Next Article in Journal
Microfabrication of a Chamber for High-Resolution, In Situ Imaging of the Whole Root for Plant–Microbe Interactions
Previous Article in Journal
Platelet Innate Immune Receptors and TLRs: A Double-Edged Sword
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 15
10.3390/ijms22157895
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

SmSPL6 Induces Phenolic Acid Biosynthesis and Affects Root Development in Salvia miltiorrhiza

by
Yao Cao
†,
Rui Chen
†,
Wen-Tao Wang
,
Dong-Hao Wang
* and
Xiao-Yan Cao
*
Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Medicinal Resources and Natural Pharmaceutical Chemistry, National Engineering Laboratory for Resource Development of Endangered Crude Drugs in Northwest of China, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(15), 7895; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22157895
Submission received: 23 June 2021 / Revised: 19 July 2021 / Accepted: 19 July 2021 / Published: 23 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Salvia miltiorrhiza is a renowned model medicinal plant species for which 15 SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE (SPL) family genes have been identified; however, the specific functions of SmSPLs have not been well characterized as of yet. For this study, the expression patterns of SmSPL6 were determined through its responses to treatments of exogenous hormones, including indole acetic acid (IAA), gibberellic acid (GA3), methyl jasmonic acid (MeJA), and abscisic acid (ABA). To characterize its functionality, we obtained SmSPL6-ovexpressed transgenic S. miltiorrhiza plants and found that overexpressed SmSPL6 promoted the accumulation of phenolic acids and repressed the biosynthesis of anthocyanin. Meanwhile, the root lengths of the SmSPL6-overexpressed lines were significantly longer than the control; however, both the fresh weights and lateral root numbers decreased. Further investigations indicated that SmSPL6 regulated the biosynthesis of phenolic acid by directly binding to the promoter regions of the enzyme genes Sm4CL9 and SmCYP98A14 and activated their expression. We concluded that SmSPL6 regulates not only the biosynthesis of phenolic acids, but also the development of roots in S. miltiorrhiza.

1. Introduction

Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge, which belongs to the Labiatae family, is a significant medicinal plant [1]. Its dried roots (referred to as Danshen in Chinese), in combination with other herbs, have been used extensively for many years to treat various conditions [2], including cardiovascular diseases [3,4], menstrual disorders [5], inflammation prevention [6], hepatocirrhosis [7], as an anti-osteoporotic [2], and so on. Many capsules, dripping pills, injection solutions, and tablets used in clinical applications are comprised of Danshen. S. miltiorrhiza contains diverse chemical components, encompassing approximately 50 diterpenoid quinones, more than 30 hydrophilic phenolic acids, and several essential oil constituents. According to pharmacological investigations, lipid-soluble tanshinones and water-soluble phenolic acids are the main active ingredients of S. miltiorrhiza [1,8].
The biological activities of lipid-soluble tanshinones, such as tanshinone and tanshinol A, include cardio-cerebrovascular protection and serve as anticancer and anti-inflammatory agents [9]. Hydrophilic phenolic acids, such as salvianolic acid B (SalB) and rosmarinic acid (RA), have potent anti-oxidative, anti-coagulation, and anti-inflammatory properties [10]. As the main active ingredient of phenolic acids, SalB is designated as a primary component of Danshen in the official Chinese Pharmacopoeia [11]. In S. miltiorrhiza, the biosynthesis of RA and SalB originates from phenylpropanoid and tyrosine-derived pathways [12]. The phenylpropanoid pathway includes three key enzymes, namely phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H), and 4-coumarate-CoA ligase (4CL). For the tyrosine-derived pathway, 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate reductase (HPPR) and tyrosine aminotransferase (TAT) are the key enzymes. Furthermore, rosmarinic acid synthase (RAS) and cytochrome P450 monooxygenase C3′H (CYP98A14) catalyze the biosynthesis of RA and SalB [13,14,15]. Many reports have indicated that several transcription factors participate in the regulation of phenolic acid accumulation in S. miltiorrhiza. For instance, SmbHLH3 is a negative regulatory factor in the biosynthesis of phenolic acids [16]. In contrast, the expression of SmMYB111 can positively regulate the accumulation of phenolic acids [17].
The SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE (SPL) transcription factor family is characterized by a highly conserved SBP-box domain, which plays important roles in plant growth and development [18]. The SBP-box domain consists of 76 amino acids that contain two zinc finger sites, which specifically bind to the GTAC core motif [19]. SPL genes have been widely investigated in many plants. There are 16 SPL genes in Arabidopsis thaliana [19], 18 SPL genes in Betula luminifera [20], 19 SPLs in rice [21], and 15 SPLs have been identified for S. miltiorrhiza [22].
In Arabidopsis, the functions of SPL genes have been thoroughly investigated. Most SPLs are miR156 targets, which is conserved and age-regulated in microRNA. The miR156-SPL regulatory module controls multiple developmental processes, including the juvenile-to-adult phase transition [23], flower formation [24], and root development [25,26,27]. It has been reported that AtSPL9 and AtSPL15 mediate lateral bud growth and branching [28]. AtSPL9 might interact with DELLA proteins (GA signaling pathway repressors) to promote the initiation of Arabidopsis axillary buds [29,30]. AtSPL9 also interacts with JAZ proteins and contributes to insect resistance in young plants [31], whereas AtSPL9 is involved in controlling the innate immunity of A. thaliana [32]. Furthermore, AtSPL9 prevents the expression of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes from down-regulating anthocyanin accumulation by directly interfering with the formation of a MYB-bHLH-WD40 transcriptional complex [33].
Although 15 members of the SPL family have been identified in S. miltiorrhiza [22], none of these have been functionally experimentally characterized to date. According to phylogenetic tree analysis, S. miltiorrhiza SPL6 (SmSPL6) and AtSPL9 tend to cluster in the same subgroup [22]. We speculated as to whether SmSPL6 might be involved in the accumulation of active ingredients in S. miltiorrhiza. To investigate the functionality of SmSPL6, we characterized its expression patterns and gain-of-function phenotype. Here, we found that SmSPL6 responded to treatments with the exogenous hormones indole acetic acid (IAA), gibberellic acid (GA3), methyl jasmonic acid (MeJA), and abscisic acid (ABA). The overexpression of SmSPL6 promoted the accumulation of RA and SalB by directly binding to the promoter regions of SmCYP98A14 and Sm4CL9 and activating their expression. Meanwhile, SmSPL6 repressed the biosynthesis of anthocyanins and altered the phenotype of root systems. All of the results indicated that SmSPL6 is a strong regulator of both secondary metabolites and root development.

2. Results

2.1. Expression Patterns of SmSPL6 in S. miltiorrhiza

To investigate the expression patterns of SmSPL6, we extracted RNA from different tissues of 2-year-old S. miltiorrhiza and converted the RNA into cDNA for quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis. The results indicated that SmSPL6 was expressed in all detected tissues of S. miltiorrhiza, with the highest expression level in the upper leaves (Figure 1A). We analyzed the promoter fragment of SmSPL6 by PlantCARE and found cis-elements in response to IAA, GA3, and ABA (Table 1). In addition, the MeJA was also used to treat the S. miltiorrhiza plantlets. The results of qRT-PCR revealed that SmSPL6 responded to IAA, GA3, MeJA, and ABA treatments. Exogenous IAA, ABA, or MeJA treatments significantly repressed the expression of SmSPL6 (Figure 1B).
To further examine the spatial expression patterns of SmSPL6, we constructed the 862 bp promoter region of SmSPL6 into the pCAMBIA1391z to generate ProSmSPL6::GUS transgenic Arabidopsis plants and performed GUS histochemical staining. We observed a strong GUS signal for both the reproductive period and vegetative phase of Arabidopsis (Figure 2). However, no GUS signals were observed in the root tips (Figure 2A–C) or newly formed lateral roots (Figure 2B).

2.2. SmSPL6 Is Located in the Nucleus and Is Involved in Transcriptional Activation

To determine the subcellular localization of SmSPL6, the open reading frame (ORF) of SmSPL6 was cloned and fused to a green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter gene, driven by the 35S promoter of the cauliflower mosaic virus. 35Spro::SmSPL6-GFP was transiently expressed in the onion epidermis and 35Spro::GFP was employed as a positive control. The GFP signal indicated that the SmSPL6 was specifically localized within the nucleus (Figure 3A), which was consistent with our expectation.
Furthermore, the recombinant vector pGBKT7-SmSPL6 was transformed into the yeast strain AH109 for analyzing the transcriptional activation activities of SmSPL6. Yeast containing the pGBKT7-SmSPL6 or the negative control plasmid pGBKT7 grew well on the SD/-Trp solid medium; however, only the former grew normally on the SD/-Trp/-His/-Ade solid medium with X-α-gal and turned blue (Figure 3B). These results indicated that SmSPL6 has transcriptional activation activity, and that SmSPL6 is a functional transcription factor.

2.3. Generation of SmSPL6-Overexpressed Transgenic S. miltiorrhiza

To characterize the functionality of the SmSPL6 in S. miltiorrhiza, SmSPL6-overexpressed (OE) transgenic S. miltiorrhiza plants were obtained via the EHA105-mediated leaf disc transformation method. Nine independent SmSPL6-OE lines were verified through the presence of a sequence of 1833 bp that contained a CaMV 35S promoter and SmSPL6 (Figure 4A). The SmSPL6 expression levels in the control and SmSPL6-OE lines were analyzed (Figure 4B). We observed that OE5, OE6, and OE8 showed higher expression levels than the other OE lines; thus, they were selected for further analysis.
Subsequently, we observed the root phenotypes of 2-month-old SmSPL6-OE lines and a control. The lateral root numbers and fresh weight of the OE5, OE6, and OE8 transgenic lines were decreased; however, the lengths and diameters were increased in contrast to the control. These results revealed that the overexpression of SmSPL6 affected the root phenotype of S. miltiorrhiza (Figure 4C, Table 2).

2.4. SmSPL6 Represses the Accumulation of Anthocyanin

Since phylogenetic tree analysis indicated that SmSPL6 tended to cluster with AtSPL9 [22], which involves anthocyanin accumulation [33], we quantified the content of anthocyanin in the SmSPL6-OE lines and the control (Figure 5A). As anticipated, the content of total anthocyanin in the SmSPL6-OE lines (OE5, OE6, and OE8) was lower than that of the control (Figure 5B). Among the three transgenic lines, OE5 and OE8 showed significant differences. The results indicated that SmSPL6 repressed the accumulation of anthocyanin in S. miltiorrhiza.
We further determined the expression levels of the key enzyme genes CHALCONE SYNTHASE (CHS), FLAVANONE 3-HYDROXYLASE (F3H), FLAVONOID 3′-HYDROXYLASE (F3′H), ANTHOCYANIDIN SYNTHASE (ANS), and DIHYDROFLAVONOL REDUCTASE (DFR) of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway in the transgenic lines, with the results showing that overexpressed SmSPL6 could inhibit their transcription (Figure 5C).

2.5. SmSPL6 Positively Regulates the Biosynthesis of RA and SalB

RA and SalB are the main active ingredients of S. miltiorrhiza. We determined the contents of RA and SalB using the HPLC method in the SmSPL6-OE lines (OE5, OE6, and OE8). The results revealed that the contents of RA and SalB were significantly increased, both in the whole plantlets and in the roots of the SmSPL6-OE lines, among which the OE5 line had the largest fold change (Figure 6). The contents of RA in the whole plantlets of OE5, OE6, and OE8 were 1.39, 1.29, and 1.14 times that of the control, respectively, and those of SalB were 3.69, 2.64, and 2.39 times that of the control, respectively. In the roots, the fold changes of RA in OE5, OE6, and OE8 were 2.36, 1.96, and 1.21 times that of the control, respectively, and those of SalB were 8.19, 7.47, and 5.18 times, respectively. These results indicated that SmSPL6 is a positive regulator for the biosynthesis of RA and SalB, particularly in the roots.
We detected the expression levels of enzyme genes involved in the phenolic acid biosynthesis pathway in the roots (Figure 7A). Our qRT-PCR results indicated that most of these genes, including SmHPPR1, SmHPPR2, SmHPPR3, Sm4CL1, Sm4CL9, SmRAS2, SmRAS4, and SmCYP98A14, were significantly up-regulated (Figure 7B), particularly the expression level of Sm4CL9, which showed the largest fold change in every OE line.

2.6. SmSPL6 Binds Directly to the Promoter of SmCYP98A14 and Sm4CL9

It was reported that SPLs can regulate the expression of target genes by directly binding to the GTAC motif of target genes [19]. We found that the GTAC motif existed in the promoter regions of Sm4CL9 and SmCYP98A14 (Figure 8A). A yeast one-hybrid (Y1H) assay was performed to examine the physical interactions between the SmSPL6 and the promoter regions of Sm4CL9 and SmCYP98A14. Our results indicated that SmSPL6 could bind to the promoter regions of the two genes (Figure 8B). In addition, a dual-luciferase transient transcriptional assay was performed to investigate whether SmSPL6 might activate/regulate the expressions of SmCYP98A14 and Sm4CL9, with the results indicating that it did (Figure 8D). These findings confirmed that SmSPL6 binds directly to and activates the promoters of SmCYP98A14 and Sm4CL9 to promote the biosynthesis of RA and SalB.

3. Discussion

3.1. Function of SmSPL6 in Phenolic Acid Biosynthesis

Phenolic acids are an intense area of research in the secondary metabolism of S. miltiorrhiza. Previous reports have shown that several elicitors influence the production of phenolic acids [34]. These elicitors can be divided into two groups (biotic and abiotic), with the former containing both pathogenic and plant cell components [35,36], and the latter including Ag+ [37], MeJA [6], SA [38], etc. Elicitors can affect phenolic acid compounds via transcription factors, which activate or repress the expression of enzyme genes that are engaged in the phenolic acid biosynthetic pathway. It was reported that some MeJA-responsive transcription factors, such as SmMYB97 [39], SmMYB1 [40], SmMYB111 [17], SmbHLH148 [41], and SmERF1L1 [42], regulated the biosynthesis of phenolic acids via binding directly to and activating the promoters of enzyme-encoding genes involved in the biosynthetic pathway. For instance, SmMYB1 positively regulates the biosynthesis of SalB by directly activating the key enzyme gene SmCYP98A14 [40].
We found that SmSPL6 responded to the treatment of exogenous MeJA (Figure 1B). Besides AtSPL9, the homeotic gene of SmSPL6 is involved in the regulation of secondary metabolites [35]. We speculated that SmSPL6 could be a candidate transcription factor for regulating the accumulation of phenolic acids in S. miltiorrhiza. To investigate whether SmSPL6 mediates the biosynthesis of phenolic acid, we generated SmSPL6-overexpressed transgenic S. miltiorrhiza plants. The concentrations of RA and SalB were significantly increased in the transgenic lines. Y1H and dual-luciferase assays indicated that SmSPL6 could bind to the promoters of the key enzyme genes SmCYP98A14 and Sm4CL9 and activate their expression (Figure 8). In this research, our findings demonstrated that SmSPL6 was responsible for the generation of phenolic acid by directly activating the transcription of SmCYP98A14 and Sm4CL9 in S. miltiorrhiza.

3.2. Function of SmSPL6 in Anthocyanin Biosynthesis

Flavonoid-type anthocyanin is a critical type of secondary metabolite that can control plant fertility and protect plants from environmental stresses [43,44,45]. It is also beneficial for human health due to its antioxidant, anti-cancer activities and anti-inflammatory function [46,47]. Previous studies indicated that AtSPL9 negatively regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis by disrupting the stability of the MYB-bHLH-WD40 transcription complex [33]. Meanwhile, AtSPL9 directly regulates the expression of DFR (the key enzyme gene for anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway) to influence the metabolism of anthocyanin [33]. We detected the content of anthocyanin in the SmSPL6-OE transgenic lines and the control. Our results showed that overexpressed SmSPL6 reduced the accumulation of anthocyanin in S. miltiorrhiza (Figure 5), which was consistent with the function of AtSPL9 in regulating the production of anthocyanin. The expression levels of enzyme-encoding genes for the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway were all down-regulated in the SmSPL6-OE lines (Figure 5C). We analyzed the promoter regions of those genes and found that the GTAC motif existed in the promoter regions of CHS, F3H, F3′H, DFR, and ANS (data not shown). Whether SmSPL6 regulates the expression of these genes by directly binding to the GTAC motif will be investigated in our future studies.
Water-soluble phenolic acids and anthocyanin share a common phenylpropanoid pathway. Previous literature indicated that the positive regulators of phenolic acids may have different roles to play in the production of anthocyanin. For instance, overexpressed SmMYB1 significantly promoted the accumulation of anthocyanin [40], while overexpressed SmbHLH51 did not significantly alter anthocyanin generation [48]. Our results indicated that SmSPL6 was a positive regulator for phenolic acids, but a negative regulator for anthocyanin, revealing that the regulatory mechanisms of secondary metabolites in plants is quite complex.

3.3. Function of SmSPL6 in Root Development

Root systems are essential for plant growth and survival due to their critical roles in the acquisition of water and nutrients. As is well known, the dried roots of S. miltiorrhiza are used as a traditional Chinese medicine; thus, improving the biomass and quality of roots is an important goal for the breeding of S. miltiorrhiza. Earlier reports have shown that AtSPL9 and AtSPL10 repressed lateral root growth in Arabidopsis [27]; 10-day-old pSPL9:rSPL9 seedings exhibited fewer lateral roots than the wild type, whereas pSPL10:rSPL10 seedings exhibited the delayed generation of lateral roots in contrast to pSPL9:rSPL9, which indicated that AtSPL10 played a major role in lateral root growth [49]. We observed obvious changes in the root phenotypes, including fewer lateral roots, longer root lengths, and wider root diameters in the SmSPL6-OE lines (Figure 4C and Table 2). Although the root biomass decreased in the SmSPL6-OE lines, the phenotype of fewer lateral roots and longer root lengths are preferred for this traditional Chinese medicinal material.
The plant hormone auxin plays vital roles in the growth and development of roots [50,51]. Whether SmSPL6 inhibits lateral root development by regulating the levels of endogenous auxin should be further investigated for S. miltiorrhiza. In Arabidopsis, the expression of AtSPL9 and AtSPL10 was induced through the treatment of exogenous IAA [49]. Our data indicated that SmSPL6 was responsive to auxin; however, its expression was inhibited by the exogenous IAA treatment (Figure 1B). The opposite expression responses of SmSPL6 and AtSPL9 to IAA may have been due to the application of different concentrations of exogenous IAA. In the present study, 100 μM IAA was used to spray the S. miltiorrhiza seedlings, while the Arabidopsis seedlings were treated with 10 μM IAA. Whether SmSPL6 is induced by low concentrations of IAA will be further investigated.
Collectively, these results elucidated the role of SmSPL6 in the regulation of secondary metabolites and lateral root development in S. miltiorrhiza. The functional consistency of SmSPL6 and AtSPL9 for inhibiting lateral root development and the biosynthesis of anthocyanin revealed the conservatism of the SPL family in plants, while the function of SmSPL6 in promoting the generation of SalB demonstrated the species specificity of SPL members. In the following research, we will try to generate SPL6 mutant lines in S. miltiorrhiza using the CRISPR/Cas9 system to better elucidate the function of SmSPL6 transcription factor.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Hormone Treatments

S. miltiorrhiza seeds (Shangluo country, Shaanxi province) were sterilized and cultured on Murashige and Skoog basal medium for the transformation experiments, as described by Yan and Wang [52]. Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia-0 and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) were cultivated in a growth chamber at 22 °C under a 16 h light:8 h dark photoperiod.
Stems, leaves, primary roots, lateral roots, pistil, stamen, corolla, and calyx were separately collected from 2-year-old S. miltiorrhiza plants at the flowering stage for RNA extraction in an experimental field at Shaanxi Normal University.
Two-month-old S. miltiorrhiza plantlets were treated with 0.1 mM IAA, 0.1 mM GA3, 5 mM MeJA, or 0.1 mM ABA as previously described [53], which were then collected for RNA extraction following treatment for 10 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, and 9 h, respectively.

4.2. Gene Cloning and Sequence Analysis

The promoter fragments and full-length cDNA of SmSPL6 were amplified from the DNA and cDNA of the 2-month-old S. miltiorrhiza plantlets, respectively. The PCR products were inserted into pMD19-T (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) vector and confirmed by sequencing. The cis-elements in the promoter fragment were predicted by PlantCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/) (Accessed on 21 July 2021). All primers used in this study are listed in supplementary Table S1.

4.3. QRT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted using the Tissue Total RNA Isolation Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) and reverse transcribed to cDNA using HiScript II Reverse Transcriptase (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). The qRT-PCR was performed using the SYBR green qPCR Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) using a real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR detection system (Roche). SmUbiquitin served as an internal control. The expression levels of SmSPL6 and other genes were calculated by the 2−ΔΔCT analysis method [54].

4.4. Vector Construction and Genetic Transformation

To generate the overexpressed vector, the 1083 bp ORF of SmSPL6 was inserted into the overexpression vector pEarlygate202 using the Gateway recombinatorial cloning system (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) [55]. The 862 bp promoter fragment of SmSPL6 was cloned and inserted into the SalI and EcoRI (TaKaRa, Beijing, China) sites of the pCAMBIA1391z vector to drive the expression of GUS.
The SmSPL6-overexpressed genetic transformation of S. miltiorrhiza was achieved via an Agrobacterium-mediated method, which was established previously [52], and selected on an appropriate medium supplemented with 10 mg/L glufosinate-ammonium (Nalgene, United States).
The transgenic Arabidopsis expressing ProSmSPL6::GUS was obtained via the Agrobacterium-mediated floral dip method [56]. Transgenic seeds were selected on agar media with 25 mg/L hygromycin (Roche, Switzerland).

4.5. β-Glucuronidase (GUS) Histochemical Staining

The T2-generation transgenic Arabidopsis expressing ProSmSPL6:GUS was used for GUS staining according to a previously described protocol [57].

4.6. Subcellular Localization of SmSPL6 Protein

To investigate the subcellular localization of the SmSPL6 protein, SmSPL6 was integrated into a pEarlygate103 vector via the Gateway recombinatorial cloning system (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) [55]. Next, the recombinant pEarlygate103-SmSPL6 and pEarlygate103 vectors were transformed to onion epidermal cells, respectively, and the GFP fluorescence signals were observed as previously described [17].

4.7. Transcription Activation Assays

The ORF of SmSPL6 was integrated into the pGBKT7 vector to fuse with the GAL4 DNA-binding domain (BD) gene. The recombinant material was then transferred into Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain AH109 (Weidi Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) via the lithium acetate-mediated method [58]. The transformants were grown on SD/-Trp medium (Coolaber, Beijing, China) at 29 °C for 2–3 days, and then screened on a SD/-Trp/-Ade/-His/X-α-gal yeast medium (Coolaber, Beijing, China) to assay the transactivation activity.

4.8. Y1H Assays

The ORF of SmSPL6 was cloned into the SmaI and XhoI (TaKaRa, Beijing, China) sites of the pGADT7 vector. The 1146 bp promoter fragment of SmCYP98A14 was inserted into the SmaI and MluI (TaKaRa, Beijing, China) sites of the pHIS vector to generate the recombinant pHIS2-pCYP98A14. The pHIS2-p4CL9 was obtained in an earlier study [53]. The recombinant vector pairs were co-transformed into Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain Y187 (Weidi Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) via a lithium acetate mediated method [58]. The transformants were cultured on SD/-Trp/-Leu medium (Coolaber, Beijing, China) and then detected on SD/-Trp/-His/-Leu medium (Coolaber, Beijing, China), which was supplemented with 60 mM 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (3-AT) (Coolaber, Beijing, China).

4.9. Dual-Luciferase Assay in Tobacco Leaves

The ORF of SmSPL6 was inserted into the SmaI and XhoI (TaKaRa, Beijing, China) sites of pGreenII-62SK to obtain an effector vector. The promoter fragment of SmCYP98A14 was cloned into the HindIII and BamHI (TaKaRa, Beijing, China) sites of pGreenII 0800-LUC vector as a report vector. The recombinant vector of pSm4CL9-pGreenII 0800 LUC was synthesized as per our previous report [53]. The synthesized effector and reporter vectors were subsequently co-transferred into tobacco leaves via an Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Three days following infiltration, the activities of LUC (firefly luciferase) and renilla luciferase (REN) were determined as described previously [59].

4.10. Determination of Active Compounds

Two-month-old SmSPL6-overexpressed transgenic S. miltiorrhiza plantlets and the control were used for anthocyanin and phenolic acid analysis. The content of anthocyanin was detected as previously described [60]. The SalB and RA concentrations were measured via the HPLC method. All separations were carried out at a constant temperature (30 °C) with the specific process and parameter settings being performed as previously described [17].

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms22157895/s1, Table S1: List of primers used for PCR and qRT-PCR.

Author Contributions

D.-H.W. and X.-Y.C. conceived and designed the study. Y.C., R.C., and W.-T.W. performed the methodology. Y.C. wrote the original manuscript draft. D.-H.W. and X.-Y.C. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 31870276 and 31900254) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant number GK202107003).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Min, S.; Huang, F.F.; Deng, C.P.; Wang, Y; Kai, G. Y. Bioactivities, biosynthesis and biotechnological production of phenolic acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 953–964. [Google Scholar]
  2. Guo, Y.B.; Li, Y.; Xue, L.M.; Severino, R.P.; Gao, S.H.; Niu, J.Z.; Qin, L.P.; Zhang, D.W.; Brömme, D. Salvia miltiorrhiza: An ancient Chinese herbal medicine as a source for anti-osteoporotic drugs. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 155, 1401–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, L.; Ma, R.; Liu, C.; Liu, H.; Zhu, R.; Guo, S.; Tang, M.; Li, Y.; Niu, J.; Fu, M.; et al. Salvia miltiorrhiza: A potential red light to the development of cardiovascular diseases. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2017, 23, 1077–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Ren, J.; Fu, L.; Nile, S.H.; Zhang, J.; Kai, G. Salvia miltiorrhiza in treating cardiovascular diseases: A review on its pharmacological and clinical applications. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 5, 753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sung, R.L.; Hyelin, J.; Jeong, E.K.; Heeju, S.; Byung-Hak, K.; Min-Kyu, Y.; Ye, J.L.; Se, C.K. Anti-osteoporotic effects of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge EtOH extract both in ovariectomized and naturally menopausal mouse models. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 258, 112874. [Google Scholar]
  6. Xiao, Y.; Gao, S.; Di, P.; Chen, J.; Chen, W.; Zhang, L. Methyl jasmonate dramatically enhances the accumulation of phenolic acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy root cultures. Physiol. Plant 2009, 137, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lin, Y.L.; Wu, C.H.; Luo, M.H.; Huang, Y.J.; Wang, C.N.; Shiao, M.S.; Huang, Y.T. In vitro protective effects of salvianolic acid B on primary hepatocytes and hepatic stellate cells. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 21, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, H.; Liu, J.; Pei, T.; Bai, Z.; Han, R.; Liang, Z. Overexpression of SmANS enhances anthocyanin accumulation and alters phenolic acids content in Salvia miltiorrhiza and Salvia miltiorrhiza Bge f. alba plantlets. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Cai, Y.; Zhang, W.; Chen, Z.; Shi, Z.; He, C.; Chen, M. Recent insights into the biological activities and drug delivery systems of tanshinones. Int. J. Nanomed. 2016, 5, 121–130. [Google Scholar]
  10. MEIm, X.D.; Cao, Y.F.; Che, Y.Y.; Li, J.; Shang, Z.P.; Zhao, W.J.; Qiao, Y.J.; Zhang, J.Y. Danshen: A phytochemical and pharmacological overview. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2019, 17, 59–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, B.; Niu, J.; Li, B.; Huang, Y.; Han, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, W.; Hu, S.; Li, L.; Wang, D.; et al. Molecular characterization and overexpression of SmJMT increases the production of phenolic acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Zhang, Y.; Yan, Y.P.; Wu, Y.C.; Hua, W.P.; Chen, C.; Ge, Q.; Wang, Z.Z. Pathway engineering for phenolic acid accumulations in Salvia miltiorrhiza by combinational genetic manipulation. Metab. Eng. 2014, 21, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Xu, Z.; Luo, H.; Ji, A.; Zhang, X.; Song, J.; Chen, S. Global identification of the full-length transcripts and alternative splicing related to phenolic acid biosynthetic genes in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Xu, Z.C.; Ji, A.J.; Zhang, X.; Song, J.Y.; Chen, S.L. Biosynthesis and regulation of active compounds in medicinal model plant salvia miltiorrhiza. Chin. Herb. Med. 2016, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhou, J.; Xu, Z.; Ran, Z.; Fang, L.; Guo, L. Effects of smoke-water and smoke-derived butenolide on accumulation of phenolic acids in cultured hairy roots of Salvia Miltiorrhiza Bung. Bangl. J. Bot. 2018, 47, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Zhang, C.; Xing, B.; Yang, D.; Ren, M.; Guo, H.; Yang, S.; Liang, Z. SmbHLH3 acts as a transcription repressor for both phenolic acids and tanshinone biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. Phytochemistry 2020, 169, 112183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Li, S.S.; Wu, Y.C.; Kuang, J.; Wang, H.Q.; Du, T.Z.; Huang, Y.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, X.Y.; Wang, Z.Z. SmMYB111 is a key factor to phenolic acid biosynthesis and interacts with both SmTTG1 and SmbHLH51 in Salvia miltiorrhiza. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 8069–8078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Preston, J.C.; Hileman, L.C. Functional evolution in the plant SQUAMOSA-PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE (SPL) gene family. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Xu, M.; Hu, T.; Zhao, J.; Park, M.Y.; Earley, K.W.; Wu, G.; Yang, L.; Poethig, R.S. Developmental functions of miR156-regulated SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE (SPL) genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1006263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Li, X.Y.; Lin, E.P.; Huang, H.H.; Niu, M.Y.; Tong, Z.K.; Zhang, J.H. Molecular characterization of SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE (SPL) gene family in Betula luminifera. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Xie, K.; Wu, C.; Xiong, L. Genomic organization, differential expression, and interaction of SQUAMOSA promoter-binding-like transcription factors and microRNA156 in rice. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 280–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Zhang, L.; Wu, B.; Zhao, D.; Li, C.; Shao, F.; Lu, S. Genome-wide analysis and molecular dissection of the SPL gene family in Salvia miltiorrhiza. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2014, 6, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zheng, C.; Ye, M.; Sang, M.; Wu, R. A regulatory network for miR156-SPL module in Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 6166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Jung, J.H.; Lee, H.J.; Ryu, J.Y.; Park, C.M. SPL3/4/5 integrate developmental aging and photoperiodic signals into the FT-FD module in Arabidopsis flowering. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 1647–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Gao, R.; Wang, Y.; Gruber, M.Y.; Hannoufa, A. miR156/SPL10 modulates lateral root development, branching and leaf morphology in Arabidopsis by silencing AGAMOUS-LIKE 79. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 8, 2226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Shikata, M.; Koyama, T.; Mitsuda, N.; Ohme-Takagi, M. Arabidopsis SBP-box genes SPL10, SPL11 and SPL2 control morphological change in association with shoot maturation in the reproductive phase. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50, 2133–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Yu, N.; Niu, Q.W.; Ng. K. H.; Chua, N.H. The role of miR156/SPLs modules in Arabidopsis lateral root development. Plant J. 2015, 83, 673–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Xie, Y.; Liu, Y.; Ma, M.; Zhou, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, B.; Wang, B.; Wei, H.; Wang, H. Arabidopsis FHY3 and FAR1 integrate light and strigolactone signaling to regulate branching. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Yu, S.; Galvão, V.C.; Zhang, Y.C.; Horrer, D.; Zhang, T.Q.; Hao, Y.H.; Feng, Y.Q.; Wang, S.; Schmid, M.; Wang, J.W. Gibberellin regulates the Arabidopsis floral transition through miR156-targeted SQUAMOSA promoter binding-like transcription factors. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 3320–3332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zhang, Q.Q.; Wang, J.G.; Wang, L.Y.; Wang, J.F.; Wang, Q.; Yu, P.; Bai, M.Y.; Fan, M. Gibberellin repression of axillary bud formation in Arabidopsis by modulation of DELLA-SPL9 complex activity. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 421–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Mao, Y.B.; Liu, Y.Q.; Chen, D.Y.; Chen, F.Y.; Fang, X.; Hong, G.J.; Wang, L.J.; Wang, J.W.; Chen, X.Y. Jasmonate response decay and defense metabolite accumulation contributes to age-regulated dynamics of plant insect resistance. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 13925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Yin, H.; Hong, G.; Li, L.; Zhang, X.; Kong, Y.; Sun, Z.; Li, J.; Chen, J.; He, Y. miR156/SPL9 regulates reactive oxygen species accumulation and immune response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytopathology 2019, 109, 632–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Gou, J.Y.; Felippes, F.F.; Liu, C.J.; Weigel, D.; Wang, J.W. Negative regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis by a miR156-targeted SPL transcription factor. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 1512–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Ali, A.M.A.; El-Nour, M.E.M.; Yagi, S.M. Total phenolic and flavonoid contents and antioxidant activity of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) rhizome, callus and callus treated with some elicitors. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2018, 16, 677–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Xu, W.; Jin, X.; Yang, M.; Xue, S.; Luo, L.; Cao, X.; Zhang, C.; Qiao, S.; Zhang, C.; Li, J.; et al. Primary and secondary metabolites produced in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots by an endophytic fungal elicitor from Mucor fragilis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 160, 404–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. You, H.; Yang, S.; Zhang, L.; Hu, X.; Li, O. Promotion of phenolic compounds production in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots by six strains of rhizosphere bacteria. Eng. Life Sci. 2017, 18, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Xing, B.; Yang, D.; Guo, W.; Liang, Z.; Yan, X.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, Y. Ag+ as a more effective elicitor for production of tanshinones than phenolic acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. Molecules 2014, 20, 309–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Dong, J.; Wan, G.; Liang, Z. Accumulation of salicylic acid-induced phenolic compounds and raised activities of secondary metabolic and antioxidative enzymes in Salvia miltiorrhiza cell culture. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 148, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Li, L.; Wang, D.; Zhou, L.; Yu, X.; Yan, X.; Zhang, Q.; Li, B.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, W.; Cao, X.; et al. JA-Responsive transcription factor SmMYB97 promotes phenolic acid and tanshinone accumulation in Salvia miltiorrhiza. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 14850–14862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zhou, W.; Shi, M.; Deng, C.P.; Lu, S.J.; Huang, F.F.; Wang, Y.; Kai, G.Y. The methyl jasmonate-responsive transcription factor SmMYB1 promotes phenolic acid biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xing, B.; Liang, L.; Liu, L.; Hou, Z.; Yang, D.; Yan, K.; Zhang, X.; Liang, Z. Overexpression of SmbHLH148 induced biosynthesis of tanshinones as well as phenolic acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. Plant Cell Rep. 2018, 37, 1681–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Huang, Q.; Sun, M.; Yuan, T.; Wang, Y.; Shi, M.; Lu, S.; Tang, B.; Pan, J.; Wang, Y.; Kai, G. The AP2/ERF transcription factor SmERF1L1 regulates the biosynthesis of tanshinones and phenolic acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Food Chem. 2019, 274, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Winkel-Shirley, B. Biosynthesis of flavonoids and effects of stress. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2002, 5, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gould, K.S. Nature's Swiss Army Knife: The diverse protective roles of anthocyanins in leaves. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2004, 2004, 314–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Ai, Y.; Zhu, Z. Melatonin antagonizes jasmonate-triggered anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 5392–5400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. He, J.; Giusti, M.M. Anthocyanins: Natural colorants with health-promoting properties. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 1, 163–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ghosh, D.; Konishi, T. Anthocyanins and anthocyanin-rich extracts: Role in diabetes and eye function. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 16, 200–208. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wu, Y.C.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, X.R.; Wang, B.; Cao, X.Y.; Wang, Z.Z. AtPAP1 interacts with and activates SmbHLH51, a positive regulator to phenolic acids biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ye, B.B.; Shang, G.D.; Pan, Y.; Xu, Z.G.; Zhou, C.M.; Mao, Y.B.; Bao, N.; Sun, L.; Xu, T.; Wang, J.W. AP2/ERF transcription factors integrate age and wound signals for root regeneration. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 226–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Hagen, G. Auxin signal transduction. Essays Biochem. 2015, 58, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  51. Sager, R.; Wang, X.; Hill, K.; Yoo, B.C.; Caplan, J.; Nedo, A.; Tran, T.; Bennett, M.J.; Lee, J.Y. Auxin-dependent control of a plasmodesmal regulator creates a negative feedback loop modulating lateral root emergence. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yan, Y.P.; Wang, Z.Z. Genetic transformation of the medicinal plant Salvia miltiorrhiza by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated method. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2007, 88, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Peng, J.J.; Wu, Y.C.; Wang, S.Q.; Niu, J.F.; Cao, X.Y. SmbHLH53 is relevant to jasmonate signaling and plays dual roles in regulating the genes for enzymes in the pathway for salvianolic acid B biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Gene 2020, 756, 144920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Reece-Hoyes, J.S.; Walhout, A.J.M. Gateway recombinational cloning. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2018, 8, top094912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Clough, S.J.; Bent, A.F. Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Jefferson, R.A.; Kavanagh, T.A.; Bevan, M.W. GUS fusions: Beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J. 1987, 6, 3901–3907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Gietz, R.D.; Schiestl, R.H. High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Du, T.Z.; Niu, J.F.; Su, J.; Li, S.S.; Guo, X.R.; Li, L.; Cao, X.Y.; Kang, J.F. SmbHLH37 functions antagonistically with SmMYC2 in regulating jasmonate-mediated biosynthesis of phenolic acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Zhang, Y.; Yan, Y.P.; Wang, Z.Z. The Arabidopsis PAP1 transcription factor plays an important role in the enrichment of phenolic acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 12168–12175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 22 07895 g001 550
Figure 1. Expression profiles of SmSPL6 in Salvia miltiorrhiza. (A) The expression of SmSPL6 in different tissues. (B) Expression changes in response to treatment with 5 mM MeJA, 0.1 mM ABA, 0.1 mM IAA, and 0.1 mM GA3. All data are means of three biological replicates, with error bars indicating SD, red dotted line indicates the control which was set to 1. One-way ANOVA (followed by Tukey’s comparisons) tested for significant differences between means (indicated by different letters at p < 0.05). * and ** represent a significant difference at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 compared with the control, respectively.
Figure 1. Expression profiles of SmSPL6 in Salvia miltiorrhiza. (A) The expression of SmSPL6 in different tissues. (B) Expression changes in response to treatment with 5 mM MeJA, 0.1 mM ABA, 0.1 mM IAA, and 0.1 mM GA3. All data are means of three biological replicates, with error bars indicating SD, red dotted line indicates the control which was set to 1. One-way ANOVA (followed by Tukey’s comparisons) tested for significant differences between means (indicated by different letters at p < 0.05). * and ** represent a significant difference at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 compared with the control, respectively.
Ijms 22 07895 g001
Ijms 22 07895 g002 550
Figure 2. Temporal and spatial expression patterns of SmSPL6. (A) Two days after germination. (B) Seven days after germination. (C) Ten days after germination. (D) Rosette leaf. (E) Flower. (F) Stem leaf. (G) Root at the flowering stage. (H) Stem. (I) Silique.
Figure 2. Temporal and spatial expression patterns of SmSPL6. (A) Two days after germination. (B) Seven days after germination. (C) Ten days after germination. (D) Rosette leaf. (E) Flower. (F) Stem leaf. (G) Root at the flowering stage. (H) Stem. (I) Silique.
Ijms 22 07895 g002
Ijms 22 07895 g003 550
Figure 3. Subcellular location and transcription activity analysis of SmSPL6 protein. (A) Subcellular location of SmSPL6. The fluorescence signal was observed via laser scanning confocal microscope. DAPI, 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole is a blue fluorescent DNA stain that was used for indicating nucleus region. (B) Transcription activity analysis of SmSPL6 protein. Yeast colonies with three different dilutions were grown on the SD/-Trp medium, then spotted on the SD/-Trp/-Ade/-His/X-α-gal. X-α-gal: 5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-α-D-galactoside medium, the color reaction substrate of α-galactosidase.
Figure 3. Subcellular location and transcription activity analysis of SmSPL6 protein. (A) Subcellular location of SmSPL6. The fluorescence signal was observed via laser scanning confocal microscope. DAPI, 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole is a blue fluorescent DNA stain that was used for indicating nucleus region. (B) Transcription activity analysis of SmSPL6 protein. Yeast colonies with three different dilutions were grown on the SD/-Trp medium, then spotted on the SD/-Trp/-Ade/-His/X-α-gal. X-α-gal: 5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-α-D-galactoside medium, the color reaction substrate of α-galactosidase.
Ijms 22 07895 g003
Ijms 22 07895 g004 550
Figure 4. Identification and phenotype of the SmSPL6-overexpressed transgenic Salvia miltiorrhiza. (A) PCR-amplification product from the genome DNA of transgenic lines and the control. Forward primer: CaMV35S–F, reverse primer: SmSPL6–R, full length: 1833 bp. Lanes M, DL2000 DNA marker; 1–9, different transgenic lines; 10, control line obtained by plant tissue culture without Agrobacterium infection. (B) qRT-PCR analysis. Fold changes reflect the expressions of transgenic lines compared with the control expression, where the control values were set to 1. All data are the means of three replicates, with error bars indicating SD; *** represents a significant difference at p < 0.01 in contrast to the control. (C) Phenotype of the SmSPL6-overexpressed OE5, OE6, and OE8 transgenic lines and the control.
Figure 4. Identification and phenotype of the SmSPL6-overexpressed transgenic Salvia miltiorrhiza. (A) PCR-amplification product from the genome DNA of transgenic lines and the control. Forward primer: CaMV35S–F, reverse primer: SmSPL6–R, full length: 1833 bp. Lanes M, DL2000 DNA marker; 1–9, different transgenic lines; 10, control line obtained by plant tissue culture without Agrobacterium infection. (B) qRT-PCR analysis. Fold changes reflect the expressions of transgenic lines compared with the control expression, where the control values were set to 1. All data are the means of three replicates, with error bars indicating SD; *** represents a significant difference at p < 0.01 in contrast to the control. (C) Phenotype of the SmSPL6-overexpressed OE5, OE6, and OE8 transgenic lines and the control.
Ijms 22 07895 g004
Ijms 22 07895 g005 550
Figure 5. SmSPL6 negatively regulates the biosynthesis of anthocyanin. (A) Anthocyanin extracted from the whole plant of the transgenic lines and the control. (B) Concentrations of anthocyanin in the transgenic lines and the control. (C) Expression changes of the enzyme genes for the biosynthetic pathway of anthocyanin. CHALCONE SYNTHASE (CHS), FLAVANONE 3-HYDROXYLASE (F3H), FLAVONOID 3′-HYDROXYLASE (F3’H), DIHYDROFLAVONOL REDUCTASE (DFR), ANTHOCYANIDIN SYNTHASE (ANS). All data are the means of three biological replicates, with error bars indicating SD. Red dotted lines indicate the control value, which was set to 1. * represents a significant difference at p < 0.05 compared with the control.
Figure 5. SmSPL6 negatively regulates the biosynthesis of anthocyanin. (A) Anthocyanin extracted from the whole plant of the transgenic lines and the control. (B) Concentrations of anthocyanin in the transgenic lines and the control. (C) Expression changes of the enzyme genes for the biosynthetic pathway of anthocyanin. CHALCONE SYNTHASE (CHS), FLAVANONE 3-HYDROXYLASE (F3H), FLAVONOID 3′-HYDROXYLASE (F3’H), DIHYDROFLAVONOL REDUCTASE (DFR), ANTHOCYANIDIN SYNTHASE (ANS). All data are the means of three biological replicates, with error bars indicating SD. Red dotted lines indicate the control value, which was set to 1. * represents a significant difference at p < 0.05 compared with the control.
Ijms 22 07895 g005
Ijms 22 07895 g006 550
Figure 6. Concentrations of salvianolic acid B (SalB) in the whole plant (C) or the roots (D) and rosmarinic acid (RA) in the whole plant (A) or the roots (B) of the SmSPL6-overexpressed (OE) transgenic lines and the control. All data are the means of three biological replicates, with error bars indicating SD; * represents a significant difference at p < 0.05 compared with the control.
Figure 6. Concentrations of salvianolic acid B (SalB) in the whole plant (C) or the roots (D) and rosmarinic acid (RA) in the whole plant (A) or the roots (B) of the SmSPL6-overexpressed (OE) transgenic lines and the control. All data are the means of three biological replicates, with error bars indicating SD; * represents a significant difference at p < 0.05 compared with the control.
Ijms 22 07895 g006
Ijms 22 07895 g007 550
Figure 7. Expression changes of enzyme genes for the phenolic acid biosynthetic pathway in the SmSPL6-overexpressed (OE) transgenic lines. (A) Proposed biosynthetic pathway for phenolic acids (red indicates genes activated by SmSPL6). TAT, tyrosine aminotransferase; HPPR, hydroxyl phenylpyruvate reductase; PAL, phenylalanine ammonia lyase; C4H, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase; 4CL, hydroxycinnamate-CoA ligase; RAS, rosmarinic acid synthase; and CYP, cytochrome P450 enzymes. (B) Expression changes of enzyme genes for the tyrosine pathway, phenylpropanoid pathway, and specific phenolic acid pathway in the SmSPL6-OE lines. The expression level in the control was set to 1 (shown as red dotted lines). All data are the means of three biological replicates, with error bars indicating SD; * represents a significant difference at p < 0.05 compared with the control.
Figure 7. Expression changes of enzyme genes for the phenolic acid biosynthetic pathway in the SmSPL6-overexpressed (OE) transgenic lines. (A) Proposed biosynthetic pathway for phenolic acids (red indicates genes activated by SmSPL6). TAT, tyrosine aminotransferase; HPPR, hydroxyl phenylpyruvate reductase; PAL, phenylalanine ammonia lyase; C4H, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase; 4CL, hydroxycinnamate-CoA ligase; RAS, rosmarinic acid synthase; and CYP, cytochrome P450 enzymes. (B) Expression changes of enzyme genes for the tyrosine pathway, phenylpropanoid pathway, and specific phenolic acid pathway in the SmSPL6-OE lines. The expression level in the control was set to 1 (shown as red dotted lines). All data are the means of three biological replicates, with error bars indicating SD; * represents a significant difference at p < 0.05 compared with the control.
Ijms 22 07895 g007
Ijms 22 07895 g008 550
Figure 8. SmSPL6 binds to the promoter regions of Sm4CL9 and SmCYP98A14 and activates their expression. (A) GTAC motifs in the promoter regions of Sm4CL9 and SmCYP98A14. Red rectangles represent the GTAC motif. (B) Yeast one-hybrid detected interactions between the SmSPL6 and the promoters of Sm4CL9 and SmCYP98A14. The p53HIS2/pGADT7-p53 and p53HIS2/pGADT7 served as positive and negative controls, respectively. (C) Schematic diagram of constructs used in assays of transient transcriptional activity. (D) SmSPL6 activates the expression of Sm4CL9 and SmCYP98A14. Effector SmSPL6 was co-transformed with p4CL9-LUC/pCYP98A14-LUC reporters. All data are the means of three biological replicates, with error bars indicating SD; * represents a significant difference at p < 0.05 compared with the control.
Figure 8. SmSPL6 binds to the promoter regions of Sm4CL9 and SmCYP98A14 and activates their expression. (A) GTAC motifs in the promoter regions of Sm4CL9 and SmCYP98A14. Red rectangles represent the GTAC motif. (B) Yeast one-hybrid detected interactions between the SmSPL6 and the promoters of Sm4CL9 and SmCYP98A14. The p53HIS2/pGADT7-p53 and p53HIS2/pGADT7 served as positive and negative controls, respectively. (C) Schematic diagram of constructs used in assays of transient transcriptional activity. (D) SmSPL6 activates the expression of Sm4CL9 and SmCYP98A14. Effector SmSPL6 was co-transformed with p4CL9-LUC/pCYP98A14-LUC reporters. All data are the means of three biological replicates, with error bars indicating SD; * represents a significant difference at p < 0.05 compared with the control.
Ijms 22 07895 g008
Table
Table 1. Cis-elements analysis of SmSPL6 promoter.
Table 1. Cis-elements analysis of SmSPL6 promoter.
Cis-ElementsSequenceNumberFunctions
ABREACGTG1abscisic acid responsiveness element
Box4ATTAAT3involved in light responsiveness
Box IITGGTAATAA1part of a light responsive element
CAT-boxGCCACT1related to meristem expression
G-boxCACGTC1involved in light responsiveness
P-boxCCTTTTG1gibberellin-responsive element
I-boxCCTTATCCT1part of a light responsive element
TGA-elementAACGAC1auxin-responsive element
Table
Table 2. Root parameters of the SmSPL6 overexpressed (OEs) transgenic lines and the control.
Table 2. Root parameters of the SmSPL6 overexpressed (OEs) transgenic lines and the control.
LinesRoots Length/cmFresh Weight/gLateral Roots Number
control8.54 ± 0.87 c0.760 ± 0.082 a>20 a
OE516.02 ± 0.52 b0.625 ± 0.064 a15 ± 2 b
OE617.15 ± 0.49 b0.600 ± 0.028 a15 ± 2 b
OE820.10 ± 0.71 a0.385 ± 0.035 b12 ± 2 b
Note: One-way ANOVA (followed by Tukey’s comparisons) tested for significant differences between means (indicated by different letters at p < 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cao, Y.; Chen, R.; Wang, W.-T.; Wang, D.-H.; Cao, X.-Y. SmSPL6 Induces Phenolic Acid Biosynthesis and Affects Root Development in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7895. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22157895

AMA Style

Cao Y, Chen R, Wang W-T, Wang D-H, Cao X-Y. SmSPL6 Induces Phenolic Acid Biosynthesis and Affects Root Development in Salvia miltiorrhiza. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(15):7895. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22157895

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cao, Yao, Rui Chen, Wen-Tao Wang, Dong-Hao Wang, and Xiao-Yan Cao. 2021. "SmSPL6 Induces Phenolic Acid Biosynthesis and Affects Root Development in Salvia miltiorrhiza" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 15: 7895. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22157895

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop