, let it dry and acquire PDMS@Fe3O4/MS, as shown in Figure 1b.

2.4. Calculation of Adsorption Capacity and Oil-Water Separation Efficiency

2.4.1. PDMS@Fe3O4/MS Adsorption Capacity Calculation

The absorption capacity of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS to oil is an important factor affecting its oil-water separation efficiency. In order to test the maximum oil absorption capacity of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS, we decided to use kerosene, 0#diesel oil and corn germ oil to test its adsorption capacity. Weigh 10 g of each oil product, and put PDMS@Fe3O4/MS into it. Take out the sponge after adsorption for 1 min. The calculation formula of adsorption capacity is as formula (1):
Q f = m 0 m m
In formula (1): Qf is the adsorption capacity, g/g; m is the mass of the PDMS@Fe3O4/MS, g; m 0 is the mass of the PDMS@Fe3O4/MS after oil absorption, g.

2.4.2. PDMS@Fe3O4/MS Oil-Water Separation Efficiency Calculation

The oil-water separation efficiency is a pivotal indicator to determine whether the modified sponge has pretty performance in treating oily wastewater. Weigh 5 g of edible oil, 0#diesel oil and kerosene and mix with 50 mL of water to prepare an oil-water mixture. Put PDMS@Fe3O4/MS into the three oil-water mixtures for oil-water separation test. Finally, the method of weighing is used to calculate the oil-water separation efficiency. The oil-water separation efficiency calculation formula is as formula (2):
R = C 1 C 2 C × 100 %
In formula (2): R is the oil-water separation efficiency, %; C is the initial mass of the oil phase, g; C1 is the mass of the oil-water mixture before separation, g; C2 is the mass of the oil-water mixture after separation, g.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization and Analysis of Original Sponge and Modified Sponge

Figure 3a–c are scanning electron micrographs of MS, Fe3O4/MS and PDMS@Fe3O4/MS 1 µm. Observing the picture (a), it can be found that the surface of the MS skeleton is smooth and flat. On the other hand, MS itself contains a large amount of hydrophilic amino groups, so MS cannot be used for oil-water separation. In Figure 3b, we can find that some substances are clearly attached to the Fe3O4/MS framework. The attachment is nano-Fe3O4, which is the most important thing to realize sponge recovery. The surface of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS in Figure 3c becomes rough, and the PDMS coverage makes the sponge have an excellent hydrophobic layer. This change greatly improves the hydrophobicity of the sponge. Figure 3d–f are the scanning electron micrographs of MS, Fe3O4/MS and PDMS@Fe3O4/MS 40 µm, respectively. The three pictures all reflect the inherent three-dimensional interconnection network, providing a large number of open pores. These abundant natural pores in the MS can provide more active sites for the adsorption of the target oil, which provides a great structural basis for oil-water separation.
Figure 4 shows the water contact angle test of the melamine sponge before and after treatment. Figure 4a is an image of MS water contact angle. The water droplet is sucked in immediately after contact with the sponge. The contact angle is 0°, showing a superhydrophilic state. Figure 4b is the water contact angle image of Fe3O4/MS. From the image, we can find that the water droplets are not completely absorbed by the sponge. This phenomenon indicates that Fe3O4/MS has improved hydrophobicity compared with MS. However, this hydrophobic ability is far from reaching the standard of superhydrophobicity. Figure 4c is an image of the water contact angle on the surface of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS prepared by the modification treatment. The water droplets are attached to the surface of the sponge in a spherical form, the water contact angle is 150.9°. A water contact angle of more than 150° indicates that the material has reached a superhydrophobic state. The superhydrophobic state ensures the feasibility of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS in the fields of oil absorption and oil-water separation.
In order to prove the existence of nano-Fe3O4 and PDMS crystal structure on the surface of the sponge, X-ray diffraction (XRD) test was performed on it. The XRD test result is shown in Figure 5. In the XRD pattern of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS, the diffraction peak with a 2θ of 11.39° is attributed to the characteristic diffraction peak of the PDMS crystal plane [27], indicating that the PDMS coating is well covered on the sponge skeleton. In the MS XRD diagram, the 2θ of 21.27° is the characteristic peak of MS, which is consistent with the standard card JCPDS#24-1923. However, the XRD patterns of Fe3O4/MS and PDMS@Fe3O4/MS at 2θ of 21.27° are smooth. This phenomenon indicates that the characteristic diffraction peaks of MS are covered by nano-Fe3O4 and PDMS. The characteristic diffraction peaks of nano-Fe3O4 appear near 35.14°, 55.78° and 63.25°. This is strong evidence that the nano-Fe3O4 successfully adhered to the sponge skeleton besides the characteristic diffraction peaks of MS were masked. The characteristic diffraction peak of nano-Fe3O4 with a 2θ of 35.14° is consistent with the peak of the standard card JCPDF#19-0629. MS has no characteristic diffraction peaks near 35.14°, 55.78°, and 63.25°, which also verifies this point.
According to the FTIR diagram of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS in Figure 6, we noticed that there is a strong symmetrical C-H stretching vibration peak of -CH3 at 2963 cm−1. The appearance of this characteristic peak indicates that PDMS has covered the sponge skeleton. At the same time, because the number of oxygen-containing groups on the surface of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS is reduced sharply at this time, the hydrophobicity and lipophilicity of the PDMS@Fe3O4/MS are improved. The rapid decrease in the number of oxygen-containing groups on the surface of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS is caused by PDMS coverage. This is very beneficial for improving the hydrophobicity and lipophilicity of the PDMS@Fe3O4/MS. It is worth noting that, compared with MS, the peak of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS at 3355 cm−1 almost disappears. This is also a sign of a significant reduction in oxygen-containing functional groups. This change promotes the hydrophobicity of the material and its performance is improved to a certain extent. Furthermore, the peaks at 810 cm−1 and 1334 cm−1 can be judged to be triazine ring bending vibration peaks of the triazine ring of MS [28,29] besides the peaks at 997 cm−1 are the C-H bending vibration peaks.

3.2. Modified Sponge Oil Absorption Capacity and Oil-Water Separation Test

3.2.1. Oil Absorption Capacity of Modified Sponge

Through formula (1), we calculated the adsorption capacity of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS for the three oil products. The adsorption capacity of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS for corn germ oil is 17.99 ± 0.26 g/g; the adsorption capacity of 0# diesel is 14.68 ± 0.21 g/g; the adsorption capacity of kerosene is 15.14 ± 0.38 g/g. The experimental results are shown in Figure 7. In view of the low adsorption capacity of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS, we conducted comparative experiments with MS (10 mm × 10 mm × 10 mm) and PDMS@Fe3O4/MS (10 mm × 10 mm × 10 mm). The experimental results are shown in Table 1. According to the information in the table, We can find that the initial mass difference between PDMS@Fe3O4/MS and MS is more than 6 times at the same volume, but their adsorption capacity for 0# diesel is almost the same. This indicates that hydrophobic modification will increase the weight of the sponge, but will not significantly affect the open volume of the sponge’s pores. As long as the pore volume of the sponge is not significantly reduced, the amount of grease absorbed by the sponge will not decrease. Therefore, the adsorption capacity of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS is great well.

3.2.2. Modified Sponge Oil-Water Separation Test

In Figure 8, the oil-water separation efficiency of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS for corn germ oil/water mixture, 0#diesel/water mixture and kerosene/water mixture are 98.78 ± 0.023%, 99.34 ± 0.045% and 98.80 ± 0.019%. This is the result calculated according to formula (2). This efficient oil-water separation performance is determined by the three-dimensional porous structure of MS and the excellent hydrophobic properties of the PDMS coating.

3.2.3. Modified Sponge Repeated Oil Absorption and Oil-Water Separation Performance Test

The mechanical squeeze method is used to measure the reusability of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS. The PDMS@Fe3O4/MS is used to repeatedly absorb and deoil the oil-water mixture of corn germ oil, 0#diesel oil, kerosene and three kinds of oil products. The adsorption capacity and oil-water separation efficiency were measured after a certain number of oil absorption and deoiling. We measured the adsorption capacity and oil-water separation efficiency of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS after deoiling 5 times, 10 times, 15 times and 20 times. Table 2 shows the adsorption capacity of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS after deoiling 5 times, 10 times, 15 times and 20 times. Table 3 shows the oil-water separation efficiency of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS after deoiling 5 times, 10 times, 15 times, and 20 times. Figure 9 is a graph showing changes in adsorption capacity of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS after repeated oil absorption and deoiling. Figure 10 is a graph showing the change in oil-water separation efficiency of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS after repeated oil absorption and deoiling.
After PDMS@Fe3O4/MS undergoes multiple oil absorption-deoil cycles, the oil absorption capacity and oil-water separation efficiency are reduced. There are two main reasons for this phenomenon. First of all, the method of mechanical extrusion severely damaged the structure of the sponge. The morphology of the sponge has undergone significant changes after repeated oil absorption and deoiling. The elasticity of the sponge begins to weaken at the same time. Mechanical squeezing made it lose the ability to restore its original shape. Figure 11a,b shows the appearance of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS after deoiling 5 times, 10 times, 15 times, and 20 times. Secondly, the mechanical squeeze method cannot completely squeeze the oil inside the sponge. There is bound to be a slight oil residue inside the sponge. Figure 11c shows that the paper towel absorbs the residual oil of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS.

3.3. Test of Modified Sponge Affected by Magnetic Force

Put the superhydrophobic melamine sponge into a beaker with a certain amount of water and the sponge will be suspended on the surface of the water. With a magnet slowly approaching the beaker, the nano-Fe3O4 [30,31] on the surface and inside of the sponge drives the sponge to move rapidly from the middle of the beaker to the side of the beaker under the action of magnetic force, as shown in Figure 12. This feature allows PDMS@Fe3O4/MS to move according to whether the oil stains in the area have been absorbed. After the oil-water separation in one area is completed, the sponge is driven to move to other oil-bearing areas by magnetic force. In this way, the sponge can separate oil and water more efficiently. Moreover, the most important thing is that it can be recycled with the help of magnetism. The recycled sponge can be reused after being mechanically squeezed, which can greatly reduce the cost of oil-water separation.

4. Conclusions

This article is based on the melamine sponge through the oxidative polymerization of dopamine hydrochloride, nano-Fe3O4 adsorption and PDMS modification to obtain superhydrophobic magnetic melamine sponge. This superhydrophobic magnetic melamine sponge has a three-dimensional porous structure with a PDMS coating on the surface. The PDMS coating makes the sponge have excellent superhydrophobicity. The test shows that the water contact angle is 150.9°, and the oil contact angle is 0°. The sponge has excellent oil absorption capacity and excellent oil-water separation ability, and can absorb oil products of more than 14 times its own mass, and the separation efficiency of oil-water mixture can be as high as 99.34% in a single time. The sponge also has excellent reusability. After 20 oil absorption and deoiling operations, the sponge can still absorb up to 12.57 times of its own oil, reaching an oil-water separation efficiency of more than 70%. In addition, nano-Fe3O4 can make the sponge magnetic. This feature allows the sponge to move regionally under the action of magnetic force to improve the efficiency of oil-water separation; on the other hand, the staff can also use the magnetic force to recycle the sponge. The large-scale application of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS in waste oil treatment and recycling is very worthy of promotion.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.W. and Q.L.; methodology, J.W.; software, Q.T.; validation, Q.L., Z.F. and Q.T.; formal analysis, B.W.; investigation, J.W.; resources, Z.F.; data curation, Q.T.; writing—original draft preparation, J.W.; writing—review and editing, Q.L., Z.F. and B.W.; visualization, Q.T.; supervision, Q.L.; project administration, Z.F.; funding acquisition, Z.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The project is supported by Heilongjiang Province Natural Science Foundation of “Study on flocculation of oilfield wastewater with magnetic nano-materials Fe3O4@SiO2-NH2”. Fund No.: LH2020E014.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This article does not involve human or animal research.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also forms part of an ongoing study.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors disclosed no relevant relationships.

References

  1. Chan, Y.J.; Chong, M.F.; Law, C.L.; Hassell, D.G. A review on anaerobic-aerobic treatment of industrial and municipal wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 155, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, P.; Xu, Z. Mineral-Coated Polymer Membranes with Superhydrophilicity and Underwater Superoleophobicity for Effective Oil/Water Separation. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Li, B.; Wu, L.; Li, L.; Seeger, S.; Zhang, J.; Wang, A. Superwetting double-layer polyester materials for effective removal of both insoluble oils and soluble dyes in water. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 11581–11588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Aurell, J.; Gullett, B. Aerostat sampling of PCDD/PCDF emissions from the Gulf oil spill in situ burns. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 9431–9437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shen, T. It’s all caused by oil spills–The most serious series of offshore oil spills in history. Ocean. World 2010, 7, 28–31. [Google Scholar]
  6. Jin, M.; Wang, J.; Yao, X.; Liao, M.; Zhao, Y.; Jiang, L. Underwater oil capture by a three-dimensional network architectured organosilane surface. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 2861–2864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Besharati Fard, M.; Hamidi, D.; Alavi, J.; Jamshidian, R.; Pendashteh, A.; Mirbagheri, S.A. Saline oily wastewater treatment using Lallemantia mucilage as a natural coagulant: Kinetic study, process optimization, and modeling. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 163, 113326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Aisien, F.; Hymore, F.; Ebewele, R. Potential application of recycled rubber in oil pollution control. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2003, 85, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, J.Y.; Yan, L.; Li, S.P.; Xu, X.R. Treatment of aging oily wastewater by demulsification/flocculation. Environ. Lett. 2016, 51, 798–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ge, J.; Shi, L.-A.; Wang, Y.-C.; Zhao, H.-Y.; Yao, H.-B.; Zhu, Y.-B.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, H.-W.; Wu, H.-A.; Yu, S.-H. Joule-heated graphene-wrapped sponge enables fast clean-up of viscous crude-oil spill. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12, 434–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cheryan, M.; Rajagopalan, N. Membrane processing of oily streams. Wastewater treatment and waste reduction. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 151, 13–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rubí, H.; Fall, C.; Ortega, R. Pollutant removal from oily wastewater discharged from car washes through sedimentation-coagulation. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 59, 2359–2369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhu, S.; Xiang, Q.; Ma, C.; Ren, Y.; Qiu, K. Continuous electrocoagulation degradation of oily wastewater with Fe78Si9B13 amorphous ribbons. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 40101–40108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Salahi, A.; Mohammadi, T. Experimental investigation of oily wastewater treatment using combined membrane systems. Water Sci. Technol. A J. Int. Assoc. Water Pollut. Research. 2010, 62, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, Q.; Wang, H.; Xiong, S.; Chen, R.; Wang, Y. Extremely efficient and recyclable absorbents for oily pollutants enabled by ultrathin-layered functionalization. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 18816–18823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yang, C.; Li, J.; Wang, J. Synthesis strategy of modified sponge and its oil-water separation application research progress. New Chem. Mater. 2020, 48, 18–21. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tao, J.; Sun, G.; Wu, G.; Guo, L.; Zhong, Y.; Wnag, M.; You, B. An innovative study on low surface energy micronano coatings with multilevel structures for laminar flow design. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2019, 32, 577–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mirhosseinian, N.; Anbia, M.; Salehi, S. Preparation and characterization of superhydrophobic melamine and melamine-derived carbon sponges modified with reduced graphene oxide–TiO2 nanocomposite as oil absorbent materials. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 1536–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lu, F.; Li, C.; Wang, H.; Li, L.; Ye, H.; Chen, J. Preparation of superhydrophobic and lipophilic sponge material and separation of oil and water. Ship Ocean. Eng. 2021, 37, 59–62. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yang, X.; Shuai, Q.; Luo, Y.; Dong, Y.; Tan, M.; Chen, B. Preparation and application of polydimethylsiloxane/micronanosilver/polydopamine modified superhydrophobic sponge. Appl. Chem. 2015, 32, 726–732. [Google Scholar]
  21. Xu, X.; Liu, C.; Ma, J.; Li, X. Preparation of superhydrophobic and super lipophilic melamine sponge and its oil-water separation performance. Chin. J. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 39, 686–691. [Google Scholar]
  22. Oribayo, O.; Feng, X.; Rempel, G.L.; Pan, Q. Modification of formaldehyde-melamine-sodium bisulfite copolymer foam and its application as effective sorbents for clean-up of oil spills. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2017, 160, 384–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, Y.; Song, S.; Zhao, Z. Graphene oxide (GO)/polyacrylamide (PAM) composite hydrogels as efficient cationic dye adsorbents. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 2017, 513, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huang, S. Mussel-Inspired One-Step Copolymerization to Engineer Hierarchically Structured Surface with Superhydrophobic Properties for Removing Oil from Water. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 17144–17150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, H.; Wang, E.; Liu, Z.; Gao, D.; Yuan, R.; Sun, L.; Zhu, Y. A novel carbon nanotubes reinforced superhydrophobic and superoleophilic polyurethane sponge for selective oil-water separation through a chemical fabrication. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ning, C.; Bai, Y.; Barras, A.; Szunerits, S. Polyurethane sponge functionalized with superhydrophobic nanodiamond particles for efficient oil/water separation. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 307, 319–325. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kaneko, Y.; Iyi, N.; Matsumoto, T.; Kitamura, K. Preparation of higher-ordered inorganic-organic nanocomposite composed of rodlike cationic PDMS and polyacrylate. J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15, 1572–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gao, C.; Moya, S.; Lichtenfeld, H.; Casoli, A.; Fiedler, H.; Donath, E.; Möhwald, H. The decomposition process of melamine formaldehyde cores: The key step in the fabrication of ultrathin polyelectrolyte multilayer capsules. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2001, 286, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Stolz, A.; Le Floch, S.; Reinert, L.; Ramos, S.M.M.; Tuaillon-Combes, J.; Soneda, Y.; Chaudet, P.; Baillis, D.; Blanchard, N.; Duclaux, L.; et al. Melamine-derived carbon sponges for oil-water separation. Carbon 2016, 107, 198–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Han, M.; Hao, H.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y. Preparation and application of nano-ferric oxide. Low Carbon World 2021, 11, 231–232. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang, X.; Liang, X.; Pi, N.; Yang, H.; Liu, X.; Yang, Y. Effects of pretreatment for micron glass on its nano-Fe3O4 coating layer. Glas. Phys. Chem. 2015, 41, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) MS and (b) PDMS@Fe3O4/MS.
Figure 1. (a) MS and (b) PDMS@Fe3O4/MS.
Materials 15 00115 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the oxidative polymerization mechanism of dopamine hydrochloride.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the oxidative polymerization mechanism of dopamine hydrochloride.
Materials 15 00115 g002
Figure 3. (ac) are the scanning electron micrographs of MS, Fe3O4/MS and PDMS@Fe3O4/MS 1 µm and (df) are MS, Fe3O4 /MS and PDMS@Fe3O4/MS 40 µm scanning electron micrograph.
Figure 3. (ac) are the scanning electron micrographs of MS, Fe3O4/MS and PDMS@Fe3O4/MS 1 µm and (df) are MS, Fe3O4 /MS and PDMS@Fe3O4/MS 40 µm scanning electron micrograph.
Materials 15 00115 g003
Figure 4. (a) MS water contact angle image, (b) Fe3O4/MS water contact angle image and (c) PDMS@Fe3O4/MS water contact angle image.
Figure 4. (a) MS water contact angle image, (b) Fe3O4/MS water contact angle image and (c) PDMS@Fe3O4/MS water contact angle image.
Materials 15 00115 g004
Figure 5. XRD patterns of MS, Fe3O4/MS and PDMS@Fe3O4/MS.
Figure 5. XRD patterns of MS, Fe3O4/MS and PDMS@Fe3O4/MS.
Materials 15 00115 g005
Figure 6. FTIR diagrams of MS, Fe3O4/MS and PDMS@Fe3O4/MS (The shadows from left to right are 3355 cm−1, 2963 cm−1, 1334 cm−1, 997 cm−1 and 810 cm−1).
Figure 6. FTIR diagrams of MS, Fe3O4/MS and PDMS@Fe3O4/MS (The shadows from left to right are 3355 cm−1, 2963 cm−1, 1334 cm−1, 997 cm−1 and 810 cm−1).
Materials 15 00115 g006
Figure 7. The oil absorption capacity of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS for different oils.
Figure 7. The oil absorption capacity of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS for different oils.
Materials 15 00115 g007
Figure 8. Separation efficiency of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS for different oil-water mixtures.
Figure 8. Separation efficiency of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS for different oil-water mixtures.
Materials 15 00115 g008
Figure 9. Adsorption capacity of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS after multiple cycles.
Figure 9. Adsorption capacity of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS after multiple cycles.
Materials 15 00115 g009
Figure 10. Oil-water separation efficiency after multiple cycles of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS.
Figure 10. Oil-water separation efficiency after multiple cycles of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS.
Materials 15 00115 g010
Figure 11. (a,b) the appearance of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS after deoiling 5 times, 10 times, 15 times, and 20 times and (c) The paper towel absorbs the residual oil in the sponge.
Figure 11. (a,b) the appearance of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS after deoiling 5 times, 10 times, 15 times, and 20 times and (c) The paper towel absorbs the residual oil in the sponge.
Materials 15 00115 g011
Figure 12. (a) PDMS@Fe3O4/MS is at rest on the water surface and (b) PDMS@Fe3O4/MS is close to the cup wall under magnetic force.
Figure 12. (a) PDMS@Fe3O4/MS is at rest on the water surface and (b) PDMS@Fe3O4/MS is close to the cup wall under magnetic force.
Materials 15 00115 g012
Table 1. Comparison of adsorption capacity of MS and PDMS@Fe3O4/MS.
Table 1. Comparison of adsorption capacity of MS and PDMS@Fe3O4/MS.
SpongeInitial Mass/gMass after Adsorption/gThe Mass of Adsorbed Oil/gAdsorption Capacity
g/g
MS0.032.812.7993
PDMS@Fe3O4/MS0.192.942.7514.49
Table 2. Adsorption capacity of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS after multiple cycles.
Table 2. Adsorption capacity of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS after multiple cycles.
Oil5 Times (g/g)10 Times (g/g)15 Times (g/g)20 Times (g/g)
Corn gern oil15.20 ± 0.2114.27 ± 0.2513.19 ± 0.1912.32 ± 0.23
0#Diesel fuel12.26 ± 0.2112.04 ± 0.2411.50 ± 0.2311.14 ± 0.22
Kerosene13.13 ± 0.3412.89 ± 0.3112.74 ± 0.3712.57 ± 0.35
Table 3. Oil-water separation efficiency after multiple cycles of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS.
Table 3. Oil-water separation efficiency after multiple cycles of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS.
Oil5 Times (%)10 Times (%)15 Times (%)20 Times (%)
Corn gern oil97.28 ± 0.02393.02 ± 0.02183.16 ± 0.02974.98 ± 0.027
0#Diesel fuel96.53 ± 0.04192.47 ± 0.03987.35 ± 0.04176.02 ± 0.037
Kerosene97.43 ± 0.02091.60 ± 0.02284.79 ± 0.01873.94 ± 0.024
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, J.; Fan, Z.; Liu, Q.; Tong, Q.; Wang, B. Fabrication of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS Composite Materials and Its Application for Oil-Water Separation. Materials 2022, 15, 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010115

AMA Style

Wang J, Fan Z, Liu Q, Tong Q, Wang B. Fabrication of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS Composite Materials and Its Application for Oil-Water Separation. Materials. 2022; 15(1):115. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010115

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Jiaqi, Zhenzhong Fan, Qingwang Liu, Qilei Tong, and Biao Wang. 2022. "Fabrication of PDMS@Fe3O4/MS Composite Materials and Its Application for Oil-Water Separation" Materials 15, no. 1: 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010115

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop