Quantitative In-Depth Transcriptome Analysis Implicates Peritoneal Macrophages as Important Players in the Complement and Coagulation Systems
by
, ,
Aida Paivandy
1,†, 
Srinivas Akula
2,†,
Sandra Lara
2,
Zhirong Fu
2,
Anna-Karin Olsson
1,
Sandra Kleinau
2,
Gunnar Pejler
1 and
Lars Hellman
2,* 1
Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, The Biomedical Center, SE-751 23 Uppsala, Sweden
2
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, The Biomedical Center, SE-751 24 Uppsala, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(3), 1185; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031185
Submission received: 12 December 2021
/
Revised: 17 January 2022
/
Accepted: 18 January 2022
/
Published: 21 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phenotypic and Functional Heterogeneity of Cells of the Monocytes/Macrophage Lineage)
Abstract
:To obtain a more detailed picture of macrophage (MΦ) biology, in the current study, we analyzed the transcriptome of mouse peritoneal MΦs by RNA-seq and PCR-based transcriptomics. The results show that peritoneal MΦs, based on mRNA content, under non-inflammatory conditions produce large amounts of a number of antimicrobial proteins such as lysozyme and several complement components. They were also found to be potent producers of several chemokines, including platelet factor 4 (PF4), Ccl6, Ccl9, Cxcl13, and Ccl24, and to express high levels of both TGF-β1 and TGF-β2. The liver is considered to be the main producer of most complement and coagulation components. However, we can now show that MΦs are also important sources of such compounds including C1qA, C1qB, C1qC, properdin, C4a, factor H, ficolin, and coagulation factor FV. In addition, FX, FVII, and complement factor B were expressed by the MΦs, altogether indicating that MΦs are important local players in both the complement and coagulation systems. For comparison, we analyzed human peripheral blood monocytes. We show that the human monocytes shared many characteristics with the mouse peritoneal MΦs but that there were also many major differences. Similar to the mouse peritoneal MΦs, the most highly expressed transcript in the monocytes was lysozyme, and high levels of both properdin and ficolin were observed. However, with regard to connective tissue components, such as fibronectin, lubricin, syndecan 3, and extracellular matrix protein 1, which were highly expressed by the peritoneal MΦs, the monocytes almost totally lacked transcripts. In contrast, monocytes expressed high levels of MHC Class II, whereas the peritoneal MΦs showed very low levels of these antigen-presenting molecules. Altogether, the present study provides a novel view of the phenotype of the major MΦ subpopulation in the mouse peritoneum and the large peritoneal MΦs and places the transcriptome profile of the peritoneal MΦs in a broader context, including a comparison of the peritoneal MΦ transcriptome with that of human peripheral blood monocytes and the liver.
1. Introduction
Macrophages (MΦs) were likely the first immune cells to appear during eukaryote evolution, and MΦ-like cells have been found in almost all multicellular organisms. They are present in all mammalian organs, represented by microglial cells in the brain, Kupffer cells in the liver, osteoclasts in the bone, alveolar MΦs in the lung, synovial A cells in the joints, kidney MΦs, gingival MΦs surrounding the teeth, peritoneal MΦs, intestinal MΦs as well as several MΦ types in the lymph nodes and spleen, including marginal zone, metallophilic and red pulp MΦs [1,2].
For many years, MΦs were thought to originate exclusively from blood monocytes, which after entering local tissues and under the influence of the local environment (including cell–cell contacts and different soluble factors) develop into MΦs of different phenotypes. However, it has recently been shown that many MΦ subpopulations primarily originate from an early wave of MΦs emanating from the yolk sac, and that these cells can increase in numbers by local proliferation [3,4,5,6]. Microglial cells seem to almost exclusively originate from this early wave of MΦ colonization of the brain [7,8]. This is also the case for the majority of the Kupffer cells of the liver, the alveolar macrophages, and the peritoneal MΦs [5]. In contrast, the intestinal MΦs seem almost exclusively to originate from blood monocytes [9]. Interestingly, although the majority of these MΦ subpopulations can self-renew under normal physiological conditions, almost all of them can be replaced by blood monocytes following experimental depletion [10,11,12,13,14]. However, it is not known how long-lived such monocyte-derived macrophages are in the respective tissues or whether they can self-renew within the tissue (similar to the yolk-sac-derived MΦs).
MΦs have been found to have a prominent role in many human diseases such as cancer, atherosclerosis, bone healing, scar formation, and sensitivity to infection. In addition, malfunction of lung MΦs may result in aberrant accumulation of lung surfactants, thereby causing reduced lung function. In tumors, MΦs can constitute up to 50% of the total cell number, and in such settings, there is a balance between the two major subpopulations of MΦ, defined as inflammatory M1 MΦs and immunosuppressive M2 MΦs [1]. In the presence of M1 MΦs, tumors have a lower chance of survival, whereas if the tumor can trigger a switch from M1 to M2 MΦs, tumors have an increased probability of avoiding an immune attack [1]. MΦs are also key players in the development of adaptive immune responses mediated by B and T lymphocytes. In the absence of inflammatory signals, the levels of MHC class II on MΦs are low but can increase upon engagement of pattern recognition receptors. Under such circumstances, MΦs will switch from a tissue homeostasis mode to an inflammatory mode and will thereby upregulate the expression of MHC class II and several of the early inflammatory cytokines including IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-12 [15,16,17,18].
Although numerous studies have addressed the transcriptome and proteome of MΦs found in different tissues, under various inflammatory conditions and in various diseases, there are, to our knowledge, no in-depth quantitative analyses of MΦ transcriptome in healthy tissues have been performed, except for lineage tracing (by single cell analysis) of top-expressed or lineage-related transcripts. Notably, due to the very low number of transcripts recovered from each single cell vs. a purified cell fraction, the variability in expression levels originating from the single cell analysis will therefore be high, which may also reflect technical difficulties in obtaining good coverage of all transcripts from a single cell. Together, this will limit the value of such results in determining accurate expression levels within a given cell population. Nevertheless, the large number of such studies that have been performed have resulted in a roadmap of the major phenotypic differences between different MΦ/monocyte and dendritic cell populations [19].
To obtain a quantitative view of the phenotype of different MΦ subpopulations and to evaluate the biological significance of their expressed proteins, we here analyzed the transcriptome of the major subpopulation of peritoneal MΦ in the mouse, the large peritoneal MΦ from Balb/c mice. Our study builds on previous studies but contrasts from them by providing a more detailed and quantitative view of the peritoneal MΦ transcriptome under steady-state (non-inflammatory) conditions. Our study shows that peritoneal MΦs are important producers of many different proteins, including M-lysozyme, apolipoprotein E, fibronectin, serum amyloids, chemokines, TGFβ2, and complement and coagulation components. Interestingly, by comparing the MΦ transcriptome with that of liver, we can conclude that MΦs appear to be the primary producer of many complement and coagulation components. This indicates an intricate interplay among different organs in the regulation of complement and coagulation cascades and suggests that compounds produced locally by tissue MΦs may have an important role in regulating blood coagulation and complement activation. A comparison of the peritoneal MΦ transcriptome with that of human peripheral blood monocytes revealed that these populations show many similarities but also major differences. Altogether, this study is a first step in an attempt to study phenotypic and functional heterogeneity among mammalian monocyte/macrophage subpopulations by quantitative measurements.
2. Results
2.1. Preparation of RNA from Mouse Tissues, Purified Peritoneal Cell Fractions, and Purified Human Peripheral Blood Monocytes
In the peritoneum, MΦs and B cells represent the main cell populations, constituting approximately 30–40% and 40%, respectively, of the entire peritoneal cell population [20]. The third most abundant cell population is mast cells, which constitute approximately 1–2% of the peritoneal cells. Low numbers of other immune cells including neutrophils and eosinophils can also be detected. To obtain a quantitative estimate of the total transcriptome of MΦs we purified MΦ from peritoneal lavage of thirty mice. For comparison, we additionally purified B cells from the peritoneum, and we also included an analysis of purified mast cells from the same source. Using thirty mice from the same inbred strain, thereby almost genetically identical mice, of the same age and the same living conditions, we reduced the influence on the result by variations between individuals.
MΦs and B cells were purified by FACS using a panel of monoclonal antibodies. Cells were first gated based on forward and side scattering, followed by gating based on positivity for CD19, CD11b, and F4/80 (Figure 1). By using this strategy, well-separated MΦ (large CD11b high and F4/80 high) and B cell (CD19+) populations were obtained (Figure 1) [20], followed by preparation of total RNA from the respective populations. RNA was also prepared from a number of mouse Balb/c organs to be used as reference material to evaluate the tissue specificity of MΦ-expressed genes. RNA preparations from the peritoneal MΦs, B cells, ears and lung RNA were then subjected to transcriptome analysis using RNA-seq methodology. Reads were normalized towards the length of the individual mRNAs and listed as a fraction of the entire transcriptome. The same samples were analyzed by the PCR-based mouse Ampliseq transcriptome analysis platform. For the Ampliseq analysis, we included RNA from eight additional tissues as reference samples: brain, tongue, liver, duodenum, pancreas, colon, kidney, and uterus.
As a reference sample representing bone-marrow-derived cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage, we purified human peripheral blood monocytes (Figure 2), followed by RNA isolation and analysis using the Ampliseq technology. In Table 1, we present the result from one individual. However, we have data from five different individuals of different age and sex that are presented in Supplementary Materials Table S1. As can be seen from this Table S1, the results between individuals are consistent, despite some variations in absolute levels between individuals. However, one remarkable finding was the almost total absence of HLA-B and/or -C expression in some individuals, indicating that some individuals may have a reduced MHC class I repertoire, which may affect their sensitivity to infection by intracellular parasites (Supplementary Materials Table S1). We also observed relatively large differences between individuals in the expression levels of the different immunoglobulin Fc receptors (Supplementary Materials Table S1).
2.2. Analysis of Transcript Levels in Mouse Peritoneal MΦs and Human Peripheral Blood Monocytes
In Table 1, the expression of genes essential for MΦ function are displayed, and a comparison between expression levels in the peritoneal MΦs vs. human monocytes is also included. Further, a comparison of the results obtained using the two different transcriptome approaches (RNA-seq vs. Ampliseq) are displayed. We focused on the following categories of genes: the most highly expressed genes, antibacterial proteins, receptors, cell adhesion molecules, cytokines, chemokines and cytokine/chemokine receptors, complement factors, coagulation factor cell signaling molecules, and transcription factors to obtain a detailed picture of the biological function of this population of mouse peritoneal MΦs. This analysis revealed the most abundant transcripts of the MΦs are those coding for lysozyme (an antibacterial protein), fibronectin (a connective tissue component), serum amyloids (i.e., Saa3 and Saa1), apolipoprotein E, arachinodate15-lipoxygenase (Alox15), and a number of different lysosomal proteases (i.e., cathepsins B, D, L, A, S, Z, and H) (Table 1, (A, B, D, I)). High levels of additional lysosomal proteins were also observed, including lysosomal membrane protein 5 (Laptm5), prosaposin (Psap) and alpha-mannosidase (Man2b1) (Table 1, (F)). Relatively high levels of lipid mediator-related enzymes were also observed, including phospholipase A2 (Pla2g7), prostaglandin I synthase (Ptgis) and arachinodate-5-lipoxygenase (Alox5) (Table 1, (B)).
By using this strategy, we noted some apparent discrepancies between the two transcriptome approaches. Hence, the RNA-seq approach appears suitable for distinguishing closely related genes, such as M and P lysozymes (Lyz1 and Lyz2), whereas the Ampliseq method was able to detect genes having high sequence divergence as exemplified by the MHC class I alpha chain and the MHC class II alpha and beta chains. As judged by the RNA-seq data, the peritoneal MΦs appear to only express the M-lysozyme (Lyz1), whereas the Ampliseq method appears to be less capable of differentiating between Lyz1 and 2 (Table 1, (A)). Further, the RNA-seq approach indicated expression of both serum amyloid 3 and 1 (Saa3 and Saa1), whereas Ampliseq detected Saa3 only (Table 1, (A)). It was also noted that the Ampliseq method appeared to be superior to the RNA-seq approach for detecting the MHC class I alpha chain and the MHC Class II alpha/beta chains, again suggesting that the Ampliseq method is well suited to detect highly variable molecules (Table 1).
In contrast to the slightly disparate results for selected genes (see above), both techniques provided highly similar results for the absolute majority of genes analyzed including several cell adhesion molecules such as integrin alpha-m (Itgam), integrin alpha-6 (Itga6), integrin beta-2 (Itgb2), P-selectin (Selp), and ICAM2 (Table 1, (P)). Both approaches also reveal high levels of the MHC class I component beta-2 microglobulin, FcgRIII, the signaling component of the Fc receptors (i.e., Fcer1g), and several protease inhibitors including cystatin C, SLPI, Serpin B2, and Timp2. We also observed high levels of FcRN, the transport receptor for IgG but low levels of Fc-gamma receptor 4 (Fcgr4) and even lower expression of the high affinity receptor for IgG (Fcgr1) (Table 1, (J)). Contradicting results were obtained for the negatively regulating Fc receptor for IgG (Fcgr2b), for which we noted a high expression level based on RNA-seq but only low levels based on Ampliseq analysis (Table 1, (J)).
Among the most highly expressed transcripts, we also found several key components of the complement and coagulation systems. High expression of genes encoding the complement component C1q (C1qA, C1qB, and C1qC) was found based on the RNA-seq data, whereas the Ampliseq approach revealed primarily expression of C1q-B (Table 1, (E)). High levels of C4a, C4b, properdin (Cfp), and factor H were also seen (Table 1, (E)).
We also noted high expression of cytochrome b245 (Nox2/cytochrome b558), a compound with a role in the formation of reactive oxygen species as part of the antibacterial and antiviral responses mediated by MΦs (Table 1, (A)). Among the highly expressed transcripts, we also found PAD-4 (Padi4). PAD-4 is essential for the deamination of arginine on histone H3, converting it to citrulline, thereby reducing the charge of the histones. This process is essential for formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), a process where decondensed chromatin is expelled into the extracellular environment together with granule protein. After their initial discovery in neutrophils, formation of extracellular DNA traps has also been reported in several other innate immune cells (Table 1, (C)) [21]. High levels of transcripts for several proteins thought to be involved in phagocytosis were also observed, including filamin B and A, CD209b, and Timd4, the latter a receptor for phosphatidyl serine exposed on the surface of apoptotic cells (Table 1, (C)). However, we neither detected transcripts for the defensin family of antibacterial peptides or for cathelicidin nor did we detect transcripts for neutrophil granule proteins (i.e., myeloperoxidase, N-elastase, proteinase 3, and cathepsin G) (Table 1, (C) and data not shown).
Of the scavenger receptors, only very low levels of Marco, CD177, CD163, Scarb1, and Scara 3 and 5 were observed, whereas higher expression of Scarb2, CD36 (Scrb3), and CD68 was seen (Table 1, (M)). Of the classical monocyte/MΦ surface markers, we found relatively high levels of CD14, lower levels of CD40 and CD86 (B7-2), and even lower levels of CD80 (B7-1) (Table 1, (L)). As expected, expression of the T-cell marker CD28 and of the dendritic cell activation marker, CD83, was essentially undetectable (Table 1, (L)).
By comparing the expression levels of this panel of mouse MΦ transcripts with human peripheral blood monocytes, we observed a marked difference between these two cell populations in many aspects but also clear similarities. Notably, lysozyme was the most highly expressed transcript in both cell types. Similar to the MΦs, we found high expression of filamin A, cytochrome b245, and serglycin (Table 1, (B and C) and Supplementary Table S1) in the monocytes. However, in contrast to the MΦs, the monocytes did not express significant amounts of amyloids (Table 1, (A)), and completely lacked the expression of fibronectin, lubricin, syndecan 3, and extracellular matrix protein 1 (Table 1, (B)).
There was also a major difference concerning the lipid mediators (Table 1, (D)). In contrast to the mouse peritoneal MΦs, the monocytes expressed only low levels of phospholipase A2, Alox15, prostaglandin I synthase (Ptgis), and apolipoprotein E (ApoE) (Table 1, (D)). On the other hand, similar to the peritoneal MΦs, no expression of defensin or cathelicidin was detected in the monocytes (Table 1, (C)). When examining the expression of complement and coagulation components, we observed major differences between the two cell populations. Whereas both populations express high levels of properdin and ficolin, the monocytes, in contrast to the MΦs, did not express C1q, C4a, C4b, or complement factor H, and they also lacked expression of all coagulation components (Table 1, (E and F)). Both populations expressed high levels of the lysosomal proteins Laptm5, Psap, and cathepsins B, D, and S, whereas the monocytes showed low levels of cathepsins L and A and essentially lacked expression of the alpha-mannosidase (Ma2b1) (Table 1, (I)).
The two populations showed similarities in the expression of immunoglobulin Fc receptors. Mouse peritoneal MΦs expressed high levels of FcgRIII, whereas human monocytes had a high expression of FcgRIIa. Both populations expressed low levels of FcgRI and high levels of the signaling component FceRIg (Table 1, (J)). Further, it is noteworthy that both expressed high levels of FcRN (Table 1, (J)) as well as relatively high levels of MHC Class I molecules but differed markedly in their expression of MHC Class II molecules (Table 1, (K)): the monocytes showed high levels of both HLA-DR and HLA-DP but almost completely lacked HLA-DQ, whereas the mouse MΦs expressed low levels of MHC Class II (Table 1, (K)). Similar to the mouse MΦs, the monocytes expressed high levels of CD14 (Table 1, (L)) and relatively high levels of B7-2 but low levels of B7-1 (Table 1, (L)). The monocytes also expressed low levels of Relma (Retln; a receptor thought to regulate TH2 immunity) compared to the mouse MΦs (Table 1, (L)) [22]. Concerning scavenger receptors, both populations showed low levels of Marco and CD177 and different Scara members but high levels of CD68 and CD36 (Table 1, (M)). The human monocytes expressed higher levels of CD163 compared to the mouse peritoneal MΦs (Table 1, (M)). With regard to cytokine, chemokine, and endothelin receptors, some major differences were noted. Mouse MΦs expressed high levels of the FGF receptor 1, whereas the monocytes almost completely lacked expression of this receptor (Table 1, (N)). Further, the monocytes expressed low levels of the M-CSF receptor compared to the mouse MΦs (Table 1, (N)). The monocytes also showed very low levels of GM-CSF receptor expression compared to the MΦs (Table 1, (N)). In contrast, whereas monocytes showed a high level of G-CSF receptor expression, the peritoneal MΦs expressed low levels (Table 1, (N)). Both populations showed high levels of Tnfrsf1b (a TNF receptor) (Table 1, (N)). Both populations also show relatively high levels of IL-10 receptor expression (Table 1, (N)). Relatively low levels of expression were seen for most of the other cytokine receptors in both MΦs and monocytes (Table 1, (N)).
When analyzing the expression of cell adhesion molecules, we also noted several major differences between the two populations. Of these, the top transcript in MΦs was integrin alpha m with considerably lower expression in the monocytes (Table 1, (P)). Low levels of integrin beta1 expression was also seen in the monocytes vs. the MΦs (Table 1, (P)). A similar situation was seen for P-selectin, Emilin2, and ICAM-2 with high levels in MΦs and lower expression in monocytes (Table 1, (P)). With regard to chemokines and cytokines, we noted major differences. Platelet factor 4 was expressed at very high levels in the peritoneal MΦs but at low levels in the monocytes (Table 1, (Q)). Ccl6, Ccl9 Cxcl13, and Cxcl14 were all expressed at high levels in the mouse MΦs but were almost totally absent in the monocytes (Table 1, (Q)). The only cytokines/chemokines for which significant expression was seen in the monocytes were Cxcl16, Tgfb1, TNF-alpha, and Vegfa (Table 1, (Q)).
Of selected signaling components, Tyro binding protein (Tyrobp) was expressed at significant levels in the monocytes (Table 1, (R)). Among selected transcription factors, we found significant expression levels for Pu.1, Runx3, and Zab2. Notably, none of the GATA factors were expressed at significant levels (Table 1, (R)). In the peritoneal MΦs, only GATA6 was expressed at significant levels (Table 1, (S)).
2.3. Analysis of Transcript Levels for a Panel of Pattern Recognition Receptors and Proteins Involved in Angiogenesis
The expression of receptors involved in sensing microbial components, including Toll-like receptors, NOD, and Rig receptors as well as several transcripts involved in angiogenesis, is summarized in Table 2. For comparison, we included data from mouse peritoneal mast cells, B cells, and human blood monocytes in this analysis. As seen in Table 2, the expression levels for all these transcripts are remarkably low in all four analyzed cell populations, in agreement with previous studies of mast cells [23]. For some of these microbial sensors we see somewhat higher levels of transcripts, including TLR-4, -13 -7, and -8 (Table 2, (A)). MDA5 and Rig 1 were both expressed in all four cell populations but at relatively low levels (Table 2, (A)). Angiogenesis-related transcripts were low to undetectable in the MΦs, suggesting that the peritoneal MΦs may not have an important role in angiogenesis (Table 2, (B)). In contrast, mast cells express relatively high levels of such transcripts, including Vegfa and Vegfb. Mast cells but neither MΦs nor B cells also express significant levels of angiopoietin 1 but not angiopoietin 2 (Table 2, (B)). Notably, different to the peritoneal MΦs, the monocytes express Vegfa (Table 2).
2.4. Analysis of Transcript Levels in the Mouse Liver
As detailed above, a number of plasma components, including antibacterial proteins, amyloids, and complement components, were identified in the MΦ transcriptome. The liver is generally implicated as the main producer of the majority of such plasma proteins, and it was therefore of interest to compare the expression levels of such compounds between the liver and the peritoneal MΦs. To this end, we also performed a corresponding transcriptome analysis of the liver and of a number of other organs as reference material.
The liver consists of a number of cells, including hepatocytes, liver MΦs (named Kupffer cells), liver endothelial cells (LECs), and fat cells. Hepatocytes are the major population of the liver, and most of the transcripts in the liver thereby originate from this cell population. Notably, no or very low expression of the serum amyloids 3 and 1, C1qA, C1qB, C1qC, properdin or ficolin was observed in the liver transcriptome. The main amyloid of the liver was instead Saa4 but was expressed at lower levels compared with the expression of Saa3 and 1 by the MΦs (Table 3, (A) and Table 1, (A)). Instead, our transcriptome analysis indicated that the liver is the main producer of the majority of both complement and coagulation factors, including fibrinogen (Fgb, Fga and Fgg), thrombin (F2), and coagulation factors V, VII, X, XII, and XIII. Low levels of factors IX, XI, and VIII were also observed (Table 3B). The most highly expressed transcripts for complement proteins were factor 3 (C3), factor H (Cfh), factor 4 (C4b), C4-binding protein (C4bp), factor 8 gamma (C8g) factor 5 (Hc), C-reactive protein (Crp), C1r, and the C1q-binding protein (C1qbp) (Table 3, (C)). Lower levels of factor 8b and factor 8a were seen, along with very low levels of C1qb, C2, ficolin (Fcna), and properdin (Cfp) (Table 3, (E)). The latter most likely originate from Kupffer cells of the liver, as these components are expressed at very high levels by the peritoneal MΦs (Table 1). Coagulation factor VIII is most likely almost exclusively produced by the liver endothelial cells (LECs) [27]. This coagulation factor is also produced at low levels by the kidneys and in the uterus (Table 3, (D)). As expected, liver is the major producer of albumin (Table 3, (A)). Very high expression levels were seen for different enzymes involved in lipid biosynthesis, including stearoyl coenzyme A desaturase (Scd); the fatty-acid-binding protein (Fabp1); the apolipoproteins A1, C1, C3, and E; the retinol-binding protein (Rbp4) (Table 3, (B)). Genes coding for enzymes involved in amino acid metabolism were also highly expressed (Table 3B).
2.5. Analysis of Transcripts Representing a Panel of Signature Genes Identified by Single Cell Analysis of Monocytes, Dendritic Cells, and MΦs from Different Tissues
A number of signature genes have been identified by single cell analysis of monocytes, dendritic cells, and different MΦ subpopulations originating from different mouse tissues [19]. In Figure 3, we placed our data in the context of these earlier studies. As can be seen, both types of studies matched remarkably well; all except five of the transcripts previously identified as signature genes for peritoneal MΦs by single cell analysis were significantly expressed in the peritoneal MΦs in the present study. In contrast, relatively few of the signature genes for other MΦ subpopulations, dendritic cells, and monocytes were significantly expressed based on our analysis of peritoneal MΦs (Figure 3).
3. Discussion
Analysis of the total transcriptome by several recently developed platforms have made it possible to, with high resolution, analyze the expression levels of all the genes within the entire genome of a species. However, there were some difficulties involved in the way such analyses were performed. In addition, in the majority of the published transcriptome analyses, the information was generally presented in the form of heat maps, which provide relative values compared to other tissues, sample conditions, etc. Transcripts differing by several orders of magnitude in expression levels are in these heat maps often depicted in the same color, bright red or bright blue. By this type of presentation, valuable quantitative information is lost.
During this and previous work, we experienced a high impact of the reference library used for the RNA-seq analysis when generating the final data used for comparative studies. Genomic reference libraries have a large tendency to give high error frequency and should, based on our experience, therefore be avoided. Instead, good global mRNA transcriptomic libraries provide the most reliable data for these types of studies.
In a previous study, we attempted to validate transcriptome data by applying different methods. In a study of the mouse mast cell transcriptome, we compared three different independent strategies, and we were able to show that they gave highly similar results [23]. Hence, based on such a systematic comparison of independent methods for transcriptomic analyses, we are confident that the data presented here represent reliable quantitative information concerning MΦ-related transcripts. However, even after performing such a validation, there are potential pitfalls. For example, in our RNA-seq data, the highly variable molecules MHC Class I and II were not detected, most likely due to the fact of that their high variability results in difficulties of detection. The sequence reads may not match 100% to the corresponding sequence in the reference library and were therefore not counted. In contrast, these genes were detected by the Ampliseq approach, and it thus appears that the Ampliseq methodology was less sensitive to minor sequence differences. However, the Ampliseq method appears less reliable for distinguishing between highly homologous transcripts, e.g., between Lyz1 and Lyz2, between C4a and C4b, and between C1qA, C1qB, and C1qC. However, by combining the two technologies we can overcome most of these problems and obtain reliable data concerning the transcriptome of the studied tissues and cells.
To obtain a sufficient number of cells to obtain a good coverage of the transcriptome and thereby high-quality quantitative information, we collected peritoneal cells from thirty mice. Using thirty mice from the same in-bred strain, and thereby almost genetically identical mice of the same age and the same living conditions, we also reduced the influence on the results by variations between individuals and obtained a good estimate of the transcription levels of all the transcripts within these cell populations in this strain of mice.
Based on the results from the two transcriptome platforms, we noted that these large CD11b high and F4/80 high peritoneal MΦs are potent producers of a number of different proteins, including lysozyme, Saa3, and Saa1, whereas they almost completely lack Saa4 (Table 1, (A)). Saa4 is instead the major serum amyloid produced by the liver (Table 3). The human monocytes seemed to lack expression of all of the amyloids (Table 1, (A) and Supplementary Materials Table S1)). Based on the RNA-seq data we see that, as expected, MΦs exclusively express the M-Lysozyme (Lyz1).
MΦs are highly mobile cells and also active phagocytes. Molecules that are important for both of these processes were expressed at very high levels, including cell adhesion molecules such as the integrins alpha-M, alpha-6, beta-2 and beta-1, P-selectin, and ICAM-2 (Table 1). MΦs are also the major phagocytic cells of the body, and in this capacity, the lysosomes play a central role. In line with this, we found high expression of several lysosomal proteases (cathepsins B, D, L, A, S, Z, and H) in the peritoneal MΦs (Table 1, (I)). It was also interesting that the peritoneal MΦs expressed high levels of a number of complement components and also a few components of the coagulation system. In contrast, the corresponding transcripts were almost totally absent in the liver transcriptome, indicating that the peritoneal MΦs are the prime producers of several of these components. This indicates a complex pattern of regulation of both of these systems, including the production both centrally by the liver and locally in the various tissues by MΦs.
We also observed very high levels of transcripts for fibronectin in the peritoneal MΦs (Table 1). This is in agreement with earlier studies at the protein level [28]. Generally, it is thought that liver is the major source of plasma fibronectin and that fibroblasts are the main producers of tissue fibronectin. However, based on the present study, peritoneal MΦs express ~25 times higher levels of fibronectin compared with liver. Hence, peritoneal MΦs are probably important local producers of this protein. We also found that MΦs produce high levels of additional connective tissue components, including lubricin (Prg4), syndecan-3 (Sdc3), and extracellular matrix protein 1 (Ecm1) (Table 1, (B)). All of these were essentially absent in monocytes, indicating a major difference between blood monocytes and tissue MΦs with regard to connective tissue homeostasis (Table 1, (B)). We also noted that PAD-4 (of major importance for the formation of NETs) was expressed at much higher levels in MΦs vs. monocytes, indicating differences in the ability of the respective populations to produce DNA containing extracellular traps.
MΦs in general proliferate in response to M-CSF. In line with this, the peritoneal MΦs were found to express high levels of the M-CSF and the GM-CSF receptors but relatively low levels of G-CSF receptor (Table 1, (N)). Interestingly, and unexpectedly, we observed the opposite for the human monocytes, where the G-CSF receptor was the dominating cytokine receptor (Table 1, (N) and Supplementary Materials Table S1). The significance of this is not known but indicates a marked difference in cytokine regulation between the two populations.
MΦs are found in all tissues of the body, where they are adopted for particular functions related to the respective tissue. A major question in the field of MΦ biology has been to outline differences in phenotype and function between these MΦ subpopulations. By single cell analysis, clear differences were identified between MΦ subpopulations. For example, intestinal MΦs differ substantially in phenotype from all of the other MΦ subpopulations, and dendritic cells appeared as a separate cluster distinct from both the majority of yolk-sac-derived MΦ subpopulations and intestinal MΦs [19]. Gene expression patterns that specify these different subpopulations have recently been revealed [19].
To obtain insight into possible differences between these MΦ populations, we specifically looked at all the transcripts listed for these different mouse MΦ, monocyte, and DC subpopulations and listed the expression levels of these marker genes in a table for more easy comparison. All the transcripts with a level higher than 50 reads were marked orange in Figure 3. As can be seen from the Figure 3, our data confirm most of the data from the single cell analysis. Almost all of the marker genes identified by single cell analysis for mouse peritoneal MΦs were expressed at higher than 50 reads in our analysis (Figure 3). However, there were five genes that did not seem to fit the single cell data, i.e., Car6, Cyp26a, Lbp, Rarb, and Sox7, as all of them showed relatively low levels of expression in our analysis of the peritoneal MΦs (Figure 3). A few of the marker genes for other populations were also expressed at a level of more than 50 reads in our analysis of the peritoneal MΦ population. There were five such genes in the lung marker gene list, 11 in the Kupffer cell list, seven in the monocyte list, 10 in the microglia list, none in the intestinal MΦ list, and only one in the list of the DCs (Figure 3). However, when we look at these marker genes a majority are actually expressed at relatively high levels in most tissues analyzed, indicating that they are poor representatives as marker genes.
An interesting finding from the single cell studies of MΦs was that the transcriptomes of various MΦ subpopulations differed substantially, indicating major functional differences. From such studies, it was evident that the MΦ population that was the most different from the peritoneal MΦs was the intestinal MΦs and the dendritic cells and, to a slightly lesser extent, the monocytes (Figure 3). To obtain more direct evidence for similarities and differences between these different MΦ populations, an in-depth quantitative analysis of expression levels of the entire transcriptome of these subpopulations would be very informative to more specifically identify the major differences in biological function between these populations. It has for example been shown that the two major subpopulations of MΦs in the peritoneum, the large CD11b high and F4/80 high, analyzed in this communication, and the small CD11b high and F4/80 low populations had, at least partly, different biological functions [20,29]. The large peritoneal MΦs seemed to originate from the yolk sac and were self-renewing, whereas the minor population of small F4/80 low population seemed to be monocyte derived and better at antigen presentation to naive T cells compared to the major large F4/80 high subpopulation [30]. In line with this finding the large peritoneal MΦs showed a low level of expression of MHC Class II as is also shown here, whereas the small peritoneal MΦs expressed relatively high levels of MHC Class II [20,31]. The large peritoneal MΦs seems instead to be the most important cell type, of these two, in the clearance of bacterial cells during abdominal sepsis [31]. However, they seem also to be a potential reservoir of Staphylococcus aureus, as these bacteria seem to survive inside the MΦs. By removing the bacteria from the peritoneal cavity by phagocytosis, they delay the influx of neutrophils, which seems to be essential for the clearance of the bacterial infection [32].
We also observed some major differences in the expression of transcription factors. The only GATA factor expressed by the mouse peritoneal MΦs was GATA-6, whereas human blood monocytes were negative for all GATA factors. The peritoneal MΦs also expressed Pu.1 and Zeb2 at high levels and lower levels of Runx1 (Table 1, (S)). The major transcription factors expressed by the human monocytes were also Pu.1 and Zeb2, and monocytes also expressed Runx3 (Table 1, (S)). Other transcription factors are most likely involved, but the ones highlighted here are those that most clearly separated the MΦs from the other mouse cells and tissues included in the analysis. Several of these transcription factors have been shown to control the expression of the M-CSF receptor, a receptor with a major role in the proliferation, differentiation, and survival of cells of the MΦ lineage [33].
Concerning Fc-receptors, we also obtained several interesting new findings. It is known that FcgRIII is expressed by mouse MΦs and that FcgrIIA is highly expressed by human MΦs and monocytes, and it is also known that low levels of the high affinity Fc receptor FcgRI can be found on both populations. However, the presence of FcRN on either of the populations has, to our knowledge, not previously been reported, but further work is required to determine the function of this receptor in a MΦ/monocyte context. The expression levels of these receptors differed also quite extensively between individuals in the human monocytes, indicating that they may vary depending on inflammatory status of a person, even if these donors were all healthy blood donors (Supplementary Materials Table S1).
Interesting was also the very low levels in all analyzed cell populations of the pattern recognition receptors: the RIG, NOD, and Toll-like receptors. These low levels were apparently still sufficient for a rapid response by these cell populations and the question is if they remain at the same levels also after response to, for example, LPS interaction with TLR-4 or if there is a strong up- or downregulation of these receptors upon responding to the ligand.
In summary, we here presented a detailed quantitative map of one population of mouse MΦs, the large peritoneal MΦs, and placed this in the context of the transcriptome of human peripheral blood monocytes and the total mouse liver transcriptome. We analyzed approximately 240 different transcripts and obtained quantitative measurements of their expression levels in these three tissues and also made comparisons with eight other tissues and of mouse peritoneal B cells. This information can now serve as a roadmap to study phenotypic and functional differences between different subpopulations of cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage. The most interesting finding was the apparent major role of tissue MΦs in both the complement and coagulation systems and the major difference between monocytes and MΦs concerning their role in connective tissue homeostasis. We also observed a major difference in the steady-state levels of MHC Class II, a molecule central for antigen presentation. Monocytes seem here to be ready to perform this task without prior activation, whereas tissue MΦs needs activation to become active antigen-presenting cells. Although some of the differences observed may depend on species-specific differences, we can conclude that there are major differences in the transcriptome and thereby also the in vivo function of tissue MΦs and circulating monocytes.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Mice
Female BALB/c mice were purchased from Taconic Biosciences (Ejby, Denmark) and maintained at the animal facility of the Biomedical Center (Uppsala University). The animal experiments were approved by the local ethics committee (Uppsala djurförsöksetiska nämnd; Dnr 5.8.18-05357/2018).
4.2. Peritoneal Cell Extraction and FACS Sorting of Peritoneal Macrophages and B Cells
For the extraction of peritoneal cells, thirty mice were euthanized by neck dislocation during isoflurane anesthesia, the abdominal skin was removed, and 9 mL of ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was injected into the peritoneal cavity. After making sure that the injected PBS was thoroughly dispersed within the peritoneal cavity, peritoneal lavage fluid was collected, and the cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 400× g for 10 min. The cells were resuspended in PBS (pH 7.4) with 2% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA), followed by incubation with the following fluorescent-labeled antibodies: F4/80 (BM8), CD11b (M1/70), CD19 (1D3), CD117 (2B8), and FcεRI (MAR-1). The antibodies were obtained from BD Biosciences (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) or eBioscience (Hatfield, UK). FACS-isolated peritoneal macrophages and B cells were collected for RNA isolation. The flow cytometry-based cell sorting was performed on a FACSAria III (BD Biosciences), and data were analyzed with FlowJo software (TreeStar Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).
4.3. Isolation of Human Peripheral Blood Monocytes by Magnetic Cell Sorting
Peripheral blood monocytes were isolated from peripheral blood obtained from healthy donors at the Akademiska Hospital in Uppsala, Sweden, in the form of buffy coats. PBMCs were isolated using Ficoll–Paque Plus (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) and standard density gradient centrifugation. PBMCs were further washed with PBS containing 2 mM of EDTA and incubated with anti-CD14-coated magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Positive selection of CD14+ cells was performed through magnetic cell separation. Subsequently, CD14 cells were stained with anti-human CD14 PE antibody (clone: 61D3, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and the purity was verified (over 90%) on a MACSQuant VYB Flow Cytometer (Miltenyi Biotec). Approximately 4 million of these cells were immediately pelleted, and the total RNA was purified by a standard protocol.
4.4. RNA Isolation
Total RNA was prepared from FACS-sorted cells and CD14+ monocytes using the Nucleospin RNA kit from (Macherey-Nagel, Duren, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The RNA was eluted with 30 μL of DEPC-treated water, and the concentration of RNA was determined by using a NanoDrop ND-1000 (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). Later the integrity of the RNA was confirmed by visualization on 1.2% agarose gel using ethidium bromide staining.
Ear, lung, liver, brain, heart, tongue, pancreas, duodenum, colon, kidney, uterus, and spleen tissues were carefully dissected from the mouse. Immediately after removal from the animal, the tissues were frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground into a fine powder with a pestle in a mortar. The tissue powder was then used for total RNA isolation using the same protocol as for the cell fractions described above.
4.5. Analysis of the Transcriptome by RNA-seq and by the Thermo Fisher Ampliseq Chip and PCR-Based Method
Total RNA from the different cell fractions and whole tissues were sent to GATC-Biotech (Konstanz, Germany) for transcriptome analysis. The procedure was that they purified mRNA by poly A selection following fragmenting of the RNA and then performing sequencing of 20–30 million fragments. The individual reads of a length of in general 50–100 nucleotides are then matched against a reference library. After testing several strategies and reference libraries, the results from the sequencing were run against a transcriptome reference. This transcriptome reference resulted in highly reliable data, which matched well with previous cDNA library screenings and later also with the Thermo Fisher chip-based Ampliseq transcriptomic platform at the SciLife Lab in Uppsala, Sweden. The number of reads per gene was, for the RNA-seq data from GATC, then adjusted to the transcript length as longer transcripts generate more fragments per mRNA and, thereby, a higher number of reads. The Thermo Fisher Mouse Ampliseq transcriptome analysis platform is based on the purification on a chip of the individual mRNAs, which are then PCR amplified and sequenced individually. The RNA is not fragmented, which is why, in general, every mRNA was read only once and the number of reads then matched the expression level more directly.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23031185/s1.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.P., S.A., S.L. and L.H.; Investigation, A.P., S.A. and S.L.; Data curation, L.H.; Funding acquisition, G.P. and L.H.; Supervision and Writing original draft, L.H.; Language editing, A.P., S.A., Z.F., A.-K.O., S.K. and G.P.. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (KAW2017-0022).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
All data is included in the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Gordon, S.; Pluddemann, A. Tissue macrophages: Heterogeneity and functions. BMC Biol. 2017, 15, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fujiyama, S.; Nakahashi-Oda, C.; Abe, F.; Wang, Y.; Sato, K.; Shibuya, A. Identification and isolation of splenic tissue-resident macrophage sub-populations by flow cytometry. Int. Immunol. 2018, 31, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sieweke, M.H.; Allen, J.E. Beyond stem cells: Self-renewal of differentiated macrophages. Science 2013, 342, 1242974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amit, I.; Winter, D.R.; Jung, S. The role of the local environment and epigenetics in shaping macrophage identity and their effect on tissue homeostasis. Nat. Immunol. 2016, 17, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perdiguero, E.G.; Klapproth, K.; Schulz, C.; Busch, K.; de Bruijn, M.; Rodewald, H.R.; Geissmann, F. The Origin of Tissue-Resident Macrophages: When an Erythro-myeloid Progenitor Is an Erythro-myeloid Progenitor. Immunity 2015, 43, 1023–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hoeffel, G.; Chen, J.; Lavin, Y.; Low, D.; Almeida, F.F.; See, P.; Beaudin, A.E.; Lum, J.; Low, I.; Forsberg, E.C.; et al. C-Myb(+) erythro-myeloid progenitor-derived fetal monocytes give rise to adult tissue-resident macrophages. Immunity 2015, 42, 665–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ginhoux, F.; Greter, M.; Leboeuf, M.; Nandi, S.; See, P.; Gokhan, S.; Mehler, M.F.; Conway, S.J.; Ng, L.G.; Stanley, E.R.; et al. Fate mapping analysis reveals that adult microglia derive from primitive macrophages. Science 2010, 330, 841–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kierdorf, K.; Erny, D.; Goldmann, T.; Sander, V.; Schulz, C.; Perdiguero, E.G.; Wieghofer, P.; Heinrich, A.; Riemke, P.; Holscher, C.; et al. Microglia emerge from erythromyeloid precursors via Pu.1- and Irf8-dependent pathways. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bain, C.C.; Bravo-Blas, A.; Scott, C.L.; Perdiguero, E.G.; Geissmann, F.; Henri, S.; Malissen, B.; Osborne, L.C.; Artis, D.; Mowat, A.M. Constant replenishment from circulating monocytes maintains the macrophage pool in the intestine of adult mice. Nat. Immunol. 2014, 15, 929–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hoeffel, G.; Ginhoux, F. Fetal monocytes and the origins of tissue-resident macrophages. Cell Immunol. 2018, 330, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoeksema, M.A.; Glass, C.K. Nature and nurture of tissue-specific macrophage phenotypes. Atherosclerosis 2019, 281, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hume, D.A.; Irvine, K.M.; Pridans, C. The Mononuclear Phagocyte System: The Relationship between Monocytes and Macrophages. Trends Immunol. 2019, 40, 98–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guilliams, M.; Thierry, G.R.; Bonnardel, J.; Bajenoff, M. Establishment and Maintenance of the Macrophage Niche. Immunity 2020, 52, 434–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jenkins, S.J.; Hume, D.A. Homeostasis in the mononuclear phagocyte system. Trends Immunol. 2014, 35, 358–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Meng, F.; Lowell, C.A. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced macrophage activation and signal transduction in the absence of Src-family kinases Hck, Fgr, and Lyn. J. Exp. Med. 1997, 185, 1661–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saito, S.; Matsuura, M.; Hirai, Y. Regulation of lipopolysaccharide-induced interleukin-12 production by activation of repressor element GA-12 through hyperactivation of the ERK pathway. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2006, 13, 876–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xaus, J.; Comalada, M.; Barrachina, M.; Herrero, C.; Gonalons, E.; Soler, C.; Lloberas, J.; Celada, A. The expression of MHC class II genes in macrophages is cell cycle dependent. J. Immunol. 2000, 165, 6364–6371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ting, J.P.; Trowsdale, J. Genetic control of MHC class II expression. Cell 2002, 109, S21–S33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Summers, K.M.; Bush, S.J.; Hume, D.A. Network analysis of transcriptomic diversity amongst resident tissue macrophages and dendritic cells in the mouse mononuclear phagocyte system. PLoS Biol. 2020, 18, e3000859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghosn, E.E.; Cassado, A.A.; Govoni, G.R.; Fukuhara, T.; Yang, Y.; Monack, D.M.; Bortoluci, K.R.; Almeida, S.R.; Herzenberg, L.A.; Herzenberg, L.A. Two physically, functionally, and developmentally distinct peritoneal macrophage subsets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 2568–2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Conceicao-Silva, F.; Reis, C.S.M.; De Luca, P.M.; Leite-Silva, J.; Santiago, M.A.; Morrot, A.; Morgado, F.N. The Immune System Throws Its Traps: Cells and Their Extracellular Traps in Disease and Protection. Cells 2021, 10, 1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pesce, J.T.; Ramalingam, T.R.; Wilson, M.S.; Mentink-Kane, M.M.; Thompson, R.W.; Cheever, A.W.; Urban, J.F., Jr.; Wynn, T.A. Retnla (relmalpha/fizz1) suppresses helminth-induced Th2-type immunity. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5, e1000393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Akula, S.; Paivandy, A.; Fu, Z.; Thorpe, M.; Pejler, G.; Hellman, L. Quantitative In-Depth Analysis of the Mouse Mast Cell Transcriptome Reveals Organ-Specific Mast Cell Heterogeneity. Cells 2020, 9, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, S.; Liu, J.; Min, Q.; Ikawa, T.; Yasuda, S.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Y.Q.; Tsubata, T.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, J.Y. Kelch-like protein 14 promotes B-1a but suppresses B-1b cell development. Int. Immunol. 2018, 30, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Prieto, J.M.B.; Felippe, M.J.B. Development, phenotype, and function of non-conventional B cells. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017, 54, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoshimoto, M. The ontogeny of murine B-1a cells. Int. J. Hematol. 2020, 111, 622–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hellman, L.; Smedsrod, B.; Sandberg, H.; Pettersson, U. Secretion of coagulant factor VIII activity and antigen by in vitro cultivated rat liver sinusoidal endothelial cells. Br. J. Haematol. 1989, 73, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johansson, S.; Rubin, K.; Hook, M.; Ahlgren, T.; Seljelid, R. In vitro biosynthesis of cold insoluble globulin (fibronectin) by mouse peritoneal macrophages. FEBS Lett. 1979, 105, 313–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cassado Ados, A.; D’Imperio Lima, M.R.; Bortoluci, K.R. Revisiting mouse peritoneal macrophages: Heterogeneity, development, and function. Front Immunol. 2015, 6, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Takenaka, E.; Van Vo, A.; Yamashita-Kanemaru, Y.; Shibuya, A.; Shibuya, K. Selective DNAM-1 expression on small peritoneal macrophages contributes to CD4(+) T cell costimulation. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 15180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goswami, D.G.; Rubio, A.J.; Mata, J.; Munoz, S.; Gallegos, A.; Walker, W.E. Large Peritoneal Macrophages and Transitional Premonocytes Promote Survival during Abdominal Sepsis. Immunohorizons 2021, 5, 994–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jorch, S.K.; Surewaard, B.G.; Hossain, M.; Peiseler, M.; Deppermann, C.; Deng, J.; Bogoslowski, A.; van der Wal, F.; Omri, A.; Hickey, M.J.; et al. Peritoneal GATA6+ macrophages function as a portal for Staphylococcus aureus dissemination. J. Clin. Investig. 2019, 129, 4643–4656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rojo, R.; Pridans, C.; Langlais, D.; Hume, D.A. Transcriptional mechanisms that control expression of the macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor locus. Clin. Sci. 2017, 131, 2161–2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1.
Gating strategy used for identification and sorting of peritoneal macrophages (i.e., CD19−, CD11b+, and F4/80+) and B cells (CD19+ and low FSC-A).
Figure 1.
Gating strategy used for identification and sorting of peritoneal macrophages (i.e., CD19−, CD11b+, and F4/80+) and B cells (CD19+ and low FSC-A).
Figure 2.
Purity of human peripheral blood monocytes obtained from PBMCs by magnetic cell sorting using CD14 microbeads. Separated cells were stained with anti-human CD14 PE antibody and analyzed by flow cytometry. Representative flow cytometry histograms show PBMCs before sorting (A) and cells after sorting (B).
Figure 2.
Purity of human peripheral blood monocytes obtained from PBMCs by magnetic cell sorting using CD14 microbeads. Separated cells were stained with anti-human CD14 PE antibody and analyzed by flow cytometry. Representative flow cytometry histograms show PBMCs before sorting (A) and cells after sorting (B).
Figure 3.
Signature gene sets identified for different MΦ subpopulations by previous single cell analysis. Transcript levels in the peritoneal MQs for a number of genes previously identified as signature transcripts for a few different MQ, monocyte, and dendritic cell populations by single cell analysis as summarized by Summers et al. [19]. The number of reads for each of the different genes are given in actual numbers we obtained from the Thermo Fisher Ampliseq analysis. The numbers in brackets are the numbers obtained from the GATC RNA-seq analysis. When the number or reads in one of these two studies are higher than 50 the transcript is marked in orange. When there is a major difference between the two analysis methods the RNA-seq value is marked by red text.
Figure 3.
Signature gene sets identified for different MΦ subpopulations by previous single cell analysis. Transcript levels in the peritoneal MQs for a number of genes previously identified as signature transcripts for a few different MQ, monocyte, and dendritic cell populations by single cell analysis as summarized by Summers et al. [19]. The number of reads for each of the different genes are given in actual numbers we obtained from the Thermo Fisher Ampliseq analysis. The numbers in brackets are the numbers obtained from the GATC RNA-seq analysis. When the number or reads in one of these two studies are higher than 50 the transcript is marked in orange. When there is a major difference between the two analysis methods the RNA-seq value is marked by red text.
Table 1.
Transcript levels for genes expressed in mouse peritoneal MΦs. The analysis highlights genes that are highly expressed in MΦs, genes that are selectively expressed in MΦs, and genes of particular biological relevance for MΦ function. The number of reads for each of the different proteins are given in actual numbers obtained from RNA-seq and Ampliseq analyses. In the RNA-seq analysis, the same transcript occasionally appeared several times due to the existence of splice variants. In these cases, the sum of the differential read values are presented within brackets. Genes for which we saw low or no expression in the MΦs, including defensins, cathelicidin, histidine-rich glycoprotein, histidine decarboxylase, and VEGFs, were added to the list as reference material. As a reference sample, we also included Ampliseq data for the same molecules from MACS-purified (anti-CD14) human peripheral blood monocytes. In cases where there were species-specific transcripts, mouse genes not found in the human genome or human genes not found in the mouse genome, these are marked with a short line.
Table 1.
Transcript levels for genes expressed in mouse peritoneal MΦs. The analysis highlights genes that are highly expressed in MΦs, genes that are selectively expressed in MΦs, and genes of particular biological relevance for MΦ function. The number of reads for each of the different proteins are given in actual numbers obtained from RNA-seq and Ampliseq analyses. In the RNA-seq analysis, the same transcript occasionally appeared several times due to the existence of splice variants. In these cases, the sum of the differential read values are presented within brackets. Genes for which we saw low or no expression in the MΦs, including defensins, cathelicidin, histidine-rich glycoprotein, histidine decarboxylase, and VEGFs, were added to the list as reference material. As a reference sample, we also included Ampliseq data for the same molecules from MACS-purified (anti-CD14) human peripheral blood monocytes. In cases where there were species-specific transcripts, mouse genes not found in the human genome or human genes not found in the mouse genome, these are marked with a short line.
| Mouse Peritoneal MΦs | H-Monocytes | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| RNA-Seq | Ampliseq | Ampliseq | |
| A. Amyloids and General Transcripts | |||
| Saa3 (serum amyloid, apolipoprotein) | 10,137 | 7412 | 0 |
| Saa1 (serum amyloid, apolipoprotein) | 9084 | 0 * | 0 |
| Saa2 (serum amyloid, apolipoprotein) | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Saa4 (serum amyloid, apolipoprotein) | 16 | 0 | 0 |
| Actb (beta actin) | 3425 | 7060 | 19,693 |
| Tcn2 (Transcobalmin) | (1027) | 5383 | 21 |
| Wfdc17 (WAP protein domain protein-activated MQ) | 4897 | 4064 | 0 |
| Tln1 (Talin 1 cytoskeletal membrane connector) | 370 | 1971 | 248 |
| Itsn1 (Intersectin 1 membrane trafficking) | (276) | 1359 | 0 |
| Grn (Granulin) | 1817 | 2744 | 588 |
| Bst1 (ADP-ribosyl cyclase 2) | 159 | 1204 | 100 |
| Gda (Guanine deaminase) | 523 | 1232 | 0 |
| Hamp (Hepsidin Iron import) | 148 | 876 | 1 |
| Ninj1 (Ninjurin 1 apoptosis signal?) | 390 | 1122 | 578 |
| Hal (Histidine ammonia lyase) | 335 | 1561 | 0 |
| Hdc (Histidine decarboxylase) | 21 | 42 | 0 |
| Hrg (Histidine rich glycoprotein) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| B. Extracellular Matrix | |||
| Fn1 (Fibronectin) | (10,119) | 25,920 | 0 |
| Prg4 (Proteoglycan 4, Lubricin) | 3921 | 3606 | 0 |
| Srgn (Serglycin-proteoglycan core protein) | 1022 | 2803 | 3855 |
| Sdc3 (Syndecan 3) | 873 | 3205 | 5 |
| Ecm1 (Extracellular matrix protein 1) | (1876) | 3180 | 1 |
| C. Antimicrobial Proteins | |||
| Lyz1 (M-Lysozyme) | 8354 | 791 | 27,394 |
| Lyz2 (P-Lysozyme) | 0 | 104,081 * | - |
| Defb (Beta-defensins) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Camp (Cathelicidin) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Cybb (Cytochr.b-245 (Nox2) Cytb558) | 1018 | 2664 | 1081 |
| Padi4 (Peptidyl arginine deiminase type IV) | 673 | 1029 | 77 |
| Flnb (Filamin B, fagocytosis) | (419) | 2235 | 9 |
| Flna (Filamin A) | (287) | 1458 | 1175 |
| Timd4 (Binds Phosphatidyl serine, apoptotic cells) | 933 | 1244 | 0 |
| D. Lipid Mediators and Metabolism | |||
| Alox1 (Arachinodate-15-lipoxygenase) | 4481 | 12,680 | 0 |
| Pla2g7 (Phosplipase A2) | 1325 | 1549 | 15 |
| Alox5ap (Arachinodate-5-lipoxygenase activating protein) | (1058) | 1296 | 111 |
| Ptgis (Prosaglandin I syntase) | 387 | 1283 | 0 |
| Alox5 (Arachinodate-5-lipoxygenase) | 178 | 494 | 190 |
| Dpep2 (Dipeptidase 2 membrane bound, incl. PGD4) | (360) | 1243 | 77 |
| ApoE (Apolipoprotein E) | (14,181) | 2413 | 2 |
| Pltp (Phospholipid transfer protein) | 2036 | 5788 | 1 |
| Plin2 (Perilipin2 cytopl. lipid droplet binding) | 426 | 1370 | 777 |
| Retnla (Resistin like alpha, cholesterol hom?) | 609 | 1223 | 0 |
| Smpdl3a (Sphingomyelin Phosphodiesterase acid-like 3) | 1103 | 2505 | 3 |
| Lipn (Lipase important for keratinocytes) | 34 | 11 | 11 |
| E. Complement Proteins and Their Receptors | |||
| Cfp (Complement factor P, Properdin) | 2941 | 5225 | 991 |
| C1qa (Complement factor C1q A) | 3661 | 4 * | 7 |
| C1qb (Complement factor C1q B) | 2123 | 3978 | 3 |
| C1qc (Complement factor C1q C) | 2127 | 128 * | 1 |
| C4b (Complement factor 4B) | 3087 | 2934 | 0.1 |
| C4a (Complement factor 4A) | 951 | 28 * | 1 |
| Cfh (Complement factor H) | 739 | 1980 | 0 |
| Fcna (Ficolin A) (human Ficolin 1, Fcn1) | 1428 | 1306 | 3198 |
| Vsig4 (V-Ig domain cont.4 Comp C3b rec) | 919 | 3123 | 5 |
| C3 (Complement factor 3) | 58 | 44 | 2 |
| CFB (Complement factor B) | 205 | 0 * | 0.2 |
| C2 (Complement factor 2) | 4 | 5 | 14 |
| C3ar1 (C3a receptor) | 139 | 290 | 41 |
| C5ar1 (C5a receptor 1) | (104) | 68 | 0 |
| F. Coagulation Proteins | |||
| F5 (Coagulation factor V) | 722 | 1582 | 40 |
| F10 (Coagulation factor X) | (266) | 508 | 0 |
| F7 (Coagulation factor VII) | 46 | 117 | 0 |
| F12 (Coagulation factor XII) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| F9 (Coagulation factor IX) | 0.1 | 0 | 0 |
| F2 (Thrombin) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| G. Proteases | |||
| Mmp19 (Matrix metalloprotease 19) | (18) | 81 | 1 |
| Mmp9 (Matrix metalloprotease 9) | 11 | 42 | 9 |
| Mmp27 (Matrix metalloprotease 27) | 6 | 10 | 0 |
| Mmp12 (Matrix metalloprotease 12) | 3 | 0.3 | 0 |
| H. Protease Inhibitors | |||
| Cst3 (Cystatin C) | 3497 | 5347 | 3704 |
| SLPI (Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor) | 1633 | 2355 | 0.4 |
| Serpinb2 (Serpin B2) | (915) | 1289 | 38 |
| Timp2 (Metalloproteinase Inhibitor 2) | 821 | 2135 | 283 |
| Timp1 (Metalloproteinase Inhibitor 1) | 0.1 | 0 | 725 |
| Serpinb9 (Serpin B9) | 6 | 13 | 111 |
| I. Lysosomal Proteins | |||
| Laptm5 (Lysosomal membrane protein 5) | 1938 | 6638 | 6180 |
| Psap (Prosaposin glycosphingolipids) | (2039) | 3559 | 12,296 |
| Man2b1 (Alpha-mannosidase) | 708 | 1621 | 5 |
| Ctsb (Cathepsin B) | 1175 | 4250 | 814 |
| Ctsd (Cathepsin D) | 3251 | 3595 | 1171 |
| Ctsl (Cathepsin L) | 451 | 2369 | 19 |
| Ctsa (Cathepsin A) | (652) | 2308 | 192 |
| Ctss (Cathepsin S) | (1575) | 1445 | 5290 |
| Ctsz (Cathepsin Z) | 360 | 571 | 1415 |
| Ctsh (Cathepsin H) | (116) | 316 | 329 |
| Ctsc (Cathepsin C) | 63 | 205 | 145 |
| Ctso (Cathepsin O) | 50 | 63 | 9 |
| Ctsf (Cathepsin F) | 48 | 53 | 1 |
| Ctse (Cathepsin E) | 21 | 76 | 0 |
| J. Immunoglobulin Receptors | |||
| FcgRIII (Fc gamma receptor 3) | 773 | 1968 | - |
| Fcgrt (FcRN) | 484 | 1786 | 380 |
| Fcgr4 (Fc gamma receptor 4) | 56 | 82 | - |
| Fcgr1 (Fc gamma receptor 1, high affinity) | 17 | 35 | 51 |
| Fcgr2b (Fc gamma receptor 2B, inhibiting) | (449) | 9 * | 59 |
| Fcgr2a (Fc gamma receptor 2A) | - | - | 580 |
| Fcer1g (Fc-epsilon receptor gamma, signaling) | 546 | 1318 | 1173 |
| K. MHC Classes I and II | |||
| B2m (beta-2 Microglobulin) | 3358 | 5791 | 5521 |
| H2-K1 (H2-K MHC Class I) | 0 * | 2606 | - |
| H2-D1 (H2-D MHC Class I) | 0 * | 973 | - |
| HLA-A | - | - | 1548 |
| HLA-B | - | - | 6 |
| HLA-C | - | - | 2979 |
| HLA-E | - | - | 2984 |
| HLA-DRB1 | - | - | 3023 |
| HLA-DRA | - | - | 5490 |
| HLA-DPA1 | - | - | 2375 |
| HLA-DPB1 | - | - | 1029 |
| HLA-DPB2 | - | - | 0 |
| HLA-DQB2 | - | - | 0 |
| HLA-DQA1 | - | - | 103 |
| HLA-DQA2 | - | - | 0 |
| H2-DMa (H2-DM alpha chain) | 0 * | 53 | - |
| H2-DMb2 | 0 * | 9 | - |
| H2-Aa (H2-IA) | 0 * | 52 | - |
| L. Classical Surface Receptors/Markers | |||
| CD14 | 560 | 627 | 1697 |
| CD40 | (25) | 79 | 6 |
| CD28 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| CD86 (B7-2) | 63 | 257 | 236 |
| CD80 (B7-1) | 27 | 10 | 2 |
| CD83 (Activation marker for dendritic cells) | (0.7) | 0.1 | 18 |
| CD244 (KIR2DL4) | 29 | 34 | 31 |
| CD84 (Ig superfamily, unknown function) | (244) | 31 | 20 |
| Mcemp1(Mast cell expressed membrane protein 1) | 425 | 1140 | 0 |
| CD209b (Receptor possibly involved in phagocytosis) | (227) | 1125 | 4 (CD209) |
| CD209a | 86 | 110 | - |
| CD5l (CD5 like very specific for MQ, bind CD36) | 558 | 892 | 0 |
| Adgre1 (F4/80, Emr1, GPCR mucin like) | 1178 | 373 | 87 |
| Retnla (Relma, Fizz1, suppresses TH2 responses) | 609 | 1223 | 30 |
| M. Scavenger Receptors | |||
| Marco (MARCO) | 16 | 28 | 1 |
| CD163 (Scavenger receptor, bind hemo-haptoglobin and complement) | 9 | 30 | 225 |
| CD36 (Scarb3) (Lung 1230) | 100 | 562 | 250 |
| CD68 (Binds oxidized LDL) | 425 | 638 | 1273 |
| CD177 | 9 | 15 | 0.3 |
| Scara3 and 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Scarb2 | 119 | 103 | 28 |
| Scarb1 | 10 | 51 | 22 |
| N. Cytokine, Chemokine, and Endothelin Receptors | |||
| Fgfr1 (FGF receptor 1) | (279) | 1429 | 0.1 |
| Csf1r (M-CSF receptor) | 678 | 1343 | 129 |
| Csf2ra (GM-CSF receptor alpha chain) | 277 | 838 | 47 |
| Csf3r (G-CSF receptor CD114) | (73) | 134 | 1236 |
| Ccr5 (CCR-5 receptor) | 76 | 119 | 2 |
| Ccr1 (CCR-1 receptor) | 228 | 91 | 34 |
| Tnfrsf1b (TNF receptor Subfamily 1b) | 66 | 399 | 1515 |
| Tnfrsf1a (TNF receptor Subfamily 1a) | 133 | 133 | 199 |
| Tnfrsf11a (TNF receptor Subfamily 11a) | 10 | 90 | 0.5 |
| Tnfrsf21 (TNF receptor Subfamily 21) | 28 | 80 | 25 |
| Tnfrsf14 (TNF receptor Subfamily 14) | 33 | 70 | 41 |
| Il10ra (IL-10 receptor alpha) | (67) | 280 | 609 |
| Il15ra (IL-15 receptor alpha) | (8) | 36 | 14 |
| Il6ra (IL-6 receptor alpha) | (86) | 34 | 80 |
| Il4ra (IL-4 receptor alpha) | 17 | 21 | 42 |
| IL3ra (IL-3 receptor alpha) | 21 | 17 | 8 |
| Il13ra1 (Il-13 receptor alpha1) | 13 | 10 | 123 |
| EGFR (EGF receptor HER1) | (2 | 6 | 0 |
| IL21r (IL-21 receptor) | 5 | 5 | 0 |
| IL27ra (IL-27 receptor alpha) | 14 | 5 | 32 |
| Il2rg (IL-2 receptor gamma) | (63) | 4 | 47 |
| Il2rb (IL-2 receptor beta) | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| Il1r1 (Receptor 1 for IL1 alpha) | (1) | 1.4 | 2 |
| Ednrb (Endothelin B receptor) | (1162) | 1402 | 0.2 |
| O. Toll-Like Receptors and Accessory Proteins | |||
| Tlr4 (TLR-4) | 29 | 200 | 24 |
| Ly96 (MD2 LPS binding together with TLR4) | (74) | 30 | 8 |
| Tlr13 (TLR-13) | 137 | 108 | 0? |
| Tlr7 (TLR-7) | (49) | 84 | 9 |
| Tlr1 (TLR-1) | (25) | 71 | 6 |
| Tlr8 (TLR-8) | (57) | 65 | 46 |
| Tlr2 (TLR-2) | 43 | 26 | 40 |
| Tlr3 (TLR-3) | 8 | 18 | 0 |
| Tlr6 (TLR-6) | 18 | 3 | 2 |
| Nlrc4 (Inflammasome related) | 12 | 15 | 4 |
| P. Cell Adhesion | |||
| Itgam (Integrin alpha m, CD11b) | (2100) | 11,106 | 245 |
| Itga6 (Integrin alpha 6) | (751) | 4519 | 0 |
| Itgb2 (Integrin beta 2) | 1602 | 3683 | 1975 |
| Itgb1(Integrin beta 1) | 718 | 1253 | 161 |
| Itga4 (Integrin alpha 4) | 86 | 393 | 230 |
| Itgb7 (Integrin beta 7) | 49 | 17 | 0? |
| Itgav (Integrin alpha v) | 14 | 31 | 2 |
| Itga9 (Integrin alpha 9) | 12 | 39 | 2 |
| Itgb3 (Integrin beta 3) | 11 | 30 | 3 |
| Itgax (Integrin alpha x, CD11c) | 0.2 | 1 | 249 |
| Selp (P-selectin) | 679 | 3123 | 0 |
| Emilin2 (Elastin microfibril located protein 2) | 1123 | 2777 | 162 |
| Icam2 (ICAM 2) | 672 | 1092 | 39 |
| Lgals3 (Galectin3, MAC2) | 0 | 167 | 249 |
| Q. Chemokines and Cytokines | |||
| Pf4 (Platelet factor 4) | 1437 | 3583 | 3 |
| Ccl6 (Member of MIP-1 family) | 1500 | 2616 | - |
| Ccl9 (Also named MIP-1 gamma) | 332 | 3013 | 0 |
| Cxcl13 (B-cell attracting (BCA-1) | 1253 | 1456 | 0 |
| Ccl24 (Eotaxin-2 or MPIF-2) | 480 | 707 | 1 |
| Cxcl16 (T-cell and NK-cell attracting) | 0 | 73 | 307 |
| Cxcl14 (Attracting activated NK cells) | 25 | 47 | 0 |
| Cxcl2 (Also named MIP2 alpha) | 42 | 22 | 12 |
| Cxcl1 (Neutrophil attractant (Gro-a or NAP-3)) | 27 | 19 | 4 |
| Cxcl12 (also named SDF1) | (30) | 16 | 0 |
| Ccl5 (Rantes attracts T-cells, Eosinophils and Basophils) | 3 | 6 | 8 |
| Ccl11 (Eotaxin 1) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tgfb2 (TGF-beta 2) | (256) | 1005 | 0.1 |
| Tgfb1 (TGF-beta 1) | 166 | 650 | 918 |
| Il16 (IL-16) | 19 | 71 | 0 |
| Csf1 (M-CSF, expressed low in most tissues) | (8) | 44 | 6 |
| IL18 (IL-18) | 18 | 38 | 58 |
| Il18bp (IL-18 binding protein) | 20 | 28 | 6 |
| IL1a (IL-1 alpha) | 14 | 31 | 0.2 |
| Il15 (IL-15) | (6) | 16 | 6 |
| IL27 (IL-27) | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| Il13 (IL-13) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Il12a and b (IL-12a and b) | 0 | 0 | 1 and 0 |
| Tnf (TNF-alpha) | 1 | 0.1 | 131 |
| Igf1 (IGF-1) | 11 | 80 | 0 |
| Egf (EGF) | 0.4 | 2 | 0 |
| Pdgfa (PDGF-A) | 5 | 10 | 0.4 |
| Pdgfb (PDGF-B) | 6 | 4 | 0.2 |
| Vegfa (VEGF-A) | 0 | 0 | 183 |
| Vegfb (VEGF-B) | 4 | 1.3 | 11 |
| Vegfd (VEGF-D) | 0 | 0 | 0? |
| R. Signaling Components | |||
| Tyrobp (TYRO protein kinase-binding protein, Myeloid) | 1504 | 2028 | 4617 |
| Dab2 (Disabled homolog 2) | (146) | 1413 | 1 |
| Pde2a (cGMP-dependent cyclic phosphodiesterase) | (228) | 1362 | 5 |
| Slfn4 (Schlafen 4-myeloid signaling) | (361) | 1322 | 0? |
| Btk | 59 | 52 | 50 |
| S. Transcription Factors | |||
| Gata6 (GATA-6) | 83 | 68 | 0 |
| Gata3 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.3 |
| Gata2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Gata1 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 |
| Mitf | (15) | 36 | 4 |
| Spi1 (Pu.1) | 228 | 536 | 1307 |
| Myb | 0.1 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Runx1 | (9) | 139 | 42 |
| Runx3 | 6 | 7 | 166 |
| Creb3l1 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Zeb2 (Zinc finger corepressor) | (100) | 939 | 242 |
| Tox2 | 46 | 78 | 0.3 |
| Ikzf1 (Ikaros, Zinc finger transcription factor) | 8 | 16 | 54 |
| Foxp3 | 5 | 0.5 | 1 |
* Values that we are skeptical about and do not think they are correct due to the limitations of the particular technology as described in the text.
Table 2.
Expression of pattern recognition- and angiogenesis-related proteins in mouse MΦs, mast cells and B-cells, and human monocytes. The number of reads for each of the different transcripts are given in actual numbers obtained from the Ampliseq analysis. To this table we also added the results from an Ampliseq analysis of unstimulated freshly isolated human peripheral blood monocytes from one individual (monocytes). The results from this individual and four additional individuals are shown in Supplementary Materials Table S1. The B cells we analyzed are a clearly separate population of CD19 high and forward scatter low population of cells with medium–high CD11b (193 reads) and low CD5 (7 reads) levels of B cells, which based on these expression levels may represent B1b cells [24,25,26].
Table 2.
Expression of pattern recognition- and angiogenesis-related proteins in mouse MΦs, mast cells and B-cells, and human monocytes. The number of reads for each of the different transcripts are given in actual numbers obtained from the Ampliseq analysis. To this table we also added the results from an Ampliseq analysis of unstimulated freshly isolated human peripheral blood monocytes from one individual (monocytes). The results from this individual and four additional individuals are shown in Supplementary Materials Table S1. The B cells we analyzed are a clearly separate population of CD19 high and forward scatter low population of cells with medium–high CD11b (193 reads) and low CD5 (7 reads) levels of B cells, which based on these expression levels may represent B1b cells [24,25,26].
| Mouse Balb/c Mice | Human | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MΦs | Mast Cells | B-Cells | Monocytes | |
| A. TLR Rig-1 and MDA5 | ||||
| Rig-1 (Ddx58) | 27 | 44 | 104 | 3 |
| MDA5 (Ifih1) | 58 | 42 | 10 | 4 |
| TLR-4 | 200 | 61 | 26 | 24 |
| TLR-13 | 108 | 13 | 3 | - |
| TLR-9 | 0.4 | 12 | 251 | 1 |
| TLR-11 | 0 | 9 | 0 | - |
| TLR-7 | 84 | 5 | 38 | 9 |
| TLR-3 lung (41) | 18 | 5 | 3 | 0 |
| TLR-1 | 71 | 4 | 151 | 6 |
| TLR-8 | 65 | 4 | 1 | 46 |
| TLR-12 | 0.2 | 3 | 15 | - |
| TLR-6 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| TLR-2 | 26 | 2 | 10 | 40 |
| TLR-5 lung (10) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 18 |
| Dectin-1 (Clec7a) | 261 | 11 | 2 | 142 |
| Ccl5 lung (130) | 6 | 43 | 15 | 8 |
| B. Angiogenesis related transcripts | ||||
| Vegfa lung (350) | 0 | 65 | 0 | 183 |
| Vegfb | 1 | 35 | 6 | 11 |
| Vegfc | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Vegfd lung (92) | 0 | 1 | 0 | - |
| Angpt1 (Angiopoetin 1) | 0 | 72 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Angpt2 (Angiopoetin 2) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 3.
Transcript levels in the mouse liver. The analysis highlights genes that are highly expressed in liver, genes that are selectively expressed in liver, and genes of particular biological relevance for liver function. The number of reads for each of the different transcripts are given in actual numbers obtained from Ampliseq analysis. The same sample was analyzed twice, and the results from both analyses are depicted.
Table 3.
Transcript levels in the mouse liver. The analysis highlights genes that are highly expressed in liver, genes that are selectively expressed in liver, and genes of particular biological relevance for liver function. The number of reads for each of the different transcripts are given in actual numbers obtained from Ampliseq analysis. The same sample was analyzed twice, and the results from both analyses are depicted.
| Ampliseq | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analysis 1 | Analysis 2 | |
| A. Major Liver-Specific Transcripts | ||
| Alb (Albumin, the major plasma protein) | 59,900 | 61,827 |
| Ashg (Alpha 2-HS glycoprotein/fetuin) | 14,707 | 14,423 |
| Hpx (Hemopexin bind heme) | 5626 | 5520 |
| Pzp (Pregnancy zone protein, alpha-2 globin family) | 3975 | 3902 |
| Ambp (Alpha-1-microglobulin) | 3702 | 3830 |
| Gnmt (Glycine-N-methyltransferase) | 2386 | 2501 |
| Vtn1 (Vitronectin) | 2677 | 2721 |
| Fn1 (Fibronectin) | 925 | 1018 |
| Hrg (Histidine-rich glycoprotein) | 934 | 810 |
| Akr1c6 (Aldo-keto reductase) | 457 | 516 |
| Akr1c14 (Alcohol dehydrogenase) | 453 | 421 |
| Tfr2 (Transferrin receptor 2) | 439 | 451 |
| Agt (Angiotensin precursor) | 448 | 509 |
| Hpn (Hepsin, a serine protease) (Kidney 370) | 431 | 460 |
| Tdo2 (Tryptophane 2,3-dioxygenase) | 430 | 396 |
| Afm (Afamin albumin related) | 381 | 377 |
| Sult2a2 (Sulfotransferase family 2A drug metabolism) | 302 | 282 |
| Sds (Serine dehydrase, serine metabolism) | 292 | 303 |
| Cp (Ceruloplasmin copper-carrying protein) | 288 | 247 |
| Dpys (Dihydropyrimidase pyrimidine metabolism) | 272 | 270 |
| Saa4 (Serum amyloid, apolipoprotein) | 233 | 227 |
| Apcs (Serum amyloid P component) | 60 | 52 |
| Msp1 (Macrophage stimulatory protein, also HLP) | 323 | 251 |
| Mup20 (Major urinary protein) | 226 | 218 |
| Cyp2c54 (Cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily C) | 225 | 228 |
| Amdhd1 (Imidazolonepropionase histidine metabolism) | 222 | 246 |
| Ugt2a3 (UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A3) | 218 | 217 |
| Sult2a1 (Bile salt sulfotransferase) | 176 | 172 |
| Gckr (Glucokinase regulatory protein) | 175 | 180 |
| Fmo3 (Flavo containing mono-oxidase 3) | 175 | 177 |
| Asgr2 (Asialoglycoprotein receptor, galactose) | 174 | 170 |
| Baat (Bile acid-CoA amino acid N-acyl transferase) | 172 | 159 |
| Lyz2 (P-Lysozyme, probably Lyz1 instead) | 160 | 155 |
| Prodh2 (Hydroxyproline dehydrogenase) | 144 | 146 |
| Clec4f (Kupffer cell galactose receptor lectin) | 121 | 115 |
| Gfra1 (GDNF family receptor alpha 1) | 111 | 113 |
| Inhbc (Inhibin beta C-chain TGF-beta family) | 100 | 103 |
| Cpn2 (Carboxypeptidase N) | 83 | 89 |
| Gck (Glucokinase senses glucose levels) | 83 | 87 |
| Gys2 (Glycogene syntase) | 79 | 82 |
| Fgfr4 (FGF receptor 4) | 58 | 54 |
| Oit3 (Oncoprotein-induced transcript 3) | 54 | 64 |
| A1bg (Alpha-1-B glycoprotein) | 40 | 46 |
| Inhbe (Inhibin beta E chain precursor, TGF family) | 39 | 43 |
| Dnase2b (DNAse 2 beta) | 37 | 41 |
| Igfals (IGF-binding factor, stabilizes IGF in plasma) | 31 | 33 |
| Gdf2 (Bone morphogenic protein BMP-9) | 30 | 29 |
| Fgf21 (FGF-21 hepatokine, regulates sugar intake) | 24 | 29 |
| Il6ra (IL-6 receptor alpha) | 21 | 21 |
| Bmp5 (BMP-5, Bone morphogenic protein 5) | 21 | 24 |
| Thpo (Thrombopoietin regulates platelet production) | 20 | 22 |
| Bco1 (beta carotene metabolism) | 20 | 20 |
| Saa3 (Amyloid) | 2.9 | 2.0 |
| B. Lipid Metabolism and Transport | ||
| Scd (Stearoyl CoA desaturase) | 20,132 | 21,369 |
| Fabp1 (Fatty-acid-binding protein) | 15,683 | 16,162 |
| Apoa1 (Apolipoprotein A1, major part of HDL) | 15,093 | 15,512 |
| Apoa2 (Apolipoprotein A1, part of HDL) | 14,210 | 12,233 |
| Apoc1 (Apolipoprotein C1, can be part of HDL) | 12,723 | 12,195 |
| Ttr (Transthyretin, transport thyroxin and retinol) | 12,443 | 11,201 |
| Gc (Gc-globin, vitamin D-binding protein) | 9852 | 9765 |
| Apoc3 (Apolipoprotein C3, can be part of VLDL) | 9755 | 10,184 |
| Rbp4 (Retinol-binding protein) | 6483 | 6138 |
| ApoE (Apolipoprotein E, transport lipids) | 2445 | 2353 |
| Sec14l4 (Sec14-like lipid binding 4, transport) | 260 | 251 |
| C. Protease Inhibitors | ||
| Serpinc1 (Serpin C1) | 4809 | 4845 |
| Fetub (Fetuin b, Cystein protease inhibitor) | 618 | 592 |
| Itih1 (Inter alpha-trypsin inhibitor 1) | 400 | 398 |
| Itih3 (Inter alpha-trypsin inhibitor 3) | 250 | 244 |
| Serpina7 (Serpin A7) | 42 | 46 |
| D. Coagulation Factors | ||
| Fgb) Fibrinogen beta) | 7718 | 7474 |
| Fga (Fibrinogen alpha) | 4817 | 5144 |
| Fgg (Fibrinogen gamma) | 2540 | 2538 |
| F2 (Thrombin) | 3089 | 3507 |
| F10 (Coagulation factor X) | 1007 | 1144 |
| Cpb2 (Carboxypeptidase B2, downregulates fibrinolysis) | 664 | 641 |
| F5 (Coagulation factor V) | 522 | 527 |
| Fgl1 (Fibrinogen-like protein 1) | 452 | 476 |
| F12 (Coagulation factor XII) | 450 | 458 |
| F13b (Coagulation factor XIII-B) | 326 | 315 |
| F7 (Coagulation factor VII) | 150 | 142 |
| F9 (Coagulation factor IX) | 90 | 96 |
| F11 (Coagulation factor XI) | 57 | 49 |
| F8 (Coagulation factor 8, Kidney (3 and 4), Uterus 16) | 17 | 19 |
| E. Complement Factors | ||
| C3 (Complement factor 3) | 5114 | 3902 |
| Cfh (Complement factor H) | 1231 | 1221 |
| C4b (Complement factor 4B) | 777 | 889 |
| C4a (Complement factor 4A) | 26 * | 24 * |
| Cfi (Complement factor I) | 530 | 472 |
| Cfhr1 (Complement factor H-related protein) | 167 | 172 |
| C4bp (C4 binding protein regulatory) | 735 | 671 |
| C8g (Complement factor 8g) | 393 | 398 |
| Hc (Hemolytic component same as C5) | 345 | 298 |
| Crp (C-Reactive protein) | 428 | 433 |
| C1rl (C1r protease) | 232 | 245 |
| C1qbp (C1q binding protein) | 209 | 203 |
| C8b (Complement factor 8 beta chain) | 127 | 119 |
| C9 (Complement component 9) | 119 | 114 |
| C8a (Complement factor 8 alpha chain) | 74 | 44 |
| C1qb (Complement factor C1q beta chain) | 52 | 31 |
| C2 (Complement factor 2) | 51 | 51 |
| Fcna (Ficolin) | 40 | 46 |
| Cfp (Properdin) | 30 | 31 |
* Indicates values that we are skeptical about and do not think they are correct due to the limitations of the particular technology as described in the text.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Paivandy, A.; Akula, S.; Lara, S.; Fu, Z.; Olsson, A.-K.; Kleinau, S.; Pejler, G.; Hellman, L. Quantitative In-Depth Transcriptome Analysis Implicates Peritoneal Macrophages as Important Players in the Complement and Coagulation Systems. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031185
AMA Style
Paivandy A, Akula S, Lara S, Fu Z, Olsson A-K, Kleinau S, Pejler G, Hellman L. Quantitative In-Depth Transcriptome Analysis Implicates Peritoneal Macrophages as Important Players in the Complement and Coagulation Systems. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(3):1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031185
Chicago/Turabian StylePaivandy, Aida, Srinivas Akula, Sandra Lara, Zhirong Fu, Anna-Karin Olsson, Sandra Kleinau, Gunnar Pejler, and Lars Hellman. 2022. "Quantitative In-Depth Transcriptome Analysis Implicates Peritoneal Macrophages as Important Players in the Complement and Coagulation Systems" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 3: 1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031185
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
