Next Article in Journal
1,4-Naphthoquinone (CNN1) Induces Apoptosis through DNA Damage and Promotes Upregulation of H2AFX in Leukemia Multidrug Resistant Cell Line
Next Article in Special Issue
Regulation of Autophagy Machinery in Magnaporthe oryzae
Previous Article in Journal
Halochromic Behavior and Anticancer Effect of New Synthetic Anthocyanidins Complexed with β-Cyclodextrin Derivatives
Previous Article in Special Issue
MoWhi2 Mediates Mitophagy to Regulate Conidiation and Pathogenesis in Magnaporthe oryzae
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The LAMMER Kinase MoKns1 Regulates Growth, Conidiation and Pathogenicity in Magnaporthe oryzae

1
State Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Treats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-Products, Institute of Plant Protection and Microbiology, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China
2
Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Biometrology and Inspection & Quarantine, College of Life Sciences, Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
3
College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, China
4
State Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Treats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-Products, Institute of Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(15), 8104; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158104
Submission received: 9 May 2022 / Revised: 13 July 2022 / Accepted: 19 July 2022 / Published: 22 July 2022

Abstract

:
Magnaporthe oryzae is an important pathogen that causes a devastating disease in rice. It has been reported that the dual-specificity LAMMER kinase is conserved from yeast to animal species and has a variety of functions. However, the functions of the LAMMER kinase have not been reported in M. oryzae. In this study, we identified the unique LAMMER kinase MoKns1 and analyzed its function in M. oryzae. We found that in a MoKNS1 deletion mutant, growth and conidiation were primarily decreased, and pathogenicity was almost completely lost. Furthermore, our results found that MoKns1 is involved in autophagy. The ΔMokns1 mutant was sensitive to rapamycin, and MoKns1 interacted with the autophagy-related protein MoAtg18. Compared with the wild-type strain 70−15, autophagy was significantly enhanced in the ΔMokns1 mutant. In addition, we also found that MoKns1 regulated DNA damage stress pathways, and the ΔMokns1 mutant was more sensitive to hydroxyurea (HU) and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) compared to the wild-type strain 70−15. The expression of genes related to DNA damage stress pathways in the ΔMokns1 mutant was significantly different from that in the wild-type strain. Our results demonstrate that MoKns1 is an important pathogenic factor in M. oryzae involved in regulating autophagy and DNA damage response pathways, thus affecting virulence. This research on M. oryzae pathogenesis lays a foundation for the prevention and control of M. oryzae.

1. Introduction

Magnaporthe oryzae is the causal agent of rice blast, a devastating disease affecting rice plants worldwide [1]. The rice blast fungus M. oryzae has become an important model fungus for studying the development of pathogenicity and microbe−plant interactions of pathomycete. The appressorium of M. oryzae is a special structure produced by conidia germ tubes or hyphal tips. The formation and development of the appressorium is crucial for plant surface penetration [2]. Many signaling or protein transport pathways, including protein kinases, DNA damage response and autophagy, are important for conidia germination, appressorium penetration and the extension of invasive hyphae of M. oryzae during the infection process [3,4,5].
Kinases capable of phosphorylating all three amino acid residues (serine/threonine/tyrosine) are called as dual-specificity kinases [6]. LAMMER kinases contain a conserved motif, ‘EHLAMMERILG’, in the subdomain X of the kinase catalytic domain [7]. LAMMER kinases are dual-specificity kinases. KNS1 exhibits 36% identity to the CDC2 gene product of Schizosaccharomyces pombe and 34% identity to the CDC28 gene product of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In yeast, it was initially thought that the KNS1 gene is not essential for cell growth and a variety of other cellular processes [8]. Additional functions of LAMMER proteins have been discovered. In S. cerevisiae, the LAMMER kinase Kns1 is involved in filamentous growth and in the TOR signaling pathway [9]. In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the LAMMER kinase Lkh1 is involved in filamentous growth, asexual flocculation, the oxidative stress response by regulating the expression of antioxidant genes and the regulation of Tup transcriptional repressors [10,11,12,13]. In Drosophila, the LAMMER kinase DOA plays a role in cell structure maintenance, differentiation and sex determination [14]. In Aspergillus nidulans, the LAMMER kinase Lkh1A affects vegetative growth, asexual and sexual development, and cell wall biogenesis [15,16]. In Candida albicans, the LAMMER kinase Kns1 is involved in dimorphic transition, cell wall integrity, response to DNA replicative stress and adherence to the host cell surface [17].
Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved intracellular waste treatment and recycling process. In filamentous fungi, autophagy plays an extremely important function. In our previous research, we obtained the ΔMoatg1–10, ΔMoatg12, ΔMoatg14–ΔMoatg16 and ΔMoatg18 mutants, which completely lack pathogenicity [18]. The TOR kinase complex is an evolutionarily conserved protein kinase coordinating nutrients and energy in the regulation of cell proliferation, cell cycle, cell wall integrity and cell metabolic activities by interacting with different subunits [19]. In M. oryzae, it has been confirmed that TOR signaling functions in controlling the appressorium formation. TOR pathways are involved in modulating autophagy in coordination with the AMP-activated protein kinase ABL1 [5]. The vacuolar protein Imp1 maintains the integrity of the biotrophic interface membrane and promotes invasive hyphal growth by TOR [20]. The VASt domain-containing protein MoVast1 acts as a novel autophagy inhibition factor that modulates the activity of MoTOR [21].
The function of Kns1 proteins in filamentous fungi remains unknown. To investigate the cellular function of LAMMER kinase Kns1 in M. oryzae, we cloned KNS1, a homolog of S. cerevisiae KNS1. Deletion of KNS1 resulted in defects in pathogenicity of the rice blast fungus. Additionally, Kns1 was necessary for the expression of genes involved in the DNA damage response. Furthermore, deletion of MoKNS1 affected TOR activity and autophagy. We propose that MoKns1 in M. oryzae is important for its pathogenicity, partly through regulating autophagy and the DNA damage pathway for invasion.

2. Results

2.1. MoKns1 Is a Homolog of Kns1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

We used the Kns1 peptide sequence from budding yeast as the query in a BlastP search within the M. oryzae genome database in EnsembIFungi (http://fungi.ensembl.org/Magnaporthe_oryzae/Info/Index) (accessed on 20 July 2018). We identified a Kns1 homolog (MGG_16904) that shared 51% amino acid similarity with Kns1, which we named MoKns1. MoKns1 showed high homology with its orthologues in other fungi (Figure 1), including FgKNS1 of Fusarium graminearum (53% identity), CoKNS1 of Colletotrium orbiculare (67% identity), HsKNS1 of Homo sapiens (53% identity), MmKNS1 of Mus musculus (46% identity), NcKNS1 of Neurospora crassa (58% identity). MoKns1 encodes a LAMMER kinase comprising 704 amino acids, which contains a conserved LAMMER motif. Our results revealed that Kns1 is well conserved across various organisms including yeast, filamentous fungi, plants, mammals and Homo sapiens (Figure 1).

2.2. MoKns1 Is Required for Conidiation and Virulence

To investigate the role of MoKns1 in M. oryzae, a single mutant of KNS1 was constructed by ATMT. The MoKNS1 gene deletion was confirmed by PCR and relative expression levels analysis (Figure S1A–C). The complemented transformant strain ΔMokns1–C was generated by transforming the ΔMokns1 mutant with a genetic construct containing MoKNS1 fused to green fluorescent protein (MoKNS1–GFP), as shown in Figure S1D. To investigate the biological roles of MoKns1 in M. oryzae, vegetative growth, conidiation and pathogenicity were assayed by comparison to the wild-type 70−15 strain, the ∆Mokns1 mutant and the complementation strain ∆Mokns1–C. As shown in Figure 2A,B, the ∆Mokns1 strain grew more slowly than the wild-type 70−15 and ∆Mokns1–C strains on complete medium (CM) plates during 9 days of incubation. The mycelial morphology of the wild-type 70−15 strain and the ∆Mokns1 mutant was not much different (Figure S2B). In addition, the ∆Mokns1 mutant produced almost no conidia (Figure 2C), as indicated also by the conidiophore morphology (Figure S2A). To examine the effect of MoKNS1 on virulence, we inoculated mycelial plugs onto barley leaves and found that lesions caused by the ΔMokns1 mutant hardly spread (Figure 2A). The rice spray experiment could not be completed because almost no conidia were produced by the ∆Mokns1 mutant. These data demonstrated that MoKNS1 plays vital roles in conidiation and pathogenicity in M. oryzae.
Unlike other higher eukaryotes, which have several isoforms of LAMMER kinase, M. oryzae has only one LAMMER kinase ortholog. Kns1 contains a so-called LAMMER motif, EHLAMMEAVVD, within the subdomain X of the kinase catalytic domain [10]. Considering the domains of MoKns1, we artificially divided MoKns1 into three segments, the first segment included a Disordered region (1–131 aa), the second segment included a second Disordered region (151–272 aa), and the third segment included the LAMMER protein kinase domain (332–670 aa) (Figure 2D). The three segments were complemented into the ΔMokns1 mutant to obtain ΔMokns1–CN1, ΔMokns1–CN2, ΔMokns1–CN3, respectively. We found that the growth and conidiation of the three segment-supplemented strains could not be restored by supplementing any single segment, and their growth and conidiation were almost the same as those of the ΔMokns1 mutant. The pathogenicity of the three segment-supplemented strains was still very high and basically was recovered to its initial levels (Figure 2A–C). Then, two segments were complemented into the ΔMokns1 mutant to obtain ΔMokns1–CN1+N2, ΔMokns1–CN2+N3, ΔMokns1–CN1+N3. The growth and conidiation of any of the two-segment-supplemented strains could not be restored, and the growth and conidiation were almost the same as those of the ΔMokns1 mutant. The pathogenicity of any of the two-segment-supplemented strains was still very high and basically was recovered to its initial levels (Figure 2A–C). These results indicated that the growth and conidiation of MoKns1 required all amino acid sequences, but any isolated sequence affected the pathogenicity of M. oryzae.

2.3. MoKns1 Is Required for the Response to DNA Replicative Stress

To elucidate the cellular functions of MoKns1 in M. oryzae, the response of the ΔMokns1 mutants to several stresses was investigated. All ΔMokns1 mutants showed sensitivity to MMS- and HU-caused DNA replicative stress during the S-phase (Figure 3A–D). Under DNA replicative stress, both fission and budding yeast activate the expression of specific genes for DNA repair and cell cycle control [17]. We homologously aligned the genes in yeast and examined the expression levels of MoMSH2 (encoding a DNA mis-match repair factor), DNA damage checkpoint genes (MoRAD17, MoCDS1, MoCHK1), Mitotic exit (MoCDC14, MoCDC15, MoDBF2, MoNUD1, MoMOB1, MoCDC5, MoTEM1), anaphase-promoting complex genes (MoAPC3, MoAPC1, MoCDC20) by qRT−PCR. The ΔMokns1 strain showed obviously increased expression levels of MoMSH2, mitotic exit genes (MoCDC14, MoCDC15, MoDBF2, MoNUD1, MoMOB1, MoCDC5, MoTEM1) and anaphase-promoting complex genes (MoAPC3, MoAPC1, MoCDC20). However, the expression levels of the DNA damage checkpoint genes (MoRAD17, MoCDS1, MoCHK1) in the ΔMokns1 mutant were significantly lower than those in the wild-type 70−15 strain (Figure 3E). These results suggest that MoKns1 plays a role in the transcriptional regulation of DNA replicative relative genes and is required for the response to DNA replicative stress.

2.4. MoKns1 Interacts with MoAtg18 and Is Involved in Autophagy

To understand the mechanism of action of MoKns1, a yeast two-hybrid screening assay was conducted with an M. oryzae cDNA library. MoAtg18 was identified as a candidate that interacted with MoKns1. First, the interaction between full-length MoKns1 and MoAtg18 was not detected by the two-hybrid assay. Since MoKns1–N3 contains a LAMMER motif, we examined the interaction between MoKns1–N3 and MoAtg18. As shown in Figure 4A, Kns1–N3 interacted with MoAtg18. Subsequently, we examined whether MoKns1–N1 and MoKns1–N2 interacted with Atg18. We found that MoKns1–N2 interacted with MoAtg18 (Figure 5A), but the interaction between MoKns1–N1 and Atg18 was not detected. To further confirm the authenticity of the interaction, we used pull-down experiments to verify the interaction between MoKns1–N2, MoKns1–N3 and MoAtg18 (Figure 4B and Figure 5B). Our results showed that MoKns1–N2 and MoKns1–N3 interacted with MoAtg18.
Autophagy is emerging as an important process for virulence of pathogenic fungi [22]. TOR is a critical modulator of the autophagy process [5]. To test whether MoKns1 regulates the activity of MoTor, the relationship between MoKns1 and MoTor kinase was verified after treatment with rapamycin, a specific inhibitor of the Tor kinase. Compared with the wild type 70−15 strain, the ΔMokns1 mutant was more sensitive to rapamycin (Figure 6A,B). To examine whether the autophagy process in the ΔMokns1 mutant was impaired, we tagged MoAtg8 at its N-terminal with GFP on the chromosomes in the wild-type and ΔMokns1 M. oryzae mutant to monitor localization and degradation of GFP−MoAtg8 by western blot. These strains were starved in the SD−N medium for different durations. The delivery of GFP−MoAtg8 to the vacuoles in ΔMokns1 mutant was significantly increased (2 h: 47%, 4 h: 52% vacuoles with GFP fluorescence) (Figure 6C,D). These results suggest that the degradation of GFP−MoAtg8 was accelerated in the ΔMokns1 mutant. Then, the autophagy flux was detected in the wild-type 70−15 strain and the ΔMokns1 mutant. In the presence of nutrients, autophagy was more intense, and a more intense MoAtg8−PE (autophagy marker to monitor autophagy flux) band was found in the ΔMokns1 mutant (Figure 6E). We concluded that MoKns1 is involved in autophagy in M. oryzae. M. oryzae contains many ATG genes. These ATG genes, i.e., Atg1–9, 11–18, 20, 22, 22–24, 26–29, affect the pathogenicity of M. oryzae [18,21,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Transcription analysis of these genes was performed by qRT−PCR. Only the three genes MoATG4, MoATG14, MoATG29 showed lower expression, and the expression of MoATG29 gene was significantly downregulated in the ΔMokns1 mutant. The expression levels of other ATG genes were all upregulated, and the MoATG2, MoATG5, MoATG6, MoATG11, MoATG15, MoATG17, MoATG22, MoATG2 genes were significantly upregulated (Figure 7).

3. Discussion

Magnaporthe oryzae causes rice blast disease via a penetration peg that is produced by the appressorium and its expansive growth across cells [29]. These invasion processes are regulated by a variety of signal pathways. Protein kinases play important roles in many living activities. Studies have shown that many protein kinases affect the pathogenicity of M. oryzae [30]. KNS1 is distantly related to members of the CDC28/cdc2 gene family [8]. LAMMER kinase was found to be very conserved and has autophosphorylation activity [31]. In yeast, TOR regulates ribosome and tRNA synthesis via the LAMMER kinase [9]. However, there is little research on the functions of Kns1 proteins in filamentous fungi. In order to explore the function of Kns1 in rice blast, we deleted the MoKNS1 gene in the wild-type strain 70−15 and systematically analyzed the effects of this deletion on the growth, development and pathogenicity of M. oryzae. In this work, we characterized MoKns1 in M. oryzae and showed that it is required for fungal development and plant pathogenicity. We discovered that MoKNS1 is involved in autophagy and interacts with Atg18, which was discovered in the rice blast fungus. Additionally, we also found that MoKNS1 participates in maintaining DNA replication and regulates TOR activity. To the best of our knowledge, these results have not been reported for other species and will help us better understand the various functions of Kns1 protein in plant pathogenic fungi.
Autophagy is an essential, conserved self-eating process that cells perform to allow the degradation of intracellular components. The complete process of autophagy consists of three steps: induction, autophagosome formation and autophagosome−lysosome fusion and degradation [32]. The pathogenicity of M. oryzae was seriously affected by the deletion of autophagy-related genes. In yeast, Atg18 localizes to both the preautophagosomal structure (PAS) and to punctate structures at the vacuolar membrane [33]. Vacuolar localization of Atg18 is also dependent on the transmembrane protein Vac7 [34]. PAS-localized Atg18 is involved in the localization of the autophagy proteins Atg2 and Atg9. Atg18 is essential for vesicle formation in both autophagy and the cytoplasm-to-vacuole targeting (Cvt) pathway. The atg18 mutant affects the autophagy process [33]. In M. oryzae, the pathogenicity of the ΔMoatg18 mutant was completely lost, and autophagy was blocked. The evolutionarily conserved protein kinase Tor (mechanistic target of rapamycin) is a crucial cell growth and autophagy regulator that integrates nutritional cues [19]. It has been reported that excessive stimulation of autophagy through constant inhibition of MoTor activity hinders host plant infection by M. oryzae [35]. Therefore, the precise regulation of MoTor activity may be responsible for the modulation of autophagy. In our study, the ΔMokns1 mutant was more sensitive to rapamycin. We inferred that MoKns1 might act as a novel autophagy inhibition factor to repress autophagy by regulating MoTor activity.
DNA replication is the biological process that produces two identical DNA replicas from one original DNA molecule. DNA replication occurs in all living organisms and is the most important process in biological inheritance. In M. oryzae, proteins involved in DNA replication are also important for development. Early appressorium development requires the nucleus in the germinating conidial cell to undergo DNA replication. In ΔbimE mutants, arrested cell cycle progression results in loss of pathogenicity, suggesting that mitosis is required for fungal infection [36]. In M. oryzae, the MoCds1 kinase is an S-phase checkpoint of the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway. Control of DNA replication and modulation of turgor are necessary for infecting plant cells [37]. In our study, we found a significant difference in the expression of DNA synthesis- and mitosis-related genes and higher sensitivity to the DNA synthetic inhibitors HU and MMS in the ΔMokns1 mutant.
In summary, we demonstrated that MoKns1 is involved in autophagy and characterized its biological functions. MoKns1 plays a crucial role in hyphal growth, conidiation, invasive growth and pathogenicity in M. oryzae. In addition, the ΔMokns1 mutant appeared to be sensitive to the DNA synthetic inhibitors HU and MMS. In the ΔMokns1 mutant, we found a significant difference in the expression of DNA synthesis- and mitosis-related genes. Furthermore, we provide new insights on how MoKns1 negatively regulates autophagy by interacting with MoAtg18.

4. Methods and Materials

4.1. Strains and Culture Conditions

M. oryzae strain 70–15 was used as the wild-type strain. All strains were cultured on solid CM for growth at 25 °C for 6–9 days. The mycelia were harvested from the liquid CM and used for genomic DNA and RNA extractions. Please refer to previous references for specific culture conditions [38].

4.2. Gene Deletion and Complementation and Plasmid Constructions

To construct the MoKNS1 knockout vector, the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) and the 3′ UTR of MoKNS1 were cloned with the primers KNS1–5F/5R and KNS1–3F/3R (Table S1), then ligated into the EcoRI/HindIII sites of pKO1B with a bar resistance gene. The resultant knockout vector was introduced into the wild-type strain 70−15 by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (ATMT) [39]. All the primers used in the gene deletion experiment are listed in Table S1. The obtained mutants were screened by PCR. EcoRΙ and BamHΙ were used to double slice the PKD5 vector. The complement DNA fragment that contained the entire MoKNS1 gene driven by the native promoter was amplified by PCR and ligated to GFP by using the primers KNS1-GFP-F/R. To construct plasmids expressing MoKns1–N1–AD (1–131aa), MoKns1–N2–AD (151–272aa), MoKns1–N3–AD (332–670aa), MoKns1–BD, we used the related cDNA fragments from the M. oryzae cDNA. To construct the plasmids used in the pull-down experiments, we cleaved the pGEX4T−1 vector using the restriction enzyme EcoRΙ, then the coding sequence of MoKns1–N2 was amplified with KNS1–N2–GST–F/R primers. The GST–MoKNS1–N2 vector was obtained by homologous recombination linking the amplified MoKns1–N2 fragment with the cut pGEX4T–1 vector. The His−MoAtg18 vector was obtained by homologous recombination linking the amplified His−MoAtg18 fragment with the cut pET21a vector (HindIII).
MoAtg18 was thus fused with GST and His. All constructs were generated via homologous recombination (pEASY−Basic Seamless Cloning and Assembly Kit; Transgen Biotech, Beijing, China).

4.3. Pathogenicity Assay

Mycelial plugs of the 70−15, ΔMokns1 and ΔMokns1–C strains were inoculated on detached barley, placed in an incubator at a temperature of 25 °C with a light/dark cycle of 16/8 h for 4 days.

4.4. Quantification of Gene Expression by qRT−PCR

Total RNA samples were extracted from the mycelia using the PureLinkTM RNA mini kit (Vazyme) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The reverse transcriptase HiScript III RT SuperMix for qPCR (Vazyme) was used to prepare cDNA. qRT−PCR was run on a Lightcycler96 (Roche) Real−time PCR System with chamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme). The 2ΔΔCT method was used to calculate the relative quantity of each transcript using the M. oryzae actin gene as the internal control. The experiment was repeated three times with three biological replicates. The primers used are listed in Table S1.

4.5. Autophagy Assays

The strains targeted with GFP−MoAtg8 were inoculated in liquid CM medium at 25 °C for 36 h, then shifted to SD−N medium for 2 h and 4 h to induce autophagy. Mycelium treated with the MM−N medium was assessed for the degradation of GFP−MoAtg8 by immunoblotting assays with anti-GFP (rabbit; 1:10,000; Abcam, UK) and anti-GAPDH antibodies (rabbit; 1:5000; Huaan). For the MoAtg8 and the MoAtg8−PE turnover assays, the MoAtg8 and the MoAtg8−PE bands were detected using an anti-Atg8 antibody (1:2000, BML) with 13.5% SDS−PAGE.

4.6. Sensitivity Test to Chemical Agents and Physical Stresses

For the stress assays, mycelial blocks were inoculated on the CM medium with 0.02% MMS, 20 mM HU, 100 ng/mL Rapamycin at 25 °C and photographed at day 8. Please refer to the previous references for the specific experimental steps [35].

4.7. Yeast Library Screen and Yeast Two-Hybrid Assay

A yeast library screen was conducted according to the yeast screening library manual of Clontech company. The target decoy gene fragment MoKNS1 was inserted into thepGBKT7 vector, transferred into E. coli and expanded to extract the MoKns1–AD plasmid. Competent yeast cells were prepared according to the experimental operation manual (Clontech, San Francisco, CA, USA). After adding MoKns1–AD and cDNA−BD library plasmids of M. oryzae into the yeast competent cells, we spread them on SD–Ade–Leu–Trp medium for 3–5 days. Then, yeast single spots were selected for PCR verification, and the PCR products were sequentially examined by YouKang Biological Company.
Y2H assays were performed using the Matchmaker Yeast Two-Hybrid System (Clontech) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNA of MoKns1–N1, MoKns1–N2, MoKns1–N3, MoAtg18 was cloned into the AD and BD vectors. The recombinant plasmids were co-introduced into AH109 cells, and cell growth examined on SD–Leu–Trp–His–Ade and SD–Leu–Trp media. The pGADT7–T/pGBKT7–53 (AD–T/BD–53) plasmid was used as a positive control, and pGADT7/pGBKT7(AD/BD) was used as a negative control. All primers are listed in Table S1.

4.8. In Vitro Pull-Down Assays

The cDNA of MoKNS1 was cloned and inserted into the vector pGEX4T−1 to obtain the GST–MoKns1–N2 and GST–MoKns1–N3 plasmids. The full−length cDNA of MoAtg18 was fused with the vector pET21a to acquire the His−MoAtg18 plasmid. The resulting plasmid DNA was introduced into Escherichia coli strain BL21 (DE3+Plyse) cells. Then, proteins were extracted from these cells using a lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris−HCl (pH 7.5), 0.5% Triton X−100 and 0.5 mM EDTA). Whole cell lysates were analyzed by SDS−PAGE and transferring to a Coomassie blue solution for staining to confirm the expression of the resultant proteins. To ensure normal protein expression, 100 μL of glutathione agarose beads (Smart-Lifescience, Changzhou, China) was incubated with GST, GST–MoKns1–N1 or GST–MoKns1–N2 proteins at 4 °C for 2 h. Then, the cells were incubated with the bacterial lysate containing His−MoAtg18 at 4 °C for 2 h. The eluted proteins were detected by immunoblotting with anti-GST and anti-His antibodies (HUABIO, Hangzhou, China).

4.9. Determination of Conidiation

The wild type 70−15, ΔMokns1 mutant and ΔMokns1–C strains were cultured on solid CM medium at 25 °C for 8 days. The edge of colonies were selected with a hole punch, and the mycelial plugs were transferred to a CM petri dish of 9 cm; each strain was transferred to 5 petri dishes and cultured at 25 °C for 11 days. Then, 5 mL sterile water was added to each plate, the mycelium was gently scraped off with a sterilized coating stick, and then the conidia were filtered into a 50 mL centrifuge tube using three layers of filter paper. After centrifugation at 7500 rpm for 10 min, the supernatant was discarded, and the conidia were collected. Finally, the conidia were suspended again in 30 mL sterile water, and the number of conidia was counted by a blood counting plate under a microscope. Each sample was examined 6 times, and the results were recorded.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23158104/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.-M.Z. and J.-Q.W.; methodology, F.-C.L.; resources, X.-H.L.; data curation, L.L.; writing—original draft preparation, L.L.; writing—review and editing, J.-D.B.; visualization, N.C.; supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by grants (32100159 to Xueming Zhu and 31970140 to Fucheng Lin) from the National Natural Science Foundation of China and by a grant (No. 2021C2010) from the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang province to Xiaohong Liu.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article or Supplementary Material.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ebbole, D.J. Magnaporthe as a Model for Understanding Host-Pathogen Interactions. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2007, 45, 437–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kong, L.A.; Li, G.T.; Liu, Y.; Liu, M.G.; Zhang, S.J.; Yang, J.; Zhou, X.Y.; Peng, Y.L.; Xu, J.R. Differences between appressoria formed by germ tubes and appressorium-like structures developed by hyphal tips in Magnaporthe oryzae. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2013, 56, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hamer, J.E.; Talbot, N.J. Infection-related development in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 1998, 1, 693–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, X.-H.; Lin, F.-C. Investigation of the biological roles of autophagy in appressorium morphogenesis in Magnaporthe oryzae. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2008, 9, 793–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Marroquin-Guzman, M.; Sun, G.; Wilson, R.A. Glucose-ABL1-TOR Signaling Modulates Cell Cycle Tuning to Control Terminal Appressorial Cell Differentiation. PLoS Genet. 2017, 13, e1006557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lindberg, R.A.; Quinn, A.M.; Hunter, T. Dual-specificity protein kinases: Will any hydroxyl do? Trends Biochem. Sci. 1992, 17, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yun, B.; Farkas, R.; Lee, K.; Rabinow, L. The Doa locus encodes a member of a new protein kinase family and is essential for eye and embryonic development in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev. 1994, 8, 1160–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Padmanabha, R.; Gehrung, S.; Snyder, M. The KNS1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a nonessential protein kinase homologue that is distantly related to members of the CDC28/cdc2 gene family. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1991, 229, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, J.; Moir, R.D.; McIntosh, K.B.; Willis, I.M. TOR Signaling Regulates Ribosome and tRNA Synthesis via LAMMER/Clk and GSK-3 Family Kinases. Mol. Cell 2012, 45, 836–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Park, Y.-D.; Kang, W.-H.; Yang, W.-S.; Shin, K.-S.; Bae, K.S.; Park, H.-M. LAMMER kinase homolog, Lkh1, is involved in oxidative-stress response of fission yeast. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003, 311, 1078–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kang, W.-H.; Park, Y.-D.; Hwang, J.-S.; Park, H.-M. RNA-binding protein Csx1 is phosphorylated by LAMMER kinase, Lkh1, in response to oxidative stress in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 3473–3478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kang, W.-H.; Park, Y.-H.; Park, H.-M. The LAMMER Kinase Homolog, Lkh1, Regulates Tup Transcriptional Repressors through Phosphorylation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 13797–13806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Regan, H.; Scaduto, C.M.; Hirakawa, M.P.; Gunsalus, K.; Correia-Mesquita, T.O.; Sun, Y.; Chen, Y.; Kumamoto, C.A.; Bennett, R.J.; Whiteway, M. Negative regulation of filamentous growth in Candida albicansby Dig1p. Mol. Microbiol. 2017, 105, 810–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Rabinow, L.; Samson, M.-L. The role of the Drosophila LAMMER protein kinase DOA in somatic sex determination. J. Genet. 2010, 89, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kang, E.-H.; Kim, J.-A.; Oh, H.-W.; Park, H.-M. LAMMER Kinase LkhA Plays Multiple Roles in the Vegetative Growth and Asexual and Sexual Development of Aspergillus nidulans. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e58762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Choi, Y.K.; Kang, E.-H.; Park, H.-M. Role of LAMMER Kinase in Cell Wall Biogenesis during Vegetative Growth of Aspergillus nidulans. Mycobiology 2014, 42, 422–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Lim, J.-Y.; Park, Y.-H.; Pyon, Y.-H.; Yang, J.-M.; Yoon, J.-Y.; Park, S.J.; Lee, H.; Park, H.-M. The LAMMER kinase is involved in morphogenesis and response to cell wall- and DNA-damaging stresses in Candida albicans. Med. Mycol. 2020, 58, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhu, X.-M.; Li, L.; Wu, M.; Liang, S.; Shi, H.-B.; Liu, X.-H.; Lin, F.-C. Current opinions on autophagy in pathogenicity of fungi. Virulence 2019, 10, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Gonzalez, A.; Hall, M.N. Nutrient sensing and TOR signaling in yeast and mammals. EMBO J. 2017, 36, 397–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Sun, G.; Elowsky, C.; Li, G.; Wilson, R.A. TOR-autophagy branch signaling via Imp1 dictates plant-microbe biotrophic interface longevity. PLoS Genet. 2018, 14, e1007814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhu, X.-M.; Li, L.; Cai, Y.-Y.; Wu, X.-Y.; Shi, H.-B.; Liang, S.; Qu, Y.-M.; Naqvi, N.I.; Del Poeta, M.; Dong, B.; et al. A VASt-domain protein regulates autophagy, membrane tension, and sterol homeostasis in rice blast fungus. Autophagy 2021, 17, 2939–2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kershaw, M.J.; Talbot, N.J. Genome-wide functional analysis reveals that infection-associated fungal autophagy is necessary for rice blast disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 15967–15972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Liu, X.H.; Lu, J.P.; Zhang, L.; Dong, B.; Min, H.; Lin, F.C. Involvement of a Magnaporthe grisea serine/threonine kinase gene, MgATG1, in appressorium turgor and pathogenesis. Eukaryot Cell 2007, 6, 997–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Liu, T.B.; Liu, X.H.; Lu, J.P.; Zhang, L.; Min, H.; Lin, F.C. The cysteine protease MoAtg4 interacts with MoAtg8 and is required for differentiation and pathogenesis in Magnaporthe oryzae. Autophagy 2010, 6, 74–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Dong, B.; Liu, X.-H.; Lu, J.-P.; Zhang, F.-S.; Gao, H.-M.; Wang, H.-K.; Lin, F.-C. MgAtg9 trafficking in Magnaporthe oryzae. Autophagy 2009, 5, 946–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Lu, J.-P.; Liu, X.-H.; Feng, X.-X.; Min, H.; Lin, F.-C. An autophagy gene, MgATG5, is required for cell differentiation and pathogenesis in Magnaporthe oryzae. Curr. Genet. 2009, 55, 461–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, X.-H.; Zhao, Y.-H.; Zhu, X.-M.; Zeng, X.-Q.; Huang, L.-Y.; Dong, B.; Su, Z.-Z.; Wang, Y.; Lu, J.-P.; Lin, F.-C. Autophagy-related protein MoAtg14 is involved in differentiation, development and pathogenicity in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Liu, X.-H.; Yang, J.; He, R.-L.; Lu, J.-P.; Zhang, C.-L.; Lu, S.-L.; Lin, F.-C. An autophagy gene, TrATG5, affects conidiospore differentiation in Trichoderma reesei. Res. Microbiol. 2011, 162, 756–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dean, R.; Van Kan, J.A.L.; Pretorius, Z.A.; Hammond-Kosack, K.E.; Di Pietro, A.; Spanu, P.D.; Rudd, J.J.; Dickman, M.; Kahmann, R.; Ellis, J.; et al. The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012, 13, 414–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zhang, X.; Bian, Z.; Xu, J.-R. Assays for MAP Kinase Activation in Magnaporthe oryzae and Other Plant Pathogenic Fungi. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018, 1848, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, K.; Du, C.; Horn, M.; Rabinow, L. Activity and Autophosphorylation of LAMMER Protein Kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 27299–27303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Mizushima, N.; Levine, B.; Cuervo, A.M.; Klionsky, D.J. Autophagy fights disease through cellular selfdigestion. Nature 2008, 451, 1069–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Reggiori, F.; Tucker, K.A.; Stromhaug, P.E.; Klionsky, D.J. The Atg1-Atg13 Complex Regulates Atg9 and Atg23 Retrieval Transport from the Pre-Autophagosomal Structure. Dev. Cell 2004, 6, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Efe, J.A.; Botelho, R.; Emr, S.D. Atg18 Regulates Organelle Morphology and Fab1 Kinase Activity Independent of Its Membrane Recruitment by Phosphatidylinositol 3,5-Bisphosphate. Mol. Biol. Cell 2007, 18, 4232–4244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. He, M.; Xu, Y.; Chen, J.; Luo, Y.; Lv, Y.; Su, J.; Kershaw, M.J.; Li, W.; Wang, J.; Yin, J.; et al. MoSnt2-dependent deacetylation of histone H3 mediates MoTor-dependent autophagy and plant infection by the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Autophagy 2018, 14, 1543–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Saunders, D.G.; Aves, S.J.; Talbot, N.J. Cell Cycle–Mediated Regulation of Plant Infection by the Rice Blast Fungus. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 497–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Osés-Ruiz, M.; Sakulkoo, W.; Littlejohn, G.R.; Martin-Urdiroz, M.; Talbot, N.J. Two independent S-phase checkpoints regulate appressorium-mediated plant infection by the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 114, E237–E244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Cao, H.; Huang, P.; Zhang, L.; Shi, Y.; Sun, D.; Yan, Y.; Liu, X.; Dong, B.; Chen, G.; Snyder, J.H.; et al. Characterization of 47 Cys2-His2 zinc finger proteins required for the development and pathogenicity of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. New Phytol. 2016, 211, 1035–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lu, J.-P.; Cao, H.; Zhang, L.; Huang, P.; Lin, F. Systematic Analysis of Zn2Cys6 Transcription Factors Required for Development and Pathogenicity by High-Throughput Gene Knockout in the Rice Blast Fungus. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sequence alignment of the amino acids of Kns1 in different species. A. The sequence alignment of Kns1 amino acids was made by the DNAMAN 8. The compared sequences were from Magnaporthe oryzae (MoKns1), Colletotrichum orbiculare (Lkh1, TDZ24089), Fusarium graminearum (Kns1, EYB28111.1), Homo sapiens (6FYK_A), Mus musculus (NP_001156904.1), Neurospora crassa (XP_957701.3), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (CAD6636070.1). All these Kns1 proteins have a conserved LAMMER motif (blue framed part).
Figure 1. Sequence alignment of the amino acids of Kns1 in different species. A. The sequence alignment of Kns1 amino acids was made by the DNAMAN 8. The compared sequences were from Magnaporthe oryzae (MoKns1), Colletotrichum orbiculare (Lkh1, TDZ24089), Fusarium graminearum (Kns1, EYB28111.1), Homo sapiens (6FYK_A), Mus musculus (NP_001156904.1), Neurospora crassa (XP_957701.3), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (CAD6636070.1). All these Kns1 proteins have a conserved LAMMER motif (blue framed part).
Ijms 23 08104 g001
Figure 2. MoKns1 is important for growth, conidiation and pathogenicity. (A). The wild-type 70−15 strain, the ΔMokns1 mutant and the ΔMokns1N1–C, ΔMokns1N2–C, ΔMokns1N3–C, ΔMokns1N1+N2–C, ΔMokns1N2+N3–C, ΔMokns1N1+N3–C, ΔMokns1–C complemented strains were grown on CM medium for 9 days. (B). Statistical analysis of the diameters of hyphae from the WT, the ΔMokns1 mutant and the ΔMokns1N1–C, ΔMokns1N2–C, ΔMokns1N3–C, ΔMokns1N1+N2–C, ΔMokns1N2+N3–C, ΔMokns1N1+N3–C, ΔMokns1–C complemented strains on CM (Ducan’ test, ** p < 0.01). (C). Statistical analysis of conidia production (Ducan’ test, ** p < 0.01). (D). Map of MoKns1 with three domains.
Figure 2. MoKns1 is important for growth, conidiation and pathogenicity. (A). The wild-type 70−15 strain, the ΔMokns1 mutant and the ΔMokns1N1–C, ΔMokns1N2–C, ΔMokns1N3–C, ΔMokns1N1+N2–C, ΔMokns1N2+N3–C, ΔMokns1N1+N3–C, ΔMokns1–C complemented strains were grown on CM medium for 9 days. (B). Statistical analysis of the diameters of hyphae from the WT, the ΔMokns1 mutant and the ΔMokns1N1–C, ΔMokns1N2–C, ΔMokns1N3–C, ΔMokns1N1+N2–C, ΔMokns1N2+N3–C, ΔMokns1N1+N3–C, ΔMokns1–C complemented strains on CM (Ducan’ test, ** p < 0.01). (C). Statistical analysis of conidia production (Ducan’ test, ** p < 0.01). (D). Map of MoKns1 with three domains.
Ijms 23 08104 g002
Figure 3. MoKns1 is involved in the DNA damage stress response. (A,C), sensitivity test for DNA damage stress using hydroxyurea (HU) and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). The strains were incubated on CM supplemented with 20 mM HU or 0.02% MMS at 28 °C for 8 days. (B,D), the inhibition rate was determined by plotting the percentage of colonies in the presence of various stresses in comparison with the control. Asterisks denote statistical significances (p < 0.01). (E). Relative mRNA levels of DNA damage checkpoint genes (MoMSH1/MGG_00879, MoRAD17/MGG_17052, MoCDS1/MGG_04790, MoCHK1/MGG_03729), mitotic exit genes (MoCDC14/MGG_04637, MoCDC15/MGG_04100, MoDBF2/MGG_02757, MoNUD1/MGG_02395, MoMOB1/MGG_03151, MoCDC5/MGG_09960, MoTEM1/MGG_04896), anaphase-promoting genes (MoAPC3/MGG_17195, MoAPC1/MGG_03314, MoCDC201/MGG_01236) were quantified using qPCR, and the results for the aerial mycelia of the ∆Mokns1 mutant were normalized to α-ACTIN expression and compared to the results for the WT. Error bars represent standard deviation. Significant differences compared with the wild-type strain were estimated using Duncan’s test (** p < 0.01).
Figure 3. MoKns1 is involved in the DNA damage stress response. (A,C), sensitivity test for DNA damage stress using hydroxyurea (HU) and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). The strains were incubated on CM supplemented with 20 mM HU or 0.02% MMS at 28 °C for 8 days. (B,D), the inhibition rate was determined by plotting the percentage of colonies in the presence of various stresses in comparison with the control. Asterisks denote statistical significances (p < 0.01). (E). Relative mRNA levels of DNA damage checkpoint genes (MoMSH1/MGG_00879, MoRAD17/MGG_17052, MoCDS1/MGG_04790, MoCHK1/MGG_03729), mitotic exit genes (MoCDC14/MGG_04637, MoCDC15/MGG_04100, MoDBF2/MGG_02757, MoNUD1/MGG_02395, MoMOB1/MGG_03151, MoCDC5/MGG_09960, MoTEM1/MGG_04896), anaphase-promoting genes (MoAPC3/MGG_17195, MoAPC1/MGG_03314, MoCDC201/MGG_01236) were quantified using qPCR, and the results for the aerial mycelia of the ∆Mokns1 mutant were normalized to α-ACTIN expression and compared to the results for the WT. Error bars represent standard deviation. Significant differences compared with the wild-type strain were estimated using Duncan’s test (** p < 0.01).
Ijms 23 08104 g003
Figure 4. MoKns1–N3 interacts with MoAtg18. (A). Yeast two−hybrid analysis. The pair of plasmids pGBKT7−53 and pGADT7−T was used as the positive control. Plates were incubated at 30 °C for 3 days before being photographed. (B). Pull down assays. The recombinant GST–MoKns1–N3 or GST bound to glutathione Sepharose beads was incubated with E. coli cell lysate containing His–MoAtg18. Eluted proteins were analyzed by immunoblot (IB) with the monoclonal anti–His and anti−GST antibodies.
Figure 4. MoKns1–N3 interacts with MoAtg18. (A). Yeast two−hybrid analysis. The pair of plasmids pGBKT7−53 and pGADT7−T was used as the positive control. Plates were incubated at 30 °C for 3 days before being photographed. (B). Pull down assays. The recombinant GST–MoKns1–N3 or GST bound to glutathione Sepharose beads was incubated with E. coli cell lysate containing His–MoAtg18. Eluted proteins were analyzed by immunoblot (IB) with the monoclonal anti–His and anti−GST antibodies.
Ijms 23 08104 g004
Figure 5. MoKns1–N2 interacts with MoAtg18. (A). Yeast two-hybrid analysis. The pair of plasmids pGBKT7−53 and pGADT7−T was used as the positive control. The plates were incubated at 30 °C for 3 days before being photographed. (B). Pull-down assays. Recombinant GST–MoKns1–N2 or GST bound to glutathione Sepharose beads was incubated with an E. coli cell lysate containing His−MoAtg18. The eluted proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting (IB) with the monoclonal anti−His and anti−GST antibodies.
Figure 5. MoKns1–N2 interacts with MoAtg18. (A). Yeast two-hybrid analysis. The pair of plasmids pGBKT7−53 and pGADT7−T was used as the positive control. The plates were incubated at 30 °C for 3 days before being photographed. (B). Pull-down assays. Recombinant GST–MoKns1–N2 or GST bound to glutathione Sepharose beads was incubated with an E. coli cell lysate containing His−MoAtg18. The eluted proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting (IB) with the monoclonal anti−His and anti−GST antibodies.
Ijms 23 08104 g005
Figure 6. MoKns1 is involved in autophagy. (A). Sensitivity test to Rapamycin (Duncan’s test, ** p < 0.01). (B). The inhibition rate was determined by comparing the percentage of colonies in the presence of Rapamycin to the percentage of colonies in the control. Asterisks denote statistical significances (p < 0.01). (C). The localization of GFP−MoAtg8 in the 70−15 strain and the ΔMokns1 mutant. The strains were cultured in liquid CM medium for 2 days, then transferred to SD−N medium for 4 h. Bar, 10 μm. (D). Immunoblot analysis of the degradation of GFP−MoAtg8 in SD−N medium for 2 h and 4 h in the WT strain and ΔMokns1 mutant. (E). Immunoblot analysis of MoAtg8/MoAtg8−PE turnover in the wild-type 70−15 strain and ΔMokns1 mutant.
Figure 6. MoKns1 is involved in autophagy. (A). Sensitivity test to Rapamycin (Duncan’s test, ** p < 0.01). (B). The inhibition rate was determined by comparing the percentage of colonies in the presence of Rapamycin to the percentage of colonies in the control. Asterisks denote statistical significances (p < 0.01). (C). The localization of GFP−MoAtg8 in the 70−15 strain and the ΔMokns1 mutant. The strains were cultured in liquid CM medium for 2 days, then transferred to SD−N medium for 4 h. Bar, 10 μm. (D). Immunoblot analysis of the degradation of GFP−MoAtg8 in SD−N medium for 2 h and 4 h in the WT strain and ΔMokns1 mutant. (E). Immunoblot analysis of MoAtg8/MoAtg8−PE turnover in the wild-type 70−15 strain and ΔMokns1 mutant.
Ijms 23 08104 g006
Figure 7. Analysis of the expression levels of core autophagy genes in M. oryzae. The relative mRNA levels of core autophagy genes (MoATG1/MGG_06393, MoATG2/MGG_16734, MoATG3/MGG_17909, MoATG4/MGG_03580, MoATG5/MGG_09262, MoATG6/MGG_03694, MoATG7/MGG_07297, MoATG8/MGG_01062, MoATG9/MGG_09559, MoATG11/MGG_04486, MoATG12/MGG_00598, MoATG13/MGG_454, MoATG14/MGG_03698, MoATG15/MGG_12828, MoATG16/MGG_05255, MoATG17/MGG_07667, MoATG18/MGG_03139, MoATG20/MGG_12832, MoATG22/MGG_09904, MoATG23/MGG_10579, MoATG24/MGG_03638, MoATG26/MGG_03459, MoATG27/MGG_02386, MoATG28/MGG_08061, MoATG29/MGG_02790) were quantified using qPCR, and the results were normalized to α-ACTIN expression and compared to the WT results in the aerial mycelia of ∆Mokns1 mutant. Error bars represent standard deviation. Significant differences compared with the WT were estimated using Duncan’s test (** p < 0.01).
Figure 7. Analysis of the expression levels of core autophagy genes in M. oryzae. The relative mRNA levels of core autophagy genes (MoATG1/MGG_06393, MoATG2/MGG_16734, MoATG3/MGG_17909, MoATG4/MGG_03580, MoATG5/MGG_09262, MoATG6/MGG_03694, MoATG7/MGG_07297, MoATG8/MGG_01062, MoATG9/MGG_09559, MoATG11/MGG_04486, MoATG12/MGG_00598, MoATG13/MGG_454, MoATG14/MGG_03698, MoATG15/MGG_12828, MoATG16/MGG_05255, MoATG17/MGG_07667, MoATG18/MGG_03139, MoATG20/MGG_12832, MoATG22/MGG_09904, MoATG23/MGG_10579, MoATG24/MGG_03638, MoATG26/MGG_03459, MoATG27/MGG_02386, MoATG28/MGG_08061, MoATG29/MGG_02790) were quantified using qPCR, and the results were normalized to α-ACTIN expression and compared to the WT results in the aerial mycelia of ∆Mokns1 mutant. Error bars represent standard deviation. Significant differences compared with the WT were estimated using Duncan’s test (** p < 0.01).
Ijms 23 08104 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, L.; Zhu, X.-M.; Wu, J.-Q.; Cao, N.; Bao, J.-D.; Liu, X.-H.; Lin, F.-C. The LAMMER Kinase MoKns1 Regulates Growth, Conidiation and Pathogenicity in Magnaporthe oryzae. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8104. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158104

AMA Style

Li L, Zhu X-M, Wu J-Q, Cao N, Bao J-D, Liu X-H, Lin F-C. The LAMMER Kinase MoKns1 Regulates Growth, Conidiation and Pathogenicity in Magnaporthe oryzae. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(15):8104. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158104

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Lin, Xue-Ming Zhu, Jia-Qi Wu, Na Cao, Jian-Dong Bao, Xiao-Hong Liu, and Fu-Cheng Lin. 2022. "The LAMMER Kinase MoKns1 Regulates Growth, Conidiation and Pathogenicity in Magnaporthe oryzae" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 15: 8104. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158104

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop