Next Article in Journal
Impact of Rehabilitation on Outcomes after TAVI: A Preliminary Study
Next Article in Special Issue
The C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio as a Predictor of Mortality in Critically Ill Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Fetal Renal Echogenicity Associated with Maternal Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: The Effect of Transplacental Transmission of Permeability Factor suPAR
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fibrosis Staging Using Direct Serum Biomarkers is Influenced by Hepatitis Activity Grading in Hepatitis C Virus Infection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 7
Issue 10
10.3390/jcm7100325
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of Statin Added to Systemic Anticancer Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials

by
Hyun Joo Jang
1,*,†,
Hyeong Su Kim
2,†,
Jung Han Kim
2,* and
Jin Lee
1
1
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dongtan Sacred-Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwasung 18450, Gyeonggi-Do, Korea
2
Division of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul 07441, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
H.J.J. and H.S.K. equally contributed to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7(10), 325; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7100325
Submission received: 30 August 2018 / Revised: 25 September 2018 / Accepted: 2 October 2018 / Published: 4 October 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Analytical Methods in Clinical Diagnosis and Therapy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Preclinical studies have demonstrated that statins have anticancer properties and act in an additive or synergistic way when combined with anticancer therapy. We conducted this meta-analysis of randomized, controlled phase II or III trials to evaluate the effect of statins added to systemic anticancer therapy in patients with solid cancer. A systematic literature search was performed to identify all randomized trials that were designed to investigate the effect of statins in patients with cancer using PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Web of Science (up to August 2018). From eight randomized controlled trials, 1760 patients were included in the pooled analyses of odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for grade 3–5 adverse events (AEs) and overall response rate (ORR) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The addition of statin to anticancer agents did not significantly increase the incidence of grade 3–5 AEs (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.81–1.29, p = 0.78). However, the combination of statin and anticancer agents did not improve ORR (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.77–1.20, p = 0.72) compared with that of anticancer therapy alone. In addition, statins added to systemic anticancer therapy failed to prolong PFS (HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.90–1.10, p = 0.92) and OS (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.76–1.11, p = 0.52). In conclusion, this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials does not support clinical benefits of statins added to systemic anticancer therapy in patients with solid cancer.

1. Introduction

Statins are inhibitors of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, which is the rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol formation. Numerous studies have demonstrated that statins can not only decrease serum total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations, but also reduce ischemic cardiovascular disease-related morbidity and mortality [1,2]. Thus, statins are inexpensive and effective agents for prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease.
For more than a decade, however, there had been a scientific debate on the association between long-term use of statins and the risk of developing cancer. Since experimental studies suggested that statins may be carcinogenic [3], clinical trials observed a significant increased incidence of cancer in patients treated with statins [4,5]. However, other studies yielded different results that statins had no relationship with cancer risk [6,7,8]. Statins inhibit the rate-limiting step of the mevalonate pathway in which mevalonic acid is the precursor in the biosynthesis of isoprenoid molecules such as cholesterol, dolichol, and ubiquinone. Mevalonate-derived prenyl groups, farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP) and geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP), facilitate intracellular functions of various proteins [9,10]. FPP and GGPP are essential substrates for posttranslational modification of rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (RAS) and RAS homologue (RHO), which have important roles in growth, proliferation, migration, and survival [11]. Based on the role of statin on the posttranslational modifications of RAS and RHO, its potential antitumor effect has also been investigated [12,13,14,15,16]. Experimental studies have demonstrated that statins can inhibit tumor growth and induce apoptosis in a variety of cancer cell lines, including colorectal cancer (CRC) [12], pancreatic cancer (PC) [13], cholangiocarcinoma [14], breast cancer [15], and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) [16]. In addition, many observational studies have reported that stains can reduce recurrence or mortality in various types of cancer [17,18,19,20,21,22].
Statins may act in additive or synergistic ways when combined with anticancer agents. Indeed, many preclinical studies have demonstrated the synergistic interaction of statins with chemotherapeutic agents, such as doxorubicin [15], paclitaxel [23], 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) [24], platinum [25], irinotecan [26], gemcitabine [27], and gefitinib [28]. In addition, a phase II study reported that simvastatin in combination with irinotecan/5-FU/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) chemotherapy was effective and feasible with no additive side-effects in patients with metastatic CRC [29].
Based on these observations, randomized phase II or III clinical trials have been conducted to investigate the effect of adding statins to anticancer treatment in various types of cancer [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. Whereas the first randomized trial of pravastatin in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) reported a 9-month increase of overall survival (OS) [30], other randomized, controlled trials failed to demonstrate a significant improvement of clinical outcomes in patients treated with statin in combination with anticancer agents [31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. However, the results were inconclusive because some studies had a small sample size with a lack of blinding. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials to evaluate the effect of statin added to systemic anticancer therapy.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

This meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [38,39]. A systematic literature search was performed to identify all randomized, controlled trials that were specifically designed to evaluate the effect of statins among patients with cancer using PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Web of Science (up to August 2018). The following search terms were used: “hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor” or “HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor” or “statin” or “pravastatin” or “simvastatin” or “fluvastatin” or “atorvastatin” or “rosuvastatin” or “lovastatin” AND “carcinoma” or “cancer” or “neoplasm” or “malignancy” AND “randomized.” All eligible studies were retrieved and their bibliographies were checked for other relevant publications. We also scanned the reference lists of the retrieved articles. We did not contact authors of the original studies for additional information.

2.2. Selection Criteria

Eligible studies met the following inclusion criteria: (i) randomized clinical trial in malignant solid tumors; (ii) randomization of patients to systemic anticancer therapy with or without a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin); (iii) sufficient data for odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for overall response rate (ORR) or grade 3–5 adverse events (AEs) and/or hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI for progression-free survival (PFS) or OS; (iv) studies published only in peer-reviewed journals; and (v) articles written in English.

2.3. Data Extraction

Two investigators (H.J.J. and H.S.K.) independently screened relevant studies. They carefully checked the titles and abstracts from the initial search and excluded articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria. Then, the eligible articles were completely reviewed and the needed data were extracted. Any disagreement was resolved through discussion with the principle investigator (J.H.K.).
The following data were gathered from the included studies: first author, year of publication, trial phase, treatment setting and regimen, primary endpoint, number of patients, ORR, incidence of grade 3–5 AEs, and survival outcomes (PFS and/or OS) along with their HRs with 95% CIs. When both univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to get the HR for PFS or OS, the data from multivariate analysis were selected preferentially.

2.4. Statistical Analyses

Statistical values used in the analyses were directly extracted from the original articles. If HRs with their 95% CIs were not provided, the Engauge Digitizer software was used to estimate them from the Kaplan-Meier curves.
The RevMan version 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark) was used to combine the data. The heterogeneity across studies was estimated by using the I2 inconsistency test and Cochran’s Q statistic test. The fixed-effect model (Mantel–Haenszel method) was selected if there was no substantial heterogeneity (p ≥ 0.1 or I2 ≤ 50%). When significant heterogeneity was observed (p < 0.1 and I2 > 50%), the random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird method) was adopted. We planned to perform additional subgroup analyses to identify the source of heterogeneity. The plots show a summary estimate of the results from all studies pooled. The size of each square represents the estimate from each trial, reflecting its statistical weight. Outcomes are shown as forest plots with diamonds representing the estimate of the pooled effect. The width of each diamond indicates its precision. The line of no effect is number one for binary outcomes, which implies statistical significance if not crossed by the diamond [40]. Statistical significance of the pooled HR or OR was determined by the Z-test. The pooled OR < 1.0 and HR < 1.0 indicate higher rate and better survival, respectively, for the addition of statin to anticancer therapy.
Publication bias was assessed graphically by the Begg’s funnel plot and quantified by the Egger’s test [41,42]. Statistical significance was considered for a p-value of less than 0.05.

2.5. Quality of the Included Studies

The methodological quality of the randomized trials was scored using the Jadad five-item scale, taking into account randomization, double blinding process, and withdrawals or dropouts [43]. The final score ranged from 0 to 5, with high quality studies having a score of ≥3.

3. Results

3.1. Results of Search

The flow diagram of the search process is shown in Figure 1. A total of 317 potentially relevant articles were initially retrieved after removing duplicates, but 299 of them were excluded after careful screening of the titles and abstracts. Of the remaining 18 potentially eligible studies, 10 were further excluded by the inclusion criteria. Eventually, the eight randomized studies fulfilling the eligibility criteria were included in the meta-analysis [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37].

3.2. Characteristics of the Included Studies

Table 1 summarizes the main characteristics and clinical outcomes of the eight eligible studies. Most studies were conducted in patients with advanced or metastatic cancer. The studies enrolled patients with various types of cancer, including HCC [30], gastric cancer (GC) [31,33], PC [34], CRC [35], SCLC [36], and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [32,37]. The used statin was pravastatin (40 mg/day) in three trials and simvastatin (40 mg/day) in five. Four studies adopted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, clinical trial design [33,34,35,36]. The Jadad score was more than 3 in seven studies, indicating a good quality of the trials; one study [31] had a Jadad score of 2.

3.3. Impact of Statin Addition on Severe Adverse Events

From five studies [32,33,34,35,36], a total of 1579 patients were included in combining ORs with 95% CIs for severe AEs. There was no significant heterogeneity among the studies (X2 = 3.16, p = 0.53, I2 = 0%) and the fixed-effect model was selected. Statins added to anticancer agents did not significantly increase the incidence of grade 3–5 AEs (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.81–1.29, p = 0.78) (Figure 2A).

3.4. Effect of Statin Addition on Overall Response Rate

From seven studies [31,32,33,34,35,36,37], 1677 patients were included in pooling ORs with 95% CIs for ORR. There was no significant heterogeneity across the studies (X2 = 3.02, p = 0.81, I2 = 0%) and the fixed-effect model was used. The addition of statin to anticancer agents did not increase ORR (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.77–1.20, p = 0.72) (Figure 2B).

3.5. Effect of Statin Addition on Progression-Free Survival

From seven studies [31,32,33,34,35,36,37], a total of 1677 patients were included in the pooled analysis of HRs with 95% CIs for PFS. Because there was no significant heterogeneity among the studies (X2 = 4.52, p = 0.61, I2 = 0%), the fixed-effect model was selected. The addition of statin to anticancer agents showed no significant impact on PFS (HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.90–1.10, p = 0.92) (Figure 3A).

3.6. Effect of Statin Addition on Overall Survival

From eight studies [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37], a total of 1760 patients were included in the pooled analysis of HRs with 95% CIs for OS. There was a significant heterogeneity among the studies (X2 = 16.15, p = 0.02, I2= 57%) and the random-effects model was adopted. The addition of statin to anticancer therapy showed no significant impact on OS (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.76–1.11, p = 0.36) (Figure 3B).

3.7. Publication Bias

We did not perform a publication bias test for grade 3–5 AEs because of a limited number of studies included. Visual inspection of the funnel plots for ORR (Figure 4A), PFS (Figure 4B), and OS (Figure 4C) indicated that there was no substantial publication bias. Egger’s tests also demonstrated the absence of significant publication biases (p = 0.198 for ORR, p = 0.991 for PFS, and p = 0.126 for OS, respectively).

4. Discussion

There has been growing interest in the effect of lipid-lowering agents among patients with cancer based on preclinical evidence of their antiproliferative, proapoptotic, anti-invasive, and radiosensitizing properties [12,13,14,15,16,44], This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the role of statins in the fight against cancer. The results indicated that the addition of satin to systemic anticancer therapy was not associated with improved clinical outcomes. To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials regarding the effects of statins added to systemic anticancer treatment.
Statins inhibit HMG-CoA reductase to lower mevalonic acid and its downstream products, many of which play important roles in critical cellular functions such as membrane integrity, cell signaling, protein synthesis, and cell cycle progression [11]. Therefore, perturbation of these processes by statins in cancer cells may result in control of tumor initiation, growth, and metastasis [45,46]. Preclinical studies have observed positive effects for statins in various cancer cell lines, including reduced proliferation and migration, increased apoptosis, and reduced tumor growth [12,13,14,15,16]. Many observational studies have also reported that stains can reduce recurrence or mortality in patients with various types of cancer [17,18,19,20,21,22]. In addition, a couple of phase II studies reported that statins in combination with chemotherapy was feasible and effective in patients with metastatic CRC [29] or extensive SCLC [47].
The first randomized controlled trial on the addition of statin to standard treatment was conducted in patients with HCC [30]. Eighty-three patients underwent transcatheter arterial embolization followed by oral 5-FU (200 mg/d) for 2 months. Patients were then randomly assigned to a control (n = 42) or pravastatin (40 mg/d) group (n = 41). Although this study was limited by a lack of blinding and small sample size, the results were promising. Median OS was 18 months in the pravastatin arm versus 9 months in control (p = 0.0006). The Cox proportional hazard model indicated pravastatin as a significant prognostic factor (HR = 0.35, 95% CI: 01.7–0.61, p = 0.005). Based on the promising results in retrospective studies or prospective phase II trials [29,30,47,48], seven randomized, controlled phase II or III trials in GC [31,33], PC [34], CRC [35], SCLC [36], and NSCLC [32,37] were published between 2010 and 2017. The statins (pravastain or simvastatin) was combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy or targeted therapy (gefitinib or afatinib). However, no studies indicated the addition of statin to anticancer agents to be more effective, compared with standard anticancer therapy alone.
This meta-analysis of the eight randomized, controlled trials revealed that the statins in combination with systemic anticancer therapy failed to draw any clinical benefits in patients with solid cancer. Statins as a group are generally well tolerated although muscle toxicity and asymptomatic liver enzyme elevation have been reported. In this meta-analysis, the addition of pravastatin or simvastatin to anticancer agents did not significantly increase the incidence of grade 3–5 AEs (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.81–1.29, p = 0.78). However, the combination of statin and anticancer agents did not improve the radiological tumor response (OR of ORR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.77–1.20, p = 0.72) compared with that of anticancer therapy alone. In agreement with the ORR result, statins added to systemic anticancer therapy failed to prolong PFS (HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.90–1.10, p = 0.92) and OS (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.76–1.11, p = 0.52).
Several possibilities may explain the reasons why the addition of statins to anticancer agents failed to generate clinical benefits in patients with solid cancer. First, there might be actually no beneficial effects of statins added to anticancer agents in patients with solid cancer. There is no shortage of examples where compelling observational evidence of a drug effect fails to be demonstrated in randomized, controlled trials. A meta-analysis of 175,000 people from 27 randomized trials of statin therapy for cardiovascular prevention failed to show beneficial effects on the incidence of, or mortality from, any type of cancer [49]. The impressive effect of statins in reducing the incidence of and mortality from cancer might be associated with time-related biases (e.g., immortal time bias) in some observational studies [50]. Second, as we know, cancer is not a homogeneous disease entity. Therefore, the effects of statins may significantly differ according to anatomical site and molecular type of cancers. Of interest, a study in glioblstoma cells suggested that statins might fail to work in certain cancer cells because of a phosphatidylinostitol 3-kinase-mediated pathway connected to LDL receptors [51]. It is not known if this might affect the responsiveness to statins in other types of cancer. Third, the dose of statins adopted in the clinical trials might be insufficient. The mechanism of postulated anticancer effect depends on the inhibition of posttranslational processing via perturbation of the mevalonate pathway, the same mechanism involved in cholesterol synthesis. The statins in the included trials were administered at the same dosage as usually used in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. However, the optimal dose of statins to display anticancer effects is not known. Although Lee at al. suggested an antitumor effect of simvastatin using a dose level that is equivalent to the accepted cardiovascular therapeutic dose level [29,52], other studies demonstrating anticancer effects have used high statin concentration that are not feasible for human use [53,54]. Fourth, there might be a particular group of patients who benefit more from the addition of statins to anticancer therapy. Lim et al. observed that simvastatin enhanced the antitumor activity of cetuximab in CRC cells carrying Kirsten-RAS (KRAS) mutations [35]. Statins may inhibit the expression of the mutant KRAS phenotype by preventing the prenylation of the KRAS protein and normalizing the phenotype into KRAS wild type and, therefore, rendering KRAS mutant CRCs sensitive to monoclonal antibodies at epidermal growth factor receptors [55]. Lim et al. hypothesized that statins might overcome cetuximab resistance in KRAS mutant CRC cells. However, statin use was not associated with improved PFS in patients treated with cetuximab for KRAS mutant metastatic CRC [56]. Another hypothesis is that anticancer effects of statins might be limited in advanced or metastatic settings with a large tumor burden. Many observational studies have reported that statin was associated with improved recurrence-free survival or reduced risk of death when used after curative resection of cancer [19,21,57]. However, a relatively small number of studies has focused on the effect of statins in advanced or metastatic settings [29,47]. In this meta-analysis, six studies were conducted in patients with advanced or metastatic cancer and no clinical benefits were observed [31,32,33,34,35,37].
This study has some inherent limitations. First, the small number of included studies is a major limitation of this meta-analysis. Thus, we could not perform subgroup analysis according to the primary site of cancers. Second, patients had different tumor types and received various therapeutic regimens in the different treatment settings (first-line or salvage setting). Third, there was a significant heterogeneity among the studies (X2 = 16.15, p = 0.02, I2 = 57%) when pooling HRs for OS, which was primarily associated with the study by Kawata et al. [30]. The heterogeneity could not be completely interpreted although the random-effects model was selected. Finally, articles published only in English were included, which might have lead to selection bias.

5. Conclusions

This meta-analysis of randomized, controlled, phase II or III trials does not support clinical benefits of statins added to systemic anticancer therapy in patients with solid cancer. However, further investigations are needed to resolve the issues (dose and type of statin, treatment setting, particular cancer type, or biomarkers) regarding the addition of statins to systemic anticancer therapy.

Author Contributions

J.H.K. and J.L. designed the study. H.S.K. and H.J.J. searched the literature and extracted the data. H.S.K performed the statistical analyses. H.J.J. and J.H.K. wrote the manuscript.

Funding

This work had no specific funding.

Abbreviations

CIconfidence interval
CRCcolorectal cancer
GCgastric cancer
HCChepatocellular carcinoma
HMG-CoA3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A
HRhazard ratio
LDLlow-density lipoprotein
Non-ADCnon-adenoarcinomatous
NSCLCnon-small-cell lung cancer
PCpancreatic cancer
PFSprogression-free survival
ORodds ratio
OSoverall survival
SCLCsmall-cell lung cancer

References

  1. Delahoy, P.J.; Magliano, D.J.; Webb, K.; Grobler, M.; Liew, D. The relationship between reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by statins and reduction in risk of cardiovascular outcomes: an updated meta-analysis. Clin. Ther. 2009, 31, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Afilalo, J.; Duque, G.; Steele, R.; Jukema, J.W.; de Craen, A.J.; Eisenberg, M.J. Statins for secondary prevention in elderly patients: a hierarchical bayesian meta-analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008, 51, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Newman, T.B.; Hulley, S.B. Carcinogenicity of lipid-lowering drugs. JAMA 1996, 275, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Friedman, G.D.; Flick, E.D.; Udaltsova, N.; Chan, J.; Quesenberry, C.P., Jr.; Habel, L.A. Screening statins for possible carcinogenic risk: up to 9 years of follow-up of 361,859 recipients. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2008, 17, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shepherd, J.; Blauw, G.J.; Murphy, M.B.; Bollen, E.L.; Buckley, B.M.; Cobbe, S.M.; Ford, I.; Gaw, A.; Hyland, M.; Jukema, J.W.; et al. Pravastatin in elderly individuals at risk of vascular disease (PROSPER): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002, 360, 1623–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fulcher, J.; O’Connell, R.; Voysey, M.; Emberson, J.; Blackwell, L.; Mihaylova, B.; Simes, J.; Collins, R.; Kirby, A.; Colhoun, H.; et al. Efficacy and safety of LDL-lowering therapy among men and women: Meta-analysis of individual data from 174,000 participants in 27 randomised trials. Lancet 2015, 385, 1397–1405. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Tan, M.; Song, X.; Zhang, G.; Peng, A.; Li, X.; Li, M.; Liu, Y.; Wang, C. Statins and the risk of lung cancer: A meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013, 8, e57349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kuoppala, J.; Lamminpää, A.; Pukkala, E. Statins and cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Cancer 2008, 44, 2122–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Goldstein, J.L.; Brown, M.S. Regulation of the mevalonate pathway. Nature 1990, 343, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Rando, R.R. Chemical biology of isoprenylation/methylation. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1996, 24, 682–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Casey, P.J. Protein lipidation in cell signaling. Science 1995, 268, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jang, H.J.; Hong, E.M.; Park, S.W.; Byun, H.W.; Koh, D.H.; Choi, M.H.; Kae, S.H.; Lee, J. Statin induces apoptosis of human colon cancer cells and downregulation of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor via proapoptotic ERK activation. Oncol. Lett. 2016, 12, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Müller, C.; Bockhorn, A.G.; Klusmeier, S.; Kiehl, M.; Roeder, C.; Kalthoff, H.; Koch, O.M. Lovastatin inhibits proliferation of pancreatic cancer cell lines with mutant as well as with wild-type K-ras oncogene but has different effects on protein phosphorylation and induction of apoptosis. Int. J. Oncol. 1998, 12, 717–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lee, J.; Hong, E.M.; Jang, J.A.; Park, S.W.; Koh, D.H.; Choi, M.H.; Jang, H.J.; Kae, S.H. Simvastatin induces apoptosis and suppresses insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor in bile duct cancer cells. Gut Liver 2016, 10, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kozar, K.; Kaminski, R.; Legat, M.; Kopec, M.; Nowis, D.; Skierski, J.S.; Koronkiewicz, M.; Jakóbisiak, M.; Golab, J. Cerivastatin demonstrates enhanced antitumor activity against human breast cancer cell lines when used in combination with doxorubicin or cisplatin. Int. J. Oncol. 2004, 24, 1149–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Khanzada, U.K.; Pardo, O.E.; Meier, C.; Downward, J.; Seckl, M.J.; Arcaro, A. Potent inhibition of small-cell lung cancer cell growth by simvastatin reveals selective functions of Ras isoforms in growth factor signalling. Oncogene 2006, 25, 877–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhong, S.; Zhang, X.; Chen, L.; Ma, T.; Tang, J.; Zhao, J. Statin use and mortality in cancer patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2015, 41, 554–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Alexandre, L.; Clark, A.B.; Bhutta, H.Y.; Chan, S.S.; Lewis, M.P.; Hart, A.R. Association between statin use after diagnosis of esophageal cancer and survival: A population-based cohort study. Gastroenterology 2016, 150, 854–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Cardwell, C.R.; Hicks, B.M.; Hughes, C.; Murray, L.J. Statin use after colorectal cancer diagnosis and survival: A population-based cohort study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 32, 3177–3183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Cardwell, C.R.; Mc Menamin, Ú.; Hughes, C.M.; Murray, L.J. Statin use and survival from lung cancer: A population-based cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2015, 24, 833–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Manthravadi, S.; Shrestha, A.; Madhusudhana, S. Impact of statin use on cancer recurrence and mortality in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Cancer 2016, 139, 1281–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Meng, Y.; Liao, Y.B.; Xu, P.; Wei, W.R.; Wang, J. Statin use and mortality of patients with prostate cancer: A meta-analysis. Onco. Targets Ther. 2016, 9, 1689–1696. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Holstein, S.A.; Hohl, R.J. Synergistic interaction of lovastatin and paclitaxel in human cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2001, 1, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Agarwal, B.; Bhendwal, S.; Halmos, B.; Moss, S.; Ramey, W.G.; Holt, P.R. Lovastatin augments apoptosis induced by chemotherapeutic agents in colon cancer cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 1999, 5, 2223–2229. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, J.; Lan, T.; Hou, J.; Zhang, J.; An, Y.; Tie, L.; Pan, Y.; Liu, J.; Li, X. Atorvastatin sensitizes human non-small cell lung carcinomas to carboplatin via suppression of AKT activation and upregulation of TIMP-1. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2012, 44, 759–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Park, I.H.; Kim, J.Y.; Choi, J.Y.; Han, J.Y. Simvastatin enhances irinotecan-induced apoptosis in human non-small cell lung cancer cells by inhibition of proteasome activity. Invest. New Drugs 2011, 29, 883–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bocci, G.; Fioravanti, A.; Orlandi, P.; Bernardini, N.; Collecchi, P.; Del Tacca, M.; Danesi, R. Fluvastatin synergistically enhances the antiproliferative effect of gemcitabine in human pancreatic cancer MIAPaCa-2 cells. Br. J. Cancer 2005, 93, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Park, I.H.; Kim, J.Y.; Jung, J.I.; Han, J.Y. Lovastatin overcomes gefitinib resistance in human non-small cell lung cancer cells with K-Ras mutations. Invest. New Drugs 2010, 28, 791–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lee, J.; Jung, K.H.; Park, Y.S.; Ahn, J.B.; Shin, S.J.; Im, S.A.; Oh, D.Y.; Shin, D.B.; Kim, T.W.; Lee, N.; et al. Simvastatin plus irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal patients: A multicenter phase II study. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2009, 64, 657–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kawata, S.; Yamasaki, E.; Nagase, T.; Inui, Y.; Ito, N.; Matsuda, Y.; Inada, M.; Tamura, S.; Noda, S.; Imai, Y.; Matsuzawa, Y. Effect of pravastatin on survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. A randomized controlled trial. Br. J. Cancer 2001, 84, 886–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Konings, I.R.; van der Gaast, A.; van der Wijk, L.J.; de Jongh, F.E.; Eskens, F.A.; Sleijfer, S. The addition of pravastatin to chemotherapy in advanced gastric carcinoma: a randomised phase II trial. Eur. J. Cancer 2010, 46, 3200–3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Han., J.Y.; Lee, S.H.; Yoo, N.J.; Hyung, L.S.; Moon, Y.J.; Yun, T.; Kim, H.T.; Lee, J.S. A randomized phase II study of gefitinib plus simvastatin versus gefitinib alone in previously treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 1553–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kim, S.T.; Kang, J.H.; Lee, J.; Park, S.H.; Park, J.O.; Park, Y.S.; Lim, H.Y.; Hwang, I.G.; Lee, S.C.; Park, K.W.; et al. Simvastatin plus capecitabine-cisplatin versus placebo plus capecitabine-cisplatin in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer: A double-blind randomised phase 3 study. Eur. J. Cancer 2014, 50, 2822–2830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hong, J.Y.; Nam, E.M.; Lee, J.; Park, J.O.; Lee, S.C.; Song, S.Y.; Choi, S.H.; Heo, J.S.; Park, S.H.; Lim, H.Y.; et al. Randomized double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase II trial of simvastatin and gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2014, 73, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lim, S.H.; Kim, T.W.; Hong, Y.S.; Han, S.W.; Lee, K.H.; Kang, H.J.; Hwang, I.G.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, S.T.; et al. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled multi-centre phase III trial of XELIRI/FOLFIRI plus simvastatin for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2015, 113, 1421–1426. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
  36. Seckl, M.J.; Ottensmeier, C.H.; Cullen, M.; Schmid, P.; Ngai, Y.; Muthukumar, D.; Thompson, J.; Harden, S.; Middleton, G.; Fife, K.M.; et al. Multicenter, phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pravastatin added to first-line standard chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer (LUNGSTAR). J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 35, 1506–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lee, Y.; Lee, K.H.; Lee, G.K.; Lee, S.H.; Lim, K.Y.; Joo, J.; Go, Y.J.; Lee, J.S.; Han, J.Y. Randomized phase II study of afatinib plus simvastatin versus afatinib alone in previously treated patients with advanced nonadenocarcinomatous non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. Treat. 2017, 49, 1001–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G.; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009, 339, b2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Panic, N.; Leoncini, E.; de Belvis, G.; Ricciardi, W.; Boccia, S. Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses. PLoS One 2013, 8, e83138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wald, N.J.; Bestwick, J.P. Presentation of meta-analysis plots. J. Med. Screen 2015, 22, 49–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Sterne, J.A.; Sutton, A.J.; Ioannidis, J.P.; Terrin, N.; Jones, D.R.; Lau, J.; Carpenter, J.; Rücker, G.; Harbord, R.M.; Schmid, C.H.; et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2011, 343, d4002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Eagger, M.; Davey Smith, G.; Schneider, M.; Minder, C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple graphical test. BMJ 1997, 315, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jadad, A.R.; Moore, R.A.; Carroll, D.; Jenkinson, C.; Reynolds, D.J.; Gavaghan, D.J.; McQuay, H.J. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Control Clin. Trials 1996, 17, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sanli, T.; Liu, C.; Rashid, A.; Hopmans, S.N.; Tsiani, E.; Schultz, C.; Farrell, T.; Singh, G.; Wright, J.; Tsakiridis, T. Lovastatin sensitizes lung cancer cells to ionizing radiation: modulation of molecular pathways of radioresistance and tumor suppression. J. Thorac Oncol. 2011, 6, 439–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Demierre, M.F.; Higgins, P.D.; Gruber, S.B.; Hawk, E.; Lippman, S.M. Statins and cancer prevention. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2005, 5, 930–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chan, K.K.; Oza, A.M.; Siu, L.L. The statins as anticancer agents. Clin. Cancer Res. 2003, 9, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Han, J.Y.; Lim, K.Y.; Yu, S.Y.; Yun, T.; Kim, H.T.; Lee, J.S. A phase 2 study of irinotecan, cisplatin, and simvastatin for untreated extensive-disease small cell lung cancer. Cancer 2011, 117, 2178–2185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Fiala, O.; Pesek, M.; Finek, J.; Minarik, M.; Benesova, L.; Bortlicek, Z.; Topolcan, O. Statins augment efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer harbouring KRAS mutation. Tumour Biol. 2015, 36, 5801–5805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Emberson, J.R.; Kearney, P.M.; Blackwell, L.; Newman, C.; Reith, C.; Bhala, N.; Holland, L.; Peto, R.; Keech, A.; Collins, R.; et al. Lack of effect of lowering LDL cholesterol on cancer: meta-analysis of individual data from 175,000 people in 27 randomised trials of statin therapy. PLoS One 2012, 7, e29849. [Google Scholar]
  50. Suissa S, Azoulay L. Metformin and the risk of cancer: time-related biases in observational studies. Diabetes Care 2012, 35, 2665–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Guo, D.; Reinitz, F.; Youssef, M.; Hong, C.; Nathanson, D.; Akhavan, D.; Kuga, D.; Amzajerdi, A.N.; Soto, H.; Zhu, S.; et al. An LXR agonist promotes glioblastoma cell death through inhibition of an EGFR/AKT/SREBP-1/LDLR-dependent pathway. Cancer Discov. 2011, 1, 442–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lee, J.; Lee, I.; Han, B.; Park, J.O.; Jang, J.; Park, C.; Kang, W.K. Effect of simvastatin on cetuximab resistance in human colorectal cancer with KRAS mutations. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2011, 103, 674–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Larner, J.; Jane, J.; Laws, E.; Packer, R.; Myers, C.; Shaffrey, M. A phase I-II trial of lovastatin for anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma multiforme. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 1998, 21, 579–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Thibault, A.; Samid, D.; Tompkins, A.C.; Figg, W.D.; Cooper, M.R.; Hohl, R.J.; Trepel, J.; Liang, B.; Patronas, N.; Venzon, D.J.; et al. Phase I study of lovastatin, an inhibitor of the mevalonate pathway, in patients with cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 1996, 2, 483–491. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Krens, L.L.; Baas, J.M.; Gelderblom, H.; Guchelaar, H.J. Therapeutic modulation of k-ras signaling in colorectal cancer. Drug Discov. Today 2010, 15, 502–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Krens, L.L.; Simkens, L.H.; Baas, J.M.; Koomen, E.R.; Gelderblom, H.; Punt, C.J.; Guchelaar, H.J. Statin use is not associated with improved progression free survival in cetuximab treated KRAS mutant metastatic colorectal cancer patients: Results from the CAIRO2 study. PLoS One 2014, 9, e112201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Voorneveld, P.W.; Reimers, M.S.; Bastiaannet, E.; Jacobs, R.J.; van Eijk, R.; Zanders, M.M.J.; Herings, R.M.C.; van Herk-Sukel, M.P.P.; Kodach, L.L.; van Wezel, T.; et al. Statin use after diagnosis of colon cancer and patient survival. Gastroenterology 2017, 153, 470–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jcm 07 00325 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow diagram of search process.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of search process.
Jcm 07 00325 g001
Jcm 07 00325 g002 550
Figure 2. Forest plots for grade 3–5 adverse events (A) and overall response rate (B).
Figure 2. Forest plots for grade 3–5 adverse events (A) and overall response rate (B).
Jcm 07 00325 g002
Jcm 07 00325 g003 550
Figure 3. Forest plots for progression-free survival (A) and overall survival (B).
Figure 3. Forest plots for progression-free survival (A) and overall survival (B).
Jcm 07 00325 g003
Jcm 07 00325 g004 550
Figure 4. Funnel plots for publication bias: overall response rate (A); progression-free survival (B); overall survival (C).
Figure 4. Funnel plots for publication bias: overall response rate (A); progression-free survival (B); overall survival (C).
Jcm 07 00325 g004
Table
Table 1. Eight randomized, controlled trials of systemic anticancer therapy with or without statin in human cancer.
Table 1. Eight randomized, controlled trials of systemic anticancer therapy with or without statin in human cancer.
First Author, (Year) [Ref.]Cancer TypePhaseSettingTreatment ArmNo. of PatientsPrimary EndpointORRAny Gr 3–5AEsmPFS (Month)mOS(Month)Jadad Score
Kawata (2001) [30]HCCII1stTAE + oral 5-FU + pravastatin 40 mg41OSNANANA183
TAE + oral 5-FU42 NANANA9
Konings (2010) [31]GCII1stEpirubicin/cisplatin/capecitabine + pravastatin 40 mg15PFS33.3%8 (53.3%) *682
Epirubicin/cisplatin/capecitabine15 46.7%7 (46.7%) *56
Han (2011) [32]NSCLCIII2nd or 3rdGefitinib 250 mg + simvastain 40 mg52ORR38.5%2 (4%)3.313.63
Gefitinib 250 mg54 31.5%1 (2%)1.912
Kim (2014) [33]GCIII1stCapecitabine/cisplatin + simvastatin 40 mg120PFS27.5%63 (52.5%)5.211.65
Capecitabine/cisplatin + placebo124 29.0%70 (56.4%)4.611.5
Hong (2014) [34]PCII1stGemcitabine + simvastatin 40 mg58PFS6.9%11 (18.9%)2.46.35
Gemcitabine + placebo56 14.3%5 (9%)3.68.7
Lim (2015) [35]CRCIII2ndXELIRI or FOLFIRI + simvastatin 40mg134PFS11.9%65 (48.5%)5.915.35
XELIRI or FOLFIRI + placebo135 11.8%62 (45.9%)7.019.2
Seckl (2017) [36]SCLCIII1stEtoposide/platinum +/− RT + pravastatin 40 mg422OS69.0%333 (81.2%)7.710.75
Etoposide/platinum +/− RT + placebo424 69.1%333 (81.4%)7.310.6
Lee (2017) [37]Non-ADC NSCLCII2nd or 3rdAfatinib + simvastatin 40 mg36ORR5.7%2 (5.6%) ‡1.0103
Afatinib32 9.4%6 (16.8%) ‡3.67
HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; GC, gastric cancer; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; PC, pancreatic cancer; CRC, colorectal cancer; SCLC, small-cell lung cancer, non-ADC, non-adenocarcinoma; TAE, transcatheter arterial embolization; 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; XELIRI, capecitabine + irinotecan; FOLFIRI, 5-FU + leucovorin + irinotecan; RT, radiotherapy; AEs, adverse events; ORR, overall response rate; mOS, median overall survival; mPFS, median progression-free survival; OR, odds ratio; HR, hazard ratio; NA, not available. CI, confidence interval; * neutropenia, ‡ diarrhea.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jang, H.J.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, J. The Effect of Statin Added to Systemic Anticancer Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 325. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7100325

AMA Style

Jang HJ, Kim HS, Kim JH, Lee J. The Effect of Statin Added to Systemic Anticancer Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2018; 7(10):325. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7100325

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jang, Hyun Joo, Hyeong Su Kim, Jung Han Kim, and Jin Lee. 2018. "The Effect of Statin Added to Systemic Anticancer Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials" Journal of Clinical Medicine 7, no. 10: 325. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7100325

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop