Next Article in Journal
Comparative Analyses of Anatomical Structure, Phytohormone Levels, and Gene Expression Profiles Reveal Potential Dwarfing Mechanisms in Shengyin Bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis f. tubaeformis)
Previous Article in Journal
The Multifaceted Role of STAT3 in Mammary Gland Involution and Breast Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Graphene Quantum Dots and Enzyme-Coupled Biosensor for Highly Sensitive Determination of Hydrogen Peroxide and Glucose

1
College of Food Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130062, China
2
Key Laboratory of Bionic Engineering (Ministry of Education), College of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130022, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(6), 1696; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19061696
Submission received: 7 May 2018 / Revised: 25 May 2018 / Accepted: 28 May 2018 / Published: 7 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)

Abstract

:
In this paper, a simple and specific graphene quantum dots (GQDs)-based fluorescent biosensor adopted for the determination of glucose based on the combination of the enzyme-coupled method and fluorescence quenching mechanism is demonstrated. Glucose was oxidized by the enzyme glucose oxidase (GOx), forming hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) via the catalysis by horseradish peroxidase (HRP). H 2 O 2 was then employed to oxidize phenol to quinone, which led to effective quenching effect in the GQDs–GOx–HRP–phenol system. By optimizing the reaction conditions of the GQDs-enzyme system, a linear relationship between the concentration of glucose and the fluorescence intensity over a range of 0.2–10 μ mol/L was obtained. The limit of detection for glucose is 0.08 μ mol/L. The present biosensor for the determination of glucose showed satisfactory reproducibility and accuracy in human serum samples. Since the enzymes have high specificity and unique affinity to the certain substance, the enzyme-coupled system promises a sensitive way for further detection of those chemicals which could be oxidized by enzymes and generated H 2 O 2 or glucose. GQDs and other fluorescent materials coupled with several enzymes can be applied to extensive sensing field.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Glucose is a basic and widely-used monosaccharide that can be found easily in both human bodies and other species. Glucose acts as the raw material and the intermediate product of respiration and metabolism, and an unbalanced glucose level in the human body can lead to such disease as diabetes which is considered a principal health problem that negatively affects millions of people in the world [1,2]. Glucose monitoring and diabetes diagnostic have been continuous concerns among the public. The fast and accurate monitoring of glucose level, mainly in blood, is necessary for diagnostic and treatment [3,4]. In recent years, various kinds of methods have been applied in glucose quantitative analysis in different samples, including electrometric [5], voltammetric [6], colorimetric [7] and fluorimetric detection [8,9]. Fluorescence detection is a current research interest in analyzing food [10], diagnosing of diabetes [11,12], etc. Because of the convenient implementation and high sensitivity, several types of bio-probes have been made using enzymes and some fluorescent material for fast and deep sensing detection [13,14].
Enzymes and coenzymes have been extensively used in sensing system owing to their high activity and specificity, acting as biosensors in the electrochemical and optical area [15,16]. They are capable of changing function and structure, thus frequently modified onto the sensor or added in the solution to accelerate or change the process [17,18]. Compared with the electrochemical methods, optical methods are more reliable in low concentration analyte detection using the UV and fluorescence spectra. For instance, glucose oxidase, lactate enzyme, and galactose oxidase have been extensively exploited [15,19]. Glucose oxidase (GOx), because of its stability and sensitivity, is practicable in glucose detecting. GOx, based on a well-founded mechanism, is broadly used. During the process, glucose is oxidized by O 2 with GOx, generating gluconolactone and H 2 O 2 as oxidation products [20]. Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) is a kind of practicable enzyme in detecting H 2 O 2 in the presence of hydrogen donor; the reaction between HRP and H 2 O 2 is rapid and specific [21]. In recent years, due to the targeting function, those reactions based on enzymes received a great deal of attention.
Graphene quantum dots (GQDs) and its derivatives have been an area of intense investigation [22,23,24,25,26]. Graphene has been detected and used for years due to its excellent proprieties. When the size of quantum is <100 nm, the GQDs showed superior properties due to its specific nanometer size effect and specific shape [27,28]. Compared with common carbon dots [29], GQDs has drawn more and more attention these years, owing to its extraordinary properties and functions, including low toxicity [30], high fluorescence activity [31], high solubility [32], unique biocompatibility [33], and long-term resistance to photo-bleaching as well as the feasibility of functionalization at their edges [22,34]. Therefore, many experimental works, including Pb 2 + [35], Cu 2 + [36], Hg 2 + [37], Mn 2 + [38], Ag + [39], Ce 4 + [40], DHB [41], glucose [42], and telomere DNA [43] detection are based on its ultrahigh sensitivity and unique electronic and chemical properties.
This study applied a novel Graphene quantum dots (GQDs)-based fluorescent bio-probe for the analysis of glucose value, combining the enzymatic reaction and the quenching effect of GQDs. H 2 O 2 formed in the glucose oxidation reaction catalyzed by GOx, and upon the addition of HRP and phenol, the phenol oxidized as caused by H 2 O 2 and HRP [44] to quinone compounds, which could efficiently quench the fluorescence intensity of GQDs [41]. The quenching fluorescence intensity is proportional to the concentration of glucose. Compared with other works, the enzyme-coupled biosensor is much more selective and sensitive for the determination of glucose due to specific characteristics of enzymes. The determination of glucose is based on the combined effect of GOx and HRP, eliminating the common interference factors. The proposed method can pave the way for sensitive detection of analytes that can generate glucose and H 2 O 2 such as lactate, cholesterol, glycogen, ascorbic acid (AA) and uric acid (UA). By combining GQDs or other fluorescent materials with enzymes, bi-enzymes or multi-enzymes biosensors can be synthesized and utilized for particularly effective analysis.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. GQDs Characterization

After the preparation of GQDs, the prepared GQDs were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). As shown in Figure 1, the diameters of the GQDs are mainly distributed in the range of 10–20 nm. The above-observed properties were consistent with a previous report [25].

2.2. Detection Principle of the Enzyme-Coupled Biosensor

The principle of GQD-glucose detection is based on the combination of glucose enzyme reaction and the quenching effect of quinone produced on the GQDs, and the idea of the sensing system is illustrated in Scheme 1. Glucose could cause the quenching effect of GQDs in GOx–HRP–phenol system. Several experiments based on control variate methods have been carried out, the fluorescence emissions were investigated, and the results are shown below. In Figure 2, in the presence of different concentrations of H 2 O 2 , the fluorescence emission of GQDs did not show apparent changes, suggesting that there was no interaction between GQDs and H 2 O 2 . According to a well-founded reaction mentioned above, glucose is oxidized by O 2 and GOx and produced H 2 O 2 and gluconolactone [45]. Thus, the influence of mere addition of glucose and GOx in the GQDs sensing system was very slight. Nevertheless, as shown in Figure 3, when glucose, GOx, HRP, phenol were added simultaneously to the GQDs solution, a significant decrease in fluorescence intensity could be observed. For the selectivity of GOx, the level of H 2 O 2 is hinged on the concentration of glucose. In contrast to the first experiment, upon addition of phenol and HRP, phenol acted as hydrogen donor, which could rapidly and specifically be oxidized by H 2 O 2 via catalysis by HRP, and generated quinone [18,46]. The primary oxidized product, quinone, was a good electron acceptor and efficiently transferred the electron from the excited GQDs [47], causing a considerable quenching effect of the fluorescent system [48]. The spectral results mentioned above provide evidence that, under the same condition, with the presence of GOx, HRP and phenol, glucose can be oxidized; the quinone generated is a suitable quencher in the assay; and the glucose concentration can effectively influence the fluorescence quenching degree of the system.

2.3. Optimization of the GQDs–GOx–HRP–Phenol Sensing System

As the H 2 O 2 concentration is related to the different addition of the glucose oxidase, to further increase the sensitivity of the system, different concentrations of the glucose oxidase (GOx) were added to the system that includes glucose, GQDs, phenol, and HRP under the same conditions, and the results were investigated by measuring the fluorescence spectra immediately. In Figure 4, it is clear that the quenching effect enhanced with the increasing concentration of GOx until the addition achieved 0.5 mM. The fluorescence intensity attained the minimum value at 1.0 mM. However, considering the high enzyme cost, 0.5 mM glucose oxidase was a suitable concentration for the following experiments.
To detect the response time of the fluorescence intensity of catalyzed oxidation and GQDs to glucose, the time-dependent fluorescence changes of the system were observed, as shown in Figure 5. The red curve is with the absence of glucose, and the black curve shows the system including glucose. It is obvious that, upon the addition of glucose, fluorescence intensity fell considerably as time increased. After incubation time was longer than 80 min, the fluorescence intensity reached plateau and remained nearly unchanged. The reaction was completed within 80 min. In this study, the incubation time of 80 min was used to establish the optimal condition.

2.4. Detection of Glucose via the GQDs–GOx–HRP–Phenol Sensing System

To evaluate the sensitivity of this biosensor system to glucose, the experiments proceeded under the optimum conditions discussed above. The fluorescence intensity of GQDs–GOx–HRP–phenol system dropped proportionally upon increasing the concentration of glucose, and the maximum wavelength of the system kept constant (see Figure 6). Adding more glucose generated more quencher through the double enzyme reaction and enhanced the quenching effect on GQDs. As shown in the inset of Figure 6, glucose concentration showed a good linear correlation to I/I 0 in the range of 0.2–10 μ M (R 2 = 0.999) (I and I 0 were the fluorescence intensities of the GQDs–HRP–phenol system in the presence and absence of glucose, respectively). The regression equation for this method can be described as I/I 0 = 0.991 − 0.0896C g l u c o s e ( μ M) and the corresponding detection limit (LOD) was 0.08 μ M, which was calculated as 3 σ /s. The LOD is much lower than most previous reported colorimetric, electrochemical and fluorescent sensors for glucose detection (Table 1).

2.5. Selectivity of the GQDs–GOx–HRP–Phenol Sensing System for Detecting Glucose

To test whether this GQDs–GOx–HRP–phenol sensing system is selective toward glucose, the fluorescence changes were measured upon the addition of eight potential substances that commonly exist in the human body,: Mg 2 + , Zn 2 + , Ca 2 + , Na + , K + , pepsin, BSA, GSH, and Cys. As the results in Figure 7 show, the fluorescence intensity observed of the GQDs–GOx–HRP–phenol sensing system did not change obviously over the high concentration of interference, which suggests that the present approach has excellent selectivity in detecting glucose with various kinds of substances. The high selectivity can be attributed to the specificity between enzyme and substrate: GOx is selective toward glucose and HRP is selective toward H 2 O 2 , while other interferents cannot bind the enzyme and the biosensor has strong anti-interference ability.

2.6. Application of Assaying Glucose Concentration in Human Serum Samples

To evaluate the applicability of the GQDs–GOx–HRP–phenol sensing system in the biological environment, we measured the fluorescence intensities of human serum samples spiked with glucose, and calculated the glucose concentration, recoveries and relative standard deviations (RSDs) for every system. The measurements of two samples were repeated three times and the results obtained from three separate experiments showed good repeatability, as listed in Table 2. The samples spiked with different concentrations showed good recoveries in the range of 98.5–102.0%, RSDs were less than ±5%, and the results were consistent with those obtained by medical methods. Therefore, we found that the enzyme-coupled biosensor is reliable and comparable in the determination of glucose in the biological environment.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals and Reagents

In this work, all reagents used were of analytical grade without further purification. Ultrapure water used throughout all experiments was purchased from Hangzhou Wahaha Group Co. Ltd., (Hangzhou, China). Catechol, NaOH, Na 2 HPO 4 , NaH 2 PO 4 , citric acid (CA) and H 2 O 2 were acquired from Beijing Chemical Works (Beijing, China). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP), Pepsin, Bovine serum albumin (BSA), cysteine (Cys), glutathione (GSH), Ascorbic acid, Glutathione and amino acids were obtained from Beijing Dingguo Biotechnology (Beijing, China). Glucose and glucose oxidase (Worthington, Shanghai, China) were purchased from Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). Human serum samples were obtained from the healthy volunteers at the China Japan Union Hospital (Changchun, China) and the samples were prepared and diluted.

3.2. Instrumentation

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained with a JEM2100F high-resolution transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. All measurements of fluorescence were performed under a 360 nm excitation wavelength. All samples were decanted in a standard 1 cm pathway spectrophotometric cuvette. The fluorescence signal corresponded the maximum emission of GQDs well at 466 nm. Records were obtained on a Shimadzu RF-5301 spectrometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Optical measurements were done in aqueous solutions at room temperature.

3.3. Synthesis of GQDs

The GQDs was synthesized in accordance with a method described in previous reports [41,42]. Briefly, 2.0 g citric acid is heated in a 5 mL beaker at approximately 260 C for 17 min to produce molten CA. The light yellow liquid was then introduced into 100 mL of 250 mM NaOH solution with vigorous stirring, neutralizing at a pH of 7.0. The obtained GQDs stored at 4 C for further application.

3.4. Optimization of the Sensing System

For H 2 O 2 detection, H 2 O 2 with different concentrations were freshly prepared and added with 0.5 μ g/mL HRP, 0.05 mM catechol and 10% GQDs followed. All samples were incubated at 37 C for 80 min.
For glucose concentration effect analysis, 10 μ mol/L glucose was added into the system with 5 μ mol/L GQDs, 0.5 μ g/mL HRP, 0.05 mM catechol, and 0.05 mM GOx. All samples were incubated at 37 C for 80 min.
For enzyme concentration effect analysis, fluorescence intensities were detected in the system of 6 μ M glucose, 0.05 mM catechol, 0.5 μ g /mL HRP and 1% GQDs. All samples were incubated at 37 C for 80 min.
For incubation time detection, glucose was added to the system within 5 μ mol/L GQDs, 0.5 μ g/mL HRP, 0.05 mM catechol, 10 μ mol/L glucose and 0.05 mM GOx, and samples were incubated at 37 C for different periods.
All ingredients were blended well under the optimal condition before the fluorescence signal of the mixture was recorded with a luminescence spectrometer.

3.5. Assay of Glucose

The calibration curve of the approach toward glucose was carried out under optimal conditions. Glucose solutions with certain concentrations (0, 0.2, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 9.0, and 10 μ mol/L, respectively) were added into the system with 0.5 μ g/mL HRP, 0.05 mM catechol, 0.05 mM GOx and 5.0 μ mol/L GQDs, respectively. All samples were then diluted to 1.00 mL with PBS (pH 7.4) buffer. The pre-samples (1.0 mL) were shaken evenly before incubated at 37 C for about 80 min. Then, fluorescence spectra were measured by luminescence spectrometer.

3.6. Interference Study

To evaluate the system selectivity toward glucose detection, 500 μ mol solution of other common substances that commonly exist in the human body—Mg 2 + , Zn 2 + , Ca 2 + , Na + , K + , pepsin, BSA, GSH, and Cys — were prepared with 0.5 μ g/mL HRP, 0.05 mM catechol, 0.05 mM GOx and 5.0 μ mol/L GQDs in PBS buffer (pH 7.4), respectively.

3.7. Fluorescence Detection of Glucose in Human Blood Serum

To further test detection in real biological samples, two human blood samples, obtained by venipuncture from drug-free subjects, were used to assess the practicability of the GQDs-double enzyme system. After centrifugation at 10,000 rpm at room temperature for 10 min, the samples offering the best analytical performance for the assay were determined. The supernatant was stored under −20 C as a stock solution before the assay. The reaction serum samples were spiked with various concentrations of glucose and phenol–GQDs–double enzyme system before fluorescence detection.
For the determination of total glucose, human serum samples were prepared and diluted without any pre-treatment, except for a 100 times dilution. The fluorescence spectra for spiked serum samples and serum samples were recorded. By drawing the linear dependence relation of fluorescence intensity and the glucose level, quantification of glucose in the samples could be calculated. The measurement of two samples were repeated three times.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, a simple and sensitive approach for glucose determination based upon the combination between specific enzymatic reaction and quenching effect of GQDs is reported. The reaction between the glucose and GQDs was accomplished by the addition of GOx, HRP and phenol. Glucose was oxidized by GOx; the formed H 2 O 2 oxidized phenol via the catalysis by HRP. The oxidation product, quinone, caused the conspicuous quenching effect on GQDs due to efficient electron transfer from GQDs to quinone. The analysis results suggest the quenching degree was proportional to glucose concentration, which means the proposed approach could be successfully applied for the quantization of the glucose.
The bio-probe shows a high sensitivity ascribed to the ultrahigh optical properties of GQDs, and achieves high selectivity towards glucose attributable to the specificity and the unique affinity of the enzyme coupling method. The present approach is applicable for detecting glucose in human serum samples and have the potentiality to be extended to other systems. The present approach provided a pathway for the determination of the substance, which can generate glucose or H 2 O 2 . By combining fluorescent materials with the enzyme-coupled system, selective optical methods can have a more comprehensive application in future development.

Author Contributions

H.Z. and Z.L. conceived and designed the experiments; B.W. performed the experiments and analyzed data; J.S. wrote the paper and visualized data; B.W. and Z.L. revised the paper; and H.Z. and Y.H. supervised the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31772058), Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province (20160520127JH), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016T90260 and 2013M541309), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

GQDsGraphene quantum dots
HRPhorseradish peroxidase
GOxglucose oxidase
H 2 O 2 hydrogen peroxide

References

  1. Matz, K.; Keresztes, K.; Tatschl, C.; Nowotny, M.; Dachenhausen, A.; Brainin, M.; Tuomilehto, J. Disorders of glucose metabolism in acute stroke patients: An underrecognized problem. Diabetes Care 2006, 29, 792–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Barzilay, J.I.; Spiekerman, C.F.; Kuller, L.H.; Burke, G.L.; Bittner, V.; Gottdiener, J.S.; Brancati, F.L.; Orchard, T.J.; O’Leary, D.H.; Savage, P.J. Prevalence of clinical and isolated subclinical cardiovascular disease in older adults with glucose disorders-The Cardiovascular Health Study. Diabetes Care 2001, 24, 1233–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pickup, J.C.; Zhi, Z.L.; Khan, F.; Saxl, T.; Birch, D.J.S. Nanomedicine and its potential in diabetes research and practice. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2008, 24, 604–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chowdhury, H.H.; Kreft, M.; Jensen, J.; Zorec, R. Insulin Induces an Increase in Cytosolic Glucose Levels in 3T3-L1 Cells with Inhibited Glycogen Synthase Activation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 17827–17837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Arvand, M.; Hemmati, S. Magnetic nanoparticles embedded with graphene quantum dots and multiwalled carbon nanotubes as a sensing platform for electrochemical detection of progesterone. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 238, 346–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shiddiky, M.J.A.; Rauf, S.; Kithva, P.H.; Trau, M. Graphene/quantum dot bionanoconjugates as signal amplifiers in stripping voltammetric detection of EpCAM biomarkers. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2012, 35, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Su, L.; Feng, J.; Zhou, X.; Ren, C.; Li, H.; Chen, X. Colorimetric Detection of Urine Glucose Based ZnFe2O4 Magnetic Nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 5753–5758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Xia, X.D.; Long, Y.F.; Wang, J.X. Glucose oxidase-functionalized fluorescent gold nanoclusters as probes for glucose. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 772, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Jin, L.; Shang, L.; Guo, S.; Fang, Y.; Wen, D.; Wang, L.; Yin, J.; Dong, S. Biomolecule-stabilized Au nanoclusters as a fluorescence probe for sensitive detection of glucose. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 26, 1965–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Sricharoen, P.; Limchoowong, N.; Areerob, Y.; Nuengmatcha, P.; Techawongstien, S.; Chanthai, S. Fe3O4/hydroxyapatite/graphene quantum dots as a novel nano-sorbent for preconcentration of copper residue in Thai food ingredients: Optimization of ultrasound-assisted magnetic solid phase extraction. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2017, 37, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zhang, W.L.H.; Zhang, L.L.; Gao, H.L.; Yang, W.Y.; Wang, S.; Xing, L.L.; Xue, X.Y. Self-Powered Implantable Skin-Like Glucometer for Real-Time Detection of Blood Glucose Level In Vivo. Nano-Micro Lett. 2018, 10, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Newman, J.D.; Turner, A.P.F. Home blood glucose biosensors: A commercial perspective. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2005, 20, 2435–2453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Steiner, M.S.; Duerkop, A.; Wolfbeis, O.S. Optical methods for sensing glucose. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 4805–4839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Huang, X.Y.; Lan, T.; Zhang, B.C.; Ren, J.C. Gold nanoparticle-enzyme conjugates based FRET for highly sensitive determination of hydrogen peroxide, glucose and uric acid using tyramide reaction. Analyst 2012, 137, 3659–3666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jacobs, C.B.; Peairs, M.J.; Venton, B.J. Review: Carbon nanotube based electrochemical sensors for biomolecules. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 662, 105–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Besteman, K.; Lee, J.O.; Wiertz, F.G.M.; Heering, H.A.; Dekker, C. Enzyme-coated carbon nanotubes as single-molecule biosensors. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 727–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, Y.J.; Xin, B.J.; Duan, X.R.; Xing, G.W.; Wang, S. Assembly of Anionic Conjugated Polymer with 6-O-Modified PNP-beta-Galactoside for Fluorescence Logic-signal-based Multiplex Detections of Enzymes. Macromol. Rapid. Commun. 2010, 31, 1473–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Azmi, N.E.; Ramli, N.I.; Abdullah, J.; Hamid, M.A.A.; Sidek, H.; Abd Rahman, S.; Ariffin, N.; Yusof, N.A. A simple and sensitive fluorescence based biosensor for the determination of uric acid using H2O2-sensitive quantum dots/dual enzymes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 67, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Uusitalo, L.M.; Hempel, N. Recent Advances in Intracellular and In Vivo ROS Sensing: Focus on Nanoparticle and Nanotube Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 10660–10679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. McQuade, D.T.; Pullen, A.E.; Swager, T.M. Conjugated polymer-based chemical sensors. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2537–2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Mohanty, J.G.; Jaffe, J.S.; Schulman, E.S.; Raible, D.G. A highly sensitive fluorescent micro-assay of H2O2 release from activated human leukocytes using a dihydroxyphenoxazine derivative. J. Immunol. Methods 1997, 202, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Geim, A.K. Graphene: Status and Prospects. Science 2009, 324, 1530–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Forsyth, R.; Devadoss, A.; Guy, O.J. Graphene Field Effect Transistors for Biomedical Applications: Current Status and Future Prospects. Diagnostics 2017, 7, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Najafabadi, A.T. Emerging applications of graphene and its derivatives in carbon capture and conversion: Current status and future prospects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 41, 1515–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bacon, M.; Bradley, S.J.; Nann, T. Graphene Quantum Dots. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2014, 31, 415–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dai, H.J. Carbon nanotubes: Opportunities and challenges. Surf. Sci. 2017, 500, 218–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ponomarenko, L.A.; Schedin, F.; Katsnelson, M.I.; Yang, R.; Hill, E.; Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K. Chaotic dirac billiard in graphene quantum dots. Science 2008, 320, 356–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wang, L.; Wang, Y.L.; Xu, T.; Liao, H.B.; Yao, C.J.; Liu, Y.; Li, Z.; Chen, Z.W.; Pan, D.Y.; Sun, L.T.; et al. Gram-scale synthesis of single-crystalline graphene quantum dots with superior optical properties. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Samareh, J.A.; Siochi, E.J. Systems analysis of carbon nanotubes: Opportunities and challenges for space applications. Nanotechnology 2017, 28, 372001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Chong, Y.; Ma, Y.F.; Shen, H.; Tu, X.L.; Zhou, X.; Xu, J.Y.; Dai, J.W.; Fan, S.J.; Zhang, Z.J. The in vitro and in vivo toxicity of graphene quantum dots. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 5041–5048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Qian, Z.S.; Shan, X.Y.; Chai, L.J.; Chen, J.R.; Peng, H. A fluorescent nanosensor based on graphene quantum dots-aptamer probe and graphene oxide platform for detection of lead (II) ion. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 68, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Vasilescu, I.; Eremia, S.A.V.; Kusko, M.; Radoi, A.; Vasile, E.; Radu, G.L. Molybdenum disulphide and graphene quantum dots as electrode modifiers for laccase biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 75, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Shang, W.H.; Zhang, X.Y.; Zhang, M.; Fan, Z.T.; Sun, Y.T.; Han, M.; Fan, L.Z. The uptake mechanism and biocompatibility of graphene quantum dots with human neural stem cells. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 5799–5806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fan, Z.T.; Zhou, S.X.; Garcia, C.; Fan, L.Z.; Zhou, J.B. pH-Responsive fluorescent graphene quantum dots for fluorescence-guided cancer surgery and diagnosis. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 4928–4933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Qi, Y.X.; Zhang, M.; Fu, Q.Q.; Liu, R.; Shi, G.Y. Highly sensitive and selective fluorescent detection of cerebral lead(II) based on graphene quantum dot conjugates. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 10599–10601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Na, W.D.; Qu, Z.Y.; Chen, X.Q.; Su, X.G. A turn-on fluorescent probe for sensitive detection of sulfide anions and ascorbic acid by using sulfanilic acid and glutathione functionalized graphene quantum dots. Sens. Actuators B 2018, 256, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, B.J.; Zhuo, S.J.; Chen, L.Y.; Zhang, Y.J. Fluorescent graphene quantum dot nanoprobes for the sensitive and selective detection of mercury ions. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2014, 131, 384–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Yang, L.; Qin, A.M.; Chen, S.P.; Liao, L.; Qin, J.K.; Zhang, K.Y. Manganese(II) enhanced fluorescent nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots: A facile and efficient synthesis and their applications for bioimaging and detection of Hg2+ ions. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 5902–5911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhao, X.E.; Lei, C.H.; Gao, Y.; Gao, H.; Zhu, S.Y.; Yang, X.; You, J.M.; Wang, H. A ratiometric fluorescent nanosensor for the detection of silver ions using graphene quantum dots. Sens. Actuators B 2017, 253, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, R.; Yang, R.; Qu, C.J.; Mao, H.C.; Hu, Y.; Li, J.J.; Qu, L.B. Synthesis of glycine-functionalized graphene quantum dots as highly sensitive and selective fluorescent sensor of ascorbic acid in human serum. Sens. Actuators B 2017, 241, 644–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, Y.X.; Huang, H.; Ma, Y.H.; Tong, J. Highly sensitive fluorescent detection of dihydroxybenzene based on graphene quantum dots. Sens. Actuators B 2014, 205, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. He, Y.; Wang, X.; Sun, J.; Jiao, S.; Chen, H.; Gao, F.; Wang, L. Fluorescent blood glucose monitor by hemin-functionalized graphene quantum dots based sensing system. Anal. Chim. Acta 2014, 810, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Huang, S.; Wang, L.M.; Huang, C.S.; Su, W.; Xiao, Q. Label-free and ratiometric fluorescent nanosensor based on amino-functionalized graphene quantum dots coupling catalytic G-quadruplex/hemin DNAzyme for ultrasensitive recognition of human telomere DNA. Sens. Actuators B 2017, 245, 648–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Minisci, F.; Citterio, A.; Vismara, E.; Fontana, F.; Debernardinis, S.; Correale, M. Facile and Convenient Syntheses of Quinones from Phenols. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 728–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Huggett, A.S.G.; Nixoh, D.A. Use of glucose oxidase, peroxidase, and o-dianisidine in determination of blood and urinary glucose. Lancet 1957, 273, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yuan, J.; Guo, W.; Wang, E. Utilizing a CdTe quantum dots-enzyme hybrid system for the determination of both phenolic compounds and hydrogen peroxide. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 1141–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Li, Z.; Sun, R.L.; Ni, Y.N.; Kokot, S. A novel fluorescent probe involving a graphene quantum dot-enzyme hybrid system for the analysis of hydroquinone in the presence of toxic resorcinol and catechol. Anal. Methods 2014, 6, 7420–7425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cai, N.; Tan, L.; Li, Y.; Xia, T.; Hu, T.; Su, X. Biosensing platform for the detection of uric acid based on graphene quantum dots and Gquadruplex/hemin DNAzyme. Anal. Chim. Acta 2017, 965, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Song, Y.J.; Qu, K.G.; Zhao, C.; Ren, J.S.; Qu, X.G. Graphene Oxide: Intrinsic Peroxidase Catalytic Activity and Its Application to Glucose Detection. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 2206–2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Feng, J.Y.; Huang, P.C.; Wu, F.Y. Gold-platinum bimetallic nanoclusters with enhanced peroxidase-like activity and their integrated agarose hydrogel-based sensing platform for the colorimetric analysis of glucose levels in serum. Analys 2017, 142, 4106–4115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Razmi, H.; Mohammad-Rezaei, R. Graphene quantum dots as a new substrate for immobilization and direct electrochemistry of glucose oxidase: Application to sensitive glucose determination. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 41, 498–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yi, Y.H.; Deng, J.H.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Li, H.T.; Yao, S.Z. Label-free Si quantum dots as photoluminescence probes for glucose detection. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 612–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ma, J.L.; Yin, B.C.; Wu, X.; Ye, B.C. Simple and Cost-Effective Glucose Detection Based on Carbon Nanodots Supported on Silver Nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 1323–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Molaabasi, F.; Hosseinkhani, S.; Moosavi-Movahedi, A.A.; Shamsipur, M. Hydrogen peroxide sensitive hemoglobin-capped gold nanoclusters as a fluorescence enhancing sensor for the label-free detection of glucose. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 33123–33135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, R.Z.; He, S.J.; Zhang, C.M.; Chen, W. Three-dimensional Fe- and N-incorporated carbon structures as peroxidase mimics for fluorescence detection of hydrogen peroxide and glucose. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 3, 4146–4154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of GQDs.
Figure 1. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of GQDs.
Ijms 19 01696 g001
Scheme 1. Schematic representation of sensing strategy to glucose by using glucose oxidase (GOx), horseradish peroxidase (HRP), phenol and GQDs catalyzed reaction.
Scheme 1. Schematic representation of sensing strategy to glucose by using glucose oxidase (GOx), horseradish peroxidase (HRP), phenol and GQDs catalyzed reaction.
Ijms 19 01696 sch001
Figure 2. The effect of concentration levels of H 2 O 2 on the PL intensity of GQDs.
Figure 2. The effect of concentration levels of H 2 O 2 on the PL intensity of GQDs.
Ijms 19 01696 g002
Figure 3. The effect of components of glucose and biosensor on the PL intensity of GQDs: (Black) GQDs–GOx–HRP–phenol; and (Red) GQDs–GOx–HRP–phenol with glucose addition.
Figure 3. The effect of components of glucose and biosensor on the PL intensity of GQDs: (Black) GQDs–GOx–HRP–phenol; and (Red) GQDs–GOx–HRP–phenol with glucose addition.
Ijms 19 01696 g003
Figure 4. Effect of enzyme concentration on fluorescence intensity.
Figure 4. Effect of enzyme concentration on fluorescence intensity.
Ijms 19 01696 g004
Figure 5. The relationship between fluorescence intensity of the GQDs and the incubation time in the: presence of glucose (Black); and absence of glucose (Red).
Figure 5. The relationship between fluorescence intensity of the GQDs and the incubation time in the: presence of glucose (Black); and absence of glucose (Red).
Ijms 19 01696 g005
Figure 6. Fluorescence emission spectra of different concentrations of glucose. 0 (black), 0.2 (red), 1.0 (green), 2.0 (blue), 4.0 (cyan), 6.0 (magenta), 9.0 (yellow), 10 (dark yellow) μ mol/L, respectively. Inset is the linear calibration of the fluorescence intensity ratio of I/I 0 and the concentration of glucose.
Figure 6. Fluorescence emission spectra of different concentrations of glucose. 0 (black), 0.2 (red), 1.0 (green), 2.0 (blue), 4.0 (cyan), 6.0 (magenta), 9.0 (yellow), 10 (dark yellow) μ mol/L, respectively. Inset is the linear calibration of the fluorescence intensity ratio of I/I 0 and the concentration of glucose.
Ijms 19 01696 g006
Figure 7. Effect of glucose concentration on I/I 0 in the presence of potential interferents.
Figure 7. Effect of glucose concentration on I/I 0 in the presence of potential interferents.
Ijms 19 01696 g007
Table 1. Comparison of different methods for the determination of glucose.
Table 1. Comparison of different methods for the determination of glucose.
MethodSystemLinear Range ( μ M)LOD ( μ M)Reference
ColorimetryGraphene oxide/GOx/TMB1–201[49]
ColorimetryAu–PtNCs/GOx/TMB5–552.4[50]
ElectrochemistryGraphene quantum dots/GOx5–12701.73[51]
FluorometryHemin–functionalized GQDs/GOx9–3000.1[42]
FluorometrySi quantum dots/GOx5–6500.68[52]
FluorometryC–dots/AgNPs/GOx2–1001.39[53]
FluorometryHb–AuNCs/GOx0.5–10001.65[54]
FluorometryTA/Fe–Phen–CFs0.5–2000.19[55]
FluorometryGraphene quantum dots/GOx/HRP/phenol0.2–100.08This paper
Table 2. Glucose determination in dilute serum samples (n = 3).
Table 2. Glucose determination in dilute serum samples (n = 3).
SamplesAdded Glucose ( μ M)Measured ( μ M)Recovery (%)RSD (%)
Serum 121.9798.53.94
Serum 255.11102.02.44

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, B.; Shen, J.; Huang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhuang, H. Graphene Quantum Dots and Enzyme-Coupled Biosensor for Highly Sensitive Determination of Hydrogen Peroxide and Glucose. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1696. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19061696

AMA Style

Wang B, Shen J, Huang Y, Liu Z, Zhuang H. Graphene Quantum Dots and Enzyme-Coupled Biosensor for Highly Sensitive Determination of Hydrogen Peroxide and Glucose. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(6):1696. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19061696

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Bingdi, Jing Shen, Yanjun Huang, Zhenning Liu, and Hong Zhuang. 2018. "Graphene Quantum Dots and Enzyme-Coupled Biosensor for Highly Sensitive Determination of Hydrogen Peroxide and Glucose" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 6: 1696. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19061696

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop