Next Article in Journal
Dissecting Cellular Mechanisms of Long-Chain Acylcarnitines-Driven Cardiotoxicity: Disturbance of Calcium Homeostasis, Activation of Ca2+-Dependent Phospholipases, and Mitochondrial Energetics Collapse
Next Article in Special Issue
Seed Priming: A Feasible Strategy to Enhance Drought Tolerance in Crop Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Application of the MSAP Technique to Evaluate Epigenetic Changes in Plant Conservation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transcriptional and Metabolic Profiling of Potato Plants Expressing a Plastid-Targeted Electron Shuttle Reveal Modulation of Genes Associated to Drought Tolerance by Chloroplast Redox Poise
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nitric Oxide Signal, Nitrogen Metabolism, and Water Balance Affected by γ-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) in Relation to Enhanced Tolerance to Water Stress in Creeping Bentgrass

1
Department of Grassland Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
2
Institute of Turfgrass Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(20), 7460; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207460
Submission received: 21 August 2020 / Revised: 28 September 2020 / Accepted: 6 October 2020 / Published: 10 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants)

Abstract

:
γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) plays an important role in regulating stress tolerance in plants. Purposes of this study was to determine the effect of an exogenous supply of GABA on tolerance to water stress in creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera), and further reveal the GABA-induced key mechanisms related to water balance, nitrogen (N) metabolism and nitric oxide (NO) production in response to water stress. Plants were pretreated with or without 0.5 mM GABA solution in the roots for 3 days, and then subjected to water stress induced by −0.52 MPa polyethylene glycol 6000 for 12 days. The results showed that water stress caused leaf water deficit, chlorophyll (Chl) loss, oxidative damage (increases in superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, malondialdehyde, and protein carbonyl content), N insufficiency, and metabolic disturbance. However, the exogenous addition of GABA significantly increased endogenous GABA content, osmotic adjustment and antioxidant enzyme activities (superoxide dismutase, catalase, dehydroascorbate reductase, glutathione reductase and monodehydroascorbate reductase), followed by effectively alleviating water stress damage, including declines in oxidative damage, photoinhibition, and water and Chl loss. GABA supply not only provided more available N, but also affected N metabolism through activating nitrite reductase and glutamine synthetase activities under water stress. The supply of GABA did not increase glutamate content and glutamate decarboxylase activity, but enhanced glutamate dehydrogenase activity, which might indicate that GABA promoted the conversion and utilization of glutamate for maintaining Chl synthesis and tricarboxylic acid cycle when creeping bentgrass underwent water stress. In addition, GABA-induced NO production, depending on nitrate reductase and NO-associated protein pathways, could be associated with the enhancement of antioxidant defense. Current findings reveal the critical role of GABA in regulating signal transduction and metabolic homeostasis in plants under water-limited condition.

1. Introduction

The occurrence of drought is rising with the change of global climate and the decrease in available water resources. Drought stress causes plant growth inhibition and damages normal biological and metabolic processes in plants, such as causing a decline in photosynthetic rate, an increase in oxidative damage, and accelerated leaf senescence [1,2]. Previous studies have shown that plant growth regulators (PGRs) can be used to enhance plant tolerance to water stress [3,4]. γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) is a four-carbon non-protein amino acid, and was firstly studied in animals. In recent years, it has been found that GABA plays an important role in regulating growth and is also beneficial to carbon and nitrogen (N) balance, cytoplasmic pH regulation, oxidative balance and osmotic adjustment (OA) under abiotic stress [5,6]. Drought stress can cause a significant increase of GABA content in soybean (Glycine max) leaves [7]. Liu et al. showed that the exogenous application of GABA could increase endogenous GABA content and effectively alleviate heat damage in creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) [8]. Liu et al. found that tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants significantly increased GABA biosynthesis in response to water stress, and GABA could act as an effective regulator to enhance antioxidant defense [9]. GABA affected the aluminum-activated malic acid transporter involved in regulating plant growth and stress response [10]. Exogenous GABA, as an important N source, maintained the normal growth of Arabidopsis thaliana under low N stress [11]. GABA application improved antioxidant enzyme activities and reduced the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and malondialdehyde (MDA), thus maintaining cell membrane stability in rice (Oryza sativa) under high temperature stress [12]. These previous studies illustrated the multiple functions of GABA in affecting stress tolerance in plants. However, GABA-regulated water and metabolic homeostasis, associated with tolerance to water stress, are still not fully demonstrated in plants.
The N metabolism is one of the most basic physiological processes in plants due to the primary roles of N as a nutrient and in important components of many compounds, such as proteins, nucleic acids, enzymes, chlorophyll, vitamins, plant hormones and alkaloids [13]. The N metabolism affects plant growth and development, quality and yield of crops, and resistance to environmental stress [14]. Under drought stress, a higher N content could improve photosynthesis, antioxidant enzyme activities, and proline accumulation associated with better drought tolerance in rice [15]. N is also well known for its effects on reducing leaf senescence and enhancing heat tolerance under high temperature conditions [16,17]. Nitric oxide (NO) is an important product of N metabolism. As an important signaling molecule, NO plays a positive role in regulating various physiological processes in plants under normal and adverse conditions [18]. NO-associated protein (NOA) and nitrate reductase (NR) pathways dependent on N metabolism are the two main pathways of NO production in plants [19]. Under drought stress, NO promoted the wheat (Triticum aestivum) seed germination rate, embryo length, endopeptidase and amylase activities, and also increased antioxidant enzyme activities and proline content in wheat [20]. Under salt and heat stress, a low concentration of NO pretreatment could enhance photosystem II quantum production and antioxidant enzyme activities, thus improving the survival rate of rice seedlings [21]. NO treatment could alleviate the drought damage in wheat seedlings [22] and also effectively reduced the growth inhibition and lipid peroxidation in Elymus nutans under cold stress [23]. Until now, the role of GABA in regulating NO production, contributing to enhanced tolerance to water stress in plant species, has been unclear.
Creeping bentgrass is an excellent gramineous turfgrass and is widely used on sports lawns, such as golf course, bowling lawns and tennis courts, due to its fine texture and resistance to low and frequent mowing. However, creeping bentgrass is a cold-season shallow-rooted turfgrass with lower drought tolerance [24]. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the exogenous application of GABA could significantly improve tolerance to water stress based on phenotypic and physiological changes, and further reveal the GABA-induced key mechanism related to antioxidant defense, water balance, N metabolism and NO production in creeping bentgrass under water stress.

2. Results

2.1. Cell Membrane Stability, Water Status, and Photosynthesis Affected by GABA

Phenotypic changes showed that water stress resulted in leaves wilting (Figure 1A). Leaf relative water content (RWC) significantly decreased, but the exogenous supply of GABA could significantly alleviate stress-induced decline in RWC during 12 days of water stress (Figure 1B). Osmotic adjustment (OA) gradually increased with the prolonged period of water stress, and GABA-treated plants exhibited significantly higher OA than untreated plants at 8, 10 and 12 days of water stress (Figure 1C). Water stress decreased water use efficiency (WUE) in leaves, whereas GABA-treated plants could maintain significantly higher WUE than untreated plants at 8 and 12 days of water stress (Figure 1D). Electrolyte leakage (EL) obviously increased when GABA-treated and untreated plants responded to water stress, but GABA-treated plants exhibited a 29.6% decrease in EL as compared to untreated plants under water stress (Figure 1E). When plants were subjected to water stress, total chlorophyll (Chl), Chla/b, and net photosynthetic rate (Pn) decreased significantly (Figure 2A–C). GABA-treated creeping bentgrass maintained significantly high levels of Chl, Chla/b and Pn under water stress (Figure 2A–C).

2.2. Oxidative Damage and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities Affected by GABA

Superoxide anion (O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), MDA, and protein carbonyl content were not affected significantly by GABA pretreatment under normal conditions (Figure 3A–D). Water stress induced significant increases in O2, H2O2, MDA and protein carbonyl content in leaves, and exogenously applied GABA reduced the accumulation of O2, H2O2, MDA and protein carbonyl content in the leaves of creeping bentgrass in response to water stress (Figure 3A–D). GABA-treated plants showed 14.9%, 33.8%, 12% or 23.7% decreases in O2, H2O2, MDA, and carbonyl content compared to untreated plants under water stress, respectively (Figure 3A–D). Water stress led to increases in peroxidase (POD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), dehydroascorbate reductase (DR), glutathione reductase (GR) and monodehydroascorbate reductase (MR) activities, and exogenous GABA further improved stress-induced increases in DR, GR and MR activities in leaves after 12 days (Figure 4). The superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activities were not changed by water stress in plants without GABA application, but significantly increased in GABA-treated plants under water stress. The GABA pretreatment did affect POD activity under normal conditions and water stress (Figure 4).

2.3. Nitrogen Metabolism and Nitric Oxide Affected by GABA

As shown in Figure 5, water stress led to a decrease in total N content in plants without GABA application, but water-stressed plants with GABA pretreatment maintained total N content at a normal level in the leaves (Figure 5A). Under non-stress conditions, exogenous GABA had no significant effects on nitrate N, ammoniacal N or nitrite N content (Figure 5B–D). Water stress promoted the nitrate N accumulation in all treatments, and water-stressed plants without or with GABA application had a 25.23% or 34.93% increase in nitrate N content compared to control, respectively (Figure 5B). Water stress reduced ammonia N and nitrite N content in all treatments (Figure 5C,D). As compared with the control treatment, there was a 27.99% or 49.51% decrease in ammonia N content with the PEG or GABA + PEG treatment, respectively (Figure 5C). GABA-treated plants maintained significantly higher nitrite N than untreated plants under water stress (Figure 5D). The NR activity in leaves decreased sharply under water stress, and GABA-pretreated plants had significantly higher NR activities than untreated plants at 8 and 12 days of water stress (Figure 6A). Nitrite reductase (NiR), glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate synthase (GOGAT) activities significantly increased when creeping bentgrass responded to water stress (Figure 6B–D). Exogenous GABA significantly reduced NR activity under water stress (Figure 6B). The GS activity in GABA-treated plants showed a 25.6% or 36.6% increase compared to that in untreated plants at 8 or 12 days of water stress, respectively (Figure 6C). Exogenous GABA also further improved the stress-induced increase in GOGAT activity at 8 and 12 days (Figure 6D). The NO content and NOA activity gradually increased during water stress (Figure 7A,B). The NO content in the leaves of GABA-pretreated plants increased by 30.8% or 37.7% from that of untreated plants at 8 or 12 days of water stress, respectively (Figure 7A). The NOA activity in the leaves of GABA-treated plants was 0.8 or 0.36 times higher than that of untreated plants at 8 or 12 days of water stress, respectively (Figure 7B).

2.4. Endogenous Glutamic Acid and GABA Affected by GABA

Under normal conditions, the GABA pretreatment had no significant effects on glutamate content, GABA content, glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) activity or glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) activity in leaves (Figure 8A–D). Water stress significantly improved glutamate (Glu) content, but decreased GABA content in the leaves (Figure 8A,B). Exogenous GABA significantly reduced glutamic acid accumulation, but promoted GABA accumulation under water stress (Figure 8A,B). The GDH activity in the leaf was significantly reduced under water stress, and GABA-treated plants had higher GDH activity than untreated plants at 8 and 12 days of water stress (Figure 8C). There were no significant differences in GAD activity among four treatments at 0 day, and the GABA + PEG treatment exhibited significantly lower GAD activity than the other three treatments at 8 days (Figure 8D). Water stress improved GAD activity, but exogenous GABA application reduced the stress-induced increase in GAD activity at 12 days (Figure 8D). Figure 9 shows the integrative pathways induced by water stress and exogenous GABA application in the leaves of creeping bentgrass.

3. Discussion

Drought stress leads to an imbalance in water, stomatal closure, destruction of membrane integrity, and disorder of other physiological processes in plant cells [25,26,27,28]. Drought-caused stomatal closure reduces transpiration rates and gaseous exchange, which seriously inhibits the photosynthetic rate of plants and plant growth [29,30]. A previous study found that foliar application of GABA could significantly alleviate leaf wilting and Chl loss, and also improved OA and photosynthesis in the leaves of creeping bentgrass under heat stress [31]. In the current study, creeping bentgrass pretreated with GABA in the roots significantly alleviated stress-induced leaf water loss and led to a decline in Pn, which could be due to the enhanced OA and lower Chl loss in leaves under water stress. In addition to changes of water status and photosynthesis, enhanced ROS production, including O2 and H2O2, is one of inevitable consequences of water stress in different cellular compartments [32]. Antioxidant enzymes, such as SOD, CAT, POD and enzymes involved in the ascorbic acid-glutathione (ASA-GSH) cycle (APX, DR, GR, and MR), are key components of the antioxidant defense that removes O2, H2O2 and other free radicals, thereby maintaining a proper redox balance in cells under stress conditions [33]. Protein carbonyl is one of products of protein peroxidation is and widely used as a marker of oxidative damage in plants [34]. It has been found that foliar GABA pretreatment significantly reduced O2, H2O2 and MDA content through upregulating transcript levels of genes encoding POD, APX and GR in the leaves of creeping bentgrass under heat and drought stress [35]. This is similar to the present findings: the application of GABA increased SOD, CAT, DR, GR and MR activities associated with significant decreases in O2, H2O2, MDA, and protein carbonyl content in creeping bentgrass under water stress. As stated above, GABA-pretreated creeping bentgrass showed less stress damage than untreated plants in response to water stress, which could be related to a GABA-induced improvement in OA and antioxidant defense.
Previous research revealed that GABA can be used as a temporary N pool and source in plants [36]. The N content decreased due to the inhibition of the GABA biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana mutant under hypoxic condition [37]. However, N metabolism and conversion may be more important than N accumulation when plants suffer from water stress. In the present study, water stress significantly decreased the total N in the leaves of creeping bentgrass, but exogenous GABA supply elevated N content in creeping bentgrass under water stress. This is consistent with previous studies on the function of GABA as an N source in plants. N uptake and conversion is an important metabolic process for plant growth and adaption to stress. NR catalyzes the conversion of NO3 into NO2, which is reduced by NiR to generate NH4+. NH4+ can be assimilated into organic N for maintaining N balance [38]. NiR activity increased firstly and then decreased in apple (Malus domestica) leaves under drought stress [39]. Exogenous GABA maintained N metabolism balance in muskmelon (Cucumis melo) seedlings under Ca (NO3)2 stress [40]. Our results found that drought stress enhanced NO3 accumulation, but decreased the NO2- and NH4+ content in creeping bentgrass. The exogenous addition of GABA promoted the conversion of NO3 to NO2 by increasing NR activity in the leaves of creeping bentgrass under water stress. These findings suggest that GABA supply not only provided more N, but also affected N metabolism when creeping bengtgrass responded to water stress.
GS in plants is involved in NH4+ assimilation, which is an important pathway for the conversion of inorganic N to organic glutamine. This metabolic process also reduces ammonia’s toxicity to plants under adverse environmental conditions. In plants, GOGAT catalyzes the conversion of glutamine into glutamate, which is a key intermediate amino acid for synthesizing other amino acids, such as GABA by GAD and glutamine by GS. In addition, GDH catalyzes the conversion of glutamate to α-ketoglutaric acid, which is an intermediate of the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) cycle [41,42,43]. In our study, the exogenous addition of GABA could effectively alleviate the water stress-caused decline in GABA in creeping bentgrass. GABA application enhanced NH4+ assimilation, and also improved the interchange between glutamate and glutamine through activating GS and GOGAT in the leaves of creeping bentgrass under water stress. Interestingly, exogenous GABA did not increase glutamate content and GAD activity, but enhanced GDH activity in creeping bentgrass. These findings might indicate that GABA promoted the conversion and utilization of glutamate for maintaining Chl synthesis and the TCA cycle when creeping bentgrass was exposed to water stress. A previous analysis of metabolomics found that the foliar application of GABA could increase the accumulation of intermediate metabolites of the TCA cycle, implying the function of GABA in maintaining metabolic homeostasis in creeping bentgrass under heat and drought conditions [31,44]. However, GABA-regulated N and the amino acid metabolism associated with drought tolerance in perennial plants still deserve to be studied in the future.
There are three main pathways for NO synthesis, namely the NOA pathway, the NR pathway, and the NiR pathway in plants [45,46,47,48]. As a very important second signal molecule, NO regulates the growth and development of plants and stress tolerance under biotic and abiotic stresses [49]. Many studies have reported that the NO signal helps plants to survive stressful conditions through activating antioxidative enzymes to alleviate oxidative damage. For example, NO could improve the drought tolerance of white clover (Trifolium repens) associated with increases in SOD, CAT, APX, and POD activity, as well as gene expression [50]. NO treatment effectively alleviated drought-induced oxidative damage in relation to increases in SOD and POD activities in wheat seedlings [22]. The drought tolerance of Dendrobium huoshanense could be improved by exogenous NO through promoting different antioxidant enzyme (SOD, CAT and POD) activities, photosynthetic capacity, and Chl content under drought stress [51]. The results of the current study show that the exogenous addition of GABA significantly increases NO content, which could be associated with the activation of SOD, CAT, DR, GR and MR activities in the leaves of creeping bentgrass under water stress. The study of Peng et al. [50] found that an enhanced antioxidant defense was regulated by the spermidine-induced NO signal, depending on the NOA and NR pathways, when white clover suffered from water stress, which was consistent with our present findings in creeping bentgrass.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Treatments

Seeds of creeping bentgrass cv. ‘Penncross’ were purchased from the Tee-2-Green company, Oregon, USA. All seeds were quickly sterilized with 0.1% mercuric chloride solution for 3 min, and then rinsed 3 times with distilled water. Seeds (0.39 g) were germinated in a plastic container (24 cm length, 18 cm width, 9 cm depth) with sterile quartz sand in a controlled growth chamber (14 h photoperiod cycle, 23/19 °C day/night temperature, 65% relative humidity, and 750 μmol photon m−2 s1 photosynthetic active radiation). After 7 days of germination, the seedlings were irrigated with Hoagland’s solution [52] for 23 days. For the 3 days of GABA pretreatment, seedlings were cultivated in the Hoagland’s solution containing 0.5 mmol/L GABA [53], and the GABA-untreated seedlings were cultivated in the normal Hoagland’s solution for 3 days. The 33-day-old GABA-pretreated and untreated seedlings were then subjected to normal cultivation or water stress induced by polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 (−0.52 MPa) for 12 days. The PEG 6000 was dissolved in the Hoagland’s solution. The Hoagland’s and PEG solutions were refreshed every day. All plants were arranged in a completely randomized design. Each treatment had four independent biological replicates (four containers) and a container was regarded as a biological replicate. Leaves were sampled at 0, 6, 8, 10 and 12 days under well-watered and water stress conditions.

4.2. Measurements of Cell Membrane Stability, Water Status and Photosynthesis

For relative EL, 0.1 g of fresh leaves were fully soaked in distilled water for 24 h and the initial conductivity (S1) of the solution was detected using a conductivity meter (model 32; Yellow Springs Instrument Co., Yellow Spring, OH). After being autoclaved for 15 min at 100 °C, the final conductivity (S2) of the solution was detected. EL was calculated according to EL (%) = S1/S2 × 100% [54]. For, leaf RWC, the method of [55] was used and 0.2 g of fresh leaves were collected for the determination of RWC. Osmotic potential (OP) in the leaf was detected by using the method of [56]. Leaves (0.2 g) were collected and immediately frozen in liquid N for 10 min and thawed at 4 °C for 25 min. The cell liquid was put into the sampling chamber of an osmometer (Wescor, Logan, UT, USA) to get the osmolality. OP was calculated based on MPa = −c × 2.58 × 10−3. The OP of control leaves was subtracted from the OP of stressed leaves to get the OA in leaves. For Chl content in leaves, 0.1 g of leaves was submerged in 10 mL of 95% ethanol and 85% acetone (1:1 v:v) for 48 h in the dark and the absorbance of the extraction was measured at 663 nm and 645 nm [57]. Pn and instantaneous WUE were estimated using a portable photosynthetic system (CIRAS-3, PP Systems, USA).

4.3. Determination of Oxidative Damage and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities

H2O2 or O2 contents were determined according to the method of [58] or [59], respectively. The carbonyl content of protein was determined by using Test Kits of Suzhou Comin biotechnology company, China. The 0.15 g leaf samples were used to detect H2O2, O2, or carbonyl content for a replicate of each treatment. For MDA content, soluble protein content and antioxidant enzyme activities, leaves (0.1 g) were ground with 1.5 mL of pre-cooled phosphate buffer (150 mM, pH 7.0) and centrifuged at 15,000 g for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected for determining MDA content [60], soluble protein content [61], SOD activity [62], POD and CAT activities [63], APX activity [64], and GR, MR and DR activity [65], respectively. For POD, CAT, APX, DHAR, GR and MDHAR activity, the absorbance of the reaction solution was monitored every 10 s for 1 min.

4.4. Determination of Nitrogen and γ-Aminobutyric Acid Metabolism

Total N content was determined via the kjeldahl method [66]. The samples were crushed, weighed, and packed with 0.2 g of filter paper, and then put into the de-boiling tube. One de-boiling piece was added to each tube, and 5 mL of sulfuric acid was added. There was a blank filter paper control in each batch of de-boiling tube. For nitrate N, the 2 g of dry leaf samples was added into 10 mL of deionized water, and then were heated in a boiling water bath for 30 min. After filtering, 0.1 mL of filtrate was mixed with 0.4 mL of 0.5% salicylic acid–sulfuric acid solution. After homogenization, 9.5 mL of 8% sodium hydroxide solution was slowly added into the supernatant and the absorbance of the mixture was measured at 450 nm [67]. For nitrite N, 0.2 g dry sample powder was added into 70 mL water and 12 mL 20 gL−1 sodium hydroxide solution. The 10 mL of zinc sulfate solution was added and then heated in a 60 °C water bath for 10 min. After filtering with filter paper, 1 mL of filtrate was added into 4.5 mL of ammonium chloride buffer and then 2.5 mL of 60% acetic acid, 2.5 mL of 1 gL−1 N-1-naphthylethylenediamine solution and 2.5 mL of 10gL−1 p-aminobenzene sulfonic acid were added in turn. The mixture was placed for 25 min at room temperature and the absorbance was measured at 550 nm [68]. For ammonium N, 1 g of dry sample powder was mixed with 10 mL of deionized water for 12 h. After filtering, 4 mL of filtrate was added into 1 mL of TCA and the mixture was held at 4 °C for 12 h. After being centrifuged at 10,000× g for 5 min, 50 μL of the supernatant was mixed with 50 μL of distilled water, 2.5 mL of phenol reagent, and 2 mL of sodium hypochlorite, and then the mixture was heated in a 95 °C water bath for 5 min. The absorbance of the mixture was detected at 630 nm [69].
For GOGAT and GDH activities, 0.15 g of leaf tissues was ground with 2 mL of 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.6) containing 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA and 1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, and the homogenate was centrifuged at 12,000× g for 30 min. The supernatant was used for analyzing enzyme activities. For GOGAT activity, the reaction mixture contained 0.4 mL of 20 mM L-glutamine, 0.05 mL of 0.1 M α-ketoglutaric acid, 0.1 mL of 10 mM potassium chloride, 0.2 mL of 3 mM NADH, 0.5 mL of the supernatant, and 1.75 mL of 25 mM Tris-HCL buffer (pH 7.6). The reaction started with the addition of L-glutamine and the absorbance was recorded immediately at 340 nm (OD1), and then the absorbance was recorded again at 340 nm after 3 min (OD2) [70]. For GDH activity, the reaction mixture contained 0.3 mL of 0.1 M α-ketoglutaric acid, 0.3 mL of 1 M NH4Cl, 0.2 mL of 3 M NADH, 1 mL of the supernatant, and 1.2 mL of 0.2 M Tris-HCL buffer (pH 8.0). The absorbance of the reaction solution was recorded immediately at 340 nm (OD1), and then the absorbance was recorded again at 340 nm after 3 min (OD2) [71]. The Glu content (Art. No. GLU-2-Y), NR activity (Art. No. NR-2-Y), NiR activity (Art. No. NIR-2-G) and NO content (Art. No. NO-2-G) were measured using Assay Kits from Suzhou Comin Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China. GABA content (Art. No. ml027467) was measured using a kit sold by mlbio Good elisakit producers, Shanghai, China. The GS activity (Art. No. G0401F) and GAD activity (Art. No. G1102F) were measured using a kit sold by Suzhou Grace Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China. The NOA activity (Art. No. A014-2-2) was measured using the Assay Kit (NanJing Jian Cheng Bioengineering Institute., China). For the determination of these parameters, 0.2 g leaf samples were used for a replicate of each treatment.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

All data was analyzed by using SPSS 20 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and the SAS (SAS 9.1, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Differences among treatments were determined by using the Fisher’s protected least significance difference (LSD) test at P ≤ 0.05. The two-way ANOVA was made before using Fisher’s LSD.

5. Conclusions

Water stress caused leaf water deficit, Chl loss, oxidative damage, N insufficiency and metabolic disturbances in creeping bentgrass. However, the exogenous addition of GABA effectively alleviated water stress damage, including reductions in oxidative damage, photoinhibition, and water and Chl loss, which could be related to the GABA-induced improvement of OA and antioxidant defense. GABA supply not only provided more available N, but also affected N metabolism through activating NR and GS activities when creeping bentgrass was exposed to water stress. The exogenous addition of GABA did not increase glutamate content and GAD activity, but enhanced GDH activity, which might indicate that GABA promoted the conversion and utilization of glutamate for maintaining Chl synthesis and the TCA cycle in creeping bentgrass under water stress. In addition, GABA-induced NO production, dependent on the NOA and NR pathways, could be associated with the enhancement of antioxidant defenses in creeping bentgrass. Current findings further reveal the critical role of GABA in regulating signal transduction and metabolic homeostasis in plants under water stress.

Author Contributions

Z.L. conceived the research and designed experiments; M.T., L.L., B.C., and W.Z. performed the experiments; M.T. and Y.Z. analyzed the data; M.T. and Z.L. wrote the manuscript; M.T., Z.L., and Y.P. discussed the results, Y.P., and Y.Z. reviewed the manuscript. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2018M630086) and the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (Grant No. 2017HH0060).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

GABAγ-aminobutyric acid
PEG-6000polyethylene glycol-6000
SODsuperoxide dismutase
CATcatalase
PODperoxidase
APXascorbate peroxidase
DRdehydroascorbate reductase
GRglutathione reductase
MRmonodehydroascorbate reductase
RWCrelative water content
WUEwater use efficiency
Pn netphotosynthetic rate
ELelectrolyte leakage
OPosmotic potential
OAosmotic adjustment
Chltotal chlorophyll
TCAtricarboxylic acid
NOnitric oxide
NOANO-associated protein
NRnitrate reductase
NiRnitrite reductase
Gluglutamate
GSglutamine synthetase
GOGATglutamate synthase
GDHglutamate dehydrogenase
GADglutamate decarboxylase
PGRsplant growth regulators
ROSreactive oxygen species
MDAmalondialdehyde
O2superoxide anion
H2O2hydrogen peroxide

References

  1. Hu, L.X.; Wang, Z.L.; Huang, B.R. Diffusion limitations and metabolic factors associated with inhibition and recovery of photosynthesis from drought stress in a C perennial grass species. Physiol. Plant. 2010, 139, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nadeem, S.M.; Khan, M.Y.; Waqas, M.R. Arbuscular mycorrhizas and stress tolerance of drought stress in plants. In Arbuscular Mycorrhizas and Stress Tolerance of Plants; Wu, Q.S., Zuo, Y.N., Eds.; Springer: Gateway East, Singapore, 2017; pp. 25–41. [Google Scholar]
  3. Li, Z.; Zhou, H.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, X.; Ma, X.; Huang, L.; Yan, Y. Exogenously applied spermidine improves drought tolerance in creeping bentgrass associated with changes in antioxidant defense, endogenous polyamines and phytohormones. Plant Growth Regul. 2015, 76, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bian, X.J.; Merewitz, E.; Huang, B.R. Effects of trinexapac-ethyl on drought responses in creeping bentgrass associated with water use and osmotic adjustment. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 2009, 134, 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Bouché, N.; Fromm, H. GABA in plants: Just a metabolite? Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gilliham, M.; Tyerman, S.D. Linking metabolism to membrane signaling: The GABA–malate connection. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 136–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Serraj, R.; Shelp, B.J.; Sinclair, T.R. Accumulation of γ-aminobutyric acid in nodulated soybean in response to drought stress. Physiol. Plant. 1998, 102, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, T.; Liu, Z.; Li, Z.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, X.; Ma, X.; Huang, L.; Liu, W.; Nie, G.; He, L. Regulation of heat shock factor pathways by γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) associated with thermotolerance of creeping bentgrass. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Liu, C.; Zhao, L.; Yu, G. The dominant glutamic acid metabolic flux to produce γ-amino butyric acid over proline in Nicotiana tabacum leaves under water stress relates to its significant role in antioxidant activity. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2011, 8, 608–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ramesh, S.A.; Tyerman, S.D.; Xu, B.; Bose, J.; Kaur, S.; Conn, V.; Domingos, P.; Ullah, S.; Wege, S.; Shabala, S.; et al. GABA signalling modulates plant growth by directly regulating the activity of plant-specific anion transporters. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Allan, W.L.; Shelp, B.J. Fluctuations of γ-aminobutyrate, γ-hydroxybutyrate, and related amino acids in Arabidopsis leaves as a function of the light–dark cycle, leaf age, and N stress. Can. J. Bot. 2006, 84, 1339–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nayyar, H.; Kaur, R.; Kaur, S.; Singh, R. γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) imparts partial protection from heat stress injury to rice seedlings by improving leaf turgor and upregulating osmoprotectants and antioxidants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 33, 408–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Robertson, G.P.; Vitousek, P.M. Nitrogen in agriculture: Balancing the cost of an essential resource. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2009, 34, 97–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Sun, W.; Huang, Y.; Chen, S.; Zou, J.; Zheng, X. Dependence of wheat and rice respiration on tissue nitrogen and the corresponding net carbon fixation efficiency under different rates of nitrogen application. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 2007, 24, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhong, C.; Cao, X.; Hu, J.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, J.; Huang, J.; Jin, Q. Nitrogen metabolism in adaptation of photosynthesis to water stress in rice grown under different nitrogen levels. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Tawfik, A.A.; Kleinhenz, M.D.; Palta, J.P. Application of calcium and nitrogen for mitigating heat stress effects on potatoes. Amer. Potato. J. 1996, 73, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jespersen, D.; Huang, B. Proteins associated with heat-induced leaf senescence in creeping bentgrass as affected by foliar application of nitrogen, cytokinins, and an ethylene inhibitor. Proteomics. 2015, 4, 798–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Arasimowicz, M.; Floryszak-Wołyńska, J. Nitric oxide as a bioactive signalling molecule in plant stress responses. Plant Sci. 2007, 172, 876–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rockel, P.; Kaiser, W.M. NO production in plants: Nitrate reductase versus nitric oxide synthase. In Progress in Botany; Esser, K., Beyschlag, W., Hellwig, F., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2002; Volume 63, pp. 246–257. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang, H.; Shen, W.B.; Xu, L.L. Effects of nitric oxide on the germination of wheat seeds and its reactive oxygen species metabolisms under osmotic stress. J. Bot. 2003, 45, 87–100. [Google Scholar]
  21. Uchida, A.; TJagendorf, A.; Hibino, T.; Takabe, T.; Takabe, T. Effects of hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide on both salt and heat stress tolerance in rice. Plant. Sci. 2002, 163, 515–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tian, X.; Lei, Y. Nitric oxide treatment alleviates drought stress in wheat seedlings. Biol. Plant. 2006, 50, 775–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fu, J.J.; Chu, X.F.; Sun, Y.F.; Xu, Y.F.; Hu, T.M. Involvement of nitric oxide in 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced antioxidant defense in roots of Elymus nutans exposed to cold stress. Biol. Plant. 2016, 60, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Han, Y.J.; Cho, K.C.; Hwang, O.J.; Choi, Y.S.; Shin, A.Y.; Hwang, I.; Kim, J. Overexpression of an Arabidopsis β-glucosidase gene enhances drought resistance with dwarf phenotype in creeping bentgrass. Plant Cell Rep. 2012, 31, 1677–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Riseman, A.R.A.; Jensen, C.J.C.; Williams, M.W.M. Stomatal conductivity and osmotic adjustment during acclimation to multiple cycles of drought stress in potted miniature rose. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 2001, 76, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Meng, X.; Wang, M.; Jiang, N.; Zhang, D.; Wang, L.; Liu, C. Regulation of both the reactive oxygen species level and antioxidant enzyme activity in drought stressed rice organs by benzimidazolate based SOD1 mimics. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 11211–11221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhang, R.H.; Xue, J.Q.; Pu, J.; Zhao, B.; Bu, L.D. Influence of drought stress on plant growth and photosynthetic traits in maize seedlings. Acta Agron. Sinica. 2011, 37, 521–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Farooq, M.; Wahid, A.; Kobayashi, N.; Fujita, D.; Basra, S.M.A. Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2009, 29, 185–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Lee, K.C.; Campbell, R.W.; Paulsen, G.M. Effects of drought stress and succinic acid-2,2-dimethylhydrazide treatment on water relations and photosynthesis in pea seedlings. Crop Sci. 1974, 14, 279–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dwyer, L.M.; Stewart, D.W.; Tollenaar, M. Analysis of maize leaf photosynthesis under drought stress. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1992, 72, 477–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, Z.; Yu, J.; Peng, Y. Metabolic pathways regulated by abscisic acid, salicylic acid, and γ-aminobutyric acid in association with improved drought tolerance in creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera). Physiol Plant. 2017, 159, 42–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Helena, M.; Carvalho, M. Drought stress and reactive oxygen species: Production, scavenging and signaling. Plant Signal. Behav. 2008, 3, 156–165. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hernández, I.; Cela, J.; Alegre, L.; Munné-Bosch, S. Antioxidant defenses against drought stress. In Plant Responses to Drought Stress; Aroca, R., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 823, pp. 231–258. [Google Scholar]
  34. Fedorova, M.; Bollineni, R.C.; Hoffmann, R. Protein carbonylation as a major hallmark of oxidative damage: Update of analytical strategies. Mass. Spectrom. Rev. 2014, 33, 79–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Li, Z.; Peng, Y.; Huang, B. Alteration of transcripts of stress-protective genes and transcriptional factors by γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) associated with improved heat and drought tolerance in creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Nicolas, B.; Fait, A.; Zik, M. The root-specific glutamate decarboxylase (GAD1) is essential for sustaining GABA levels in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2004, 55, 315–325. [Google Scholar]
  37. Miyashita, Y.; Good, A.G. Contribution of the GABA shunt to hypoxia-induced alanine accumulation in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008, 49, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Esteban, R.; Ariz, I.; Cruz, C.; Moran, J.F. Mechanisms of ammonium toxicity and the quest for tolerance. Plant Sci. 2016, 248, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Qin, S.; Zhao, D.; Lü, D.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, G.; Ma, H. Effects of water stress on carbon and nitrogen metabolism of hanfu apple leaves. J. Jilin. Agr. 2010, 32, 402–406. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhen, A.; Hu, X.H.; Ren, W.Q.; Su, C.J.; Jin, X.Q.; Sun, X.P. Effect of exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid on NO3--N assimilation in muskmelon under Ca(NO3)2 stress. Indian. J. Plant Physiol. 1984, 27, 3987–3995. [Google Scholar]
  41. Bernard, S.M.; Habash, D.Z. The importance of cytosolic glutamine synthetase in nitrogen assimilation and recycling. New Phytol. 2009, 182, 608–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, J.W.; Liu, Q.; Rong, X.; Xie, G.; Peng, J.; Zhu, H. Effects of different cultivations on activities of nitrogen metabolisms key enzymes of fodder rice. J. Hunan. Agr. 2005, 31, 238–241. [Google Scholar]
  43. Cao, Z.Z.; Zhang, Q.F.; Wei, K.S.; Yang, W.L.; Liu, G.K.; Cheng, F. Response of some key enzyme activities involved in nitrogen metabolism to high temperature at filling stage and its relation to storage protein accumulation in rice grain. Acta Agron. Sinica. 2013, 38, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, Z.; Yu, J.; Peng, Y.; Huang, B. Metabolic pathways regulated by γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) contributing to heat tolerance in creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera). Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Pedroso, M.C.; Magalhaes, J.R.; Durzan, D. Nitric oxide induces cell death in Taxus cells. Plant Sci. 2000, 157, 178–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yamasaki, H.; Sakihama, Y. Simultaneous production of nitric oxide and peroxynitrite by plant nitrate reductase: In vitro evidence for the NR-dependent formation of active nitrogen species. FEBS Lett. 2000, 468, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Yamasaki, H.; Sakihama, Y.; Takahashi, S. An alternative pathway for nitric oxide production in plants: New features of an old enzyme. Trends Plant Sci. 1999, 4, 128–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Stöhr, C.; Strube, F.; Marx, G.; Ullrich, W.R.; Rockel, P. A plasma membrane-bound enzyme of tobacco roots catalyses the formation of nitric oxide from nitrite. Planta 2001, 212, 835–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Astier, J.; Gross, I.; Durner, J. Nitric oxide production in plants: An update. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 3401–3411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Peng, D.; Wang, X.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Peng, Y.; Li, Y.; He, X.; Zhang, X.; Ma, X.; Huang, L.; et al. NO is involved in spermidine-induced drought tolerance in white clover via activation of antioxidant enzymes and genes. Protoplasma. 2016, 253, 1243–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fan, H.; Li, T.; Guan, L.; Li, Z.; Guo, N.; Cai, Y.; Lin, Y. Effects of exogenous nitric oxide on antioxidation and DNA methylation of Dendrobium huoshanense grown under drought stress. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2012, 109, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hoagland, D.R.; Arnon, D.I. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agr. 1950, 347, 357–359. [Google Scholar]
  53. Li, Z.; Peng, Y.; Huang, B. Physiological effects of γ-aminobutyric acid application on improving heat and drought tolerance in creeping bentgrass. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 2016, 141, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Blum, A.; Ebercon, A. Cell membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Crop Sci. 1981, 21, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Barrs, H.D.; Weatherley, P.E. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1962, 15, 413–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Blum, A. Osmotic adjustment and growth of barley genotypes under drought stress. Crop Sci. 1989, 29, 230–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Feng, Y.L.; Cao, K.F. Photosynthetic characteristics, dark respiration, and leaf mass per unit area in seedlings of four tropical tree species grown under three irradiances. Photosynthetica. 2004, 42, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Velikova, V.; Yordanov, I.; Edreva, A. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants: Protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Sci. 2000, 151, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Elstner, E.F.; Heupel, A. Inhibition of nitrite formation from hydroxylammoniumchloride: A simple assay for superoxide dismutase. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 70, 616–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dhindsa, R.S.; Plumb-Dhindsa, P.; Thorpe, T.A. Leaf Senescence: Correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation, and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase. J. Exp. Bot. 1981, 32, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Giannopolitis, C.N.; Ries, G.K. Superoxide dismutases: I. occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 1977, 59, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chance, B.; Maehly, A.C. Assay of catalases and peroxidases. Methods Enzymol. 1955, 2, 764–775. [Google Scholar]
  64. Nakano, Y.; Asada, K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 1981, 22, 867–880. [Google Scholar]
  65. Cakmak, I.; Strbac, D.; Marschner, H. Activities of hydrogen peroxide scavenging enzymes in germinating wheat seeds. J. Exp. Bot. 1993, 44, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bremner, J.M. Determination of nitrogen in soil by the Kjeldahl method. J. Agr. Sci. 1960, 55, 11–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, X.; Wang, J.; Li, L.; Xie, X.; Cao, Z. Effects of sulfur and salicylic acid on nitrate accumulation and nitrogen metabolism in leaves of Chinese chive. J. Plant Nutr. Fert. 2013, 19, 1264–1271. [Google Scholar]
  68. Rathore, D.P.S.; Tarafder, P.K. A rapid spectrophotometric method for the determination of nitrite in water. J. Indian. Chem. Soc. 1989, 66, 185–187. [Google Scholar]
  69. Sahrawat, K.L.; Prasad, R. A rapid method for determination of nitrate, nitrite, and ammoniacal nitrogen in soils. Plant Siol. 1975, 42, 305–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Singh, R.P.; Srivastava, H.S. Increase in glutamate synthase activity (NADH-dependent) in excised root and leaf of maize seedlings in response to acidic amino acids and amides. Physiol. Plant. 1987, 182, 497–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kanamori, T.; Konishi, S.; Takahashi, E. Inducible formation of glutamate dehydrogenase in rice plant roots by the addition of ammonia to the media. Physiol. Plant. 1972, 26, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) pretreatment on (A) phenotype, (B) relative water content (RWC), (C) osmotic adjustment (OA), (D) water use efficiency (WUE) and (E) electrolyte leakage (EL) in leaves of creeping bentgrass under non-stress and water stress conditions. Vertical bars above curves in (A) or (B) represent the least significant difference (LSD) values at a particular day (n = 4; P ≤ 0.05). Vertical bars above the columns in (C) or (D) indicate ± SE of mean (n = 4) and different letters above columns indicate significant difference at a particular day based on the LSD (P ≤ 0.05). C, well-watered control; GABA, well-watered control pretreated with GABA; PEG, PEG-induced water stress; GABA + PEG, water-stressed plants pretreated with GABA.
Figure 1. Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) pretreatment on (A) phenotype, (B) relative water content (RWC), (C) osmotic adjustment (OA), (D) water use efficiency (WUE) and (E) electrolyte leakage (EL) in leaves of creeping bentgrass under non-stress and water stress conditions. Vertical bars above curves in (A) or (B) represent the least significant difference (LSD) values at a particular day (n = 4; P ≤ 0.05). Vertical bars above the columns in (C) or (D) indicate ± SE of mean (n = 4) and different letters above columns indicate significant difference at a particular day based on the LSD (P ≤ 0.05). C, well-watered control; GABA, well-watered control pretreated with GABA; PEG, PEG-induced water stress; GABA + PEG, water-stressed plants pretreated with GABA.
Ijms 21 07460 g001
Figure 2. Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) pretreatment on (A) total chlorophyll content, (B) chlorophyll a/b, and (C) net photosynthetic rate in leaves of creeping bentgrass under non-stress and water stress conditions. Vertical bars indicate ± SE of mean (n = 4). Different letters above columns indicate significant difference at a particular day based on the LSD (P ≤ 0.05). C, well-watered control; GABA, well-watered control pretreated with GABA; PEG, PEG-induced water stress; GABA + PEG, water-stressed plants pretreated with GABA.
Figure 2. Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) pretreatment on (A) total chlorophyll content, (B) chlorophyll a/b, and (C) net photosynthetic rate in leaves of creeping bentgrass under non-stress and water stress conditions. Vertical bars indicate ± SE of mean (n = 4). Different letters above columns indicate significant difference at a particular day based on the LSD (P ≤ 0.05). C, well-watered control; GABA, well-watered control pretreated with GABA; PEG, PEG-induced water stress; GABA + PEG, water-stressed plants pretreated with GABA.
Ijms 21 07460 g002
Figure 3. Effects of exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) pretreatment on (A) superoxide anion (O2) content, (B) hydrogen peroxide(H2O2) content, (C) malondialdehyde (MDA) content, and (D) protein carbonyl content in leaves of creeping bentgrass under non-stress and water stress conditions. Vertical bars indicate ± SE of mean (n = 4). Different letters above columns indicate significant difference based on the LSD (P ≤ 0.05). C, well-watered control; GABA, well-watered control pretreated with GABA; PEG, PEG-induced water stress; GABA + PEG, water-stressed plants pretreated with GABA.
Figure 3. Effects of exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) pretreatment on (A) superoxide anion (O2) content, (B) hydrogen peroxide(H2O2) content, (C) malondialdehyde (MDA) content, and (D) protein carbonyl content in leaves of creeping bentgrass under non-stress and water stress conditions. Vertical bars indicate ± SE of mean (n = 4). Different letters above columns indicate significant difference based on the LSD (P ≤ 0.05). C, well-watered control; GABA, well-watered control pretreated with GABA; PEG, PEG-induced water stress; GABA + PEG, water-stressed plants pretreated with GABA.
Ijms 21 07460 g003
Figure 4. Effects of exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) pretreatment on antioxidant enzyme activity in leaves of creeping bentgrass under non-stress and water stress conditions. SOD, superoxide dismutase activity; CAT, catalase activity; POD, guaiacol peroxidase activity; APX, ascorbate peroxidase activity; DR, dehydroascorbate reductase activity; GR, glutathione reductase activity; MR, monodehydroascorbate reductase activity. Vertical bars indicate ± SE of mean (n = 4). Different letters above columns indicate significant difference based on the LSD (P ≤ 0.05). C, well-watered control; GABA, well-watered control pretreated with GABA; PEG, PEG-induced water stress; GABA + PEG, water-stressed plants pretreated with GABA.
Figure 4. Effects of exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) pretreatment on antioxidant enzyme activity in leaves of creeping bentgrass under non-stress and water stress conditions. SOD, superoxide dismutase activity; CAT, catalase activity; POD, guaiacol peroxidase activity; APX, ascorbate peroxidase activity; DR, dehydroascorbate reductase activity; GR, glutathione reductase activity; MR, monodehydroascorbate reductase activity. Vertical bars indicate ± SE of mean (n = 4). Different letters above columns indicate significant difference based on the LSD (P ≤ 0.05). C, well-watered control; GABA, well-watered control pretreated with GABA; PEG, PEG-induced water stress; GABA + PEG, water-stressed plants pretreated with GABA.
Ijms 21 07460 g004
Figure 5. Effects of exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) pretreatment on (A) total nitrogen content, (B) nitrate nitrogen content, (C) nitrite nitrogen content and (D) ammoniacal nitrogen content in leaves of creeping bentgrass under non-stress and water stress conditions. Vertical bars indicate ± SE of mean (n = 4). Different letters above columns indicate significant difference based on the LSD (P ≤ 0.05). C, well-watered control; GABA, well-watered control pretreated with GABA; PEG, PEG-induced water stress; GABA + PEG, water-stressed plants pretreated with GABA.
Figure 5. Effects of exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) pretreatment on (A) total nitrogen content, (B) nitrate nitrogen content, (C) nitrite nitrogen content and (D) ammoniacal nitrogen content in leaves of creeping bentgrass under non-stress and water stress conditions. Vertical bars indicate ± SE of mean (n = 4). Different letters above columns indicate significant difference based on the LSD (P ≤ 0.05). C, well-watered control; GABA, well-watered control pretreated with GABA; PEG, PEG-induced water stress; GABA + PEG, water-stressed plants pretreated with GABA.
Ijms 21 07460 g005
Figure 6. Effects of exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) pretreatment on (A) nitrate reductase activity, (B) nitrite reductase activity, (C) glutamine synthetase activity, and (D) glutamate synthase activity in leaves of creeping bentgrass under non-stress and water stress conditions. Vertical bars indicate ± SE of mean (n = 4). Different letters above columns indicate significant difference at a particular day based on the LSD (P ≤ 0.05). C, well-watered control; GABA, well-watered control pretreated with GABA; PEG, PEG-induced water stress; GABA + PEG, water-stressed plants pretreated with GABA.
Figure 6. Effects of exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) pretreatment on (A) nitrate reductase activity, (B) nitrite reductase activity, (C) glutamine synthetase activity, and (D) glutamate synthase activity in leaves of creeping bentgrass under non-stress and water stress conditions. Vertical bars indicate ± SE of mean (n = 4). Different letters above columns indicate significant difference at a particular day based on the LSD (P ≤ 0.05). C, well-watered control; GABA, well-watered control pretreated with GABA; PEG, PEG-induced water stress; GABA + PEG, water-stressed plants pretreated with GABA.
Ijms 21 07460 g006
Figure 7. Effects of exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) pretreatment on (A) nitric oxide content, (B) NO-associated protein activity in leaves of creeping bentgrass under non-stress and water stress conditions. Vertical bars indicate ± SE of mean (n = 4). Different letters above columns indicate significant difference at a particular day based on the LSD (P ≤ 0.05). C, well-watered control; GABA, well-watered control pretreated with GABA; PEG, PEG-induced water stress; GABA + PEG, water-stressed plants pretreated with GABA.
Figure 7. Effects of exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) pretreatment on (A) nitric oxide content, (B) NO-associated protein activity in leaves of creeping bentgrass under non-stress and water stress conditions. Vertical bars indicate ± SE of mean (n = 4). Different letters above columns indicate significant difference at a particular day based on the LSD (P ≤ 0.05). C, well-watered control; GABA, well-watered control pretreated with GABA; PEG, PEG-induced water stress; GABA + PEG, water-stressed plants pretreated with GABA.
Ijms 21 07460 g007
Figure 8. Effects of exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) pretreatment on (A) glutamate content, (B) γ-aminobutyric acid content, (C) glutamate dehydrogenase activity, and (D) glutamate decarboxylase activity in the leaves of creeping bentgrass under non-stress and water stress conditions. Vertical bars indicate ± SE of mean (n = 4). Different letters above columns indicate significant difference at a particular day based on the LSD (P ≤ 0.05). C, well-watered control; GABA, well-watered control pretreated with GABA; PEG, PEG-induced water stress; GABA + PEG, water-stressed plants pretreated with GABA.
Figure 8. Effects of exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) pretreatment on (A) glutamate content, (B) γ-aminobutyric acid content, (C) glutamate dehydrogenase activity, and (D) glutamate decarboxylase activity in the leaves of creeping bentgrass under non-stress and water stress conditions. Vertical bars indicate ± SE of mean (n = 4). Different letters above columns indicate significant difference at a particular day based on the LSD (P ≤ 0.05). C, well-watered control; GABA, well-watered control pretreated with GABA; PEG, PEG-induced water stress; GABA + PEG, water-stressed plants pretreated with GABA.
Ijms 21 07460 g008
Figure 9. Integrative pathways induced by water stress and exogenous application of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in leaves of creeping bentgrass under non-stress and water stress conditions. Red indicates a significant upregulation, green indicates a significant downregulation, and white indicates no significant change. C, well-watered control; GABA, well-watered control pretreated with GABA; PEG, PEG-induced water stress; GABA + PEG, water-stressed plants pretreated with GABA.
Figure 9. Integrative pathways induced by water stress and exogenous application of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in leaves of creeping bentgrass under non-stress and water stress conditions. Red indicates a significant upregulation, green indicates a significant downregulation, and white indicates no significant change. C, well-watered control; GABA, well-watered control pretreated with GABA; PEG, PEG-induced water stress; GABA + PEG, water-stressed plants pretreated with GABA.
Ijms 21 07460 g009

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tang, M.; Li, Z.; Luo, L.; Cheng, B.; Zhang, Y.; Zeng, W.; Peng, Y. Nitric Oxide Signal, Nitrogen Metabolism, and Water Balance Affected by γ-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) in Relation to Enhanced Tolerance to Water Stress in Creeping Bentgrass. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7460. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207460

AMA Style

Tang M, Li Z, Luo L, Cheng B, Zhang Y, Zeng W, Peng Y. Nitric Oxide Signal, Nitrogen Metabolism, and Water Balance Affected by γ-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) in Relation to Enhanced Tolerance to Water Stress in Creeping Bentgrass. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(20):7460. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207460

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tang, Mingyan, Zhou Li, Ling Luo, Bizhen Cheng, Youzhi Zhang, Weihang Zeng, and Yan Peng. 2020. "Nitric Oxide Signal, Nitrogen Metabolism, and Water Balance Affected by γ-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) in Relation to Enhanced Tolerance to Water Stress in Creeping Bentgrass" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 20: 7460. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207460

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop